Tag: poland

  • Stanislas Leszczynski: King of Poland and Duke of Lorraine

    Stanislas Leszczynski: King of Poland and Duke of Lorraine

    Elected King of Poland, Stanislas I Leszczyński was forced to give up his throne in 1709 but regained it after the death of Augustus II (1733). While he was supported by France, Spain, Sardinia, and Bavaria, his rival Augustus III (the deceased king’s son) received backing from Russia, Austria, and Saxony. This rivalry led to the War of the Polish Succession (1733-1735), at the end of which Stanislas renounced the Polish throne.

    As compensation, he was granted the duchies of Lorraine and Bar. Constantly forced to flee, he was a philosopher, always in good spirits, and knew how to enjoy life, saying, “He who possesses much is not the happiest: it is he who desires little and knows how to enjoy what he has.” He was also the great-grandfather of three Kings of France: Louis XVI, Louis XVIII, and Charles X.

    Summary of Key Achievements

    • King of Poland (1704–1709 and 1733–1736), though both reigns were marked by political conflict and eventual exile.
    • Duke of Lorraine (1737–1766), where he ruled with great success, promoting education, culture, and social welfare.
    • Cultural contributions, including the construction of the Place Stanislas in Nancy, which remains a symbol of his legacy.
    • His daughter, Marie Leszczynska, became the Queen of France through her marriage to Louis XV, linking Stanislas to one of Europe’s most powerful royal families.

    Early Steps in Politics

    Stanisław Leszczyński
    King Stanisław I Leszczyński of Poland (1677-1766). Credit: Wikimedia, Public Domain

    Stanislas Leszczyński was born on October 20, 1677, into an influential family belonging to the Polish nobility since the 16th century. His father was the Palatine of Poznań and the Grand Treasurer of the Crown, while his mother was the daughter of a renowned general who had defeated the Swedes and Cossacks. He studied in Leszno, Greater Poland, learning sciences, mathematics, and literature, and he spoke Latin, German, Italian, and French fluently. At 18, his educational journey took him to Vienna, Venice, Rome, Florence, and Paris, but he had to cut it short in 1696 due to the death of King John Sobieski.

    Holding the title of Count of Leszno and acting as the governor of Poznań, he made his first political moves and sat in the senate. Stanislas was elected to the diet preparing for the final election of a new king. Facing two tough competitors (the Prince of Conti and the previous king’s son), he withdrew from the final vote and left the throne to the King of Saxony, Frederick Augustus, who was crowned in Krakow in September 1697 as Augustus II. Stanislas had the honor of offering the assembly’s condolences to the widow of King John Sobieski, impressing everyone with his oratory skills.

    At 21, in May 1698, Stanislas married the daughter of a Polish magnate, Catherine Opalińska, who gave him two daughters: Anna in May 1699, and Maria in June 1703. Her dowry included sixty towns and one hundred fifty villages, giving him control of a vast estate when his father, Raphael III, died in 1703.

    Stanislas Leszczyński: The Short-Lived King of Poland

    Charles XII of Sweden refused to accept the alliance that Augustus II had signed with Russia and Denmark against him. Impressed by Stanislas’s good nature, Charles maneuvered to demonstrate Augustus II’s incapacity to rule and install Stanislas on the throne. This was accomplished on October 4, 1705, in Warsaw, but not without difficulty, as Augustus II attempted to kidnap Stanislas! The new King of Poland could rely on his “protector” until 1709, when Charles XII suffered a major defeat in Russia and fled to the Turks. With Russian and Saxon armies advancing on Warsaw, Stanislas had no choice but to abdicate.

    While informing Charles XII, Stanislas took refuge in Stettin and later Stockholm. Unlike the optimistic and victorious Swedish king, Stanislas knew that Poland would suffer more if he persisted. He had lost all his possessions and was now living as a refugee abroad. Meanwhile, Augustus II reclaimed Poland. Despite Charles XII’s insistence to hold on at any cost, Stanislas decided to join him in Turkey during the winter of 1712, disguised as a French officer.

    After a complicated journey, including an arrest upon arrival and a quick release, Stanislas convinced the Swedish king to accept his abdication. In a moment of understanding, Charles XII offered him the Duchy of Zweibrücken in Germany as he waited to reclaim his Polish kingdom.

    Stanislas traveled back through Vienna and Lorraine. In Lunéville, in need, he pawned his jewels. Despite using the alias “Count of Cronstein,” he was recognized by Mr. de Beauvau, loyal to the Duke of Lorraine, who allowed him to keep his jewels and lent him the estimated amount.

    By early July 1714, Stanislas arrived in Zweibrücken and found an old castle. The income was 70,000 écus, but 400 Swedish troops in the garrison consumed much of it. Always good-natured, Stanislas adapted to this situation, and three months later, he brought over his wife and two daughters. He embraced this new peaceful life, despite the premature death of his eldest daughter in June 1717.

    In Poland, Charles XII continued to push for Stanislas to reclaim the throne, although Augustus II attempted to capture him again in August 1717. After Charles XII’s death in late 1718, Stanislas was forced to relocate, first near Landau, then to Wissembourg in 1719, thanks to Regent Philippe d’Orléans, who granted him a pension of 4,000 livres a month. The Duke of Lorraine lent him an additional 30,000 livres

    Lacking the funds to settle, Stanislas pawned his jewels again and proposed to Augustus II: he was ready to give up his crown if he could recover his property. He needed to marry off his second daughter, who had just turned 18. Suitors were scarce due to the family’s poverty, but Stanislas made peace with the situation, enjoying a happy affair with a French officer’s wife, philosophizing, hunting, and savoring the simple pleasures of life.

    Father-in-Law to Louis XV

    In France, after the departure of the Spanish Infanta, who was too young, seventeen candidates remained for Louis XV’s marriage, from an initial ninety-seven. Either they were not Catholic or, like Stanislas’s daughter, were too poor. The Duke of Bourbon, serving as regent after the death of Philippe d’Orléans, offered to marry Marie, and Stanislas was pleased with the outcome. In February 1725, a portrait painter for the royal court arrived and left with Marie’s portrait.


    In early April, the Duke of Bourbon asked for her hand… on behalf of the King of France!

    As Stanislas fainted, France was taken aback, but Louis XV was pleased with the portrait: “neither beautiful nor pretty, but with a fresh complexion, lively eyes, cultured, gentle in character, and kind-hearted like her father.” When Stanislas recovered, he reclaimed his pawned jewels with the help of a 13,000 livres loan from the Strasbourg government.

    The marriage took place by proxy on August 15. Stanislas received good news in early September, thinking, “I lost the Polish throne, but my future grandson will ascend the throne of France,” and radiated with happiness. In 1729, Louis XV settled his in-laws at Chambord with a modest pension, but the castle was empty. Accustomed to having little, Stanislas managed his funds wisely, leaving much of the castle unfurnished. Life unfolded quietly between his devout wife, his mother indulging herself, his forest walks, and his readings. “We live in great tranquility, which makes my life sweet,” he said, having long given up on the Polish throne, as no one in France would act while Augustus II was still alive.

    Stanislas Leszczynski Regains His Throne of Poland…

    August II died in February 1733, and several candidates for the Polish throne emerged, including his son August III and Stanislas Poniatowski, a former loyal supporter of Stanislas Leszczynski. The Marquis de Monti, French ambassador to Poland, made every effort to help Stanislas reclaim his throne despite his exile. With the support of sympathizers, Monti spared no expense, explaining that Stanislas had the backing of the King of France, who would never invade Poland even though neighboring countries (Austria, Prussia, Russia) were threatening. He even assured that France was ready to defend Poland in case of an invasion by any member of the Treaty of the Three Black Eagles (Germany, Russia, and Prussia, who sought to prevent any Polish claimant from ascending the throne).

    By March 1733, Monti requested that France send Stanislas to Poland, but he hesitated. While confident about reclaiming his throne, Stanislas was unsure of the reception he would receive from the Polish people. Brave and clear-sighted, he realized he didn’t have the support of the French Prime Minister; if war broke out, he couldn’t count on France’s aid. In August 1733, Stanislas set sail from Brest but was stopped in Copenhagen by the Tsarina, who blocked the roads.

    Eventually, he disguised himself as a German merchant’s clerk and traveled by postal carriage. He arrived on September 8, just days before the election on September 11, which Monti had masterfully organized. On September 10, Stanislas was recognized leaving the embassy, and the public was ecstatic—no one had expected his presence! The next day, he was unanimously elected, with only three abstentions. Meanwhile, 5,000 Polish soldiers deserted!

    A Master of Escapes

    Barely elected and knowing the Russian army was advancing, Stanislas engaged in two glorious battles. But faced with the overwhelming number of attackers and lacking a regular army, he left Warsaw on September 22, heading to Danzig, where he awaited help from France.

    That help would never arrive. Louis XV had decided to declare war on Emperor Charles VI (an ally of the Russians invading Poland), stationing his troops on the German-Italian border. Thus began the “War of the Polish Succession.” On October 5, 1733, August III was crowned with the support of 40,000 Russians, 20,000 Saxons ravaging the country, and 36,000 soldiers advancing on Danzig!

    Finally, reinforcements arrived in April 1734—but with only 1,950 men, each with 20 bullets!


    They quickly retreated, showing “good sense” in the face of the overwhelming enemy forces. As the Russians issued an ultimatum—”For the freedom of Danzig, hand over the King of Poland or let him flee”—the city continued to fight despite the soldiers’ exhaustion. In late June, the ambassador organized an evacuation plan: slipping past enemy posts, crossing the Vistula River, and reaching Prussia.

    Furious that Cardinal Fleury had refused to send more help, Stanislas fled once again, maintaining his good humor. Assisted by a Swedish general, both disguised as peasants, he undertook a perilous journey. Along the way, the Polish king, who was also the French king’s father-in-law, was reprimanded by his guides. This was no time for royal airs—it was no longer about keeping the throne but saving his life, as enemies were everywhere, and a hefty reward had been offered for his capture, “dead or alive.”

    The escape took over a week, traversing canals and moving from farm to farm, hidden in carts covered with goods. Eventually, he reached safety and was welcomed by the King of Prussia in Königsberg in early July. Frederick William I offered him an honor guard and a respectable pension. A few days later, Danzig capitulated, and Stanislas’ small band of loyalists was imprisoned in a castle near Marienburg by the Russian army.

    In Versailles, no one dared tell the Queen of France the full story, to the point where pamphlets were printed in support of Stanislas! Meanwhile, the King of France signed a famous treaty known as the Pragmatic Sanction: Francis III, Duke of Lorraine, married Maria Theresa of Habsburg, ending the War of Polish Succession. France acquired the duchies of Bar and Lorraine, intending to install Stanislas there!

    Stanislas Leszczynski Rules Over the Duchies of Bar and Lorraine

    After two years of negotiations, Stanislas Leszczynski signed his abdication to the Polish throne on January 27, 1736, pressured and forced by Versailles. Even his daughter urged him to accept, explaining that Lorraine was close by, and though it wasn’t Poland, it was still a duchy where he wouldn’t be a king without a throne. Forced to sign the “secret declaration of Meudon” in early June, which stated, “His Polish Majesty, not wishing to burden himself with the administration of the finances and revenues of the duchies of Bar and Lorraine, leaves that responsibility to the King of France, from now and forever,” Stanislas was granted an annual income of 2,000,000 livres, a chancellor to manage affairs, and the honorary title of King of Poland. Stanislas would reign without ruling! As was his nature, he accepted this with philosophical grace.

    Antoine Chaumont de la Galaizière, urged by Cardinal Fleury, took control of the duchies in February and March 1737, wielding full power. Stanislas made his official entrance into Lunéville on April 3 before a reluctant populace but reunited with an old acquaintance, Mr. de Beauvau, who had crossed his path 23 years earlier and set him up in his private mansion. Stanislas was happy and busied himself with restoring Lunéville Castle, which was uninhabitable, and furnishing the Bar Castle. Who would have thought he would reign over his duchies for 29 years and be beloved?

    Stanislas “the Benevolent”

    From the moment he arrived, though unwelcome, Stanislas Leszczynski got to work, establishing his Council of State, Finance, and Commerce. He spent his money on charitable works, fought against famine, created a form of social security to cope with unforeseen events like accidents, illness, or disability, and set up free legal consultations for the poor. In 1748, he founded an order of the Brothers of Schools and contributed to school maintenance, ensuring free education for several schools in Nancy. This kind man “smoothed the rough edges” when his chancellor imposed French laws.

    Everything went smoothly until 1740 when the War of Austrian Succession began. Three years later, despite French armies stationed in Strasbourg, Stanislas fled Lunéville as the Germans advanced, seeking refuge in Metz. In 1746, he returned to Lorraine and took care of his castle, which had burned down in 1744. Queen Catherine died in March 1747, and the Marquise de Boufflers, nicknamed “the Lady of Pleasure,” became his mistress. Stanislas enjoyed life and, thanks to his passion for desserts, invented the “baba”: finding the kouglof too dry, he soaked it in rum. He was reunited with old escape companions: Thyange, the Chevalier de Solignac, Tercier, and he welcomed Montesquieu in 1747 and Voltaire in 1748-1749. His court was “more breathable” than Versailles, a haven of peace with a love for intellectual pursuits!

    Architect of Lunéville and Nancy

    Major works were undertaken at the Château de Lunéville, where he even created a throne room. He redesigned the gardens, installed a Turkish-inspired kiosk, a pavilion in the Chinese style, and in 1742, added a series of 88 automatons at the “Rock.” He also had the “Chartreuses” built for his favorite courtiers so they could host salons. Visitors came from far away to admire these wonders of Lunéville. All of this was gradually destroyed by Louis XV after the death of Stanislas, as the king wanted to transform the château into a military barracks!

    In Nancy, he built the Church of Notre Dame de Bonsecours in 1738, unified the medieval Old Town and the New Town, and used his own funds to develop the Royal Square (future Place Stanislas), which was inaugurated in 1755. He also created a large public library, a Royal Society of Sciences and Fine Letters in 1750, and the Royal College of Medicine in 1752.

    A Fatal Day for Lorraine

    On February 5, 1766, Stanislas Leszczynski got too close to the fireplace, and the fur robe (a gift from his daughter) he was wearing caught fire. He tried to extinguish the flames but fell into the blaze.


    By the time the guard managed to enter the room, it was too late: one side of Stanislas’s body was burned, and one of his hands was charred.

    Stanislas died seventeen days later, on February 23, 1766, at the age of 88. His remains rest in the crypt of the Church of Notre Dame de Bonsecours, alongside his wife, Catherine Opalinska.

    Following the agreements made with Louis XV, Nancy became part of France, and in 1831, the population installed a statue in his honor at the center of the Royal Square, with the inscription: “To Stanislas the Benefactor, from grateful Lorraine.”

  • Christmas in Poland: Traditions, Celebrations, and History

    Christmas in Poland: Traditions, Celebrations, and History

    One of the most important festivals observed on December 25 in Poland is Christmas, which is known as Boże Narodzenie (“Birth of God”) in Polish. Although most Poles see Christmas more as a secular family celebration than a religious one, everyone celebrates the holiday in their own unique way. Most Polish people’s idea of a good Christmas is spending time with loved ones. Before breaking the Christmas wafer, Poles meet for a communal feast on Christmas Eve, December 24. They swap presents and best wishes. The Christmas Mass, or “pasterka,” is celebrated in churches on the evenings of December 24th and 25th. Christmas markets are held in several Polish cities all through December.

    See also: 48 Countries That Celebrate Christmas Widely

    Advent

    A four-week season of fasting and preparation known as Advent precedes Christmas in Poland, as it does in other Catholic nations. During this season, Christians are encouraged by the Catholic Church to repent and do acts of kindness. Compared to an earlier figure of almost 90%, today, 70% of Poles are Catholic.

    Polish churches celebrate morning masses honoring the Virgin Mary, known as “Roraty” (a votive mass), every day of Advent (with the exception of Sundays). The service starts at the crack of dawn, with the only light from the parishioners’ candles.

    Important Advent Symbols:

    1. Advent wreaths: Advent wreaths crafted from fir branches and embellished with candles, illuminated one by one throughout the season.
    2. Christmas calendar: Traditional Christmas calendars would start counting down the days until Christmas Eve at the start of Advent.
    3. Christmas lanterns: Square or rectangular Christmas lanterns adorned with biblical images or Christian motifs. A light bulb or candle is placed within.

    Christmas Eve: Sochelnik

    December 24th, often known as Christmas Eve (Sochelnik in Polish) is related with many Christmas rituals. The majority of Poles take the day off from work, and businesses close early or stay open for a reduced schedule.

    Traditionally, on Christmas Eve, the Poles gather with their families to celebrate. As soon as the first star appears in the sky, devout families start reading the Bible and praying. This is in observance of the Star of Bethlehem, which, according to the New Testament, led the magi to the infant Jesus.

    Polish Christmas wafer opłatek.
    Polish Christmas wafer opłatek. Diego Delso, cc by sa, enhanced.

    As is customary, the Christmas wafer (opłatek) is passed around and wishes exchanged. It is a thin Polish tradition of a rectangular loaf of unleavened bread or waffle. Instead of coloring them as in the past, it’s now traditional to bake white wafers with embossed designs of Christmas scenes. Christians remember the sacrament of the Eucharist by the practice of breaking the wafer, which also represents unity and reconciliation.

    -> See also: All 15 Countries That Don’t Celebrate Christmas

    Family members who are unable to join the celebration often send wafers over the mail as a token of their importance to the custom. After then, one seat remains empty at the table while all the participants take their seats. The seat is saved for an unnamed visitor and the host is prepared to welcome and feed any stranger this evening. Furthermore, a particular setting is laid out on the table in honor of family members who have passed away.

    The Polish traditionally have two courses prepared for the Christmas table: one for those who fast and one for those who consume meat. Due to the continued fasting on December 24th, no meat is served until the following day. Fasting supper on Christmas Eve is the most important celebratory meal, but the diversity and complexity of the dishes more than make up for the constraints. There should be twelve dishes, representing the number of apostles, and everyone at the table is expected to sample them all, according to tradition.

    Typical starters for the feast include borscht with dumplings or mushroom soup, followed by pies, dumplings, stewed cabbage, different fish dishes, gingerbread, kutya with nuts, raisins, and honey, and a compote of dried fruits for dessert. In remembrance of the manger where Jesus was laid, a little amount of hay is often put underneath the white tablecloth that covers the table. Even though the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith decided in 2003 that Christmas Eve fasting is not obligatory, most Polish Christians nevertheless follow the customary fasting.

    Pasterka: “The Shepherds’ Mass”

    In remembrance of the shepherds who came to worship the infant Jesus Christ, many Poles attend church on the evenings of December 24th and 25th for the Christmas service, which is referred to as “Shepherd’s Mass” or “Pasterka” (from the word “pasterz” meaning shepherd). Even though Christians have been holding night services since the fifth century, the practice almost died out in Western Europe during the eighteenth century.

    Two centuries later, during the pontificate of John Paul II, the Catholic Church resumed the tradition of celebrating night Mass in Poland, making it one of the few nations that maintained this practice. At midnight (or perhaps earlier), Polish churches hold Pasterka, which lasts for about 1.5 hours.

    Every church has a traditional Christmas crib where the priest traditionally sets a figurine of the Baby Jesus during the ceremony. There is an air of seriousness in the liturgical songs sung throughout this Mass. Several thousand Christians are drawn to the Shepherd’s Mass at the Jasna Góra Monastery in Częstochowa, which is the greatest gathering of its kind.

    Christmas Traditions in Poland

    Holiday Decorations and Present Exchange

    Podłaźniczka, the Polish upside-down Christmas tree tradition.
    Podłaźniczka, the Polish upside-down Christmas tree tradition. Ciacho5, cc by sa 4.0, enhanced.

    Polish Christmas trees and streets are decked up with multicolored lights, much as in other European countries. This is especially meaningful for Catholics on Christmas Eve, when the tree is decked up with beautiful ornaments to represent the tree of paradise bearing fruits, and December 24th is the day Adam and Eve were created.

    It is another common practice to exchange gifts on Christmas Eve (December 24th). Tradition holds that Saint Nicholas bestows presents upon children in Poland; however, the specific figure may differ depending on where one lives. In Western Poland, it is Gwiazdor (meaning “star” in Polish), in Lesser Poland, an angel, in the southwest of Poland, asterisk or little star, and in Silesia, the Baby Jesus. Also, Polish Orthodox Christians are visited by the famous Russian figure Ded Moroz (“Father Frost”).

    Caroling and Music

    1. Bóg się rodzi (God Is Born), the text of which was written in 1792 by Franciszek Karpiński.
    2. Lulajże Jezuniu (Sleep Jesus), a 17th century children’s song.
    3. W żłobie leży (Infant Holy, Infant Lowly), 16th-17th century Christmas carol, with text attributed to the Polish writer Piotr Skarga (1536–1612).

    Polish Christmas music traditionally features carols, of which over 1,500 have been officially recorded in Poland. Historians of music generally agree that the composition and performance of celebratory songs describing the birth of Jesus started in Poland somewhere between the late fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries. ‘Zdrow bądź, krolu anielski’ (‘Hail, Angelic King’) is the first line of the oldest surviving Polish Christmas song, which goes back to 1424. Carols range from very serious to more lighthearted, with lyrics that might be sarcastic or comical.

    ‘Oj, maluśki, maluśki’ (‘Oh, little one, little one’), ‘Dzisiaj w Betlejem’ (‘Today in Bethlehem’), ‘Gdy śliczna Panna’ (‘When the Beautiful Virgin’), and the world-renowned ‘Silent Night’ are among the most famous carols. Starting on Christmas Eve and continuing through the night Mass on Christmas Day, carols are sung until February 2.

    On December 26, the feast of Saint Stephen the First Martyr, which falls on the second day of Christmas, Poles start caroling, performing house-to-house carol concerts. There was a time when people thought that caroling helped bring about the springtime blooms in nature, and now many think that singing brings good fortune and harmony to the home. Carolers would often travel with domestic animals, but as time went on, they would often be joined by people dressed as similar animals, such as bulls, goats, horses, etc.

    Similarly, it was common practice to dress like figures from the Bible, most notably King Herod and the Magi. A huge, multicolored star strung from a pole is known as a “star procession,” and it is still a popular tradition. Giving carolers refreshments or a little money is common practice; sometimes, the gathered monies are used for charity causes. It is common practice for Polish Catholic priests to visit the homes of their parishioners either before or after Christmas to sing carols and socialize with the congregation. There are distinct traditions for caroling in each area of Poland.

    Nativity Scenes

    nativity scene
    ©Malevus

    Lithuanian Christmas nativities, called szopka in Polish, have been around since the Middle Ages. During the Christmas season, they are placed in every church and portray the scene of Christ’s birth. The szopka of Krakow has become a well-known and unique folk-art style. Usually depicting one of Krakow’s famous locations, these two-tiered sculptures show biblical figures on the upper level and historical or current individuals on the lower level. On the first Thursday of December, the Market Square hosts a szopka competition, the winner of which is chosen by the Krakow Historical Museum.

    Competitors range from students and other novices to seasoned artisans who have honed their techniques over the years and passed them on to their descendants. As of 2018, the Krakow szopka was officially recognized as an intangible cultural heritage by UNESCO. Particularly noteworthy are the nativities in Kudowa and Olsztyn, which also have a high number of figurines and moving parts, and the biggest nativity in Europe, housed inside a church.

    The nativities in the hamlet of Wambierzyce comprise 800 wooden figures, 300 of which are animated. The dimensions of the structure—59 feet in height, 115 feet in width, and 33 feet in depth—are those of the Franciscan Cathedral in Katowice.

    Holiday Markets

    Christmas markets are a December tradition in most Polish towns, and they’re becoming more and more popular every year. Decorative and applied art, knitted socks, a variety of confectionery, jewelry, and Christmas decorations are all for sale in tents or wooden cottages. Kids may enjoy rides, carousels, and other forms of entertainment. In a typical Polish market, you may have grilled ‘oscypek,’ a cheese from Polish highlanders, accompanied with cranberry jam. Warsaw, Wroclaw, Krakow, Gdansk, and Katowice all have enormous and stunning markets, however the exact times vary from city to city.

    Christmas Foods in Poland

    Guests from outside the family were required to have one empty seat at the Christmas Eve supper since the number of courses had to be odd (often thirteen) and the number of table settings had to be even. Instead of meat, there should be twelve vegetarian options on the Christmas Eve menu (to represent the following year’s months). Some examples of these dishes include seafood macaroni, filled dumplings, carp, cabbage with peas, and mushroom soup.

    Sweet Treats

    1. Opłatek: ‘Opłatek,’ a delicate wafer adorned with a religious picture, is a traditional Polish dessert. It is customary for the family patriarch to give out opłatek to all members of the family and the cattle in the days leading up to the Christmas Eve meal. The act of sharing opłatek within a family represents selflessness and the readiness to divide up the rewards of everyday labor. Although the practice of serving opłatek to families has its roots in the 18th century, the custom of making it in the Middle Ages is far older.
    2. Kutya: Wheat, hazelnuts, raisins, and honey are the main ingredients of kutya, a traditional Polish Christmas dessert.
    3. Piernik: Piernik, a honey cake in a variety of shapes (heart, animal, or St. Nicholas) is also a traditional Polish Christmas treat.
    4. Makowiec: Polish poppy seeds, or “mak” in Polish, represent joy and plenty and they are a hallmark of this traditional Christmas dessert.

    Christmas Drinks

    Traditionally, dried fruits (such as plums) are used to make kompot, a traditional Polish Christmas drink.

    Polish Christmas Folk Traditions

    Szopka, Nativity Scene: Polish Christmas traditions revolve on the nativity scene, or “szopka,” which is put up throughout the holiday season. The practice of making little houses adorned with Nativity scenes and placing them under the Christmas tree became popular among Krakow’s masons and laborers in the 18th century as a means of supplementing their income. Krakow hosts an annual competition to crown the most exquisite nativity displays. The “puppet nativity scene,” is a unique kind of Polish nativity scene that has its roots in the 18th-century arrangement by Polish priests. A similar tradition is seen in Hungary and Ukraine.

    The First Star: As soon as the first star of Christmas Eve appears in the sky, the traditional Christmas Eve feast is started. This relates to the Star of Bethlehem, which the three wise men supposedly saw in the sky when they came to see the baby Jesus. At the beginning of the meal, someone reads a portion about Jesus’ birth from either Matthew or Luke’s Gospel.

    Hay Under the Tablecloth: Traditionally, a handful of hay is placed beneath the white tablecloth. This tradition has its roots in pagan times, when it was associated with an old agricultural celebration; the pagan idea was that it would bring prosperity to the household in the next year. Jesus was born into poverty, and the hay represents that.

    An Extra Seat at the Table: It is common practice to reserve one more seat at the table in comparison to the total number of guests. This act represents holding a seat for someone who shows up unannounced, paying tribute to a loved one who has passed away, or honoring someone who is unable to attend.

    Christmas Tree: Polish Christmas trees had their origins in the 18th century, when the custom was brought to the country. ‘Podłaźniczka,’ a comparable tradition that existed prior to the Christmas tree, included suspending the fir tree’s top from a beam or the barn door. Polish nationalists responded to the arrival of the German Christmas tree custom by designing ornaments based on Polish folklore.

    Pajaki: Traditional embellishments also include ‘pająki,’ which are stars or eggs that have been adorned.

    Gift Bearers: “The Star Men, or ‘gwiazdor,’” are one of the traditional gift-givers with Santa Claus.

  • Why Did the Partitions of Poland Happen?

    Why Did the Partitions of Poland Happen?

    Roughly three hundred years ago, Poland stood as a sprawling empire, stretching far beyond its modern-day boundaries to encompass regions that now constitute Ukraine, Belarus, and Lithuania. Strong nations like Russia, Austria, and Prussia sought after this vast expanse of land as a prize. However, the once-mighty Kingdom of Poland underwent a series of partition events that ultimately led to its dismantlement and the contraction of its territory to its present limits.

    Key Takeaways: Partitions of Poland

    • The partitions involved three major powers: Russia, Prussia, and Austria. They exploited the weakening Commonwealth to seize and divide its lands.
    • The first partition occurred in 1772, resulting in significant territorial losses for Poland, with Russia, Prussia, and Austria gaining sizable portions of Polish territory.
    • The second partition took place in 1793, further diminishing the Commonwealth’s size and power. Poland’s sovereignty was significantly eroded.
    • The third partition occurred in 1795, effectively eliminating the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth from the map. The remaining Polish lands were divided among the three partitioning powers.
    • Poland finally regained independence after World War I, with the Treaty of Versailles (1919) recognizing the reconstituted Polish state.

    Partitions of the Kingdom of Poland

    Partitions of Poland (1772-1795).
    Partitions of Poland (1772-1795). Image: Reddit.

    The process of partitioning Poland unfolded in three distinct phases, each orchestrated by the aforementioned powers. The First Partition occurred in 1772, when Russia, Prussia, and Austria seized substantial portions of Polish territory, significantly reducing its landmass and geopolitical influence. The Second Partition transpired in 1793, further eroding Polish sovereignty as Russia and Prussia acquired additional slices of its land.

    The final blow was dealt through the Third Partition in 1795, as the three dominant powers collectively carved up the remaining vestiges of the Kingdom of Poland, extinguishing its status as an independent entity. The strategic interests and ambitions of these neighboring powers converged in their pursuit of territorial expansion, resulting in the eventual reduction of Poland to its current borders.

    In light of the ongoing memorial disputes between Warsaw and Moscow that have grown more intense as a result of the Ukraine conflict, the third partition of Poland, which took place on October 24, 1795, has become a prominent topic today once again.

    On that day, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, formed since the Treaty of Lublin in 1569, was wiped off the map. It was only after World War I that the two entities—Poland and Lithuania—would regain their independence, albeit separately.

    A Buffer Zone for Diverse Cultures

    Szlachta in costumes of the Voivodeships of the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth
    Szlachta in costumes of the Voivodeships of the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth. (W. Commons)

    During the mid-18th century, significant concerns arose among the prominent European courts regarding the vulnerability and potential dissolution of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. This expansive entity, at its zenith, stretched across nearly 400,000 square miles (1 million km2), primarily comprising vast plains and dense forests.

    The Commonwealth, acting as a buffer zone devoid of distinct natural demarcations, found itself wedged between three expansionist powers: Austria, Prussia, and Russia.

    The Commonwealth had an estimated population of over 11 million people, which distinguished it for its diversity. This population mosaic was defined by rich ethnicities, languages, and religious affiliations. Within its boundaries coexisted Poles, Lithuanians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Tatars, and Jews, along with a myriad of Greek, Armenian, and German communities.

    Predominantly agrarian, the majority of the populace resided in rural settings, engaging in agricultural pursuits. In terms of urbanization, major hubs such as Warsaw, Krakow, and Lviv stood as exceptions, as the presence of significant urban centers was comparatively limited.

    The essence of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth lied within its aristocratic foundation, characterized by a pronounced subordination to the szlachta, the omnipotent Polish nobility.

    This aristocratic class wielded exclusive control over wealth, prestige, and political authority, invoking a Sarmatian ideology: the szlachta traces its lineage to the valiant warrior people of the Sarmatians, who famously resisted the might of the Roman Empire.

    This doctrine fostered a martial ethos that exalted the feats of forebears. This sentiment materialized as an air of superiority toward outsiders and a disdain for peasants, as well as a general disregard for individuals whose livelihood stemmed from manual labor.

    A Multiplicity of Weaknesses and Bottlenecks

    Economy

    On the economic front, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth faced significant challenges due to the persistence of serfdom and a chronic lack of investment in infrastructure.

    While neighboring countries such as Austria, Prussia, and Russia were able to establish strong centralized states that modernized their economies, Polish leaders struggled to enhance agricultural productivity and stimulate the growth of trade and manufacturing.

    The ownership of lands was divided between the Crown (15%) and the magnates, who represented the high nobility (85%); nevertheless, a substantial portion of the szlachta, or lesser nobility, remained without landownership.

    In Poland-Lithuania, a lot of peasants seemed to have deteriorated in the first half of the 18th century, mainly as a result of heavier corvée duties. The country’s economy was largely non-monetary, with strong autarkic attitudes and gift-giving practices.

    Serfs retained only a modest share of what they produced, while magnates reveled in opulent celebrations that cemented their influence. These magnates often delegated tasks to less affluent nobles, who struggled to uphold the extravagant lifestyles of their social peers.

    Legal Matters and Governance

    In terms of legal matters, Poland-Lithuania faced an intricate web of customary practices, royal decrees, and laws established by the Diet (Sejm). Despite various attempts at codification, the country grappled with challenges in harmonizing its civil and criminal laws. This lack of uniformity contributed to a pronounced social hierarchy that primarily benefited the nobility, especially the magnates.

    However, the latter part of the 18th century brought about significant improvements in the legal landscape. Notably, lords’ authority over life and death concerning serfs was curtailed in 1767, and measures were implemented to prohibit torture and witchcraft trials in 1776.

    Politically, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth operated under a unique hybrid system that blended elements of nobiliary republicanism and elective monarchy.

    This arrangement, though distinctive, often led to significant obstacles and dysfunction. The political participation of aristocratic citizens was channeled through district assemblies responsible for local affairs and the selection of envoys. These envoys, or deputies, represented their constituencies in the upper assembly of the kingdom known as the Diet, which convened every two years.

    The Diet served as a central institution of the republic, bringing together the king and the two chambers: the Senate and the Chamber of Envoys.

    Within this assembly, important decisions were made, including the enactment of laws, taxation policies, declarations of war, the negotiation and approval of treaties, and the designation of the king.

    This unique political structure attempted to strike a balance between monarchical authority and the influence of the nobility, resulting in a system that was both intricate and subject to various challenges and inefficiencies.

    Within the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, the king held a position of authority and played a crucial role in the political structure, although his powers were shared with the rest of the Diet. The king fulfilled specific functions that included proposing and sanctioning laws, leading the army, conducting diplomatic affairs, appointing public officials, and convening assemblies.

    To assist in governance, the monarch appointed ministers who held lifetime positions. These ministers, including roles such as marshals, generals, treasurers, and chancellors, acted as advisors to the king and also served as counterbalances to his authority. Their presence helped mitigate the concentration of power in the hands of the king and ensured a degree of checks and balances within the political system.

    Additionally, the king had interactions with the Senate, which was composed of bishops and provincial administrators such as palatines and castellans. The Senate’s role included advising and monitoring the king’s actions and providing further oversight of the monarch’s decisions and activities. This complex interplay of powers and institutions was a defining feature of the political landscape within the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

    Liberum veto

    Partition Sejm's exit from the Senate chamber on 30 September 1773, in effect proclaiming, "Murder me, not Poland." Painting by Jan Matejko, 1866
    Szlachcic sejmik representative Tadeusz Rejtan (bottom right) with the right to override the Sejm session (Liberum veto), trying to stop the First Partition of Poland on September 30, 1773. (Image: Jan Matejko, 1866)

    The szlachta (nobility) consistently made an effort to increase their privileges and influence over public affairs, particularly through the use of the liberum veto, which left its mark on the political landscape of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

    This mechanism was based on the principle of unanimous voting in the Diet, where any single deputy could veto a bill or dissolve the entire assembly, nullifying all decisions made during the session. While designed to uphold the equality of political rights for all nobles, the repeated use of the liberum veto led to the paralysis of parliamentary work and hindered the effective functioning of institutions.

    As a result, a small number of prominent magnate families, including the Czartoryski, Potocki, Radziwill, Branicki, and Poniatowski, among others, began to dominate and turn the intended noble democracy, which was supposed to be the backbone of the political system, into an oligarchy.

    On the military front, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth faced structural disadvantages. Its regular army was relatively small, consisting of around 10,000 men. While the liberum veto could prevent the mass mobilization of nobles for military purposes, the possibility of raising an army still existed.

    However, the Polish army was ill-equipped to compete with the powerful and well-organized armies of its neighboring countries. Contemporary observers and travelers frequently emphasized the Commonwealth’s military weaknesses by highlighting its sluggishness and lack of mobility in various domains.

    Reform Efforts Failed to Prevent Collapse

     Stanisław August Poniatowski
    Stanisław August Poniatowski, King of Poland and Lithuania. Image: Met Museum.

    The Diet chose Stanisław August Poniatowski (1732–1798) to assume the thrones of King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania on September 6, 1764. This decision was orchestrated by his former lover, Empress Catherine II of Russia (Catherine the Great – 1729–1796) and resulted in him being perceived as a marionette under the control of the Tsarina, significantly undermining his legitimacy from the outset.

    Nonetheless, he was more than a mere subservient instrument of Russia. This enlightened ruler aspired to carry forward the reformative strategies initiated by the Czartoryski family, with the intention of enhancing the effectiveness of the Polish state. This would involve replacing the prevailing system, which had led to disorder within this aristocratic republic, with a genuine monarchy.

    The disputed election in 1764 resulted in Stanisław August Poniatowski becoming the (last) King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania.
    The disputed election in 1764 resulted in Stanisław August Poniatowski becoming the (last) King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania. Image: Bernardo Bellotto (1722–1780). (W. Commons)

    Poland stood out among the limited European nations practicing authentic religious tolerance, albeit without the inclusion of equitable legal standing for varying religious factions. The privileged “dissident” nobility (Protestants and Orthodox believers) advocated for equivalent privileges akin to those enjoyed by Catholics.

    This plea aligned with the agendas of the Prussian faction (Protestants) and the Russian faction (Orthodox), who provided their backing. On the other hand, Catholic aristocrats were against the idea of parity. They knew that accepting parity, which was made possible by the liberum veto mechanism, could make them dependent on the dissident faction and, by extension, open to Russia and Prussia’s influence.

    catherine the great (catherine ii)
    Catherine II (Catherine the Great.)

    In the year 1767, Nicholas Vasilyevich Repnin (1734–1801), serving as the Russian envoy in Warsaw, adeptly navigated the proceedings of the Diet to strategically shape the multifaceted conflict. This conflict, extending beyond mere religious dimensions, was carefully channeled through the establishment of confederations.

    A confederation signified a lawful political framework designed to unite nobles in a coalition aimed at safeguarding the republic against both internal and external threats.

    Repnin actively promoted the establishment of three distinct confederations: one in Słuck dedicated to the Orthodox adherents, another in Toruń embracing the Protestants, and a third in Radom representing conservative Catholics who stood in opposition to the reform initiatives spearheaded by Stanisław August Poniatowski.

    The outcomes of these initiatives culminated in a remarkable Diet (Sejm) held during the period of 1767–1768. This assembly witnessed the extension of parity in rights to non-Catholic factions, alongside the formal acknowledgment of Catherine II as the guardian of “Polish liberties.”

    A significant milestone occurred on February 24, 1768, with the signing of a perpetual and amicable treaty of assurance between Russia and Poland.

    Within this agreement, the Tsarina pledged her commitment to preserving Poland’s political structures and territorial integrity. Consequently, the entirety of the Republic of the Two Nations (“Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth”) found itself ensnared in a state of dependence on Russia.

    1229px Poland Caricature of Catherine II of Russia
    Caricature of Catherine II of Russia, a drawing from the Silva Rerum journal for the years 1768-1772 concerning the Bar confederation. (Image: W. Commons)

    In response to this de facto tutelage, a new confederation emerged in the town of Bar on February 29, 1768, with the primary goal of safeguarding the homeland and upholding the Catholic faith. Significantly, both France and the Ottoman Empire rallied behind the Bar Confederation, offering their support.

    A pivotal turning point occurred when, prompted by an atrocity committed by pro-Russian factions within its borders, the Ottoman Empire declared hostilities against Russia on October 6, 1768. This event marked the moment when the Polish insurrection transformed into a multifaceted conflict encompassing both internal strife and international confrontation.

    The current situation, characterized by Russian territorial expansion, was aligned with the strategic interests of both Austria and Prussia. However, the course of events saw a proliferation of military setbacks on both domestic and international fronts.

    As the confederation ultimately faced defeat, the disruptions it caused became the pretext for the initial partitioning of the nation. This partitioning was executed through a treaty signed on August 5, 1772, with the signatures of Maria Theresa of Austria (1717–1781), Frederick II of Prussia (1712–1786), and Catherine II.

    Concurrently, the Bar Confederation sought support from France, enlisting the help of prominent thinkers such as Paul Pierre Lemercier de la Rivière (1719–1801), Gabriel Bonnot de Mably (1709–1785), and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778). These intellectuals labored in vain on proposals for systemic reform within the country’s institutions.

    From Partition to Annihilation

    On May 3, 1791, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth's Sejm enacted the May 3rd Constitution. This historical document marked Europe's first written national constitution and the second such constitution globally, coming after the United States Constitution.
    On May 3, 1791, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth’s Sejm enacted the May 3rd Constitution. This historical document marked Europe’s first written national constitution and the second such constitution globally, coming after the United States Constitution. (W. Commons)

    In the 1772 partition, the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth lost a third of its territory and population. The current Polish government, which was still under the leadership of Stanisław II, remained committed to reforming its institutions. The ‘Great Sejm’ (or Four-Year Sejm) of 1788–1792 worked on drafting a written Constitution.

    Enacted on May 3, 1791, the Government Act heralded a significant transformation by replacing the elective monarchy with a hereditary one.

    This evolution designated the House of Saxony as the inheritors of the crown, succeeding Stanisław II upon his demise. To facilitate the comprehensive execution of authority and the preservation of the “guardianship of laws,” the king received support from the primate, five ministers, and two secretaries of state.

    The legislative power belonged to the permanent bicameral Diet, or Sejm (Chamber of Envoys and Senate). Confederations and the liberum veto were abolished. Local prerogatives and those of the bourgeoisie were expanded.

    Catherine II vehemently opposed these progressive reforms that pose a challenge to Russia’s sway. This opposition culminated in the eruption of a fresh Russo-Polish conflict. Conservative magnates, bolstered by Russian support, established the Targowica Confederation. Intensifying military pressure compelled the king to align with this confederation, subsequently leading to a reversion to the previous political paradigm.

    Warsaw near the end of the Commonwealth's existence. Paintings by Bernardo Bellotto, 1770s. View of Cracow Suburb leading to the Castle Square.
    Warsaw, near the end of the Commonwealth’s existence. Paintings by Bernardo Bellotto, 1770s. View of the Cracow Suburb leading to Castle Square. Image: Wikimedia.

    During this period, Prussia, under the leadership of Frederick William II (1744–1797), maintained a neutral stance but actively participated in a subsequent division of Polish territory in January 1793, this time in conjunction with Russia.

    Notably, Austria refrained from partaking due to its engagement in hostilities against revolutionary France. As a consequence, Poland’s territorial expanse dwindled to a mere area of approximately 80,000 square miles (200,000 km2), housing a populace of 3 million inhabitants.

    In response, General Tadeusz Kościuszko (1746–1817), a distinguished figure from the American Revolutionary War, orchestrated and led an uprising aimed at emancipating Poland. Under his command, the regular army was marshaled alongside the enlistment of numerous volunteers drawn from the peasantry.

    These efforts yielded initial triumphs, yet the course of events took a turn when Kościuszko sustained injuries and was apprehended on October 10, 1794.

    Russia orchestrated a harsh suppression of the insurrection. This harsh response paved the way for a third and final partition of Poland, which Russia once again orchestrated in collaboration with Austria and Prussia.

    On October 24, 1795, this partition solidified, resulting in Poland’s subjugation to the ambitions of its formidable neighbors. As a consequence, the nation’s presence was entirely erased from the European map, a condition that persisted until the moment of its revival, alongside Lithuania, following the conclusion of World War I in 1918.

    Partition of the Kingdom of Poland at a Glance

    What was the Partitions of Poland?

    The Partitions of Poland refers to the division and annexation of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth by neighboring powers in the late 18th century. It resulted in the disappearance of the independent state of Poland from the map of Europe.

    When did the partitions of Poland occur?

    The partitions of Poland occurred in three main phases: the First Partition in 1772, the Second Partition in 1793, and the Third Partition in 1795.

    Which countries were involved in the partitions of Poland?

    The major powers involved in the partitions of Poland were the Russian Empire, the Habsburg Monarchy (Austria), and the Kingdom of Prussia.

    What were the reasons behind the partitions of Poland?

    The partitions of Poland were motivated by various factors, including territorial expansion, power politics, and the weakening of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The neighboring powers sought to gain territory and influence at the expense of Poland.

    What were the consequences of the partitions for Poland?

    The partitions led to the loss of sovereignty and territory for Poland. The country was divided among the three partitioning powers, erasing its political existence from the map until its eventual restoration in the 20th century.

    How was Poland divided in the partitions?

    In the First Partition (1772), Poland lost significant territories to Russia, Prussia, and Austria. The Second Partition (1793) further reduced Polish territory, and the Third Partition (1795) resulted in the complete dissolution of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.