Tag: photosynthesis

  • Plankton: The Little Life-Givers of Earth Which Are Overlooked

    Scientists studying the oceans use the word “plankton” to describe any living thing that floats and travels with the tides and currents. They are often too small for the naked eye to detect without the use of a magnification or microscope. However, jellyfish, which is a plankton too, and other species may grow to be extremely big. There are hundreds of plankton species in just a single water drop.

    Plankton are essential to the survival of all other organisms. Phytoplankton, tiny plant organisms that float in the water, generate oxygen, and provide food for marine life. However, will climate change prove too much for these little creatures?” When their “bad sides” run amok, they create hazardous algal blooms.

    Even though plankton are very small, they have huge implications for the planet and for humankind. Each oxygen molecule in the air we breathe comes from them, and they also serve as the foundation for the vast majority of marine food webs. But how do these mini-superheroes do it all? And how do plankton handle the rising temperatures?

    Subtle Yet Vital Life-Givers

    Crab larvae and juvenile crabs are examples of zooplankton.
    Crab larvae and juvenile crabs are examples of zooplankton. (Credit: NOAA)

    The waters across the globe are teeming with life, from colorful coral reefs to sharks to whales. However, plankton, the microscopic animals that lie at the base of the ocean’s intricate food chain, are sometimes disregarded.

    The Greek root of the term “plankton” is to “float” or “move.” The majority of the organisms we classify as plankton are adrift in the water of the world’s seas, lakes, and rivers. Some animals are able to actively swim or alter their buoyancy, although even these are limited by the stream.

    Plankton includes anything from microscopic microorganisms called phytoplankton to massive 80-inch (200-cm) megaplankton weighing several pounds. Two major classes of plankton are the plant-based phytoplankton and the animal-based zooplankton. Animals like krill, jellyfish, arrowworms, and copepods are examples of zooplankton that stay their whole lives as plankton (holoplankton). Some species, including the larvae of fish and crabs, are plankton just temporarily (meroplankton).

    Oxygen From the Sea

    To the zooplankton, phytoplankton is a tasty and healthy feast since it photosynthesizes exactly like land plants. These tiny planktonic algae convert solar energy, carbon dioxide, and water into organic matter and oxygen. To get to the air, oxygen must first dissolve into water and then travel to the ocean’s surface.

    Phytoplankton
    Phytoplankton.

    Phytoplankton in the water is responsible for producing an estimated 70% of the oxygen in Earth’s atmosphere. And according to the most conservative estimations, that number is still 50%. No matter the case, at least half of the oxygen we breathe in is produced by marine phytoplankton.

    And not just today either. Two billion years ago, photosynthesis by phytoplankton guaranteed that Earth’s atmosphere was enriched with oxygen, allowing for a wide variety of animal life. Blue-green algae, often known as cyanobacteria, are singled out for this praise. Their name gives away the fact that they are bacteria and not plants. Nonetheless, they constitute one of the four major groups of phytoplankton because of their capacity to photosynthesize.

    As a byproduct of photosynthesis, phytoplankton removes carbon dioxide from the water, reducing the acidity of the seas. The carbon in the waste products of zooplankton, such as dead bodies and excrement, is stored in sediments, helping to maintain the ocean’s role as a carbon sink.

    An Extended Family

    Diatoms come in all shapes and sizes.
    Diatoms come in all shapes and sizes. (Credit: EOS)

    Diatoms are the most prevalent kind of plankton, which is termed phytoplankton.

    The so-called diatoms comprise the second of these major groups. Their silica shells are delicate and fragile. These shells may have a variety of shapes, including circles, triangles, rods, and arches. About 25% of all photosynthesis on Earth occurs in diatoms.

    Dinoflagellates, which have armored flagella, are another kind of plant plankton. Flagella, threadlike features on their surface, enable them to move around. Some armored flagellates supplement their diet with the flesh of other phytoplankton since they can’t produce enough of their own food via photosynthesis alone. Finally, the coccolithophorids, or calcareous algae, are the fourth and last group of phytoplankton. Calcium carbonate platelets form a spherical shell around their bodies.

    Plankton Serve As the Foundation of Aquatic Food Webs

    Phytoplankton
    Phytoplankton are essential to marine environments because they provide the foundation of the marine food web. (Credit: JAMSTEC)

    However, phytoplankton are not only “superheroes” because they provide oxygen. They also produce organic material as a byproduct of photosynthesis, which has remarkable properties of its own. Almost all marine food chains can be traced back to this component of the ocean. There would be no sharks, fish, or whales if not for phytoplankton.

    To put it simply, phytoplankton and algae are the backbones of aquatic food webs. Primary consumers like zooplankton, small fish, and crabs devour the tiny light-transformers after they have made their own food via photosynthesis. The zooplankton eats the microgreens much like cows eat grass.

    The primary consumers, like zooplankton, are prey to fish, tiny sharks, corals, and baleen whales. Massive baleen whales strain krill and other small fish from the ocean to eat. Ironically, the blue whale, the biggest living creature on Earth, subsists only on these little plankton creatures. Orcas, leopard seals, big sharks, and blue marlins are all examples of apex predators that may be found at the very top of marine food webs. Humans, too, participate in these complicated food webs by eating at a wide variety of levels.

    However, there is one thing that all of the organisms in this succession have in common: they all rely on phytoplankton. Phytoplankton are the lifeblood of the ocean, and without them, the seas would be a lifeless wasteland.

    Oceanic Fertilizers

    The seas’ vivacity and diversity are in large part due to zooplankton. Consuming and being consumed are not its exclusive duties. It also plays a significant role in the ocean’s nutrient cycle. The “fertilization” of the deep sea occurs when zooplankton excretes or when deceased individuals drop to the ocean floor.

    Another factor is the daily vertical movement of planktonic animals. The zooplankton often stays submerged throughout the day. There, it also defecates, speeding the descent of the nutrients in its waste to the sea floor. It’s only at night that the small floating critters go to the water’s surface to feast on the phytoplankton. It’s not safe to do this in the open ocean during the day.

    Antarctic Smorgasbord

    The food web in the Southern Ocean around Antarctica is a great example of a basic food chain based on plankton. There, planktonic diatoms coat the sea ice floes like a rug. Krill, a kind of tiny shrimp that are classified as zooplankton, eat them. The krill feed on the diatoms, which have a greenish-brown color, that float on the sea ice.

    Krill are an accessible target for predators, even if they are hidden in deeper waters during the day, since they travel in large groups and are therefore more visible. The blue whale and other baleen whales can filter thousands of shrimp from the frigid waters using their trap-like lips. In the past, during the pre-whaling period, observers saw crimson ocean surfaces stained by swarming krill and endless cascades of feeding whales.

    But then, our interference has disrupted the delicate equilibrium of this short, efficient food chain, which includes diatoms, krill, and baleen whales. The conventional view of the marine Antarctic community has been drastically altered in recent years by the intensive killing of whales in the previous century, followed by the severe exploitation of krill and the overfishing of fish supplies.

    However, these transformations did not develop as predicted by scientists.

    The Krill Paradox

    WHALES AND HUNTING

    Anyone, even a superhero, may benefit from assistance now and again. However, this is seldom witnessed until that assistance is suddenly unavailable. This is what occurred long ago in the Southern Ocean around Antarctica. A particularly destructive rampage by whalers there in the 20th century not only pushed the whales to the verge of extinction but also damaged the whole ecosystem, although in a manner that the whalers hadn’t anticipated.

    There should be a dramatic increase in the krill population if whales stopped consuming them, right? This did not happen. Instead, the krill population dropped by more than 80%. So, what happened? This krill paradox has baffled researchers for a long time.

    It is now known that the food chains in the Antarctic oceans were not strictly hierarchical, in the sense that whales eat krill and krill eat diatoms. In fact, they are better understood as a cycle in which whales have a direct impact even on phytoplankton, the very base of the food web.

    The once-abundant marine animals in the Southern Ocean provided the phytoplankton with iron-rich excrement, which is essential for the development of diatoms, etc. Scientists speculate that the phytoplankton may have absorbed as much as 1 percent of the iron discharged by the whales. Because of the fertilizing whale, the diatoms flourished, and the krill that fed on them eventually found their way into the whales’ stomachs, where they were recycled into iron-rich excrement.

    An Antarctic Ray of Hope

    However, commercial whaling has disrupted this iron cycle’s delicate equilibrium. It’s possible that there’s a fertilizer scarcity in the Southern Ocean because of the lack of whales. One time, Southern Ocean whales shed 12,000 tons of iron annually. The current estimate is just 1,200 tons. As a result of the 90 percent drop in iron, less phytoplankton bloomed, and krill populations declined for lack of food.

    However, there is still hope for restoring the iron cycle. Scientists believe that bringing back the whale and dolphin populations would help bring back ecological services that were lost in the 20th century, which in turn would increase ocean productivity. The days of superhero plankton and its whale companion working together as they once did could be far off, but it’s possible.

    Algal Blooms

    red Algal bloom edited
    Red algal bloom. (Credit: CeNCOOS)

    Every hero has their flaws, after all. Phytoplankton, which is often overlooked, is essential to life on Earth because it produces oxygen and provides food, yet it can also kill. Specifically, at times of extreme phytoplankton blooms. An algal bloom describes this phenomenon. Extremely hazardous to ecosystems and life forms, this event is occasionally observable from orbit.

    About 300 of the 5,000 known species of marine phytoplankton may briefly arise in such abundance as to visibly stain the sea surface. These blemishes, which may be any color from red to mahogany, brown to even green, can occasionally be so large that they are visible even on satellite photographs.

    The occurrence of algal blooms is a natural occurrence that follows a predictable pattern. As a result of the rising sun radiation in the spring, the diatoms on certain water bodies bloom at the same time. Such widespread reproduction is more typical of other species, which prefer to do it in the middle of summer when seawater is warmer and days are longer. When the plankton die off, so does the bloom. The phytoplankton often dies off because of a trifecta of nutrient depletion, viral infection, and grazing by zooplankton.

    Once the algal bloom has subsided, a second bloom, this time of bacteria, will appear. Bacteria do this breakdown of dead plankton to return nutrients to the environment. This mechanism, for instance, is crucial for the abundance of fish in coastal waters. In turn, viruses and eukaryotic protozoa put an end to bacterial booms.

    The Toxic Plankton and Their Health Effect on Humans

    However, not all algal blooms are harmless. When populations of poisonous plankton species explode, the results may be catastrophic. Some aquatic life, birds, and mammals may perish as a result. Scientists have shown that exposure to them may lead to a variety of negative health effects, including issues with breathing or digestion, memory loss, seizures, lesions, and skin irritation.

    Around 40 species of plankton create poisons that are ingested by people via fish and shellfish. It is not even necessary for the mini-algae to emerge in abnormally high quantities. A few hundred cells per liter of saltwater may be sufficient for certain marine organisms. The species Dinophysis, for instance, may cause diarrhea in humans at this concentration after being “infected” in mussels.

    Toxic algae thrive in summertime
    Toxic algae thrive in summertime. (Credit: Ewg.org)

    Brightly Colored Oxygen Scavengers

    However, during the bloom season, even non-toxic phytoplankton may pose a significant threat. The fact that they suddenly arise in very high quantities is sometimes sufficient alone. The algae then starve fish and other marine life of oxygen because of their high metabolic rate. Furthermore, this happens when bacteria digest the dead algae, a process that uses up oxygen.

    Science thinks that an algal bloom of this sort was originally referenced in the Bible. In one of the seven plagues, “suddenly, the whole [Nile] river turned to blood! The fish in the river died, and the water became so foul that the Egyptians couldn’t drink it,” according to Exodus 7:20–23. It is believed by scientists that fish in the Nile died from a lack of oxygen caused by a bloom of non-toxic, red algae at the time.

    However, algal blooms may inflict significant harm regardless of the time period, and the current level of destruction they produce is far larger than that which occurred even a few decades ago. The reason for this is because people are finding more and more ways to profit from the ocean, such as via the selective cultivation of fish and shellfish.

    When an algal bloom hits a fish farm, it poisons the water and kills thousands of fish that can’t swim away. In Chile, for example, algal blooms triggered a salmon die-off in 2016 with losses of $800 million. There has been a disturbing trend of harmful algal blooms occurring more often in the southern and central regions of the Americas.

    Climate Change and Wastewater

    A rise in water temperature is a contributing factor to the proliferation of hazardous algal blooms. Indeed, hazardous species like cyanobacteria thrive in warm water, displacing other, innocuous algae. El Nino, a circulation anomaly that alters ocean currents every few years, is another factor in the warming of the water alongside climate change. As a result, the water warms up off the coast of western South America. Also, the currents carry hazardous algae farther north, where they thrive.

    But the seas aren’t the only place where deadly algal blooms are on the rise. This problem is exacerbated in still bodies of water like lakes. Due to the increasing water temperatures, the different water layers are no longer able to combine. Toxic cyanobacteria thrive when this circulation is disrupted.

    In addition to a warm, wet climate and enough nutrients in the water, hazardous algal blooms are also encouraged by the overfertilization of water bodies with human excrement. This ended up in many large lakes in Central Europe in the 20th century. There, the sewage filled the water with nutrients that weren’t there before, allowing poisonous phytoplankton to bloom in large numbers.

    Phytoplankton vs. Climate Change

    It’s hard to imagine the seas without plankton, despite the fact that algal blooms may cause monetary losses and health issues. Without phytoplankton, we would lack the oxygen we need to breathe and the fish in our meals. Because of this, monitoring the effects of climate change on these little life-givers is of the utmost importance. The consequences of their demise would be catastrophic.

    The oceans are experiencing a wide range of issues as a result of climate change. Temperatures are rising, acidity levels are rising, and circulation patterns are shifting. Are plankton capable of adjusting to these radical shifts? Researchers have shown that when temperatures rise, phytoplankton populations and species richness decline.

    As climate change continues, it is expected that phytoplankton in warm oceans will suffer the greatest loss of variety. There might be as much as a 30% decline in predicted phytoplankton species in the tropics.

    In consequence, melting sea ice and warmer seas in the polar areas might lead to a 30% increase in animal diversity. And since they thrive in nutrient-poor conditions, experts believe that tiny plankton species will become the norm in subtropical regions and the Southern Ocean. Larger species, however, may flourish in other areas, such as the North Atlantic.

    However, this change creates difficulties for the plankton since the peak population densities of phytoplankton and zooplankton are no longer at the same time. The zooplankton that rely on phytoplankton for food aren’t always there when they bloom. A species of zooplankton in the North Atlantic, for instance, has been shown to reach its population peak eleven days sooner than it did in the past, as noted by researchers. However, it misses out on food and consumption since its phytoplanktonic food sources bloom 27–33 days sooner than they used to.

    Alterations in the species composition of phytoplankton have been documented in several other regions as well. Certain types of cyanobacteria, in particular, do well in water that is warmer and contains more carbon dioxide. However, many types of zooplankton and other micro-marine organisms either do not ingest them or have a hard time using them. Experiments show that, the marine food web is becoming unstable and may eventually collapse.

    More Than Helpless Bystanders

    Plankton is vulnerable to the effects of climate change, but it also has the potential to mitigate these effects. As a byproduct of photosynthesis, phytoplankton removes carbon dioxide from the water, reducing the acidity of the seas. The carbon in the waste products of zooplankton, such as dead bodies and excrement, is stored in sediments, helping to maintain the ocean’s role as a carbon sink.

    Some Southern Ocean plankton species even release the gas dimethyl sulfide, which contributes to the denseness of clouds. Clouds are thus 60% denser than they would be without the plankton effect because this transforms into sulfuric acid droplets in the atmosphere. The clouds’ ability to deflect sunlight helps keep the Southern Ocean area cool.

    Phytoplankton, however, cannot halt climate change. In particular, not all species are equally suited to the current environment. There are additional options that raise CO2 levels rather than decrease them. But the heroic plankton has never failed us in a billion years. And it certainly won’t do it today just because of climate change.

  • How do plants grow towards light?

    In order for plants to make the most of their leaf photosynthesis, they have developed a variety of strategies. The direction in which light is coming in will determine the direction of growth, just as it does with houseplants that are placed in a sunny window. Because of this, they are able to meet their requirements for energy through photosynthesis to the greatest extent possible. But who or what is directing this movement in plants? How are the real, immobile plants able to angle themselves toward the sun even though they are located in the darkest shadows?

    Proteins, stem cells, and phototropism

    It is essential for a plant to direct its growth toward sources of available light while it is still in its immature stages. In the absence of light, many seeds are able to germinate and live off of the starch and fat that they have stored within their bodies. The young plants push their way to the surface of the soil by elongating as much as possible and working against gravity, which serves as their primary source of guidance.

    They do this by using light-detecting proteins, which enable them to bend in the direction of the light to find the shortest path to the sunlight. Adult plants are also able to sway in the direction of the light that is the most intense because their stem cells extend more on the side of the plant that is not directly exposed to light. The term “phototropism” describes the process of growth in response to a light stimulus.

    Auxin is a hormone found in plants that assists in bending

    The well-known scientist Charles Darwin provided the very first in-depth description of plant motion in his seminal work titled “The Power of Movement in Plants,” which was published in the year 1880.

    In 1937, the Dutch researcher Frits Went suggested that the hormone auxin, which is found in plants, might play a role in the process of bending in response to light. Even though numerous subsequent findings have supported the idea that auxin is involved in this process, there was a lack of evidence that for that for quite some time.

    How it works?

    Auxin is the factor responsible for the elongation of these cells. Producing and transmitting this plant hormone is the job of the cells that are located near the tip of the plant shoot. After making its way through the route and stopping at a number of relay stations along the way, it eventually arrives at its final destination, which is the cells on the dark side.

    Auxin is transported from one cell to the next by a complicated network of proteins that act as exporters and importers. This allows the Auxin to reach its final destination. In the presence of auxin, cell division is prompted, and the stem of the plant grows in the direction of the light.

    However, in the absence of the transport proteins, the hormone will be unable to reach its destination. So, what happens when either of these substances is lacking in the body? By inhibiting the export proteins in plants called “PINs,” it is possible to make a plant less sensitive to light.

    Plants like this defy the pull of gravity and continue to grow upward regardless of the direction of sunlight. The same can be achieved by inhibiting the enzyme that was responsible for activating these proteins. And phototropism will once again stop functioning properly. Auxin is the substance that gives plants the power to exhibit phototropism, bending and growing towards the light.

  • Jan Ingenhousz: Physiologist and Discoverer of Photosynthesis

    What did Jan Ingenhousz discover about photosynthesis and how did he make this discovery?

    Jan Ingenhousz discovered the process of photosynthesis, which is the process by which plants convert light energy into chemical energy in the form of organic compounds. He made this discovery through a series of experiments in which he demonstrated that plants release oxygen in the presence of light. This led him to conclude that plants were using light energy to produce oxygen and that this process was critical for their growth and survival.

    What other contributions did Jan Ingenhousz make to the field of plant physiology?

    In addition to his work on photosynthesis, Jan Ingenhousz made several other significant contributions to the study of plants. He conducted experiments on the respiration of plants, and he was the first to recognize the importance of air circulation in the prevention of plant diseases. He also conducted research on the movement of fluids in plants, which laid the foundation for the development of modern plant physiology.

    How did Jan Ingenhousz’s work on plant pathology contribute to the development of modern agriculture?

    Jan Ingenhousz’s work on plant pathology helped to lay the groundwork for the development of modern agriculture by demonstrating the importance of disease prevention and control in the cultivation of crops. His research on the movement of fluids in plants also helped to improve our understanding of how nutrients are transported within plants, which has implications for crop yield and quality.

    What was Jan Ingenhousz’s relationship to other prominent scientists of his time?

    Jan Ingenhousz was a contemporary of several other prominent scientists of his time, including Benjamin Franklin, Joseph Priestley, and Antoine Lavoisier. He corresponded with many of these scientists and shared his findings with them, and his work on photosynthesis and plant physiology was influential in shaping the scientific community’s understanding of these subjects.

    Who is Jan Ingenhousz? Charles Reid Barnes first used the term “photosynthesis” in 1893. But it was Jan Ingenhousz who first discovered and described the fundamental properties of this chemical process a century earlier. In the summer of 1779, Dutch physician Jan Ingenhousz conducted more than 500 detailed experiments at his country house near London and described his findings in Experiments on Vegetables. When his discovery was called “photosynthesis,” the name of the discoverer was long forgotten. Today, he reappears through the mists of time.

    Indeed, Ingenhousz was not only a brilliant experimenter, a gifted medical doctor, and a prolific researcher in chemistry and physics, but also a critical examiner and a multilingual traveler.

    Who Was Jan Ingenhousz?

    Jan Ingenhousz
    Jan Ingenhousz

    Jan Ingenhousz was born in Breda, near the border of what is now Belgium and the Netherlands. As a Catholic, he was denied admission to Protestant universities in his home country, so he crossed the border to Louvain to study medicine. After graduation, he satisfied his curiosity and specialized in courses in gynecology, physiology, agriculture, chemistry, and pharmacology in Paris, Leiden, and Edinburgh. After his father died, he went to England because Sir John Pringle asked him to. He left his growing medical practice in his home city.

    Pringle knew the young and talented Ingenhousz from his time with the British army on the European continent. Pringle was now the well-known author of Diseases of the Army and King George III’s court physician. He introduced Ingenhousz to London’s scientific and political elite. One of them was Benjamin Franklin; he and Ingenhousz became lifelong friends and partners in scientific endeavors.

    In 1766, Jan Ingenhousz participated in a campaign to vaccinate the population against the deadly smallpox epidemic using a live smallpox virus. It was one of the first effective attempts at disease prevention in medical history. Although it was met with considerable resistance, especially in religious circles, it also attracted the attention of the enlightened elite in Europe. Empress Maria Theresia of Austria invited Ingenhousz to visit Vienna to treat her family. The treatment was successful, resulting in Ingenhousz being appointed royal physician and receiving an annual salary for the rest of his life.

    Now wealthy and independent, he traveled throughout Europe, living in London, Paris, and Vienna, and meeting European intellectuals, politicians, and natural philosophers. Meanwhile, he spent long periods at the Wiltshire estate of the Earl of Sherburne, where Joseph Priestley’s laboratory is located and where he discovered oxygen in 1774. Jan Ingenhousz was elected to the Royal Society in 1779 but declined most invitations from other societies. He even turned down an imperial request to head all the universities and libraries in Austria. His fiery criticism of the charlatan Anton Mesmer was a by-product of his relentless quest for reliable knowledge and led to the expulsion of this inventor of “animal magnetism” from Vienna.

    The Mysterious Life of Plants

    The plate from Experiments upon Vegetables describes the audiometer.
    The plate from Experiments upon Vegetables describes the audiometer.

    Above is the plate from Experiments on Vegetables describing the audiometer. This instrument was, in Ingenhousz’s words, “a new method of examining the accurate degree of salubrity of the atmosphere.” “Nitrogenous air” (nitrous oxide) was mixed with an air sample in a glass flask over water. It reacted with the “phlogiston-free air” (oxygen) in the sample, giving off a red fume that dissolved in the water and thus raised the water level. The final water level indicated the amount of oxygen in the sample.

    His pragmatic mind led him to optimize the design of the audiometer. This instrument, which literally “measures the salubrity of the air”, was conceived by Priestley and developed by one of Ingenhousz’s peers, Abbe Fontana. Not only did the instrument become embedded in the roots of environmental science, but it also allowed Ingenhousz to study the gas production of plants. As the title of Ingenhousz’s 1779 book suggests, he understood the essence of this unexpected plant mechanism: “Discovering their great power of purifying the common air in the sunshine and of injuring it in the shade and at night.”

    To put this in modern terminology, plants produce carbohydrates via the hydrogen from the water and the carbon from the air. They get the energy for this process from the sun through the green molecular compound chlorophyll. The waste product of this process is oxygen, which gives life to all creatures, including us. With his experiment, Ingenhousz eliminated all unrelated variables and explained how plants—only the green parts—purify the air by producing phlogiston-free air (oxygen). By comparing the “air” around different plants in the dark, in the sun, and near the stove, he showed that the “salubrity of the air” was “enhanced” not by heat but by sunlight. He also showed that, like all other respiring organisms, they damage the air by producing a “fixed gas” (carbon dioxide). This was best observed in the dark, when oxygen production did not exceed carbon dioxide production.

    The publication of his findings in 1779 sparked a lifelong controversy with Priestley, Jean Senebier, and Willem van Barneveld, who claimed to have discovered them first and tried to prove Ingenhousz’s claims wrong. But with his friend Franklin’s full support, Jan Ingenhousz decided to keep researching and practicing instead of getting into endless arguments.

    Jan Ingenhousz’s Other Works

    He went on to emphasize the vital role of plants in the organization of the earth. He talked about the “plant economy” and explained that it is the force that moves the earth’s ecosystem. With urgent agricultural needs, he experimented with methods of improving plant growth and was elected an honorary member of the Board of Agriculture in London in 1793. Ten years after his groundbreaking description of photosynthesis, in 1789, he changed the way he talked about how plants, sunlight, and the air interact by using Antoine Lavoisier‘s new chemical terms of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen as the photosynthesis ingredients.

    Ingenhousz’s research on photosynthesis was just one of his many endeavors. In 1785, he described the use of the coverslip in the microscope and the random motion of particles in solutions, now known as “Brownian motion.” He studied and published on electrical conductors, machines, and guns; lightning rods and gunpowder; magnetism; the properties of metals; and flammable gas lamps. He was also very interested in the medical applications of new discoveries. He was the first to talk about electroshock therapy for psychiatric disorders. He contributed to Thomas Beddoes’ invention of pneumatic medicine by designing a device for the treatment of various diseases by inhaling oxygen.

    In July 1789, he left Paris to escape the French Revolution and returned to London. Throughout his life, political unrest prevented him from traveling to Vienna and finding his wife. In his last years, he struggled at his drawing table to complete his many experiments and research projects. He corresponded with Edward Jenner, who was inoculating cowpox instead of smallpox, to make a final suggestion for evidence-based medicine. Jenner’s new technique showed promise, but Ingenhousz feared it would be dangerous to use without sufficient evidence of its safety. Jan Ingenhousz died at Bowood House in 1799. It is not known where he is buried in Calne Church.

    References

    1. Geerd Magiels, Dr. Jan Ingenhousz, or why don’t we know who discovered photosynthesis, 1st Conference of the European Philosophy of Science Association 2007
    2. Ingen Housz JM, Beale N, Beale E (2005). “The life of Dr Jan Ingen Housz (1730–99), private counsellor and personal physician to Emperor Joseph II of Austria”. J Med Biogr. 13 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1177/096777200501300106
    3. Dr Jan IngenHousz,or why don’t we know who discovered photosynthesis? by Geerdt Magiel (PDF)