Tag: ottoman empire

  • Suleiman the Magnificent: The Most Flamboyant of the Ottoman Sultans

    Suleiman the Magnificent: The Most Flamboyant of the Ottoman Sultans

    Ogier Ghislain de Busbecq, ambassador of Charles V (1500-1558), the Holy Roman Emperor, was astonished. During a diplomatic visit to Constantinople (Istanbul) in 1555, he beheld a sovereign adorned in “exquisite fabrics”, seated on a golden throne. Beside him stood horses draped in fine oriental jewels, and dignitaries clad in gold-threaded brocade, velvet, and white, red, and blue satin, richly embroidered and interwoven with gold and silver.

    Suleiman I (1494-1566), the tenth sultan of the Ottoman dynasty, fully deserved the title of “Magnificent”, which the West had attached to his name since his accession in 1520. His 46-year reign is considered the golden age of a reformed Ottoman Empire, reaching its maximum territorial expansion.

    Yet, nothing initially destined this Topkapi Palace school graduate for such a glorious fate. During the final years of his father Selim I’s life, Suleiman governed the province of Manisa in Turkey. However, Grand Vizier Piri Pasha regarded him as a weak and unpromising figure.

    Nevertheless, in 1515, the young prince demonstrated remarkable political and commercial acumen by successfully lifting the embargo on Iranian silk, which had been imposed after his father’s conflict with the Persian Shah Ismail I the previous year.

    What were Suleiman’s major military campaigns?

    • Conquest of Belgrade (1521)
    • Battle of Mohács (1526): Defeated Hungary, leading to Ottoman dominance in Central Europe.
    • Siege of Vienna (1529): Although unsuccessful, it demonstrated Ottoman power.
    • Conquest of Rhodes (1522): Defeated the Knights Hospitaller.

    Suleiman I, Nicknamed “The Lawgiver”

    Portrait of Suleiman by Titian (c. 1530)
    Portrait of Suleiman by Titian (c. 1530)

    Ascending to power at the age of 25, following his father’s death, the young sultan immediately demonstrated a strong commitment to justice. His first act of clemency was the liberation of several hundred Mamluks, whom Selim I had deported during his conquest of Syria and Egypt (1516-1517). For Suleiman, mistreating these Sunnis was out of the question, as he was now their caliph, the spiritual sovereign and successor of Muhammad.

    Suleiman proclaimed to the crowd that he was a pious ruler determined to strengthen Sunnism—a major branch of Islam—and to govern the empire’s Muslim population with order. Venetian envoy Bartolomeo Contarini wrote: “He claims to be a wise lord who loves learning, and everyone has high hopes for his reign.”

    While Europe referred to him as “The Magnificent” due to his extravagant lifestyle, the Ottomans in Constantinople called him “Kanuni” (The Lawgiver), in recognition of his extensive legal reforms.

    Between 1534 and 1545, Suleiman revised the Ottoman penal code, originally initiated by his great-grandfather Sultan Mehmed II and expanded in 1501. Under the supervision of his imperial scribe, Djelalzade, this Kanun (legal code) helped organize the state, the military, tax administration, and standardized fines for various offenses, including fornication, insults, alcoholism, theft, and looting.

    Unlike his predecessors’ harsher laws, Suleiman’s fermans (decrees) favored monetary penalties over capital punishment, although certain brutal punishments remained—brothel keepers were branded with hot irons, and thieves risked losing a hand.

    His desire to regulate the empire extended to every aspect of life, even seemingly trivial matters. Historian André Clot notes in his book Suleiman the Magnificent (Fayard, 1983): “Bakers, for instance, were required to use a specified amount of butter in their cakes.”

    Suleiman also achieved an unprecedented legal feat: harmonizing his Kanun with Sharia, the Islamic law governing all aspects of Muslim life.

    Suleiman’s Era

    France's King Francis I never met Suleiman, but they created a Franco-Ottoman alliance from the 1530s.
    France’s King Francis I never met Suleiman, but they created a Franco-Ottoman alliance from the 1530s.

    Supported by his Grand Mufti, Ebussuud Efendi, a renowned Islamic theologian, Suleiman issued legal texts that aligned with Quranic law. Precious metals like gold and silver, once considered contrary to the spirit of Islam, were now declared legal.


    Similarly, the first public coffeehouses, introduced by Syrian merchants in 1554, were officially permitted in Constantinople—a practice that flourished, with 600 establishments operating by the reign of his son, Selim II.

    The sultan also ensured mutual respect between Muslims and dhimmis (non-Muslims) while protecting his subjects from abuses by officials and the military. His viziers regularly reported on governance, helping him curb corruption. Suleiman embraced a pacifist role, advocating for a tolerant Islam that safeguarded the Christian and Jewish minorities within his empire. The city of Salonica alone housed around 17,000 Jews at the time.

    Architectural and Cultural Flourishing

    Suleiman’s faith was visibly expressed through monumental mosque construction—even in the most remote provinces. In 1539, he appointed Sinan (1489-1588), a Christian of Armenian origin, as Chief Imperial Architect—an honorary yet demanding position.


    Sinan quickly developed a distinctive architectural style, characterized by domed structures, tiered towers with rounded forms, and large windows.

    In 1550, Suleiman commissioned Sinan to build a grand religious complex, ensuring it would be visible and admired from all vantage points in Constantinople. The result was the Süleymaniye Mosque, completed seven years later—a masterpiece of Ottoman architecture.

    Artistic Patronage and Literary Influence

    Suleiman’s passion for refinement extended to various artistic fields. A lover of illuminated manuscripts, he surrounded himself with goldsmiths and ceramicists, granting them residency in Topkapi Palace to enjoy his patronage—and to partake in the lavish banquets held for foreign emissaries. He even appointed a Persian master as the official court painter.

    A true patron of the arts, Suleiman supported poets and writers, commissioning the Books of Selim to honor his father. Under a pseudonym, he wrote poetry himself and devoted entire days to reading works on history, geography, and astronomy.

    His influence also extended to language and diplomacy. Determined to elevate Turkish as the empire’s official language, he decreed in 1533 that all diplomatic correspondence with foreign rulers should be written in Turkish rather than Latin. His letters, often assertive or confrontational, bore his personal monogram (tughra), featuring the letter S for Suleiman, accompanied by the phrase: “Always victorious.”

    The Ottoman Empire at the Gates of Europe

    The Grand Turk—a pejorative name given by European courts—both terrified the West and captivated his own people. Upon ascending the throne, Suleiman inherited an empire stretching from the southern Danube to Syria, including Egypt, while Christian Europe was under the rule of Charles V. The Habsburg heir sought to unite all European states under the Holy Roman Empire to launch a crusade against Suleiman. Conflict was inevitable.

    In 1521, just one year after taking power, Suleiman launched his first military campaign. Leading his formidable army, he marched on Belgrade and captured the city in three weeks.

    buy nolvadex online http://rxdc.com/images/html/nolvadex.html no prescription pharmacy

    The Turks were now at the gates of Europe.
    buy xifaxan online http://rxdc.com/images/html/xifaxan.html no prescription pharmacy

    Meanwhile, Charles V, engaged on multiple fronts against Francis I of France and Henry VIII of England, lacked the military strength to counter this eastern threat. Seizing the opportunity, Suleiman pressed forward.

    In 1526, commanding an army of 100,000 men, he marched on Buda (Hungary). The Hungarian forces, led by King Louis II, were utterly crushed. “Suleiman’s victory was absolute. Two thousand heads, including those of seven Hungarian bishops, were stacked in a pyramid before the Sultan’s tent,” wrote historian André Clot. Nothing seemed capable of stopping the “Sovereign of Sovereigns.”

    The Siege of Vienna and Ottoman Setbacks

    Suleiman’s next target was Vienna, where he was determined to once again challenge the Holy Roman Emperor, whom he mockingly referred to as the “King of Spain.” However, his first two major campaigns had severely drained the imperial treasury. To finance his war efforts, he imposed a head tax on his subjects and expanded the Janissary corps from 12,000 to 20,000 soldiers.

    Meanwhile, Charles V entrusted the defense of Eastern Europe to his brother, Archduke Ferdinand I. The Ottoman campaigns against Vienna in 1529 and 1532 ended in failure—not due to military defeat, but because of the harsh winter conditions. Facing flooded rivers and impassable terrain, 120,000 soldiers, 28,000 camels, and 300 artillery pieces were forced to retreat.

    “It was impossible to sustain year-long campaigns in the harsh climates of Eastern and Central Europe. For centuries, Europe would be saved from the Turks by its climate and the vast distance separating it from Constantinople,” explained André Clot.

    buy cleocin online http://rxdc.com/images/html/cleocin.html no prescription pharmacy

    The Danube Front Becomes a Stalemate—The Conflict Shifts to the Mediterranean

    With no decisive breakthrough on the Danube front, the struggle shifts to the Mediterranean, a key battleground for control of trade routes between Europe, Africa, and Asia. In this naval power struggle, Suleiman—known to the West as the “Grand Dominator”—finds an unexpected ally: Francis I of France.

    This shocking alliance, described as a “sacrilegious union between the Fleur-de-Lis and the Crescent”, scandalizes Christian Europe. However, the “Most Christian King” of France and the Ottoman Caliph share a common enemy: the Habsburg Empire. Historian Yves Ternon explains in his book Empire ottoman that this agreement was a strategic inevitability:

    “Each side saw mutual benefit: the King of France sought an ally to break his country’s isolation, while the Sultan aimed to use this support to conquer Europe.”

    In April 1543, the Turkish fleet set sail for Italy, raiding the coasts of Calabria, Corsica, and Naples before being welcomed with great ceremony in Marseille. The fleet then wintered in Toulon, a remarkable moment in European-Ottoman diplomacy.

    By the late 1540s, the Ottomans had finally secured dominance over the Mediterranean, marking a turning point in their maritime supremacy.

  • Battle of Lepanto: The Ottoman Navy Was Decisively Defeated

    Battle of Lepanto: The Ottoman Navy Was Decisively Defeated

    Relations between the West and the Ottoman Empire were poisoned by political, cultural, and religious conflicts around the end of the 16th century. Multiple confrontations between the two superpowers began as early as 1463, when Turkish expansionism in the Mediterranean triggered tensions. Sultan Selim II of the Ottoman Empire set out to conquer Venice’s dominion of Cyprus in 1570. The raid initiated the fourth conflict between Venice and the Ottoman Empire.

    Pope Pius V established the Holy League on May 25, 1571, in an effort to halt the advancing Turks. At the naval battle of Lepanto on October 7, 1571, the fate of Cyprus was decided.

    There, off the Greek coast to the west, Don Juan of Austria led a Christian navy into battle against Selim II’s armada. The Turkish fleet was utterly destroyed by the combined armies of Spain and Venice in a matter of hours. About 7,500 Christians were killed, while at least twice as many Turks perished. Because of the Holy League’s victory at Lepanto, Ottoman expansionism in the Mediterranean was finally halted.

    What Were the Causes of the Battle of Lepanto?

    The city of Lepanto, on the west coast of Greece, plays a pivotal role in the events leading up to the decisive Battle of Lepanto. Since Constantinople’s fall in 1453, Europe and the Ottoman Empire have been at loggerheads about who should control the Mediterranean. The Republic of Venice and its allies fought several brutal battles against the Ottoman Empire. Sultan Selim II, son of Suleiman the Magnificent, set his sights on Cyprus in 1570 because he aspired to be a conqueror. In a few months, he conquered the island that served as the hub of the Venetian maritime empire and an economic nexus between Europe and the Middle East. Pope Pius V called on the European countries to join him in a crusade to retake the city and put a stop to Ottoman expansionism. To set aside their differences, the Christian forces formed an alliance known as the Holy League.

    Who Fought in the Battle of Lepanto?

    The Christian Holy League fought against the Turkish fleet of Sultan Selim II in the Battle of Lepanto. The Ottoman Empire, which had been established in the late 13th century with the intention of expanding by conquest, remained one of the world’s leading powers as late as 1571. From the Black Sea to the Mediterranean, it contended with Western interests throughout its expansive frontiers. Nearly 250 galleys and 45 galleots, under the leadership of Admiral Ali Pasha, made up the Turkish fleet during the Battle of Lepanto. There were also about 700 artillery and 13,000 sailors in addition to the 34,000 soldiers. Ali Pasha, Mohammed Sirocco, and Occhiali were the Turkish generals in charge of the army.

    In May 1571, the Habsburgs of Spain, the republics of Genoa and Venice, the Papal States, the Duchy of Savoy, and the Hospitallers established an alliance known as the Holy League to fight the Turks. Prince Juan of Austria commanded a force of over 200 ships, 1,800 guns, and around 30,000 mainly Spanish and Venetian troops. The latter was a half-brother of King Philip II of Spain as the illegitimate son of Emperor Charles V. Miguel de Cervantes, the author of “Don Quixote,” also fought on the side of the Christians. The writer loses the use of his left hand in this conflict and becomes known as the “Penguin of Lepanto.” Juan of Austria (Spain), Sebastiano Venier (Venice), Marcantonio Colonna (Vatican City), etc. lead the Holy League.

    Who Won the Battle of Lepanto?

    The Christian fleet reached the Gulf of Lepanto on October 7, 1571, after having sent spies to find the Turkish navy. Due to the narrow gulf’s confinement and lack of escape routes, the Ottomans were at a disadvantage when this conflict began. The Christian guns scattered the Turkish fleet, which led to a storm on Ali Pasha’s ship.

    The admiral’s head was severed and mounted on the top of a mast. The already battered Ottoman sailors’ morale completely plummeted, and only a small number of galleys made it to safety. After just a few hours of fighting, the Holy League achieved a stunning victory over the formerly unbeatable Turkish navy. In addition to the 137 seized ships and 50 sunk, the Christian side lost 7,500 men and suffered 20,000 injuries, while the Turkish side lost the same number of men and had 20,000 injuries, and both sides lost a total of 50 ships.

    What Was the Results of the Battle of Lepanto?

    Despite a resounding impact in the West, the success of the Holy League at Lepanto did not change the course of the conflict. The Ottoman Empire quickly reconstituted its naval force and kept control of all its conquests in the Mediterranean. However, the loss of many experienced sailors was a severe blow to the Sultan. He had to leave the western Mediterranean to Spain and its Italian allies. The Holy League, despite the victory, did not manage to recover the lost territories. With the death of Pope Pius V on May 1, 1572, the European coalition began to break up.

    On March 7, 1573, a peace treaty was finally signed between the Ottoman Empire and the Republic of Venice. The latter, ruined by the war, ceded Cyprus to the Turks in exchange for the resumption of commercial exchanges. France, which had not taken part in the conflict, remained an ally of the Ottomans due to religious wars paralyzing it. If it made it possible to definitively stop the Turkish expansion in the Mediterranean, the principal consequence of the battle of Lepanto was especially symbolic. The victory of Christianity over Islam thus generated the awakening of a European conscience linked to a common faith.

    How Was the Battle of Lepanto Immortalized?

    Allegory of the Battle of Lepanto, Paola Veronese.
    Allegory of the Battle of Lepanto, Paola Veronese. Source: Gallerie dell’Accademia

    Many Western painters of the period depicted the battle of Lepanto in their works. Specifically, Veronese, Titian, and Tintoretto are the three best Venetian painters of the late Renaissance. In its top portion, Paola Veronese’s “Allegory of the Battle of Lepanto” has a presentation of Venice to Mary. At the same time, Tintoretto, whose real name was Jacopo Robusti, painted “The Battle of Lepanto.” Tiziano Vecellio, better known as Titian, one of the best portraitists of the period, also finished his “Allegory of the Battle of Lepanto” in 1575. King Philip II of Spain sacrificed his baby son Ferdinand for the sake of triumph and God. There is a widespread Christian belief that praying the Rosary before going to battle with the Turks helped secure a victory in the Battle of Lepanto.

    The next year, on October 7th, Pius V established “The Feast of Our Lady of Victory” to celebrate the event. When his successor, Pope Gregory XIII, took office in 1573, he moved the celebration of the Holy Rosary to the first Sunday of each month and changed its name to the Feast of the Holy Rosary.


    Bibliography:

    1. Bicheno, Hugh. Crescent and Cross: The Battle of Lepanto 1571, pbk., Phoenix, London, 2004, ISBN 1-84212-753-5
    2. Capponi, Niccolò (2006). Victory of the West:The Great Christian-Muslim Clash at the Battle of Lepanto. New York: Da Capo Press. ISBN 0-306-81544-3.
    3. anson, Victor Davis (2010). The Father of Us All: War and History, Ancient and Modern. New York: Bloomsbury Press. ISBN 978-1-60819-410-0.
    4. Guilmartin, John F. (2003). Galleons and Galleys: Gunpowder and the Changing Face of Warfare at Sea, 1300–1650. Cassell. pp. 149–50.
    5. Hopkins, T.C.F. (2006). Confrontation at Lepanto: Christendom vs. Islam. New York: Forge Books. ISBN 978-0-76530-539-8.