Author: Hrothsige Frithowulf

  • El Cid: The Legendary Spanish Knight

    El Cid: The Legendary Spanish Knight

    In medieval Spain, Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar was a Castilian knight and warlord. He fought with both Christian and Muslim forces, earning him the Arabic accolade “El Cid” and the Spanish name “El Campeador”. In 1040, he entered the world in the town of Vivar, not far from the city of Burgos. According to the saying, on June 10, 1099, El Cid was atop the battlements protecting Valencia when he was shot by a stray arrow, and his death was recounted in this way by the Latin Chronicon Malleacense (although it is most likely that he died due to natural causes): “In Spain, at Valentia, Count Rodericus died, for which there was great mourning for the Christians and joy for the pagan enemies.

    Despite his later reputation as a champion for the Reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula and a national hero, El Cid submitted to the authority of both Christian and Muslim rulers at various points in his life. Instead of fighting for a higher cause, he fought for himself, making him what some writers call a “mercenary,” or a professional soldier who does so in return for payment.

    For his personal gain, Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar served as an armed mercenary for many warlords.

    El Cid was a courageous knight

    el cid 2
    El Cid (1040-1099) ordered the execution of an enemy. 19th-century drawing. Image credit: Granger, Fine Art America.

    By defeating the Navarrese knight Jimeno of Pamplona in a single encounter to resolve the dominance of several border castles that the kings of Castile and Navarre were battling over, Rodrigo gained even more status as a royal lieutenant in the court of King Sancho II.

    In spite of his animosity towards Rodrigo Díaz following the Battles of Llantada (1068) and Golpejera (1072), which resulted in the new monarch being forced to seek refuge in the Muslim court, Alfonso VI, who succeeded Sancho II after his death in the Siege of Zamora, honored him by giving him the hand of Lady Jimena Díaz, apparently the daughter of Count Diego Fernández and a relative of the monarch himself.

    Alfonso VI showed Rodrigo respect in spite of his animosity by giving him his cousin Jimena as a bride.

    The ways of El Cid

    After a Muslim invasion of the Castle of Gormaz, “El Cid” had one of his most memorable occurrences (Soria). As soon as Rodrigo Diaz heard the news, he assembled his troops and marched into the Kingdom of Toledo to look for the perpetrators. But King Alfonso’s intentions were derailed by Rodrigo’s sudden move, and so he exiled him.

    buy tadalista online https://fasteruc.com/occupational-health-services/html/tadalista.html no prescription pharmacy

    When King Alfonso VI of León was fighting for territory in Toledo without Rodrigo’s assistance in 1081, the Muslims invaded Gormaz (Soria) unexpectedly and won a decisive victory, taking a considerable amount of loot with them. When Rodrigo Diaz heard the news, he went straight to work looking for the perpetrators rather than waiting for instructions from the monarch. Rodrigo’s activities in Toledo, the city from which he returned with as many as 7,000 prisoners (including men and women), thwarted King Alfonso’s efforts to peacefully annex this land. The monarch’s sentence of exile did not include the confiscation of the knight’s possessions.

    El Cid was exiled twice

    The count of Vivar agreed to aid Al-Muqtadir, King of Zaragoza, in his conflict with his brother Al-Mundir, King of Lérida, Tortosa, and Denia, despite the fact that the counts of Barcelona and Ramón Berenguer II had all refused Rodrigo Díaz’s assistance. In 1082, Rodrigo Díaz won a decisive victory against Berenguer Ramon II at Almenar. Two years later, in 1084, he beat the Aragonese ruler and an Islamic force Al-Mundir, near Morella. During this time, Rodrigo Díaz earned the name “El Cid,” which came from the Arabic term sid, meaning “lord.”

    Rodrigo earned the moniker “El Cid” when he defeated Berenguer Ramon II and Al-Mundir during his first exile.

    The year 1086 was a turning point in the narrative of the Iberian Peninsula. It is believed that a sizable Almoravid army crossed the Strait of Gibraltar from the Sahara. They claimed to adhere to a strict version of Islam and were prepared to use violence to establish it. When the Almoravids besieged the Murcian citadel of Aledo in November 1088, King Alfonso VI enlisted El Cid’s assistance in breaking the siege. The Alicante region of Villena was scheduled to be the meeting site for the armies of Alfonso and El Cid, but for whatever reason, the two armies never really met.

    The epitome of the mercenary

    Because of his pivotal role in the so-called Reconquest of the Iberian Peninsula, El Cid is celebrated as a national hero. A real mercenary, however, he battled for his own interests throughout his life, sometimes on the Christian side and sometimes on the Muslim side.

    El Cid camped out at Elche, where he was informed that King Alfonso, angry that he had not gotten the desired assistance, had labeled him a traitor. This was the lowest point of a knight’s life, and the punishment was death or exile.

    buy mounjaro online https://fasteruc.com/occupational-health-services/html/mounjaro.html no prescription pharmacy

    From that point on, the Cid led Levante based on his own self-interest as an autonomous leader. He assumed the dominion of the whole Levant in 1090.

    After Alfonso VI’s death, the Taifa monarch of Toledo and Valencia, Al-Qadir, began making tax payments to El Cid. El Cid expelled the Catalan count from the Levantine territory after defeating a coalition led by Al-Mundir and Berenguer Ramón II in 1090 at the Battle of Tevar.

    Conquest of Valencia

    Meanwhile, in the summer of 1092, Alfonso VI advanced on Tortosa (then a tributary of El Cid) and Valencia itself, forming an alliance with the King of Aragon, the Count of Barcelona, and the towns of Pisa and Genoa, whose respective men and ships participated in the operation. However, the grand scheme ultimately failed, and Alfonso VI was soon forced to return to Castile from Valencia. At the same time, El Cid, who was in Zaragoza seeking an alliance with the King of the Taifa, launched a severe expedition into La Rioja as revenge.

    buy singulair online https://fasteruc.com/occupational-health-services/html/singulair.html no prescription pharmacy

    In the years that followed, Ibn Jahhaf, the man who would later kill Al-Qadir, led relentless operations to seize Valencia. Cid encircled the city in 1093, and conditions there quickly deteriorated. After a year-long siege in which El Cid’s army utilized war machines to severely damage the city walls, Valencia ultimately surrendered on June 17, 1094, when El Cid declared himself “Prince Rodrigo el Campeador.”

    But the Almoravids didn’t give up, and in September of that year, a force led by Muhammad ibn Tashfin reached Quart de Poblet, only five kilometers from the capital, and besieged it, only to be soundly destroyed by the Cid.

    During his reign as Prince Rodrigo el Campeador, the El Cid took control of Valencia in 1094.

    el cid Charlton Heston
    El Cid in the movies: This 1961 Italian-American co-production “El Cid” movie stars Sofia Loren and Charlton Heston as Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar. It was directed by Anthony Mann. There were three Oscar nominations for the movie.

    Jimena, El Cid’s spirited widow, kept the local resistance going for two more years after her husband’s death, until they finally capitulated to the Muslim onslaught. She took El Cid’s body with her when she fled Valencia, and buried him at the monastery of Cardea. After many trials and tribulations, El Cid’s bones were reinterred in the Cathedral of Burgos, where his grave can still be seen today.

  • The Complete List of the Emperors of the Roman Empire

    The Complete List of the Emperors of the Roman Empire

    The Roman Empire, or Imperium Romanum in Latin, refers to the political and military entity that existed on ancient Roman territory from 27 BC to 476 AD. Wars, power struggles, and acts of treachery shaped the history of the Roman Empire and were inextricably related to the list of Roman emperors. There were a number of Roman emperors that came one after the other, and some of them left more of an imprint on history than others throughout this time.

    JULIO-CLAUDIAN DYNASTY


    Augustus: The First Roman Emperor

    • Julio-Claudian Dynasty
    • Grand-nephew and adopted son of Julius Caesar
    • Reign: 27 to 14 BC

    Augustus, formerly known as Octavian, was born in Rome in 63 BC and became the first emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty because of his thirst for revenge over Caesar’s assassination (he was the grand-nephew and adopted son of Julius Caesar). In order to achieve this, Augustus created the Second Triumvirate with Mark Antony and Lepidus. The Principate of Augustus was soon founded when Augustus turned against his erstwhile friends (during the Battle of Actium). On January 16, 27 BC, he was proclaimed Emperor and served in that capacity until 14 AD.

    Tiberius: The Emperor Exiled to Capri

    • Julio-Claudian Dynasty
    • Son-in-law and adopted son of Augustus
    • Reign: 14 to 37 AD

    Tiberius, the adopted son and son-in-law of Augustus, ascended the throne of the Roman Empire in 14 AD and ruled until his death in 37 AD. A member of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, Tiberius made a name for himself in the military field. For most of the decade Tiberius was in charge of crucial campaigns, mostly in Germania. His reign was interspersed with political and economic changes. Upon the death of his son Drusus II, Tiberius voluntarily went into exile on Capri Island. On this island he dismissed and later killed a governor who had previously tried to overthrow him.

    Caligula: A Tyrannical Emperor

    • Julio-Claudian Dynasty
    • Great grandson of Augustus and son of Germanicus
    • Reign: 37 to 41 AD

    The Roman emperor Caligula was the son of Germanicus and a great-grandson of Augustus. He was the third ruler of the Roman Empire and a member of the powerful Julio-Claudian family. Caligula ruled Rome and its empire from 37 to 41. His reputation as a cruel ruler was cemented over those four years. Throughout his reign, Caligula would not hesitate to have his closest associates murdered, and he had a deep-seated animosity against the Senate. Caligula was killed at Rome in 41 by a gang of praetorians, who believed he was either ill or mad.

    Claudius: Who Became Emperor by Chance

    • Julio-Claudian Dynasty
    • Nephew of Tiberius and uncle of Caligula
    • Reign: 41 to 54 AD

    Claudius was the only person who could have been emperor after Caligula. He took power at 41 and stayed in charge until 54. He was the first emperor to be born somewhere other than Italy, but he was also part of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Claudius was Tiberius’ nephew and Caligula’s uncle. Claudius was able to get some political projects done (like expanding the Empire and taking over Brittany), but it was harder for him to find love. Before he died in 54, he had his third wife, Messalina, killed. His death was blamed on his fourth wife, Agrippina the Younger, who then put her son, Nero, on the throne.

    Nero: An Emperor Turned Despot

    • Julio-Claudian Dynasty
    • Grand-nephew and adopted son of Claudius
    • Reign: 54 to 68 AD

    As the final member of the Julio-Claudian line to claim the title of Roman emperor, Nero became a totalitarian ruler. Claudius adopted him as a son, making him his grandnephew. During his reign from 54 to 68 AD, numerous significant events occurred, including the murder of his mother Agrippina (and the suspicion of the assassination of his brother Britannicus), persecutions of Christians, and the rebuilding of the Domus Aurea after the destruction of Rome in 64 AD. Poppaea Sabina’s husband of ten years, Nero, killed himself in 68 AD after being removed from power.

    What Happened in the Year of the Four Emperors

    • Four emperors: Galba, Othon, Vitellius, Vespasian
    • Year 68 AD

    Following Nero’s death in 68 CE, four new emperors ruled the Roman Empire that year (hence the name, “Year of the Four Emperors“). Successors Galba, Otto, and Vitellius ruled the Roman Empire in turn until Vespasian arrived to put an end to the civil wars. War and conflict among the many armies do occur during the Year of the Four Emperors.

    FLAVIAN DYNASTY


    Vespasian: A Reforming Emperor

    • Flavian Dynasty
    • Originated from the plebs
    • Reign: 69 to 79 AD

    In 69, Vespasian restored order to the Roman Empire and became the first Emperor of the Flavian Dynasty. Originally from the plebs, Vespasian enjoyed the image of a reforming emperor, with a whole series of fiscal and legislative reforms undertaken. We owe him, among other things, the introduction of a tax on urine, Pecunia non olet. Vespasian was also responsible for the construction of the Colosseum, which was completed in 80 during the reign of his son Titus. Vespasian died in 79, having been ill for a decade.

    Titus: The Emperor Who Conquered Jerusalem

    • Flavian Dynasty
    • Son of Vespasian
    • Reign: 79 to 81 AD

    Titus, the son of Vespasian and a member of the Flavian dynasty, succeeded to the throne following his father’s death in 79. Titus, unlike his father, reigned as Roman Emperor for just two years. In the span of two years, the Romans conquered Jerusalem and massacred the Jews (Titus, on the other hand, had plans for the Jewish Princess Berenice) and Mount Vesuvius erupted, destroying the city of Pompeii. We don’t know what killed Titus in 81, although it was either disease or poison.

    Domitian: The Last of the Flavians

    • Flavian Dynasty
    • Son of Vespasian
    • Reign: 81 to 96 AD

    Brother of the emperor Titus, Domitian was the last ruler of the Roman Empire from the Flavian dynasty. Domitian, like his father Vespasian, extended the average length of a Roman emperor’s rule to over 10 years (from 81 to 96 AD). Domitian was typically seen as a dictator who did not hesitate to remove the opponents of the state from Rome, while being at the origin of many political choices (the growth of the Roman economy, the wars of Agricola, etc.).

    NERVA–ANTONINE DYNASTY


    Nerva: An Advisor Who Became Emperor

    • Dynasty of the Antonine
    • Advisor to Nero and Flavian
    • Reign: 96 to 98 AD

    Nerva, who had served as Nero’s adviser and later that of the other members of the Flavian dynasty, ascended to the throne in 96 and ruled until 98. He established his own dynasty, the Antonine. In the face of financial woes and a lack of support from the Roman military, Nerva was soon pressured into naming a successor. Following his adoption of Trajan, he died a few months later of natural causes. Historians emphasize Nerva’s ability to facilitate a peaceful transfer of power.

    Trajan: The Best of the Roman Emperors

    • Antonine Dynasty
    • Adopted son of Nerva
    • Reign: 98 to 117 AD

    The Roman historian Tacitus called Trajan “the greatest of the Roman emperors” since his name was synonymous with the empire’s greatest victories and its greatest growth. Trajan was a member of the Antonine dynasty and Nerva’s adoptive son. During his reign from 98 to 117, Trajan fought many battles against the Dacians in Armenia and Mesopotamia with the help of the Roman Army. With the money he amassed in these campaigns, he helped build several structures, including Trajan’s Forum, home to the world-famous Trajan column.

    Hadrian: A Scholarly Emperor

    • Antonine Dynasty
    • Adopted son of Trajan
    • Reign: 117 to 138 AD

    The Roman emperor Hadrian, a member of the Antonine dynasty and the adoptive son of Trajan, ruled from AD 117 to 138. The philosophical and literary Hadrian ended the imperial expansion strategy of his predecessor, Trajan. He was remembered as a peaceful ruler who oversaw the construction of several structures, including the wall that bears his name (Hadrian’s Wall). Hadrian faced the Jewish uprising known as the Bar Kokhba revolt during his reign.

    Antoninus Pius: An Emperor of Consolidation

    • Antonine Dynasty
    • Adopted son of Hadrian
    • Reign: 138 to 161 AD

    Antoninus Pius, the adoptive son of Hadrian, served as a magistrate for a very long time. He held the offices of quaestor, praetor, consul, and proconsul of Asia before he was finally elevated to the throne as Emperor. The second-longest reigning Roman emperor after Augustus, he took pride in his Nîmes heritage (Antoninus Pius reigned from 138 until his death in 161). Antoninus Pius, a member of the Antonine dynasty, like his predecessor, left a mark of his passing by having a wall built in his honor (The Antonine Wall).

    Marcus Aurelius: Philosopher Emperor

    • Antonine Dynasty
    • Son-in-law and adopted son of Antoninus
    • Reign: 161 to 180 AD

    The concept of a philosopher emperor is often used when referring to Marcus Aurelius, the final emperor of the Pax Romana. The founder of Stoicism and author of “Meditations,” Marcus Aurelius, was faced with the horrors of battle. Along with being Antoninus’ son-in-law, Aurelius was also Antoninus’ adoptive son. Wars with the Parthian Empire and the Marcomannic Wars occurred during his reign (161–180). Emperor Aurelius, a member of the Antonine dynasty, made the unprecedented choice not to adopt an heir before his death in 180.

    Lucius Verus: Co-emperor

    • Antonine Dynasty
    • Adopted son of Antoninus and son-in-law of Marcus Aurelius
    • Reign: 161 to 169 AD

    It was possible for the Roman Empire to have two emperors at once at various points throughout its history. This occurred between the years 161 and 169, when Lucius Aurelius Verus (whose father was also named Lucius Aelius) served as co-emperor with Marcus Aurelius. Lucius Verus, a major player in the Parthian conflict, fought the Germanic Marcomanni on the Danube River a few months before his own demise. As the adoptive son of Antoninus and the son-in-law of Marcus Aurelius, Verus was also a member of the Antonine dynasty.

    Commodus: A Bloodthirsty Emperor

    • Antonine Dynasty
    • Son of Marcus Aurelius
    • Reign: 180 to 192 AD

    Commodus (born Lucius Aurelius Commodus) was a brutal, dictatorial, and bloodthirsty Roman Emperor. He was the son of Marcus Aurelius and a member of the Antonine dynasty. Avidius Cassius prevented him from becoming dictator. In “Gladiator,” Commodus was the target of many assassination attempts after he was falsely accused of killing his own father. After Lucilla’s scheme was foiled, it was Commodus’ slave, Narcissus, who killed the emperor in the context of a new conspiracy.

    Year of the Five Emperors

    • Five emperors: Pertinax, Didius Julianus, Pescennius Niger, Clodius Albinus, and Septimius Severus
    • Year 193 AD

    Soon after Commodus’ death, the Roman Empire entered a fresh era of turmoil known as the Year of the Five Emperors. Pertinax was deposed shortly after being proclaimed emperor on January 1, 193, and his position was taken by Didius Julianus. He was removed from his position as emperor due to widespread disapproval among Roman citizens, the Senate, and the Army. Septimius Severus, Pescennius Niger, and Clodius Albinus were imposed by the Roman troops into a civil war. The victor, Severus, took the throne as the 21st Roman Emperor after defeating all other challengers.

    SEVERAN DYNASTY


    Septimius Severus: Founder of the Severan Dynasty

    • Severan Dynasty
    • Libyan origins, Rome’s first African Emperor
    • Reign: 193 to 211 AD

    After prevailing in the civil war that erupted during the Year of the Five Emperors, Septimius Severus established the Severan dynasty as a continuation of the Antonine and was declared Emperor by his troops (r. 193 to 211). Even though Severus set up a hereditary monarchy, the Libyan emperor nevertheless had to deal with succession disputes at the end of his life. Rome’s first African Emperor, Septimius Severus died in 211, perhaps from poisoning by his own son Caracalla, who replaced him alongside another son, Geta.

    Caracalla: A Military Tyrant

    • Severan Dynasty
    • Son of Septimius Severus
    • Reign: from 211 to 217 AD

    Beginning in the year 211, Caracalla, the younger brother of Geta and the son of Septimius Severus, ruled the Roman Empire with an iron fist. Caracalla, inspired by Alexander the Great, had his brother killed and then led an army against the Germans and the Parthians. His atrocities in Alexandria bolstered his reputation as a military despot. Caracalla, before his death in 217, made the decision to issue the Edict of Caracalla, which declared all free males in the Roman Empire to be citizens.

    Macrinus: Unpopular Usurper

    • Severan Dynasty
    • Native of Mauretania (Africa), overthrew Caracalla
    • Reign: from 217 to 218 AD

    After plotting Caracalla’s murder, Macrinus took over as Caracalla’s successor as prefect of the Praetorium. Macrinus, the first emperor to be from the equestrian aristocracy and a native of African Mauritania, was not a very successful ruler (217–218). After the monetary changes caused him to lose favor with the Roman soldiers, Macrinus attempted to leave the city of Antioch to join the Roman soldiers. He and his son co-emperor Diadumenian were both taken prisoner at the same time. Macrinus was put to death for trying to escape in the year 218.

    Elagabalus: The Child of Many Vices

    • The Severan Dynasty
    • Nephew of Caracalla
    • Reign: 218 to 222 AD

    Elagabalus (also known as Heliogabalus) was just 14 years old when he replaced Macrinus as ruler of the Severan in 218. He was the nephew of Caracalla. He gave some authority to his grandmother and mother, who influenced him. Elagabalus’ promotion of sun worship (hence the name Heliogabalus) and his role in the decision to transport the famed black stone of Emesa (a piece of meteorite) to Rome left an indelible mark on the empire’s history. He was killed by the mob and thrown into the Tiber River in the year 222 at the age of 18 years old.

    Severus Alexander: The Emperor Murdered by His Troops

    • Severan Dynasty
    • Cousin of Elagabalus
    • Reign: 222 to 225 AD

    Severus Alexander, Elagabalus’ cousin and the final emperor of the Severan dynasty, ruled over a dull empire from 222 to 225. He tried to return the black stone to Emesa in an effort to impress his mother, Julia Mamaea, and so win over the favor of certain Romans. He was not a military expert and therefore, despite his reforms helping the poor, he became unpopular. After just three years in power, Emperor Severus Alexander died. He was likely assassinated by his own troops, who had criticized his pacifism. It was with his death that the military chaos began.

    CRISIS OF THE THIRD CENTURY


    Which Emperors Succeeded During the Crisis of the Third Century?

    • The Crisis of the Third Century: from 235 to 268 AD.
    • Maximinus Thrax: declared by his soldiers, reigned from 235 to 238 AD.
    • Gordian I: appointed by his soldiers, reigned from March to April 238 AD.
    • Gordian II: son of Gordian I, from March to April 238 AD.
    • Pupienus and Balbinus: appointed by the Senate, reigned from April to July 238 AD.
    • Gordian III: nephew of Gordian II, reigned from 238 to 244 AD.
    • Philip the Arab: named by his soldiers, reigned from 244 to 249 AD.
    • Decius: named by his soldiers, reigned from 249 to 251 AD.
    • Trebonianus Gallus: appointed by his soldiers, reigned from 251 to 253 AD.
    • Valerian: appointed by his soldiers, reigned from 253 to 260 AD.
    • Gallienus: son of Valerian, from 253 to 268 AD.

    The death of Severus Alexander was often seen as the beginning of the Crisis of the Third Century (also known as the “Military Anarchy”) a period that lasted for 33 years. Between the years 235 and 268, a slew of Roman emperors came and went, with the military often intervening and attempting to seize power. The Army was responsible for the deaths of several emperors. Maximinus Thrax (reign of 235–238), Gordian I (reign of March to April 238), Philip the Arab (reign of 244–249), Decius (reign of 249–251), Valerian (reign of 253–260), or Gallienus (reign of 253–263) all ruled during this time, coinciding with the list of the Thirty Tyrants (reign of 253–268).

    The Illyrian Emperors Who Tried to Put an End to the Crisis of the Third Century

    • Illyrian emperors: from 268 to 285
    • Claudius II (Claudius Gothicus): named by Gallien, reigned from 268 to 270
    • Quintillus: Brother of Claudius II, reigned from August to October 270
    • Aurelian: declared by his soldiers, reigned from 270 to 275
    • Marcus Claudius Tacitus: appointed by the Senate, reigned from 275 to 276
    • Florianus: half-brother of Marcus Claudius Tacitus, reigned from June to September 276
    • Probus: appointed by his soldiers, reigned from 276 to 282
    • Carus: appointed by his soldiers, reigned from 282 to 283
    • Numerian: son of Carus and brother of Carinus, reigned from 283 to 284
    • Carinus: son of Carus and brother of Numerian, reigned from 284 to 285

    Between the years 268 and 285, many Illyrian emperors tried to put a stop to the Crisis of the Third Century. From Illyria, Claudius II the Goth (268–270), Quintillus (August–October 270), Aurelian (270–275), Probus (276–282), and even Carinus (284–285) all tried to resolve the problem of the late third century. Within a few months of taking control, the Roman military killed numerous civilians. But the dilemma of the Third Century was not resolved until Diocletian took power in 284.

    TETRARCHY


    Diocletian: The Founder of the Tetrarchy

    • Tetrarchy Period
    • Defeat of Carinus at the Battle of the Margus
    • Reign: 285 to 305

    Diocletian, who became Emperor in 284, oversaw the conclusion of the crises that plagued the early third century and inaugurated the First Tetrarchy (a mode of government that allowed the emperor to delegate the governance of the Empire to counter invasions). After defeating Carinus at the Battle of the Margus, Diocletian quickly instituted a new government based on shared authority. Diocletian issued the Edict of Maximum Prices in 301, one of the numerous fruitless efforts he made to stabilize the Roman currency. The Great Persecution and the persecution of Christians also occurred during this time.

    Maximian Herculius: The Fighting Emperor

    • Tetrarchy Period
    • Appointed by Diocletian
    • Reign: 285 to 305

    Maximian Herculius, who was the second emperor of the First Tetrarchy, was one of those emperors who led a lot of military campaigns. During his reign, which started in 285 AD, he worked to stop the Germanic invasion and get rid of the Bagaudae rebel threat in Gaul. Maximian Herculius, the father of Maxentius, put on a usurper’s costume the year after Diocletian asked him to step down in 305. He tried several times to obtain power again before being forced to commit suicide in 310.

    Galerius: The Guarantor of Diocletian’s Legacy

    • Tetrarchy Period
    • Appointed by Diocletian
    • Reign: 293 to 311 AD

    Galerius, who came from a military family, was a staunch supporter of the Tetrarchy and a direct successor to Diocletian. Beginning in 293, Galerius made use of the established protocol to rule as Roman Emperor in the East. Galerius swiftly surpassed Severus and Maximinus Daza as the most important figures in the Roman Empire. Sadly, he only had time to issue the Edict of Serdica before his death in 311. His passing marked the end of the Tetrarchy.

    Constantius Chlorus: The Father of Constantine I

    • Tetrarchy Period
    • Appointed by Diocletian
    • Reign: 293 to 306 AD

    On May 1, 305, Constantius Chlorus replaced Maximian Herculius as Emperor, becoming the second emperor to benefit from the Tetrarchy desired and established by Diocletian. Diocletian appointed him to his position. Before that, in the year 293, he was named Julius Caesar of the Western Empire and took part in the administration of the Roman state with the other tetrarchs. Constantius Chlorus, the father of Constantine I, died of natural causes in 306. He had helped rebuild the ancient city of Autun.

    Tetrarchs of Maximinus Daza, Severus and Maxentius

    • Tetrarchy Period
    • Maximinus Daza: nephew of Galerius, reigned from 305 to 313
    • Severus: general of Galerius, reigned from 305 to 307
    • Maxentius: son of Maximian Herculius, reigned from 306 to 312

    Different tetrarchs succeeded each other for brief periods of time throughout the Tetrarchy period of the Roman Empire. In addition to the aforementioned figures, others including Maximinus Daza, Licinius, Severus, and Maxentius helped protect the Roman Empire before Constantine I came to power. Maxentius, the son of Constantius Chlorus, eliminated the previous tetrarchs before beginning his own 31-year rule (by defeating Maxentius, for example, in 312 at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge).

    Licinius: The Rival of Constantine I

    • Tetrarchy Period
    • Close to Galerius
    • Reign: from 308 to 324 AD

    Co-emperor and personal friend of Galerius, Licinius was a powerful figure in the Tetrarchy. In 308, he was asked to oversee the eastern section of the Roman Empire. Licinius, a close friend of Constantine I, took part in a fratricidal battle between tetrarchs that resulted in the death of Maximinus Daza. He was also on Constantius I’s side when the Edict of Milan was issued in 313. After starting a civil war with a colleague, Constantine I eventually conquered and killed him at the Battle of Adrianople in 324.

    CONSTANTINIAN DYNASTY


    Constantine I: The First Christian Emperor

    • Constantinian Dynasty
    • Son of Constantius Chlorus
    • Reign: 306 to 337 AD

    In 306, Constantine I, son of Constantius Chlorus and a member of the Constantinian dynasty, was named Emperor. He was the final member of the Tetrarchy. He established the Constantinian dynasty after eliminating his rivals for the throne (at the battles of the Milvian Bridge and Andrinople). Through the Edict of Milan in 313, Constantine I ended the persecution of Christians throughout his rule, which lasted until 337. In order to unite the many Christian churches, he called for the First Council at Nicaea in 325, in the midst of his efforts to protect Christianity.

    Constantine II and Constans I: Unfortunate Heirs of Constantine

    • Constantinian Dynasty
    • Constantine II: son of Constantine I, reigned from 337 to 340
    • Constans I: son of Constantine I, reigned from 337 to 350

    After Constantine I’s unexpected death in 337, there was a precarious time of transition. Members of the Constantinian dynasty, including the emperor’s three sons, fought among themselves and killed family members. After the Empire was split in two, the first emperors to go to war with them were Constantine II (337–340) and Constantine I. In the year 340, the second one killed the first one. Magnentius, one of Constantine I’s generals, killed the emperor and thereafter usurped power after Constantine I’s death in 350.

    Constantius II: A Worthy Heir of Constantine

    • Constantinian Dynasty
    • Son of Constantine I
    • Reign: 337 to 361 AD

    After the deaths of his two brothers, Constantius II became the only successor to the throne of the Roman Empire and ruled from 337 to 361. His efforts to fortify the Christian Church were similar to those of his predecessor, Constantine I. To bring the bishops together, he called a council in 353 and held it at Arles. Constantius II picked his opponent Julian as his successor after fending off many usurpation attempts (by Magnentius, Nepotian, Sylvain, etc.) before he died of sickness in 361.

    Julian: The Emperor Who Wished to Restore Paganism

    • Constantinian Dynasty
    • Nephew of Constantine I
    • Reign: 361 to 363 AD

    Constantius II died in 361 and Julian the Apostate, also known as Julian, who served as Caesar from 355 to 361 was named emperor. The Constantinian emperor declared his intention to revive polytheism inside the Roman Empire in 361, despite having been raised as a Christian. The nephew of Constantine I supported paganism as well. In addition, we owe Julian the satirical essay on philosophers named Misopogon (or “Beard-Hater”), written in 363 just before the end of his rule.

    Jovian: A Christian General

    • Constantinian Dynasty
    • General of Julian
    • Reign: 363 to 364 AD

    Constantinian Jovian, who was relatively unknown when he ascended to the throne in 363, was crowned emperor and led the military war against the Sasanian while dressed as a commander. Jovian’s willingness to make peace with Emperor Shapur II was a defining characteristic of his new role. Jovian, a devout Christian and commander under Julian, used his time in power to issue an edict of tolerance similar to that of his predecessor. He died very abruptly in 364 at the young age of 33, only eight short months after becoming Emperor.

    VALENTINIANIC DYNASTY


    Valentinians: The Emperors With a Tragic Fate

    • Valentinianic Dynasty
    • Valentinian I: elected on the death of Jovian, reigned from 364 to 375 AD.
    • Valens: the younger brother of Valentinian I, reigned from 364 to 378 AD.
    • Gratian: eldest son of Valentinian I, reigned from 367 to 383 AD.
    • Valentinian II: the younger son of Valentinian I, reigned from 375 to 392 AD.

    The terrible Valentinianic era begins with Jovian’s demise. The Valentinianic dynasty saw four rulers rule between the years 364 and 392. He ruled from 364 until his death from a stroke in 375. His brother Valens co-ruled with him until his death in 378 at the Battle of Adrianople, and then Gratian governed from 367 until he was defeated and murdered in 383. After his father, Valentinian I, was assassinated while Valentinian II was just four years old, he ruled under the supervision of his mother until his own death by hanging in 392.

    THEODOSIAN DYNASTY


    Magnus Maximus: A Usurper Turned Emperor

    • Theodosian Dynasty
    • The cousin of Theodosius I
    • Reign: 384 to 388 AD

    Magnus Maximus, a cousin of Theodosius I and a member of the Theodosian family, usurped the Roman throne. In 383, as a usurper, he was victorious against Emperor Gratian at the Battle of Lutetia. He was a legendary king of Brittany who Theodosius I recognized as Eastern Emperor in 384 and held that title until 388. Maximus, Theodosius I, and Valentinian II were the three emperors of the Roman Empire during that time. Maximus faced Valentinian II to seize Rome in 387 but was defeated by the coalition of Theodosius I and Valentinian II .

    Theodosius I: The Last Emperor to Rule a Unified Roman Empire

    • Theodosian Dynasty.
    • Magnus Maximus’ cousin.
    • Reign: 379 to 395 AD.

    From 379 to 395, Theodosius I served as Roman Emperor under the name Augustus, which Gratian gave him. Additionally, he was a cousin of Magnus Maximus. It was during his reign that Christianity became the state religion, thanks to his involvement in the Edict of Thessalonica. He ended pagan practices and, in this case, forbade the ancient Olympic Games from being held. It was generally agreed that Theodosius I was the final emperor of the reunified Roman Empire before the Honorius brothers took power.

    After a long period of various Western Roman emperors, a barbarian from Germany named Odoacer deposed Romulus Augustus (reigned 475–476 AD), the last emperor of the Western Roman Empire, and grabbed the throne of Italy, which marked the fall of the Western Roman Empire on September 4, 476 AD.

  • Marie Antoinette: The Last Queen of France

    Marie Antoinette: The Last Queen of France

    Louis XVI’s wife, Marie Antoinette, is remembered as one of France’s most renowned queens. The Revolutionary Tribunal found her guilty of treason and she was executed by guillotine in Paris on October 16, 1793. Marie Antoinette was born on November 2, 1755, in Vienna, Austria. She stoked the flames of animosity with her carefree demeanor and callous disregard for the people’s pain. She fought against the rebels with unsuspected power and bravery, proving herself to be a staunch counter-revolutionary. Also known as “The Austrian” or “Madame Deficit,” she appears to have followed her own road to the scaffold.

    Marie Antoinette, Archduchess of Austria

    Palace of Versailles, Queen's bedroom, bust of Marie Antoinette in 1783.
    Palace of Versailles, Queen’s bedroom, bust of Marie Antoinette in 1783.

    The daughter of Francis of Lorraine and Maria Theresa of Austria, Marie Antoinette was raised and educated by a series of governesses. Her fate was already sealed by her mother, who planned to marry her off to the grandson of Louis XV. She received an education that placed more emphasis on external attractiveness than intellectual development. She perfected her posture, danced and mastered the piano, but for a long time ignored the written word, other languages and history. In contrast to Versailles, he grew up in a less strict atmosphere, free from restrictions and close to nature.

    Louis XVI’s Wedding at Versailles

    In the end, Habsburg Empress Maria Theresa of Austria finally succeeded: The Duke of Choiseul initiated negotiations for the marriage of Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI in order to improve relations between the French monarchy and the Habsburgs by marrying their children to each other. Marie Antoinette was brought to Versailles at the age of 15 to marry the then-very young Dauphin Louis. The year was 1770. The splendid celebrations that followed turned into a nightmare for the people of Paris. More than a hundred people suffocated to death when crowds went wild during a spectacular and costly fireworks display over the city.

    Newly alone and unfamiliar with court life in France, Marie Antoinette spent her fortune on frivolous pursuits and, when her husband abandoned them, quickly fell into a life of excess and frivolity. Among the young aristocracy, she had a clique of social outcasts, the greedy and the immoral. Maria Theresa bombarded the Austrian Ambassador Mercy d’Argenteau and her daughter with a barrage of letters, concerned that her motherly advice and guidance were of little use.

    The Unpopularity of Marie Antoinette

    Marie-Antoinette and Kids.
    Marie Antoinette and Kids.

    The accession to the throne of her husband on May 10, 1774, did not cause Marie Antoinette to reconsider her conduct. However, she did become more dependent on her newfound power to dismiss certain courtiers and ministers at will. It didn’t help that seven years into her marriage, Marie Antoinette still hadn’t produced any heirs for the monarch, and public opinion toward her became more negative in Paris. Multiple rumors circulated regarding her purported affair with the young Swedish lieutenant Axel von Fersen.

    Her first child, a daughter called Marie-Thérèse Charlotte, was born in 1778. Even when she gave birth to the dauphin, Louis Joseph, three years later, the public was still not on her side. Furthermore, Antoinette made no effort to hide her Austrian heritage, which worked against her. Even the derogatory moniker “Austrian” was openly applied to her. Repercussions from the jewelry incident (The Affair of the Diamond Necklace) were still being felt in 1785. Through the Cardinal of Rohan, jewelers Boehmer and Bassange requested 2,000,000 livres ($16.5 million in 2022) from the Queen to pay for a diamond necklace.

    However, Queen Antoinette was not aware of the necklace since it was a gift from Louis XV (her father-in-law) to his mistress. Following the revelation of the scandal, the monarch submitted the matter to Parliament. It was determined that the Count and Countess of La Motte were guilty, but the Cardinal of Rohan and the Count of Cagliostro were innocent.

    The Cardinal of Rohan had been easily deceived by the Countess due to his foolish wish to be close to the Queen. Therefore, Queen Marie Antoinette’s reputation suffered greatly, despite the fact that she was innocent. Because of her declining popularity as a result of this incident, she reduced her expenditures. But the harm had been done; from this point on, she would be held responsible for the poor harvests and dwindling royal treasury.

    “Let them eat brioche!”

    Marie Antoinette was said to say some horrible things about her people. When her people complained that there was not enough bread, she replied, “Let them eat brioche!” This response showed the gap between the well-off and the working poor was widening, which made the situation worrying. This was a distinction that Marie Antoinette would not have understood in respect to these words.

    “Let them eat cake!”

    The fact that brioche was more expensive than bread plays a great role here. This quote, allegedly from a “grand princess,” first appeared in Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Confessions,” written in 1782. And the fact that Marie Antoinette was so unpopular helped to attribute this saying to her. In fact, this phrase seems to be said by Victoire of France, one of Louis XV’s daughters. Moreover, there is no evidence that such a phrase was ever used by Antoinette. Nevertheless, the expression lives on and is often used, sometimes jokingly, as “Let them eat cake.”

    Marie Antoinette Facing the French Revolution

    Marie Antoinette, while still grieving over the loss of her 7-year-old son, the dauphin Louis Joseph, to illness, did not hesitate to urge King Louis XVI to fight the revolutionary forces. The Queen’s pride led her to reject the concessions that La Fayette, Mirabeau, and Barnave, the more moderate figures, offered to her. Because the concept of a constitutional monarchy was abhorrent to Antoinette. Rather than go to her parents, she went to her brothers Joseph II and Leopold II for assistance.

    Marie Antoinette tackled the crisis with grace and fortitude that shocked onlookers. Since the 5th and 6th of October, 1789, the royal family had been imprisoned at the Tuileries. Queen Marie Antoinette, ever the fighter, persuaded her husband to evacuate Paris with their children on June 20, 1791. The group was eventually picked up in the town of Varennes and returned to the capital city under heightened tension.

    The people’s anger for the Queen was reignited when Leopold II, Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, was rumored to be leading an impending war against France. This led to Louis XVI approving the Constitution under pressure on September 14, 1791. The riot of August 10 was sparked by the Brunswick Manifesto, which was published in France on August 1, 1792. The family was taken to Temple Prison when the enraged mob stormed the Tuileries.

    Marie Antoinette in the Conciergerie

    Despite the murders of September 1792, Marie Antoinette was optimistic that her life would be spared. Most of her close friends had been slaughtered and the severed head of the Princess of Lamballe hung outside her window. Her husband was executed after a long trial on January 21, 1793. But Marie Antoinette’s second son, Louis Charles (b. 1785), was taken from her very soon after and used against her.

    They separated Antoinette from her child and took her to the Conciergerie the following month. The trial against her was about to begin. She was buried alive with horrible accusations, but she still insisted on keeping her head high and prayed silently to be spared. Her lawyers’ arguments were irrelevant since the outcome of the trial had already been decided.

    Guillotined, the Feath of Marie Antoinette

    Marie Antoinette was found guilty of treason and sentenced to death at around 4 a.m. on October 16. At the age of 38, on October 16, she submitted herself to the scaffold with all the grace she could muster. One of his shoes was probably lost at some point at the top of the stairs. The Museum of Fine Arts in Caen has acquired this piece.

    With the other, she stepped on the foot of the executioner Henri Sanson and said to him: “Sir, I beg your pardon, I did not do it on purpose,” which were her last words. Marie Antoinette’s fate and the years of hostility against her left an indelible mark on the history of France. Accused of being “the scourge and leech of the French” and the one who pushed the King to betray, the Queen, by crystallizing the fury of the people, had considerably tarnished the image of the monarchy before the Revolution broke out.

    Her Relationship with Axel von Fersen

    According to legend, the Swedish Count Axel von Fersen and Marie Antoinette met in 1774 and fell in love with each other. A book published by L’Archipel entitled “Marie Antoinette et le comte de Fersen – La correspondance secrète” (Marie Antoinette and the Count of Fersen: Secret Correspondence) explains this story. Axel von Fersen, Louis XVI’s political advisor at the Palace of Versailles, fell in love with Queen Antoinette and the two began exchanging letters across Europe.

    The Count de Fersen was therefore the “love of her life” for the French Queen. Even more shocking, the book implies that Fersen was the biological father of Louis Charles, the future King Louis XVII (1785–1795) and Sophie Béatrice (1786–1787) [Louis XVI’s second daughter who died in infancy].

    The letters exchanged by the two lovers were not released and properly decrypted until the publication of the aforementioned book in 2016. Invisible inks, duplicate envelopes, secret seals, numbers, code names, etc. were all utilized by the Count of Fersen and Marie Antoinette to conceal their unavowable devotion. On October 29, 1791, Axel von Fersen would write to the Queen, “Farewell, my dear friend, I love you and shall love you all my life fiercely.” After the royal escape attempt failed on June 2, 1791, Marie Antoinette wrote to him: “If I am here at all, it is only to express my undying love for you. […] Farewell to the most adored of men.”

    Key Dates of the History of Marie Antoinette

    The execution of Marie Antoinette on October 16 1793. Heritage Images / Getty Images
    Marie Antoinette’s execution in 1793 at the Place de la Révolution. Image: Wikimedia.

    November 2, 1755: Birth of Marie Antoinette

    Known by her full name, Marie-Antoinette-Josèphe-Jeanne d’Autriche-Lorraine, she entered the world on August 16, 1755, in Vienna. Her parents, Francis I of France and Maria Theresa of Austria, had 14 previous children, making Marie their fifteenth. From the moment she opened her eyes, her mother had set her sights on the oldest grandson of King Louis XV of France for a marriage.

    May 16, 1770: Louis XVI married Marie Antoinette

    Dauphin Louis or Louis XVI, grandson of Louis XV, married Marie Antoinette, daughter of Emperor Francis I of Lorraine and Maria Theresa of Austria, at Versailles. They were 14-year-old and 16-year-old in order. Choiseul, the Minister, wanted to strengthen the alliance with Austria so as to restrain the aggression of Prussia and England. The anti-Austrian sentiments, however, won out, and Marie Antoinette derisively dubbed “The Austrian” very soon. The two spouses, victims of the Revolution, were guillotined in 1793.

    May 10, 1774: Louis XVI, King of France

    Louis XVI, the grandson of the recently deceased Louis XV, ascended the throne of France with his wife Marie Antoinette. As an honest and intelligent monarch, he confidently claimed power. But he was so painfully timid that he failed to make a strong impression. A few years later, the kingdom’s finances collapsed due to the American Revolutionary War and Queen Antoinette’s irregular spending. The situation continued to deteriorate until the beginning of the French Revolution.

    19 December 1778: Birth of Marie Thérèse

    Marie Antoinette had her first child eight years into her marriage. Marie-Thérèse, a girl, was called “Madame Royale” by her admirers. Marie Antoinette was a doting mom who prioritized providing a carefree, natural environment for her kids, free from the constraints of social convention.

    October 22, 1781: Louis Joseph is born

    The birth of Marie Antoinette’s son Louis Joseph, the successor to the French throne, came almost three years after the birth of her daughter. As with his sister, the young dauphin was showered with love and care from his parents. But his health was precarious, and in 1786 he began exhibiting indications of tuberculosis. His health deteriorated rapidly, and he passed away on June 4, 1789, under the Estates General. The royal family was unable to grieve because of the revolutionary climate in France.

    March 27, 1785: The future Louis XVII is born

    Louis Charles, Duke of Normandy and future King Louis XVII, was born to Marie Antoinette, Queen of France. Upon his brother’s death in 1789, Louis Charles learned about the French Revolution’s awful occurrences.

    July 1785: The affair of the Queen’s necklace before the judges

    The courts exonerated Cardinal Rohan but gave the Countess de La Motte a whipping and a life sentence. The infamous con artist known as the Count of Balsamo (then known as Count Alessandro Cagliostro) was expelled from France. Queen Marie Antoinette’s discontent with the Cardinal of Rohan was used by La Motte and Balsamo to coax 2 million livres ($16.5 million) out of the cardinal.

    The cardinal felt he could redeem himself from the Queen by lending money for a diamond necklace. Considering her state of royalty, she could not openly indulge in such a desire. The deception was uncovered when the cardinal approached the Queen for the money. Despite the fact that Marie Antoinette had nothing to do with the scandal, she was badly judged by the people and the monarchy was again seen to be unreliable.

    May 1787: Marie Antoinette in favor of Loménie de Brienne

    The French monarchy’s monetary affairs were entrusted to Loménie de Brienne when the Queen ordered that Calonne be removed from his position. The gathering of prominent citizens had voted against his reforms. Loménie de Brienne was put in charge of the Royal Council of Finances, but she was unable to fix the disastrous state of the kingdom’s finances.

    August 25, 1788: Necker is recalled by the King

    Queen Marie Antoinette successfully lobbied for Louis XVI to fire Loménie de Brienne and reinstate the well-admired Necker in his position as Minister of Finance. It seemed that Marie Antoinette had now realized the depth of the animosity she had endured for so long. She made an effort to utilize her sway with the King to make things right, but her efforts were fruitless.

    October 5, 1789: The Parisian women demand bread

    In the late afternoon, some thousand women marched in riot to Versailles. They were sick of being hungry and being forced to pay exorbitant prices, so they protested King Louis XVI. On the evening of October 5th and 6th, Louis XVI finally gave in and accepted the decrees he had been fighting against for so long. The Parisians stormed the castle in an attempt to bring the royal family back to the city. To comply, the King and Queen relocated to the Tuileries Palace, where they lived out their days as French captives.

    June 21, 1791: Louis XVI arrested at Varennes

    In the hamlet of Varennes-en-Argonne, Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, their two children and the governess, disguised as servants, were captured. They had escaped from the Tuileries Palace the day before and joined the Marquis de Bouillé’s troops in Metz. However, the royal regiment was discovered at Sainte Menehould by postmaster Drouet, who alerted the authorities.

    Antoinette’s family was sent back to Paris. The public felt betrayed that the King had left the country. The Assembly temporarily removed the King from office. Marie Antoinette tried to portray this royal escape as a counter-revolutionary kidnapping in order to curb the Republicans. However, everything led to the shooting on the Champ-de-Mars and the killing of about 50 people.

    August 10, 1792: Capture of the Tuileries

    Parisian rebels attacked the Tuileries Palace. The French Army’s disarray was blamed on the King, who was suspected of treason. The Duke of Brunswick, commander-in-chief of the Prussian Army, issued a proclamation in France on August 1 in which he threatened to level the city if the royal family was endangered. After the Sans-culottes (lower-class partisans) marched on the Tuileries, slew the Swiss guards, and plundered the palace, the King was forced to seek sanctuary in the Assembly. The royal family was imprisoned in the Temple when the King was overthrown.

    August 12, 1792: The royal family imprisoned in the Temple

    Two days after the Parisian uprising, Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, and their two children were thrown into the jail of the Temple.

    January 21, 1793: Death of Louis XVI

    Execution of Louis XVI – German copperplate engraving, 1793, by Georg Heinrich Sieveking
    Execution of Louis XVI – German copperplate engraving, 1793, by Georg Heinrich Sieveking.

    Louis Capet or Louis XVI, 39 years old, former King of France, was guillotined at 10:20 a.m. on the Place de la Révolution (today’s Place de la Concorde). The Revolutionary Tribunal passed the death sentence in August 1792 while he was imprisoned with his family in the Tuileries. The delegates at the Congress branded him a national traitor. “My people, I die innocent! Gentlemen, I am innocent of everything of which I am accused. I hope that my blood may cement the good fortune of the French,” were his last words. But the drumbeat announcing his execution drowned out his last words. His wife Marie Antoinette was guillotined on October 16.

    July 3, 1793: The dauphin is taken from his mother

    Louis XVII or Louis Charles was removed from his mother, Marie Antoinette, and given to shoemaker Antoine Simon shortly after his father’s death. Louis Charles was mistreated, tortured into testifying against his mother and sister, deprived of food, and thrown in prison. Two years after he had to leave his family behind, he succumbed to his condition and died.

    It was the Revolutionary Tribunal public prosecutor, Fouquier Tinville who forced the small child to testify against his mother. Radical journalist Hébert claimed that his mother had incestuous connections. Louis XVII was reared among the common people after the death of his mother and was treated no better than the others. After being imprisoned in 1794, he was given to Simon, where he remained until his death in June 1795, and probably abused.

    August 2, 1793: Marie Antoinette taken to the Conciergerie

    The former Queen of France, Marie Antoinette, who had been held with her daughter and sister-in-law in the Temple, was transferred to the Conciergerie. A trial was scheduled to begin shortly.

    October 14, 1793: Marie Antoinette before the Revolutionary Tribunal

    At the hands of the Terror (Reign of Terror), Marie Antoinette faced trial. The Revolutionary Tribunal that presided over her trial was quick and efficient. She was accused of treason, but also of being a lousy mother and an immoral woman, as well as of having wasted French funds on banquets and dresses.

    Marie Antoinette was first taken into custody with King Louis XVI in June 1791 in Varennes. She spent the next year in the Temple before being transferred to the Conciergerie in August 1793. On October 16 after her day in court, she was publicly guillotined.

    October 16, 1793: Marie Antoinette is guillotined

    Marie Antoinette, the ousted Queen of France, was put to death in the Place de la Révolution (Place de la Concorde) in Paris on October 16 after a swift trial that had begun on October 14. She left her son and daughter behind with grace and dignity as she ascended the scaffold. The guillotine was her fate after she was convicted of treason. She had been incarcerated since the summer of 1792, just after the execution of her husband, Louis XVI.

    References

    1. Carolly Erickson (1991). “To the Scaffold: The Life of Marie Antoinette.”
    2. Thomas Kaiser (Fall 2003). “From the Austrian Committee to the Foreign Plot: Marie-Antoinette, Austrophobia, and the Terror“.
    3. Evelyn Farr (2016). “I Love You Madly: Marie-Antoinette and Count Fersen: The Secret Letters.”
    4. Chantal Thomas (1999). “The Wicked Queen: The Origins of the Myth of Marie-Antoinette.”
    5. Kathryn Lasky (2000). The Royal Diaries: Marie Antoinette, Princess of Versailles: Austria-France, 1769.
  • Persian Empire: From the Achaemenids to the Sasanians

    Persian Empire: From the Achaemenids to the Sasanians

    The Achaemenid dynasty’s Persian Empire, also known as the Achaemenid Empire, was one of the largest ancient states. The dynasties succeeded one another, and the conquests connected a landmass far greater than that held by modern-day Iran (or Persia) until the empire faded away gradually under the Sasanians. Decades of history, including encounters with luminaries like Cyrus II and Alexander the Great, encompass the Persian Empire. Persia defined both antiquity and modern history. Delve deep into this empire, from the Achaemenids to the Sasanians, from Muslim rule to the founding of Iran.

    Who was the founder of the Persian Empire?

    The Persian Empire and the Achaemenid dynasty may trace their origins back to Cyrus II, often known as Cyrus the Great. In the beginning, Cyrus II defeated the Medes, and then he went on to capture the Kingdom of Lydia. The Persian Empire continued to expand with further victories on the Iranian Plateau and in Central Asia. Cyrus II, a person in myths and stories from antiquity and the modern day, died in combat around 530 BC.

    Who were the kings of the Achaemenid Persian Empire?

    After Cyrus II’s death, numerous kings took his place as leaders of the Achaemenid Empire. Cambyses II, Cyrus II’s first heir apparent, made a name for himself by conquering Egypt. Darius I, who dethroned Bardiya, used his newfound power to launch an invasion of Macedonia and the Cyclades. It was his son Xerxes I who lost the Second Persian War against the Greeks. The subsequent Achaemenid monarchs, like Sogdianos, Darius II, and Arses, had varying degrees of success.

    How was the Achaemenid Persian Empire organized?

    The Achaemenid Empire at its greatest extent, c. 500 BC.
    The Achaemenid Empire at its greatest extent, c. 500 BC.

    By 550 BC, under King Cyrus II, the Achaemenid Persian Empire had emerged after his conquest of the Medes, and by 330 BC, the Empire had been wiped out by Alexander the Great’s conquests. During this time, the Achaemenid Persian Empire was run on a system of satrapies, with the general populace submitting to the authority of the Persian monarch. Justice and the pursuit of virtue were central tenets of Mazdaism, the religion of the Achaemenid Persian Empire. Lydia, now a part of western Turkey, was where the first coins in history were originally created, and from there they spread over the Persian Empire.

    What was the capital of the Persian Empire?

    A general view of the ruins at Persepolis.
    A general view of the ruins at Persepolis.

    Ancient Pasargadae, in what is now Iran’s Fars Province, served as the initial capital of the Persian Empire. Various towns in Persia had succeeded as the country’s capital throughout the years. The Achaemenid Persian Empire’s most famous capital was Persepolis, whose name in Greek meant “the city of the Persians” and was built by Darius I. Even lesser-known cities like Ecbatana, Susa, and Babylon had their share of fame throughout history.

    How did the Persian Empire become Seleucid?

    Alexander the Great
    Alexander the Great.

    After defeating Darius III at the Battle of Gaugamela in 331 BC, Alexander the Great was widely recognized as the last ruler of the Achaemenid Empire. In the next 20 years, Seleucus I established the Seleucid Dynasty. By the 1st century BC, the Seleucid dynasty—including Seleucus I, Antiochus I, Demetrios I, etc.—had ruled over Babylonia and Mesopotamia for many centuries. These people gained notoriety for their roles in the Syrian Wars (168 BC–274 BC) and the establishment of the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom.

    How did the Parthians conquer the Persian Empire?

    The Parthians, once a nomadic tribe, established a kingdom in approximately 250 BC under the leadership of Arsace I. The Parthians, led by Mithridates I, took advantage of the Seleucids’ defeat to the Romans to declare their independence and establish themselves as the lords of Bactria and Mesopotamia. What they founded was an empire whose civilization was a synthesis of the Persian, Greek, and Armenian traditions. Ardashir I deposed the last Parthian monarch in 224 BC and established the Sasanian dynasty.

    How did the Sasanians take power in Persia?

    After defeating Artabanus IV, the last Parthian ruler, in 226 BC, Ardashir I established the Sasanian Empire and became its king. The Sasanians restored the Persian Empire to its former glory over the course of roughly four centuries. Religious leaders, soldiers, and farmers were the three main castes of Sasanian society, which was structured on a monarchical system. It marked the pinnacle of agricultural advancement and of Zoroastrianism as the official religion.

    How did the Persian Empire collapse?

    Muslims (or Arab-Islamic peoples) first started conquering Persia in about the year 637 AD. The final Sasanian monarch, Yazdegerd III, fought the Muslim caliphate and its development of the Islamic Empire for a long time. Once again, Yazdegerd III was beaten, this time at the Battle of Nahavand after losing at the Battle of al-Qadisiyya. As a result of these two setbacks, the Persian Empire began to crumble.

    Once the Muslims took over, what happened to the Persian Empire?

    Once Yazdegerd III passed away in 651 AD, all of Persia was free from Islamic rule. The Muslim caliphate cast doubt on Zoroastrianism and extended an invitation to convert to Islam to a broad segment of the Persian populace. In the realm of the erstwhile Persian Empire, Iranians and Arabs lived together for a long time without mixing. For instance, during that time, Persian rather than Arabic was recognized as the official language of Persia.

    Where is Persia today?

    Picture of Reza Shah, emperor of Iran in the early 30's in uniform.
    Picture of Reza Shah, emperor of Iran in the early ’30s in uniform.

    Modern-day Iran is a modern-day reference to ancient Persia. General Reza Shah Pahlavi led an uprising against Russian and British rule in the early 1920s. He declared independence for his country. He was so committed to modernizing his nation that he declared to the world that the land formerly known as Persia would henceforth be known as Iran. In Iran, countless items (vases, figurines, etc.), architectural remnants, and archaeological sites such as Haft Tappeh bore testament to the stamp of ancient Persia.

    Key dates in the history of Persia

    539 BC – The Persians conquer Mesopotamia

    The Jewish people were permitted to return to their ancient homelands when the Persians conquered Mesopotamia. Not everyone followed this path; some stayed in Babylon or the countries that received them during the diaspora. After many years in exile, many exiles returned to Jerusalem to worship in the newly built Temple of Jerusalem. Although a new memorial was built, it paled in comparison to the Old Temple, and the monarchy never returned to the country again.

    525 BC – The Persians conquer Egypt

    Ancient Egypt had been weakened by invasions and battles of succession prior to its fall into Persian control. Then, King Cambyses II ruled over the whole region. Even though the last native pharaohs had forced the Persians out, they were able to take back Egypt a few years later.

    498 BC – Capture of Sardis

    The Greeks invaded the city of Sardis in Asia Minor as part of their war against the Persians. They burned down the lower town but were unable to take the citadel. Angry with the Greeks for their invasion of Sardis, Darius took his revenge at the Battle of Ephesus. After that, the Persian monarch Darius instituted a strict regime of punishment and control over the Greek population.

    494 BC – Sack of Miletus

    Aristagoras’ uprising in Ionia culminated in the destruction of Miletus at the hands of the Persian Army. The commencement of the Middle Ages can be traced back to this event, which is often referred to as “The Sack of Miletus.” The Achaemenid rulers would use this opportunity to retaliate against Athens for interfering with the revolts of the Greek towns in Asia.

    490 BC – Darius destroys Byzantium

    Darius I of Persia launched an invasion of the Greek city of Byzantium. Darius’s major goals during the First Persian War were to seize possession of a city that had a geographically advantageous location between Asia and Europe and send a strong message to Athens, which backed the Ionian Revolt.

    September 13, 490 BC – Battle of Marathon

    Miltiades led 10,000 Athenian hoplites into battle against invading Persian forces on the plain of Marathon. The Persians were outnumbered, yet they still lost badly. The First Persian War ended here, and Athens reached its zenith. This fight inspired the tale of Philippides, whose name is associated with the creation of the marathon race.

    486 BC – Death of Darius I

    After his father Darius I passed away, his son Xerxes I inherited leadership of the Persian Empire with the intention of exacting revenge for his father’s defeat at the hands of the Greeks. Xerxes I began the Second Persian War, which included an assault on Athens. The Achaemenid dynasty oversaw the rise of the Persian Empire, which lasted until Alexander the Great’s invasions in 330 BC.

    483 BC- Discovery of the mines of Laurion

    The Athenians discovered silver mines on their own land in Laurion. They used the wealth from these mines to improve life in Athens and to construct 200 warships (triremes) to bolster the Greek fleet. Themistocles made this strategic choice that would pay off at Salamis, the climax of the Second Persian War.

    July, 480 BC – Junction of the Persian troops

    The Persians had regrouped at Thessalonica, giving them access to 600 ships and 150,000 men. Greek forces, however, decided to pull back from the country’s northern coast and reorganize on the other side of the Pass of Thermopylae. The Greeks wanted to use the narrow nature of the area to their advantage.

    September 17, 480 BC – Beginning of the Battle of Artemisium

    In anticipation of the Persian fleet, 300 Greek triremes sailed to the cape of Artemisium to begin the Battle of Artemisium. The Greek fleet was forced to retreat in front of the opposing fleet, but in doing so they were able to slow the march of the Persian army. A storm hit a few days after this engagement, destroying most of the Persian fleet that had decided to go inland.

    September 19, 480 BC – Heroic defeat of Leonidas at Thermopylae

    480 BC battle of thermopylae
    The Battle of Thermopylae, 480 BC.

    The Greek army had been forced to retreat toward the Isthmus of Corinth after a (possible) treachery. King Leonidas I of Sparta, aided by 700 volunteers, resisted the 10,000 Persians that had surrounded him. Leonidas I and his men fought to the death, and their sacrifice permitted the bulk of the Greek forces to retreat. The Parthenon was among the many buildings the Persians burned during their invasion of Athens.

    29 September, 480 BC – Victory of the Greeks in Salamis

    The Greeks, realizing their numerical disadvantage against the Persian fleet, feigned to retreat. In actuality, their goal was to guide the Persians across the very constricted Strait of Salamis. Parts of Persian ships were destroyed in this conflict because they were lured into the trap prepared by the Athenian strategist Themistocles.

    August 27, 479 BC – Death of Mardonius in Plataea

    Mardonius, an esteemed Persian leader, was killed while leading his army against a force of Lacedaemonians. Greek forces under Pausanias’ command took advantage of this to beat the Persians at Plataea, thereby ending the status quo between the two camps after the Greek victory at Salamis. This incident inaugurated the Persian Army’s retreat from the Ionian metropolises.

    478 BC – The Spartan Pausanias takes Byzantium

    After his impressive performance at Plataea, Pausanias was given leadership of the Greek forces so that they might continue their war against the Persians. Pausanias, a regent of Sparta, marched on Cyprus and captured Byzantium. The city, devastated by Darius a few years before, was being rebuilt.

    478 BC – Formation of the Delian League

    Several Greek communities decided to form a league in response to the rising imperialism of the time and their fleet’s victory at Salamis. Themistocles and Aristeides took the first move toward establishing the Delian League by initiating this treaty. This new organization, which gave Athens control over the army, solely applied to the fleet and had nothing to do with the regular soldiers.

    472 BC – Aeschylus presents The Persians

    Aeschylus suggested that The Persians be staged at Athens. References to the Second Persian War could be found in this Greek play, the earliest one for which we have a text. Aeschylus, who was there throughout the conflict, used his first-hand knowledge to write a tragedy that forever changed the genre. In fact, it was the first occasion in history that so many performers were onstage at the same time.

    336 BC – Alexander the Great becomes king of Macedonia

    The 20-year-old Alexander the Great succeeded his father as King of Macedonia. Without hesitation, he eliminated his enemies, put down the insurrection at Thebes, and kept up the war against the Persian Empire that his father began.

    334 BC – Beginning of the war against the Persians

    Alexander the Great fought the Persians beginning in 334 BC. With a force of 30,000 soldiers and 5,000 horsemen at his disposal, he rode forth in the direction of Asia and won the Battle of the Granicus, therefore enabling him to destroy Darius’s army. Alexander the Great’s conquests, which lasted a decade and required him to walk more than 6,200 miles (10,000 kilometers) on foot, were bolstered by this victory against the monarch of Persia.

    332 BC – Alexander the Great conquers Judea

    In the end, Alexander the Great was successful in his conquest of Judea. In this area, which the Persians had evacuated, the Jews were allowed a certain degree of independence. Many of them decided to make Alexandria their permanent home at that time. The influence of Hellenistic culture on Jews inside the kingdom led to tensions between Jews who embraced this culture, also known as Hellenistic Jews, and those who did not.

    332 BC – Alexander arrived in Egypt where he was acclaimed as a liberator

    the battle of issus francesco coghetti 1
    The Battle of Issus, Francesco Coghetti, 19th century.

    The Persian Army suffered yet another loss at the hands of Alexander the Great and his army at Issus (Cilicia). Darius was forced to evacuate Egypt since he was helpless against Alexander the Great’s invasion. The first Greek colony of Alexandria was founded by the King of Macedonia on the land where he was hailed as a liberator and acknowledged as a descendant of Amon.

    October, 331 BC – Victory of Alexander the Great at Gaugamela

    Alexander the Great was successful in defeating the King of Persia in Mesopotamia for the third time since the beginning of the war. Darius III was on the run in the mountains while Alexander the Great expanded his control over the Middle East and Egypt. As a result, Alexander the Great took control of the Achaemenid Empire’s wealth and was crowned the King of Asia.

    330 BC – In pursuit of Darius

    Alexander the Great knew that he had to locate Darius
    Alexander discovers the body of Darius.

    Alexander the Great knew that he had to locate Darius if he was to succeed Darius as King of Persia. The new King of Asia set out on an expedition to find Darius. Darius, along with a small group of loyalists, had fled into the mountains just as Alexander the Great was about to arrive.

    Before Alexander the Great arrived, Darius was murdered. Alexander decided to restore Darius’ royal status and vowed to seek revenge for his murder. To this end, he tracked down and killed the satrap Bessus in Bactria, who was suspected of being behind Darius’s murder.

    329 BC – Three years to pacify Persia

    Over the course of three years, Alexander the Great battled hard to conquer the regions of Hyrcania, Aria, Arachosia, Bactria, and Sogdiana. The new ruler of Persia established several Alexandrias over the course of his conquest. A yearning to return home was the last straw in Alexander the Great’s long and exhausting campaign to bring peace to Persia.

    326 BC – A trying return home

    Alexander the Great’s army was divided into three factions en route to the Indus Valley. Alexander the Great went toward the desert of Gedrosia, while Nearchus traversed the Persian Gulf and Craterus crossed the Balon Pass with his elephants. Alexander the Great and his army arrived in Susa in 324 BC and they immediately began planning the next invasions. Alexander the Great, on the eve of new conquests, embraced the quest of bringing together Macedonians, Greeks, and Asians into one nation.

    326 BC – Alexander invades Punjab

    Alexander the Great had crossed all of Persia and was now in the East. Alexander invaded Punjab despite opposition from King Porus and the deployment of elephants as a weapon of resistance. As a result of the battles, Alexander the Great had to abandon his quest for India because his warriors were too tired to continue. The Seleucid dynasty began with Alexander the Great’s landing in Punjab.

    May 5, 614 – The Persians seize the True Cross

    Jerusalem, a holy city for Christians, fell to the Persians under King Khosrow II (Chosroes II), who went on to steal the “True Cross” relic in 614. The churches were burned down, and 35,000 people were sold into slavery. Heraclius I, the Byzantine emperor who in 627 had beaten the Persians at Nineveh, later returned the True Cross to Jerusalem in 630. In 638, the city was conquered by Muslims.

    December 12, 627 – Victory of Heraclius over the Persians

    Heraclius I, Emperor of Byzantium, defeated Khosrow II, King of Persia, in a battle for control of Nineveh in 627 in the Middle East. In a triumphal march into the Sasanian Persian capital of Ctesiphon, Alexander compelled the Sasanians to hand over Egypt to the Byzantine Empire. After it had been looted by the Persians in 614, Heraclius I returned to Jerusalem with the True Cross in 630.

    632 – Abu Bakr succeeds Muhammad

    It was Abu Bakr, the Prophet’s father-in-law, who was named Caliph. He was able to calm tensions between Medina and Mecca that had arisen about who would follow Mohammed. Then, all of Arabia was forcibly converted to Islam. Omar, a devoted companion of the Prophet, was named his successor and went on to conquer Syria, Egypt, and Persia. After Omar’s death in 644, his successor, Uthman, carried on with the conquests.

    1055 – Tughril Beg is recognized as Sultan in Baghdad

    A Sunni Turkish Seljuk dynasty member, Tughril conquered Baghdad and was acknowledged as ruler by the Abbasid Caliph. This dynasty had previously ruled over Persia. By 1038, he had already overthrown the Buyid dynasty and taken control of Nishapur. The Fatimids were the first to build a Sunni Muslim empire in the region, and the Seljuks would follow in their footsteps by creating a massive state across Asia Minor and Syria. Conflicts over inheritance, the presence of the Franks, and local uprisings all contributed to the fragmentation of the region beginning in 1092.

    1501 – The Safavids reign over Persia

    The Safavid dynasty, founded by Ismail I, established a Shiite kingdom after the expulsion of the Timurids. The kingdom depended on “Twelver,” a philosophy that would become central to Iranian Shiism. Isfahan replaced Shiraz as the dynastic capital several years later. The Safavids, however, were wiped off by Afghan invasions in the 18th century and never recovered.

  • Nero: Biography of the Despotic Roman Emperor

    Nero: Biography of the Despotic Roman Emperor

    Nero (Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus)’s birth date is traditionally accepted to be December 15th, 37 AD, at Antium, while his death date is conventionally accepted to be June 9th, 68 AD, in Rome. Emperor Vespasian was the fifth and last ruler of the Roman Empire under the Julio-Claudian Dynasty. Nero seems like a complex figure since he has been called both a brutal ruler and a poet. Yet the Emperor’s capricious nature continues to captivate. The majority of what is known about Nero comes from biographies published 40 years after the events, such as those by Suetonius and Tacitus.

    Childhood Under Caligula

    The head of Emperor Nero. 64 AD. The statue is 7.9 feet (2.4) meters tall.
    The head of Emperor Nero. 64 AD. The statue is 7.9 feet (2.4 meters) tall.

    The true name of Nero is Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus, and he was born to Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus and Agrippina the Younger, the sister of Caligula. Caligula assumed power on March 16, 37 AD, when he was 24 years old. In the event that Nero’s uncle did not produce a male successor, Nero might assume the throne. But when it came to their brother Caligula, Agrippina and her sisters were quite close. So, Caligula was greatly influenced by them.

    As a matter of fact, Nero was born to a prominent mother. Nero did not go with his mother when she was banished to the Pontine Islands because of her role in a plot against Caligula. In 40 AD, Nero’s father passed away. Caligula, his wife, and their daughter were all murdered in a plot that was hatched on January 24, 41 AD. So, the winds shifted in favor of Nero when Caligula’s successor, Claudius, called Agrippina back to Rome.

    Claudius Adopts Nero

    But Nero had little chance of succeeding Claudius as Emperor. The Emperor had two children: the heir apparent Octavia, born in 40 AD, and Britannicus, born in 41 AD. But the rules changed with Agrippina. Emperor Claudius’s wife Messalina was put to death in the year 48 AD on charges of conspiracy. On January 1, 49, Agrippina married Claudius, making her his fourth wife. She also planned Nero’s marriage to his half-sister Octavia, which took place later in 53 AD. Claudius then formally adopted Nero on February 25, 50 AD, changing his name to “Nero Claudius Caesar Drusus.” Lucius was now called Nero. He was the legitimate successor to the kingdom since he was older than his adopted brother. Even though Nero was just 14 years old when Claudius freed him in 51 AD, he still went on to make Nero proconsul, invite him into the Senate, depict him on the coins.

    Nero Becomes Emperor

    Claudius died of poisoning on October 13, 54 AD. In 54 AD, Nero’s reign as Emperor began when he was just 17 years old. From the start of his reign, he had the support of his mother, the scholar Seneca, and Sextus Afranius Burrus, prefect of the praetorium. He hoped to win over the common people and the military by offering bonuses. His personal life could be in tatters, but the Empire was in good hands. Nero was unhappy in his marriage and began keeping a former slave called Claudia Acte as his lover. However, Agrippina supported Octavia, while Seneca and Burrus backed the Emperor.

    Nero prevented his mother from further meddling in his life by removing herself from the picture. He also faced constant competition from Britannicus, his adopted brother and a trusted ally of the majority. Britannicus, however, passed away unexpectedly on or around February 12, 55 AD. Suetonius and other ancient authors suggested that Nero might have poisoned him. It seems more plausible, however, that Britannicus experienced an epileptic fit before his death, which led to the burst of an aneurysm.

    Nero lived a hedonistic life as Emperor and left state business to his counselors. In the year 59 AD, Nero had his mother, Agrippina, murdered, perhaps with the help of his beloved Poppaea. Despite Seneca’s best efforts, the Emperor’s reputation was damaged by this incident. From the year 62 AD on, further changes were done under Nero’s rule. Since Burrus had passed away, Nero needed a new advisor, and Seneca had already decided to step down.

    Nero chose Tigellinus, who, upon taking office, issued a slew of anti-treason statutes. In addition, Nero’s mistress fell pregnant, and he still didn’t have any heirs. Everything got to the point where Nero wanted to marry her and end things with Octavia, so he did just that. Nero started by making false accusations of adultery against Octavia. Unlike Nero, though, Octavia was held up as an example of virtue. In the end, the divorce was finalized with Octavia’s infertility as the reason. On June 9, 62, Octavia committed suicide by cutting her veins, sparking widespread unrest.

    Great Fire of Rome: Did Nero Burn Rome?

    Hubert Robert (1733–1808), The Fire of Rome (1785).
    Hubert Robert (1733–1808), The Fire of Rome (1785). Museum of modern art André Malraux. Wikimedia Commons.

    The Great Fire of Rome occurred on July 18, 64 AD, near the Circus Maximus. Nero had taken a holiday to Antium at the time. As soon as he heard about it, he hurried back. The story spread like wildfire that Nero played lyre and sang atop the Quirinal as the city burned. In actuality, some historians believe that Nero welcomed the destitute inside his palace and fed them to prevent a famine. People blamed Nero since he was the one who announced ambitions to reconstruct Rome swiftly in a magnificent manner.

    But Emperor Nero looked to the Christians as a new scapegoat for the populace. Starting in October, he launched a campaign of extraordinary persecution against them. Some he sent to the lions, while others he crucified and burned to death. The martyrdom of Sts. Peter and Paul is linked to these events in Christian mythology. But there’s no proof of it. Nero had a new palace constructed after the devastating fire, and it was much larger.

    Nero the Olympic champion

    Nero won the Olympic Games in 67 AD after spending around one million sesterces to bribe judges and organizers of the tournament. In the midst of his triumph, the Roman emperor makes the executive decision to provide tax exemptions to his Greek guests who are already residing inside Roman territory. Nero brought back 1,808 olive wreaths to Rome to celebrate every one of his “assumed” victories at the Olympics.

    The Death of Nero

    nero suikast min
    Vasily Sergeyevich Smirnov (1858-1890), Nero’s Death (1888), oil on canvas, The Russian Museum.

    Another controversy involved Nero in the year 65 AD. Since it was seen shameful for an emperor to engage in public entertainment, his reputation suffered. Pisonian conspiracy, in which his old friend Seneca played a part, was the next scandal.

    buy cozaar online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/cozaar.html no prescription pharmacy

    Roman statesman Gaius Calpurnius Piso intended to have Nero assassinated and Nero, in return, ordered Piso, the philosopher Seneca, Seneca’s nephew Lucan, and the satirist Petronius to commit suicide.

    Nero also ordered a heroic general, who was well respected, to commit suicide as well. But Nero asked for too much without even realizing it. The military leaders were now planning a revolution against the Emperor. The historians Suetonius and Tacitus report that Nero had kicked his pregnant wife Poppea in the stomach which killed her. Nero then made another marriage proposal to Claudia Antonia, but she turned it down.

    Consequently, Nero had her sentenced to death on the grounds that she was plotting against him. He wed his lover, Statilia Messalina, in May of 66 AD. Nero then spent a year traveling in Greece and treating himself to cultural performances while he was there. At the same time, in Rome, praetorian prefect Nymphidius Sabinus was trying to win over the support of the senators and the Praetorian Guard.

    Nero had noticed a shift in the atmosphere since his return to Rome. Then the uprisings began. It started with Vindex, the governor of Lyon Gaul. Then the legate of the Legio III Augusta legion in Africa, which had been supplying Rome with wheat, stopped doing so. Later, Nymphidius Sabinus took over the Praetorian Guard (Imperial Guard). Nero was finally expelled from office by the Senate, and as a result, he took his own life. On June 9, 68 AD, at the age of 30, Emperor Nero slit his throat at the rural home of his loyal freedman Phaon, bringing an end to the Julio-Claudian Dynasty.

    After Nero’s death, the Senate passed a resolution to damnatio memoriae Nero (condemnation of memory). Numerous civil wars and the change of imperial dynasties characterized the year 69 as the “Year of the Four Emperors.”

    Family Tree of Nero and His Titles

    Nero was the grandson of Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus and Antonia the Elder, daughter of Mark Antony and Octavia the Younger (the latter being the sister of Augustus and the grand-niece of Julius Caesar), adopted son of Claudius, son of Agrippa the Younger and also the great-great-grandson of former emperor Augustus (descended from his daughter Julia). From 53 to 62 AD, Nero was married to Claudia Octavia; from 62 to 65 AD, to Poppea, with whom he had a daughter who died shortly after birth; from 66 to 68 AD, to Statilia Messalina; and from 66 to 68 AD, to Sporus.

    In 37 AD, Nero was known as Lucius Domitius Ahenobarbus; in 50 AD, he was known as Nero Claudius Caesar Drusus Germanicus; and in 66 AD, he was known as Emperor Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus.

    buy vidalista online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/vidalista.html no prescription pharmacy

    Additionally, Nero held a number of magistracies and titles, including Pontifex maximus and Pater Patriae in 55 AD, consul in 55, 57, 58, 60, and 68 AD, and acclaimed Emperor in 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 66, and 67 AD. Nero also received the tribunician power (tribunicia potestas) in 54 AD, and had it renewed each year afterwards. His full title at the time of his death was “Emperor Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus Pontifex Maximus Tribunicia Potestate XIV, Emperor XII, Consul V, Pater Patriae.”

    Legacy of Nero

    Henryk Siemiradzki (1843–1902), Nero’s Torches (Christian Candlesticks)
    Henryk Siemiradzki (1843–1902), Nero’s Torches (Christian Candlesticks) (1876). National Museum in Krakow. Wikimedia Commons.

    The Emperor Nero is often seen in contemporary work. Henryk Sienkiewicz’s book “Quo Vadis?” which won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1905, is one such work; so, too, are Hubert Monteilhet’s “Neropolis.”

    Several movies were born from Henryk Sienkiewicz’s work, including a 1951 film directed by Mervyn Leroy and starring Peter Ustinov as Nero. Brigitte Bardot plays Poppea in the 1956 film “Nero’s Weekend,” directed by Stefano Steno. Nero has appeared on stage (in Jean Racine’s “Britannicus”), in comics, and in video games.

    buy stendra online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/stendra.html no prescription pharmacy

    Operas including Claudio Monteverdi’s “L’incoronazione di Poppea” (1642), Anton Rubinstein’s “Nero” (1879), Arrigo Boito’s “Nerone” (1924), and Pietro Mascagni’s “Nero” (1935) were all inspired by him. Nero has even lent his name to a software for burning discs called “Nero Burning ROM.”

    Key Dates for Nero

    • 15 December 37: Birth of Nero

    Agrippina the Younger, Caligula’s sister, gave birth to Nero. That made him the Emperor’s nephew. Initially, he had no right to the throne. His mother, however, was well-known and influential, and she plotted for her son to one day become Emperor.

    • 25 February 50: Claudius adopted Nero

    Nero’s mother, Agrippina the Younger, was ultimately able to wed Emperor Claudius. Therefore, she also arranged for the Emperor to adopt him. Due to his seniority, Nero was anointed Emperor rather than Claudius’s younger son Britannicus.

    • 13 October 54: Nero becomes Emperor

    Nero became Emperor after the death of Claudius. Through the use of his authority, he had his mother murdered despite her role as an adviser at the start of his reign and he was later accused of killing his half-brother Britannicus, his chief contender for the throne. His rule was marked by brutality, an appreciation for the arts and a penchant for hedonism; he left official business in the hands of his entourage while he and his wife indulged in their passions. All of this would ultimately lead to his downfall and the end of his reign as Emperor.

    • July 19, 64: Rome ravaged by a fire

    The whole city of Rome was destroyed by a massive fire that started in the middle of the night near the “Circus Maximus.” It took six days to put out the fire because of its size. Having spent some time in the countryside, Emperor Nero hastened his return to the imperial city. He had a new palace constructed after the devastating blaze, and it was much larger. The commoners blamed him for starting the fire so that Rome could be rebuilt to his desires. The despotic ruler immediately pointed the finger at the Christian minority. Starting in October, he launched a campaign of extraordinary persecution against them.

    • 9 June 68: Death of Nero

    The reign of the Julio-Claudian Dynasty ended with Nero’s death. The Senate passed a resolution to “damnatio memoriae” him (condemnation of memory) when he passed away. Numerous civil wars and the changing of imperial dynasties characterized the year 69. It’s later called “The Year of the Four Emperors.”

  • Thales of Miletus: First philosopher, founder of Ionian School

    Thales of Miletus: First philosopher, founder of Ionian School

    Thales of Miletus, an important thinker in the fields of astronomy and mathematics, is sometimes cited as the first Greek philosopher. The Thales’ Theorem is named after him, and he is considered one of the Seven Sages of Greece. Thales of Miletus is a mysterious figure about whom not much is known. The most trustworthy sources tell us that he was born into a rich family in Miletus (Asia Minor, modern-day Turkey), and that he went on to pursue careers in philosophy, mathematics, astronomy, engineering, and politics.


    Thales’ origin

    The accepted birth and death dates for Thales of Miletus may be questioned, as can the dates for most other individuals from his time. We know that Thales lived from around 625 BC until 547 BC at Miletus. It is often believed that Thales was the creator of the Milesian School of thought (also known as the Ionian School) and several mathematical theorems, however, there is no definitive proof for all of them.

    Nonetheless, his influence on philosophizing and scientific inquiry is undeniable. In ancient Greece, Thales was considered one of the Seven Sages of Greece. Because of his status as an idealized character from antiquity, his life story is also dependent on conjecture. However, one may infer certain truths that have been independently confirmed from the works of Herodotus, Diogenes, and Aristotle.

    Thales was a politician

    Thales started off as a trader and then moved into politics. He would be of Greek or Phoenician descent being the son of trader Examyes, and mother Cleobulina. In the battle between the Greek city-state commanded by Croesus, King of Lydia, and the Persian King Cyrus II, Thales played a pivotal role as a political advisor for Croesus. During Cyrus’s triumph, the city-state of Miletus was spared by an alliance with Croesus, which Thales opposed. With his economic acumen and political influence, Thales quickly became a wealthy and famous figure.

    Thales was a mathematician

    The mathematician was likely introduced to Egyptian and Babylonian knowledge on a visit to Egypt. In that location, Thales used a shadow cast on the ground to determine how tall the Pyramid of Cheops was; his measurement was very close to the one we calculate today. Even though Thales’ Theorem does not cover the same thing in all countries, he is still the creator of a number of studies in geometry. Even though the proof of his studies did not surface until many centuries after Thales’ death, his name has been associated with the field of mathematics forever.

    Thales was an astronomer

    The duration of a year (365 days and 6 hours), the sizes of the Sun and Moon, and the lunar ephemeris were all computed by Thales, who is also regarded as one of the first astronomers. Also, Thales correctly prophesied a solar eclipse that happened amid a conflict between the Lydians and the Medes (Persians). His approach was groundbreaking at the time. Indeed, he was not content to just list characteristics; rather, Thales carefully examined, probed, and investigated the source of the occurrences he saw. He abandoned mythology in favor of a more scientific worldview, which inevitably led him to theorize about the nature of reality.

    buy hydroxychloroquine online https://silvermancare.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/hydroxychloroquine.html no prescription pharmacy

    Thales was a philosopher

    The ancient Greek philosopher Thales of Miletus looked to the water that made up the world around him to gain insight into nature. Everything, in his view, could be traced back to water. Water, being fundamental to all forms of life, became the guiding force of the cosmos, the foundation upon which air, fire, and earth rest. Because of his method and his many scientific investigations, Thales is still well-known today for having introduced the first rationalization of the world. Two centuries later, when Plato and Aristotle were developing their philosophies, this idea had a significant effect on their work.


    The legend has it that, despite the importance of writing to the Ionian School—the school he is said to have founded—Thales never wrote a word. Since the 8th century BC, Milet has been the dominant naval power in Asia Minor. Several historical authors confirm that Thales, excluding his travels, probably spent his whole life in his own city.

    buy ventolin inhaler online https://silvermancare.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/ventolin-inhaler.html no prescription pharmacy

    This implies a concentration of knowledge and power at the heart of this city. In a progressive move, his institution, the Ionian School, maintained the role of God in its lessons while still pursuing rational rational thinking.

    The guiding principles of the Ionian School of thought were the pursuit of natural causes and the application of reason.

    Thales predicted the solar eclipse of 585 BC

    Thales’s predicted solar eclipse of 585 BC occurred on May 28.

    It was foretold by Thales, the ancient Greek philosopher and astronomer, that a solar eclipse would occur in the year 585 BC. And after the eclipse happened, Thales shot to fame overnight. No one knows how Thales was able to make this forecast, although it’s possible he used calculations based on the motion of the stars. Another possibility is that he had some kind of insight into the Saros cycle, the predictable time frame between eclipses. A conflict between the forces of Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar and the King of Lydia was halted during this eclipse, according to Herodotus.

  • Christiaan Huygens: Founder of the Wave Theory of Light and First Pendulum Clocks

    Christiaan Huygens: Founder of the Wave Theory of Light and First Pendulum Clocks

    Christiaan Huygens, also known as Christianus Hugenius, was a Dutch astronomer, mathematician, and physicist who was born (April 14, 1629) and died (July 8, 1695) in The Hague. Huygens is widely regarded as one of the most accomplished scientists and mathematicians of the 17th century, despite the fact that he never used the “infinitesimal calculus” that was established during his lifetime. While studying the effects of elastic impact, he developed a concept of relativity and built the first pendulum clocks, cementing his place in history as the creator of the wave theory of light. He made significant astronomical discoveries using telescopes that he refined.

    Christiaan Huygens’ Origin and Education

    Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695).
    Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695).

    Huygens was born the son of Constantijn Huygens, who was a linguist, diplomat, composer, and the leading poet in Holland at the time. Christiaan’s early exposure to famous people like Rembrandt, Peter Paul Rubens, and René Descartes was made possible by his father’s extensive network. Throughout Christiaan’s childhood, he received instruction from his father. Later, he attended the University of Leiden to study law, but he quickly shifted his focus to the “hard sciences” instead.

    In 1651, he published his first paper on the squaring of cones in which he demonstrated a flaw in a supposed proof of the squaring of the circle. In addition, he tackled the π (pi), worked on logarithms, and laid the groundwork for the infinitesimal calculus, which was later developed by Gottfried Leibniz and Isaac Newton.

    One of the earliest works on probability theory, De ludo aleae (Dice Theory) was published under his name in 1657. This was preceded by correspondence between Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Fermat, the contents of which, however, Huygens claimed to know nothing about. Examining the answers to the five questions at the conclusion of his book suggests that he was conversant with Pascal’s theories but unfamiliar with Fermat’s combinatorial techniques.

    Turning to the Natural Sciences

    Huygens's aerial telescope from Astroscopia Compendiaria tubi optici molimine liberata (1684).
    Huygens’s aerial telescope from Astroscopia Compendiaria tubi optici molimine liberata (1684).

    Telescopes piqued Huygens’ interest in natural science, optics, and astronomy, all cutting-edge disciplines at the time. He spoke with Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, the preeminent microscope lens grinder and designer of his day. Huygens briefly studied microscopic items as well.

    His first telescope was built with the help of his brother, Constantijn Huygens Junior. However, he soon started grinding lenses for telescopes on his own. As a result of his work on the wave theory of light, Huygens was able to grind lenses with fewer aberrations and create more precise telescopes; his findings also contributed to an improvement in picture clarity for the camera obscura and the magic lantern. Huygens’ Principle, which was named after him, was the foundation of wave optics. Huygens, like many other scientists of his day, postulated the existence of an aether that both light and gravity traveled through.

    Huygens's explanation for the aspects of Saturn, Systema Saturnium (1659).
    Huygens’s explanation for the aspects of Saturn, Systema Saturnium (1659).

    Titan, a moon of Saturn, was first spotted by Huygens in 1655 with his homemade telescope. As a result, Saturn joined Jupiter as the only other planet except Earth with a detectable moon (Galileo Galilei had already discovered the four largest moons of Jupiter in 1610). In addition, because of to the enhanced clarity of his telescope, he was able to confirm that what Galileo had mistakenly labeled Saturn’s “ears” were, in reality, the planet’s rings.

    Drawing of Saturn, made by Christiaan Huygens
    Drawing of Saturn, made by Christiaan Huygens. Credit: Leiden University Library.

    The inexplicable disappearance of the rings every 14 years, Huygens discovered, was owing to the fact that they were then viewed precisely from the side, but were too thin to be seen from Earth, proving that the rings had no connection to the planet.

    Huygens also resolved the brightest portion of the Orion Nebula as an extended luminous zone, and he discovered the rotational motion of Mars and calculated the rotation period (Martian day) at roughly 24 hours. The Huygens Region is another name for this area. He proposed that Venus was shrouded in clouds and identified many nebulas and double star systems. The fifth largest impact crater on Mars also bears his name (Huygens Crater).

    Mechanics, Pendulum Clocks and Exoplanets

    Christiaan Huygens constructed one of the earliest pendulum clocks, and his book on the pendulum, Horologium Oscillatorium, published in 1673, is on display in the Museum Boerhaave in Leiden, Netherlands.
    Christiaan Huygens constructed one of the earliest pendulum clocks, and his book on the pendulum, Horologium Oscillatorium, published in 1673, is on display in the Museum Boerhaave in Leiden, Netherlands.

    Huygens’s passions extended beyond astronomy to include mechanics. He worked on the law of inertia and centrifugal forces, and he developed the laws of impact. With the knowledge he gained from studying oscillations and pendulum motions, Huygens was able to create accurate pendulum clocks. Even though he never really constructed it, Galileo had indeed planned a clock like that. However, Huygens was able to submit a patent application for his timepiece. Salomon Coster’s clocks, which he commissioned, were more accurate to within 10 seconds each day; this was a level of precision that wasn’t matched for another century. Subsequently, he built pocket timepieces that used hairsprings and balancing wheels.

    Using the knowledge that the evolute of a cycloid is again a cycloid, Christiaan Huygens was able to publish a very precise pendulum clock using a cycloidal pendulum in his work Horologium Oscillatorium in 1673. However, the benefit of improved precision in his design was outweighed by the drawback of bigger friction.

    Traité de la lumière (1690).
    Traité de la lumière (1690).

    Even more recently, Huygens was identified as the creator of the first known clock for estimating longitude, which included numerous ground-breaking approaches. In 1690, Huygens published his last scientific work, in which he theorized that extrasolar planets and life may be commonplace in the cosmos.

    The accurate derivation of the principles of elastic impact, using a principle of relativity, can also be traced back to Huygens (Galilean transformation). Published in 1669 (in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), and posthumously published in 1703 (in De Motu Corporum), his findings date back to the 1650s and rectify the incorrect approach of René Descartes.

    In June 1663, the Royal Society welcomed its first two scientists from outside of England: Christiaan Huygens and Samuel Sorbière (1617-1671). When the French Academy of Sciences was established in 1666, Huygens was named its first director. The great Isaac Newton proclaimed him the most graceful mathematician of his day.

    Huygens’ Work in Probability Theory

    Christiaan Huygens made substantial contributions to the field of probability theory, a branch of mathematics that deals with uncertainty and randomness. In 1657, he published “De ratiociniis in ludo aleae” (On the Calculations in Games of Chance), which laid the foundation for modern probability theory. In this work, he introduced the concept of mathematical expectation and used it to solve various problems related to games of chance, such as dice games and gambling. Huygens’ pioneering work in probability theory provided a rigorous mathematical framework for understanding randomness and has applications in fields ranging from statistics to finance.

    Acoustic

    Huygens found the correlation between the speed of sound, the length of a pipe, and its pitch. He worked hard on mid-tone tuning, and in 1691 he figured out how to split the octave into 31 equal steps to correct the Pythagorean comma error in the tonal system of music.

    Retirement

    Huygens’ health worsened in the 1680s, and he stopped leaving his home as regularly. Christiaan Huygens spent the final years of his life studying the field of music theory. Christiaan Huygens died at The Hague in 1695, single and childless.

    Christiaan Huygens’ Writings

    • 1650 – De Iis Quae Liquido Supernatant (about pieces floating over liquids). (Link)
    • 1651 – Theoremata de Quadratura Hyperboles, Ellipsis et Circuli. (Link)
    • 1654 – De Circuli Magnitudine Inventa. (Link)
    • 1654 – Illustrium Quorundam Problematum Constructiones. (Link)
    • 1655 – Horologium (about the pendulum clock). (Link)
    • 1656 – De Saturni Luna Observatio Nova (Discusses the recent sighting of Saturn’s moon Titan and provides details on its discovery.) (Link)
    • 1656 – De Motu Corporum ex Percussione. (Link)
    • 1657 – De Ratiociniis in Ludo Aleae). (Link)
    • 1659 – Systema Saturnium. (Link)
    • 1659 – De vi Centrifuga. (Link)
    • 1673 – Horologium Oscillatorium Sive de Motu Pendulorum ad Horologia Aptato Demonstrationes Geometricae. (Link)
    • 1684 – Astroscopia Compendiaria Tubi Optici Molimine Liberata. (Link)
    • 1685 – Memoriën aengaende het slijpen van glasen tot verrekijckers. (Link)
    • 1686 – Old Dutch: Kort onderwijs aengaende het gebruijck der horologiën tot het vinden der lenghten van Oost en West. (Link)
    • 1690 – Traité de la Lumière.
    • 1690 – Discours de la Cause de la Pesanteur. (Link)
    • 1691 – Lettre Touchant le Cycle Harmonique. (Link)
    • 1698 – Cosmotheoros.
    • 1703 – Opuscula Posthuma with De Motu Corporum ex Percussione and
    • Descriptio Automati Planetarii.
    • 1724 – Novus Cyclus Harmonicus. (Link)
    • 1728 – Christiani Hugenii Zuilichemii, dum viveret Zelhemii Toparchae, Opuscula Posthuma.

    Bibliography

    1. “Huygens, Christiaan”. Oxford University Press.
    2. “Huygens”. Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
    3. Hugh Aldersey-Williams. (2020). Dutch Light: Christiaan Huygens and the Making of Science in Europe.
    4. Treatise on Light by Christiaan Huygens. Gutenberg.org.
  • Battle of Waterloo: The Final Fight of Napoleon’s the Hundred Days

    Battle of Waterloo: The Final Fight of Napoleon’s the Hundred Days

    On June 18, 1815, not far from Brussels, Napoleon Bonaparte‘s soldiers met the Anglo-Prussian troops of Wellington and Blücher at the Battle of Waterloo. Previously, on March 20, 1815, Napoleon reclaimed control in France (“Hundred Days”) after returning to Paris after escaping from the island of Elba, where he was imprisoned for 11 months. Russian, Austrian, Prussian, and British forces were swiftly sent to the Belgian border in order to initiate an invasion of France. Emperor Napoleon, with his 124,000 men, marched out to confront the foe. Waterloo was the primary confrontation of the battle, and Napoleon lost there, leading to the eventual collapse of the First Empire. Three armies participated in the Battle of Waterloo: Napoleon’s Army of the North (Armée du Nord), a multinational Anglo-allied army under Wellington, and a Prussian army under General Blücher.

    Background of the Battle of Waterloo

    Meanwhile, Louis XVIII and his court reached Flanders, the escapee from Elba, Napoleon made a triumphant arrival in Paris on March 20, 1815, following a careful strategy of avoiding the most royalist districts. Rather then take him to Paris in chains, the soldiers joined him. The dignitaries of the Empire were there to greet Napoleon I as he alighted from his cart, and throughout Paris, tricolor flags waved proudly from every window as he was being carried up to the steps of Tuileries Palace by the masses.

    Following Napoleon’s return to power in 1815, the Great Powers of Europe (Austria, Great Britain, Prussia, and Russia) proclaimed Napoleon an outlaw, and so the War of the Seventh Coalition had begun on March 13, 1815. Austria, the Netherlands, Prussia, Russia, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and a number of German states formed the Seventh Coalition.

    Emperor Napoleon’s return to power was met with celebration, but this should not obscure the serious challenges he was facing. Not all former Empire executives had come forth, and there were widespread suspicions that this imperial restoration was bound to fail. In an effort to keep the most dangerous ministers on his side, Napoleon restored Joseph Fouché’s police ministry, but politically, he needed to give pledges, especially because the Senate was responsible for his removal in 1814.

    Napoleon especially aimed at liberalization; press freedom was restored (although he turned against it), and on April 6 his old adversary Benjamin Constant was given the task of writing a new constitution. In one week, Constant, who had just recently insulted Napoleon in the Journal des Débats, drafted a constitution that would define the new Napoleonic administration: a representative system with a wide electoral base, ministries answerable to the chambers, etc. Even the Chamber of Representatives was called to order by the end of May, and thus, the Additional Act to the Constitutions of the Empire had established a fully liberal system.

    1,300,000 YES votes were cast in the 1815 French constitutional referendum, while only 4,000 NO votes were cast. While it was imperative to focus all efforts on the exterior threats, mainly the Seventh Coalition, Napoleon’s main goal was to avert an internal resistance (the Vendée region was already uprising) by supporting both the Royalists and the Republicans. Former National Convention (a French Revolution parliament) members like Bertrand Barère and other Revolutionary heroes like the Marquis de Lafayette were now serving in the new Chamber of Representatives.

    At the forefront of this group was Jean-Denis Lanjuinais, a critic of Napoleon and one of the first to call for his overthrow in 1814. So, it’s not known whether Napoleon actually acknowledged his diminished power or if he saw this as a temporary compromise that he expected to revert to after the external threats had been eliminated and Napoleon no longer had any challengers at the head of his army. As such, Napoleon needed a swift military victory not merely to remove the foreign threat but also to destroy his political rivals at home.

    Also, Napoleon had to reconnect with his troops and the people in order to get them back on his side. Louis-Nicolas Davout took command of the Ministry of War, which resulted in the recall of soldiers who had been disbanded during the Bourbon Restoration (1814), the conscripts raised in 1815 for Napoleon’s army, the restoring of the National Guards, the Imperial Guard, and the cavalry (to the letdown of the gendarmes, who were now forced to patrol on foot), and the formation and deployment of VIII Corps (Grande Armée) with a focus on the northern and eastern borders.

    In order to counter the Seventh Coalition with the strength of 700,000, Napoleon planned to muster 800,000 soldiers by the end of the year. Napoleon Bonaparte also sorted through the marshals who hadn’t been faithful to him and reorganized the top of the army. By the end of it all, just Louis-Gabriel SuchetMichel NeyLouis-Nicolas Davout, and Jean-de-Dieu Soult remained under Napoleon, along with a newly promoted name, Emmanuel de Grouchy who will be decisive in the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo.

    A conflict with the Seventh Coalition is inevitable

    napoleon 1815 france the Seventh Coalition 3
    The Seventh Coalition rallies. (Map: The Waterloo Association)

    Along with this military display, Napoleon also wanted to detach his father-in-law, the Emperor of Austria Francis I, from the coalition, but Austrian Foreign Minister Metternich made it clear that they would never ally with Napoleon regardless. Napoleon suffered another setback in Italy when his key ally, the Napoleonic King of Naples, Joachim Murat, who previously betrayed him during the Fall of Napoleon in 1814, tried to take the Italian peninsula on his own to atone for his actions against Napoleon, but he was defeated by the Austrian army under Neipperg.

    Thus, the peaceful rhetoric that Napoleon was attempting to convey to the Seventh Coalition countries was now broken as a consequence of Murat’s hasty move. It became clear to the coalition that a violent Napoleonic showdown was, in fact, imminent. On June 1, 1804, Napoleon organized a grand event in the Champ de Mai to mark his return.

    Planning of the battle

    To impose himself on his political opponents while on his way to Paris, Napoleon wanted a decisive victory against an uncompromising external threat. A number of campaign plans were proposed against the Seventh Coalition, including an April assault, then a defensive battle in Paris and Lyon, or an offensive in June. Napoleon decided on the latter. Because Brussels was surrounded by the Duke of Wellington’s Anglo-Dutch forces, Namur by Blücher’s Prussians, and Moscow and Vienna were too far away to help them.

    If Napoleon were to launch an offensive in June, he could be able to catch Wellington and Blücher’s Prussians off guard before they launch an assault first. If Napoleon were to win decisively over these two armies, it wouldn’t be the last of the Seventh Coalition (the Austrians and Russians would still be standing), but he believed it would be enough of a shock to get them back to the negotiation table as soon as possible.

    And if the offensive approach against Paris and Lyon were to fail, the defensive strategy was always an option. To prepare for this possibility, Napoleon stationed 25,000 more soldiers in Alsace to confront the Austrians. It has been argued that this extreme caution by Napoleon was a mistake since it prevented him from committing the whole force of the Empire to the decisive Battle of Waterloo in Belgium.

    On June 14, Napoleon arrived in Belgium with 124,000 men and 370 cannons. His plan to defeat Wellington’s 95,000 soldiers and 186 guns with the Prussians’ 124,000 soldiers and 312 cannons was to separate their forces to compensate for the significant numerical deficit.

    The French army crossed the Sambre River in three columns on June 15, 1815, after having successfully surrounded the city of Charleroi in Belgium and driven out opposing detachments. Napoleon’s plan was to strike at the Prussians first, as they might threaten his flank if the British intervened on their side. As the French General Grouchy repelled the Prussian advance at Fleurus, Napoleon sent Marshal Michel Ney to Quatre Bras to hold the British.

    The battles of Ligny and Quatre Bras

    Battle of Ligny 2
    Battle of Ligny (Credit: Theodore Yung)

    On the night of June 15–16, the Duke of Wellington realized that the French assault was primarily directed against the Prussian army. He devised a plan to shock the French forces by having the Prussians act as an “anvil,” keeping Napoleon’s soldiers pinned down around Ligny, and allowing Wellington to land the “hammer.” The British struck the French flanks at the Battle of Quatre Bras while Napoleon and Grouchy marched to confront the Prussians at the Battle of Ligny.

    With the oppressive heat and humidity, Napoleon decided to make an assault on the Prussian center while expecting Ney to take the Quatre Bras and then strike the Prussian flank. But under the command of Wellington, the British resisted, and Ney failed to take the Quatre Bras in time. It was now too late for Ney to help Napoleon.

    Marshal d’Erlon’s corps might have played a crucial role that day, but they were stuck between the battles due to the conflicting instructions of Napoleon and Ney, and thus they ended up not fighting in either.

    The day ended with the Prussians being defeated by Napoleon but not destroyed. Prussian General Blücher was thrown to the ground by the Imperial Guard and Baptiste Milhaud’s cuirassiers. He was knocked unconscious while the French cavalrymen rode right by him, and he spent the next ten minutes laying behind the French lines until riding back to join his army on a British Dragoon Guard’s horse. Wellington withdrew to the defensive position of Mont-Saint-Jean in Belgium, the last open ground for battle before Brussels, before the Soignes Forest, while the Prussian army retreated to Wavre. The Prussians lost between 12,000 to 20,000, killed or wounded, compared to 6,500 to 8,500 on the French side.

    Lady Butler, Quatre Bras, 1815.
    Quatre Bras, Lady Butler, 1815.

    Napoleon later said that Wellington had made a poor decision by deciding to fight in this area since he could not have made a well-planned escape via the woodland massif had he been defeated. Napoleon continued his advance on the 17th, this time heading for Mont-Saint-Jean, and gave Grouchy and his 30,000 soldiers the mission of pursuing the Prussians.

    Napoleon pictured several possibilities, but his instructions were still vague about how to act. It was also unclear to Grouchy whether Blücher would choose to join Wellington or withdraw to his lines of communication to the east. The French were right behind the English rearguard, cannoning them with artillery and sabering with cavalry. Even worse, violent thunderstorms broke out in the area, soaking the sunken roads and fields. These storms proved invaluable to the defenders, as they delayed Napoleon’s assault on June 18 and weakened the French artillery as cannonballs sank in the mud rather than ricocheting through the enemy ranks.

    The Battle of Waterloo

    battle of waterloo painting
    Battle of Waterloo by William Sadler

    The Anglo-Dutch-Belgians had 85,000 troops on the day of the conflict, minus the 17,000 detached, for a total of around 68,000 men and 184 guns. There were 127,000 Prussian soldiers. The French, however, fielded just 74,000 soldiers and 266 guns for the Battle of Waterloo.

    The British army was poised for war on June 18, 1815 at first light. Wellington had taken a defensive stance. He deployed his men along the whole 1,9 miles (3 km) of Mont-Saint-Jean, hiding them slightly below the ridge line from the heavy French guns. British artillery was stationed atop the ridge, ready to rain destruction down on any infantry columns that dared attempt to scale the plateau. Finally, Wellington positioned soldiers around three farmhouses on the hill to break the momentum of these assault columns: the Hougoumont farm on the British right-wing (to the west), the La Haye Sainte farm in the middle, and the Papelotte farm on the left wing (to the east).

    Almost half a mile to the south, the French soldiers awoke. Yes, the French troops, like the rest of the Seventh Coalition, had slept outside in the rain. Napoleon and his staff ate breakfast together at the Caillou at 8:00 in the morning. Charles Reille, who had fought with Wellington in Spain (Battle of Vitoria), strongly advocated against a frontal assault because of Wellington’s policy of relying on artillery via relatively thin infantry lines. However, a frontal assault was part of Napoleon’s strategy; after waiting for the sodden terrain to dry up a little due to the weather, he was planning to make an attack on the enemy center with his strong artillery. Just like at Ligny, the temperature quickly got hot and humid.

    It wasn’t until 11.30 a.m. that the cannonade began, and it wasn’t particularly effective since the French guns were so far away (around 4,000 ft or 1,200 m) and most of the British forces were hidden behind the ridge. When Napoleon gave the order to assault the Hougoumont farm in order to distract the British army before attacking the center, his brother, Prince Jerome, operated this initial assault. The position was defended by a Scottish Lieutenant-Colonel, James Macdonnell, who was in charge of 200 Coldstream Guards and 1,000 Germans from Nassau. The fighting was ferocious. The defenders had constructed a fortification around the farm, complete with a wall 6,5 feet (2 meters) high that is riddled with small gaps just like a castle.

    Hougoumont farm
    Nassau troops at Hougoumont farm. (Credit: Jan Hoynck van Papendrecht)

    Lieutenant Legros of the “1st Léger” was able to use an axe to smash through the southern gate and lead a small group of French soldiers into the farm’s fence, but the defenders quickly reopened the gate and slaughtered them. The French left wing wasted their time attempting to capture this secondary objective as Wellington dispatched troops to protect the farm. The defenders lost just 1,000 men during these attacks, while 5,000 Frenchmen died. The British referred to the area in front of the farmhouse as the “killing ground” because of the large number of bodies that had been left there.

    When the first part of the fight was over, Napoleon moved on to the second phase, which included attacking the heart of the enemy’s defenses. Napoleon had General Grouchy retreat because the first Prussian forces were already spotted. Starting at 1:30 p.m., the French infantry launched an assault on the Prussian center, beginning with a furious artillery duel that drove the Dutch-Belgians up the hill and onto the plateau and the defenders of the La Haye Sainte into a defensive encampment. Knowing Wellington’s firepower-based plan, General d’Erlon avoided forming compact columns in favor of extended lines. Wellington’s left flank was threatened when General Durutte advanced all the way to the Papelotte farm.

    But the British (consisting of veterans of the Spanish War) and Hanoverian forces halted the French attack on the ridge by bombarding the exhausted grognards (Napoleon’s Imperial Guards) who had just scaled the plateau. British General Thomas Picton even tried to mount a counterattack, but a musket ball shot him in the head. Wellington’s 1st and 2nd Life Guards, assisted by General Ponsomby’s Dragoon Guards, swooped down on the French General Marcognet division and forced it back to capture the left flank.

    the-Battle-of-Waterloo
    The Royal Scots Greys cavalry on the charge. “Scotland Forever!” by Lady Butler, 1881.

    However, the British cavalry, initially failed in discipline, later caught in the momentum of the Royal Scots Greys cavalry, and continued their push despite the order to withdraw, sabering the French artillery before being caught in a pincer movement by the lancers of Martiguez and the Cuirassiers of Jacques Travers and suffer heavy losses. General Ponsonby was wounded by a spear but survived with the help of a French soldier.

    With the French central assault failing, the Battle of Waterloo entered its third phase at approximately 3:30 p.m., when French artillery began bombarding the La Haye Sainte in preparation for an attack. Several German battalions retreated for cover, but Ney mistook this action for a massive withdrawal. At 4 p.m., he ordered his cavalry to launch a full-scale attack on the enemy’s central stronghold, with Milhaud’s Cuirassiers leading the way. Wellington’s core and right flank saw the gleaming mass of army approaching and organized into around thirty squares in four rows, forming walls of bayonets against the cavalries of the French.

    These infantry squares were fortified by British artillery, which answered the arrival of the French cavalry with deadly fire. Next came the salvos of the infantry, who were provoked to maintain their ground by commanders yelling from the heart of the squares. The batteries were overrun, but although Ney led ferocious attacks for two hours, the British squares held firm. These valiant attacks ultimately failed catastrophically, and Napoleon was frequently blamed for not launching the troops to back up Ney’s cavalry. The remnants of the British cavalry, led by the Earl of Uxbridge (Henry Paget), gave pursuit to the fleeing French.

    Nonetheless, the French infantry was far from idle. The French troops in the southeast were about to confront the approaching Prussians under Friedrich von Bülow, who was closing in on the French Imperial Army’s rear. On the front lines, no one was told about this dreadful news, but they were informed that French General Grouchy was on his way for support. At 6 p.m., combat broke out in the village of Plancenoit, forcing Napoleon to call in the Young Guard, assisted by two battalions of the Old Guard, and ultimately retaking the village of Plancenoit for the French. The French leader Quiot and his troops stormed the Sainte Farm and took it when the defenders ran out of ammunition, as Napoleon had instructed Ney to do so. With the farm’s seizure, French artillery was able to move closer to the British center to unleash a bombardment.

    waterloo british Hussars
    “Waterloo”. Painting by Denis Dighton (1792–1827). British Hussars of Viviene’s Brigade.

    On the other hand, French General Durutte dealt significant damage to the British left flank. Wellington’s situation was dire; his defenses were about to collapse, his cavalry had been wiped out, his supplies were running short, and the Cumberland Hussars had already abandoned the field. “Night or the Prussians must come!” the British commander cried out in desperation. The night was still hours away, but Napoleon knew the Prussian threat was real. The battlefield situation had deteriorated to the point of paralysis, and Napoleon was unable to deploy the reinforcements Ney had been pleading for. Napoleon formed a square with his men on the route to Brussels and sent the Guard to clear Plancenoit.

    Seeking the improbable

    Sir Arthur Wellesley 1st Duke of Wellington
    Sir Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington.

    Then Napoleon could either move back while his Imperial Guard covered the retreat, or he might risk all in a last attack. But Napoleon could only try option two because of the political and strategic need for a victory. At 7 o’clock in the evening, the Imperial Guard launched its last attack, sending 9 battalions to the plateau to clear it of enemy forces. Similarly, Wellington hastily rushed to bolster his center with all of his available reserves. Ney routed the assault columns in the same direction as the cavalry, leaving them vulnerable to the artillery, whereas taking the road to Brussels would have been a safer option. Napoleon’s Imperial Guard advanced in a line up the ridge, showing off their hard training. But after taking a deadly barrage from the British 5th Brigade, the Imperial Guard initially halted but later drove the defenders back.

    The British defenses were on the verge of collapse, but the arrival of the Dutch reinforcements on the second line actually stabilized the situation. And after taking heavy damage from British artillery and the subsequent salvo fire, the Imperial Guard withdrew for the first time in its history. The remainder of the Guard, facing the British, was also wiped out by the salvo fires dropped at about 82 ft (25 m). British Colonel John Colborne placed his soldiers in a long line to the left of the French onslaught, giving them an unobstructed field of fire that annihilated the Imperial Guard.

    With shouts of “The Guard retreats. Run for your life!” spreading panic through the French lines, the French fled to the base of the plateau, and Wellington ordered his forces to advance. After having five horses killed beneath him during the combat, Ney yelled to the British 95th Regiment, “Come and see how a Marshal of France meets his death!” Napoleon and his three battalions of Old Guard were positioned around 330 feet (100 meters) from La Haye Sainte. Several memorialists, including the well-known Jean-Roch Coignet, attested to Ney’s desperation and desire to die on the battlefield.

    Napoleon, giving up, retreated toward La Belle Alliance. The French General Cambronne confronted the English while they invited him to surrender. He famously, and allegedly, answered the English by saying “The Guard dies, it does not surrender.” The village of Plancenoit was still held, but the battalions couldn’t stand any longer against the British army corps. The withdrawal was ordered by Napoleon. The only orderly retreat was made by the Old Guard, who formed two squares and moved backward at a walk. Plancenoit fell to the Prussians at 9 p.m., and Blücher and Wellington met up at La Belle Alliance. Blücher wanted this place to become the name of the battle, but Wellington preferred the village of Waterloo, where his headquarters were found.

    The Battle of Waterloo shattered Napoleon’s reputation forever. According to scholars, Napoleon suffered from painful hemorrhoids since the beginning of the Battle of Waterloo, which stopped him from riding his horse to properly survey the battlefield. But obviously, given the Battle of Waterloo’s outcome, these factors cannot account for the loss on their own. The retreat turned into a debacle. Napoleon lost his ceremonial coat, his treasures, and one of his hats. 

    “Take no prisoners!” That was the Prussian order. 20,000 French soldiers were killed or injured, including seven French generals. Roughly the same number of Coalition soldiers were killed or injured on the opposing side. This number included 7,000 Prussians. The remaining French troops marched towards Charleroi and then Paris through Laon.

    Grouchy’s role in the Battle of Waterloo

    Napoleon and his generals blamed Emmanuel de Grouchy for the loss of the Battle of Waterloo. His inexperience, slowness to respond, and lack of initiative were held against him. Gerard had ordered him to “march to the sound of the guns” at Waterloo to help Napoleon, but he had intentionally held his soldiers back and not joined Napoleon.

    While Napoleon fought at Mont-Saint-Jean, Grouchy went for the Blücher’s Prussians instead, foolishly believing he was still completing his order of stopping the Prussians to join forces with the British. But in reality, Grouchy had faced just one Prussian corps at Wavre instead of four, which the Saxon Thielmann left behind. It was 6 p.m. on this pivotal day when he finally realized it.

    Since Grouchy failed to hold Prussians back at the Wavre, Napoleon’s army was overwhelmed at Waterloo with Wellington and Blücher’s forces joined together.

    Thielmann had accomplished his goal of keeping Grouchy away from the Battle of Waterloo by successfully blocking him in the city of Wavre. The new order that Grouchy received on the 18th was not clear either. It ordered him to continue the combat in Wavre and at the same time to pursue the Prussians toward Waterloo. It was written in pencil and was partly illegible, so no one could tell whether or not the battle had been “engaged” or “won” in Waterloo. Because it would have taken 3 hours for the 1 a.m. order to reach Grouchy, some argue that Grouchy would not have been able to close the 9.3-mile (15-km) gap between himself and Napoleon before the battle in Waterloo ended.

    Once the Battle of Waterloo was finally lost, Grouchy was given the command to return to France through Namur. Grouchy at least deserves recognition for safely returning his army to French soil without losing a single member of his unit.

    When the Battle of Waterloo lost, the Napoleonic government lost

    battles of Ligny

    Within 10 days, Napoleon aimed to muster enough soldiers to mount a defense, as previously planned. Napoleon wanted to assemble 80,000 to 100,000 troops if he could rapidly rally the corps of Grouchy, Jean Rapp, and the Army of the Loire. Enough to delay the coalition forces for long, Napoleon raised a tremendous army, bringing the total number of soldiers fighting for him to 800,000. To expand his constitutional dominion, however, he needed the support of the deputies. But, he had no idea that Joseph Fouché (the Minister of Police), having learned about the Waterloo defeat on June 19, was already attempting to persuade the deputies that Napoleon must abdicate.

    Napoleon regrouped his army around the city of Philippeville and gave the command to Jean-de-Dieu Soult while Emmanuel de Grouchy was still fighting at Wavre. Napoleon then went ahead to organize the defense of Paris as he knew that he could only have an influence on the deputies if he stood there in Paris during the invasion.

    The Napoleonic forces were successful in their operations in Belgium against the Vendée insurgents (War in the Vendée), and in the East, Marshal Suchet repelled the Piedmontese attack and advanced on Geneva. After all, there was still hope. Although his brother Lucien was a skilled politician, Napoleon was unable to maintain the support of the Chambers. Attempting to seize dictatorial power to oversee the last stages of the campaign, he still failed.

    Lucien Bonaparte insisted that dissolving the Chambers was the only option, but Napoleon was uninterested, and the Chamber had proclaimed that any effort to do so would constitute high treason.

    Lazare Carnot advised Napoleon to proclaim a national emergency and mobilize the National Guards in order to regain the momentum of 1792 and 1793 and to fortify his position behind the Loire River in preparation for a counterattack. However, Napoleon’s advisor, Caulaincourt, explained that all would be for naught if Paris were to fall.

    There was still a strong sense of patriotism and will to resist in Northern and Eastern France, where students as young as sixteen were forming artillery companies, including units of snipers called “francs-tireurs” like Colonel Viriot’s “Corps Francs,” who flew a black flag with a skull and crossbones bearing the words “The Terror precedes us. Death follows us.” Patriotic support was actually on the rise, even in historically unsupportive areas like Puy-de-Dôme, where people donated harnessed horses to the army.

    Although only partially, France appeared capable of rising against the Seventh Coalition Army. While the general uprising had its benefits, it also had its drawbacks. The federal associations that were previously formed had brought together not only the Bonapartists but also the “Patriots of 1789” and “Terrorists of 1793,” who were committed to preventing the Bourbon Restoration, but they were not loyal to the imperial monarchy either.

    And added to all this, the majority of French people were actually weary of the conflicts of the Revolution and the Empire, and they were desiring peace quickly. There was reluctance to deploy mobile guards in several areas, including Ariège, Haute-Loire, and Oise. Having been burned by 1814, the France of 1815 was quite different from the France of 1792. The peasants had fled before the approach of the Seventh Coalition, and the cities had not put up a violent opposition. Worse, not only in the Vendée but across the country, there was outspoken royalist support. Some royalists were already plotting a tyrannicide behind the scenes to assassinate Napoleon; provincial lords were bribing the mobilized troops, and businesspeople were even hoping King Louis XVIII would return so that they could resume profitable commerce with England again.

    Napoleon was unable to enforce military recruitments in the face of widespread opposition; inexperienced prefects had been appointed during the political cleansing of the Hundred Days, and many royalist mayors had been allowed to stay in post in the communes.

    Napoleon’s political situation had stalled, and Fouché was already making plans for the post-Empire era. The Chamber of Representatives granted itself sovereign rights and forced Napoleon to abdicate or face a coup. 

    In the face of the civil war threat and despite the support of a portion of the Parisian population that came to demonstrate its love for Napoleon in the vicinity of the Élysée, Napoleon, not wanting to turn into the “King of a Jacquerie” (a popular revolt of the 14th century), abdicated on June 22, 1815, withdrawing to Château de Malmaison.

    Then, Carnot, Grenier, Caulaincourt, and Quinette formed a temporary government, with Fouché as their leader. Although Napoleon’s son Napoleon II was the disputed new Emperor of France, Fouché already had the support of the English on the capitulation of Paris and the restoration of the Bourbons.

    The defense of Paris

    The march of the Seventh Coalition to Paris was littered with battles, some of which went in favor of the French but which had since been forgotten due to the lack of strategic significance in the shadow of Waterloo’s devastating defeat. On June 20th, Grouchy won a decisive victory against the Prussians, who had been tailing him for too long.

    Le Quesnoy, guarded by the National Guard, fell to the Coalition forces on the 26th. On the 27th, d’Erlon gained a decisive victory against Ziethen’s Prussians at Compiègne, while Bülow took both Senlis and Creil. After the Coalition soldiers prevailed on all fronts on June 28, Blücher planned to assault Paris from the north on June 30 as they were around 30 miles (50 km) away from the capital. But after being driven back by the Parisian defenses, Blücher regrouped to the west and south of Paris.

    Food and ammunition were not an issue for Davout in Paris, and he was confident in his ability to resist Blücher. Nonetheless, Davout was well aware of the immediate need for a second restoration of Louis XVIII. He sent Isidore Exelmans’ second cavalry corps to quell the Prussians’ will. There were 16 Dragoon, 6 Hussar, and 8 light Imperial Guard cavalry squadrons along with the 4 battalions of the 44th Line Infantry Regiment ready for a charge.

    Colonel Sohr’s brigade was smashed by Exelmans’ surprise attack on their way to Vélizy, where they had a numerical advantage of seven to one (about 5,000 to 750). After losing the fight, Colonel Sohr and 300 of his troops were captured. 

    After the Prussian vanguard was defeated at Rocquencourt, the Belgium campaign came to an end three days later with the signing of an armistice. However, the war in France continued, and the Château de Vincennes was not given up until November 15, 1815, when General Daumesnil agreed to do so.

    For his part, Napoleon traveled to Rochefort after proposing, in vain, to assume command of the Government Commission’s armed forces as a mere general. For a long time, Napoleon had hoped to be able to escape into exile in America, but on July 3 he found out that he had been denied and the British navy was blocking the coast. Since Napoleon knew that Fouché might hand him to the royalists, he surrendered to the English in the hopes that they would be more forgiving. Napoleon waited on the Island of Aix as Louis XVIII entered Paris on July 8, marking the second restoration of King Louis XVIII. On July 14, Napoleon embarked on the Bellerophon and made his way to Plymouth before setting sail for Saint Helena, the burial place of the Emperor, where Napoleon died from stomach cancer on 5 May 1821.

    The legacy of the Battle of Waterloo

    Within a short time, the Battle of Waterloo had become a cultural touchstone, remembered by every participant. And thus, on June 18th, Wellington held a feast to celebrate the triumph, which continued until 1857. Waterloo has been honored by the naming of several public structures, including barracks and a well-known London Waterloo Train Station.

    Napoleon’s final battle, the Battle of Waterloo was as brutal as it was spoken about. The accounts of the combat were recorded in the memoirs of the participants, such as Marcellin Marbot. In addition, Napoleon’s own account of his failed political endeavor in the Belgian lowlands was published in 1823 in the Memorial of Saint Helena. This imperial epic worthy of the ancient tragedies became the bedtime reading of a generation of young romantics bored by the blandness of their own era.

    Despite being a staunch royalist and previously a firm enemy of Napoleon, the writer Chateaubriand became a passionate supporter of Napoleon and delivered the narrative of how he went through the Battle of Waterloo. Victor Hugo succeeded Chateaubriand in continuing to deliver more Napoleonic memories. Exiled following Napoleon III’s coup in 1853, Hugo composed the most beautiful verses and, perhaps, the most renowned lines about the Battle of Waterloo in his Les Châtiments (“Castigations”):

    Waterloo! Waterloo! disastrous field!
    Like a wave swelling in an urn brim-filled,
    Your ring of hillsides, valleys, woods and heath
    Saw grim battalions snarled in pallid death.
    On this side France, against her Europe stood:
    God failed the heroes in the clash of blood!
    Fate played the coward, victory turned tail.
    O Waterloo, alas! I weep, I fail!
    Those last great soldiers of the last great war
    Were giants, each the whole world's conqueror:
    Crossed Alps and Rhine, made twenty tyrants fall.
    Their soul sang in the brazen bugle-call!
    
    —Les Châtiments ("Castigations,") translated by the English poet and translator Timothy Adès

    After going out of his way to visit the battlefield of Waterloo in 1861, Victor Hugo wrote a collection of poems named “The Legend of the Ages,” which included “The Emperor’s Return.”

    Erckmann-Chatrian‘s most popular historical fiction, Waterloo, was published in 1865 during the Second French Empire, which followed the previous Histoire d’un Conscrit de 1813 (The History Of A Conscript Of 1813). They added a touch of epic and reality to this work in a style that has been defined as rustic realism, in which basic and familiar individuals become heroes of the epic.

    Among the founders of realism in European literature, Balzac also planned to write on the history of the Napoleonic Wars and the tragic myth of Waterloo.

    References

    1. The Champ de Mai · Napoleon’s 100 Days
    2. David Hamilton-Williams, (1993), “Waterloo New Perspectives: The Great Battle Reappraised.”
    3. J. Christopher Herold, (1967), “The Battle of Waterloo.”
    4. Victor Hugo, (1862), “Chapter VII: Napoleon in a Good Humor”, Les Misérables.
    5. Brown University Library, “Napoleonic Satires.”
    6. Bernard Cornwell, (2015), “Waterloo: The History of Four Days, Three Armies and Three Battles.”
  • Pompey: The Only Rival Worthy of Caesar

    Pompey: The Only Rival Worthy of Caesar

    Pompey, a prominent Roman commander and politician, was born in the Italian city of Picenum on September 27, 106 BC. He was murdered at Pelusium in Egypt on September 28th, 48 BC. With Caesar and Crassus, Pompey created the First Triumvirate, although he was ultimately destroyed by Caesar at the Battle of Pharsalus in 48 BC. Pompey or Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus born into a wealthy plebeian family, earned the moniker “the Great” due to his outstanding military achievements. However, his competition with Caesar, previously allied, would ultimately be his undoing. Pompey was a well-respected Roman commander and politician. The Civil War that broke out in 49 BC would turn him into Julius Caesar‘s biggest antagonist, despite the fact that he was married to Caesar’s daughter Julia.

    Pompey was a ruthless and brazen man, typical of the world’s elite. His innate or cultivated amiability, however, won the hearts of many.

    pompey face
    The reconstruction of Pompey the Great by Alessandro Tomasi.

    Pompey’s early life

    Pompey was born to a noble family and a demanding and harsh father. Pompey’s father was Cnaeus Pompeius Strabo, a substantial general in the Roman army. Pompeius Strabo stood out throughout the Social War (91-87 BC) because of his stubborn character. Thus, his funeral pyre was met with ridicule as the townsfolk despised him and burned his body.

    Pompey followed his father and developed an interest in the military and strategic planning. His father’s wealth and extensive clients led Pompey to meet with Sulla. By that time, Sulla was in charge of the Optimates, the traditional political group that staunchly defended the privileges of the old nobility. While Gaius Marius, the head of the progressive Populares faction, had high hopes for the young Julius Caesar, nephew of his wife Julia, Pompey still remained a bright young guy in his eyes.

    Since Pompey was trained for battle since he was young, it is only logical that he would first commit to a successful military career. Almost immediately, the politician Syula took notice of him, and he went on to battle in Africa and Sicily with successful campaigns in the Far East, Hispania, and against Mediterranean pirates.

    Aeschylus’s blunt quote, “I hate the sire, but dearly love this child of his,” serves as the first line in Plutarch’s biography of Pompey the Great.

    Pompey rose through the ranks of the Roman military and eventually became Emperor. With Caesar and Crassus, Pompey formed the triumvirate that ruled Rome beginning in 60 BC. Pompey married Caesar’s daughter, and the three of them ruled the whole Roman lands.

    It was because of his efforts to bring back order in Rome that Pompey was named sole consul in 52 BC. But three years later, a civil war erupted, putting Pompey against Caesar. The latter was even designated an enemy of Rome by that time. After being soundly beaten by Caesar in Greece in the legendary Battle of Pharsalus, Pompey was assassinated on an Egyptian beach.

    After the Pharsalus, Pompey had sought refuge with Ptolemy, King of Egypt, but Ptolemy ultimately betrayed him, killed him and gave his head to Caesar. Pompey was a military hero who also founded towns like Nicopolis and Pompeiopolis. He also created the Theatre of Pompey in Rome.

    Rome during Pompey

    pompey

    The political systems of the city-state of Rome were in need of a revival because of the decline of the Republic in comparison to the vast geography of the Empire. The collapse of this political system paved the way for constant civil wars and provided the ideal environment for the power grabs of the ambitious. Pompey was a ruthless and brazen man, typical of the world’s elite. His innate or cultivated amiability, however, won him many friends and admirers. And he was looking good, too. His demeanor was courteous, and his eyes were a mix of softness and fervor. Pompey was quite popular with the ladies, and the stunningly beautiful famous courtesan Flora was completely smitten with him.

    These deadly good looks were complemented by a rebellious strand of hair that was lifted by a spike on the forehead, giving him phony Alexander airs. After the successful campaigns he commanded in Africa in 81 BC against Marius’s supporters, his warriors took to calling him “Magnus” (Great) in honor of this trait and his military prowess in reference to Alexander the Great. This distinction was one that Pompey gladly accepted, revealing much about his aspirations.

    Insolence that portends disaster

    Despite the norms, Pompey still planned to ride a tank hauled by African elephants around Rome during the celebration of his victory. He was more of a strategist than a scenographer, and thus he failed to foresee that his excessively imposing chariot would prevent him from entering the city. Being ridiculed might be fatal in ancient Rome, but not to a man of his type.

    In 79 BC, Pompey was just 26 years old. Despite being a member of the equestrian order (the lower Roman nobility), Pompey was so confident in his triumphs that he petitioned the Senate for the magistracy of consul, an honor normally reserved for the senatorial class. His teacher Sulla (who served as dictator in 82–79 BC) thought this request was a sign of arrogance and bad luck, so he decided to distance himself from Pompey.

    When it became clear that Pompey would no longer have the backing of the optimates’ leader, he moved to support the election of Sulla’s opponent, Marcus Aemilius Lepidus. For Sulla, Aemilius Lepidus was a filthy provoker. However, this coincidental union did not survive for very long. Aemilius Lepidus revolted against the Senate and in return, Pompey suppressed this rebellion with an army raised from Picenum. After defeating Aemilius Lepidus on the battlefield, Pompey removed him from power the next year.

    A path to victory

    When the Spartacus revolt broke out in the city of Capua, Pompey arrested 6,000 rebels and had them crucified one every 108 feet (33 meters) along the route leading from Rome to Capua. The commander hoped to send a message to the slaves to discourage them from trying to escape.

    Pompey resumed his Hispanic campaign in 77 BC. His new mission was to put down the rebellion led by another Marius admirer. Following a string of close engagements, General Pompey finally delivered a decisive defeat to Sertorius. He put up a monument to himself atop Col du Perthus (Perthus Pass) as a last act of egotism before departing the Iberian Peninsula. According to his inscription, Pompey had conquered 87 cities. Surely he totaled even the tiniest villages along his route.

    Even though the Romans had been humbled by revolts for months, but the victor of Sertorius had not yet departed Spain. While trying to flee, Spartacus and his band of 100,000 slaves completely routed the army. Even a seasoned general like Crassus had run into trouble. In 73 BC, he received assistance from Pompey and Lucullus. Most of the rebels were eliminated by their forces. Capturing 6,000, Pompey then had one crucified every 108 feet (33 meters) along the route from Rome to Capua, where the uprising had begun.

    The commander hoped to send a message to the slaves that would discourage them from trying to escape. In Rome, people did not question the authority of rulers. So, it was another one of Pompey’s clever “stunts” when he publicly earned credit for putting down the Spartacus rebellion.

    Pompey’s hopes for absolute power were now bolstered by this fresh triumph, and he quickly took advantage of the admiration to which he was subject in Rome to make another consulate submission while failing to fulfill the requisite conditions once again. But the senate had to make an exception for Pompey because of how popular he was, and therefore, Pompey and Crassus were both chosen Roman consuls (prime ministers) in 70 BC.

    Despite their election, the two men first hesitated to dismiss their troops which created fear of a new civil war. But, too much blood had already been spilled, and so the two consuls decided to simultaneously demobilize their legionaries. But this did not signify a permanent abandonment of their goals, rather, it was only a temporary pause.

    Pompey’s wars against the pirates and Mithridates

    Battle of Korakesion 67 BC pompey vs pirates
    At the Battle of Korakesion, 67 BC, Pompey with 200 ships faced the pirates of the Mediterranean with 1,000 ships in modern-day Alanya, Turkey.

    Pompey used his naval prowess to once again make a name for himself in 67 BC. The Gabinian Law granted Pompey extraordinary authority, the imperium. He was therefore endowed with the authority to completely wipe out the Mediterranean’s piracy problem. Their attacks hampered commerce and threatened Italy’s food supply, as much of their wheat originated in Egypt. With his fleet of 200 vessels, Pompey was able to effectively eliminate the pirate threat and square up the maritime space in just three months. Now a hero in the eyes of the Athenians, Pompey then established some of the reformed pirates in Soli, in modern-day Turkey. He planned to turn those pirates into farmers by placing them far from the sea. But the city of Soli was destroyed by Mithridates, and yet there was a request for revival by its inhabitants. So, Pompey rebuilt the city and named it “Pompeiopolis.”

    The lawmaker Gaius Manilius then gave Pompey the chance to steer the war against the king of Pontus, Mithridates VI Eupator, a few months after this victory. Mithridates’ reign of terror in the East was a direct result of his refusal to abide by the terms of his treaty with Rome. Pompey was given free rein to eradicate this threat from the East and restore peace to the area.

    He defeated King Mithridates’ soldiers with a daring nighttime assault in the Battle of the Lycus in 66 BC. In the East, Pompey kept pushing forward. Some, like Armenia’s King Tigran, chose to work with Pompey rather than oppose him. However, many other kinglets met their end because they were too egotistical to take the diplomatic route. The ever-victorious General Pompey brought the East to its knees and annexed the territories of Pontus and Bithynia on the southwestern bank of the Black Sea. Pompey even managed to put the King of Parthia, Phraates III, in a bind.

    General who strikes fear in his subjects

    However, Pompey’s progression did not end there. The Judean rulers came to him to put an end to a power conflict in 63 BC. Pompey saw his chance to crush Judea and took it for his own. On a Saturday, he led his legion into Jerusalem. Since that was a holy day, the Jewish army chose to refrain from battle. Approximately 13,000 of them were slaughtered in the temple where they took refuge. Judea was now dependent on Rome, and its new king, Hyrcanus II, was revered by Pompey and treated like a subject by the Romans.

    Pompey thought about going home to Italy to revel in his victory. While returning, he followed in Alexander’s footsteps by establishing new towns as monuments to his greatness. After arriving at the city of Brindisi, he dispersed his forces to show the worried and admiring senate that he would not seize power via force. Pompey gambled on marriage ties as a means of gaining sway at the highest levels of politics. By allying himself closely with the more traditionalist Optimates, Pompey hoped to emerge as their new champion. As a result, he set his sights on tying the knot with a member of the Cato family. But the seasoned Stoic refused to give Pompey his niece in marriage.

    Julius Caesar 1

    Pompey finally realized what was going on here. His frequent victories and his will to succeed were worrying his would-be friends. He had already towered above many others and appeared menacing. Thus, he decided to look for a man who would understand him better. Similarly, Caesar also made his subjects fear him with reverence and respect. The two men agreed that it was time to join forces against the rest of Rome. In 59 BC, Pompey married his new friend Caesar’s daughter, Julia, to solidify his alliance.

    In their agreement to aid each other’s rise to power, Caesar and Pompey invited Crassus to this secret pact. The First Triumvirate planned to get Pompey and Crassus elected consuls and then vote to give Caesar more time in Gaul. Everything went according to plan. However, the pact was altered following Julia’s death in 54 BC and Crassus’ death in 53 BC in the East, two years after his consulship.

    Caesar vs. Pompey: a showdown between giants

    As early as 51 BC, Caesar ruled all of Gaul. Getting back to Rome and taking up a new consular position was high on Caesar’s list of priorities. The two men were destined to clash, at least in Pompey’s opinion. As a strategic move, Caesar suggested that his army be disbanded if Pompey would do the same. That was the equivalent of signing a symbolic nonaggression pact. But Pompey refused and instead called Caesar, who had recently defeated the chieftain of Gaul, Vercingetorix, to return to Rome after dismissing his men.

    But Caesar led his soldiers to cross the Rubicon River on January 12, 49 BC. The warning was crystal clear: The time for a titanic clash was drawing near. If there was to be a conflict, Pompey knew it would be in the city of Rome, which would not end well for him. Caesar’s army, bolstered by their Gallic successes, marched toward Pompey, while Pompey’s forces were outnumbered. It was on March 19 that Pompey departed Rome for the East, where he intended to reorganize his forces and force Caesar to meet him on neutral ground.

    The two generals fought a sort of positional battle in the spring of 48 BC, near Dyrrachium in Albania. Because of supply shortages, their soldiers had to endure. But both knew that it would be risky to go on the offensive under the circumstances. Nonetheless, on July 10, both armies clashed in the Battle of Dyrrhachium which took place from April to late July and ended in a non-trivial defeat for Caesar’s army.

    Battle of Pharsalus 48 BC
    The Battle of Pharsalus, 48 BC.

    But on August 9, 48 BC, near Pharsalus in central Greece, the two armies met again at the Battle of Pharsalus. Pompey lost 6,000 troops and another 24,000 captured, while Caesar only lost 1,200 men. Pompey admitted that this overwhelming defeat was the worst of his life. He escaped the camp and his soldiers while disguised as a regular civilian.

    On August 9th, at Pharsalia, Pompey stated he had just faced the worst defeat of his career. 6,000 of his soldiers lay dead, while another 24,000 were captive. As for Caesar, he had only lost 1,200.

    Pompey approached Ptolemy XIII, Cleopatra’s brother-husband, in a mad attempt to get revenge. He believed that hiding out in Egypt would buy him enough time to face his father-in-law, Caesar, again. On September 28th, his ship anchored off the coast of Pelusium, in the northern Nile Delta. A small group including the young pharaoh’s advisors greeted Pompey when he arrived aboard a boat. One of Pompey’s former centurions, the Roman Lucius Septimius, had been stationed in the Nile Valley for some time. While Pompey was caught off guard and trapped in the boat with no way to escape, the former legionary dealt the killing blow. Ptolemy XIII’s advisors, Pothinus and Achillas, had joined him in the assassination of Pompey as they watched Pompey die helplessly on the ship.

    death of pompey
    Pompey was assassinated and his body was dismembered to be delivered to Julius Caesar. (18th century, Gaetano Gandolfi oil painting, Musee Magnin)

    Pompey had a fantastic career and deserved more than such a death. His body was cast onto the shore, pouring boiling blood, and his head was severed by Achillas. Ptolemy XIII believed he held a priceless treasure in his hands: the head of one of Rome’s best tacticians. The killers fancied themselves more cunning than Pompey and hoped that by pleasing Caesar, they might secure his support. But rather than causing an ensuing peace, the death of Pompey sparked a civil war. Caesar still had the utmost respect for Pompey. He admired Pompey’s drive and professionalism in the military. He had, no doubt, enjoyed the confrontation and was honored to see such a skilled tactician struggling. Caesar and Pompey were mirror images of one another, and thus, Pompey went down in history as Caesar’s only truly legitimate competitor.

    Key dates in the history of Pompey


    60 BC: The First Triumvirate

    In order to become Consul of Rome, Julius Caesar created a covert alliance with Pompey and Crassus, which they called the First Triumvirate.

    59 BC: Caesar, Consul of Rome

    A triumvirate consisting of Pompey and Crassus and Julius Caesar allowed the latter to assume the position of Consul.

    149 BC: Julius Caesar crosses the Rubicon

    In order to unite Cisalpine Gaul and Italy, Julius Caesar led the 13th Legion over the Rubicon River. However, without permission from the Roman Senate, no military commander could cross this frontier.

    Julius Caesar broke Roman law and declared war on the Senate by disregarding this edict. While crossing the Rubicon, he yelled “Alea iacta est,” which means “The die is cast,” in popular Latin. Nothing could stop Julius Caesar from entering Rome, removing Pompey, and eventually becoming dictator for life over the whole Roman Empire.

    August 9, 48 BC: Pompey defeated by Caesar

    At Pharsalia in Thessaly, Caesar pursued and decimated Pompey’s forces. Following Caesar’s crossing of the Rubicon (the river dividing Gaul from Italy), Pompey and the Senators fled Rome and headed for Greece a year earlier. After Caesar’s defeat of Pompey, the latter sought asylum in Egypt with Ptolemy XIII, but Ptolemy XIII had him murdered because he was afraid of retaliation from Caesar.

    September 30, 48 BC: Assassination of Pompey

    Ptolemy XIII, Cleopatra’s husband, had the Roman commander Pompey, Caesar’s adversary, killed. The Egyptian pharaoh planned this assassination in an attempt to win Caesar’s favor. But it was unlikely that the Roman Emperor would appreciate this favor. In the end, Caesar had the pharaoh deposed so that Cleopatra could rise to the throne, and then he became her lover.

    47 BC: Julius Caesar meets Cleopatra

    As Caesar tracked down Pompey in Egypt, Julius Caesar found out that he had been murdered. He became resentful of Ptolemy XIII, the pharaoh, who was at odds with his sister-wife Cleopatra. The Egyptian Queen had an instant and profound effect on the Roman commander. Following his successful military campaign against the monarch, Caesar handed over Egypt’s throne to Cleopatra. They were now expecting a boy.

    March 15, 44 BC: Assassination of Julius Caesar

    Despite being named dictator for life, Julius Caesar was killed. 50 Senators, all of whom supported the reinstatement of the oligarchic republic, piled on top of Caesar during a session of the Senate and delivered 23 sword blows. Caesar died next to a monument honoring his opponent, Pompey. Caesar had a lot of respect for Brutus, the son of his mistress, and he had a lot of respect for Cassius, a Roman commander, who were both involved in the assassination.


    Bibliography