Tag: roman

  • Elagabalus: The Eccentric Emperor of the Severan Dynasty

    Elagabalus: The Eccentric Emperor of the Severan Dynasty

    During the time of the Roman Empire, there was a period known as the Severan Dynasty. This era had a series of emperors who made various impacts on the empire. One of these emperors, Elagabalus (originally named Varius Avitus Bassianus), became a symbol of the controversies of that time.

    The Severan Dynasty was a period of change in the Roman Empire, starting with Septimius Severus in AD 193. He was renowned for his military skill, and his rule established a dynasty that included his descendants Caracalla, Geta, and, as we’ll discuss in this article, Elagabalus.

    Elagabalus, born in AD 204, stepped into the world of imperial politics when he was quite young, which was different from the usual experienced Roman rulers. When he became the Roman emperor, his rule was known for its focus on religion, immoderate behavior, and many scandals.

    Before Elagabalus, there was another emperor named Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, also known as Caracalla. Caracalla was known for being quite brutal, even going so far as to order the killing of his own brother, Geta, in 211 AD. During his rule, he focused a lot on military actions and strengthening his authority. One notable thing he did was grant Roman citizenship to almost every free citizen living in the Empire through something called the Constitutio Antoniniana, or the Edict of Caracalla, in 212 AD.

    Elagabalus: Early Life and Ascension

    A sculpture of Julia Soaemias
    A sculpture of Julia Soaemias, 3rd century AD. Wolfgang Sauber, CC BY-SA 3.0.

    Emperor Elagabalus, originally named Varius Avitus Bassianus, was born in AD 204 into a well-known family connected to the ruling Severan Dynasty. His early life had circumstances that would later lead him to become the Roman Emperor.

    Even though he was just 14 years old, Elagabalus became the new Roman emperor. His grandmother, Julia Maesa, really wanted their family to rule the empire again after Caracalla was killed. Thanks to her clever moves and power, Elagabalus was made emperor in AD 218. Elagabalus was younger than most Roman emperors in Roman history.

    Elagabalus’s journey to power and his time as emperor were unconventional, with some strange actions on his part and the involvement of notable individuals. One notable person who chronicled this period in Roman history was the historian Lucius Cassius Dio.

    According to Cassius Dio, Elagabalus had some unusual habits. He liked to be called “Lady” and dressed in women’s clothes. He even promised a reward to any doctor who could make him physically become a woman. Dio also tells us about Elagabalus’s fancy parties, where he would cover his guests in flowers and perfume.

    He went as far as having flower-filled chariots race through the city streets. Elagabalus’s marriages were quite unconventional too. Dio mentions that he even married a Vestal Virgin, which was a serious violation of Roman religious traditions and caused quite a scandal.

    The Cult of Elagabal

    This is a Roman gold coin called an aureus, and it shows a picture of Elagabalus. On the back, it reads "To the Holy Sun God Elagabal" in Latin.
    This is a Roman gold coin called an aureus, and it shows a picture of Elagabalus. On the back, it reads “To the Holy Sun God Elagabal” in Latin. Image: CNG, CC BY-SA 3.0.

    Emperor Elagabalus introduced a significant religious transformation during his reign, centered around the deity Elagabal (Elagabalus, Aelagabalus, Heliogabalus), from whom he derived his name. This new religion was distinguished by novel customs. It represented a break with conventional Roman beliefs.

    Elagabal, the sun god, was first worshipped in Emesa, which is now modern-day Homs, Syria. This is where Elagabalus’ family came from. The young emperor was really into the Elagabal cult and wanted to make this god more important in the Roman pantheon.

    Religious Reforms and Controversies

    Elagabalus made some changes to the religion in Rome. He built a new temple for Elagabal, a god he really liked, and in this temple, there was a special black stone that symbolized the god. This stone was brought from Emesa to Rome. Elagabalus wanted people to worship Elagabal more than the usual Roman gods like Jupiter.

    The shift in religious beliefs created a ton of disagreements and pushbacks in Roman society. It impacted everyday people, the Senate, and even the military. Elagabalus made things worse by introducing foreign gods and customs while disregarding Roman traditions, leading to widespread unrest throughout the empire.

    The Historia Augusta has some interesting stories. One of them is about Elagabalus, who’s said to have done some questionable stuff in the palace, like allegedly acting as a prostitute and marrying lots of people, including his chariot driver. He also liked exotic animals and would let them loose in the palace for entertainment.

    Eccentric Reign and Controversies

    Heliogabalus, High Priest of the Sun,1866-Simeon Solomon (1840-1905)
    Heliogabalus, High Priest of the Sun, 1866. Simeon Solomon (1840-1905). Image: Public Domain.

    An Extravagant Life

    In the relatively short period of his reign, Elagabalus exhibited a clear preference for opulence and grandiose displays. He organized feasts characterized by the extravagant use of valuable resources and extravagant dishes. This was a bit concerning because the Roman Empire was having economic problems at that time.

    Personal Life and Relationships

    One of the most striking controversies during Elagabalus’s rule centered around his stance on gender. He openly expressed a preference to be recognized as a woman and even entered into a marriage with a man. This move greatly scandalized Roman societal conventions.

    Elagabalus engaged in numerous marriages and divorces, often with little time in between. One of his best-known unions was with Aquilia Severa, who held the esteemed position of Vestal Virgin, a role of great religious significance in ancient Rome. This marriage was particularly scandalous because it went against the sacred commitment to chastity that Vestal Virgins were obligated to maintain.

    Controversies and Opposition

    Elagabalus’s unusual behavior and religious approach did not sit well with the Roman Senate which held significant political influence. Tensions between the emperor and the Senate escalated. This created political conflict.

    The emperor’s neglect of Roman military customs upset the legions. His concentration on religion and his choice of personal pleasure over military matters made people worry about the empire’s stability.

    Herodian’s account highlights Elagabalus’s extravagant banquets and parties. He discusses the influence of Elagabalus’s mother, Julia Maesa, and the Praetorian Guard on the emperor’s rule. Herodian generally portrays a moral decay during Elagabalus’s reign.

    Governance and Challenges

    Bust of Elagabalus
    Bust of Elagabalus, Palazzo Nuovo, Musei Capitolini. Image: José Luiz, CC BY-SA 4.0.

    Inexperienced Leadership

    Elagabalus, who ascended to power at a young age, faced a significant challenge due to his limited experience in governance. Instead of focusing on ruling, he devoted resources to his religious pursuits. This diversion of funds occurred at a time when the Roman Empire was grappling with financial difficulties. The imperial treasury was already strained, and desperate measures, such as devaluing Roman currency, were taken in an attempt to bolster finances. These actions only exacerbated the empire’s financial problems.

    Military Conflicts and Invasions

    While Elagabalus was in charge, the Roman Empire had some problems with the Parthian Empire in the East. He didn’t pay much attention to the affairs of the army, which weakened Rome when dealing with these issues.

    The Roman frontiers had to deal with attacks from different outsider groups, like Germanic tribes and other barbarians. The emperor’s struggle to deal with these border threats made the security situation even worse.

    Decline and Removal from Power

    Aquilia Severa
    Bust possibly depicting Aquilia Severa. Image: CC0.

    Plot Against Elagabalus

    Elagabalus’s rule became increasingly unpopular among different groups in Roman society. The Senate, the military, and the general population were all unhappy with his way of governing. Some Praetorian Guard members devised a plan to remove him from power in the year 222 AD.

    A dramatic conspiracy unfolded against Elagabalus, resulting in a forceful overthrow. Elagabalus and his mother, Julia Soaemias, met their demise at the hands of the Praetorian Guard. Elagabalus’s rule had spanned merely a few years and ended when he was just 18 years old.

    Legacy

    Elagabalus had a brief rule, but it left a big mark on the Roman Empire. After him, Alexander Severus wanted to steer clear of the controversies during Elagabalus’s time and bring back order. Elagabalus’s reign was a lesson for later Roman emperors to remember to honor the old Roman ways and institutions.

    After Elagabalus’s assassination, the Senate declared damnatio memoriae against him. This meant that they sought to erase his memory from the historical record as a form of censure for his actions and reign. Efforts were made to remove or deface inscriptions, statues, and references to Elagabalus. His images were also destroyed or altered. Despite these efforts, some information about Elagabalus’s reign and actions has survived through historical accounts.

    Elagabalus at a Glance

    What impact did Elagabalus’s reign have on the Roman Empire?

    Elagabalus’ rule is commonly viewed as a time of confusion and declining moral standards. It made the Roman Senate less influential and added to the larger issues the Third Century faced. During this era, there were many different emperors coming and going, and the empire had to deal with various external threats.

    Who succeeded Elagabalus as Roman Emperor?

    Following the murder of Elagabalus in 222 AD, his cousin Alexander Severus took over as the Roman Emperor. Alexander Severus aimed to bring back order and the old Roman ways to the empire.

    What is the significance of the Severan Dynasty in Roman history?

    The Severan Dynasty, which lasted from 193 to 235 AD, was a Roman ruling family. They had emperors like Septimius Severus, Caracalla, and Elagabalus. During their rule, the Roman Empire went through big changes and problems, like wars, family fights for power, and economic issues.

    What led to the downfall of Elagabalus as Emperor?

    Elagabalus stirred up quite a bit of trouble because of his unusual religious beliefs and his complete disregard for the way things were done in ancient Rome. He lived a really lavish life and didn’t care much about what the Roman Senate had to say. In the end, he was assassinated when he was just 18, in a coup, and his cousin Alexander Severus took over as ruler.

  • How Long Did Europeans Consider Themselves “Romans”?

    How Long Did Europeans Consider Themselves “Romans”?

    The term “Romans” was often associated with a sense of connection to the Roman Empire and its legacy. Many Russian Tsars claimed themselves to be the successors of the Eastern Roman Empire, also known as the Byzantine Empire. Hence the Latin name for Roman emperors, “caesar”, is where the word “tsar” originates. This claim served as a legal and historical justification for Russia’s southward expansion and particularly its intervention in the Balkan Peninsula. The same can be said for the Ottoman Empire in Turkey: in 1453, Mehmed the Conqueror named himself “Kaiser-i Rum” or “Caesar of the Romans”.

    Do Romanians Consider Themselves Romans?

    How Long Did Europeans Consider Themselves "Romans"

    In the immediate aftermath of the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 AD, there was a decline in direct identification with Roman heritage. However, elements of Roman culture, law, and governance continued to inspire many European cultures that were once part of the Empire.

    There are still people who hold such beliefs: They are the Romanians. The Romanian national anthem Awaken Thee, Romanian (also the former national anthem of Moldova) contains the following lyrics:

    Wake up Romanians from your sleep of death
    Into which you’ve been sunk by the barbaric tyrants.
    Now or never, sow a new fate for yourself
    To which even your cruel enemies will bow!

    Now or never, let us show the world
    That through these arms, Roman blood still flows;
    And that in our chests we still proudly bear a name
    Triumphant in battles, the name of Trajan!

    “Deșteaptă-te, române!” The national anthem of Romania and the former national anthem of Moldova.

    During the reign of Emperor Trajan (r. 98–117 AD), the Roman Empire reached its zenith, and present-day Romania was part of its territory. Today, the Romanians still take pride in their Roman roots, which can be traced back to the empire. In fact, the name “Romania” itself means “Land of the Romans” in Latin.

    So, there are Europeans who still consider themselves “Romans” today. But even outside of Romania, there are remnants of Roman influence that persisted for a considerable period of time.

    The Last of the Romans

    The idea of a “Holy Roman Empire” developed throughout the Middle Ages, especially between the 8th and 15th centuries. Despite being separate from the actual Roman Empire, this group claimed descent from the city of Rome and saw its populace as “Romans,” while working to maintain and revitalize Roman customs.

    Its emperors, like Charlemagne, highlighted their ties to the Roman Empire, and its territory included portions of modern-day Germany, Italy, and Central Europe.

    In fact, Europeans continued to use the title “Holy Roman Emperor” up until 1806, when the Austrian Empire, which emerged in the wake of the Napoleonic Empire, formally dissolved the title.

    However, the actual use of this title was merely as “Emperor” or “Emperor of the Romans” (in Latin: Imperator Romanorum, in German: Kaiser der Römer). Whether the people of Germany and Austria truly considered themselves “Romans” is a separate matter, but the term “Roman Empire” remained longer than the original nation.

    Therefore, the name of the country governing the region now known as Germany continued to incorporate “Rome” until the 19th century. It is unclear how long the people in the present-day German region considered themselves “Romans,” but this formal designation endured.

    Moreover, Napoleon Bonaparte named his son Napoleon II the “King of Rome.” Napoleon himself sought coronation from the Pope in Rome, emphasizing the continuity with Rome. Thus, the title of Emperor of the French also symbolized a strong connection to Rome and the Romans.

    The Nations That Considered Themselves Romans

    The Russian monarchs, or Tsars, claimed descent from the Romans and founded a new concept of an empire they called the ‘Third Rome’. They considered themselves the inheritors of the Byzantine Empire, the Eastern Roman Empire, and claimed to be the rightful successors to the Roman imperial legacy. This concept was first formulated in the 15th–16th centuries in the Tsardom of Rus’.

    The Austro-Hungarian Empire, often known as the Habsburg Empire, always insisted that it was rightfully titled “Emperor of the Romans.” The Habsburgs ensured the survival of the medieval-era Holy Roman Empire. The Habsburg rulers retained the titles of Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary even though the empire was primarily symbolic by the time of World War I.

    The Ottomans, too, claimed they were the rightful heirs to the throne of Rome. The Ottomans considered Constantinople (today’s Istanbul) to be the legitimate continuation of the Roman imperial capital since they recognized themselves as the rightful heirs of the Eastern Roman Empire. By calling themselves “Kayser-i Rûm,” or “Caesar of the Romans,” they drew attention to the fact that their empire was descended from the Romans.

    In Italy, during the era of Benito Mussolini’s fascist party (until 1945), there was a serious political appeal at the national level to foreground the “Roman identity.” This appeal, however, came to an end. The term “popolo di eroi” (people of heroes), as mentioned in the fascist party anthem, referred to the Romans, who envisioned the revival of a new Roman Empire centered around the Mediterranean.

    Hail, people of heroes,
    hail, immortal Fatherland,
    your sons were born again
    with the faith and the ideal.
    Your warriors’ valour,
    your pioneers’ virtue,
    Alighieri’s vision,
    today shines in every heart.

    “Giovinezza” (Italian for ‘Youth’), official hymn of the Italian National Fascist Party,

    Adolf Hitler‘s Nazi Party (National Socialist German Workers’ Party) later adopted the raised-arm salute that the fascist party had previously borrowed from the Roman salute. This political symbolism aimed to evoke a sense of connection to the glorious and imperial past of ancient Rome.

    However, other European powers did not accept these claims. And this historical discrepancy regarding the European nations considering themselves “Romans” has been a source of various conflicts up to this day.

    When Did Europeans Detach from the Roman Identity?

    Up until the First World War, there were a few more countries vying for the title of Roman Emperor alongside Russia, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey, regardless of whether other countries recognized them or not.

    However, the European powers, including Western and Southern Europe, which were once considered part of the so-called Roman world, gradually detached their countries from the Roman identity.

    This began as early as the time of Henry VIII, the former King of England, during the period of religious revolution when many peripheral countries shifted from Latin to their local languages as the court and church languages in the 16th century. The complete disintegration of the Holy Roman Empire, which had already become a mere formality, occurred around the Napoleonic Wars (1803–1815).

    The End of “Romans”

    The dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire during the Napoleonic Wars marked the disappearance of any entity in Western Europe claiming the title of Roman Emperor and their populace as “Romans”.

    During this period, the concept of nation-states emerged, leading to the complete abandonment of a conscious affiliation with Rome and the Roman populace. These underlying perceptions still contribute to the complex relationship between Western Europe and countries like Turkey and Russia today.

    Today, Romania and the Romanian people are the only European nation that openly and officially consider themselves “Romans,” who were once the citizens of the Roman Empire and ruled by the Roman Emperor Trajan (53 AD–117 AD).

  • History of Why Christmas is Celebrated on December 25

    History of Why Christmas is Celebrated on December 25

    Many mysteries surround Christmas, including the origins of Santa Claus and the 25th of December, the day we celebrate Christmas. Despite the fact that it has become more commercialized, Christmas remains a festival with profound roots in our culture. It’s hardly surprising that this holiday has a plethora of traditions because of this. However, their histories are often shrouded in mystery. For what reason is it that Christmas is always celebrated on December 25?

    Christmas vs. the winter solstice

    As the saying goes, “For on the 25th of December occurs this incision, which is a turning point, and it begins to grow the day when the light gets the increase…” (“Epiphanius,” 310–403 AD)

    It’s not a fluke that Christmas is observed on December 24 and 25. It is not so much because Jesus Christ was traditionally born on this day, but because of the importance this day has always had throughout history, even before the advent of Christianity. This day, the winter solstice, was a gift from the gods. The winter solstice is the day at which daylight hours once again start to lengthen. Almost every culture and faith have a ritual or holiday honoring the “winning of the light over darkness.”

    A celebration of the sun gods on the winter solstice

    Mithraism
    Slaying of the bull: The Indo-Iranian god Mithras (Akkadian for “contract”) was revered as the patron of contract, friendship, and order by devotees of Mithraism in the Roman world.

    In the early centuries, Christianity was only one of many religions practiced in the Mediterranean area, and as a result, many different cults and practices merged. Mithraism was widely practiced, as were festivals honoring Dionysus, the deity of the Thracians. In ancient Greece, Dionysus was revered as a deity of growth and fertility. Days “grew” to show his impact on the world. Conversely, those who adhered to the Mithraic religion honored an Indian deity of light.

    This faith spread from Mesopotamia and the Near East with the rise of the Roman Empire and was officially recognized as the Roman state religion in the 4th century CE. Since then, the winter solstice had been recognized as an imperial feast, the birth of the “Sol Invictus” (the “invincible sun”). Winter solstice celebrations honoring the birth of a deity are not unique to Christianity. In ancient Egypt, this same day marked the feast of the goddess Isis and the birth of the child Horus. Sol Invictus was originally a Syrian god. The Saturnalia, the festival of Saturn, was part of Sol Invictus worship as well.

    When exactly was the birth of Christ?

    Why do we celebrate Christmas on December 25?
    Sol Invictus in the Planetarium mosaic. (Image: Daniel González Acuña)

    Christianity faced severe competition from long-standing religions and traditions as it struggled to gain a foothold in the ancient world. To the first Christians, the only festival was Passover; they had not yet comprehended celebrating Jesus’ birth. Church authorities didn’t try to pin down certain dates in Christ’s life or the year he was born until after the new religion had already taken hold and grown. After that, they tried to form a calendar of celebrations.

    According to the mythology and these calculations, Christ could not have been born in the midst of winter. The birth would have occurred between spring and fall if the “there were shepherds camping in the neighborhood” (Luke 2:8) hint was to be accepted, as it is the only time of year when Judean shepherds would have been outdoors with their flocks. This reasoning also hinted at the days of March 28th, April 2nd, or May 20th. Yet it was obvious from the start that these rather obscure dates would not be able to impose themselves against the well-established festivals of the “Pagan” cults. The church had to do something about it.

    The incorporation of a Pagan holiday

    The Apostolic Tradition is credited to a Roman statue, perhaps of Hippolytus, discovered in 1551.
    The Apostolic Tradition is credited to a Roman statue, perhaps of Hippolytus, discovered in 1551.

    When Pope Hippolytus promoted December 25 as the date of Christ’s birth, the Church went on the offensive in the year 217. He planned to gradually inject Christian significance into the holiday’s traditional Pagan context. During this period, Christian belief and practice grew and gained more traction.

    Everything was ratified in the year 330: Emperor Constantine made Christianity the official state religion of Rome and abruptly converted the ancient sun deity of Sol Invictus to the Christian god, who became known as “Lux Mundi” (Light of the World) and “created the sun of justice.” As a result, the date of Christ’s birth, December 25, has been set as a dogma of the Christian faith ever since the year 381.

    However, it took many centuries for the new Christian celebration to triumph over the preexisting Germanic and Celtic sun and fertility rituals around the winter solstice in Central and Northern Europe. It wasn’t until a synod in central Europe in 813 that December 25 was officially recognized as a universal church feast instead of a Pagan festival.


    Bibliography

    1. Allen Brent, 1995. Hippolytus and the Roman Church in the Third Century. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-10245-3.
    2. Johannes Quasten, 1953. Patrology: the Anti-Nicene literature after Irenaeus. Westminster, MD: Newman.
    3. Gaston Halsberghe, 1972. The Cult of Sol Invictus.
    4. Hijmans, S, 2003. “Sol Invictus, the winter solstice, and the origins of Christmas”Mouseion Calgary.