Author: Alby Butler

  • Buckler Shield: Everything About the Buckler in History

    Buckler Shield: Everything About the Buckler in History

    Typically made of metal, a buckler shield (German: faustschild; French: boce; Italian: brochiero) is a tiny round shield measuring between 8 and 16 inches (20–40 cm) in diameter. The primary use of this cold weapon was to complement a sword or spear. A buckler supported a handle on its backside. They were single-handed shields that the warrior held in his fist, thus the name “fist shields.”

    Buckler Shield
    Type:Melee weapon
    Origin:European Antiquity
    Utilization:Military and civilian
    Size:12–18 inches (30–45 cm)
    Weight:1.1 to 2.2 lb (0.5–1 kg)

    The use of bucklers on medals throughout classical antiquity indicated public promises made to the gods for the protection of a ruler; such shields were known as votive bucklers and were displayed in public places like temples and shrines. One votive specimen is seen below:

    Origin of the Buckler Shield

    buckler shield dueling
    (Flickr)

    The name comes from the Old French term bocler which means “shield with a boss” and it points to the ancient shield design called shield boss or umbo. It is an iron sphere in the shield’s center that allows more effective deflecting of sword attacks.

    The shield’s design allowed the fist to rest just under the umbo, or at the level of the weapon’s center of gravity, for the best possible balance.

    This central piece (umbo) was so effective that it paved the way for the invention of a new shield: the buckler shield. The rest of the shield was made as small as possible so that its user could swing the shield boss around more easily.

    Both mounted and foot soldiers frequently used the buckler along with the one-handed sword in the 13th and 14th centuries. However, their presumed historical usage period currently ranges from the High Middle Ages (1000–1300 AD) into the Renaissance (14th–17th centuries).

    A 14th--16th centuries buckler shield, Art Institute of Chicago.
    A 14th–16th centuries buckler shield, Art Institute of Chicago, public domain.

    The buckler gradually became less useful as other forms of weaponry improved, although it was nevertheless often shown in combat scenes alongside the rapier, sword, dagger, and knife until the 17th century. Its modest weight and compact size made it the weapon of choice among civilians.

    History of the Buckler Shield

    The Arabs were the first people to start using fist shields. Shields worn by the Arab cavalry were originally 24 inches (60 cm) in diameter but were eventually trimmed down.

    The buckler shields first appeared in Europe around 1100 AD, and the Byzantines (the Eastern Romans) popularized them in the 13th century, after which they spread throughout the continent. Before that, the shield boss design was already used on Roman shields.

    Both the Celts and the Franks reportedly used this small shield. The shield was widely used in Western Europe throughout the 12th and 13th centuries. This era includes the first documented use of the term in French literature.

    The bucklers were quite common in mid-13th-century Iceland during the Age of the Sturlungs. The same shield spread to Germany and England in the 14th century. It was most widely used by Italy and Spain throughout the 15th and 16th centuries.

    Counter-attacking with the buckler shield against the mordhau technique.
    Counter-attacking with the buckler shield against the mordhau technique. (Flickr)

    They were traditionally employed by Scottish highlanders and were even present at the Battle of Culloden in 1746, when they were mostly utilized by officers.

    The oldest of the manuscripts from the 13th to mid-14th centuries on the art of sword fighting describes the “sword and buckler” approach. This specific manuscript is Royal Armouries Ms. I.33 and it was written around 1300 in Latin in the Holy Roman Empire which corresponds to Franconia in southern Germany.

    The manuscript only contains fighting techniques with a one-handed sword and buckler and thus represents the most comprehensive single source on dealing with this shield. It is the earliest known surviving European combat manual and is currently stored in the Royal Armouries at Leeds, United Kingdom.

    Widely Used Throughout Europe

    The information in this book suggests that buckler combat was widely practiced throughout Europe at the time. The Italian style of fencing, which also included the buckler combat method, acquired significant clout among the elite in the 16th century.

    The Bolognese fencing treatises by Antonio Manciolino and Achille Marozzo at the start of the 16th century in Italy discuss the use of these shields. According to them, it was one of the most “fashionable” weapons of the Renaissance period in Italy.

    In this period, the buckler shield was in vogue. The young men and women of that era wore it on their sword belts and took it wherever they went. The shield could be slung over the shoulder or hung from a belt, or it could be attached to the hilt of the sword.

    At the end of the 16th century, the shield was no longer used by the Venetian fencing school. They armed their left arm with a parrying dagger instead of this shield. The use of the sword and buckler tactic was discontinued after this time.

    The buckler was the weapon of choice for bowmen, crossbowmen, and pikemen. This little shield worn at the waist did not restrict mobility, and it performed a respectable job of protecting the hand that parried the opponent’s sword during hand-to-hand combat.

    A Wide Range of Shapes and Constructions

    Material

    The buckler shields were made of a wide variety of materials. They often included wooden canvas with metal reinforcements like iron strips of varying widths and a metal or shield boss set in the center. Their boards were similar in thickness to the Scandinavian shields, at about 0.24–0.32 inches (6–8 mm).

    Both the wood and the metal used in this shield benefited from being painted or tinned. Brass rivets were often used as fasteners.

    In other versions, the whole shield was made up of a single metal plate or many metal pieces. Because of its diminutive size, a buckler could be manufactured entirely of metal (unlike large shields).

    There were also versions where the shield’s base was made of leather, and it was outfitted with several metal pieces. They were occasionally used in fencing schools.

    Shape

    The majority of buckler shields were round, although the German author Hans Talhoffer’s (1420–1490) fencing book, as well as miniatures and bas-reliefs, often show a broad range of shapes. Because these shields varied in size and shape and were not uniform.

    A rare variant with a very large shield boss and curled-up edges can be seen (above) in the fencing manuals of Hans Talhoffer.

    There were rectangular, trapezoid, oval, or teardrop-shaped bucklers. Their cross sections varied from flat, concave, convex, and wavelike. However, there were two primary designs during the Middle Ages:

    • The first main design was a round shield with the handle positioned directly behind the central boss. These shields came in various shapes, sizes, and thicknesses. Some featured protective protrusions at the top and bottom or serrated edges, as described in Hans Talhoffer’s fencing manual, while others had closed rings, as seen in a replica from the Wallace Collection.
    • The second main design was a rectangular shield with dents or corrugations, as suggested by Achille Marozzo in his work Opera Nova.

    Size

    Herbert Schmidt claims that the buckler could extend to a maximum of 18 inches (45 cm) in size. Today, the shield is reconstructed as part of historical European martial arts. Modern reconstructions often peak in the center at a height of 12–14 inches (30–35 cm).

    Several contemporary fencing groups have recreated the art of sword and buckler combat. Since medieval fencing manuals were sometimes written more as a memory aid for the author than as a pedagogical work, their interpretation is not always apparent.

    How Useful Was the Buckler Shield?

    The buckler was typically employed in three primary ways:

    1. Hand Protection: It was utilized to safeguard the armed hand, ensuring it was covered and shielded as frequently as possible during combat.
    2. Deflection: One of the key functions of the buckler was to deflect incoming blows from adversaries. It serves as a defensive tool, redirecting attacks away from the wielder.
    3. Counterattack: Following a successful parry, the buckler can be effectively used to strike the opponent. It becomes a versatile offensive weapon, allowing the wielder to deliver impactful hits in response to an opponent’s attack.

    Many historical records show that they were more often used than other shields by both the upper and lower classes and by military forces. In Spain, the use of a sword and buckler together was common. When it came to foot combat, it was highly popular in both Germany and England.

    Although it was a defensive weapon in its own right, this shield had many offensive uses as well. As seen in several pieces of fencing literature and combat drawings, it was also an extremely powerful counterattacking weapon.

    The buckler shield acted as both a passive defense and a secondary weapon against attackers. Because of its lightweight and rounded design, it was simple to use. It could be used to deflect an attack and then immediately counter it, due to its strength and sharp edges.

    The End of the Buckler Shields

    Due to the increased use of pikes, spontoons, halberds, ahlspiessen, and crossbows by infantry in the late Middle Ages (1300–1500 AD), the shields were no longer used as frequently as before. In fact, not all 16th-century fighters wore heavy armor either, which lowered their chances of survival.

    It took tremendous finesse to block an arrow with a buckler shield. Therefore, it provided poor protection against projectiles and throwing weapons. Weighing roughly 2.2 pounds (1 kg), it wouldn’t have been enough to stop the strikes of a polearm or flamberge either.

    However, the buckler’s use in warfare against one-handed weapons, the primary weapon of medieval infantry, was incontestable. Any pikeman could easily carry a short, edged weapon with him, but carrying his buckler behind his back would still provide a significant advantage on the battlefield.

    In Culture

    • A popular video game called Elden Ring (2022) features a detailed model of this shield with a description “Best suited for those prepared to take the risk to reap their reward.

    The Buckler Shield at a Glance

    What is the origin of the buckler shield?

    The buckler shield originated in Europe around 1100 AD, with the Byzantines popularizing its use in the 13th century. Its central boss, which made it effective at deflecting sword attacks, was a design cue from Roman shield bosses. The name comes from the Old French term “bocler,” meaning “shield with a boss.”

    How was the buckler shield used in combat?

    This shield served multiple purposes in combat. Firstly, it provided hand protection, ensuring the armed hand was covered and shielded during combat. Additionally, it acted as a defensive tool by deflecting incoming blows from adversaries and redirecting attacks away from the wielder. Lastly, it could be used for counterattacks, allowing the wielder to strike the opponent following a successful parry. Its lightweight and rounded design made it easy to maneuver and deliver impactful hits.

    What were the main designs and sizes of buckler shields?

    Buckler shields exhibited various designs and sizes. The majority were round, with the handle positioned directly behind the central boss. However, rectangular, trapezoid, oval, and teardrop-shaped ones also existed. The shields could have flat, concave, convex, or wavelike cross sections. In terms of size, they could range from a maximum of 18 inches (45 cm) in diameter, although modern reconstructions often peak at a height of 12-14 inches (30-35 cm).

    When did the use of buckler shields decline?

    The use of buckler shields declined in the late Middle Ages (1300-1500 AD) due to the increased use of other weapons such as pikes, halberds, and crossbows by infantry. Its effectiveness against projectiles and throwing weapons was limited, and it offered less protection against polearms. However, they remained popular in foot combat in Germany and England.

    References

    1. I.33 collection – Royal Armouries
    2. Buckler | Etymology, origin and meaning of buckler by Etymonline
    3. A Catalogue of European Bucklers by Herbert Schmidt – Amazon Books
    4. Medieval Swordsmanship: Illustrated Methods And Techniques by John Clements, 1998 – Goodreads
  • Heater Shield: The Story of a Legendary Shield Design

    Heater Shield: The Story of a Legendary Shield Design

    The heater shield, known for its triangular shape that tapers towards the bottom, holds great significance as the pioneering shield design during the era of living heraldry in the Middle Ages. Referred to as “scutum triangulare” in Latin, “écu triangulaire” in French, “Dreieckschild” in German, and “gotický štít” in Slovak, this cold weapon exemplified the beginning of a new chapter in the art of shields as it often symbolized the spirit of creativity. The first heater shield came together in the 12th and 13th centuries.

    The Heater Shield’s History and Origin

    Coat of arms of Berlin includes a heater shield
    Coat of arms of Berlin includes a heater shield.

    The heater shield was first designed during the turn of the 12th and 13th centuries. The shield gets its name because of its resemblance to a clothes iron. Later variations included curvier edges.

    It was both a combat shield of military and heraldic significance. Apart from the Low Countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg), the heater shield was the prevailing shield style employed throughout Western Europe.

    heater shield shape

    Historically, this shield appeared almost exclusively in the heraldry of ancient aristocratic houses. Other aristocratic households then adopted it, and occasionally ordinary people did as well.

    Before the heater shield, the round shield stood as the oldest heraldic shield form. Next came the kite shield or almond-shaped shield, which can be seen on the seals of the Counts of Arnsberg between the years 1200 and 1300.

    But this shield was most commonly associated with the seals of high priests and churches between the years 1140 and 1300 (as seen below), as well as the seals of aristocratic ladies during this time.

    The kite shield of sleeping soldiers at Temple Pyx, c. 1125-50 AD.
    The kite shield of sleeping soldiers at Temple Pyx, c. 1125-50 AD. (Image by Deacon of Pndapetzim, CC BY-SA 2.5 / enhanced from original)

    In the 12th century, two distinct shield designs stood out the most compared to others: the heart-shaped shield and the almond-shaped kite shield. At the end of the 12th century in France, these two designs evolved into a large heater shield with rounded corners.

    Until that point, the Norman kite shield had retained some features from its pre-heraldic era origins. This type of shield was used, for example, by Henry III, Count of Brabant (1086), Godfrey I, Duke of Brabant (1110–1151), Philip and Theodoric, Counts of Flanders (1161), Theodoric, Count of Holland (1190–1201), Philip, Count of Namur (1206), Henry, Count of Lotharingia (1220), Theodoric, Lord of Malberg (1233), and many other nobles and dynasties.

    The Rise of the Heater Shield

    The heart-shaped shield was one of the oldest heraldic shields and it can be found on the seal of Robert de Chartres (1193), a French noble. This form was in use until the first quarter of the 13th century, as seen on the seal of Raoul de Gif in 1228 when the elongated form of this shield also appeared.

    However, by the 13th or 14th century, the heater shields had superseded it as the preferred design. Henry I, Duke of Lorraine (1195), William, Count of Holland (1213), Henry, Duke of Lorraine (1241), and Henry, Lord of Reifferscheid (1254) were the first to employ heater shields with recurved sides. They became known as the Manesse form (see the below image).

    Other people around the same time also used straight-sided heater shields, such as Theodoric, Count of Holland (1199), and Albert of Habsburg (1206).

    Combat of Roland and the giant Ferragut showcases a heater shield.
    Combat of Roland and the giant Ferragut showcases a heater shield. A miniature from Grandes Chroniques de France, c. 1375-1380.

    The size of heater shields began shrinking dramatically in the middle of the 13th century, and this trend accelerated after the middle of the century.

    The upper portion of these shields tended to have relatively straight sides, but by the second half of the 13th century, it was not uncommon to find heater shields with concave edges, giving rise to the “classic” heater shield design.

    This form of shield was used by William, Count of Holland (1205), Florian IV, Count of the Netherlands (1232), Henry, Duke of Lorraine and Brabant (1241–1253), Baldwin, Count of Bentheim (1246), Rausseman von Kempenich (1251), Gerard, Lord of Wildenberg (1267), Godfrey of Brabant (1284), Gérard, Lord of Voorne.

    The Oldest Coat of Arms on a Shield

    Thus, the enormous Norman kite shield was shortened to form the modern heater shield. Its straight top edge contrasted with its somewhat rounded edges.

    The earliest heraldic examples of this shield appear on Gothic shields. Thus, the oldest coat of arms on a shield in history is actually the heater shield, which has a length-to-width ratio of 8:7.

    According to the Oxford Guide to Heraldry (2001), it is an azure shield with four gold lions rampant, which King Henry I of England is rumored to have given to his son-in-law, Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou, in 1127 AD.

    Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou, with a heater shield that looks like a kite shield.
    Geoffrey Plantagenet, Count of Anjou, with a heater shield that looks like a kite shield.

    His shield supports a shield boss, and it looks like a kite shield at first. But it has a straight top edge and a triangular body rather than an oval top edge and oval body design.

    The Heater Shield Got Smaller and Smaller

    During the 12th century and the first two-thirds of the 13th century, heater shields continued to be enormous in size, measuring roughly half a man’s height. As a result, it was worn over one shoulder with a strap and encircled half of the wearer’s body.

    heater shield

    They were only half as tall as men until the end of the 13th century, and just a third as tall until the middle of the 14th. Beginning in the second part of the 13th century and continuing throughout the 14th century, it shrank and gradually took on the form of an almost isosceles triangle with slightly curved outward edges. As the 14th century came to a close, the heater shield was no longer used in battle.

    Beginning in the early 13th century, as shown on the shields in the Codex Manesse (c. 1304), a variant of the heater shield appeared with sharply rounded sides. Compared to the heater shields used in the middle of the 13th century, this variant was tiny.

    The heater shield, along with variants with rounded sides, is still a widely used design today in both military and popular culture. Although heater shields became less common in the 14th century, they still occasionally appeared on seals and gravestones at the start of the 15th century. Some heater shields even had spikes on them.

    References

    1. Living Heraldry: The Ancient Art and Its Modern Applications – Stephen Slater, 2004 – Google Books
    2. The Oxford Guide to Heraldry – Thomas Woodcock, John Martin Robinson, 2001 – Google Books
  • Shield Boss: A Small Piece of Metal That Changed Battles

    Shield Boss: A Small Piece of Metal That Changed Battles

    The shield boss, also known as the umbo, is a hemispherical or conical metal lining positioned at the center of certain shield variants—such as the parma shield of the ancient Romans. The shield boss, usually made of metal, was developed to reinforce the wooden boards used in traditional shield construction. In this cold weapon, the word “umbo” comes from the Latin word for “protrusion” or “bulge” (umbo, gen. umbonis).

    The Shield Boss’ Purpose

    Buckler Shield
    An ornamental, probably votive, buckler shield of the Late Middle Ages.

    The shield boss (or just “boss”), often metal (bronze and iron) and rarely wooden, was intended to strengthen the construction of ancient shields, which were mostly made of wood. Its second purpose was to deflect the attack of an edged weapon.

    It also served as a means of safeguarding the hand against sword or spear thrusts, while also enabling offensive maneuvers by striking the enemy’s face or abdomen with the shield.

    The grip and the boss of a shield were of the utmost importance to Viking shields.

    It was punched into the mandrel from a metal sheet that was only 0.08–0.1 inches (2–2.5 mm) thick. It began as a flat, relatively thin sheet, which was obtained by melting the metal into a container, and which could then be smoothed and polished.

    History and Origin

    soldiers with spears and shields with shield bosses (umbos)

    The first shield bosses were invented in the Bronze Age (2,000–700 BC) and they were widely used from the Bronze Age to the late Middle Ages, serving as an upgraded and dependable alternative to basic wooden shields.

    The earliest examples of shield bosses are already known from discoveries within Latin culture, dating back to the beginning of the Iron Age (1200–550 BC). These shields were used by various groups, including Germans, Celts, and Romans.

    This enormous ancient umbo (3rd–2nd centuries BC) has the potential to complement either a Roman "scutum" (oval shield) or a big round shield.
    This enormous ancient umbo (3rd–2nd centuries BC) has the potential to complement either a Roman “scutum” (oval shield) or a big round shield. (Photo by Jerónimo Roure Pérez, CC-BY-SA 4.0).

    In the Middle Ages, they reappeared as a component of bucklers, where they were riveted onto them. In archaeological studies, the shield bosses are often studied alongside the fibula (brooch) to help determine the dating of funerary artifacts from the pre-Roman era, the period of Roman influence, and the migrations of different peoples.

    As curved shields (like the Roman scutum) and leather straps became more widespread, the shield boss became more of an aesthetic thing. In Denmark, several shield bulges from both the Iron Age and the Viking Age (793–1066 AD) have been discovered.

    Significance of the Umbo

    The umbo or shield boss was utilized in ancient Greece, where it adorned the shields of the Hoplite infantry. This feature was later embraced by the Roman legions, who employed it to create openings for sword or gladius attacks during close combat. During the Roman Empire (31 BC – AD 476) the term “shield boss” referred to the entirety of a shield.

    shield boss

    The way the shield was held, with the fist gripping the handle in the center, had a significant impact on battle tactics. It allowed for not only active defense against incoming attacks, but also offensive maneuvers (to deflect the attacks with the umbo).

    Additionally, when forming infantry formations, the shields with umbo were tightly aligned to create a solid wall, enabling effective line formations. As cavalry warfare evolved and grew in prominence, a secondary strap was introduced, allowing the shields with umbos to be hung on the forearm for added convenience.

    Just beneath the handle, a spherical hole was cut into the shield, and the opening was sealed with a shield boss on the exterior. As a result, a depression was carved out in the middle of the shield’s inner surface, just where the user’s hand would naturally rest.

    Oftentimes, the exterior side of the shield boss would be minted or engraved with various forms and signs—such as the owner’s symbol—while the inner side would include identifying data—name, component number, etc.—.

    But these were not the only purposes of a shield boss: Ancient Roman legionaries carried their purses in the shield boss of their iconic red scutum shields.

    Function of the Shield Boss

    The shield boss of a Roman Scutum
    The shield boss of a Roman Scutum. (By MatthiasKabel, CC BY)

    The shield boss’ hemispherical or cone-shaped design considerably weakened the strength of an opponent’s strikes.

    Since most of the strikes were directed at the spot in the middle of the shield, the powerful shield boss absorbed the blows and redirected them off of their intended paths. This design piece was therefore only useful for combat on circular and oval shields.

    The umbo was a protective protrusion present on almost all oval shields.

    The size and strength of the heater shields and the kite shields allowed them to be moved across the body to deflect strikes. The shield boss did not serve its purpose with these particular shield types. Because a round shield was directed towards the attack for deflection, which made the shield boss much more useful.

    The kite shield of the sleeping soldiers of the Temple Pyx with shield bosses. A mid-12th-century medieval bronze gilt plaque.
    The kite shield of the sleeping soldiers of the Temple Pyx with shield bosses. A mid-12th-century medieval bronze gilt plaque. (Source: TemplePyx, CC BY-SA 2.5. This image has been enhanced from original by Malevus.com)

    Numerous historians also posit that the conical shape of the shield boss played a significant role in enhancing its efficacy as a striking weapon in close-quarters combat, effectively catching adversaries off guard with its element of surprise. It also protected the center of the shield, where the shield’s handle and the user’s hand are located.

    The Small Shields Instead of the Large Ones

    A Lombard shield boss from the Civic Archaeological Museum, Italy.
    A Lombard shield boss from the Civic Archaeological Museum, Italy. (Photo by Giorces, Attribution 2.5 Generic / enhanced from original).

    The shield bulge was more often seen on round shields of a smaller or medium size than on larger ones. Although there were still some large shields with a protective bulge because of their difference in grip.

    In small shields, the grip was located in the middle of the shield, and it was used in the same way as a punch; it was swung in front of the user to deflect blows.

    Another use for the shield protrusion was to damage the blade of the sword. Whether the shield was composed of wood or metal, the bulge was almost always constructed from metal. The pointed blade tips were relatively thin and brittle. Repeatedly slamming the blade into the massive protective bulge could have eroded the blade and rendered it inoperable during battle.

    When it came to large shields, holding them with just one grip was uncomfortable. That’s why it was common to have two grip straps: one positioned near the elbow and the other near the edge of the shield. When lifting a shield of this size, it was typically done in a circular motion. The effectiveness of the shield boss diminished with this rotational lifting.

    End of the Shield Boss

    Iberian shield umbo.
    Iberian shield umbo. (Photo by Jerónimo Roure Pérez, CC-BY-SA 4.0).

    After the introduction of the so-called “Norman shield” in the 11th century, which had a different grip technique, the shield boss was only decoration, and disappeared in the course of the High Middle Ages (1000–1300 AD).

    The shapes of the shield bosses differed greatly depending on the fashion and region. There were spherical, hemispherical, conical and pointed ones, which could be richly decorated or gilded on ceremonial shields.

    Invented in the Bronze Age (2,000–700 BC), the shield boss was relegated to purely aesthetic purposes throughout the Middle Ages (500 to 1400–1500 AD). There were two reasons behind this shift:

    1. The curved shape of the newer shields made them more effective at deflecting blows by scattering the strikes throughout the body.
    2. The hand straps (enarmes), rather than a bar grip, eliminated the need for the inner side of the shield to be deep enough to accommodate the hand.

    These two modifications did away with the necessity for a shield boss.

    The Shield Boss at a Glance

    What is the purpose of the shield boss?

    The shield boss, also known as the umbo, served two main purposes. Firstly, it was designed to strengthen ancient wooden shields by reinforcing them with a hemispherical or conical metal lining. Secondly, it acted as a defense mechanism, deflecting attacks from edged weapons and protecting the warrior’s hand from blows that penetrated the shield.

    How did the shield boss contribute to battle tactics?

    The shield boss played a significant role in battle tactics. It was used in ancient Greece by the Hoplite infantry and later adopted by Roman legions. By gripping the shield’s handle in the center and using the boss, warriors could actively defend against incoming attacks and even execute offensive maneuvers by deflecting attacks with the umbo. It also facilitated the formation of tightly aligned shield walls, creating effective line formations.

    What was the significance of the shield boss in different shield types?

    It was primarily effective on circular and oval shields, as its design absorbed and redirected strikes away from the shield’s center. The hemispherical or conical shape considerably weakened the strength of an opponent’s strikes. This design piece was commonly found on smaller or medium-sized round shields, where the grip was located in the middle. In larger shields, two grip straps were used, reducing the shield boss’s effectiveness.

    Why did the use of shield bosses decline in the Middle Ages?

    The introduction of newer shield designs and grip techniques, such as the Norman shield and hand straps, led to the decline of shield bosses during the High Middle Ages. The curved shape of the newer shields allowed for better deflection of blows, and the use of hand straps eliminated the need for deep inner sides of shields to accommodate the hand. These modifications rendered the shield boss unnecessary, relegating it to a purely decorative feature.

    References

    1. Featured Image: Einsamer Schütze, This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. / Rotated and edited from original.
    2. Roman Shields by M.C. Bishop, 2020 – Bishop Osprey Publishing
    3. Rome and the Sword: How Warriors and Weapons Shaped Roman History by Simon James, 2011 – Amazon Books
    4. Ancient Roman War and Weapons (People in the Past: Rome) by Brian Williams – 2002 – Amazon Books
  • Parma Shield: The Iconic Disk Shield of the Romans

    Parma Shield: The Iconic Disk Shield of the Romans

    The Parma shield was a round Roman shield used by Roman soldiers from the 1st to the 8th century AD. During the twilight of the Roman Empire, particularly from the 3rd century onward, this disk-shaped, wooden parma shield gained considerable prominence and widespread usage among other cold weapons. The shield resembled the Greek aspis and it held a rich historical legacy in the realm of Roman military tactics.

    Parma
    Type:Shield
    Origin:Ancient Rome
    UtilizationInfantry, Cavalry
    Diameter:35 to 36″ (90–91 cm).
    Weight:5.7 lb (2.6 kg)

    The smaller size of the parma shield was called “parmula”.

    Origins of the Parma Shield

    An ornamental parma shield similar to those carried by Velites.
    An ornamental parma shield similar to those carried by Velites.

    In the Woodwardian Museum, there was a votive parma (above) that was etched and gold-plated. On it, there is a possible depiction of Brennus’s 387 BC siege of Rome and Marco F. Camilo’s recapture of it, as well as a hump with a monstrous face with ram’s horns, greenery, and a twisted beard. It was most likely created during Claudius’ (r. 41–54) or Nero’s (r. 54–68) reign.

    The Romans developed the parma shield for use by their cavalry and the auxilia (non-citizen troops) in the 1st century AD. Like many other things borrowed from ancient Greece, this shield was eventually a Roman version of the Greek aspis.

    Roman infantrymen frequently used the Parma shield because of its effectiveness in deflecting arrows.

    A veles in battle, protected by a palma shield. (Image: 1981, A History of the Art of War Among the Carthaginians and Romans Down to the Battle of Pydna, 168 BC by Theodore Ayrault Dodge.
    A veles in battle, protected by a palma shield. (Image by Redtony and Serenthia / CC BY 4.0 / rotated from original).

    Certain signiferi (standard bearers) and even some centurions used it in the legions of the Roman Army. Some signiferi and gladiators used a smaller, spherical shield with the same name. The Thraex gladiators also utilized a shield called a parma or parmula (a variant with a smaller size).

    Virgil’s Aeneid (a Latin epic poem) mentions the parma as a distinctive weapon employed by the Teucrians in their defense against the Greeks during the Battle of Troy (Trojan War), and subsequently against the Rutulians (an ancient people in Italy).

    He associates the shield with the clypeus (another shield) of the Palladium (a wooden statue of Minerva or Athena) because, being small, the statue was also in proportion.

    A Plain but Smart Design

    End of the third century Roman soldier with a parma shield during a show.
    End of the third century Roman soldier with a parma shield during a show. (Image: Medium69, CC BY-SA 3.0 / rotated from original)

    While the legions commonly adorned their parma shields in a vibrant shade of red, the auxiliaries favored a blue-colored version of the same shield. This defensive equipment usually had an elliptical shape with a diameter of around 35 to 36 inches (90–91 cm).

    The shield’s iron framework made it a formidable device. In addition to its usefulness in deflecting blows from the center of the shield, the umbo (the bulging shield base, or “shield boss”) served as a mounting point for the shield’s handle.

    While it was mostly described as a round shield, there were bigger, oval variants, and they were named “clipeus“. Even though the clipeus shield was first used in Roman warfare after the 3rd century, both names are often used interchangeably in history, causing a bit of confusion.

    History of the Parma Shield

    Equites gladiators with round shields or parma shields.
    Equites gladiators with round shields or parma shields. (Photo by Carole Raddato, CC BY-SA 2.0 / cropped and enhanced from original)

    In the early republican era of Rome (509 BC–27 BC), the parma was used by legionnaires, namely the lowest class division of the army, the infantry velites. A parma, javelin, sword, and helmet (made of wolf skin for display of valor) were their standard issue gear.

    The velites were stationed up front in part for strategic reasons and in part so that they might earn personal glory in one-on-one battles. The Velites were the legion’s youngest and least well-off troops.

    “These are not given to a soldier if in the formed array… but to those who in the skirmishing or in similar circumstances in which there is no need to engage in single combat, have voluntarily and by choice placed themselves in danger.”

    Polybius

    The full-length scutum shield eventually took the place of the parma after Gaius Marius eliminated velites during the Marian reforms (107 BC).

    Lighter and better suited for the cavalry and signiferi, the parma shield was only issued to the auxilia for them to use in case of mutiny.

    However, with the scutum shield and improved gear, legionnaires would have a higher chance of winning a mutiny. Legions used the parma shield again after the scutum left the army in the 3rd century.

    Pyrrhic dance with parma shields
    Pyrrhic dance with parma shields. By Sir Lawrence Alma-Tadema, O.M., R.A. (1905). (Source: Public Domain)

    Parma was used in the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire until around the 8th century, when scutum shields took their place once again.

    The shield was raised above the head and hit with a sword to make a resounding ring in the Pyrrhic dance, originally an ancient Greek warrior dance.

    The Pattern on the Shield

    a soldier with parma shield
    The Christogram emblem Chi-Rho or ☧.

    The Christogram emblem Chi-Rho (, from the initials of the Greek word ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ, “chrismon”) was the most prevalent pattern on the shield in the late Roman and early Byzantine eras.

    Roman Emperor Constantine I (r. 306–337 AD) used the Chi-Rho sign on a vexillum, or military flag.

    The Byzantine army’s attacking force consisted of infantry mounted on horses and foot soldiers armed with circular shields (σκουτάτοι, skutatoi).

    They were heavy infantrymen from the Eastern Roman Empire, equipped with spathae and spears. The Latin word scutum is where the term “skutatoi” (“the shied bearers”) originates.

    Some soldiers are seen with the shield at 0:59, which is also known as the clipeus.

    The Parma Shield at a Glance

    What is the Parma shield?

    The Parma shield was a round Roman shield that was widely used by Roman soldiers from the 1st to the 8th century AD. It resembled the Greek aspis and played a significant role in Roman military tactics.

    What were the dimensions and weight of the Parma shield?

    The Parma shield had an elliptical shape with a diameter of approximately 35 to 36 inches (90–91 cm). It weighed around 5.7 lb (2.6 kg), making it a relatively lightweight shield.

    Who used the Parma shield in the Roman Army?

    Both infantry and cavalry units in the Roman Army used the shield. Certain signiferi (standard bearers) and centurions also used it. Gladiators, particularly the Thraex gladiators, also used a smaller version of the shield.

    What was the significance of the Christogram emblem on the shield?

    The most prevalent pattern found on this shield during the late Roman and early Byzantine eras was the Christogram emblem Chi-Rho (☧), representing the Greek word ΧΡΙΣΤΟΣ (“chrismon”). This emblem held religious significance and was associated with Emperor Constantine I. It was commonly seen on military flags and shields during that period.

    References

  • Tetsubo: An Ancient Metal Club, Too Heavy to Wield

    Tetsubo: An Ancient Metal Club, Too Heavy to Wield

    Tetsubō or tetsubo (鉄棒, “iron stick”) is a club-style Japanese cold weapon. It is known for its durability and reliability. In essence, it is a heavy and powerful club, often forged from iron or steel. The striking part (the head) of the weapon constituted half of its length, and it was often completely made of metal and equipped with metal spikes. In contrast, the kanabo (金棒, “metal stick”), a similar weapon, was mainly a wooden weapon with metal studs. Due to its heavy weight, a tetsubo provides immense crushing power.

    “Tetsu” means “iron,” and “bo” means “stick.”

    Tetsubo
    Type:Club
    Origin:Japanese
    UtilizationInfantry, Mythological
    Length:Total: 83–118″ (2.1–3 m), head: 24–35″ (60–90 cm)
    Weight:11–20 lb (5–9 kg)

    Tetsubo’s Design

    A steel tetsubo.
    A steel example. (Image by Todd Gdula, from KoboldPress)

    Tetsubo is characterized by its length, which typically ranges from 80 to 120 inches (2 to 3 m), with a spiked head measuring between 25 and 35 inches (60 to 90 cm). This edged weapon usually weighed five times as much as a baseball bat, around 11 lb (5 kg), and was three times its length.

    This heavy melee weapon possesses a distinctive shape reminiscent of a bat, featuring a substantial end and a gradually narrowing handle adorned with a pommel. Alternatively, it can maintain a straight body extending from the handle to the tip.

    The shaft’s cross-sectional profile offers two possibilities: a circular shape or a polygonal structure composed of parallel surfaces symmetrically encircling the axis. A tetsubo could be coated with iron, copper, silver, or even gold if the user could afford it. The weapon was rather popular in the Sengoku period (1467–1615).

    A tetsubo which is originally labelled as a "kanabo" by the museum. It looks more like a tetsubo with its ring handle and metal body material.
    A tetsubo which is originally labelled as a “kanabo” by the museum. It looks more like a tetsubo with its ring handle and metal body material.

    Tetsubo vs. Kanabo

    Although tetsubo seems like kanabo, kanabo’s bludgeoning part that deals damage is not ironed with metal. However, the distinction between this ancient club and kanabo is often unclear due to a lack of definitive historical sources concerning the former. Thus, the two weapons are frequently confused.

    Due to its iron composition, a tetsubo was typically quite heavy, which resulted in its infrequent usage among soldiers.

    kanabo weapon
    (3D kanabo model by Oskar “K1TT3N” Adamczyk, CC BY 4.0 / enhanced from original)

    For comparison, most kanabos weighed from 4.5 to 11 pounds (2 to 5 kg), but according to some sources, this Japanese war club weighed as much as 11 to 20 lb (5–9 kg).

    The tetsubo exhibits similarities to the kanabo, yet it possesses the distinct characteristic of being predominantly composed of steel or iron rather than wood. The dimensions of these weapons encompass a wide range, often featuring a smaller and more manageable size designed for one-handed use.

    Use of the Tetsubo

    Religion

    A-giant-oni-statue-with-a-tetsubo-sits-on-top-of-a-building
    A giant oni statue with a tetsubo, sits on top of a building. Photo by JolieBlanc, CC BY 3.0 / Cropped from original.

    This heavy club is also more often mentioned in mythological texts. The Japanese believed that the brutal demons “oni” preferred them because of their immense size and strength made them feel at home while wielding the weapon.

    They utilized this metal club against everything that stood in their way. Oni were lawbreakers. Indeed, in Japan, there is a saying that goes “giving a tetsubo [or kanabo] to an oni,” which signifies granting an advantage to someone who is already formidable from the beginning.

    Samurai

    On the other hand, samurai often engaged in battle with peasants who opposed their daimyo (the local ruler), and they also faced off against ninjas.

    When the samurai had to choose between utilizing their pricey katanas, yaris, or naginatas and the cheap, unbreakable, and easy-to-replace tetsubo, they generally opted for the latter. Many villagers met their untimely end at the crushing hands of this iron club.

    Monks

    Among the medieval Buddhist monk soldiers sohei (“monk soldiers”) and yamabushi (Japanese mountain ascetic hermits), the tetsubo was one of the most preferred weapons.

    Military

    In battle, a tetsubo was used to crush the legs of opposing horses and defeat armored foes. Because the inertia of this heavy weapon would knock its user off balance if s/he missed a strike, mastering this armor-piercing club (also known as tetsubo-jutsu) required both considerable strength and skill.

    Various Types of Tetsubo

    Small Japanese tetsubo, an iron club with a leather grip.
    Small Japanese tetsubo, an iron club with a leather grip. Image: Samuraiantiqueworld, CC BY-SA 3.0.

    There was a wide range of sizes and styles of tetsubo, with the biggest being two-handed and as tall as a human, and the smallest often being one-handed and no longer than a forearm.

    The nyoibo, konsaibo, kanabo, and ararebo are all similar clubs. Samurai in feudal Japan utilized the konsaibo. The same samurai also utilized the ararebo, a form of spiked or studded two-handed variant.

    On the other hand, the kanemuchi (or kanamuchi) and the aribo (a.k.a. kirikobo or gojo) are both solid iron weapons that lack any studs or spikes. These stick weapons were common in medieval Japan.

    A common shape that they assumed was that of a simple metal rod. Some kanemuchi reached 39 inches (1 m) in length and were made from a single piece of iron.

    Tetsubo at a Glance

    What is the design and composition of a Tetsubo?

    It is a club-style Japanese cold weapon known for its durability and reliability. It is a heavy and powerful club typically made of iron or steel. Like the rest of the weapon, the striking part of the weapon is completely made of metal and equipped with metal spikes.

    How does Tetsubo differ from Kanabo?

    While Tetsubo and Kanabo are similar weapons, there are distinct differences between them. Kanabo is mainly a wooden weapon with metal studs, while the other is predominantly composed of steel or iron. The weapon’s heavy weight provides immense crushing power compared to the relatively lighter Kanabo.

    What were the common uses of Tetsubo?

    The weapon found usage among various groups. Samurai often chose to wield this iron or steel club in battle due to its affordability, durability, and ease of replacement. Japanese mountain ascetic hermits and medieval Buddhist monk soldiers both favored it. In battle, it was employed to crush the legs of opposing horses and defeat armored foes.

    What are the different types of Tetsubo?

    This club came in various sizes and styles. The biggest variants were two-handed and as tall as a human, while the smallest were one-handed and forearm-length. Some notable types include nyoibo, konsaibo, kanabo, ararebo, kanemuchi, and aribo. These variations had different features such as spikes, studs, or solid iron construction.

    References

    1. Featured Image: Photo by JolieBlanc, CC BY 3.0 / Cropped from original.
    2. Kogan, Daniel, and Sun-Jin Kim, 1996. Tuttle Dictionary Of The Martial Arts Of Korea, China & Japan. AbeBooks.
    3. Serge Mol, 2003. Classical Weaponry of Japan: Special Weapons and Tactics of the Martial Arts. Google Books.
    4. Don Cunningham, 2012. Samurai Weapons: Tools of the Warrior. Tuttle Publishing.
  • Bo Staff: Martial Arts Weapon of a Legendary Style

    Bo Staff: Martial Arts Weapon of a Legendary Style

    The bo staff (Japanese 棒, bō for “staff”), also known as “long stick”, is a striking cold weapon from Okinawa, Japan. It is locally referred to as Kun (Japanese 棍 Kon) in the Okinawa regions of Ryūkyū. The Bō is used in various martial arts disciplines such as Bujinkan, Kobudō, different schools of Koryū, and certain styles of Karate. Bojutsu is the name for the martial art that specifically makes use of the bo staff. The term “con staff” refers to the same style of weapon in Vietnamese martial arts.

    Origin of the Bo Staff

    bo staff

    The Shaolin monks brought the Gùn (Chinese: 棍), a staff used in their style of stick combat, to Japan. In that region, the gùn underwent various changes before becoming known as the bō.

    During this period, weapons were strictly prohibited for anyone who was not a member of the samurai warrior nobility. Since most samurai were often ambushed, they had to perfect a stealthy weapon that could nevertheless do the job. Thus, the bo staff became a traveling walking staff that doubled as a weapon if danger arose.

    The Bo Staff’s Design

    bo staff combat between two people
    (Photo by Scott Feldstein, CC BY 2.0 / Cropped from original)

    The bo staff is often crafted of red or white oak (and rarely of plastic or metal) and is 6 feet (182 cm) in length, with a diameter of 1 to 1.2 in (2.5 to 3 cm). However, modern training necessitates that the size be tailored to the participant. According to that, the bo staff should be longer by two hand widths than the student.

    The Ryukyu Kobudo schools typically utilize a bo staff with a diameter of 1.4 in (3.5 cm), although in Yamanni-ryu, the bo is narrower at the edges. Rattan bo is utilized in kung fu dojos (schools) because it is long-lasting, affordable, and simple to carry.

    kobudo, bo staff

    The bo is often crafted from rattan (a type of palm) in Kung Fu dojos (schools). This is because it is more durable, inexpensive, and easier to carry around. Rattan is solid rather than hollow, unlike bamboo.

    Because of its flexibility, a bo staff is very difficult to break without special equipment or considerable force.

    Fighting Styles and Techniques

    When training with the bo staff, beginners start with basic punching and thrusting moves. Basic techniques of the bo in Kung Fu include spinning the stick by rapidly switching your grip. You spin the bo to generate force, which you then use to strike your opponent in the face, neck, arm, hand, hip, knee, or leg with the bo’s end.

    At full speed, the bo staff can spin at speeds of up to 55 miles (90 km) per hour. The bo can also be used for levering techniques and thrusts.

    Bojutsu and bo staff.
    Bojutsu and bo staff. (Photo by Beatrice Murch, CC BY 2.0)

    Combat drills (kumibo, similar to karate’s kumite) are the first thing you undertake when you reach the upper levels of training with this martial art weapon. At this point, you and your companion will be able to fight more freely.

    In the past, some soldiers utilized the bo staff because it was cheap to produce and effective in combat. It was remarkable to see seasoned combatants dispatch opponents from farther than 80 inches (2 m) away.

    The primary benefit of the extended range was an improvement in effectiveness over shorter melee weapons like swords and other smaller edged weapons.

    a professional person using a full-length bo staff
    (Photo by Scott Feldstein, CC BY 2.0 / Cropped from original)

    Variants of the Bo Staff

    The standard length for a bo staff is 6 feet (182 cm), and this specific length of the bo goes by the name “Rokushaku-Bo” (六尺棒). The name means “six shaku long stick” in Japanese, where one shaku is equal to around one foot (30 cm).

    Another variant is the Yonshaku-Bō (four shaku long stick – 四尺棒) and it is similar in length to the Jo staff. This 4-foot (120 cm)-long variant wasn’t only for stabbing; it could also be used for levering, crushing, or throwing the target.

    The Kushaku-Bo, which was 9 feet or 270 cm (nine shaku – 九尺棒) in length, was formerly widely used in Okinawa but has since fallen out of favor. The large length necessitated frequent hand switching, which meant the staff needed to slip easily between the hands; hence, it was often shaped spherically like most varieties.

    Since this variant was capable of producing such strong centrifugal forces, it was ideal for techniques that included spinning the staff. The red oak used in its construction made the Kushaku-Bo sturdy enough to resist cracking or splitting. However, the length posed a challenge in terms of its legality for ownership, as it was challenging to categorize it solely as a walking staff, especially when samurai wielded it as a covert weapon.

    The Sanshaku-Bo – 三尺棒, is three shaku in length, or around 3 feet (92 cm), making it the equivalent of a Hanbo, one of the shortest martial art staffs. But this short length allows for rapid execution of close combat techniques. This variant of the bo staff was often carried in pairs and frequently had a string attached to the wrist in case it was knocked out of the hand by a heavier weapon.

    The Tanbo (短棒) comes in at an even shorter 2 feet (60 cm). It was quite similar to the hanbo, and it, too, had a wristlet attachment. In order to create a weapon like a nunchaku, two tanbo were often joined together using a chain or other similar device.

    Last but not least, the Shoshaku-Bo should be highlighted. This weapon ranged in length from 1 to 1.5 feet (30 to 44 cm), was only used for melee combat, and needed extensive training to be used successfully against longer weapons.

    The Bajobo or “horse stick,” is the longest known kind of bo staff at 13 shaku (about 13 ft; 390 cm).

    There are more variants of the Bo staff that can be identified by their cross-sectional geometry:

    • Round: Maru-bo – まる棒
    • Square: Kaku-bo – 角棒
    • Hexagonal: Rokkaku-bo – 六角棒
    • Octagonal: Hakkaku-bo – 八角棒

    The bo is constructed from several different materials. For safety and reliability reasons, the variant called Take-bo (竹棒) is only made from recently chopped bamboo since bamboo that hasn’t been freshly cut splinters over time.

    Iron or lightweight and sturdy rattan can also be used in some other variants.

    In Okinawa, there was also a special type of Bō that was often incorporated into children’s daily play, serving as both a sword and, for example, a horse for riding. In this way, the handling of this weapon was practiced from an early age.


    Featured Image: Photo by Edmund Garman, CC BY 2.0 / Cropped from original.

  • Rohatyn: A Slavic Bear Spear of the 12th Century

    Rohatyn: A Slavic Bear Spear of the 12th Century

    The rohatyn was a hefty Slavic spear used in close-quarters warfare and big-game hunting. This cold weapon had a big, double-edged blade, and it was characterized by its long shaft. When it came to hunting bears, a crossguard was attached beneath the rohatyn’s blade, preventing the bear from climbing on the weapon by grabbing onto this part. A Ukrainian town shares the same name as this edged weapon. The above picture features various rohatyn spearheads (the first three) along with a sovnya spear at the bottom.

    Rohatyn
    Type of weapon:Polearm
    Other names:Bear spear, bärenspieß
    Origin:Slavs in Eastern Europe
    UtilizationMainly hunting, less often for military
    Length:Total: 80″ (2 m), blade: 12″ (30 cm)
    Weight:2–3 lbs (1–1.5 kg)

    The Rohatyn Used for Hunting

    Since a rohatyn was meant to cause a broad and deep wound, it was only used on huge and potentially dangerous animals such as brown bears, aurochs, and wild boars. Two hands were used to hold it while striking.

    Rohatyn spear

    A crossguard was often placed underneath the point of the blade to prevent it from entering the wound too deeply, thereby keeping the beast at bay while not allowing the weapon to get stuck inside the animal and paving the way for a quick renewal of the blow.

    Either the pointed end or the whole structure was known as a “rampage” in Russian. In fact, this piece gave birth to the Slavic idiom, “climbing the rampage”.

    The rohatyn’s wooden shaft was roughly as tall as an average man and was constructed to withstand the weight of the attacking beast while the other end of the shaft was planted firmly in the ground thanks to its pointed tip.

    According to the historian Pavel Vinkler, above and below the rohatyn’s blade were two decorative knobs that also served to counterbalance the weapon.

    To make it easier for the warrior to handle the weapon, two or three metal branches were attached to the shaft. And for the wealthy, this part was adorned with golden or silver braid, silk ribbons, belts, and more.

    The maximum length of a rohatyn was five cubits, or about 120 inches (3 m). The spear was often grooved to lighten it, but this rendered it unusable for cuts and limited it to thrusts instead.

    The Rich History of the Hunting Rohatyn

    The rohatyn spear of the Grand Prince Boris of Tver, 1400--1461.
    The rohatyn spear of the Grand Prince Boris of Tver, 1400–1461.

    The exact origins of the rohatyn are uncertain, but this weapon boasts a rich and ancient history. From the Middle Ages to the early 18th century, both cavalry and infantry used this weapon. The people of Ruthenia (Kievan Rus’) and Poland used it often in battle and to hunt enormous games.

    According to one source, Daniel of Galicia, the first King of Ruthenia (Rus’), personally killed three wild boars with the weapon in 1255.

    The most well-known example is Prince Boris of Tver’s weapon, who was the Grand Prince of Tver until 1461. This rohatyn was forged in the first part of the 15th century.

    The images on its ferrule (spear-butt or socket) have been linked to Christian symbolism or to historical events in the life of Boris of Tver, although their precise significance is unclear. The weapon is specifically mentioned in the 1678 Kremlin Armoury:

    The rohatyn is made of red damask, the ferrule is covered with intricately gilded silver — the engravings depict plants, people, and birds; on the edge of the ferrule, there are two lines with the inscription: ‘Rohatyn of Grand Duke Boris Alexandrovich’. The value of the weapon was estimated at 400 rubles

    According to one estimation, 400 rubles in the 1600s would be equal to 2,000,000–3,500,000 USD today.

    Until the turn of the 20th century, bears were still often hunted using rohatyn. Although relatively uncommon, “bear spears” were also present in Western Europe.

    The Battle Rohatyn

    Compared to the hunting species, the battle Rohatyns especially had enormous piercing strength because of their significant weight and could be used to slash or pierce anything, such as plate armor.

    The spear’s steel tip varied greatly in size, and it was often in the form of a laurel leaf.

    The whole length of the blade (including the ferrule or spear-butt) could be anywhere from 8 to 24 inches (20 to 60 cm), with a breadth that could approach 3 inches (7 cm). The width of the ferrule ranged from 1 to 2 inches (3 to 5 cm).

    The regular rohatyn spearheads weighed between 0.45 and 0.90 lb (0.2 and 0.4 kg), whereas the whole spear weighed closer to 2.2 lb (1 kg). The rohatyn had the heaviest, most powerful, and widest spearhead of any Russian spear in history.

    Rohatyn’s Historical Origin

    Similar to the boar spears, the rohatyn has its origins within the Eastern European populations. However, in contrast to the boar spear (a.k.a. “saufeder“) developed by the Germans during the Roman Empire era, the rohatyn emerged at a later time after the Slavic communities had firmly established themselves in the regions of Russia, Ukraine, and Poland.

    According to historical records, the first sighting of the rohatyn occurred in the 12th century. In 1149, it was first mentioned as a weapon of war according to the Laurentian Codex.

    In the 1444 campaign of Vasily II of Moscow against the Tatars, chroniclers recalled the combat usage of the rohatyn in the failed fight of 1377 between the Russians and the Tatar Khan Arapsha (Arab-Shah Muzaffar).

    Beginning in the 16th century, the “feudal cavalry” (i.e., Landed Army) also used rohatyns. More than ninety percent (93%) of the over 200 analyzed spearheads from the 15th through 17th centuries in Russia were found to be made of rohatyn.

    In the 15th and 16th centuries, this weapon closely resembled pre-Mongolian spears. And it wasn’t until the 17th century that new varieties started to emerge.

    Both foot soldiers and mounted knights made effective use of battle rohatyns. The soldiers were able to halt battle horses and deal with troops wearing various types of armor.

    The Russian army continued to utilize them until the late 17th century. Finally phased out of military service and replaced by firearms, they were popular hunting tools at the turn of the 18th century.

    Description of the Rohatyn

    This is an etching of a scene from a bronze plate from the time of Vendel (c. 540–790 AD) that was found in Öland, Sweden. On the right is a berserker, while on the left is Oden or Odin.
    This is an etching of a scene from a bronze plate from the time of Vendel (c. 540–790 AD) that was found in Öland, Sweden. On the right is a berserker, while on the left is Oden or Odin.

    The details about this spear’s construction and various features can be gleaned from historical descriptions.

    Most rohatyn spears were made of high-quality steel and had intricate engravings and embellishments. In some species, the spearhead was adorned with gold, and below it, there were decorative markings.

    The central part of the spear could be decorated with gilded patterns, and some shafts were made of white bone with a scaly texture. Above the shaft, there could be more decorative elements, such as silver-gilded branches (decorative protrusions).

    Some spears had intricately woven handles made of gold and silver thread, adorned with crimson accents. The mouthpiece (at the end of the spearhead) could be made of silver, and some examples were wrapped with a green silk strap. In terms of value, a decorative rohatyn spear could be worth 60 rubles.

    Etymology of the Rohatyn

    In the “Hypatian Codex” under the year 1256, it is stated: “He, the warrior, wielded his sword, taking the rohatyn from his belt, swung it far and struck the Yatvyazhsky Prince from his horse.” At first glance, the term “rohatyn” appears to refer to a lightweight throwing weapon, similar to a javelin carried in a belt sheath.

    However, based on the same Hypatian Codex, this weapon could be a blunt and crushing type, similar to a mace or club: In the 11th to 13th centuries, objects of this kind used for military purposes were called ‘rogvitsa,’ ‘rogovitsa,’ ‘rogditsa,’ or ‘rohatyn.’ In battle, the ‘rohatyn’ (worn at the belt) was aimed at striking the head and even thrown at the enemy.

    Some historians also mention that the word may have Greek origins. Additionally, in the Polish language, the word “rohatyna” (meaning “spear”) is borrowed from Russian, while “rogacina” refers to the arrowhead.

    In the Russian city of Veliky Novgorod, there is a street called “Rogatitsa,” and in Bosnia and Ukraine there are towns named Rogatica and Rohatyn, respectively.

    Rohatyn in Scandinavia

    The ancient Scandinavians had spears that were similar in design. In contrast to the shorter blade (8 in; 20 cm), the spear-butt could be up to 20 inches (50 cm) in length. Hand-to-hand combat was the primary means of using what the Scandinavians referred to as “spike in armor” spears.

    It is easy to tell Western-made Viking spears apart from Slavic ones because of the decorative silver notches the latter added to the spear-butts.

    The Scandinavian rohatyn in Egil’s Saga (c. 850–1000):

    The spear’s head was two cubits (36 in; 90 cm) long and had a four-sided blade at the top. The upper part of the spearhead was wide, and the socket [spear-butt] was long and thick. The shaft was of such length that one could reach the socket with a hand while standing. It [socket] was very thick and reinforced with iron. An iron spike fastened the socket to the shaft.

    Egil’s Saga (c. 850–1000)

    Thorolf Kveldulfsson is a hero of the early part of Egil’s Saga who uses a rohatyn:

    Thorolf became so enraged that he threw his shield behind his back and gripped the spear with both hands. He charged forward, slashing and thrusting at the enemies to his right and left. People scattered in different directions, but he managed to kill many of them.

    Since a sword’s tip could easily crack upon impact with the thick socket of the rohatyn, wearing this spear conferred an edge over a sword-wielding fighter. The last battle in the 1995 film “The Viking Sagas” features such a spear.

    Such spears saw service on both land and sea for the Vikings. By throwing a rohatyn-like spear into the enemy ship, the hövding (tribal leader among Scandinavians) would begin the boarding attack.

    The later Swedish spears were also similar in design and they also served as support (or stabilizer) for musket shooting.

    Rohatyn at a Glance

    What were the main uses of the Rohatyn spear?

    The Rohatyn spear was primarily used for hunting, particularly to target large and dangerous animals such as brown bears, aurochs, and wild boars. It was also utilized for military purposes, both by cavalry and infantry, during the Middle Ages and the early 18th century.

    How did the crossguard contribute to hunting with the Rohatyn?

    The crossguard, placed beneath the blade of the spear, played a crucial role in hunting. It prevented the targeted animal, especially bears, from climbing up the spear by grabbing onto this part. This feature ensured the hunter’s safety and allowed for a swift renewal of the attack.

    What was the significance of the decorative knobs on the Rohatyn?

    According to historian Pavel Vinkler, the decorative knobs above and below the blade of this spear served two purposes. They not only enhanced the aesthetic appeal of the weapon but also acted as counterweights, ensuring better balance during combat or hunting.

    How did the Rohatyn spear evolve over time?

    This spear has a rich and ancient history, with variations emerging over different periods. In the 15th and 16th centuries, it closely resembled pre-Mongolian spears. New varieties began to emerge in the 17th century, with battle versions being developed specifically for piercing and slashing, capable of dealing with various types of armor. Eventually, firearms replaced the spear in military service by the late 17th century, but it remained in use as a hunting tool until the turn of the 18th century.

    References

    1. Medieval Weapons: An Illustrated History of Their Impact – Kelly DeVries, Robert Douglas Smith – Google Books
    2. The Use of Medieval Weaponry – Eric Lowe – Google Books
  • Ranseur: A 15th-Century Polearm That Looks like a Trident

    Ranseur: A 15th-Century Polearm That Looks like a Trident

    The ranseur, a large polearm with three blades, was employed as a backup to the pike in infantry squares in the 15th century. The ranseur’s center blade was usually rather long and occasionally huge in the form of the ox tongue spear, while the two flanking blades were variable in length and shape as they branched out from the central blade’s conical gorge. The ranseur is most often confused with the brandistock, a short pole weapon with three blades. Typically, a ranseur was taller than six feet.

    Ranseur
    Type of weapon:Polearm
    Other names:Roncone
    Origin:Corsica Island, Middle Ages weaponry
    UtilizationInfantry and ceremonial
    Length:70–120″ (1.8–3 m)
    Weight:3.3–4.8 lbs (2–2.2 kg)

    The Purpose of Its Crescent Crossguard

    In military history, this edged weapon is believed to have originated in Italy, just like many other medieval weapons. And it became widespread in the 16th and 17th centuries. The crossguard of this polearm generally lacked blades, as its purpose was to block enemy weapons.

    On occasion, the crossguard could be folded back—like a corseque—allowing its ends to function as hooks for grappling with opponents, such as dismounting riders from their horses. Most ranseurs produced for battle typically measured 70 inches (1.8 m) in length or longer.

    Ranseur’s Origin

    Warrior with a ranseur. Watercolor, 1575.
    Warrior with a ranseur. Watercolor, 1575. (Universiteitsbibliotheek UGent, CC BY-SA 4.0)

    The word “ranseur” comes from French, which in turn originated from Corsica, the Romance language spoken on the Mediterranean island of Corsica. This weapon is sometimes confused with the corseque in terminology.

    The central blade of this weapon was often longer and sharper than that of its “cousin” pole weapons, the partisan and corseque. The ranseur is mistakenly known as “roncone,” which looks more like a guisarme than anything else.

    The ranseur’s head is a spear’s tip with a cross hilt attached to its base, and it is widely believed that this design is a direct descendant of the older spetum. This hilt is often crescent-shaped, making the weapon seem like a trident.

    The ranseur is sometimes lumped in with other poled weapons by the most simplistically placed in the ranks of “spears” without any differentiation of excellence, unlike weapons with better-known histories like the halberd or the partisan.

    The crescent hilt of the ranseur makes it look like a trident.

    Italian linguists like to take a very straightforward approach to categorizing weaponry. The entry for the ranseur weapon in the fourth edition of the Vocabulary of the Academicians of the Crusca is a good example of this:

    “Spices of arms, in a rod similar to the pike. Lat. pilum [a Roman javelin].”

    The Vocabulary of the Academicians of the Crusca, by Bastiano De’ Rossi, edition 4, p. 464

    The ranseur was a polearm weapon used for thrusting attacks. It developed from the estoc sword, which infantry armies used in the 14th and 15th centuries to pierce the heavy armor of enemy knights.

    During the evolution from one-handed thrusting weapons to two-handed polearms, a notable transformation occurred with the introduction of the spetum—a variant of the ranseur featuring a shorter handle, roughly equivalent in length to the metal part.

    Most ranseurs were typically 6 feet (1.8 m) or longer.

    The triple tines (prongs or teeth) on a ranseur are ideal for warding off an armored foe at a safe distance. They are a unique characteristic that connects this melee weapon to the specialized hunting spears (Lat. venabulum) that have been employed since the Carolingian Dynasty (7th century) to kill large animals (see boar spear).

    a ranseur that is 8 feet (244 cm) in length, c. 1540, Italian.
    8 feet (244 cm) in length, c. 1540, Italian. (Image: Metmuseum)

    So, the ranseur is a cross between a spetum and a pike, a deadly weapon meant to kill the most formidable “prey” of all: the heavily armored horse-riding European knights.

    Ranseur’s History

    During the early 16th century, the ranseur rose in prominence among the Life Guards, and by the latter half of the century, it had become widely adopted as a ceremonial weapon. This cold weapon was particularly popular among Italian, Spanish, Swiss, and German infantry troops throughout its history.

    The European infantrymen clearly used the ranseur to attack from a distance and keep the enemy at bay. The pike, on the other hand, was designed to either impale the opponent or to form a wall of metal spikes that drove the adversary away.

    A 16th-century Italian ranseur, 97 in (246 cm) in length.
    A 16th-century Italian creation, 97 in (246 cm) in length.

    The ranseur was used to strike repeatedly at the enemy in order to move it or weaken it. With this trident-like spear in hand, the infantryman was able to perform a kind of fencing:

    “RANSEUR. Polearms that resemble pikes but have a shorter handle and a longer shaft, looking somewhat like a long sword [see spadone] perched on a staff.”

    Italian Military Dictionary by Giuseppe Grassi, p. 286

    Already in the 17th century, the ranseur had become a ceremonial weapon, or at least one destined for specialized training in guardhouses, despite having been used in the field as early as the 15th century.

    16th century ranseur
    A 16th-century Italian creation.

    In a battlefield dominated by the “Pike and Shot” battle tactics (which involved using firearms alongside long pikes or spears) of the Spanish tercios (military units), which was destined to develop into the “regimental” system introduced by the Swedes at the close of the Thirty Years War, the stationed fencing tactic of the ranseur was eventually pushed aside.

    The weapon was particularly popular among Italian, Spanish, Swiss, and German infantry troops.

    On the other hand, the ranseur saw extensive use during the Republic of Venice’s Cretan War (1645–1669) with the Ottoman Empire. The conflict ended after a very long siege by the Turks against the whole Venetian defenses on the island of Crete.

    Elaborate ceremonial variants with gilded blades and handles adorned with silk can be found in the collections of Vienna and Madrid. Notably, these ceremonial ranseurs feature a design that allows not only the shaft but also the lateral blades to be folded.

    The Use of the Ranseur

    Various attacks can be executed with this polearm, such as:

    1. Using it like a conventional spear for straightforward thrusts.
    2. Employing lateral strikes with the side blades of the main spear to deliver cutting blows.
    3. Diverting or disarming enemy weapons by employing the side branches (slats).
    4. Hooking and unbalancing adversaries, leading to their overthrow and potential dismounting from horseback, using the side branches.

    In contrast to the double-edged partisan, most ranseur hilts did not include a cutting edge. But the weapon could still be used to trap an opponent’s weapon below the main blade, where pressure could be applied from a distance with a simple twist of the shaft, or to dismount a mounted opponent.

    This polearm had a number of benefits as an infantry weapon. Thanks to the weapon’s long shaft, the foot troops could attack from a distance while still keeping control. In order to grab and disable an opponent’s weapon, or possibly disarm them entirely, the three-bladed head was often useful.

    The weapon could be used both for trusting and slashing.

    Infantrymen armed with this weapon could use its sharp blades to slash through armor and thrust their opponents where they were weak. The weapon’s prongs were useful for thrusting strikes, either because they could break through armor joints or because they expanded the weapon’s hitting surface.

    The weapon could be used for either slicing or thrusting because of its design and balance. The prongs of this weapon could be used to seize and grip an opponent’s weapon or armor, rendering them helpless and making them easier to disarm. When fighting on a horse, this could be a huge advantage.

    The weapon was particularly useful against foot soldiers since the rider could utilize the horse’s motion as leverage to throw off the target’s balance or seize control of them.

    The weapon remained a popular choice especially among the Swiss weapons and the German polearms in Renaissance warfare.

    The Construction of the Ranseur

    Among the historical polearms, the ranseur is an offshoot of the spetum and consists of the following:

    • A head made of metal, gorged like a pyramid, tapers to a long, sharp middle blade (which is sometimes called an “ox tongue”).
    • Two metal projections emerge from this gorge; one resembles a fork, while the other may have been interpreted as a blade.
    • Some examples have lateral prongs so thin and projecting parallel to the center tooth that the weapon can be considered a true battle trident.
    • All ranseurs have a large wooden shaft, on par with that of a halberd or glaive.

    References

    1. The Italian ranseur in the featured image: BRANDISTOCCO – Lotsearch.net
    2. Italian Military Dictionary – Giuseppe Grassi – Google Books
    3. Vocabulary of the Academicians of the Crusca, by Bastiano De’ Rossi – Google Books
    4. European Weapons and Armour: From the Renaissance to the Industrial Revolution – Ewart Oakeshott – Google Books
  • Spontoon: A 17th-Century Pike in American History

    Spontoon: A 17th-Century Pike in American History

    The spontoon (or “half-pike”) was a pole weapon that often exceeded 80 inches (2 m) in length and sported a sharp tip with an inverted crossguard. In certain variations, the spontoon looks just like a partisan, which is an entirely different type of weapon in terms of its shape and design. The second part of the 17th century saw the introduction of spontoons and newer infantry combat tactics. This cold weapon gained popularity and widespread use throughout Europe in the subsequent centuries, remaining in use until the 19th century as one of the most commonly used pike weapons.

    The name comes from the French word esponton, which in the Middle Ages meant dagger.

    Spontoon
    Type of weapon:Polearm
    Other names:Half-pike, Ceremonial spear
    Origin:Italy, Middle Ages
    UtilizationInfantry and ceremonial
    Total length:80–100 inches (2–2.5 m)
    Weight:2.2–2.65 lb (1–1.2 kg)

    Initially, this weapon was always less than a cubit (18 inches) from the height of its user, although when it entered the official position, its measurement changed to 7 feet (2.10 m).

    There are specimens from 72 to 95 inches (184 to 240 cm). The military spontoons were often 85 inches (215 cm) long and weighed 2.65 lb (1.2 kg), with a blade length of 15 inches (37 cm).

    Spontoon vs. Ranseur vs. Partisan

    Some alleged spontoons with their thick, triangular spearheads bear a striking resemblance to partisans. It seems that throughout history, there has been a perplexing mix-up in the nomenclature of these weapons.

    The actual spontoons (the first one in the above image) sported a quadrangular or spherical spearhead with no lateral blades, and they look nothing like that aforementioned variant.

    The aforementioned spontoons also look similar to the ranseur because of the blade’s tricuspid leaf. However, the distinctive feature of the ranseur’s three teeth coming from a single point makes it simple to distinguish between them.

    According to the Italian Military Dictionary (1833) by Giuseppe Grassi:

    Spontoon, derived from the French term “Esponton,” refers to rod weapons featuring a long quadrangular or round iron head that is relatively small but sharp at the tip. While it had some usage during chivalrous times [11th–15th centuries], it was not primarily employed as a battlefield weapon. However, modern armies reintroduced it in the 17th century, where it served as the weapon of choice for infantry officers until the late 18th century. Known as a half-pike in French, it measured eight feet in length. The spontoon gradually fell out of favor during the French Revolution. Additionally, it is worth mentioning that the spontoon, along with other polearm weapons, occasionally played a role in the defensive tactics employed during sieges.

    Italian Military Dictionary, Volumes 1–2 by Giuseppe Grassi, 1833.

    Spontoon’s Design

    Shaft

    A spontoon with an elaborately etched broad blade and a crossbar at its base.
    A spontoon with an elaborately etched broad blade and a crossbar at its base. (Image: Metropolitan Museum of Art)

    A blade of iron or steel was fastened to a sturdy wooden shaft (pikestaff) to create the spontoon. All spontoons were built from durable and sturdy hardwoods.

    This double-edged infantry weapon was pointed at one end with a thin but long iron blade that could be either square or rounded.

    Almost all spontoons adorned a crossguard that was inverted at its tip. While the other variant with lateral blades usually had no crossguards and therefore looked more like a partisan.

    In contrast to the pike, the spontoon was a weapon of more manageable proportions. At its longest, this polearm still measured less than 100 inches (250 cm).

    Blade

    spontoon, 1756-1762.
    Spontoon, 1756-1762.

    Confusion with the partisan weapon: Throughout history, there have been two distinct variations of the spontoon.

    One variation resembles a partisan weapon (seen in the center of the above image), characterized by its elongated blade with lateral projections, while the actual spontoon (seen in the below image) bears a closer resemblance to a traditional spear.

    The real spontoon (above) has a broad and spherical spearhead with a crossguard inverted at the tips. The other “alleged” spontoon with lateral blades does not have a crossguard.

    In this lateral-bladed version, the blade begins as a metal cone and gradually flattens into a half-disc shape. The blade’s central, thick portion and its two lateral blades emerge from this disc.

    The lateral blades, which may take the form of arched prongs, are noticeably shorter than the central blade. The main blade is pointed and lanceolate in cross-section and tapered on both sides.

    In certain variations, the central flat portion of the blade is ingeniously designed to incorporate an axe blade, creating a hybrid structure that combines the functionalities of both a spontoon and an axe, making this weapon ideal for chopping (see: Bec de Corbin).

    Spontoon’s History

    Infantry officer with spontoon, 1756--1761.
    Infantry officer with spontoon, 1756–1761.

    During the Middle Ages, the spontoon was invented in Italy, just like many infantry spears and staff weapons. It was used to describe a type of spear in Italy during the 16th century and later referred to as a “half-pike” in France in the 17th century. These weapons, often adorned with coats of arms or monograms, were used as symbols of military prestige.

    Swords with lances, spikes, or halberds were standard issues for officers, noncommissioned officers, and corporals in the 17th century. This gave rise to the spontoon, a weapon that was originally more for show than defense.

    The linear tactics of the period necessitated that the infantry be kept in a straight line, and this polearm was used primarily to enforce this. Soldiers of the banner guard were commonly armed with such weapons because of their utility in repelling enemy cavalry.

    A short history and the demonstration of the weapon.

    During the time of Louis XIV (1638–1715), it was exclusively reserved for officers, serving as a military-grade weapon until the French Revolution in 1789. In Spain, the spontoon, along with other polearms, was utilized by infantry in the 16th century. Eventually, it became the exclusive weapon of officers, following the fashion set by Philip IV of Spain. The halberd was used by sergeants, while higher-ranking officers wielded the spontoon.

    It was early American military equipment that belonged to 18th-century weaponry.

    In most armies, noncommissioned officers and corporals no longer carried lances, spikes, or halberds by the end of the 18th century. After the Napoleonic Wars, the majority of armies only carried swords and sabers, with some commanders also carrying pistols if necessary or desired.

    In Poland, it was used in the military under Saxon rule until the army reform by the Great Sejm in the late 18th century. In England, officers used it until 1786, and sergeants used it from 1792 to 1830. Sergeants in several different armies kept their spontoons around 1850, long after they had been phased out elsewhere.

    The Functionality of the Spontoon

    Spontoon, 1701 - 1750.
    Spontoon, 1701 – 1750.

    It served first as a defensive weapon during sieges to defend city walls and then as a ceremonial object. Infantry troops used it as a half-pike in the pikemen formations (“Pike and Shot”) that were the standard battlefield model at the time in the 17th century.

    Pikemen with spontoons in square formations became the standard for city defense in this century, expanding the capabilities of infantry units. While their fellow soldiers transitioned from a column formation to a line formation, it was crucial that the men holding their posts did it successfully.

    The weapon fell into disuse during the Napoleonic Wars.

    In situations when forces had to change formations while under attack from the enemy, the spontoon proved vital, as its carriers in the rear lines were able to shield the troops in the front from the oncoming attacks.

    The spontoon also gained popularity as a weapon for use on the high seas while approaching ships. Similar to the halberd and its variants in the British Army, this polearm remained in use as a weapon for infantry company commanders until almost the end of the 18th century.

    potsdam-giants
    Officers with spontoons ahead of the grenadiers. Carl Röchling’s Battle of Hohenfriedeberg painting, Attack of Prussian Infantry, June 4th, 1745, shows the Potsdam Giants Grenadier Guards Batallion.

    This weapon was a characteristic weapon of noncommissioned officers that persisted until the 18th century, even as the bayonet superseded other bladed weapons on European battlefields.

    The spontoon was first used in Prussia by King Frederick I (r. 1701–1713). However, its usage had been outlawed in some European countries, including Prussia, since 1806.

    They were outlawed during the reign of Catherine the Great in Russia, reinstated under the reign of Paul I, then outlawed once again in 1807. The elimination of all polearms in the Prussian army marked the end of their usage. However, it actually fell into disuse during the Napoleonic Wars.

    Several English noncommissioned officers utilized the spontoons at the Battle of Culloden (16 April 1746). Even during the Napoleonic Wars, sergeants relied primarily on this weapon to protect the battalion or regimental insignia against assaults by horsemen.

    Spontoon in American History

    The spontoon lasted in use long enough to make it into American history and join the Revolutionary War arms. During the Revolutionary War and the early years of the United States, this weapon was an important ceremonial and symbolic weapon. In the 1890s, active American troops were still using this polearm.

    Commissioned officers were required to carry a spontoon, per the American Militia Acts of 1792. Lewis and Clark’s Corps of Discovery voyage included the use of this weapon. The polearm served the Corps throughout their travels into bear territory.

    • The American officers in infantry units in the 18th century made extensive use of this two-handed spear. Officers carried these symbols of power to lead their men on the battlefield. Despite their lack of regular employment in battle, they were sometimes put to use in intense hand-to-hand combat.
    • This weapon had great symbolic and ceremonial significance in the American armed forces. On the battlefield, it served as a visible marker for troops to identify their superiors and as a symbol of the officer’s power and leadership.
    • The European military traditions, especially those of the British Army, affected the development of the American spontoon’s design. The American military later adopted and modified the weapon after first using it by British commanders stationed in the American colonies.
    • The polearm rose to prominence in history as a weapon used by commanders on both sides of the American Revolutionary War. Early American military forces like the Continental Army and state militias also made extensive use of it.

    Today, the US Army’s Fife and Drum Corps use spontoons, one of the colonial military weapons, as a ceremonial weapon (also known as an espontoon).

    Later, as warfare strategies and technology advanced, the weapon became obsolete in Europe and the United States. Its role on the battlefield shifted from that of a primary weapon to a more ceremonial one when guns (like muskets) and other innovations were introduced.

    It was no longer issued to officers as a matter of course by the late 18th century, having given way to newer firearms.

    Conclusion

    Historical polearms like this hold great appeal for militaria collectors and military history enthusiasts alike, who find intrigue in acquiring and studying polearm replicas, gaining a deeper understanding of the weaponry used in historical conflicts.

    Originally intended for close-range combat, the spontoon became primarily a rank badge for infantry officers. It was prominently used during battles to guide soldiers in maintaining lines, distances, and formations. Additionally, it served ceremonial purposes during parades and salutes, and even some palace guards wielded this polearm.

    The Spontoon at a Glance

    What is a spontoon?

    The spontoon is a pole weapon that was commonly used in Europe from the 17th to the 19th centuries. It was a long polearm, often exceeding 80 inches in length, with a sharp tip and an inverted crossguard. Originally derived from the French term “Esponton,” it was primarily utilized by infantry officers and had both ceremonial and battlefield applications.

    How did the spontoon differ from other weapons like the ranseur and partisan?

    This weapon had some similarities to the ranseur and partisan, leading to confusion in the nomenclature. However, the distinct features of the real spontoon included a quadrangular or spherical spearhead with no lateral blades and an inverted crossguard at the tip. In contrast, the ranseur had three teeth coming from a single point, while the partisan had an elongated blade with lateral projections.

    What was the role of the spontoon in military history?

    This polearm served as a defensive weapon during sieges and was used in infantry formations during battles. It played a crucial role in maintaining straight lines and enforcing formations, particularly during the linear tactics of the 17th century. Additionally, the weapon had ceremonial significance and symbolized military prestige. Over time, its usage declined with the advent of newer firearms and changes in warfare strategies.

    How did the spontoon find its place in American history?

    The weapon made its way into American history during the Revolutionary War and the early years of the United States. Commissioned officers were required to carry a spontoon, and it became a symbol of power and leadership on the battlefield. It was also utilized ceremonially and had significance within the American armed forces. Lewis and Clark’s Corps of Discovery expedition even included the use of these polearms during their travels.

    What is the status of the spontoon today?

    This weapon is now considered obsolete in modern warfare and is primarily of interest to militaria collectors and military history enthusiasts. However, it still holds ceremonial value in certain contexts. For example, the US Army’s Fife and Drum Corps use these spears as ceremonial weapons. Its historical significance and unique design continue to captivate those interested in studying and preserving military weaponry from the past.

  • Boar Spear: A Weapon of Manliness in Ancient Rome

    Boar Spear: A Weapon of Manliness in Ancient Rome

    The Germanic barbarians of the Roman era created and popularized a new sort of spear known as the boar spear. The boar spear has a diamond-shaped metal tip mounted on a short, heavy shaft with lugs (sometimes called “wings”) at the gorge to prevent the boar from charging the hunter while s/he is impaling the animal. Its basic design is similar to that of the winged lance, a medieval weapon popular at the time, as well as the Bohemian earspoon of the 14th century.

    Boar Spear
    Type of weapon:Polearm
    Other names:Saufeder in German
    Origin:Germanic barbarians
    UtilizationHunting and infantry
    Total length:90 inches (2.3 m)
    Weight:4 lb (1.8 kg)

    The wings on the boar spear also made it useful in battle, as they could be snagged on an opponent’s shield and torn off, or they could be forced forward to deflect an oncoming spear. In the 16th century, the boar spear was a prestige symbol for the leaders of the foot army as well as a weapon of combat.

    Boar spears can sometimes be confused with bear spears or rogatinas.

    During the High Middle Ages (1000–1300), these edged weapons were still in use, although they eventually died out due to the popularity of the jousting lance. A version with a longer tip was employed for combat in Italy in the 15th century.

    Boar spear, French, dated 1576.
    Boar spear, French, dated 1576.

    Some modern-day boar hunters still use hounds and boar spears, much like their medieval ancestors. A mature wild boar has impressive strength. When it protects itself, it poses a major threat because of the severity of the damage it can inflict.

    The Origins of the Boar Spear

    In the civilizations of the Indo-Europeans, hunting wild boars has always played a significant role, frequently serving as a test of bravery and manliness as well as a means of providing for basic survival needs. Initiation into maturity was marked by the first wild boar hunt among the ancient Romans.

    Similarly, in the amphitheaters of minor rural villages remote from the big gladiatorial circuit in Rome and Capua, the slaughter of wild pigs was a highly admired sight. The boar spear was born as a new cold weapon out of this need.

    Men on a hunting expedition, all equipped with boar spears. Tapestry woven in Belgium in the 15th century.
    Men on a hunting expedition, all equipped with boar spears. Tapestry woven in Belgium in the 15th century. (Valerie McGlinchey, Attribution-Share Alike 2.5 Generic)

    Although the Latin-Italic peoples did not invent the boar spear used for hunting wild boar, its origins can be traced back to the period of the Roman Empire.

    The Germanic barbarians invented the wild boar spear because their civilization centered on hunting and wild animals (such as boars, bears, and wolves) had an essential symbolic role in their society.

    After the wild boar had been captured and debilitated by the hounds, it was killed using the boar spear (“saufeder” in German). It was a big and heavy weapon fitted with lug wings to keep the beast at a safe distance from the hunter.

    History of the Boar Spear

    The Germans, for their part, resorted to using the boar spear in combat as well. The weapon’s durability ensured that it could easily break through hostile shields and armor. The “wings” on the spear made it more versatile, allowing it to catch an enemy shield or deflect a strike from another spear or sword, such as the partisan, guisarme, or flamberge.

    The Roman Empire began systematically recruiting Germans as mercenaries in the 2nd century AD, and it was at this time that this massively tipped boar spear with stopping “wings” spread across Germany.

    Evidence of the weapon and its employment may be seen in numerous mosaics, thanks to the widespread Germanization of the Empire that ensured its inclusion in Roman art by the 4th century AD.

    Changes to the Boar Spear in the Middle Ages

    16th-century German boar spear.
    16th-century German boar spear.

    Roman-barbarian fighters (Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Vandals, Burgundians, Lombards, Franks, etc.) and later troops of the Holy Roman Empire utilized the same sort of spear for both wild boar hunting and fighting during the High Middle Ages (1000–1300).

    An explicit mention is made of a boar hunting episode featuring Emperor Charlemagne in the book Karolus Magnus et Leo papa. Charlemagne successfully hunts a wild boar with the weapon. The book is preserved at the Abbey of St. Gall and attributed (likely erroneously) to the poet Angilbert (740–814).

    Odin, the ultimate warrior-god, was often shown by the Vikings in Northern Europe, who lived outside the cultural basin of Carolingian Europe, with a holy Gungnir spear with the usual lugs of a boar’s spear.

    It is interesting to note that the Germanic wedge formation, which was favored in combat and was said to have been created by the deity Odin, was also known as the “formation with the boar’s head” (Svinfylking in Old Norse or caput porcinum in Latin). Saxo Grammaticus’s Gesta Danorum gives a detailed account of the Germans’ strategic usage of the wedge.

    The Holy Lance, an icon of the Holy Roman Empire (the lance that is said to have pierced the side of Jesus while he was crucified on the cross), is a modified boar spear with two mock blades running the length of the weapon from its lugs to its tip.

    After the jousting spear developed as the preferred weapon of the Franco-Norman heavy cavalry in the Late Middle Ages (1300–1500), the boar spear was consigned to the ranks of infantry armies.

    The Decline of the Boar Spear

    Roman boar spear sarcophagus detail.
    Roman boar spear sarcophagus detail. (Image)

    Long-bladed swords (see spadone) also began to proliferate in the hunting field as the tactical and symbolic significance of the sword increased along with advancements in European metallurgy as a result of contact with the eastern Mediterranean basin through the Crusades (such as Damascus steel).

    After the wild boar had been crippled and trapped by the hounds and by the servants armed with spears, the high-ranking European hunters started to use their swords to exterminate the beast.

    Even among the Carolingian emperors, who saw wild boar hunting as a good way to practice their martial arts, the trend persisted and even grew during the Late Middle Ages (1300–1500), eventually giving rise to the Renaissance-era invention of the “hunting sword”.

    In the 15th century, foot soldiers were still using the boar spear. This included not just the common infantryman but also the knight, who had been forced to fight on the ground instead of on horseback.

    The master of fencing, Fiore dei Liberi (1350–1410) details the precise use of the boar spear against an opponent on horseback in his work Flos Duellatorum (around 1409–1410). This involves striking the enemy in the head with both the spear’s tip and its handle.

    The Boar Spear’s Design

    When a boar spear was inserted into a chamber or rib cage, it was claimed to cause instantaneous death by severing the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels. Thus, a boar spear had to be very sturdy because of its intended use:

    • The length of the metal head varied between 8 and 16 inches (20 and 40 cm). The “wings” (lugs) of the spear’s lozenge-shaped blade were attached to the shaft by a conical or pyramidal gorge. This metal point was heavy enough to ensure the weapon could penetrate the boar’s thick rib cage and deliver a lethal blow to the boar’s heart.
    • The 80-inch (2 m) long rod was fashioned from a single piece of specially selected wood (such as the ash wood) to prevent breaking. It was sometimes wrapped in leather for a better grip and was designed to withstand the impact of the blow as well as the pressure exerted by the enraged animal. The hunters intended on keeping the animal blocked with the lugs.

    The boar spear’s harsh edges were rounded down during the Renaissance to reflect the prevailing aesthetic and military trends of the period. For this reason, later versions of the weapon, notably those made in Italy, include a “leaf” blade similar to the pike’s and long, curved “wings” that resemble the corseque spear’s prongs.

    Boar Spear Today

    Even in modern times, the boar spear is employed to dispatch of wounded wildlife. When compared to a gunfire, killing a wild boar with a boar spear is preferable since the dogs hunting the pig are not put in danger and their hearing is not damaged by the loud explosion. While hunting, the boar spear is sometimes used as a defense weapon in case of an attack. However, expertise and experience are necessary while tackling this issue.

    Aside from the aforementioned exceptional circumstance, the boar spear is mostly employed as a decorative object in hunting halls and as a trophy for meritorious hunters.

    In many jurisdictions, shooting wild boar with nothing more than a boar spear is not against the law. But when there is a possibility of animal cruelty from inexperience or lack of competence, hunting with a boar spear becomes troublesome on a daily basis. Engaging in hand-to-hand combat with an aggressive animal carries the inherent risk of endangering one’s own well-being and life.

    The Boar Spear at a Glance

    What is a boar spear, and how was it used in battle?

    The boar spear was a spear-like weapon popularized by the Germanic barbarians during the Roman era. It featured a diamond-shaped metal tip mounted on a short, heavy shaft with lugs or wings at the gorge. These wings served multiple purposes, such as preventing a charging boar from reaching the hunter and providing versatility in battle. They could be used to snag an opponent’s shield, tear it off, or deflect incoming attacks. The boar spear proved durable and effective, capable of breaking through shields and armor.

    What role did the boar spear play in hunting and warfare throughout history?

    The boar spear had a significant historical role in both hunting and warfare. In hunting, it originated from the need to capture and kill wild boars, which were highly symbolic and held cultural significance among the Germanic tribes. The weapon allowed hunters to keep a safe distance from the boar while delivering a lethal blow. In warfare, the boar spear was utilized by Germanic and Roman-barbarian fighters during the High Middle Ages. It provided them with a versatile and effective weapon for combat, capable of breaching shields and deflecting strikes.

    How did the decline of the boar spear come about?

    The popularity of the boar spear declined over time due to several factors. The emergence of long-bladed swords in the hunting field, as well as advancements in European metallurgy through contact with the eastern Mediterranean, contributed to the trend. High-ranking European hunters began using swords to finish off boars after they had been trapped and weakened by hounds and spears. Additionally, the rise of the jousting lance as the preferred weapon for heavy cavalry in the Late Middle Ages relegated the boar spear to infantry armies.

    What were the key design features of the boar spear?

    The boar spear was designed with durability and effectiveness in mind. Its metal head varied in length between 8 and 16 inches and had a lozenge-shaped blade with lugs or wings attached to the shaft. The sturdy 80-inch long wooden shaft, often wrapped in leather for a better grip, could withstand the impact of a blow and the force exerted by a boar. The rounded edges of the spear’s blade were later refined during the Renaissance to align with the aesthetic and military trends of the time, resulting in versions with a leaf blade and long, curved wings.

    References

    1. Flos duellatorum – Fiore Dei Liberi, Giovanni Rapisardi – Google Books
    2. Medieval Combat: A Fifteenth-century Illustrated Manual of Swordfighting and Close-quarter Combat – Hans Talhoffer, 1467 – Google Books
    3. The Danish History, Late 12th – Early 13th Century A.D., by Saxo Grammaticus – Gutenberg.org
    4. Treasures from the Tower of London: An Exhibition of Arms and Armour – Alexander Vesey Bethune Norman, G. M. Wilson, 1982 – Google Books
  • Corseque: A 14th-Century Winged Polearm of the Corsica Island

    Corseque: A 14th-Century Winged Polearm of the Corsica Island

    During the Middle Ages, European armies utilized poled weapons such as the corseque, which had a shaft between 70 and 100 inches (1.8 and 2.5 m) in length and a metal head with a central blade (cusp) flanked by two prongs in the shape of curving wings. The convex edges in the corseque were more often used for cutting than the concave ones. The weapon appeared like a trident, the weapon of the sea god Poseidon. But this spear is actually a development of the 12th-century venabulum (hunting-spear) from the Middle Ages. It was in use until the early modern period (around the 17th century).

    Corseque
    Type of weapon:Polearm
    Other names:Chauve-souris
    Origin:Corsica Island
    UtilizationInfantry
    Total length:70 to 100 inches (1.8–2.5 m)
    Weight:6.5–9 lb (3–4 kg)

    The Corseque’s Definition

    The corseque is a cold weapon with two elongated blades, featuring large, strongly curved blade hooks on two sides. The hooks are used to grasp, pull closer, injure, unbalance, or overthrow the opponent.

    Additionally, the hooks serve to drag down shields, hindering the opponent and depriving them of their cover.

    The weapon was mainly used in Italy and France. Corsican mercenaries serving the Italian states and the French crown popularized this polearm throughout the 15th and 17th centuries.

    The corseque was merely an intermediate development that mostly emerged in the 14th century and was eventually superseded by the glaive around the 16th century.

    The History of the Corseque

    Corseque, c. 1520, Italy, Venice, 106 in (270 cm) in length (along with the chauve-souris on the right which resembles a ranseur).
    Corseque, c. 1520, Italy, Venice, 106 in (270 cm) in length (along with the chauve-souris on the right which resembles a ranseur). (Image: The Cleveland Museum of Art)

    The corseque weapon got its name because it was first created on the island of Corsica, near France and Italy. The weapon is widely believed to be one of the many military developments of the hunting-spear originally designed for hunting large, hazardous animals like wild boars, bears, etc. (such as the boar spear)

    It is thought that this weapon, which can penetrate an object and then hook it by pulling it to the ground, is a cross between a hunting-spear and a pike. The French polearm also has similarities to the partisan weapon.

    Other theories suggest the spetum and ranseur pole weapons as the origins of the corseque.

    The curved prongs (also known as flukes or wing blades) of the infantryman’s corseque would hook onto the corners of the knight’s armor, enabling the wielder to forcefully pull the rider from his horse. The weapon with curved hooks or wings looking up, toward the blade, is known as a ranseur.

    Corseque polearm weapon: c. 1530, North Italy. Steel. 100 in. (254 cm); Blade: 10.2 in. (26 cm); Weight: 5.86 lb (2.66 kg).
    c. 1530, North Italy. Steel. 100 in. (254 cm); Blade: 10.2 in. (26 cm); Weight: 5.86 lb (2.66 kg).

    Since the long and tapered metal tip of the corseque was sturdy, it could be sharpened several times and used to pierce plate armor. The central spike could either be used to attempt to pierce the breastplate of a cuirass or the visor of a helmet.

    The Corseque’s Variants

    There are ceremonial versions of this edged weapon that were never created for warfare. Originally, they attempted to represent the French monarchial symbol “fleur-de-lis” and served as a weapon for troops and guards of the aristocracy. This version was primarily used during the 16th century.

    Two distinct varieties of this weapon existed:

    • The true corseque has a long central blade (cusp) that’s either rhomboidal or square in cross-section, and it’s tailed off at the base by two spread and arched wings that each finish in a spike. The concave sides are often not sharpened at all.
    • The chauve-souris, unlike the true corseque, has triangular side blades instead of the wings and longitudinal ribs that branch out from the gorge. The gorge is at a 45-degree angle from the two lateral webbed blades. The whole blade is razor sharp, making it ideal for thrusting rather than grappling. This variant of the corseque was usually ornate. Its name comes from the French word for “bat,” chauve, since the blades on the sides are sometimes compared to the wings of a bat.

    There is also the “three-bladed staff” mentioned as part of Henry VIII’s (the former king of England, 1491–1547) arsenal. There are 80 rawcon spears in this arsenal, which suggests that the two weapons (rawcon and corseque) were not seen as interchangeable by 16th-century Englishmen.

    A video by ThegnThrand, describing the main features of the corseque polearm.

    Similar Weapons

    The corseque is a polearm that has a core double-edged blade and two sharp, outstretched wings. The guard on the side blades protected the soldier’s hand as he stabbed with the main blade.

    There are several closely related species of this European spear:

    • Trident – lateral thin wings, usually without an edged blade, pointed, and the same length as the main spike.
    • Ranseur – lateral branches are usually bent forward without an edged blade and are about twice as long as the main spike.
    • Spetum – lateral branches directed forward at an angle of 45°, they are bladed.
    • Corseca – the lateral branches, which are bladed, are directed forward and then bent backward. This version of corseque was popular in Spain.
    • Partisan – lateral branches that are perpendicular or slightly folded forward, with edged blades.

    The Corseque at a Glance

    What is the origin of the corseque weapon?

    The weapon originated on the island of Corsica, near France and Italy.

    How were the curved prongs used in combat?

    The curved prongs, resembling wings, were used to hook onto the corners of a knight’s armor, allowing the wielder to forcefully pull the rider from their horse.

    What are the variants of this weapon?

    There are two distinct variants. The true corseque has a long central cusp with spread and arched wings, while the chauve-souris has triangular blades, longitudinal ribs, and razor-sharp edges.

    What are some similar weapons?

    Similar weapons include the trident, ranseur, spetum, corseca, and partisan, each with their own variations in blade shape and direction of lateral branches.

    References

  • Guisarme: Farmer’s Tool in Peace, Soldier’s Weapon in War

    Guisarme: Farmer’s Tool in Peace, Soldier’s Weapon in War

    The guisarme is a medieval pole weapon that looks like a halberd but has a sickle-like blade on two sides and terminates in a spearhead at the bottom with one or more spikes. As a refined form of the billhook, this cold weapon first appeared in the 11th century. As more and more polearms featured the same hook, the term “guisarme” grew to encompass any polearm with a hook on the blade. The names bill-guisarme, voulge-guisarme, and glaive-guisarme are examples of this.

    The Etymology of the Guisarme

    The French word “guisarme”, which was borrowed into English, has its roots in another French word wîsarm, which in turn derives from the Germanic wisarme.

    In other sources, the origin of this name is a Germanic word called getīsarn in Old High German, which meant “weeding iron”. It possibly refers to the production of iron and iron tools through smelting and forging.

    Italian guisarme, 16th century.
    Italian guisarme, 16th century. (MetMuseum)

    The word likely came from the Proto-Germanic getīhsernan, which meant “to make ironwork” or “to work with iron”. However, the original name of this edged weapon still remains a theory.

    The peasants of rural Europe who were obligated to serve in the military helped spread this sort of weapon/tool throughout the Middle Ages. For instance, the Venetian Republic’s territorial holdings in Italy had a sizable population of cernida (territorial armies) who used this weapon.

    Guisarme
    Type of weapon:Polearm
    Other names:Welsh Hook, Forest Bill, Roncone, Rossschinder
    Origin:Germanic or English/French
    Distribution:Throughout Europe
    Total length:Around 80 to 100 inches (2-2.5 m)
    Weight:6.5-9 lb (3-4 kg)

    The Guisarme’s Design

    In the guisarme weapon, there are elements of the spear, billhook (an agricultural tool used to cut tree branches), poleaxe, and war hammer (see: Bec de Corbin). The three main parts of the weapon include a wooden handle, a curved blade with spikes and a hook, and a pommel with a spearhead.

    The two-handed polearm’s shaft is often crafted from wood and has a rounded handle. The spear point is attached to the end of a blade resembling a poleaxe or billhook, the forerunners of this weapon.

    16th century Italian guisarme.
    16th century Italian guisarme. (MetMuseum)

    Thus, the polearm could be used to attack the opponent and also to unseat opposing riders or hamstring their steeds with the hook, with its piercing and cutting qualities.

    As with the “sauroter” (the rear of the spear with a spike) on traditional spears like the dory spear (the chief spear of hoplites—heavy cavalry—in Ancient Greece), a pointed spike was often placed on the pommel.

    The Variants of the Guisarme

    Guisarme, along with most known polearms.
    Guisarme, along with most known polearms. (Image: Originally a Public Domain)
    1. The bill-guisarme was a hybrid form of this weapon and the bill polearm that had a side spur unlike the first variants. A full chunk of iron was forged into the tip of this weapon. The bill featured a crescent-shaped or hooked blade that was sharpened on the inside and had a pointed tip for stabbing. It was useful against both armored and unarmored foes since it could be cut or pushed. Infantrymen of the late Middle Ages often carried this variant.
    2. The voulge-guisarme was another variant of the weapon used in Europe throughout the 14th and 15th centuries. The blade was usually equipped with a spear tip in addition to its curved or hook-shaped cutting edge, which resembled a voulge. It was most effective against unarmored or poorly armored foes due to its primary usage in cutting and slashing strikes. Soldiers on foot and in infantry formations often employed this weapon.
    3. The glaive-guisarme gained popularity in Europe during the 15th century. It resembled a glaive. This variant of the weapon was a long, single-edged bladed weapon. A hook or spike was often attached to the rear of the blade, which could be curved or straight. Its primary use was as a cutting and slicing weapon, giving its user the range and reach of a long polearm. Infantrymen and guardsmen alike were frequent users of this weapon.

    Guisarme is sometimes known as the Welsh hook or forest bill.

    The Use of Guisarme

    The demonstration of the weapon in History.

    The tip of the guisarme could be used to stab like a spear, while the pruning blade might be used as a hook to attempt to pull the riders or the legs of their mounts (by cutting the tendons of the enemy’s horse).

    There are allusions to this weapon in literature as early as 12th-century England. Beginning in the 12th century and continuing through the 14th and 15th centuries, this form of plebeian weapon was often employed in the rural areas of Europe during the Middle Ages until the 19th century. For comparison, the earliest billhook itself (the ancestor of this weapon) dates back to the 11th century.

    Guisarme
    (Image)

    In the historical annals of the Peninsular War (1808–1814), the employment of this polearm is noted during the Galician uprisings against Napoleon’s forces.

    Because of its characteristics as an agricultural tool, the guisarme was a successful balance between low cost and high utility—since there was a shortage of metal at the time and it offered both agricultural and military capabilities.

    Guisarme in History

    The guisarme weapon, in a part of the painting by Pinturicchio (1502–1509).
    The guisarme weapon, in a part of the painting by Pinturicchio (1502–1509).

    The Impressment (the taking of men into the military by compulsion) in Europe, who were known to make use of polearms resembling peasant implements, were the first to be credited with using the guisarme. This is a typical characteristic ascribed to polearms throughout history.

    In one theory, the guisarme is said to have originated in either France or England, and to have developed from peasant implements such as the scythe or the glaive. The English infantry corps of the 14th century and the Franc-archers (a regular infantry in France) of the 15th century popularized this weapon throughout Europe.

    Given the wide variety of multi-bladed pole weapons and the numerous etymological and translation challenges associated with them (bill, bill-hook, guisarme, bisarme, partisane, partisan, glaive, vougue, voulgue, fauchard, halberd, etc.), the French version (where archers were even called “guisarmiers” for a period) appears to be the most accurate name of this polearm.

    As a result, there are occasional translation errors and historical reports that refer to a different kind of weapon. In a guisarme, the “hook” and “spike” were joined to a shaft of approximately 80 inches (2 m), and this simple weapon was especially employed to defend foot soldiers and/or archers in the aforementioned two nations.

    The two major functions of this “composite” blade polearm—hooking and knocking down and assaulting by piercing—are its defining features. That’s where it got its start, and that’s where it changed further.

    Later, in order to prevent strikes from being deflected by shields and armor, tiny spikes were added to the traditionally curved edge. This was done to assure “grip” on blows rather than to increase damage. However, the rudimentary design of the long spike at the top and the hook that emerges in the shape of a serpentine from the spear’s “iron” remained intact.

    The contemporary English term for this weapon was “bill-hook,” a variation on “bill-guisarme,” and “guisarme” was used even when the weapon lacked an upper spike. According to this theory, the French word for the weapon—the guisarme—might be derived from the fauchard (another polearm) and faux de guerre (war scythe).

    The “practical” length of these combat polearms was often equivalent to the height of a man’s extended arm, so that its length wouldn’t get in the way while swinging the spear from side to side. Keep in mind that large groups didn’t start using long spears in battle until much later in history.

    The typical English soldier of the late Middle Ages stood between 67 and 70 inches (1.7 – 1.8 m), so a weapon of this sort would have to be at least 80 inches (200 cm) tall to reach its target.

    The main blade of this weapon often had a long spike protruding from its bottom half in a perpendicular orientation; however, this detail varied from country to country. A typical form of the guisarme in 16th-century Italy resembled a halberd in shape but featured a longer, three-sided spike and a heavier hook that was sharpened on the inside, setting it apart from its English counterpart.

    Guisarme in Europe

    The guisarme was widely used in Europe as a defensive tool against bandits and wild animals and as an aggressive weapon in times of war.

    The weapon is specifically named in the Letter of Discharge (a type of royal diploma issued by the “House of Accounts” in Portugal) of 1455, which was given to officials of the Crown at both the central and local administration levels and tasked with collecting the kingdom’s revenues and managing royal expenses.

    In Pastrana tapestries, the weapon is featured prominently. Despite the guisarme’s reputation as a weapon of the common citizen, these tapestries show Afonso V of Portugal as the sole user of the polearm, which endows it with noble status.

    Guisarme in Popular Culture

    Arno with guisarme, Assassin's Creed Unity.
    Arno with guisarme, Assassin’s Creed Unity.

    Guisarme is featured in many movies, anime, TV shows, and video games. The weapon is featured most in detail in video games:

    • The Witcher 2: Assassin’s Of Kings (2011)
    • Gloria Victis (2016)
    • Kingdom Come: Deliverance (2018)
    • Mordhau (2019) (Also see: Mordhau: The Murder Stroke)
    • Assassin’s Creed: Unity (2014)

    Guisarme at a Glance

    What is the origin of the term and its etymology?

    The term “guisarme” originated from the French word wîsarm, which has its roots in the Germanic word wisarme. Another theory suggests its origin as the Old High German word getīsarn, meaning “weeding iron.” These terms likely relate to the production of iron and iron tools through smelting and forging.

    What are the main features of the guisarme’s design?

    It is a pole weapon that combines elements of the spear, billhook, poleaxe, and war hammer. It typically consists of a wooden handle, a curved blade with spikes and a hook, and a pommel with a spearhead. The shaft is usually made of wood, and the blade resembles a poleaxe or billhook. The hook on the blade allows for dismounting riders or disabling their steeds.

    What are the different variants of this weapon?

    There are several variants of the weapon, including the bill-guisarme, voulge-guisarme, and glaive-guisarme. The first variant includes the properties of the bill polearm, featuring a crescent-shaped or hooked blade with a pointed tip. The latter variant resembles a voulge, with a curved or hook-shaped cutting edge and a spear tip. The last variant combines elements of the glaive, featuring a long, single-edged blade with a hook or spike attached to the rear.

    What is the significance of this weapon?

    The guisarme was used both as a defensive tool against bandits and wild animals and as an aggressive weapon in times of war. Its versatility made it popular among the common citizens, and it was often employed in rural areas of Europe from the 12th century to the 19th century. The weapon’s agricultural origins, coupled with its military capabilities, made it a cost-effective and practical weapon during a time of metal scarcity. Its use is documented in historical events such as the Galician uprisings during the Peninsular War.

  • Koncerz: A Hussar Sword Without a Cutting Edge

    Koncerz: A Hussar Sword Without a Cutting Edge

    The cavalry of the 15th through the 18th centuries often utilized a sword variant called the koncerz, a one-handed cold weapon. The long, thin blade is a defining feature of the koncerz, and it is one of the most unique historical swords. Despite its obviously Eastern provenance, some linguists trace the word “koncerz” back to the Latin contus, meaning a pole or thin projectile. However, a stronger etymological tie exists with the Tatar “khanjar” in medieval weaponry, which means “dagger”.

    Koncerz
    Type of weapon:Sword
    Other names:Occasionally, estoc
    Origin:Eastern Europe, Turkic
    Distribution:Turkey, Hungary, Poland, Lithuania
    Total length:50-63″ (1.5-1.6 m)
    Weight:2.5–4.5 lb (1–2 kg)

    The koncerz became a distinctive weapon for the hussars during the 16th century. This sword featured a potentially four-sided blade, incorporating a central spine edge. It could have a narrow, square-shaped base or a diamond-shaped configuration, and later variations even introduced a three-sided design. The Turkic people may have taken the idea of this weapon from a similar Chinese weapon.

    The Slavs adopted the koncerz from the Turkic peoples.

    Koncerz’s Description

    Koncerz sword
    Koncerz. (Bechamel, Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported)

    The koncerz resembled a longsword in many respects, and it is one of the lesser-known Renaissance swords. It had a long blade, which was often from 60 to 70 inches (1.5 to 1.8 m) in length, with a triangular or quadrilateral cross-section.

    This section was less frequently lenticular, flat, or prismatic with concave sides. The standard koncerz was used with just one hand, but there was also a two-handed version known as estoc.

    Koncerz sword at number 20, from Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary (1890--1907).
    Koncerz sword at number 20, from Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary (1890–1907).

    Only a few original examples of the weapon have survived, and sword enthusiasts and collectors are the owners of them. One of them is displayed in Poland, in the Czartoryski Museum in Krakow. This is perhaps due to the blade’s length and relatively narrow cross-section, making the weapon prone to fracture compared to other combat swords.

    There are many instances of combined edged weapons among the European blades and swords, such as the Bec de Corbin or the Lucerne hammer. And some versions of koncerz were designed to allow cavalry to fire a pistol while charging with the sword on horseback. But the weight of such a combined arm raises questions about its usefulness.

    A Polish video showcases the sword in detail at 3:25 and 4:25.

    The weapon’s handle went through many iterations. Originally, it featured an egg-shaped knob and an S- or 8-shaped grip. Later, a guard plate was mounted to the grip, and the crossbars were angled inward, closer to the blade.

    The use of saber handles became widespread beginning in the late 16th century. These later models abandoned the medieval crossguard in favor of a saber-like guard.

    Koncerz with crossbars angled inward, from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
    Koncerz with crossbars angled inward, from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. (Hungarian National Museum)

    Examples of Western spade handles appeared by the end of the 17th century. The first known portrayal of this weapon dates back to 1540 when it appeared on the coat of arms. Quickly adopted by the Turks, even Hassán Bey’s (1532–1532) elaborate koncerz hilt survived. It didn’t take long before it spread to Polish and Russian soil.

    Origin of the Koncerz

    The etymological Turkic origin of the name refers to an Eastern European origin for the sword. However, it is unclear where this weapon first arose.

    The name “koncerz” appears earliest in history in the legends of the Battle of Kulikovo (1380). However, the Russian horse army never really adopted them. The name of this sword also appears in the Old Hungarian text “Besztercei szójegyzék,” which was compiled in 1395.

    The koncerz sword originated among the Turkic peoples, who encountered European opponents with thick protective armor during battles. It was later adopted by medieval countries, including Kievan Rus’, and became particularly popular in the heavy cavalry of Poland. The koncerz was in use from the 12th century until the end of the 18th century.

    Koncerz swords

    The koncerz, like other Renaissance-era cavalry swords made in the Balkans, was very definitely adapted from an Ottoman Turk weapon.

    The earliest examples in Polish arsenals date back to the 14th century, and they likely entered Europe through the Kingdom of Hungary. However, they were still unfinished items. The weapon didn’t reach its full form until the 16th century, making it a significant asset to the winged hussars of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.

    Since the only way to wound a soldier in metal armor was to stab through the gaps in the armor, swords were modified from slashing weapons to stabbing weapons. The koncerz was derived from swords with such narrow blades.

    The faceted blade was superior to the flat one because it could be made longer without increasing its weight.

    The 15th century saw the appearance of koncerz in Turkey, Hungary, and the borderlands between France and Germany. Turkish, Hungarian—the most common kind was Polish—and Western European were the three distinct varieties of koncerz.

    It wasn’t until the 14th and 16th centuries, with the advent of metallurgy and knightly armor, that a chopping sword was made nearly useless on the battlefield. To break through the armor, three to five chopping hits were required, which was only possible in a one-on-one battle.

    The situation got so dire that weaponsmiths began seeking alternatives. This may be observed in the creation of “armor-piercing” swords such as the estoc and the Polish-Lithuanian koncerz sword.

    In the 17th century, “granatami” referred to a kind of Polish koncerz with a smaller sword hilt and triangular blade.

    Because of the high demand, Hungarian swordsmiths had to outsource koncerz production, leading to a proliferation of South German factories producing this sword, some of which had Italian and Spanish blades.

    The Hungarian cavalry also utilized the sword during the War of Independence (1703–-1711) led by Francis II Rákóczi. Eight koncerz were discovered in a 1708 inventory.

    Koncerz’s History

    Koncerz swords, probably of ceremonial origin, before 1853.
    Koncerz swords, probably of ceremonial origin, before 1853. (Image)

    The first koncerz were used in the 14th and 15th centuries and were very similar to traditional swords. Their length was about 50 inches (1.3 m), with a straight crossguard and a sword hilt.

    However, in the 16th and 17th centuries, they became lighter and practically adapted only to stabbing. This version of the weapon was up to 63 inches (1.6 m) long—almost as long as some spadone—with a half-open hilt (a hilt that partially covers the hand) and a spherical pommel.

    Only employed on horseback, this weapon was designed to counter soldiers equipped with polearms, such as the lance or the ahlspiess. The soldiers did not carry it around their waists but attached it to the right or left side of the saddle, on the rider’s knee. Often, it was used as a “spare spear”. Most often, the spear was used for the first attack, followed by the koncerz.

    According to French geographer Guillaume de Beauplan, when the fighting became tough, the hussars would wield koncerz of at least 5 feet in length to finish off the fallen foes.

    And the rider would employ this sword in situations where the rider’s lance was broken or when there was limited space to gather enough momentum for a charge.

    In Poland and Hungary, light cavalry units and hussars used koncerz, which were similar to hussar sabers but had closed hilts (a hilt that fully covers the hand).

    Thus, it was technically among the knight’s weapons.

    The koncerz of Hungary and Western Europe were designed for use only in battle, whereas the weapons of Turkish origin were used primarily for ceremonial reasons—with their elaborate ornamentation, sword accessories, and blade craftsmanship.

    Light mercenary cavalry in the Polish imperial army often used koncerz in addition to sabers. These mercenaries included the Hungarian (hussars) and Polish (lisowczyks, “lost men”) cavalry units.

    In conflicts against the Turks, the koncerz proved effective at penetrating their chain mail. The larger blade of this weapon made it useful for combat against a saber as well.

    Stibor of Stiboricz (a Polish aristocrat in the Kingdom of Hungary), who was buried in 1414, is shown on his gravestone with a koncerz strapped to his right side.

    Polish winged hussars carried the koncerz alongside the saber and used it in the event of a broken spear.

    According to a 1721 Hungarian coat of arms, the koncerz was not gripped in a fist, but rather the handle was supported in the palm by the index and middle fingers.

    Hungarian hussars serving in France were said to “bend over the horse’s head when stabbing and use the sword to stab the enemy by leaning the sword against their knee” in Histoire de la Milice Françoise (1721).

    The kanchar appears in the historical records of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the second half of the 16th century. They went out of use in the 18th century.

    The Holy Roman Empire‘s regular hussars used koncerz, which was forged of the finest steel and cost nearly six times as much as the saber stipulated by the Charter. In Europe, the weapon gained a reputation as a noble sword.

    The Functionality of the Weapon

    When driven with its pointed end, the koncerz could pierce the Turkish chain mail, behteret (an Eastern armor), and baidana (a chain mail with flat iron rings), as well as the thick, quilted cotton kaftans worn by Tatar horsemen during the battles in Eastern Europe.

    The two-handed estoc, created to pierce through armor with great power, has grown popular in Western Europe. The German name of this weapon, Panzerstecher (i.e., “armor piercer”), provides secondary evidence (in Vladimir Brnardic’s The Imperial Armies of the Thirty Years’ War 1618–1648 (2): Cavalry) for the mentioned use of koncerz above.

    However, it was not an effective weapon for slashing since the blade was very thin and had no cutting edges. Therefore, it required great swordsmanship and the utilization of certain swordfighting techniques to use this weapon in battle.

    And the claims by the Polish historian of literature Henryk Markiewicz that the weapon could be used effectively as a heavy cavalry cutting weapon in combat can be disregarded as pure fiction.

    These quotes below exemplify instances where the koncerz sword was portrayed as ineffective against certain types of chain armor, as described in various books:

    1. “…he felt that the koncerz slipped in cutting through Babinicz’s misiurka [a chain-plate helmet].”
      (The Deluge, vol. 3, chapter XXI).
    2. “He struck me in the head with a koncerz and brought me down. [He is surviving]”
      (The Deluge, vol. 2, chapter XL).
    3. “…Skrzetuski attacked the enraged Tugay Bey and smashed his head with a koncerz (…), perhaps the Damascus-forged misiurka could withstand the blow, but the blade curled on impact and shattered into small pieces.”
      (With Fire and Sword, vol. 2, chapter XXIV).
    4. “…a gigantic hussar… stands in the stirrups to strike more forcefully, and with a terrifying swing, he brings down the koncerz blade upon the aged head (…) and Kiaja, almost cut in half to his shoulders, falls…” (Colonel Wolodyjowski, Epilogue).

    The Koncerz Sword at a Glance

    What is the origin of the Koncerz sword?

    The weapon first emerged in the 15th century and was used in Turkey, Hungary, and the borderlands between France and Germany. There were three distinct varieties of the sword: Turkish, Hungarian, and Western European.

    How was the Koncerz sword used in battle?

    Hussars and cavalry units used the weapon primarily. It was strapped beneath the saddle of a horse, ready to be employed when the rider’s lance was broken or in situations where there was limited space for a charge. It was designed to counter soldiers equipped with polearms and could effectively pierce various types of armor worn by opponents.

    What were the characteristics of the Koncerz sword?

    The weapon had a long blade, typically ranging from 60 to 70 inches (1.5 to 1.8 m) in length, with a triangular or quadrilateral cross-section. It featured a half-open hilt, a spherical pommel, and a thin blade without cutting edges, making it less effective for slashing attacks.

    Were there any limitations or drawbacks to the Koncerz sword?

    Due to its relatively narrow cross-section and lengthy blade, the sword was prone to fracture compared to other combat swords. Its effectiveness relied heavily on the skill and swordsmanship of the wielder, as it required precise techniques and thrusting movements to be effective in battle.