Author: Hrothsige Frithowulf

  • Did People Live to an Average Age of 35 in the Middle Ages?

    Did People Live to an Average Age of 35 in the Middle Ages?

    It’s a common saying or tale that’s told over and over again: “People died young in the Middle Ages!” Alternately: “You would be an old man in the Middle Ages at the age of 40!” The average life expectancy of a medieval man is often mentioned in both popular and academic works, as well as in schoolbooks and pedagogical materials on medieval life. Somewhere between 33 and 50 years for males and 25 and 40 years for women is often cited as the average lifespan for Middle Age people; however, this range may vary greatly, as seen by a cursory examination of the available data.

    It is unclear not only how these numbers were compiled but also whether they apply to the early, high, or late Middle Ages, to a certain location, or to a specific socioeconomic group.

    How Long Did People Live in the Middle Ages?

    Monks and nuns of the Middle Ages had far higher life expectancy statistics.
    Monks and nuns in the Middle Ages had much longer life expectancies. Medieval monks in a beer cellar, by Joseph Haier (1873). Source: Wikimedia.

    The “Middle Ages” are now to be interpreted as “the dark, backward, unhygienic, unenlightened period before modernity,” when people’s lives were short and difficult, full of sickness and filth, and dominated by a foreign church and ruler. But this cliche has been disproven many times. What can we say with certainty about the average lifespan in the Middle Ages?

    No, you did not suddenly begin getting gray hair at the age of 20. A person who made it to maturity could expect to live for a long time beyond the age of 35 during the Middle Ages.

    In the 15th century, the median age of the French infantry was 32, and 51 percent were 31 or older. As usual, we know very little about the lives of the poor and working classes in the Middle Ages. Their birth and death dates, as well as the number of children they produced, are unknown. Only by chance do things about people’s lives in the Middle Ages come out in directories of landlords, chronicles, and other written sources.

    But famous names are an exception to this norm. To give a rather arbitrary example, Charlemagne lived to be 66 or 67 years old, while his biographer Einhard lived to be about 70. The Flemish poet Jacob van Maerlant lived for approximately 60 years.

    It is estimated that the Holy Roman Empire bishop and scholar Albertus Magnus lived to be 80, the saint Hildegard von Bingen to be 81, the author Christine de Pizan to be at least 65, Eleanor of Aquitaine to have perhaps died at 82, and the Nuremberg master builder Endres Tucher to have died soon after his 84th birthday.

    On the other hand, it is also easy to name instances of renowned people’s children who died at a young age themselves, whether in puberty or youth. So, what do these numbers suggest? Did people really die young or only live to an average age of 35 in the Middle Ages?

    Life Expectancy From the 13th to the 18th Centuries

    A 21-year-old in the 15th century had a minimum life expectancy of 69 years. Henry VIII in the Battle of Spurs.
    A 21-year-old in the 15th century had a minimum life expectancy of 69 years. Henry VIII in the Battle of Spurs. (Image: Enhanced from a public image on Gutenberg.org)

    The Australian mathematical statistician Henry Oliver Lancaster looked into the lifespan of English aristocrats from 1200 to 1745. He determined the life expectancy of individuals who died of old age or sickness by omitting those who died through violence, accidents, or poison.

    A 21-year-old in the 15th century had a minimum life expectancy of 69 years. Citizens between the ages of 16 and 60 were eligible to serve in the militia, meaning that all adults up to that age were deemed physically and mentally capable of participating in military service.

    Henry Lancaster compares how long people have lived across different time periods:

    1200–1300: 43 years; 1300–1400: 24.5 years; 1400–1500: 48 years; 1500–1550: 50 years; 1550–1600: 47 years; 1600–1650: 43 years; 1650–1700: 41.5 years; 1700–1745: 43 years.

    Factors That Affected Lifespan in the Middle Ages

    During the Middle Ages, most deaths occurred in three age groups: Young children (0–5) from childhood diseases; young adults from war or childbirth; and the elderly (60+), who lived to an age that was considered old according to the Bible’s lifespan of 70 years. The medieval people who lived to the age of 25 were not old, but they were a group affected by the most unpredictable factors: war and childbirth deaths.

    In common with other pre-modern nations, medieval people had little medical expertise and a high mortality rate overall. In adolescence, life expectancy started to differ between the sexes, despite continuing to rise with age.

    When boys reached the ages of 15 and 16, life expectancy was estimated at 60 to 80 years. However, mothers (especially the girl-mothers) were at increased risk for difficulties during delivery. The future King Edward I was born to Henry III (1207–1272) and his 16-year-old bride Eleanor.

    Painting by Rita Greer, depicting the Great Plague of 1665 in London.
    Painting by Rita Greer, depicting the Great Plague of 1665 in London. (Image, FAL)

    Natural calamities and illnesses like the Black Death significantly reduced the life expectancy of the medieval people, yet certain individuals, like the Doge of Venice, Enrico Dandolo (1107–1205), lived to be 90 years old and commanded the Venetian navy.

    In the Middle Ages, a person’s lifespan depended on a variety of factors, including their environment, genetics, diet, health, and access to medical care, as well as their socioeconomic status (same as today).

    According to the Nuremberg City Library archives, a medieval citizen, a stonemason, lived in central Europe from the time he was 68 until his death in 1595.

    Monks and nuns of the Middle Ages, for example, had far higher life expectancy statistics than the general population since they did not rely on landlords for hard physical work. So, they were able to live much longer than other citizens.

    Reasons for the Short Lifespan Estimates in the Middle Ages

    The truth is that the average life expectancy in the Middle Ages actually says little about the actual age of death of a large portion of the population, the expected or achievable age, or the distribution of the average age.

    Because child mortality rates in medieval times were quite high, they dragged down the overall life expectancy average. 

    This calls for statistics, but due to a lack of data, accurate statistics cannot be generated. In principle, most medieval individuals could indeed pass away by age 40, given that this is the median lifespan (give or take a few years). In reality, however, there is a much wider variation. While many medieval children died as infants due to illness, malnutrition, accidents, and other causes, another not insignificant number lived to a ripe old age at this time.

    The high infant mortality rate, which was mostly attributable to illnesses or a lack of medical knowledge and treatment, an improper or insufficient diet, poor cleanliness, delivery problems, and sudden infant death syndrome, was a key factor in the fabrication of these short lifespan statistics for the Middle Ages.

    According to the estimations, up to 40 percent of children died before they reached puberty during the medieval period, and another 10 to 20 percent died within their first year.

    However, if one made it through their youth unscathed in the Middle Ages, their chances of living to be 50, 60, or even older were not terrible. But threats to human safety from things like violence, war, disease, starvation, and accidents persisted.

    Medieval women had to deal with the added stress of having many children, while males had to contend with the risks of strenuous manual work, both of which might drastically reduce their lifespans relative to modern times. Today, smoking, cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes are only a few examples of the many contemporary risk factors that either have little impact or none at all on our lifespan.

    When Was Someone Considered Old in the Middle Ages?

    People living all the way to retirement age or a greater old age were not uncommon in the Middle Ages. Depending on the time period and the historian, the phases of medieval life were defined in various ways. However, in general, a person was regarded as an adult (adultus) from the ages of 21 to 40, a “mature” (maturus) from the ages of 41 to 60, and an elderly man from 61 and beyond (senectus).

    Thus, the perception of old age and young age was pretty similar in the Middle Ages to what it is today.

    Many teenagers commonly took the lead in combat throughout the Middle Ages, and 25 was considered a mature adult, typically with a family and responsibilities. It was no surprise at the time that William the Conqueror invaded England in his late 30s.

    Since it does not take into account things like deaths from sickness, the average life expectancy might be deceptive. A longer life expectancy of 60 years includes more elderly individuals but also more children who live beyond the age of 5.

    Due to the lengthy apprenticeship and journeyman’s time required, few urban craftsmen would have been able to earn the master’s title and open their own workshop before the age of 30 or 40. Ages 40 and up were traditionally seen as the cutoff for serious consideration for public office because of the inherent “maturity” that comes with them.

    However, the exception proves the rule, as typically only those who were considered “worthy” were granted any office role.

    So, in the Middle Ages, people who were 40 were not considered “old,” even though a hardworking farmer, craftsman, or day laborer might have thought otherwise.

  • Augustus Caesar Net Worth: How Rich Was Augustus?

    Augustus Caesar Net Worth: How Rich Was Augustus?

    How rich was Augustus Caesar? Many ancient rulers had more money than today’s billionaires do together. Since Augustus Caesar ruled over several of the world’s most powerful empires, including Egypt, historians estimate that he amassed a fortune worth trillions of dollars in today’s money. Augustus Caesar (63 BC–14 AD) amassed legendary fortunes via cunning and ruthlessness. In 2023 dollars, Augustus Caesar’s net worth was around $5.8 trillion.

    In 2014, Stanford professor of history Ian Morris claimed that Augustus was the sole owner of Egypt and that he was also in charge of the Roman Empire which accounted for around 25% to 30% of the world’s economic output. According to Morris, at one time, Augustus was so wealthy that he owned 20% of the Roman Empire’s economic output. Augustus Caesar’s calculated net worth in 2014 was $4.6 trillion, which equates to $5.8 trillion or €5.3 trillion in 2023 dollars.

    How Augustus Became the Man With the Highest Net Worth

    The provinces of the Roman Empire, 15 years later in the reign of Augustus.
    The provinces of the Roman Empire, 15 years later in the reign of Augustus.

    Augustus was a wealthy man beyond description, the wealthiest in Roman history and one of the richest of all time. At the time of his elevation to the rank of “princeps,” or “first citizen,” Augustus dominated most of the known world, including Egypt and much of Europe. To put Augustus’ extreme net worth in context, consider that the Roman General Marcus Licinius Crassus, a contemporary of Augustus Caesar, amassed a famous fortune from the sale of slaves and profits from his family’s silver mines, which is only worth around $350 billion in today’s currency.

    Despite being born into a senatorial family with a rich uncle in Julius Caesar, Augustus was not affluent himself until Caesar died and gave him his great inheritance. Caesar had taken half of Europe and depleted the imperial coffers, making Augustus the wealthiest man in the empire.

    Later, Augustus became the first emperor of Rome after conquering Mark Antony and Cleopatra (the Battle of Actium) and adding Egypt’s vast riches to his own. His net worth increased tenfold as a direct result of the overpowering of Egypt alone. This sum, believed to be at least 1/3 of the Roman Empire’s GDP, enabled Augustus to pay for the whole Roman military and other grand projects, leaving a comfortable bequest for his descendants.

    Augustus Caesar Net Worth: A Roman coin depicting Augustus Caesar (27--18 BC).
    A Roman coin depicting Augustus Caesar (27–18 BC).

    This level of net worth that Augustus had makes him 30 to 45 times richer than Jeff Bezos ($125 billion) and Elon Musk ($180 billion) respectively. For comparison, according to the economist Angus Maddison the total GDP of the Roman Empire was $57 billion in 2023 dollars. It’s impossible to fathom the size of his fortune. The total wealth of the world’s 10 wealthiest people is only $1.2 trillion today.

    Because Augustus’s fortune significantly outstripped that of the current richest people. Almost 30 legions and the grain dole, ancient Rome’s welfare system, were all paid for personally by Augustus. Considering how much the United States spends each year on defense, infrastructure, and social programs, Augustus would make at least $2.5 trillion a year if he were alive today. Augustus Caesar was richer than many modern countries.

    Historical Clues Regarding Augustus’ Net Worth

    augustus caesar as a wealthy figure
    An Augustus bust at Munich’s Glyptothek crowned with the Civic Crown. (Credit: Dan Mihai Pitea, CC BY-SA 4.0)

    As Caesar’s adoptive son and heir, Augustus was to receive 75% of his father’s fortune, as Suetonius mentioned. Caesar had several estates and a lot of money from his conquests. We don’t exactly know his net worth when he died but he was probably the wealthiest Roman.

    But, considering that Caesar left 300 Sestertii to each freeborn Roman citizen, it is safe to assume that this fortune was quite a lot. The freeborn citizens in the city of Rome were around 250,000 at that time and it is estimated that one Sestertius was around $4.25 in today’s currency. Thus, Caesar left 75 million Sestertii or around $320 million to the citizens alone.

    Marc Anthony, who considered Augustus a danger, had to provide his consent for the fortune to be transferred. With the help of Caesar’s former soldiers, Augustus formed a private army and made a bargain with the Senate. As a result, he joined Anthony and Lepidus in the Second Triumvirate and shared in their patrimony. When the Roman triumvirate collapsed, Augustus took over as dictator and instituted a system to consolidate his authority.

    Augustus ran Egypt as if it were his own private domain, shifting funds between the public and private sectors as he saw fit. The public benefited from Augustus’ personal wealth. For instance, Augustus disbursed more over 600,000,000 Sestertii from his “private” assets for public enterprises, as documented in Res Gestae Divi Augusti.

    This equates to approximately $2.6 billion in 2023 dollars. The inverse flow of funds is mysterious. Moreover, the wealthy Roman citizens could use the option of leaving a portion of their land to the emperor Augustus as political cover which the general Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa or the rich political advisor Gaius Maecenas were famous for doing.

    Augustus Owed His Net Worth to Julius Caesar

    An artwork depicts Julius Caesar in front of Alexander's monument.
    An artwork depicts Julius Caesar in front of Alexander’s monument. (Federico Godoy Castro, 1894)

    Augustus owed his success in becoming one of the world’s wealthiest men to the assassination of Julius Caesar, his adopted father and great uncle. Soon after, Octavian, as he was still known at the time, rallied the troops to his side and brutally put down his enemies.

    But it wasn’t until the Senate bestowed upon him the honorary name Augustus, stripped the old aristocratic families of their authority, and ended the civil war that he gained widespread acclaim and support from the general public. There was finally peace in the Roman capital and the provinces.

    Octavius was born into a wealthy family, although they were not among Rome’s elite. By the time he was 40, he was the absolute ruler of the Roman Empire, thanks to his political savvy, the power he gained through his relationship with Julius Caesar, and a state loan of around $40 billion (in today’s currency). While he did share some authority with the Senate, he was mostly in charge of the Empire’s provinces (called “Imperial Provinces”).

    The Roman Empire accounted for one-third of the world’s GDP at the time, and Augustus owned a quarter of it, which is worth an estimated $5.8 trillion in today’s dollars, or the GDP of five of the fifty states in the United States.

    Augustus was often portrayed as Jupiter, the most revered god in the Roman pantheon. No present billionaire can claim to be as wealthy as Augustus Caesar unless they control five US states and have a god status.

    The most beautiful month of the year for many is named after Augustus, and even religious people who care less about politics are familiar with his name. In the biblical tale, Mary and Joseph had to go to Bethlehem because of a census ordered by Augustus Caesar (even though Augustus never ordered a census for the whole Roman Empire in the historical records).

    The Roman Economy Thrived While Augustus Was in Charge

    Under Augustus Caesar, business boomed, cities expanded, and creative people rejoiced. During this period, Rome was responsible for more than a quarter of global GDP, and Augustus, if traditional history is to be believed, was either shrewd or unscrupulous enough to appropriate a fifth for himself. In today’s terms, that equates to an incredible $5.8 trillion or €5.3 trillion.

    Famous for his conquests, Augustus Caesar is often mentioned in the same breath as Napoleon Bonaparte. Augustus may have made life peaceful for his subjects inside the empire, but it was definitely unbearable on the outside.

    The Roman Republic’s first emperor, Augustus raised the already unflinching conquering missions to new heights as he took an example from his adoptive father, Julius Caesar. He conquered all of Egypt and Cantabria and marched his soldiers even farther north, into Germania.

    Augustus Caesar was never in a hurry to celebrate his victories. He was 76 years old when he passed away, making him an absolute Methuselah for that time when the life expectancy at birth was 25 years. Even more impressively, Augustus successfully set up his stepson Tiberius as his successor, and he received a large portion of Augustus’ net worth.

  • How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln with His Hat?

    How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln with His Hat?

    The towering height of Abraham Lincoln is one of the most recognizable features associated with him. Despite the fact that he was 6 feet 4 inches tall without the top hat, his hat made him appear even more towering at almost 7 feet in height. The “stovepipe hat” he sported was a common fashion choice for men at the time since it was meant to be worn high on the head and give the wearer the illusion of greater stature.

    Despite the lack of known head-to-toe dimensions on how tall Abraham Lincoln was with his hat, we can deduce from archival sources that his top hats were between 7 and 8 inches in height which means Lincoln was 6 feet 11 inches tall with his hat. Lincoln’s towering black hat has become a recognizable symbol of him in paintings, photographs, and other historical representations.

    Abraham Lincoln’s Height With His Hat

    How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln With His Hat
    Image: uc.edu.

    We know for a fact that all of Abraham Lincoln’s stovepipe hats were between 7 and 8 inches in height. Thus, Abraham Lincoln’s height with his hat was between 6 feet 11 inches and 7 feet (211–213 cm) tall. Considering the likelihood that most of his hats were probably only 7 inches tall, the most likely measurement for Lincoln’s height with his hat is 6 feet 11 inches.

    For instance, the National Museum of American History reportedly has one of Lincoln’s hats, also measuring 7 inches in height. Washington hatmaker J. Y. Davis sold Lincoln this silk stovepipe. Lincoln’s hat was a black silk top hat with a broad brim, stiffened felt, beaver fur, and a fur crest. One of Lincoln’s top hats had an official head circumference of 7-1/8 inches, and that is the only thing known about it regarding its measurement.

    Did Lincoln Try to Look Taller With His Hat?

    At Almost 7 feet tall with his top hat, Abraham Lincoln was taller than everybody else around him.
    At Almost 7 feet tall with his top hat, Abraham Lincoln was taller than everybody else around him.

    During his early days in politics, Lincoln simply favored top hats without any specific motivation. But President Abraham Lincoln’s massive top hat was more than just a stylish accessory. Lincoln, who was 6 feet 4 inches tall, really seemed much more towering in his big hat. In an era when physical stature was still associated with status, Lincoln’s 7-inch-tall hat likely contributed to his public perception as a confident and strong leader. But there is also more to that:

    Abolitionists at Lincoln’s time often wore tall hats; therefore, Lincoln’s choice of this style may be seen as evidence of his commitment to the abolitionist cause. The fact that Lincoln wore a tall hat also indicated his humble beginnings in the expanding 19th-century middle class, when such headwear was popular among them. Lincoln’s almost 7-foot stature with his hat always made him stand out and appear taller than those around him.

    Assessing the Height of 19th-Century Top Hats

    Lincoln with his famous top hat stood around 6 feet 11 inches tall.
    Lincoln with his famous top hat stood around 6 feet 11 inches tall.

    During the Victorian Era (1837–1901), a top hat would typically sit at a height of 6.3 to 6.7 inches. Abraham Lincoln wore a hat that was at least 7 inches tall during this time period. In fact, by the turn of the 19th century, it had become usual to sport a hat that was 7 or 8 inches in height. So, Lincoln’s top hat was not particularly remarkable. Around 1890, the crown of the top hat was widened to give it a more refined, tailored look. The height of the top hat was reduced to 4.7–5.0 inches by the 1920s.

    In Lincoln’s day, precise height measurement was not as common as it is now. Abraham Lincoln’s autobiographies, rather than real measurements, are used in many of the earliest biographies and reports of Lincoln’s height. Wearing top hats was also widespread in the 19th century, and the increased height they provided would have varied according to the hat style. Abraham Lincoln’s hat was designed to always sit upright while worn, emphasizing his already slender physique.

    How Lincoln’s Tall Stature and His Hat Risked His Life

    abraham lincoln with his tall hat next to a little girl

    The high stovepipe hats Lincoln favored made him a target for assassination. A sniper’s bullet pierced the top of his hat as he rode his horse to his summer retreat (“Soldiers’ Home”) a few miles from the White House in 1864. Many also think that Lincoln’s survival was due to his hat hiding his head.

    Once again, Lincoln’s life was in jeopardy due to his massive stovepipe: During the Battle of Fort Stevens in July 1864, Lincoln wore a hat that made him a perfect target for Confederate fire as he surveyed Union positions. Captain Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. shouted at Lincoln, “Get down, you stupid idiot!” as he rescued the president. And Lincoln did not wear his tall hat on the night he was murdered. To this day, there is no other president more intimately linked to a piece of clothing than Abraham Lincoln.

  • How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln?

    How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln?

    How tall was Abraham Lincoln? Lincoln’s height is one of the most distinctive physical characteristics of the 16th President of the United States. Many historians assume that, at 6 feet 4 inches (193 cm), he is the tallest U.S. president. As a result of his height, he was able to command respect and attention in debates and public speeches. Lincoln’s height and weight are clearly defied in his biographies and other historical texts. Thus, there is no controversy or disagreement about how tall Lincoln was, and his stature still lives on as a symbol of power and dominance.

    Young Abe Lincoln with his enormous hands.
    Abe Lincoln with his enormous hands.

    Abraham Lincoln, at 6’4″ (193 cm), was not only the tallest US president but also had the largest hands among world leaders other than Maximinus Thrax, who was allegedly 8 feet, one finger (2.4 meters) tall. Lincoln’s enormous hands often made him self-conscious, so he would hide them in his coat or pockets to avoid intimidating others. Despite this, a few photographs have captured their size. According to the Lincoln Lore bulletin from 1936, the circumference of his hands is determined to be ten inches and his bare feet measured 12 inches (30.5 cm).

    Historical Records on Abraham Lincoln’s Height

    His autobiographies

    Abraham Lincoln full body portrait.

    Due to the diversity of sources, we do know for sure how tall Abraham Lincoln was. Since the United States was preoccupied with the Civil War, there was never an official height measurement of Lincoln taken during his lifetime. However, we know from his autobiographies and other references that Abraham Lincoln stood at a height of 6 feet 4 inches (193 cm).

    “If any personal description of me is thought desirable, it maybe said, I am in height, six feet, four inches, nearly; lean in flesh, weighing, on an average, one hundred and eighty pounds; dark complexion, with coarse black hair, and gray eyes. No other marks or brands recollected.”

    Abraham Lincoln, in his autobiography.
    Abraham Lincoln with his 7-inch-tall stovepipe hat.
    Abraham Lincoln with his 7-inch-tall stovepipe hat.

    Unlike many other public speakers of the time, Lincoln didn’t use raised platforms when he spoke to large crowds. Instead, he used his height to his advantage. Diet has a significant role in determining a person’s final stature, and even a century or two ago, the average American had access to superior nutrition than the average European.

    The fire in the White House

    white house stable 1864
    A fire broke out at the White House stable (right) on February 10, 1864.

    In February 1864, during a fire in the White House, President Lincoln attempted to enter a burning White House stable to rescue six trapped horses, including two belonging to his sons Willie and Tad. Despite being restrained by those nearby, Lincoln personally broke open the stable door but was stopped by the guards. The loss of Willie’s pony was an especially great source of pain for him.

    According to the Lehrman Institute, the president was spotted at the fire by William P. Bogardus, who was part of the guard team selected to serve as Lincoln’s mounted escort, and Bogardus remarked: “As we stood watching the burning building someone put a hand on the tight board fence that surrounded the barn and vaulted over. The fence was over six feet high.

    Was Abraham Lincoln Unusually Tall for His Time?

    With his towering stature, Abraham Lincoln stands alongside his officers.
    With his towering stature, Abraham Lincoln stands alongside his officers.

    Abraham Lincoln stood at a height that was uncommon for his day. He often used the fact that he was the tallest person in the room as a conversation opener. According to the standard percentile scale, his height placed him in the 99th or 98th percentile. Lincoln is shown above alongside around 15 other men, all of whom are noticeably shorter than he is (only one of whom reaches his jaw).

    In 1950, American men typically stood at a height of 5 feet, 5 inches (165 cm). Lincoln towered above this by 11 inches. The average height of a contemporary American male is roughly 5 feet 9 inches (175 cm).

    "Lincoln Was the Tallest President", 1929.
    “Lincoln Was the Tallest President”, 1929.

    In 1850, the average height of an American soldier was 5’7″ (170 cm). From the Revolutionary War to World War II, Americans were taller than Europeans on average. This height advantage was likely due to the abundance of resources, including diverse nutrition and a better diet, in America’s largely privately-owned agricultural society.

    Coming from a family with tall people, such as his 6 feet (183 cm) tall father, Abraham Lincoln was indeed too tall for his time. He was 9 inches (23 cm) taller than the average American soldier during the Civil War and an inch shorter than the current average height for males in the country. His height was also especially unusual due to the fact that the standard deviation of height at the time was 3 inches instead of 4 inches (7.6 cm instead of 10 cm) today.

    When Did Lincoln Reach a Height of 6 Feet 4 Inches?

    Abraham Lincoln sitting

    According to the myth, Abraham Lincoln was already 5’5 (165 cm) tall when he was only 9 years old. According to “The Life of Abraham Lincoln; From His Birth to His Inauguration as President” by Ward H. Lamon, at the age of 15, Abraham Lincoln rapidly grew, and by the time he was 17 years old, he had already attained his full height of 6 feet 4 inches (193 cm).

    As a teenager, Lincoln was known for his long, wiry build and disproportionate extremities. He had a small torso and a small head in comparison to his long and powerful limbs.

    At a towering height of 6 feet 4 inches (193 cm), Abraham Lincoln stood out even among the giants of the pioneering family he belonged to. Thomas Lincoln, Abraham’s father, was also a big, burly man himself, standing at six feet tall and weighing in at about two hundred pounds; he was sluggish in both speech and movement.

    Did Lincoln Have Marfan’s Syndrome?

    Historians speculate that Lincoln may have had Marfan’s syndrome, a condition that causes increased height and hand size, along with possible low muscle tone. However, this is uncertain. His height, long, lanky limbs, long, narrow face, etc. are all characteristics of Marfan Syndrome, which has been proposed as a possible cause of his physical features. A rare genetic ailment that wasn’t understood until long after his passing, the discovery of Marfan syndrome only happened in 1896.

    Connective tissue, which serves as the “glue” between cells, is disrupted in Marfan syndrome, a hereditary condition. Some of the most often reported symptoms are unusually long fingers and toes, a long, narrow face, heart murmurs, an enlarged aorta; other cardiovascular concerns, impaired eyesight, and abdominal and limb discomfort. As reported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), people with Marfan syndrome tend to be tall, slender, and loose-jointed.

    The Personal Appearance of Lincoln

    abraham lincoln

    According to “The Life of Abraham Lincoln” from 1872, Lincoln’s skin was dark, shriveled, and yellow in color. He dressed in simple clothing, including low shoes, buckskin pants, a rough shirt, and an opossum or raccoon skin top hat. Lincoln was described in great detail by a gentleman who knew him well in Springfield. Standing 6’4″ (193 cm) he had a gaunt and wiry frame with a short torse, long arms relative to his height, and legs in proportion to his body. Lincoln was slow in movement with a deliberate, firm gait, often with his head tilted forward and hands clasped behind his back.

    In attire, Lincoln was clean but not fashionable, except for his famous tall hat, and in manners, he was cordial and simple. He greeted friends warmly with a handshake and a smile. Narrow in the shoulders, Lincoln’s features were not conventionally handsome at rest, but his dark gray eyes often showed great emotion. Lincoln had black, wiry hair and a relatively small head. He had a slightly Roman nose, a wide mouth, and a weather-beaten complexion.

    As a US president, Lincoln was never strict in his ideas and was open to hearing out people like Frederick Douglas, a prominent abolitionist and black philosopher.

    Abraham Lincoln’s Height with His Hat

    Abraham Lincoln

    His head measured eight inches from front to back and six and a half inches from ear to ear. His hat measured seven and one-eighth inches.

    Abraham Lincoln had numerous top hats in his lifetime, and the height of all of his top hats varied between seven and eight inches. When Abraham Lincoln wore his famous 7-inch-tall stovepipe hat, he seemed much taller than his natural height of 6 feet, 4 inches (193 cm). The addition of the hat made Abe almost 7 feet tall, bringing his total height to 6 feet 11 inches (211 cm).

    At 6’4″, How Strong Was Abraham Lincoln?

    Despite his towering stature and thin frame, narrow shoulders and waist, Abraham Lincoln had extraordinary power in his arms and hands. When he was younger, he made a name for himself as a skilled worker and wrestler. Wrestling was one of the few sports in which Lincoln excelled. The advantages he had from his stature and the size of his hands were substantial. Before he entered politics, he had a successful career as a wrestler, where he lost just once in more than 300 fights. When it came to splitting rails, he was a formidable figure.

    During the Civil War, when he was over 52 years old and not too healthy, he would still shake hundreds of hands in a day, carry a large axe with one hand while keeping his arm stretched for many minutes, and ferociously chop wood to keep his injured men warm, all while never exceeding a weight of 190 pounds. Lincoln had the biggest size 14 boots of any president, and his physicians remarked on his extraordinary muscular structure after his death. Abraham Lincoln was a powerful orator and a towering personality in the 19th century.

    He once engaged in a duel with a man named James Shields in 1842, and during the course of the fight, he swung his broadsword through the air and struck a neighboring tree limb, slicing it clean off.

    How Tall is Abraham Lincoln’s Statue?

    The Lincoln Statue at the Lincoln Memorial is 19 feet (5.8 m) tall, despite its initial design of about 10 feet (3 m). The end product is a statue of Abraham Lincoln that would stand 28 feet (8.5 m) tall. The statue also measures 19 feet in width, which is what makes it appear more impressive.

    The Tallest US Presidential Candidate Ever

    Lincoln stands half an inch higher than the second-tallest US president, Lyndon B. Johnson, who is 6 feet, 3.5 inches (1.92 meters). On the other hand, Winfield Scott (6 ft 5 in, or 1.96 m), was an inch taller than Lincoln, and he is still the tallest US presidential candidate in history. George Washington was 6 feet 0 (1.83 m) and the shortest US president was James Madison at 5 feet 4.2 inches (1.63 m).


  • How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln’s Hat?

    How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln’s Hat?

    How tall was Abraham Lincoln’s hat? The 16th President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, is remembered for many things, including his towering top hat, his role in maintaining the Union, and the Emancipation Proclamation. Lincoln was often photographed wearing this distinctive stovepipe hat, which has come to symbolize him and his legacy. However, how tall was Lincoln’s hat, exactly? There has been a lot of discussion and guesswork about this, with most historians estimating the hat’s height as 7 or 8 inches (18 or 20.3 cm). Let’s take a look at Lincoln’s hat in all its physical glory, compare the many sizes that have been given, and settle the debate once and for all.

    The Height of Lincoln’s Hat

    How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln’s Hat

    Until his death in 1865, Lincoln wore a big top hat that became instantly recognizable by everyone else. The tall top hats were invented at the end of the 1700s, and in the middle of the 1800s, they became so tall that they were called “stovepipe hats. Top hats of the past were originally fashioned from felted fur. Next, a fur-like silk fabric was utilized, and this was bonded to a cardboard hat form. On April 14th, 1865, he wore it for the final time on the way to Ford’s Theatre.

    While no one knows for certain, Lincoln’s hat is said to have been around 7 inches in height. This can be confirmed using historical records and photographs taken at the time. One of Lincoln’s hats, likewise 7 inches in height, is said to be on display in the National Museum of American History. Lincoln purchased this silk stovepipe from J. Y. Davis, a hat maker in Washington.

    This is one of Abraham Lincoln's many top hats, all measuring 7 to 8 inches tall.
    This is one of Abraham Lincoln’s many top hats, all measuring 7 to 8 inches tall. Smithsonian Institution.

    The only recorded measurement of Lincoln’s original top hat was a head circumference of 7-1/8 or 57 centimeters. Lincoln wore a black silk top hat with stiffened felt, beaver fur, and a wide brim. When worn, the hat always leaned vertically, giving Abraham Lincoln an even more elongated profile.

    The standard top hat height during the Victorian period (1837–1901) was 6.3–6.7 inches. This era corresponds with Lincoln’s 7-inch-tall hat. In fact, wearing seven or even eight-inch-tall hats was the norm at the beginning of the 19th century. So, Lincoln’s tall hat was not that extraordinary. The top hat’s crown was expanded in about 1890 to provide a more elegant and fitted appearance. By the 1920s, the top hat’s height had been lowered to 4.7–5.0 inches.

    Why Did Lincoln Wear a Tall Top Hat?

    The towering top hat Abraham Lincoln wore was more than simply a fashion statement. Ironically, the height of the hat made Lincoln, who stood at 6 feet 4 inches, seem even taller. Lincoln’s 7-inch-tall hat helped portray an image of confidence and strength in a period when height was still considered a symbol of power and authority.

    abraham lincoln with hat

    Abraham Lincoln’s tall top hat served more than just aesthetic or functional objectives. Lincoln’s preference for the tall hat, which was often worn by abolitionists, could be seen as a sign of his dedication to the abolitionist cause. Lincoln’s tall hat was also a mark of his place in the growing 19th-century middle class, since wearing tall hats was a common accessory at the time.

    How Tall Was Abraham Lincoln With His Hat?

    Abraham Lincoln was already tall at 6 feet 4 inches without his hat, and he appeared even taller with the height of his 7-inch-tall stovepipe hat. With the hat, his overall height was 6 feet 11 inches, which means he was almost 7 feet tall!

    When Did Lincoln Begin to Wear Top Hats?

    The origins of Lincoln’s affinity for top hats remain a mystery. It is believed that during his early days in politics, he simply favored the style without any specific motivation. The trend persisted well after his passing. Lincoln had a preference for top hats that appeared well-worn rather than pristine. However, the height of his hat always made him stand out and appear taller than those around him.

    The Risk of Wearing a Tall Hat

    Lincoln’s tall stovepipe hats made him easily recognizable and a target for assassins. In 1864, while on horseback to a summer cottage (“Soldiers’ Home”) a few miles from the White House, a sniper shot at him and hit his hat, piercing through the crown. People believed that the hat saved Lincoln’s life.

    Because of his towering stovepipe, Lincoln was once again in danger of being murdered: In July 1864, when surveying Union lines, Lincoln was a prime target for Confederate fire during the Battle of Fort Stevens because of the hat he was wearing. “Get down, you damn fool!” captain Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., yelled as he pulled Lincoln to safety.

    Since the death of his son, Willie, Lincoln had also added a black mourning band to his hats. Though the hat was said to have saved his life, it was again with him during his tragic end, as he wore it the night of his assassination. Abraham Lincoln remains the only president closely associated with a specific item of clothing.

    In conclusion, most historians agree that Abraham Lincoln’s top hat was around 7 inches in height. The hat’s functional aim was to make Lincoln seem taller, but it also had a deeper symbolic meaning. Lincoln’s tall hat remained one of his most recognizable and memorable features.

  • What Authors and Books Did Hitler Read?

    What Authors and Books Did Hitler Read?

    • Hitler had an extensive personal library with over 16,000 books.
    • Hitler’s reading interests were diverse, including military books and philosophical works.
    • Hitler was influenced by esoteric and obscure writings, not just mainstream literature.

    Adolf Hitler had a voracious reading habit. While still a young man, he would often read every book in the library. In Vienna, he spent much of his time reading. He read thousands of books, and he memorized large portions of his favorites. Odd enough, Hitler probably read more books than anybody else in history. Adolf Hitler even neglected Eva Braun because of his reading obsession. More than 16,000 books lined the shelves of the dictator’s personal library. In 2003, Timothy W. Ryback, a historian, analyzed the books Hitler read. Hitler read the writings of Karl May, Wilhelm Busch, Karl Marx, and many more.

    Adolf Hitler was a bookworm. Even as a World War I soldier, he chose to spend what little money he had on books rather than on hookers and cigarettes. While stationed in the trenches, Hitler read the tract of an architectural critic who railed against the “over-alienation” of Berlin by non-Prussian structures.

    Hitler, the mass murderer, was either unaware or unconcerned that this German nationalist architecture critic was Jewish. His reading binge had a meticulous quality to it; he read the books diligently, sometimes till the small hours of the morning. Even after Hitler became dictator of the German Reich, he continued to be a bookworm.

    adolf hitler reading
    Hitler’s holidays in early August 1933. (Attribution: Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-2004-1202-502 / CC-BY-SA 3.0)

    Hitler wasn’t concerned about illiteracy, which plays a major part in Bernhard Schlink‘s international blockbuster “The Reader.” Once, as Hitler was enjoying a cup of tea and some books in the “Berghof” in the Berchtesgadener Land, he was suddenly interrupted by Eva Braun. After he sent her out with a scathing monologue, Eva stumbled down the steps outside his room as her face flushed with anger.

    After spending the night buried in a book, Hitler would come out the next morning and give a comprehensive explanation of what he had read. As a reader, Hitler favored books with reference sources and encyclopedias. As the story goes, there was a time when a debate arose about just how magnificent Napoleon Bonaparte really was as a leader. Hitler mysteriously walked into the next room, retrieved the “Großer Brockhaus,” and then returned with the right answer he was looking for.

    Some of the books that Hitler is believed to have read:

    1. “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion”
    2. “The Will to Power” by Friedrich Nietzsche
    3. “The Decline of the West” by Oswald Spengler
    4. “The World as Will and Representation” by Arthur Schopenhauer
    5. “Thus Spoke Zarathustra” by Friedrich Nietzsche
    6. “The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century” by Houston Stewart Chamberlain.

    How Many Books Did Hitler Have?

    However, Hitler was not only an avid reader but also a collector. In 1935, Janet Flanner of the “New Yorker” reported that Hitler had 6,000 books in his personal collection. A decade later, there were 16,300 books in his library collection. In the end, only around 1,200 volumes were recovered from Hitler’s private collection that was dispersed among homes in Munich, Berlin, and Berchtesgaden. Hitler’s books are stored today at the Library of Congress in Washington, DC, on standard steel shelving.

    Timothy W. Ryback, a historian, paid Hitler’s library a visit. He has cleaned off the book spines, combed through the pages for notes and drawings, and later written a literary biography of Hitler: “Hitler’s Private Library: The Books That Shaped His Life.

    We know from Dante that anybody attempting to go into the Inferno must be accompanied by a guide, a Cicerone. Timothy Ryback’s guide down into the monster’s head was a German-Jewish scholar named Walter Benjamin. He killed himself at Portbou, France, in 1940, with the Gestapo on his heels and an impassable border in front of him.

    Even Hitler’s love of books couldn’t compete with that of German philosopher Walter Benjamin. He believed that someone’s personal library was like a window into her or his whole being, and a person’s personality could be “read” by the collection of books he or she amasses over the course of a lifetime.

    But just as Hegel claims that the owl of Minerva doesn’t take to the air until nightfall, one can only accurately assess the spirit of a given era once it has passed into obsolescence, so too can the soul of a bookworm be understood only after he has passed away. And this is the case with Hitler.

    In What Ways is Hitler Portrayed in the Books He Read?

    Hitler read anything that caught his eye, which made him an extremely diverse reader. Unsurprisingly, there are a lot of mundane details too, including the fact that half of Hitler’s book was devoted to military books. It has also long been known that Hitler adored Karl May‘s Native American works. As the tides of battle turned against him, Hitler sought solace in May’s Wild West fancies, perhaps hoping that at the last minute, battalions of Old Shatterhands would rescue his Nazi Germany with a cunning plan of attack against the red Comanches and Yankee bombers.

    Adolf Hitler read the books of the Jew-hater Paul de Lagarde with great perseverance. The film director Leni Riefenstahl suggested to Hitler the philosopher Johann Gottlieb Fichte’s volume of books, who taught Völkisch socialism (a German ethno-nationalist movement) and was a fanatical Jew-hater. While the German philosopher Nietzsche was also more often linked with the Nazis, he was a Jewish critic but not a Jew-hater.

    Hitler liked Johann Gottlieb Fichte's books, which were full of hatred for Jews and taught Völkisch socialism, a German ethno-nationalist movement.
    Hitler liked Johann Gottlieb Fichte’s books, which were full of hatred for Jews and taught Völkisch socialism, a German ethno-nationalist movement.

    The book “Thus Spoke Zarathustra,” written by Nietzsche, enthralled Hitler immensely. The ideals of self-mastery, self-cultivation, self-direction, and self-overcoming, as well as the idea of the “Übermensch” or “superman,” inspired him in particular. Hitler was particularly taken by the book’s repeating themes of accepting one’s destiny by embracing all of life’s tragedies and joys and perpetual recurrence—the belief that all events in one’s life would happen again and again, indefinitely. Also, the book “God is Dead,” the prediction of the Übermensch, and another of his books, “The Will to Power,” which is essential to human nature, all inspired Hitler’s thoughts.

    Among the books Hitler owned is a beautifully bound copy of the “Words of Christ,” but it is hard to interpret from this that Hitler was a devout Bible reader. He cherished the books, not only “Robinson Crusoe,” but also “Don Quixote” and “Gulliver’s Travels.” It’s true that Shakespeare was one of Hitler’s favorite authors, as he often quoted the poet. The 1925 edition of Shakespeare’s works, translated by Georg Müller, was found in his possession. Shakespeare was responsible for several turning points in his country’s history. On the other hand, the possible books of Goethe, Schiller, Dante, and Schopenhauer were probably destroyed during the Allied bombardment.

    Hitler often recited lines from “Julius Caesar” and “Hamlet,” such as “Thou shalt see me at Philippi” or “To be, or not to be, that is the question.”

    This all can be quite humiliating to find out. Because Adolf Hitler is not the kind of person you want to share a love of Shakespeare, Miguel de Cervantes, or even Jonathan Swift‘s Gulliver’s Travels with.

    But Thomas Mann’s famous article “Bruder Hitler” is one antidote that does calm our annoyance about the books Hitler read and liked. Timothy Rybeck probably did not know about this article, otherwise he would certainly have cited it. Before World War II broke out, author Thomas Mann saw something of a kindred artist in Hitler, whom he both despised and was captivated by.

    He writes, “It’s all there, in a shameful way: the difficulty, laziness, and miserable indefinability of childhood; the inability to be accommodated; the half-stupid vegetating in deepest social and mental bohemia; the fundamentally haughty; the fundamentally thinking oneself too good; the rejection of any reasonable and honorable activity.”

    Many Obscure and Occult Writings

    It is sad that this avid reader turned out to be a murderer. Many of the books in Hitler’s collection have esoteric or otherwise hard-to-find subjects. An obscure author called Ernst Schertel reflects Hitler’s mind better than Friedrich Nietzsche, Arthur Schopenhauer, or Gottlieb Fichte.

    Riedel, in his work titled “The Law of the World: The Coming Religion,” criticizes the materialism and goal-orientedness of the average European by pointing out that they base their beliefs on facts rather than on anything internal to themselves. According to the book, the real genius is “ectropic” in the sense that it can create an entire universe from nothing via the application of its devilish will.

    Hitler put several thick and passionate pencil notes of approval on the book. The “ectropic” was the term that defined his leadership.

    Hitler’s ideas were influenced by an after theory from a cheap, sensationalized booklet rather than Martin Luther or German idealism. For years, it has been known that the “Ostara” series booklets, written by Austrian “racial theorist” Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels, had a significant impact on young Adolf Hitler. This information was revealed in Wilfried Daim’s book “Der Mann, der Hitler die Ideen gab,” (The Man Who Gave Hitler The Ideas) which also highlights the pornographic elements of these booklets.

    At the end of reading Timothy Rybeck’s thorough investigation, one is left feeling unsatisfied. Even with Walter Benjamin as a guide, it is impossible to fully understand the mind of the mass murderer, and this is likely because there is no real mystery to uncover.

    Hitler, in his core, was empty and void. Attempting to comprehend him leads to nothingness. He was a blank slate who enjoyed reading.

  • How Tall Was Hitler? Documents and Pictures on His Height

    How Tall Was Hitler? Documents and Pictures on His Height

    • Adolf Hitler is believed to be around 5 feet 9 inches (175 cm) tall.
    • He appeared shorter in some photographs due to the taller stature of his generals and the Reichsführer-SS.
    • Hitler’s official records and photographs with Heinrich Himmler support his alleged height figure.

    The exact height of Adolf Hitler is debated. However, Hitler was 5 feet 9 inches (1.75 m) tall, according to various sources. Still, eyewitnesses at the 1936 Summer Olympics believe that Hitler was around 1.65 m (5 ft 5 in) tall, which was short even for the time. Photos from the 1938 Munich Conference, when four countries discussed Germany’s annexation of Sudetenland in advance of its invasion of Poland, show Hitler’s height around the same level as the other world leaders. However, considering how short Neville Chamberlain appears in the picture, the perspective is deceiving.

    The below picture shows Hitler’s height next to other leaders:

    1938 Munich Conference. The picture shows the heights of the leaders in comparison: Neville Chamberlain, Édouard Daladier, Adolf Hitler, and Benito Mussolini, from left to right.
    1938 Munich Conference. Neville Chamberlain, Édouard Daladier, Adolf Hitler, and Benito Mussolini, from left to right. (Image: Derived from public domain)

    Why Hitler Appeared Shorter in Pictures

    Hitler was not a small individual at the time; he was of average height. So why did he occasionally appear shorter in photographs? Hitler looked dwarfed in images with his generals and the rest of the Reichsführer-SS because they were generally taller people. Even though Hitler was similar in height to Julius Caesar, Caesar’s Roman army usually consisted of individuals of average height, which is why he was never perceived as short as Alexander the Great, Joseph Stalin, or Napoleon Bonaparte.

    The below photograph of Hitler with Heinrich Himmler attests to Hitler’s height as another solid piece of evidence. Himmler was the Reichsführer of the SS, and he stood 5 ft 8.5 in (1.74 m) tall. In the picture, Himmler and Hitler are of comparable stature, but Hitler actually stands a bit taller, which again supports that his height was 5’9″ (175 cm). Taking into account the average height of Austrian soldiers in WWII, which was 5’8″ (1.73 m), Hitler’s height was perfectly normal for the time.

    Hitler full body portrait, standing next to Heinrich Himmler who is 1.74 m or 5 ft 8.5 in. in height.
    Hitler standing next to Heinrich Himmler who is 5 ft 8.5 in or 1.74 m. (Colorized from Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-C05557 / CC-BY-SA 3.0)

    Official Records on Hitler’s Height

    In the below photograph of Adolf Hitler with his Fields Marshals during the German attack on Britain, Hitler appears to be the same height as Hermann Göring, 5’10” (1.78 m), despite standing in front of him. This again supports the claims regarding his height.

    Hitler next to Hermann Göring and his other Field Marshals.
    Hitler next to Hermann Göring and his other Field Marshals. (Image: Public Domain, colorized)

    Records from Landsberg Prison, where Hitler was imprisoned during the Beer Hall Putsch, also indicate this same height figure, with guards and those around him witnessing this measurement. Hitler was significantly shorter in comparison to his bodyguard Rochus Misch who stood at 6 ft 1 in (1.85 m) tall.

    Hitler and his bodyguard Rochus Misch.
    Hitler and his bodyguard Rochus Misch.

    In some pictures of Hitler with his partner Eva Braun, who stood at 5 ft 4.2 in (1.63 m), the height difference is less pronounced because she wore shoes with higher heels. But in other pictures, it is easy to see that Hitler was much taller.

    Unlike Stalin, Hitler is not known for using platform shoes to appear taller. Stalin even did that during the signing of the Hitler-Stalin non-aggression pact. Because even though Stalin stood at 5’4″ (1.62 m), he was known to wear platform shoes to appear at least 4 inches (10 cm) taller, just like Vladimir Putin does today.

    eva braun and hitler stands next to each other, full body portrait, eva braun is 1.63 m (5 ft 4.2 in) tall.
    Eva Braun and Adolf Hitler. (Bundesarchiv, CC BY-SA 3.0)

    Hitler’s Other Physical Characteristics

    Standing at a height of 5 ft 9 in, Hitler maintained a healthy weight of 154 pounds (70 kg). He did not smoke, drank alcohol only on rare occasions, and was an ardent vegetarian. Hitler’s blood and urine tests, according to his doctor Theodor Morell, were often clean. Other than some mild colds, he generally had a robust immune system and a strong physicality due to his peasant family background. He also handled the stresses of warfare efficiently.

    Hitler's full body height portrait, in NSDAP uniform with jackboots, 1932.
    Hitler in NSDAP uniform with jackboots, 1932. (Colorized from Bundesarchiv, Bild 146-1982-159-22A / CC-BY-SA 3.0)

    There are interesting stories about Hitler’s physical appearance; for example, it’s been reported that Hitler only had one testicle. Hitler was diagnosed with “right-side cryptorchidism,” a disorder in which a testicle fails to descend into the scrotum. This medical report originates from the time he was incarcerated after the failed Munich beer hall putsch in 1923.

    hitler and mussolini side by side, full body portraits. Their heights can be compared clearly.
    Mussolini (5 ft 6.5 in) and Hitler (5 ft 9 in), August 1941. (Public Domain)

    A Leader’s Height Does Matter

    A leader’s physical traits, like height and weight, can shape a nation’s destiny. This is because it’s always hard to tell at first glance how smart or moral a leader is, but it’s usually easier to see how strong and powerful they are.

    This is why symbols of authority, such as the crowns of European monarchs or the headdresses of Native American chiefs, not only signify wealth and power but also compensate for any perceived lack of height. An example of this is Louis XIV, who stood at only 5 feet 4 inches (1.62 m) tall but often wore high heels and a fluffy wig to enhance his image.

    Mussolini (5ft 6.5 in) and Hitler (5 ft 9 in) walking next to each other, full body photograph. September 1937.
    Mussolini (5 ft 6.5 in; 169 cm) and Hitler (5 ft 9 in; 175 cm), September 1937. (Public Domain)

    While physical strength and power may be components of the ideal leader image, the reality is much more complex. Hitler was able to successfully overthrow the much taller Paul von Hindenburg (6’6″; 1.98 m) through his skill and strategy.

    But Was He Tall Enough?

    According to Hitler’s doctrines, the ideal males were those with tall stature, fair skin, blue eyes, and blond hair—the Aryan race. The irony, however, is that contrary to Hitler’s own image of an Aryan, he did not meet this criterion. He was not tall in stature or superior in physique, nor did he have blonde hair. But he had blue eyes, so he was “half-Aryan” at best.

    Not only that, but Hitler was also not eligible to join the SS (Schutzstaffel) organization he created. Their height requirements varied annually. In 1937, SS applicants needed to be at least 6 feet (1.83 m) tall; by 1941, that requirement had been lowered to 5 feet, 9.3 inches (1.76 m).

    Hitler's full body photograph according to the US Army's official picture.
    Hitler, 1933. Image: U.S. Army.

    It is ironic that a man cannot satisfy the rules he has set for all other people. But is there a point to this? After all, rule-makers like tyrants rarely obey their own rules, preferring instead to consider themselves above the law they’ve enacted.

    Adolf Hitler is one of the most infamous leaders in world history. It’s easy to find all sorts of things to discuss about this man, and he’s the subject of more anecdotes than any other World War II leader. The question of his height has been a popular one, and we tried to answer that in this article.

  • The Price of a Slave in Ancient Rome in Today’s Dollars

    The Price of a Slave in Ancient Rome in Today’s Dollars

    During the era of Augustus and Julius Caesar, which was towards the end of the 1st century BC, records show that the value of a 20-year-old male slave in Rome was around 500 denarii (singular: denarius), as stated by the Roman historian Titus Livius. However, the cost of a female slave around the same age during that time was significantly higher, with prices ranging from 5,000 to 6,000 denarii, making them worth more than 10 times that of a male Roman slave. In Rome, the price of a slave with ordinary skills didn’t change much until the third century AD.

    The Price of Slaves in Dollars

    A denarius coin with portrait of Julius Caesar.
    A denarius coin with a portrait of Julius Caesar.

    During the 1st century BC, one denarius had the purchasing power to acquire eight loaves of bread in the city of Rome. By using the cost of bread as a reference point, it can be estimated that one denarius was roughly equivalent to $17 in today’s currency.

    When it comes to the value of Roman slaves, a male Roman slave would be valued at around $8,500, while a female Roman slave would be sold for a price of $85,000 to $100,000.

    For comparison, the historian Tacitus (56–120 AD) states that a legionary in the Roman army at the time of Julius Caesar received about 11 asses (around $11.5) a day as a wage (Tacitus, Ann. 1.17), and one denarius was 16 asses.

    In other sources, the legionaries were paid 225 denarii annually in the first century AD, which was reduced to 150 denarii after the deductions. But a centurion, the commander of the 80 legionaries, earned around 3,400 denarii. At the same time, 700 slaves were working on Rome’s aqueducts alone.

    The Factors That Affected the Price of a Slave

    Factors of several kinds were applied to this pricing. The condition of Roman slaves varied greatly. The value of a slave would range a lot based on factors such as his or her talents, expertise, language, proficiency, physical attributes, attractiveness, etc.

    Slaves who were employed or educated commanded a far greater price than those who were not. For instance, the value of slaves who possessed specialized skills, such as goldsmiths and Greek teachers, was significantly higher.

    There is historical evidence that a slave who was a highly regarded Greek teacher was sold for three talents of silver (a talent was 6,000 denarii), which was equivalent to around 80 kg of silver, 23,000 denarii, or $390,000, a price typically associated with the tutors of wealthy nobles.

    Julius Caesar and other Roman leaders reportedly paid thousands of denarii for the services of attractive slave women.

    Slaves were forced to stand almost naked with price tags on their chests.
    Slaves were forced to stand almost naked with price tags on their chests.

    The prices of the slaves of older age were not worth anything at all, and children were often sold for one-eighth the price of adults unless they had some kind of exceptional gifts, such as beauty, good looks, or a singing voice, since it required time and money for them to become a labor force.

    Slaves could be purchased in bulk from wholesalers or sold to merchants. Slave traders purchased vast numbers of soldiers from the Roman army at auction, and slaves were sold in retail stores by the hundreds. Slaves were forced to stand almost naked with price tags on their chests.

    During auctions, slaves with certain skills and those who were thought to be especially attractive were sold for more money.

    The Reasons Female Slaves Were Much More Valuable

    There are several theories as to why the price of female slaves was ten times higher than that of male slaves. These theories include:

    1. The city of Rome at the end of the 1st century had a population that was primarily composed of men from various regions. The ratio of men to women was significantly skewed, with men outnumbering women by a ratio of more than 7 to 3. Because of this disparity, female prostitutes were in high demand, and many female slaves were forced to work as prostitutes in the sex industry due to their high economic value.
    2. The price of female slaves was much higher because there were not enough women to do the other occupations designated “women’s labor” in Roman society, such as washing and cooking.
    3. Women were often purchased to serve as concubines (sexual slaves) for their male lords.

    These were some of the reasons for the rise in the value of women slaves in the Roman Republic and Empire.

    An Ancient Roman slave market by Jean Leon Gerome, 1884.
    An Ancient Roman slave market by Jean Leon Gerome, 1884. (Public Domain)

    The Source of Slaves in Rome

    It’s important to recognize that although many people equate all slavery with slavery in the United States, Roman slavery was much different. Many people of different races were held as slaves in Roman society because of the absence of racial distinctions between slaves and free citizens. In other words, people or slaves were not discriminated against because they were black, white, etc.

    The primary source of slaves for the Romans was captured individuals from defeated armies or battles. As one example, Caesar reportedly sold 53,000 people from a Gaulish city to slave dealers just after he conquered it (as recounted in his memoirs, “The Gallic Wars“). This was probably the entire population of the conquered area.

    After the close of the 2nd century BC, the Roman Republic and, subsequently, the Roman Empire, rapidly expanded throughout the known world. A lot of slaves from the areas that Rome took over, especially the populated Gaul (modern-day France), were brought to the Italian peninsula.

    people captured as slaves
    After a siege, the local people were captured and sold as slaves in Rome.

    The Change in Slave Prices in Rome

    By the end of the 1st century BC, over 40% of the Italian peninsula’s population was made up of slaves, owing much to the vast number of slaves captured by Rome, which had a significant impact on the demography. The market value of slaves also fell because of this increase in the total number of slaves.

    If we consider “Ancient Rome” to be the period between the founding of the Roman Republic and the collapse of the Western Roman Empire—roughly a millennium from 509 BC to 476 AD—slave prices in Rome rose and fell dramatically during this period.

    At the end of the 1st century BC, during the era of Caesar Augustus, which can be regarded as Rome’s pinnacle period, it is thought to have been the period when slave prices were at their lowest.

    Accordingly, the lowest price for a male slave about 20 years old was 500 denarii, as described previously, and the lowest price for a female slave was 5000–6000 denarii (around $8,500 for a male and $85,000 for a female), which was more than 10 times the price of a male slave.

    For example, findings from the city of Pompeii, which is famous for being buried by a volcanic explosion in 79 AD and then forgotten for about 100 years, show that the price of male slaves rose to 700 denarii at the time (about $12,000), which is a respectable increase.

    As Rome’s great military triumphs faded away, the price of slaves appears to have continued to increase while the slave population continued to drop.

    About the Denarius Price

    While it’s been stated that one denarius would be roughly equivalent to 17 US dollars in today’s currency, it’s not a straightforward calculation. The value of a denarius in ancient times was vastly different from what it is now, so any conversion price should be adjusted to accurately reflect this reality.

    For instance, a Roman worker’s annual income (around 400 denarii) would be about $6,800 if converted using this method. Furthermore, at the end of the 1st century, denarius silver coins were over 95% pure and composed nearly completely of silver, but by the 3rd century AD, some coins were less than 5% silver, causing significant inflation. Therefore, the value of the “denarius” was not constant.

    That is why the preceding pricing estimates for slaves in Rome should only be treated as rough estimates.

  • Genghis Khan’s Children: His Number of Sons and Daughters

    Genghis Khan’s Children: His Number of Sons and Daughters

    • Genghis Khan had 13 officially documented children.
    • He also allegedly had over 120 children from other wives and concubines.
    • His four sons Jochi, Chagatai, Ögedei, and Tolui later became notable figures.
    • Genghis Khan considered any child who called him ‘father’ his own.
    • His daughters formed alliances through marriages, expanding Mongol influence.

    Historical records on Genghis Khan’s number of children are incomplete. However, Genghis did have at least 13 children. He officially had eight sons and five daughters. His nine children (four sons and five daughters) were from his wife, Börte. Four of his sons from Börte were particularly notable, with one being the father of Kublai Khan, the greatest successor of the Great Khan. The oral tradition also claims that Genghis Khan had a total of 120 children with his many concubines and wives, who numbered 500.

    Genghis Khan’s Number of Children

    genghis khan with his four son children
    Genghis Khan next to his four prime sons: Chagatai, Jochi, Tolui, and Ögedei.

    His Daughters

    1. Alakhai Bekhi (1191–1230)
    2. Checheikhen (died c. 1237)
    3. Alaltun
    4. Tümelün
    5. Qocin Beki (Huochenbieji)

    Other than his five daughters, there was actually a sixth daughter named Tulgha. This lesser-known daughter of Genghis Khan was allegedly conceived by Qulan Khatun and the Qarluqs took her as a wife.

    His Sons

    1. Jochi (1182–1227)
    2. Chagatai (1183–1242)
    3. Ögedei (1186–1241)
    4. Tolui (1191–1232)
    5. Ulugci (Wuluchi)
    6. Chawuer (Cha’ur)
    7. Kölgen (Kuoliejian)
    8. Shuerche

    Jochi was Genghis Khan’s first child and son, followed by Chagatai, Ögedei, and Tolui, all from the same mother, Börte. In addition, Genghis Khan four more sons from other concubines named Wuluchi (Ulugci), Kölgen, Chawuer, and Shuerche. Among them, Kölgen became a notable Mongol general, and Tolui was Kublai Khan’s father.

    Ögedei Khan, one of genghis khan's children.
    Ögedei Khan, artwork.

    In 1226, Genghis Khan launched his last invasion of China, and he passed away on August 18th, 1227. The Mongol Empire continued to grow under the leadership of Genghis Khan’s numerous children. Every one of his four sons created a sizable nation. His many children and other descendants ruled an area that stretched from the coast of the China Sea to the European region of Russia.

    Genghis Had 500 Wives and Concubines

    • Genghis Khan had 44 wives and over 500 concubines.
    • His descendants comprise 0.5% of the world’s male population.

    Genghis Khan’s five sons alone (including Kuoliejian) gave him 43 grandchildren. We also know that Genghis Khan had 44 documented wives and more than 500 concubines. However, only six of his wives were considered higher-ranking khatuns “great empresses”, with Börte being the highest-ranked.

    His alleged 500 concubines were mostly captives from the peoples and nations Genghis conquered. That is why there is a good chance that Genghis Khan is the historical figure with the widest spread of his descendants throughout the globe.

    Due to his numerous wives, Genghis Khan’s children are the ancestors of as many as 20 million males today, or around 0.5% of all men on the planet. His numerous offspring make up around 8% of the Central Asian population.

    For instance, there are 43 grandchildren in the third generation of his line alone. Even Genghis Khan was unsure of his family’s size. After all, he could have slept with women everywhere he traveled toward the west, and he had no say over who gave birth to his child whatsoever.

    His Great Harem: Four Ordos of Genghis

    • Genghis Khan’s personal harem comprised four distinct ordos (palaces).
    • Börte Khatun, his first wife, held the highest rank among empresses.

    The personal harem of Genghis Khan was enormous. Housing such a large number of wives and concubines presented significant challenges. Therefore, Genghis Khan had four distinct harems, which the Mongols referred to as the “Four Ordos,” so that he could better organize his spouses. These four ordos (which means “palaces”) were entrusted to Börte (Börte Üjin), Khulan, Yesui, and Yesugen, the four principal wives of Genghis Khan. Yesugen also gave birth to Chawuer (Cha’ur) who died before adulthood.

    His spouses had ranks descending from great empress (khatun) to empress and concubine. All of Genghis’ wives, concubines, and children had their own yurts (households), which were overseen by the four queens. Börte Khatun, the first and greatest of the empresses, lived in the first yurt. She was the first wife of Genghis Khan, and she had the highest rank among the four queens. Also, Genghis Khan fully acknowledged Börte’s four sons as his rightful heirs. With his other children, though, he was not as involved.

    Genghis Khan’s Eight Sons

    • His first four sons, born to Börte, became influential Mongol leaders.
    • The Great Khan also had lesser-known sons like Kuoliejian, Wuluchi, and Chawuer.

    All four sons of Genghis Khan from Börte became powerful figures in the Mongol Empire. They also became the most famous of Genghis Khan’s children. Genghis Khan’s other alleged children, Kuoliejian, Wuluchi, Chawuer, and Shuerche, three of whom died young, all had different mothers. That’s why they are mentioned less frequently in history. Genghis Khan favored Kuoliejian among his secondary sons, and Kuoliejian was later blessed with four sons.

    Jochi (1182–1227)

    Genghis Khan's eldest son Jochi Khan.
    Genghis Khan’s eldest son Jochi Khan. (Photo by Enerelt, CC BY-SA 3.0)
    • Jochi, born to Börte, was respected in the Mongol Empire.
    • His skill on the battlefield resulted in important accomplishments.

    The eldest son, Jochi, born to Börte, was a general in the Mongol Empire. He is known for his participation in battles to conquer the Jin State, Western Xia, and Central Asia. Lands in the western section of the Mongol Empire were allocated to Jochi as part of Genghis Khan’s tribute.

    According to legend, Börte was not pregnant when she was taken away by the rival Merkit tribe. However, when Temujin (aka Genghis Khan), with the help of his tribe, sent troops to rescue Börte, she was already heavily pregnant. She later gave birth to Jochi (also Jöchi or Juchi).

    If the Mongols had placed a high value on blood, they would not have married so many women from diverse cultures. For Genghis, a child would always be considered his own son as long as the child called him ‘father’. That’s why Genghis called the baby “Jochi,” which means “guest” in Mongolian.

    Among Temujin’s many sons, Jochi had the greatest battle achievements. But in 1222, Jochi stopped taking part in Genghis Khan’s wars. Genghis Khan believed that Jochi was intending to kill him, but during Temujin’s mobilization of troops, Jochi became critically ill and died at the age of 45.

    After Genghis Khan’s western expedition, the hereditary territory of the Mongolian Khans of the Jochi line was established as the “Ulus of Jochi”, also referred to as the Kipchak Khanate or Golden Horde (1242–1502).

    Jochi’s lands were split among his sons. His firstborn, Orda, established the White Horde, while his second, Batu, established the Golden Horde.

    Jochi had a total of 14 sons:

    • Orda (the eldest)
    • Batu
    • Berke
    • Berkhechir
    • Shiban
    • Tangad
    • Teval
    • Chilagun
    • Sinqur
    • Chimbay
    • Muhammed
    • Udur
    • Tuqa-Timur
    • Shingum

    Chagatai (1183–1242)

    Genghis Khan's second son Chagatai Khan.
    Genghis Khan’s second son Chagatai Khan. (Photo by Enerelt, CC BY-SA 3.0)
    • Chagatai founded the Chagatai Khanate after Genghis Khan’s death.
    • He had 7 sons, including Baiju and Baidar, from concubines.

    Chagatai, Genghis Khan’s second son, also born to Börte, founded the Chagatai Khanate (1227–1363). After Genghis Khan died, Chagatai took over as the vassal emperor of Kashgar and much of Transoxiana (between the Amu and Syr Darya rivers).

    Chagatai had 7 sons and the last four of them were from his concubines:

    • Mutukan (the eldest)
    • Belgesh
    • Yesü Möngk
    • Mochi Yebe
    • Sarban
    • Baidar
    • Baiju.

    Chagatai inherited the five modern-day nations in Central Asia. Also, Genghis Khan tasked him with seeing that his written code of law, the Yassa, was really put into practice. Chagatai was held in high regard for around 14 years as a fair and capable leader. Despite having many children, it was Qara Hülegü, his grandson, who took control after his death.

    Ögedei (1186–1241)

    Genghis Khan's third son Ögedei Khan.
    Genghis Khan’s third son Ögedei Khan. (Photo by Enerelt, CC BY-SA 3.0)
    • Ögedei was the first to use the title “khagan.”
    • He had seven sons, including Güyük and Kadan, during his rule.

    Ögedei, the third son of Genghis Khan, was also born to Börte. He was supported and enthroned in 1229 AD to manage the entire Mongol Empire. Throughout his father’s rise to power, Ögedei was involved in a number of conflicts. When referring to himself, he was the first Mongol leader to use the Turkic title “khagan,” which means “great khan.” He married Töregene and was a key figure in the Mongol conquest of the Khwarazmian Empire.

    Ögedei had seven sons in total:

    • Güyük (the eldest)
    • Koden
    • Köchü
    • Qarachar
    • Qashi
    • Kadan
    • Melig

    He inherited his father’s mandate to expand the territory and went south to destroy the Jin Dynasty of North China, also sending his nephew, Batu Khan (1205–1255), the founder of the Golden Horde, to conquer Europe. During his reign, his territory expanded to include Central Asia, North China, and Eastern Europe. In 1271, Kublai Khan, the founder of the Yuan Dynasty, listed Ögedei as “Taizong” on his official record.

    Tolui (1191–1232)

    Genghis Khan's fourth son Tolui Khan.
    Genghis Khan’s fourth son Tolui Khan. (W. Commons)
    • Tolui, Genghis Khan’s youngest son, supervised the country after Ögedei’s reign.
    • Tolui had 11 sons, including Möngke Khan and Kublai Khan.

    Mongol culture emphasized the need to keep the youngest child on the main base since he was not capable enough for an expedition yet. Tolui, the fourth son of Genghis Khan and also born to Börte, stayed with his parents and inherited his father’s offices, pastureland, and army. When Ögedei succeeded to the throne, Tolui supervised the country. Kublai Khan, the greatest successor of Genghis Khan, was Tolui’s fourth child.

    Tolui had a total of 11 sons:

    • Möngke Khan (the eldest)
    • Kublai Khan
    • Hulagu Khan
    • Ariq Böke
    • Qutuqtu
    • El-Temür
    • Jörike
    • Möge
    • Böchök
    • Sögetei
    • Sübügetei

    Tolui’s son Kublai posthumously bestowed upon him the title of Chinese emperor, though he never used it in his lifetime, even if he had never used the title of Khagan himself. His father’s sister-in-law, Altani, saved Tolui from a Tatar who was ready to murder him when he was five. In 1213, Tolui and his brother-in-law, Chiqu, participated in their first battle against the Jin dynasty by storming the walls of Dexing.

    Prior to his death, Genghis Khan designated his own son, Ögedei, as his successor. At the time of his passing in 1227, Genghis Khan commanded a formidable army of 129,000 soldiers. Upon his death, a portion of these troops, totaling 28,000, were distributed among his many siblings and children. The lion’s share of these soldiers, numbering over 100,000, were bequeathed to his youngest son, Tolui, since he was a skilled military leader. Notably, this group also included the vast majority of the elite Mongolian cavalry.

    Wuluchi (Ulugci)

    It is likely that Wuluchi’s (or Ulugci’s) mother, a Tatar woman, was the khatun Yesui, one of Genghis Khan’s principal khatuns. Since she was a queen of Genghis, it is clear that Wuluchi did not have a particularly low social standing among Genghis Khan’s many other sons. But he did not appear to be a general in the Mongol army, unlike Kölgen, another son of Genghis.

    Chawuer

    Not much is known about Chawuer. However, Chawuer was born into a royal mother too; her mother was a queen of Genghis Khan, and she ranked fourth among the four queens that managed Genghis Khan’s great harems (the Four Ordos) and the concubine yurts.

    Kölgen (Kuoliejian) (1188–1238)

    kulkan (kölgen) or kyul khan, one of genghis khan's children

    From a position of standing, he was not a “nobody” as well. Kölgen was Khulan Khatun’s only son, the youngest khatun of Genghis Khan. She was Genghis’ second favorite wife. Therefore, Kölgen was second only to Genghis Khan’s other sons from Börte. He accompanied Genghis Khan on one of his famous western expeditions.

    Khulan Hatun of Uvas Merkits, a Tatar by birth and a Mongolian by adoption, gave birth to Kölgen during the Mongol invasions in 1188. In 1238, in the Siege of Kolomna, he met his demise while leading the army under Batu Khan in the Kipchak campaign.

    During the conquest of the Russian Principalities, he was the only börçigin to lose his life. The oldest of Kölgen’s four sons, Kucha, was also the most famous. During the Mongol era in China, Hucha’s son Uguday received a royal title in 1265, and his son Ebugen succeeded him.

    In 1287, he was stripped of the royal title and executed because of his participation in the rebellion against Kublai Khan. In 1313, a man named “Grandson of the Kölgen” was given the title “Khan”, and his son Dorjban succeeded him.

    Kölgen is also called Kyul Khan, Kulkan, Kuoliejian, Gelejian, and Küregen, depending on the source. The character Kulkan appears in the book “Baty” by Vasili Yang.

    Shuerche

    For Shuerche, things were quite different. It is unknown who his mother was; however, she was a member of the medieval Naiman tribe, a notorious Genghis Khan adversary that Genghis first defeated in 1199 and later in 1203, ending their last khan.

    Genghis Khan’s Five Daughters

    • Genghis Khan’s daughters, like Alakhai Bekhi, played key roles as regents.
    • Checheikhen’s marriage to Torolchi established Mongol dominance over trade routes.

    Each of Genghis Khan’s known daughters married a prominent individual of the time. The candidates were hand-picked and were allies who declared their allegiance to Genghis Khan. The only fact known about Tümelün (one of Genghis’ daughters) is that she married her cousin Chigu, who was the son of Alchi, who was born to Teyin (Dei Seichen), Börte’s father.

    There was also a sixth daughter named Tulgha who was allegedly conceived by Qulan Khatun and the Qarluqs took her as a wife.

    Alakhai Bekhi (1191–1230)

    Genghis Khan’s daughter from his first marriage to Börte, Alakhai Bekhi, was a powerful figure in the background of his rule and acted as a regent over the parts of China he conquered. To show his gratitude to the Ongud, one of Genghis Khan’s allies, Alakhai was engaged to an Ongud relative in 1206. Genghis Khan formed this alliance to further his conquests beyond the Gobi Desert.

    Though her husband was killed during a revolt by the Ongud in 1211, Alakhai was able to escape and put down the uprising with the help of her father. She eventually married her stepson Jingue, and the two of them raised a child they called Negudei. Alakhai was well-known for her devotion to her family’s traditions, her interest in medical and holy books, her promotion of literacy, and her daily reading habit.

    In the wake of Jingue’s death, she married another of her stepsons, Boyaohe, and saw to it that Boyaohe and his children were married off to members of the Borjigin Clan, the clan of Genghis Khan, so that they might further their own political interests.

    Checheikhen (died c. 1237)

    The marriage of Genghis Khan’s daughter Checheikhen to Torolchi, a descendant of the Oirat leader Khudugha Beki, took place in 1207 as part of a peace treaty between the Mongol leader and the Oirat tribe. It was through her marriage that Mongol hegemony was established over the northern trade routes, and the territories under her sisters’ control grew increasingly economically connected.

    Sad to say, after Checheikhen’s death in 1237, her brother, Ögedei Khan, seized power in the Oirat territories and is suspected of having perpetrated acts of brutality against the Oirat people. Orghana was one of Checheikhen’s daughters; Oghul Qaimish could have been another.

    Qocin Beki (Huochenbieji)

    Qochin Beki (Bekhi or Begi) was supposedly the oldest of Genghis Khan’s daughters by Borte, but not much more is known about her. Genghis Khan gave Qocin Beki as a bride to the Ikires people, namely Butu Küregen. Butu was previously the husband of Genghis Khan’s sister, Temulin, until her death.

    The Ikires were a branch of the Khongirads, one of the largest Mongol groups in the 1100s. It is often believed that the Khongirad people are descended from the long-vanished Wuku or Wugu people. Qocin Beki is also called as Khochen Beki.

    Alaltun

    Genghis Khan had a daughter with an unnamed concubine; she was actually known as Il-Alti, Il-Altun, or Ile Khatun (Qatun), and the name “Alaltun” was a mistake in transcription. She was one of nine half-siblings, although four of them didn’t make it to adulthood.

    After Genghis Khan had won the obedience and devotion of the Uyghur leader Barjuk Idi-Qut, he promised Il-Alti to him as a reward. However, the marriage never took place since Idi-Qut already had a main spouse and Il-Alti had passed away.

    The promise was tried to be fulfilled by Il-Alti’s half-brother Ögedei, who became Khan after Genghis Khan’s death, but it was too late. Some say that Il-Alti was executed by Ögedei’s supporters because she poisoned Ögedei; others say that her execution was unfair and against Genghis Khan’s Yassa (law code).

    Throughout the history of the Mongol Empire, Il-Alti stood out as both the leader of the Uyghurs and a heroic figure. Rashid al-Din, a Persian historian, claims that among Genghis Khan’s 13 children, she was his favorite daughter.

    References

    1. Genghis Khan’s Life – Google Books
    2. Genghis Khan’s family tree: History of International Relations – Google Books
    3. Some remarks on the deaths of Mongol Khans – (core.ac.uk)