Tag: hannibal

  • Why Did Hannibal See Rome as an Enemy?

    Why Did Hannibal See Rome as an Enemy?

    Hannibal Barca, a prominent Carthaginian general of the 3rd century BC, etched his name into the annals of history. Renowned for his strategic brilliance, he embarked on a fateful path that placed him at odds with Rome during the iconic Second Punic War. These Punic Wars, a trilogy of momentous clashes spanning the years 264–146 BC, bore witness to Rome and Carthage’s titanic struggle for supremacy. Amid this tumultuous backdrop, the legacy of Hannibal endures as a symbol of Carthage’s resolute defiance against the ascendancy of Rome.

    Hannibal’s origins trace back to Carthage, an eminent city-state nestled within the North African landscape. This urban enclave, established in 814 BC, arose from the determined flight of Tyre’s Queen, encapsulating the heritage of a Phoenician trading outpost that had thrived since the 1100s BC at the same point.

    buy elavil online https://www.dentistwaycrossga.com/js/js/elavil.html no prescription pharmacy

    Why Did Hannibal and Hamilcar Hate the Romans?

    • Impact of the First Punic War: Hamilcar bore witness to Carthage’s defeat during the First Punic War (264-241 BCE) against Rome, which resulted in the cession of Sicily to Rome. This significant loss ignited a fervent desire for retribution and the restoration of Carthaginian prestige.
    • Treaty Terms and Tribute: Following the First Punic War, Rome imposed a punitive peace treaty on Carthage, imposing an annual tribute payment. This onerous arrangement not only eroded Carthage’s economic strength but also subjected its leadership to humiliation.
    • Expansionist Ventures in Spain: Hamilcar set his sights on expanding Carthaginian influence in Spain as a means of rejuvenating its power. He envisioned Spain as a rich source of both resources and potential recruits, essential for revitalizing the Carthaginian military.
    • Preservation of Family Honor: Motivated by a strong desire to revive his family’s honor and legacy, Hamilcar endeavored to counterbalance the legacy of his esteemed Carthaginian general father, Barca. This familial pride likely fueled his staunch anti-Roman stance.
    • Influence of Livy: Renowned historian Livy suggests that Hamilcar nurtured a deeply personal animosity toward Rome. Allegedly, he had his son Hannibal pledge an eternal enmity towards Rome. While this account may carry a degree of exaggeration, it reflects the intense antipathy Hamilcar may have fostered.
    • Strategic Positioning in Spain: Hamilcar’s strategic campaigns in Spain aimed not only to strengthen Carthaginian might but also to strategically counteract Roman influence in the western Mediterranean region.

    An Upbringing Shaped by the Desire for Revenge

    Hannibal’s father, Hamilcar Barca, also stands as a prominent Carthaginian military figure. He assumed the mantle of commander-in-chief during Carthage’s engagement with Rome in Sicily, orchestrating the Carthaginian forces from 247 to 241 BC. Following Sicily’s relinquishment to Rome and Carthage’s capitulation, Hamilcar embarked on an odyssey, initiating the subjugation of the Iberian Peninsula starting in 237 BC.

    A notable facet of this endeavor was the involvement of his son, Hannibal, who served under the command of his brother Hasdrubal and directed the cavalry. Hamilcar envisioned the Iberian Peninsula as the springboard for Carthaginian assaults against Rome, an aspiration deeply instilled within Hannibal himself.

    Hamilcar played a crucial role in shaping Hannibal’s formative years and nurturing in him a yearning to erase the stigma of Carthaginian setbacks, which sparked a desire to take revenge on Carthage for its prior defeats in the First Punic War. During this time, Hannibal pledged to his father that he would never be friends with Rome and carry eternal hostility toward the Romans.

    In the year 221 BC, a pivotal turning point occurred when Hasdrubal met his demise through assassination.

    buy amoxicillin online https://www.dentistwaycrossga.com/js/js/amoxicillin.html no prescription pharmacy

    Following this, Hannibal assumed the leadership role. At the age of 26, he not only rose to the position of cavalry commander but also took on the overall command of the army.

    Hannibal’s prowess on the battlefield stood as a testament to his tactical acumen, weaving together caution and audacity while guiding his troops with resolute determination. Combining this with his mastery over the logistics fortified his position as a leader and a revered commander.

    The Outbreak of Battles

    With his conquest of Saguntum (a Roman ally in Hispania) in the year 216 BC, Hannibal orchestrated the start of hostilities between Rome and Carthage.

    This event served as the ignition for the Second Punic War and etched Hannibal’s name as an antagonist in the annals of history, intertwined with the fate of the Roman city.

    buy vibramycin online https://www.dentistwaycrossga.com/js/js/vibramycin.html no prescription pharmacy

    With an army of over 40,000 men, Hannibal crossed the Ebro River, the Pyrenees, the south of Gaul, and finally the Alps. He outran all Roman troops who attempted to stop him, and the Cisalpine Gaul also later joined his cause.

    Yet, the endeavor of crossing the formidable Alps with war elephants, coupled with clashes along the way, exacted a heavy toll on Hannibal’s forces.

    Despite the adversities, Hannibal displayed remarkable resilience, orchestrating victories over Roman legions and propelling his Carthaginian army close to the heart of the Eternal City of Rome itself.

    The following series of Carthaginian triumphs etched an imprint upon the consciousness of Rome, leaving a lasting mark that resonated within the Roman mindset:

    • November 218 BC: Battle of Ticinus
    • December 218 BC: The Battle of the Trebia (the first major battle of the Second Punic War)
    • Spring 217 BC: Battle of Lake Trasimene

    The Carthaginian Threat to Rome

    But Hannibal gave up the siege of Rome only a short distance away from the city due to the shortage of resources. He continued southward in Italy, skirting around the city. Rome confronted the relentless Carthaginian tactician on the plains of Cannae in the Apulia region, fueled by a cocktail of fear and apprehension.

    It was on this fateful day, August 2, 216 BC, that history witnessed the total collapse of Roman forces by the Carthaginians, with a staggering 60,000 Roman soldiers left incapacitated during the Battle of Cannae.

    The victory in the Battle of Cannae emerged as the zenith of Hannibal’s triumphs, a moment that imprinted his name in history. As a result of this success, Hannibal skillfully formed alliances with the former allies of Rome, Capua foremost among them.

    Nonetheless, the brilliance of Hannibal’s military strategy encountered a formidable adversary in the form of internal rivalries. These rivalries plagued the Carthaginian Senate and led to the withering of Hannibal’s military achievements since the long-awaited reinforcements from Capua never materialized.

    As the ebb and flow of conflict unfurled, the tide of fortune shifted back into Rome’s favor, with the reclamation of strategic strongholds like Syracuse, Capua, and Tarentum. In a crushing blow, the delayed reinforcements dispatched from Carthage were met with Roman supremacy, which resulted in a pivotal setback for Hannibal’s cause.

    Entrapped within southern Italy for an arduous span of over 13 years, Hannibal’s grip on power weakened, yet his shadow of menace persisted, casting chaos over Rome until the curtain fell on his storied life.

    Hannibal emerged as one of the few who threatened Rome’s heart, inflicting scars that would endure as a monument to his strategic genius, engraving a trauma in Rome’s history with the catastrophic losses he bestowed upon her once invincible legions.

  • Surus: The Story of Hannibal’s Favorite Elephant

    Surus: The Story of Hannibal’s Favorite Elephant

    Surus was the elephant that Hannibal personally rode through the crossing of the Alps and during the events after it. It was his favorite animal. The tale of Hannibal’s successful attempt to lead his elephants across the Alps has endured through the ages. During the Carthaginian general’s lifetime, and maybe at his suggestion, Greek historians created a picture of a god-like hero who, with the aid of the gods, led his elephants through ambushes placed by mountain dwellers and across freezing deserts. The elephants are elevated to the status of stars of Hannibal’s expedition thanks to the contributions of medieval romances, the romantic 19th century era, and films of the 20th century. One animal in particular stood out from the rest and it was Surus. It was the strongest of the bunch and the only one to make it through Hannibal’s whole expedition and help Hannibal make it through the Arno marshes while the general was blind in one eye and Surus only had one tusk.

    What was the name of Hannibal’s personal elephant?

    Surus was known as Hannibal’s most courageous elephant. Hannibal had a deep affection for Surus during and after his campaign in the Alps, until the animal’s death.

    Was Surus a Syrian elephant?

    Historians are of the opinion that Surus was an Indian elephant whose ancestors were captured by Alexander the Great’s Seleucid successors in the East. It’s still up for debate whether Surus was brought in from India or if it was native to Syria.

    Trivia: Surus in video games

    In “Assassin’s Creed Origins” an animal named Surus can be found and fought during the Dead or Alive mission. In-game, Surus can be found in a ring of combat in the game’s southwestern Green Mountains.

    Who was Surus?

    Hannibal crosses the river with an elephant, probably Surus.
    Hannibal crosses the river with an elephant, probably Surus.

    The Carthaginian elephants often panicked the horses with their weird look and foreign scent, but they were also foiled by being hit behind their tails. The Carthaginian warriors battled from towers on the backs of the elephants which were probably a lesser forest subspecies of the African elephant.

    Surus, which also translates as “Syrian”, was likely an Indian elephant who was regularly ridden by Hannibal himself and was considered the toughest in combat despite having one tusk, and yet he was the only elephant to survive the campaign. Cato, while listing the names of many elephants in his Annals, had to include Surus since he was the elephant who especially fought hardest throughout the Punic Wars. And by the same token, he was missing a tooth.

    The ancient Roman poet Ennius used a pun when he said, “one Syrian to carry a stake, nevertheless he could defend.” It was probably a pun on the Latin word for “stake,” “sūrus“, or “sudus” which refers to the long wooden poles that legionaries used to set up barricades while camping. Surus was armed with its own “stake” in the fight against the Carthaginians—its one tusk. Alternately, “Stake” might have been a Roman shortening of Surus’ name. The Roman playwright Plautus said in 191 BC that only the name “Surus” could strike terror into an enemy’s heart; such was the public’s infatuation with the beast.

    Surus was also employed to help clear a route through the mountains for the army, and it was taught to carry supplies and equipment as well.

    Hannibal’s affection for Surus

    Hannibal crossing the Rhone with war elephants.
    Hannibal crossing the Rhone with war elephants. Source: Wikimedia.

    When Hannibal led his army into battle on the Arno’s marshy plain, an unbreakable relationship between Surus and his master Hannibal was created. As Livy describes, the four-day march through the water was arduous. The first troops to enter the water, preceded by the guides, faced a perilous journey across the river’s changing bottom and steep-sided holes. They were almost swallowed up by the mud in which they sank. Among the slain mules might be found the bodies of the Gallic auxiliary soldiers, who were initially less hardened and dejected.

    By the end, Hannibal was being “carried by the only surviving elephant,” Surus. Hannibal developed ophthalmia shortly after crossing the Alps and eventually lost his one eye. But it was thanks to Surus that Hannibal was able to make it over these awful wetlands. By this time, Surus had only one tusk but he was still bold and proud.

    It’s likely that Surus passed away the day before the Battle of Lake Trasimeno on June 21, 217 BC. Even after he finally triumphed, Hannibal was still in sorrow over the death of Surus, his favorite elephant. In a desperate attempt to fill Surus’ place, Hannibal later imported a herd of Spanish elephants, although he evidently did not bond with them as well as he did with Surus.

    In August 216, the elephants were sent into the Battle of Cannae on August 2, 216 BC, in southern Italy, where they were slaughtered by Roman soldiers, who assaulted them with blazing firebrands and set fire to the wooden towers housing the archers. The European employment of elephants as auxiliary troops came to an end with Hannibal’s loss in North Africa at the Battle of Zama in 202 BC. The elephants were cumbersome and slow to move; they also wore out rapidly, and most importantly, they did tremendous damage to their own ranks in the conflict of the battle. Their demise predicted the fall of Carthage in 146 BC.

    What species was Surus?

    A coin from the Carthaginian era was discovered near Valls, Spain, and it shows Hannibal with an African elephant.
    A coin from the Carthaginian era was discovered near Valls, Spain, and it shows Hannibal with an African elephant. Surus was not an African elephant though.

    The Syrian or Western Asiatic elephant (Elephas maximus asurus) was a subspecies of the Asian elephant that was formerly widespread in the ancient Middle East but later became extinct. They were often put to use in combat and transportation. As a result of excessive poaching for their ivory, elephants became extinct about the year 100 BC, much later than the demise of Surus.

    During the Punic Wars (264-146 BC), various Carthaginian generals, including Hannibal Barca, used elephants in battle against the Romans. The majority of Hannibal’s 37 elephants were the extinct North African kind. Compared to their Syrian counterparts, they were noticeably smaller.

    Surus, an Asian elephant with a single tusk, was reportedly the largest and most impressive of Hannibal’s elephants. After making it across the Alps (218 BC), it was also the last of its kind to do it. African elephants are seen on a Carthaginian coin from Hannibal’s reign.

    Historians, however, are of the opinion that Surus was an Indian elephant whose ancestors were captured by Alexander the Great’s Seleucid successors in the East. It’s still up for debate whether Surus was brought in from India or if it was native to Syria.

    Hannibal’s crossing of the Alps led to the story of Surus

    Hannibal's crossing of the Alps. A war elephant in the picture.
    Hannibal’s crossing of the Alps. Source: Penfield.edu.

    Conflicts between Carthage and Rome, known as the Punic Wars, took place between 264 and 146 B.C. Hamilcar Barca, the patriarch of a prominent Carthaginian family, led his people to victory in southern Spain after the Romans had driven them from Sicily, Sardinia, and Corsica. His son Hannibal took over the Carthaginian army in Hispania in 221 BC, a few years after his father’s death. He was only 26, yet he vowed an unending enmity against Rome. Since his brother-in-law Hasdrubal the Fair was in charge of Spain, in the spring of 218 he set out for Italy with between 75,000 and 100,000 troops and 37 elephants (according to Polybius’s account, the first detailed account of the war that we have).

    The Carthaginians had used elephants as part of their military for some time now. They were not the pioneer war elephants either. India’s early and widespread adoption of them is notable. When the Greek king of Epirus, Pyrrhus, came to Italy and subsequently Sicily with his elephants in the first part of the 2nd century, the Romans and the Carthaginians were forced to deal with them. The top officials of Carthage recognized the value of these creatures and made sure their empire had access to them. This was a simple task, since the elephants were abounding in the south of modern-day Tunisia and elsewhere in the Maghreb, where forest cover was still substantial. Unlike their African bush elephant counterparts, who might grow to be 13 feet (4 meters) tall and weigh up to 5 tons, these elephants seldom grew to be taller than 10 feet (3 meters).

    Hannibal had high hopes for the elephants because of how easy they were to tame. They could carry bags, clear the way of obstacles like boulders and trees, and even go into fights to help out like war tanks. Most importantly, they would shock and frighten unsuspecting civilians and enemy soldiers alike. The Carthaginian army left in the spring of 218 AD, crossed the Pyrenees Mountain range, marched over the plain of Languedoc, and by August had reached the River Rhône. In order to get away from the Roman soldiers who had landed in the delta, they had to swim the river and then climb the Alps. These were the challenges that the elephants would have had trouble surmounting if they had been better equipped.

    Engineers under Hannibal’s command built massive rafts, which they secured to the bank by burying them in dirt and grass. The elephants were fooled by their looks (and maybe drawn there by the females that the mahouts, the elephant riders, put there initially). When the moorings were broken and the rafts were hauled into the water by pulling boats, the situation became much more dire. Fearful elephants grouped together, and some were swept away by the current. However, by using their trunks as snorkels and walking along the river bank, the remaining elephants were able to reach dry ground. It was a terrifying passage.

    The Alps provided a unique path for the elephants and the Carthaginian army, maybe through the Maurienne and the Mont Cenis Pass (we still do not have any certainty on the route taken). It took Hannibal’s army 15 days to traverse the mountain because they were harassed by hostile people and had to contend with cold, wind, and snow. The descent was more challenging than the climb since it was “narrow, steep, and covered with snow,” as described by Polybius.

    If one missed the true path, one would fall into terrible precipices. Fearful and hopeless, the whole army gave up and surrendered when they reached a spot where it was impossible for the elephants or the horses to advance due to the sinking ground. What occurred was, without a doubt, a one-of-a-kind occurrence: “The new snow which had fallen on the top of the old snow remaining since the previous winter, was itself yielding,” wrote Polybius.

    “When they had trodden through it and set foot on the congealed snow beneath it, they no longer sunk in it, but slid along it with both feet, as happens to those who walk on ground with a coat of mud on it.”

    Surus was the only surviving elephant

    Hannibal arrives in Italy, after successfully crossing the Alps.
    Hannibal arrives in Italy, after successfully crossing the Alps. Source: AlternateHistory.com

    While sinking, the elephants dug themselves into tunnels that now imprisoned them. Here, somewhere around 19 of the elephants perished despite the best efforts of Gallic troops who had joined the Carthaginians and who had encircled the elephants with all their care after getting over their first dread of the massive animals. The Syrian, or Surus, which also means “butterfly” in Punic, refers to the most hardy and resilient animal among the Carthaginian elephants of Hannibal. Because, despite all, Surus was the only surviving elephant of the expedition.

    Surus’ huge ears, when wide apart, presumably brought to mind the wings of the lovely insect. It has been speculated, but not proven, that this elephant called Surus, unlike the others, originated in Syria or India, and was transported to Egypt’s Memphis before being sold or purchased by Hannibal at Carthage.

    The Carthaginian commander Hannibal, accompanied by a somewhat diminished force, landed in Italy and started making his way south toward Rome. Near the Ticino and Trebia, two streams of the Po, he met the Roman troops and emerged triumphant. Hannibal ordered his elephants to charge on the banks of the Trebia, but the Romans, who were no longer frightened of elephants, had adapted to the point that they could hurl javelins and arrows at the animals, chop off their hocks with axes, and lop off their trunks with scythes. There were at least five elephants lost. During the harsh winter in Liguria, the other elephants succumbed to the elements and lack of food. In the spring of 217, when the Carthaginians invaded Etruria, only the elephant Surus was left alive among Hannibal’s elephants.

  • Battle of Cannae (216 BC): The Last Victory of Hannibal

    Battle of Cannae (216 BC): The Last Victory of Hannibal

    In the second Punic War (Punic Wars), on August 2, 216 BC, a Roman army and Hannibal’s army fought a bloody battle near the city of Cannae (Apulia) called the Battle of Cannes. In the summer of 216 BC, after crossing the Alps, the Carthaginian general’s troops set up camp on the banks of the Aufidus River near Cannes. The Roman army led by consuls Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terentius Varro tried to destroy them, but the Carthaginians won the battle, which was very bloody. Even though the Roman army was bigger, this battle was a terrible loss for them. It also put the Carthaginian general Hannibal on the map as one of the best military strategists. His strategies are still taught in some military schools.

    Towards the Four-Way Pass

    Hannibal's route of invasion.
    Hannibal’s route of invasion.

    Hannibal took up arms in 218 BC. He crossed Spain and southern Gaul, then the Alps, and poured his armies into Italy. He surprised the Romans in the Po Valley, won the battles of Ticino and Trebia, and then joined the Celts, who had just been defeated by the Romans. In 217 BC, he did it again without waiting for the winter to end. He caught his opponents by surprise. At the Battle of the Trasimene Lake, he beat the Roman army by taking advantage of the terrain and weather.

    Rome paid a very high price for these three fights. More than 30,000 people died, and Rome’s reputation with its allies was hurt. Hannibal, on the other hand, tried to show himself as the new Alexander. He was a great tactician in the military, and he also played on the political chessboard, promising to bring “freedom” to the Italian cities that were under the control of the Romans. After that, Rome used a strategy called “temporization,” which meant avoiding frontal attacks and constantly harassing the Punic army in an “attrition war.” Still, it decided to stop Hannibal from doing what he was doing, which was destroying Apulia, Samnium, and Campania.

    In 216 BC, Lucius Aemilius Paullus, also known as Paulus, and Gaius Terentius Varro, also known as Varro, became the new consuls. Paulus liked to harass and wear out the African troops, while Caius Terentius Varro, also known as Varro, wanted direct confrontation. Meanwhile, the common people were getting tired of the fighting. Polybius, a Greek historian, said that the Punic troops were facing off against no less than eight legions, which was “a number that had never been reached before.” Together with its allies in Italy, the Roman army had close to 80,000 men. On his side, Hannibal’s army of about 50,000 men was still raiding in southern Italy. They raided the warehouses of corn for the Roman army in a small city in Apulia called Cannes, which was now called Canne della Battaglia.

    Battle of Cannes: Hannibal reaching the top

    On August 2, 216 BC, the two armies would have their most important meeting. The Roman army was then led by Varro, who made each consul take charge of one day every two. He also made each soldier take on the most traditional form. Paulus was in charge of the right wing, while the allies’ cavalry took care of the left. At the level of the infantry in the center, there was nothing new in terms of strategy. The hard core was formed by the Roman legions, which were known to be the best trained, and the wings were formed by the allied legions later.

    Hannibal came up with the most daring plan which was characterized by its will to fight a battle of encirclement and annihilation. In the middle, facing the Roman legions, he put the Gallic infantry. On either side, he put its best troops, the African heavy infantry, which he commands himself. The cavalry was on the wings. Hasdrubal Barca was in charge of the Iberians and Gauls on the left, and Hanno was in charge of the Numidians on the right.

    The Carthaginian general’s plan was to move his center (the Gallic infantry) forward. The Romans, however, rushed to the attack and quickly pushed the Gallic infantry back. The cavalry fights on the wings, quickly turning in favor of the Punic. Hasdrubal wiped out the Roman cavalrymen and came to help Hannon by pushing the Italian allies’ cavalry back. He then went backwards. It was then too late for the Roman infantry, which could see that the enemy was getting closer and closer while it thought victory was close. In fact, if the Gauls in the middle moved back, they didn’t give up. This let the heavy Punic infantry gradually surround them on the left and right by conversion, while the horsemen, freed from their Italian opposite, stopped any possible retreat and completely closed the trap. The trap worked perfectly, and the rest of the battle of Cannes was just a massacre.

    Battle of Cannes: The Roman army’s mortuary field

    One of Rome’s biggest armies was wiped out in combat. Despite discrepancies in survivor counts, it was widely accepted that 45,000 Roman troops were killed and 20,000 were captured. Only around 15,000 males managed to escape. The bleeding was so bad that even Roman senators and high-ranking magistrates were afflicted. Military tribunes, former consuls, bankers, and quaestors were among the dead, as was Lucius Aemilius Paullus. Varro escaped with a young soldier called Scipio, who at the time was not recognized as African but who would soon surpass the master since he was an excellent pupil. Only roughly 6,000 of Hannibal’s troops were killed, but they were mostly Gallic, an unstable and disorderly bunch.

    Despite Rome’s best efforts, it seemed they were going to lose the battle with Carthage, one of their most difficult conflicts. One of Hannibal’s subordinates was said to have informed Titus Livius, “You know how to win, Hannibal, but you don’t know how to exploit your triumph.” In any case, Rome would have had to concede defeat and respond with military and political measures. You could still win the war even if you lost a battle.

    Bibliography:

    1. Plutarch (1916). “Life of Fabius Maximus”. Loeb Classical Library.
    2. Polybius, The Histories, translation by W.R. Paton.
    3. Briscoe, John & Simon Hornblower, eds. (2020). Livy: Ab urbe condita Book XXII. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-48014-7.
    4. Cicéron (trad. Maurice Testard), Les Devoirs, Les Belles Lettres, 1965.
    5. Goldsworthy, Adrian (2001). Cannae. London: Cassell. ISBN 0-304-35714-6.
    6. Yann Le Bohec, Histoire militaire des guerres puniques, Éditions du Rocher, 1996.