Author: Jim Collins

  • What Is Hawking Radiation?

    What Is Hawking Radiation?

    Hawking radiation describes the black body radiation that black holes emit through hypothetical particles formed near and at the event horizon. It’s a type of radiation that, on average, reduces the mass of black holes, making it an extraordinary property of black holes.

    buy cymbalta online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/cymbalta.html no prescription pharmacy

    Hawking radiation indicates that the temperature of black holes is inversely proportional to their mass. In other words, the smaller a black hole is, the more radiation it will emit, the hotter it will glow, and the faster it will evaporate.

    Despite never having been directly observed and being very difficult to detect, Hawking radiation is a prediction supported by unified models of General Relativity and quantum mechanics. This radiation is called “Hawking Radiation” because in 1974, the great physicist Stephen Hawking was the first to question whether such radiation could exist in his paper titled “Black hole explosions?“.

    Stephen Hawking was asking a fundamental question: Nothing, not even light, can escape from black holes; but could black holes emit heat? The answer to this question is enormously important because if Hawking radiation is proven to be real, our knowledge about the nature and lifespan of black holes will fundamentally change: If black holes do radiate, contrary to what was previously thought, it means they shrink over time. As these already extremely dense objects become even smaller through this radiation, the smallest black holes would violently explode with the slightest heat contact, while larger ones would slowly evaporate and disappear over trillions of years.

    Why Should Black Holes Radiate?

    When matter enters a black hole, it becomes completely isolated from the rest of the Universe. Before Hawking, scientists thought that objects falling into a black hole could never escape, making black holes a one-way street. According to them, black holes didn’t emit any matter, energy, or information. However, this meant the disappearance of entropy, the measure of disorder that physicists refer to.

    buy kamagra gold online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/kamagra-gold.html no prescription pharmacy

    The ability of matter to vanish inside black holes would make the Universe less disordered (or more ordered), suggesting that this property of black holes violated the second law of thermodynamics.

    Hawking disagreed with this view. According to Hawking, black holes obeyed the second law of thermodynamics, and their entropy had to increase over time. This was a critical acceptance because anything with entropy must have a temperature! In other words, entropy is just another way of describing heat energy that always emits radiation. If the event horizon had entropy, it would have to glow somehow. This meant black holes couldn’t be as black as they appeared.

    However, Hawking wasn’t the only physicist trying to solve the black hole problem.

    buy diflucan online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/diflucan.html no prescription pharmacy

    Jacob Bekenstein, then a physics student at Princeton University, showed that when matter falls into a black hole, the surface area of the event horizon—the region most affected by the black hole’s incredible gravity—should increase slightly. He demonstrated that this change in surface area was equivalent to the entropy that would otherwise be lost, a proposal that could solve the paradox.

    Nevertheless, Hawking wasn’t entirely convinced by this explanation either. Therefore, he tried to determine the temperature of black holes through his calculations. To do this, he combined the predictions of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, which explains how gravity works on large scales, with quantum mechanics, which describes how the Universe works at the smallest scale. These two theories have still not been fully unified today, and one of physicists’ greatest dreams is to reach a Theory of Everything that can explain the Universe from the smallest to the largest scale in one go. Hawking had to use both theories because both help us explain how things work at the event horizon of black holes.

    In his efforts to disprove Bekenstein’s seemingly absurd proposal, Hawking discussed this topic with other physicists and tried to use mathematical models to show it was impossible. However, far from disproving Bekenstein, Hawking found that black holes indeed glow with a kind of “cold light.” He communicated this to the masses with these immortal words:

    The message of this lecture is that black holes ain’t as black as they are painted. They are not the eternal prisons they were once thought. Things can get out of a black hole both on the outside and possibly to another universe. So if you feel you are in a black hole, don’t give up – there’s a way out

    How Do Black Holes Produce Hawking Radiation?

    The physical process behind particles emanating from the event horizon around a black hole is quite complex and requires a solid understanding of the mathematical foundation of quantum field theory.

    But if we try to explain it simply, you first need to understand this: The vacuum of space is, in many ways, not empty at all! Of course, you can imagine removing all matter, all radiation, all energy quanta from a region of space, until what remains is close to “nothing” that we can remove from this Universe.

    However, even in this case, the “zero-point energy” of that empty space—the lowest energy level a quantum mechanics-based system can have—is not zero. Even if you remove everything you can, space itself has an inherent amount of energy that is non-zero.

    How Do Black Holes Produce Hawking Radiation?

    One way to conceptually understand and better visualize this is through particle-antiparticle pairs. Note: These virtual particles are not real particles; they’re just a conceptual way to imagine the non-zero vacuum energy. However, according to quantum mechanics, particles and antiparticles are said to constantly come into and out of existence. We’ll emphasize this point again shortly.

    Normally, when these virtual particle pairs begin to exist, they cannot maintain their existence for long, and the pair quickly annihilates each other. In fact, shortly after the Big Bang, more matter than antimatter was produced for an unknown reason, allowing things to exist in the Universe. Without this imbalance, the Universe would have quickly annihilated itself.

    At the boundary of black holes, things don’t work as they normally do.

    Around a black hole, there are three regions where these particle-antiparticle pairs can emerge:

    1. A region where both particles in the pair appear outside the black hole’s event horizon, exist, and re-annihilate each other.
    2. A region where both particles in the pair appear inside the black hole’s event horizon, exist, and re-annihilate each other.
    3. A region where both particles in the pair appear outside the black hole’s event horizon, but one falls into the black hole while the other escapes.

    Yes, this is an extremely simplified explanation. However, although this description doesn’t fully define where Hawking radiation comes from or what its energy spectrum is, it’s one of the simplest visualizations that correctly explains the qualitative properties.

    In his quite popular book, Hawking explains his theory as virtual particles affected by extreme gravity, where one particle of the pair escapes from the black hole, causing mass loss due to the strong gravitational effects that give negative energy to the other particle.

    The one falling into the black hole is said to effectively have negative energy. The one escaping from the black hole has positive energy. The particle that manages to escape from the black hole is what causes what we call Hawking Radiation. Since the energy of the particle pair falling into the black hole is effectively negative, it means energy is escaping from the black hole somewhere; in other words, the energy (and therefore mass) of the black hole is gradually decreasing.

    Again: The important thing to remember at this point is that these “pairs” we’re talking about aren’t physically real. In reality, what comes out of the black hole is a black body radiation spectrum. This spectrum is related to the size of the black hole’s event horizon. Also, the scattered spectrum is mostly in the form of extremely low-energy photons, and smaller black holes radiate faster. Therefore, as a black hole evaporates and shrinks, it evaporates increasingly faster.

    The significance of this is: A particle pair that emerges inside the black hole cannot add mass to the black hole because the total energy there is always the same. Ultimately, the energy of particle-antiparticle pairs comes from the space around them. However, if you have energy resulting in real radiation moving away from the black hole originating from outside space, this energy must come from the black hole itself and reduce its mass. This is how Hawking radiation works, and this is why black holes gradually evaporate.

    In summary, Hawking Radiation occurs when one of a particle-antiparticle pair—which normally come into existence from nothing and return to nothing within the fabric of spacetime—falls into the black hole while the other escapes from the black hole. Because these particles are separated by an enormous gravitational difference, they cannot annihilate each other, thus affecting the mass of the black hole.

    How Does Black Hole Evaporation Happen?

    As we’ve mentioned, if black holes radiate energy back to the rest of the Universe, their eventual “evaporation” and disappearance becomes inevitable. It’s possible to detect this spectrum emitted from the black hole by examining the black hole’s thermal equilibrium state and the extreme redshift events that occur very close to the event horizon (where quantum entanglement phenomena must also be taken into account).

    Virtual particles that form under quantum effects very close to a black hole almost always exist as a pair of photons. One of these photons cannot pass the event horizon and becomes trapped inside the black hole; the other escapes from the black hole and travels toward the rest of the Universe.

    Looking at this process more closely, here’s what we see: An extreme redshift event occurs in the photon formed at the black hole’s event horizon. Meanwhile, the photon escaping from the black hole almost “shatters.” Interestingly, the intensity of this escaping photon increases slightly. This intensity increase causes the formation of a particle called a partner wave that carries negative energy, which gets caught in the black hole’s strong gravity and falls into the black hole.

    The photon escaping from the black hole adds positive energy to the rest of the Universe; however, note that no matter has actually left from inside the black hole. On the other hand, the partner wave falling into the black hole is subject to conservation laws and therefore undergoes the same black body radiation as the escaping photon. Therefore, the radiation of this wave carries no information about the internal conditions of the black hole.

    The mass and rotational energy of black holes that emit Hawking Radiation decrease over time, and they eventually disappear through a process called black hole evaporation. Therefore, black holes that don’t receive mass from external sources must eventually cease to exist. For all black holes except very small ones, this evaporation process occurs incredibly slowly.

  • Time Moves Faster On Moon Than On Earth?

    Time Moves Faster On Moon Than On Earth?

    In April 2024, the White House launched a challenge to scientists: establish a lunar time standard in view of a growing international presence on the Moon and potential human bases as part of NASA’s Artemis initiative. However, the real question is not simply “What time is it?”, but rather “How quickly does time pass?”.

    The time displayed on a clock can be set by any timekeeper, but physics determines how quickly time flows.

    buy flexeril online https://b-nutritious.com/support/php/flexeril.html no prescription pharmacy

    In the early 20th century, Albert Einstein demonstrated that two observers would not agree on the duration of an hour if they were not moving at the same speed and in the same direction. This disagreement is also present between a person on Earth and one on the Moon.

    Relativity Effects on the Moon

    “If we were on the Moon, clocks would tick differently compared to those on Earth,” explained Bijunath Patla, theoretical physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in Boulder, Colorado. The Moon’s movement relative to Earth causes lunar clocks to slow down compared to terrestrial ones, but the lesser lunar gravity accelerates them. “These two opposing effects result in a net drift of 56 microseconds per day“, said Patla.

    Patla and his colleague Neil Ashby used Einstein’s general relativity theory to calculate this difference, improving previous analyses. Their results were published in the Astronomical Journal.

    Implications for Lunar Missions

    Although a difference of 56 microseconds may seem negligible by human standards, it is crucial for missions requiring millimeter precision or communications between Earth and the Moon. “The safety of navigation in a future lunar ecosystem depends on precise clock synchronization“, stated Cheryl Gramling, system engineer at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center. A 56-microsecond error per day could cause navigation inaccuracies up to 17 kilometers per day, an unacceptable problem for Artemis missions, which will require knowing the exact position of every rover, lander, and astronaut within a 10-meter margin.

    buy aurogra online https://b-nutritious.com/support/php/aurogra.html no prescription pharmacy

    The Lunar Time Challenge

    A fundamental principle of relativity theory is that there is no absolute time. A clock on the Earth’s surface ticks more slowly than one in orbit due to gravitational effects, which is why GPS satellites must account for relativity. Establishing time on the Moon is further complicated by its orbit around Earth and Earth’s rotation, which influence time perception.

    buy fildena online https://b-nutritious.com/support/php/fildena.html no prescription pharmacy

    Ashby and Patla recognized that the Earth-Moon system is in free fall under solar gravity’s influence, allowing them to consider complex contributions such as celestial body rotation, tidal forces, and deviations from perfect spheres. They also calculated gravitationally stable positions between Earth and the Moon, known as Lagrange points, useful for communication relay satellites.

    Towards a Standard Lunar Time Future

    Other scientists, such as Sergei Kopeikin from the University of Missouri and George Kaplan from the US Naval Observatory, have also calculated a 56-microsecond time shift between Earth and the Moon. They also considered small periodic fluctuations due to variations in tidal force caused by the Sun and Jupiter.

    The scientific community has done a great service by publishing this work,” said Gramling. “Now we can propose a standardized model for lunar time to the entire international timekeeping community.”

    Although it will take many years or decades before the Moon hosts enough humans and robots to necessitate precise timekeeping, scientists and engineers recognize the importance of establishing a standard much earlier than expected. They have already taken the first, difficult step towards determining time on the Moon.

  • Is There Really No Sound In Space?

    Is There Really No Sound In Space?

    Light is what we call an “electromagnetic wave.” It can propagate even in a vacuum. Sound, on the other hand, is a mechanical wave.

    buy cialis super active online http://rheumconsultants.com/forms/pdf/cialis-super-active.html no prescription pharmacy

    Much like a wave on the surface of water, it propagates from point to point.

    Sound Waves and Noise in Space

    A sound wave needs matter to propagate, through a succession of compressions and expansions in the medium in which it is produced. This medium can be solid, liquid, or gaseous.

    buy cialis professional online http://rheumconsultants.com/forms/pdf/cialis-professional.html no prescription pharmacy

    Propagation, Sound Speed, and Material Density

    In interstellar space, the density of matter is far too low — on the order of one particle per cubic centimeter, compared to around 10²⁰ particles per cubic centimeter on Earth — for sound to have any medium to travel through. This is why no sound can be heard in space.

    buy celexa online http://rheumconsultants.com/forms/pdf/celexa.html no prescription pharmacy

    Blaise Pascal aptly spoke of the “eternal silence of infinite spaces.”

    It is also worth noting that the denser a body, the faster sound can propagate through it. For example, in air, the speed of sound is about 340 meters per second (m/s), in water, it rises to around 1,500 m/s, and in iron, it reaches 5 kilometers per second!

  • What Will Happen to Your Body on Different Objects in the Solar System

    What Will Happen to Your Body on Different Objects in the Solar System

    Elon Musk has indeed sent the first astronauts to the ISS and is soon threatening to conquer Mars with the Starship, which is currently under construction. It is quite possible that the first flight to the Red Planet will happen within the next few years.

    However, colonizing other celestial bodies, as Elon dreams, will not be easy since conditions on them are, to put it mildly, not very comfortable. Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson spoke in detail about how long a person could survive on various planets or even stars in an interview with Business Insider.

    Sun

    sun
    Image: NASA/ESA, SOHO

    Obviously, the Sun would incinerate you instantly, as its surface temperature is 5,499°C (9930°F). Technically, the Sun doesn’t have a solid surface—this term refers to the area between its core and its corona. You would simply evaporate without a trace.

    However, “instantly” is a relative term. Physicist Randall Munroe, a former NASA employee, believes that if you were teleported to the Sun for just one nanosecond (one-billionth of a second) and then returned, you would survive. Your skin would receive about five orders of magnitude less heat than a one-second touch of a butane burner, meaning you wouldn’t even notice.

    But if you were teleported closer to the core, where temperatures reach 14,999,727°C (26,999,540°F), you would evaporate in one femtosecond (one millionth of a nanosecond, or one quadrillionth of a second).

    Average lifespan: 10⁻¹⁵ seconds.

    Mercury

    Colors of the Innermost Planet, Mercury
    Image: NASA

    A day on Mercury lasts 59 Earth days, and its year lasts 88 Earth days. The planet has virtually no atmosphere, so the sky is always black, and the Sun appears two and a half times larger than it does from Earth. It also moves strangely across the sky. The daytime side of Mercury heats up to +427°C (806°F), while the night side cools down to −180°C (-292°F).

    However, if you were to stand somewhere on the border between day and night (the so-called terminator), you could survive—as long as you could do without oxygen.

    The surface of Mercury is almost a vacuum, so if there is still air in your lungs, they would likely burst, your body would start to swell, and your blood would begin to boil. In about 10-15 seconds, you would lose consciousness due to lack of oxygen, and after 1-2 minutes, you would die from simple hypoxia.

    Average lifespan: 2 minutes.

    Venus

    venus planet
    Image: NASA

    Venus has almost the same gravity as Earth, but its atmosphere is much denser, composed mostly of carbon dioxide. The air is so thick that it would be difficult to move—like being 914 meters (3,000 feet) underwater in the Pacific Ocean. A day on Venus lasts 116 Earth days, but the atmosphere is so thick that it’s very dark on the surface.

    The greenhouse effect heats the planet up to 465°C (869°F), causing constant sulfuric acid rain, which turns into sulfuric acid fog near the surface.

    Thus, if you were to land on Venus, you would immediately be crushed by the atmosphere and burned by the heat and sulfuric acid.

    Average lifespan: less than 1 second.

    Earth

    earth
    Image: NASA

    Mostly harmless.

    Lifespan: from several seconds or minutes (if you find yourself near aggressive predators, hostile humans, over the ocean, inside a volcano crater, or at high altitudes with thin air) to 122 years (the official longevity record set by Frenchwoman Jeanne Calment).

    Mars

    mars nasa
    Image: NASA

    Mars is quite cold, ranging from −60 to +20°C, but it also has a very thin atmosphere composed mainly of carbon dioxide, with some nitrogen and argon. The low temperatures will not feel as extreme as they would on Earth. However, there’s nothing to breathe.

    You would survive on Mars as long as you could hold your breath. If you brought an oxygen tank, you’d then be killed by the low atmospheric pressure (within a few minutes), the cold (in a few hours), Martian dust damaging your lungs (within a few weeks), or radiation (within a few months).

    Average lifespan: 2 minutes.

    Jupiter

    jupiter aurora
    Image: NASA

    Jupiter is a gas giant, meaning it has no solid surface to land on. If you were to fall into it from a great height, you would likely be killed by intense radiation long before reaching the atmosphere.

    If you somehow survived this and reached the upper layers of the atmosphere, you would plummet through them at 180,000 km/h (due to Jupiter’s stronger gravity, you would fall faster). At around 250 kilometers in altitude, you would encounter ammonia clouds and experience temperatures of −150°C and strong winds—hurricanes in Jupiter’s hydrogen atmosphere reach speeds of 482 km/h. At this point, the pressure would already be enough to kill you.

    If you managed to survive this, after 12 hours of continuous falling, you would reach the lower layers of the atmosphere, where total darkness reigns, the pressure is 2,000,000 times greater than on Earth, and temperatures are higher than on the surface of the Sun. Nothing could save you there.

    Average lifespan: less than 1 second.

    Saturn

    saturn nasa
    Image: NASA

    Everything said about Jupiter also applies to the other gas giants. Saturn is no exception—if you fell into its atmosphere, you would be crushed by enormous pressure and destroyed by high temperatures.

    Average lifespan: less than 1 second.

    Uranus

    uranus
    Image: NASA

    Another gas giant. Pressure, temperature, and radiation are guaranteed.

    Average lifespan: less than 1 second.

    Neptune

    neptune
    Image: NASA

    Although Neptune is called an ice giant, deep within its hydrogen-methane atmosphere, temperatures reach 476.85°C (890°F). The pressure is also extremely high. So, on this planet, the same fate awaits you as on Jupiter.

    Average lifespan: less than 1 second.

  • Why Can You See the Moon During the Day?

    Why Can You See the Moon During the Day?

    The moon is often called the night luminary because it is associated with the dark hours of the day. However, you’ve probably seen it during the day too!


    Have you ever wondered why this is possible?

    Generally, people with limited knowledge of our planetary system think that the Moon and the Sun oppose each other in the sky. They believe that during the day, the Sun is visible but not the Moon, and at night, the Moon is visible but not the Sun. However, this is yet another myth.

    In reality, the Moon is directly opposite the Sun only once a month—during a full moon. At this time, you won’t see it in the daytime sky. Additionally, during a new moon, it’s also impossible to spot because the Moon is too close to the Sun and facing us with its unlit side. However, during other phases, you can see it.

    The window for observing the Moon in daylight is about six hours a day, 25 days a month. It is best seen during the first and last quarters.

    If Earth didn’t have an atmosphere, the Moon could be observed for 12 hours every day continuously. However, particles of nitrogen and oxygen in the air scatter sunlight with short wavelengths, such as blue and violet. This gives the sky its blue color and complicates the observation of celestial bodies.

    buy hydroxychloroquine online https://fasteruc.com/occupational-health-services/html/hydroxychloroquine.html no prescription pharmacy

    Wherever we look, we see scattered sunlight in the atmosphere—it literally overshadows the radiation from other objects. This is why we can’t see stars and other planets during the day.

    The Moon is an exception because it is very close to us, and the sunlight it reflects is bright enough to overcome even the lit daytime atmosphere. Therefore, it can be seen with the naked eye, though it will appear much paler than at night.

    buy tetracycline online https://fasteruc.com/occupational-health-services/html/tetracycline.html no prescription pharmacy

  • 5 Facts About Gravity

    5 Facts About Gravity

    Earth’s Gravity is Weaker than Your Fridge Magnet

    There are four so-called fundamental forces in the universe: the strong nuclear force, which ensures the stability of atomic nuclei; the weak nuclear force, responsible for radioactive decay; the electromagnetic force; and our beloved gravity. The latter is what holds Earth, other planets, stars, solar systems, and galaxies from falling apart.

    However, gravity is the weakest of all the fundamental forces. And scientists still don’t fully understand why.

    You might say, but gravity drives the movement of stars, galaxies, and other massive objects—how can it be weak? Well, put a magnet on your fridge. Now ask yourself why a tiny fridge magnet attracts more strongly than the entire planet.

    And the weak and strong nuclear forces are even more powerful than electromagnetic forces. At least you can remove a magnet from the fridge with your bare hands, but splitting atoms with your hands is beyond human capability. For comparison, the electric force between an electron and a proton within an atom is approximately one quintillion (that’s a one followed by 30 zeros) times stronger than the gravitational attraction between them.

    This is one of the major mysteries in physics. Scientists theorize that the universe might have additional dimensions hidden from our perception. Gravity could be spreading across all of these, while electromagnetic, strong, and weak nuclear forces remain confined to our four-dimensional space-time.

    It’s even possible that our gravity affects objects in other universes, if they exist. In turn, their gravitational pull might influence our objects.

    buy doxycycline online https://www.svmassagetherapy.com/docs/pdf/doxycycline.html no prescription pharmacy

    This could explain why our universe is expanding faster than expected. At least, that’s a theory proposed by physicists who don’t favor the concept of dark matter and energy.
    buy antabuse online https://www.svmassagetherapy.com/docs/pdf/antabuse.html no prescription pharmacy

    Despite these theories, there is currently no experimental evidence to confirm or refute them.

    Gravity Creates Waves

    Imagine space-time as a stretched fabric, or the surface of a pond if you prefer. When massive objects like black holes move or neutron stars merge, they create distortions in space-time—similar to folds in fabric or waves rippling out when a stone falls into a pond. That’s more or less what gravitational waves look like.

    These analogies are somewhat strained because both fabric and the pond surface are flat, while the universe is three-dimensional. Still, scientists haven’t come up with better examples.

    Gravitational waves are different from sound or light waves, so we cannot hear or see them. However, using special instruments called laser interferometers, scientists can detect them. This allows researchers to study distant massive objects and cosmic events happening in the farthest corners of the universe.

    Albert Einstein predicted the existence of gravitational waves a century ago.

    But only recently has humanity developed tools to detect them. One such instrument is the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). In 2015, it recorded gravitational waves for the first time, coming from the merger of two black holes about 1.3 billion light-years from Earth.

    These waves pass through all obstacles, including empty space, and are not absorbed or reflected. They also travel across the universe at the speed of light.

    Earth’s Gravity is Not Uniform

    You’ve probably seen this animation. There’s a myth online claiming this is what Earth looks like without its oceans.

    buy singulair online https://www.svmassagetherapy.com/docs/pdf/singulair.html no prescription pharmacy

    But in reality, this model shows Earth’s gravitational field, not the planet itself.

    You see, gravity is stronger where there is more mass. And Earth’s gravitational field is uneven for several reasons. First, our planet is not a perfect sphere. It’s slightly flattened at the poles and bulging at the equator, leading to an uneven distribution of mass.

    Second, Earth’s surface is quite irregular. We have tall mountains, deep ocean trenches, and other landforms with varying masses. Third, the materials within the planet are also unevenly distributed. All these factors result in gravity varying from place to place on Earth.

    This means that in different locations on our planet, you will weigh differently.

    For example, if you’re in Colombo, Sri Lanka, your weight will be slightly less than if you were in Kathmandu, Nepal.

    buy hydroxychloroquine online https://medilaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/hydroxychloroquine.html no prescription pharmacy

    The Indian Ocean is one of the regions with the lowest relative gravity in the world, whereas the heavy Himalayas increase it.

    Another example: for a long time, scientists couldn’t understand why gravity in the region around Hudson Bay in Canada is weaker than it theoretically should be. It turned out that ancient glaciers there are melting, reducing their mass and therefore the gravitational force.

    So, if you’re not happy with the number on your scale, just move to a different location, and you might lose a kilogram or two right away. Of course, your mass will remain the same, but your weight will decrease. Physics.

    Gravity Bends Light

    Einstein Cross
    Einstein cross: Four images of the same distant quasar. Image: NASA, ESA, and STScI

    It’s easy to observe how gravity affects physical objects. Thanks to it, we stand firmly on Earth instead of floating off into space, apples fall downward, the sun revolves around the center of the galaxy, and so on.

    However, this force influences not only matter but also light. This is why black holes are called such: their gravitational pull is so powerful that all the light they attract cannot escape their gravitational field.

    But sometimes photons don’t fall into the massive object; they simply pass by, slightly changing their trajectory.

    This phenomenon is known as gravitational lensing. It occurs because gravity distorts space and time around massive objects like stars and galaxies.

    buy bactrim online https://medilaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/bactrim.html no prescription pharmacy

    As a result, light passing by these massive objects follows a curved path instead of a straight line.

    Gravitational lensing was first predicted by Albert Einstein in his general theory of relativity. He hypothesized that light from a distant object would bend as it passed by a massive star closer to us. His theory was experimentally confirmed during the solar eclipse of 1919.

    Gravitational lensing can create impressive effects, such as “Einstein rings” or “Einstein cross,” when light from a distant galaxy bends around a closer one, forming rings, arcs, and other light shapes.

    This phenomenon is also used by astronomers to study dark matter. Since dark matter doesn’t emit light, it cannot be directly observed. However, we can detect its presence through the effects of gravitational lensing.

    Weightlessness is Not the Absence of Gravity

    If you ask a random person why astronauts float in the air on the ISS, they would most likely say it’s because there’s no gravity in space. This, of course, is incorrect; otherwise, how could the Sun keep planets in orbit?

    Here’s why that statement is wrong. Imagine you are on a plane, and it suddenly starts to dive. If you throw a ball into the air at that moment, it will obviously fall. However, since the plane is also descending, it will seem to you as though the ball is floating in the air. This is the state of weightlessness. Incidentally, astronauts practice for space flights in diving planes to adapt to this.

    NASA staff humorously call these training planes “Vomit Comet.” You can guess why.

    The same thing happens to astronauts in orbit. A spacecraft or station is constantly being pulled toward Earth due to gravity. But since they are moving forward fast enough, they never fall but instead continue circling the planet on every orbit. This creates the illusion of zero gravity, although it is more accurate to call this state “microgravity.”

    In reality, all of space is permeated by gravity, and there is no place in the universe where it doesn’t exist. Scientists believe that although its speed of propagation is limited by the speed of light, and its strength diminishes quickly with distance from the source, its range is infinite.

    So right now, you’re being affected by gravitational waves from some black hole that takes tens of thousands of years to reach Earth. It’s just that their strength is minuscule compared to Earth’s gravity. And that’s a good thing, you know.

  • Why Doesn’t The Moon Fall Into The Earth?

    Why Doesn’t The Moon Fall Into The Earth?

    You’ve likely seen the movie Moonfall, read science fiction disaster novels, or simply gazed at the night sky, pondering eternity. Have you ever wondered: Why doesn’t the Moon fall to Earth? Let’s explore this together.

    The theory of gravity, formulated by Isaac Newton in the 17th century, describes the orbit of celestial bodies, including the Moon’s movement around the Earth. According to this theory, the gravitational force between two objects is proportional to their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

    In other words, Earth pulls the Moon with its gravitational force, and the Moon does the same. This interaction is due to the masses of both objects and the distance between them.

    If the Moon were hanging motionless in a vacuum, Earth’s gravity would pull it much more strongly, and the satellite would fall onto our planet—a rather unfortunate outcome.

    But luckily, the Moon moves around the Earth and at a significant speed—1.023 km/s. This speed provides the necessary inertia, which is an object’s tendency to maintain its state of motion unless acted upon by other forces.


    Thanks to this inertia, the moon stays in its orbit.

    If the Moon were moving more slowly, Earth’s gravity would overpower its motion, and it would fall onto the Earth. On the other hand, if the Moon were moving faster, it would break free from its orbit and fly off into space.


    Where does the Moon get such inertia, allowing it to orbit Earth for billions of years? To answer this, we need to recall how our satellite was formed.

    According to modern understanding (the giant impact hypothesis), the Moon was formed when a large object, roughly the size of Mars, collided with Earth about 4.5 billion years ago. As a result, Earth and the colliding celestial body (a planet named Theia) merged into the planet we live on today.

    The impact was so intense that the ejected debris didn’t fall back to Earth but instead gathered in orbit, eventually forming the Moon. You can watch an animation prepared by NASA to better understand what this looked like. In reality, scientists believe the process took only a few hours.

    Fortunately, there was no life on Earth at the time (life had not yet emerged), so these cosmic-scale events occurred without us. We now witness only the result of this collision—the moon.

    According to the law of conservation of momentum, if no external forces act on an object, its momentum (the product of its mass and velocity) remains constant. Since space has little resistance or friction, the Moon continues to move by inertia, orbiting the Earth.

    In fact, the Moon isn’t falling toward Earth; rather, it’s gradually drifting away into space. Earth’s strong gravitational pull slows the Moon’s rotation on its axis, a phenomenon called tidal interaction. Because of this, the Moon is moving away from Earth at a rate of about 3.8 cm per year. In billions of years, our satellite will likely drift off completely, but by that time, Earth will be uninhabitable due to the increasing heat from the sun.

    So, don’t worry—the moon definitely won’t fall on us.

  • What if the Sun Became a Black Hole?

    What if the Sun Became a Black Hole?

    It is hard to argue that the sun is incredibly beneficial. It gives us light and warmth, keeps water in a liquid state, and helps plants photosynthesize. It would be extremely sad if something happened to our star—for example, if it turned into a black hole.

    Strictly speaking, in reality, the sun cannot become a black hole because it is not heavy enough. For example, the mass of the smallest known black holes is between 3.66 and 4.97 times the mass of our star. Theoretically, smaller black holes could exist, weighing just about 2.7 times the mass of the Sun. However, astronomers have yet to observe them through their radio telescopes.

    In other words, the sun would need to be at least 2.7 times heavier to turn into a black hole. And even then, it’s not guaranteed that it would succeed.

    However, not only have we imagined the Sun turning into a black hole, but we have also lost it altogether, flown through Jupiter, and experimented on the Moon—so why not try new experiments?

    So, let’s imagine the star suddenly turns into a black hole of equivalent mass—how would this affect our lives?

    buy tetracycline online https://blobuyinfo.com/buy-tetracycline.html no prescription pharmacy

    Well, for the first 8 minutes, or more precisely, 499 seconds, we wouldn’t notice anything because light takes time to reach Earth. After that, the sun would simply disappear, and eternal night would fall—only distant stars would illuminate the sky. They would be visible 24 hours a day, which, you have to admit, would significantly simplify astronomical observations.

    buy nolvadex online https://blobuyinfo.com/buy-nolvadex.html no prescription pharmacy

    Perhaps you imagine a beautiful, massive black hole appearing in the sky, like Gargantua from Interstellar or Sagittarius A* at the center of our galaxy, which was photographed by astronomers from the European Southern Observatory in 2022.

    But no. Those are supermassive objects surrounded by large accretion disks of matter falling into them. A black hole formed from the sun would have a radius of only 3 kilometers. You wouldn’t even be able to see it through a telescope.

    Moreover, our new system’s black hole wouldn’t have any material to absorb and form an accretion disk—there are no nearby stars or nebulas to consume. As a result, the hole would be dark, unnoticeable, and lacking the beautiful orange special effects.

    But don’t worry; this transformation has many advantages.

    The Earth and all other planets would continue to orbit around our black hole just as they do now. Since its mass remains unchanged, the gravitational influence would stay the same.

    Black holes are stable and last for a very long time. In theory, they slowly lose mass and disappear—this is called Hawking radiation. But this process is slow, and we would no longer need to fear that in 3 billion years, the Sun will boil the oceans, or in 5 billion years, it will turn into a red giant and engulf the Earth.

    buy lipitor online https://blobuyinfo.com/buy-lipitor.html no prescription pharmacy

    Specialists from McGill University in Montreal calculated the evaporation time for a black hole with the mass of the Sun due to Hawking radiation—10⁶⁷ years. And as you can see, this is far longer than the current age of the universe.

    So, our new system would continue to revolve for an incredibly long time, and the planets wouldn’t collide with one another.

    However, there are some minor drawbacks to this scenario. Due to the lack of sunlight, civilization would need to move underground, closer to the core, build highly efficient nuclear reactors, and melt drinking water using artificial heating. This technological challenge would give an unprecedented boost to scientific development.

    Or we could all just freeze and die.

  • Why Does Time Only Move Forwards?

    Why Does Time Only Move Forwards?

    Sometimes, everything falls out of your hands in the morning: the egg lands on the floor instead of the pan, and spoiled milk accidentally ends up in your coffee. In such moments, the thought slips through your mind: “If only I could turn back time and fix this ruined breakfast.” But the arrow of time—as scientists call its unidirectionality—only points from the past to the future.

    Theoretically, if the flow of time went in the opposite direction—from the future to the past—the laws of physics, mechanics, the theory of relativity, quantum field theory, and all the other rules that describe our world would still work just as well.

    For the fundamental laws of nature, it makes no difference in which direction the clock’s arrow moves.

    The entire snag lies in a single rule that distinguishes the past from the future—the second law of thermodynamics. It states that in an isolated system, entropy either remains unchanged or increases. Still unclear? Let’s break it down.

    Entropy is the measure of disorder in a closed system. The more disorder there is, the higher it is. Imagine a new deck of cards, where the cards of each suit are grouped together and arranged in order, from six to ace. When you shuffle them, they end up in a random order. At this moment, the entropy of the deck increases. The same thing happens when you drop an egg on the floor or add milk to your coffee.

    So why doesn’t the egg gather itself back into the shell, and why doesn’t the coffee separate from the milk? Because in this case, entropy would decrease, which would violate the second law of thermodynamics, according to which it can only grow or stay unchanged.

    Of course, you can sort the cards in the deck again or clean up the broken egg. But to restore order, you need to exert effort. In the process of this action, you increase the entropy of the surrounding environment—and, as a result, the entropy of the entire universe. Thus, the second law always remains in effect.

    We know that the universe is constantly expanding, and its entropy is inexorably growing—as a result of these processes, it is becoming more chaotic and “diluted.”

    It’s logical to assume that everything began at a point in the past when the entropy of the universe was low. Scientists believe that this point was the Big Bang.

    13.8 billion years ago, our universe was infinitely dense and hot—this state is called a cosmological singularity. When the Big Bang occurred, entropy began to rise, and we still feel its effects to this day. No one knows for sure why the early universe ended up in such an orderly singularity and what happened before that. Nevertheless, cosmologists believe that the flow of time moving from the past to the future is a consequence of that initial state.

    buy periactin online https://infobuyblo.com/buy-periactin.html no prescription pharmacy

    It is likely that the arrow of time, like many things that have a beginning, will eventually have an end.

    buy tirzepatide online https://infobuyblo.com/buy-tirzepatide.html no prescription pharmacy

    One popular hypothesis suggests that the universe, along with time, will come to an end when a “heat death” occurs. This hypothesis was first proposed by physicist Rudolf Clausius in 1865. He extrapolated the second law of thermodynamics to the entire universe.
    buy rybelsus online https://infobuyblo.com/buy-rybelsus.html no prescription pharmacy

    One day, all the stars will burn out, and black holes will evaporate. The universe will expand to the point where only emptiness remains. At this moment, it will reach a state of equilibrium, close to maximum entropy.

    It is possible that by then, the direction of time will disappear. But until that moment, we must accept that reversing time is not an option.

  • NASA Discovers a Long-Sought Global Electric Field on Earth

    NASA Discovers a Long-Sought Global Electric Field on Earth

    The story begins in the late 1960s. When the first space probes flew over the poles of our Earth.

    buy cleocin online http://www.biop.cz/slimbox/css/png/cleocin.html no prescription pharmacy

    They detected a flux of particles escaping from our atmosphere.
    buy levitra soft online https://rxxbuynoprescriptiononline.net/buy-levitra-soft.html no prescription pharmacy

    A kind of polar wind directed towards space. And the phenomenon immediately caught the attention of scientists.
    buy kamagra oral jelly online https://rxxbuynoprescriptiononline.net/buy-kamagra-oral-jelly.html no prescription pharmacy

    Not that they were surprised that particles escape from our atmosphere — like steam from a pot of boiling water — but they were surprised to see cold particles shooting off at supersonic speeds.

    Physicists quickly suspected an electric field to be responsible for the phenomenon. They imagined it generated at about 250 kilometers altitude. In these regions, the atoms of our atmosphere indeed decompose into electrons and ions.

    buy semaglutide online http://www.biop.cz/slimbox/css/png/semaglutide.html no prescription pharmacy

    Given the mass differences between the two, one might expect them to move away from each other due to gravity.
    buy retin a online https://rxxbuynoprescriptiononline.net/buy-retin-a.html no prescription pharmacy

    But since electrons and ions carry opposite charges, they should generate an electric field that prevents their separation. An electric field that physicists call ambipolar because it allows ions to drag electrons towards the ground when they are subject to gravity and, conversely, electrons to lift ions towards the heights when they try to escape into space. As a consequence, there’s an increase in the height of our atmosphere and ions rise high enough to finally escape from it.

    A Suborbital Rocket to Reveal Earth’s Electric Field

    That’s the theory. In practice, scientists have long sought to detect such an electric field. Without success. Until today. And after several years of developing a new instrument. NASA researchers report in the journal Nature.

    They first identified “the only rocket range in the world where you can fly through the polar wind and make the measurements” they needed for this. This place is located in Svalbard. So in May 2022, scientists set course for this Norwegian archipelago just a few hundred kilometers from the North Pole. And after about fifteen minutes of suborbital flight, their rocket, named Endurance, indeed measured a variation in electric potential! Of only 0.55 volts. About what it takes to power a watch. But enough to explain the polar wind.

    A Weak Electric Field, But Sufficient to Explain the Polar Wind

    “It’s more than enough to counteract the gravity acting on hydrogen ions, which are the most abundant particles in the polar wind,” says Alex Glocer, co-author of the study, in a NASA press release. With an effect ten times greater than that of gravity, “it’s even enough to eject them from our atmosphere at supersonic speeds.”

    Researchers believe that the ambipolar field, as a fundamental field of our planet alongside gravity and magnetism, may have continuously shaped our atmosphere over time — in a way they now hope to begin exploring. And since they have now shown that a planet’s internal dynamics can create an ambipolar electric field, they suggest that similar electric fields should exist on other planets, particularly on Venus and Mars. All that remains is to measure them too…