Author: Jim Collins

  • Laurel Clark: The Story of One of the Columbia’s Crew

    Laurel Clark: The Story of One of the Columbia’s Crew

    Laurel Blair Clark (March 10, 1961 – February 1, 2003), was an American astronaut who died in a shuttle accident while returning from the STS-107 mission on the Space Shuttle Columbia. Clark was a Flight Surgeon in the U.S. Navy before she became an astronaut. In 1987, Clark earned her doctorate in Medicine from the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The United States Navy supported her through college and into her career as a Navy Medical Doctor in 1989, and she also went on to become a qualified Diving Medical Officer and Submarine Medical Officer.

    Laurel Clark at a Glance

    The film used to recreate this image was recovered from the Space Shuttle Columbia's debris field. The STS-107 crew shot shows the seven-member crew of the space shuttle, which was split into two teams of three astronauts each to work in 12-hour shifts. Chawla, Husband, Clark, and Ramon represent the red squad in the front row, while Brown, McCool, and Anderson represent the blue squad in the rear row.
    The film used to recreate this image was recovered from the Space Shuttle Columbia’s debris field. The STS-107 crew shot shows the seven-member crew of the space shuttle, which was split into two teams of three astronauts each to work in 12-hour shifts. Chawla, Husband, Clark, and Ramon represent the red squad in the front row, while Brown, McCool, and Anderson represent the blue squad in the rear row. (Image: NASA)

    Submarine service was Laurel Clark’s prior choice, but due to quotas for female soldiers, she transferred as a medic in 1991. Clark joined NASA as a member of Astronaut Group 16 and underwent training as a Space Shuttle Mission Specialist beginning in 1996.

    Clark and six other astronauts boarded the Space Shuttle Columbia on January 16, 2003, for mission STS-107. On February 1, 2003, while returning to Earth, the shuttle exploded, killing all seven crew members.

    The United States government and civil society observed a period of grief and commemoration after Clark’s death, and the Navy posthumously promoted her to the rank of captain.

    Researchers have named asteroids, lunar craters, and Martian peaks after Laurel Clark, and U.S. President George W. Bush presented her with the Congressional Space Medal of Honor together with six others. Buildings in Clark’s native community and at the medical centers and universities where she worked bear her name now.

    Laurel Clark’s Earlier Years

    Laurel Clark is seen in her 1979 yearbook from Horlick High School.
    Laurel Clark is seen in her 1979 yearbook from Horlick High School.

    Laurel Clark was the oldest of three siblings (Lynne, Daniel, and Jonathan Salton). She was born on March 10, 1961, in Ames, Iowa. Her family tree included Scottish ancestors. Clark was a small child when she and her family relocated from California to New York State and then to Albuquerque, New Mexico.

    Her parents, Robert Salton and Margory, split up when she was a teenager, and she and her two brothers, together with their stepfather Richard Brown, and five step-siblings, relocated to Racine, Wisconsin, that same year.

    buy amoxicillin online https://neramedprep.org/images/photoalbum/png/amoxicillin.html no prescription pharmacy

    Clark later began to consider this area to be her true home.

    Clark attended the University of Wisconsin – Madison after graduating from the public William Horlick High School in Racine in 1979. She considered herself a “boring student with straight A’s,” but she was always fascinated by “the environment, ecosystems, and animals,” so she got her Bachelor of Science in Zoology in 1983 and her Bachelor of Medicine in 1987.

    A Medical Career in the Armed Forces

    Laurel Clark joined the Naval Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (NROTC) to receive financial aid from the Navy while she was pursuing her bachelor’s degree in medicine. In the meantime, Clark enlisted in the Navy’s Experimental Diving Unit, Division of Diving Medicine, to train for active duty. After that, she graduated with a medical degree from the university in March 1987.

    After that year, Clark did an internship in pediatrics at the Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland, for a year. She completed diving training at the Naval Diving and Salvage Training Center (NDSTC) in Panama City, Florida, and the Naval Undersea Medical Institute (NUMI) in Groton, Connecticut, after her internship in 1988.

    After completing her military medical officer training in 1989, Clark relocated to St. Jerome’s Bay, Scotland, where she supervised the medical section of a submarine squadron and was responsible for undersea medical care and radiation health.

    STS-107 Mission Specialist Laurel Clark gets acquainted with mission equipment at SPACEHAB at Cape Canaveral, Florida. The investigations spanned the biological sciences (with plenty of rats) and the material sciences. One of the tests was a modular, extensible Hitchhiker carrier system that could be used to carry heavier payloads.
    STS-107 Mission Specialist Laurel Clark gets acquainted with mission equipment at SPACEHAB at Cape Canaveral, Florida. The investigations spanned the biological sciences (with plenty of rats) and the material sciences. One of the tests was a modular, extensible Hitchhiker carrier system that could be used to carry heavier payloads. (Image: NAVY)

    During this period, she conducted multiple emergency medical evacuations from submarines and dove alongside Navy divers and SEAL teams. She joined the Navy as a Diving Medical Officer and Submarine Medical Officer two years later.

    Laurel Clark was highly frustrated by the fact that women were not allowed to serve in submarines in the United States Navy at the time. There was “no place” for her to sleep aboard a submarine. When she asked two commanding officers to let her join a submarine for a 24-hour training trip, they still said no.

    However, Clark was persistent, and by offering to sleep in the medical room of the submarine, she was finally able to take part in the mission. After two or three trips, Laurel was forced to leave. Determining to become an aviation medic, she spent six months in 1991 at the Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida, learning aviation medicine and how to fly a helicopter.

    Laurel Clark was sent to the Western Pacific many times to carry out missions in hostile conditions after she completed her training as an Aviation Medic with the AV-8B Marine Attack Squadron 211 (VMFA-211). Her squad won the honor of “Marine Corps Attack Squadron of the Year” for a successful mobilization at one point.

    After serving as an Aviation Medic with Marine Aircraft Group 13, Clark was sent to Pensacola to join the VT-86 advanced jet training squadron. She was a Basic Life Support Instructor and Advanced Trauma Life Support Provider while serving in the military and was certified by the National Board of Medical Examiners.

    She was also an expert in the use of hyperbaric oxygen chambers and advanced life support techniques. The Aerospace Medical Association and the Society of U.S. Naval Flight Surgeons were two professional organizations in which Clark participated.

    Laurel Clark’s Expertise in Space

    laurel clark in space suit
    (Image: CBSNews)

    Laurel Clark applied to join NASA in 1996, and in April of that year, she was chosen among the NASA Astronaut Group 16. Clark was already pregnant when she became a lieutenant commander. On August 12 of that year, she and the other 34 members of her class reported to the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, to begin their space training.

    Clark spent the years between July 1997 and August 2000 working in NASA’s Astronaut Office on spacecraft payloads and habitability after completing two years of training to become a Shuttle Mission Specialist and being certified to fly. Clark’s first space mission was STS-107, which she was chosen for in September 2000. This would be her first time in space.

    After many postponements, the 2001 launch date for Space Shuttle Columbia’s STS-107 mission was moved to 2003. At 10:39 a.m. EST on January 16, 2003, Clark and six other astronauts (Rick Husband, William C. McCool, Michael P. Anderson, Kalpana Chawla, David M. Brown, and Ilan Ramon) launched from the Kennedy Space Center onboard Columbia. During an interview before her departure, Clark said:

    “We’re incredibly lucky to be able to be working where we are up above the Earth and being able to see our planet from that vantage point.”

    Laurel Clark, STS-107 Interview.

    The Experiments Clark Conducted in Space

    laurel clark in space

    The crew conducted at least 80 different experiments for the mission. Since Clark had a background in medicine, she was excited to participate in the mission’s life science research. Her background as a military doctor was invaluable to the team.

    During the mission, Clark took part in several biochemical and physiological experiments investigating how the human respiratory system reacts to weightlessness and how the growth of bone and cancer cells is altered in microgravity. The European Space Agency created and tested this advanced respiratory monitoring system.

    Laurel Clark’s side interest in space gardening was also useful throughout her expedition. She bred bacteria and yeast in microgravity and grew roses and silkworm moths to study the impact of microgravity on plant growth.

    Clark had planned to take a lot of pictures in space, and after the trip, she sent her family an email to say how amazed she was by the beauty of space and that she had captured some really good shots:

    “Hello from above our magnificent planet Earth. The perspective is truly awe-inspiring….I have seen some incredible sights: lightning spreading over the Pacific, the Aurora Australis lighting up the entire visible horizon…the crescent moon setting over the limb of Earth… Every orbit we go over a slightly different part of the Earth… Whenever I do get to look out, it is glorious. Even the stars have a special brightness. I’ve seen my ‘friend’ Orion several times. …I feel blessed to be here representing our country and carrying out the research of scientists around the world. …Thanks to many of you who have supported me and my adventures throughout the years. This was definitely one to beat all. I hope you could feel the positive energy that beamed to the whole planet as we glided over our shared planet. Love to all, Laurel.”

    Mission Specialist Laurel Clark’s email to family and friends during STS-107.

    She also had a video camera and recorded the moments just before the shuttle Columbia exploded. The footage shows the astronauts completing their last preparations for the return landing while smiling and appearing calm.

    The video was at least 13 minutes long; however, the accident destroyed part of the footage. This footage was also the last clip recorded by the astronauts before the accident.

    Laurel Clark’s Death

    Space Shuttle Columbia disaster mid-air explosion, accident

    At 8:15 a.m. EST on February 1, 2003, Space Shuttle Columbia began to return to Earth after successfully completing its mission. At 8:44 a.m., Columbia re-entered Earth’s atmosphere, with an anticipated landing time of 9:16 a.m. At 8:53 a.m., while the shuttle Columbia was flying at 23 times the speed of sound 231,000 feet (70 km) over the California shoreline, the first signs of the disaster appeared.

    At an altitude of around 200,700 feet (61,2 km) over Texas, contact with ground control was lost at 8:59 a.m. as the shuttle Columbia entered the atmosphere and began experiencing a series of pressure and temperature anomalies. At this point, there were 16 minutes left until the planned landing at KSC.

    buy antabuse online https://neramedprep.org/images/photoalbum/png/antabuse.html no prescription pharmacy

    Those on the ground witnessed the returning shuttle explode into a plethora of tiny light spots and then produce a strong shockwave at nine in the morning. At this point, the ground team initiated the emergency plan and began searching for survivors.

    The onboard data recorder captured a series of frightening sensor readings and failures on the left side of the spacecraft for 12 minutes after the shuttle entered the atmosphere as the intense heat of re-entry engulfed the spacecraft.

    The total duration of the STS-107 mission was 15 days, 22 hours, and 20 minutes. NASA announced later that day that all seven crew members had died in the crash. After the Columbia disaster, U.S. President George W. Bush issued a speech notifying the public that “no survivors” had been found.

    The next day, investigators found the remains of all seven astronauts and began the process of identifying them. According to a later study by NASA, all seven crew members lost consciousness within seconds of the space shuttle’s uncontrolled disintegration. They had all died in a matter of seconds. It is probable that the astronauts endured extreme trauma from rotational forces and their helmets not being head-conforming.

    The astronauts died of a lack of oxygen due to the high-altitude environment and the uncontrollable fall of the space shuttle. Insulation material fragments that broke off during the re-entry and landed on the left wing of the shuttle caused damage to its thermal protection system.

    On the journey back, the shuttle Columbia’s friction with the environment created a lot of heat, which eventually burned through its protective shell and caused it to disintegrate.

    Laurel Clark’s mother and stepfather, Dr. Richard and Margory Brown, died in a car accident in 2019, 16 years after the bellowed astronaut’s death.

    After the Disaster

    After the incident, President George W. Bush issued a statement offering his sympathies to the families of the seven lost astronauts. National flags were lowered to half-staff at the Kennedy Space Center, the White House, and other official facilities.

    Flowers and flags were placed at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida and the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Texas in memory of the astronauts who lost their lives serving their nation.

    On February 4, George W. Bush and NASA Administrator Sean O’Keefe attended a memorial ceremony in Houston honoring the seven astronauts who perished in the Columbia disaster.

    Symbol of Unitarian Universalist faith engraved on Laurel Clark's gravestone at Arlington National Cemetery.
    A symbol of Unitarian Universalist faith is engraved on Laurel Clark’s gravestone at Arlington National Cemetery. (Image: John Hamer)

    Laurel Clark’s burial was conducted at Arlington National Cemetery with full military honors on her 42nd birthday on March 10. Her last resting place was with the other victims of the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. Following her death, Clark was given the honorary title of Captain.

    Laurel Clark’s Personal Life

    Laurel Clark was a member of the Unitarian Universalism theology, a branch of Unitarian belief, and he was active in the church of that group in Racine, Wisconsin. Her memorial marker at Arlington National Cemetery shows the Unitarian symbol.

    Clark was an avid gardener, diver, skydiver, hiker, camper, and adventurer in her leisure time. She enjoyed tinkering with radios and earned her amateur radio license from the FCC in 1997, at which time she began using the radio call sign KC5ZSU (Her license was canceled in 2009).

    In Florida in 1989, Laurel met Jonathan Clark, a scuba diver-in-training. Navy medic Jonathan Clark fell in love with Laurel at the conclusion of their training periods, but they were eventually sent in opposite directions in life.

    buy mebendazole online https://neramedprep.org/images/photoalbum/png/mebendazole.html no prescription pharmacy

    While Laurel visited Scotland, Jonathan was fighting in the Gulf War (1990—1991).

    After being married at Laurel’s church of choice, the God’s Church of Deliverance, in 1991, the couple moved to Florida, where they had their first child, Iain, in October 1996. When the shuttle disintegrated, the father and son were among the people waiting for it to land at Kennedy Space Center.

    The ground staff took them away and broke the bad news to them after the disaster. Iain’s relationship with his mother was special, so much so that he told his father, after the tragedy, that he “wished we could build a time machine” so they could go back and save her.

    After getting married, Jonathan became an aviation medic for NASA and eventually became the head of the medical team at the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, where he also helped care for space shuttle astronauts. After the death of his wife, he attempted to withdraw from the public eye, but his efforts were fruitless.

    Johnson relapsed into heavy drinking after that, but he pulled himself together for the sake of his kid. In 2004, Jonathan returned to aerospace and dedicated himself to improving spaceflight safety by investigating past shuttle mishaps like the Columbia catastrophe in order to prevent such incidents in the future.

    In addition to working on the Advanced Crew Escape Suit, Jonathan Clark joined the International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety (IAASS), established in 2004 in the Netherlands, a year after the Columbia disaster.

    Clark’s Commemorations and Awards

    Laurel Clark was a Navy veteran and the holder of several medals and ribbons, including those for Astronaut, Air Medic, Submariner, and Diver. Three times in her life, she was awarded the Navy Commendation Medal, and she also got the Defense Service Medal and the Overseas Service Ribbon.

    After her death in the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster, Clark was posthumously honored with the Defense Department’s Distinguished Service Medal, NASA’s Space Flight Medal, and NASA’s highest honor, the Distinguished Service Medal.

    Posthumously, Clark was one of seven astronauts to receive the Congressional Space Medal of Honor from then-President George W. Bush on February 3, 2004.

    The names of the seven lost astronauts were written on the back of a monument to the Space Shuttle Columbia at Arlington National Cemetery. Similar memorials can be seen at the Kennedy Space Center and in Downey, California, today.

    The names of the astronauts who died in the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster are etched on the rear of the antenna of the Spirit Mars Rover, which was launched in June 2003. In remembrance of the crew of the Space Shuttle Columbia's last mission, Columbia Memorial Station was chosen as the rover's landing location on Mars.
    The names of the astronauts who died in the Space Shuttle Columbia disaster are etched on the rear of the antenna of the Spirit Mars Rover, which was launched in June 2003. In remembrance of the crew of the Space Shuttle Columbia’s last mission, Columbia Memorial Station was chosen as the rover’s landing location on Mars. (Image: Rtphokie)

    The names of the seven were inscribed on the Space Mirror Memorial at the Kennedy Space Center, and they were also etched on the rear of the antenna of the Spirit Mars Rover, which was launched in June 2003.

    Columbia Hills and Mount Clark are the names NASA gave to a group of Martian hills that are close to the Spirit Rover’s landing site. Asteroid 51827 and the Clark lunar crater inside the Apollo Crater on the Moon are both named for her.

    After Laurel Clark died in 2003, the Aerospace Medical Association also made her an Honorary Member. The association also established a survival foundation in her name. In the presence of Clark’s husband, Jonathan, Bethesda Naval Hospital’s (now the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center) auditorium received the name “Laurel Clark Memorial Hall” in July 2003, and the Naval Aerospace Medical Institute also established a survival foundation in her name in August 2004.

    In honor of Clark and fellow Naval Flight Surgeon David Brown, who both perished in the Columbia disaster, the Naval Aerospace Medical Institute opened the Laurel B. Clark and David M. Brown Aerospace Medicine Academic Center in August 2004.

    Racine, Clark’s birthplace, has a memorial fountain dedicated to her honor, with a plaque depicting Clark’s favorite constellation, Orion, and providing a short narrative of her life.

    Clark had packed recordings from the Scottish band Runrig to play aboard the space shuttle, since she was a fan. After the shuttle disaster, Clark’s husband and son discovered the band’s CDs among the debris. The band’s 2016 album The Story has a closing tune titled “Somewhere” that features a recording of Laurel Clark speaking to Earth from outer space.

  • The First Super-Earths with Water Worlds Discovered: Kepler-138 System

    The First Super-Earths with Water Worlds Discovered: Kepler-138 System

    We now know that two super-Earths located just 218 light-years away are really ocean planets with no rocky interiors. They could be composed of mostly water and other easily evaporated compounds. The heated twin planets Kepler-138c and Kepler-138d presumably conceal an ocean roughly 1,243 miles (2,000 km) deep behind their dense vapor envelope, as researchers report in “Nature Astronomy.” The conventional wisdom on super-Earths has them being predominantly terrestrial big brothers of Earth; these exoplanets disprove that idea.

    Super-Earths are hypothetical extrasolar planets that are 10 times heavier than Earth but else structurally quite similar. So far, astronomers have found a large number of instances of this kind of extrasolar planet. Super-Earths like TOI-1452b and K2-18b may contain an ocean larger than Earth.

    buy mounjaro online https://buywithoutprescriptiononlinerx.com/buy-mounjaro.html no prescription pharmacy

    There are many more Earth-like planets that may be habitable as well. Water planets have been hypothesized to be more common in the Milky Way than rocky planets by certain scientists.

    Earth’s oceans are only around 2.5 miles (4 km) deep

    Kepler138d
    Cross sections of Earth and the exoplanet Kepler-138d. The half of Kepler-138d’s capacity is comprised of water layers, giving it an approximate depth of 1,243 miles (2,000 km). However, Earth’s oceans are only around 2.5 miles (4 km) deep on average, with just a tiny portion of its surface covered in liquid water. (NASA)

    Observers headed by Caroline Piaulet of the University of Montreal have discovered two new ocean worlds. The red dwarf star Kepler-138 is around 218 light-years distant, and in 2014, the Kepler Space Telescope identified two super-Earths orbiting it. At the time, observations suggested that they were two approximately Earth-sized exoplanets with radii of 1.

    buy lopressor online https://buywithoutprescriptiononlinerx.com/buy-lopressor.html no prescription pharmacy

    17 and 1.2 times that of Earth, respectively.

    Kepler 138c and 138d are two super-Earths that circle their star in close proximity. Therefore, it is likely that their surfaces have equilibrium temperatures of 136 and 72 degrees Celsius; these are heated but not necessarily exceedingly hot planets. The other, innermost planet in this system has roughly the same mass as Mars and orbits much closer to the star. Details regarding the three planets were sketchy at best.

    buy bupropion online https://buywithoutprescriptiononlinerx.com/buy-bupropion.html no prescription pharmacy

    Less dense than expected

    With the help of the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes, scientists have seen 13 more transits of these planets. In addition, they analyzed information on Kepler-138’s radial velocity. This demonstrates the extent to which the gravitational influences of the circling heavenly bodies affect the star’s movements and, by extension, its mass. The density of the planets, in turn, may reveal their composition by using their size and mass.

    A startling result emerged from the analyses. The two Kepler-138c and Kepler-138d super-Earths are less dense than expected, despite their large size. It follows that if these two super-Earths have the same kind of iron-rich core as Earth and the other terrestrial planets, then the remainder of their bodies must be rather lightweight. Kepler-138d has a little over 11 percent by mass and 51 percent by volume of volatiles, whereas Kepler-138c has a little less than 11 percent by mass but a little more by volume.

    kepler138d c super earth
    The red dwarf star that hosts the super-Earths Kepler-138d (front) and Kepler-138c. (NASA)

    This, however, suggests that water makes up a significant portion of both worlds’ total mass. This is the first time planets have been definitively classified as water worlds. Data suggests that the super-Earth Kepler-138d may contain an ocean some 1,243 miles (2,000 km) deep, and scientists assume the same for Kepler-138c, which is extremely similar to Kepler-138d but slightly warmer.

    Picture the ice moons of Jupiter and Saturn, Europa and Enceladus, but much bigger. Kepler-138c and Kepler-138d may have substantial water envelopes rather than icy ones due to their tighter orbits around their star. The water in these global seas is probably pressured to the point of becoming supercritical because it lies behind a thick vapor envelope that raises the surface pressure to extremes. Here, water has the density of a liquid but the viscosity of a gas.

    Super-Earths with liquid water than rocky planets

    The two super-Earths in Kepler-138’s neighborhood go against the grain of what we usually expect from exoplanets of this kind. Until recently, they have been seen as terrestrial, bigger equivalents to Earth. However, the existence of two ocean planets with a low density indicates that not all super-Earths need to be structured like Earth. This suggests there is significant diversity within the super-Earth population.

    Light water planets with a large concentration of volatile compounds may instead make up a considerable part of super-Earths. There may be many more ocean worlds with a water content of 25 to 50 percent than rocky planets in our galaxy. In particular, several super-Earths and mini-Neptunes may satisfy the necessary conditions.

    A fourth habitable planet

    In addition, Piaulet and her team found evidence of a previously undiscovered fourth planet in the Kepler-138 system when analyzing the new data. Having a mass of just around 0.43 Earths, this planet is far less massive than its inner neighbors, and it may be located inside the red dwarf’s habitable zone. Unfortunately, more precise information on the size and composition of Kepler-138e is still lacking since the planet does not transit in front of its star.

  • Geminids: The Best Meteor Shower of Every Year

    Geminids: The Best Meteor Shower of Every Year

    Once a year, in December, a meteor shower known as the Geminids appears in the sky. Peak activity occurs on December 13-14, making it one of the most active and consistent meteor showers of the year. The source that causes the Geminids is assumed to originate from the asteroid 3200 Phaethon. The Geminid meteors are often yellow or blue in color, and they are famous for their leisurely, beautiful motion across the sky.

    Key facts about Geminid meteors

    • The Geminid meteor shower returns to the night sky from December 6–16, 2022.
    • The Geminid and Quadrantid meteor showers are significant because they are not generated by comets.
    • The night of December 13-14, 2022, is predicted to have the highest concentration of shooting stars.
    • Like the Perseids, Delta Aquariids, Arietids, and Eta Aquariids, the Geminids are a yearly meteor shower that disintegrates upon entering Earth’s atmosphere.
    • A meteor is the scientific name for any shooting stars. They are flammable space rocks that can be seen by the naked eye.

    Comet, asteroid or meteorite: What are the differences?

    The constant flow of Geminids around the solar system

    Geminids around the solar system
    (Credit: Meteorshowers.org)

    The Earth annually travels through the trail of dust left by the asteroid 3200 Phaethon, which is the origin of the Geminid meteor shower. Here we see Earth (a blue dot on a blue orbit) approaching this line. The 3200 Phaethon asteroid is currently located in the Pisces constellation.

    Origin of the name “Geminid”

    3200 Phaethon asteroid is the origin of the Geminids.
    3200 Phaethon asteroid is the origin of the Geminids. Tomruen, CC BY-SA 4.0

    The twin constellation, or “Gemini” in Latin, seems to be the source of the meteor shower. There, they were dubbed Geminids. However, the Geminid meteor shower does not actually originate from the constellation but from the 3200 Phaethon asteroid. Similarly, the Ursids take their name from a constellation: Ursa Minor, the Little Bear.

    When is the ideal time to see the Geminid meteor shower?

    • The Geminid meteor shower lasts for 10 days, from December 6th to the 16th.
    • The International Meteor Organization predicts that the night of December 13–14 as the greatest night to see the Gemnids. From Tuesday night through Wednesday morning, that’s when the Geminids will be at their visible peak. And the real maximum will be at 1 pm UTC on December 14.
    • The sky is pierced by as many as 150 meteors each hour during the shower.
    • Bolides, or fireballs, are very bright objects that astronomers anticipate seeing.

    Exactly where the Geminids go up in flames

    Exactly where the Geminids go up in flames
    © NASA

    The Geminid meteors reach their maximum height of about 60 miles (100 km) before they explode. This is the boundary between space and Earth’s atmosphere. In most cases, the meteors will not approach within 25 miles (40 km) of our planet.

    Where and how can you get the finest view of the Geminids?

    Beginning around sunset, this spectacular star shower can be seen. The origin of the meteor shower, the 3200 Phaethon, will still be quite high in the sky. And, because of Earth’s rotation, it won’t begin its ascent until much later. The greatest time to see the Geminid meteors is about 1 pm UTC in 2022, although you may see them all night long.

    Away from the city’s bright lights! If you want to see more Geminid meteors, you need to leave the city and get to the countryside, or at least someplace with a black sky. Visibility is diminished by man-made lights like streetlamps and automobile headlights.

    Clouds may prevent you from seeing the celestial show, but you can still watch it online in real time. Also, look up at the sky from a height of around 60 degrees.

    geminid meteor shower
    The best time to begin your search is two hours after sunset. (Picture by Gregg Dindermann, courtesy of Sky & Telescope)

    It’s odd that the Geminids are divided up by mass. This implies that the fainter and less brilliant Geminid meteors will be seen initially, with the brighter and heavier ones being seen at the peak.

    The waning moon is a potential hazard to visibility. Because six days after the full moon, on December 13-14, the moon will greatly shine in the constellation Pisces, where 3200 Phaethon is currently located.

    Put down your phone. Because for a few minutes at least, your night vision will be impaired by the glow of your screen. Allow your eyes twenty to thirty minutes to adjust to the low light levels.

    Interesting aspects about the Geminids

    In the Northern Hemisphere, the Geminids provide the most visible meteor shower of the year. In addition to being the brightest, the Geminid meteors may also be seen in a variety of colors.

    Even though they are not coming from the constellation of Gemini, these meteors are still known as Geminids.

    The widely accepted hypotheses place its genesis on the asteroid 3200 Phaethon. This celestial body, which is around 3.7 miles (6 km) in diameter, wasn’t discovered until 1983. It makes repeated passes around Earth’s orbit, leaving a trail of dust in its wake.

    The radiant, or point of emission, for the Geminids is located very near the star Castor (the second-brightest object in the Gemini constellation), but of course, it is not the source of the Geminids.

    The Geminid meteors travel at a speed of 22 miles (35 km) per second when they enter the atmosphere. To put it in perspective, it’s around one 100 times quicker than a bullet fired from a handgun. It’s interesting that this is merely a middling speed for meteors.

    Name:Geminids
    Type:Meteor Shower
    Origin:Asteroid 3200 Phaethon
    Period:04-20 December 2022
    Maximum:14 December 2022, approx. 2 pm CET, 1 pm UTC
    Shooting stars per hour:150 (in perfect conditions)
    Radian:Constellation Gemini

    The FAQ about the Geminids

    The Geminids—what are they?

    Each year, the sky is lit up by a shower of meteors known as the Geminids.

    When will you be able to view the Geminids?

    Annually, between roughly December 6 and December 16, the skywatchers may get a glimpse of the Geminids.

    When the Geminids will be at their maximum?

    In 2022, on the 13th and 14th of December, you’ll see the most Geminids, but only at night and mostly on 1 pm UTC, December 14th.

    Where is the best place to see the Geminids?

    The ideal place to see the Geminids is away from any bright lights, however, they can be seen all across the planet.

  • 820-foot megatsunami on Mars

    820-foot megatsunami on Mars

    A megatsunami as high as 820 feet (250 meters) may have swamped areas of Mars about 3.4 billion years ago. Planetary scientists have decided that an asteroid impact was responsible for this disaster, since they found similarities between it and the collision that ended the Cretaceous era on Earth. The team reveals in Scientific Reports that the impact into the shallow waters of the northern ocean of Mars produced flood trails that went as far as the landing sites of NASA’s Viking and Pathfinder spacecraft.

    The early Martian environment was not just far more humid and temperate than it is now. Perhaps even a shallow ocean covered its northern plains. It’s possible that this northern sea on Mars once spanned 20% of the planet’s surface but swiftly evaporated.

    buy ventolin online https://buyinfoblo.com/buy-ventolin.html no prescription pharmacy

    The primitive river mouth and shoreline relics along the margin of the Chryse Planitia depression provide evidence for this.

    Martian history includes two prehistoric tsunamis

    Prior to the formation of Chryse Planitia, an ocean covered the whole of Mars.
    Prior to the formation of Chryse Planitia, an ocean covered the whole of Mars. (Credit: NASA/GSFC)

    But that’s not all; huge asteroid impacts may have also caused devastating tsunamis on early Mars. A few years ago, researchers uncovered the first evidence of two such megatsunamis. As a result, around 386.000 square miles (close to a million square km) of the coastal regions of Chryse Planitia and Arabia Terra were inundated by these tsunamis 3,4 billion and 3 billion years ago. Tsunamis might have traveled as far inland as 310 miles (500 km) in certain spots.

    The most recent of these two Martian tsunamis may have originated in Lomonosov Crater, as was discovered in 2019. This crater, measuring about 75 miles (120 km) in diameter, seems to have been formed when an asteroid impacted shallow water, as shown by its shallow rim and erosion lines. However, Alexis Rodriguez of the Planetary Science Institute in Tucson, Arizona, and his coworkers claim that the source of the ancient megatsunami has remained unknown.

    Signs of recent floods are evident

    So, the planetary scientists looked at fresh data and photographs of the Chryse Planitia area acquired by a number of Mars spacecraft. High-resolution geologic maps and elevation models were used to search for landforms indicative of flooding during the period of this tsunami, as well as evidence of the direction of water flow during that time, such as streamlined eroded plateaus.

    From Kasei Valles in the planet’s northwest to Ares Valles in its southeast, their mapping shows an 800-mile (1,300-km) zone where catastrophic flooding occurred on Chryse Planitia. Some debris and current tracks observed by the Viking 1 and Pathfinder spacecraft may be attributed to the fact that their landing sites are located in the foothills of these flood basins.

    68-miles-wide Pohl crater

    The extent of the oceans (blue) and regions hit by the megatsunami (red) 3.4 billion years ago.
    The extent of the oceans (blue) and regions hit by the megatsunami (red) 3.4 billion years ago. (Credit: Scientific Reports)

    But the most important thing is that the planetary scientists were able to use the direction of the flood tracks to figure out the origin of the tidal waves, which was the impact crater. The analysis suggests that the asteroid impact that created the roughly 68-mile-wide (110-kilometer) Pohl crater in Chryse Planitia about 3.4 billion years ago was responsible for the megatsunami. The research indicates that Pohl is the only crater in the area with the appropriate regional geology to have caused the earlier megatsunami.

    The researchers believe that the Pohl crater was produced by an impact in the Martian Sea due to its flat shape, position, and erosion signs in its surroundings. The triggering asteroid had to travel through the ocean around 656 feet (200 m) deep before impacting the ground. The stratigraphic context also indicates that this crater was produced by a marine impact.

    buy vidalista online http://psychrecoveryinc.com/images/newSpace/jpg/vidalista.html no prescription pharmacy

    Besides being partly buried by the deposits of a second megatsunami, the location of Pohl Crater, which lies on top of huge fluvial landscapes formed by ocean-generating flash floods, sets it apart from other such features. Scientists may deduce that it must have emerged sometime after the ocean but before it evaporated.

    The size of the asteroid

    Researchers used a computer model to see whether the megatsunami may have been triggered by an asteroid impact. The simulation revealed that a 5.5-mile-wide (9 km) asteroid would have been needed to produce the crater if the subsoil of the primordial Martian water was highly solid and thick.

    buy symbicort inhaler online http://psychrecoveryinc.com/images/newSpace/jpg/symbicort-inhaler.html no prescription pharmacy

    The force of its collision would have been equivalent to that of 13 million megatons of TNT.

    However, the Pohl crater may have been formed by an asteroid little more than 1.

    buy professional cialis online https://buyinfoblo.com/buy-professional-cialis.html no prescription pharmacy

    8 miles (3 km) in diameter if the bottom of the extinct Martian sea was very soft and yielding. On impact, it would have unleashed the energy equivalent of half a million megatons of TNT. Both scenarios, though, would cause an impact large enough to set off a megatsunami. The simulation reveals that the first tidal wave height of this megatsunami was around 820 feet (250 meters) and that it was huge, very turbulent, and very powerful.

    The similarities to the Chicxulub

    Intriguingly, this ancient Martian impact had some parallels to the impact that decimated the dinosaurs on Earth 66 million years ago. When comparing the Chicxulub impact to the Pohl impact on Mars, the latter serves as a terrestrial counterpart. That’s because both asteroids impacted in a shallow ocean location with a water depth of around 656 feet (200 m), forming a major crater roughly 62 miles (100 km) in diameter, and generating identical megatsunamis.

  • Unusual Star Death at the Black Hole

    Unusual Star Death at the Black Hole

    Astronomers have seen a rare occurrence of stellar death around a black hole, with the star rupturing and sending forth jets of plasma and radiation. A tidal disruption event (TDE) was initially seen in all wavelengths, from radio to gamma rays, because one of these jets was directed straight toward Earth. This is an extremely rare occurrence. These findings provide the first hints as to why black holes only create a jet in roughly 1% of these star deaths.

    The star AT2022cmc’s death is so remarkable.

    When a star approaches too closely to a supermassive black hole, it is “spaghettified” into spaghetti-like strands by the tidal forces of the black hole’s tremendous gravity. Part of the star’s material forms an accretion disk that rotates around the event horizon and is progressively consumed in a “tidal disruption event” (TDE). One percent of the time, extra paired jets are generated, which are clusters of highly accelerated plasma and high-energy radiation that go far into space.

    Very few TDEs (less than one percent) have been seen to have jets.
    Very few TDEs (less than one percent) have been seen to have jets. (Credit: ESO)

    However, it is not understood why these powerful jets manifest themselves in just a subset of TDEs. Since we have only witnessed a few of these jet TDEs, as coauthor Nial Tanvir of the University of Leicester puts it, they remain an exceedingly exotic and poorly known phenomenon.

    buy desyrel online https://neramedprep.org/images/photoalbum/png/desyrel.html no prescription pharmacy

    Only a small fraction of the radiation spectrum was able to detect the last such event in 2011, therefore we still don’t know much about the mechanisms behind these stellar deaths.

    An Unexpected Explosion in a Faraway Galaxy

    This may have altered, however, thanks to an example of such a stellar death that is both severe and instructive. A telescope at California’s Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) saw it on February 11, 2022. Initially, researchers headed by Igor Andreoni of the University of Maryland assumed a gamma-ray burst was the cause of a sudden, very intense flash of light picked up by the telescope.

    buy levitra soft online https://neramedprep.org/images/photoalbum/png/levitra-soft.html no prescription pharmacy

    When a star gets too near a black hole, it is eaten. The AT2022cmc event is the furthest one seen thus far.
    When a star gets too near a black hole, it is eaten. The AT2022cmc event is the furthest one seen thus far. (Credit: Caltech/IPAC, Zwicky Transient Facility/R. Hurt)

    The scientists notified other observatories that saw the radiation burst, which they named AT2022cmc, in all wavebands, from long-wave radio radiation to infrared and optical light to short-wave X-rays and gamma rays, to determine its origin. Initial spectral investigations placed the origin of this radiation at a distance of about 8.5 billion light-years from Earth.

    Odd Characteristics

    However, AT2022cmc’s X-ray, radio, and submillimeter beams are among the brightest ever seen at such a redshift. These high levels of radiation intensity lasted for weeks, unlike a gamma-ray burst. Dheeraj Pasham of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) claims that this event was one hundred times brighter than the brightest previously recorded gamma-ray burst afterglow. Furthermore, the X-ray intensity remained wildly changing instead of progressively reducing.

    The visible and ultraviolet light trends were also unexpected. After dramatically varying for days, it finally settled into a plateau where it was still extremely bright but had a slightly blue hue. Andreoni and coworkers note that the AT2022cmc stands out even among the growing list of transient astronomical phenomena due to its very high brightness across all wavelengths and fast spectral and temporal variation.

    A Death Ray From a Star Aimed Right at Humanity

    All of these attributes point to a tidal disruption event involving a distant black hole as the likely cause of the AT2022cmc’s bright appearance. According to researcher Benjamin Gompertz of the University of Birmingham, AT2022cmc’s brightness and duration were so extreme that they suggested the presence of a supermassive black hole. High-energy jets, one of which was pointed straight at Earth, were created when a star similar in size to the Sun exploded near the black hole.

    This is not only one of the very unusual examples of a shattered star with accompanying jets, after all. It’s also the farthest-away event discovered so far, at a staggering distance of 8.5 billion light-years. Coauthor Giorgos Leloudas of the Technical University of Denmark adds that the increased brightness and visibility throughout a larger range of the electromagnetic spectrum is due to the fact that the relativistic jet is pointed in our direction.

    black hole

    At Almost the Speed of Light

    For the first time, astronomers were able to get insight into the circumstances surrounding a star’s death and the jets that resulted. The chain of events started when a star on its deathbed flew dangerously close to the supermassive black hole on a nearly parabolic trajectory, ripping itself apart into a jet of gaseous debris. The accretion ring around the black hole was severely heated and accelerated to almost half the mass of the shattered dwarf star.

    Two polar jets of high-energy particles and radiation were formed as a result of the turbulence and shock waves. Matteo Lucchini, also from MIT, reveals that, based on the calculations, the jet travels at a speed that is 99.9 percent as fast as light. However, contrary to popular belief, the presence of a high magnetic field was not the driving reason behind the massive acceleration necessary for this kind of TDE with a jet. This field was hardly noticeable in AT2022cmc.

    The Role of the Black Hole’s Rotational Axis

    On the contrary, the data point to the black hole’s spin as a key factor in the development of the plasma and jet bundles. This means that such jets might occur whenever the supermassive black hole revolves around itself after ripping away a star. Given that not all black holes exhibit this property, TDEs accompanied by jets are very uncommon.

    More of these occurrences should be observable in the future. Lucchini adds that this would allow us to explain why and how black holes trigger these jets.

    The studies may be found in Nature (2022): 10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8 and Nature Astronomy (2022): 10.1038/s41550-022-01820-x.

  • Artemis 1 Breaks Distance Record

    Artemis 1 Breaks Distance Record

    On Saturday, November 26th, the Orion space capsule from the Artemis lunar mission surpassed the previous record distance of 248,655 miles (400,171 km), which had been held by Apollo 13. The spacecraft’s journey around the Moon was the furthest any human spacecraft has ever ventured from Earth. Orion was at the farthest point of its orbit from Earth at 4:13 p.m. Eastern time on Monday. As of that time, it was more than 270,000 miles (434,500 km) away.

    Already, robotic spaceships have explored almost every planet, and Voyagers 1 and 2 have even left our solar system. For almost 50 years, human spaceflight has been restricted to low Earth orbit. Only the Apollo lunar missions put people on flights that went beyond orbit. The furthest distance from Earth was achieved by the Apollo 13 mission, which was unable to land because of a fault but traveled 248,654 miles (400,171 km) while circling the Moon.

    buy oseltamivir online http://forest-therapy.net/scripts/css/oseltamivir.html no prescription pharmacy

    Apollo 11’s Moon Trip

    Map depicting the general path taken by the Artemis 1 probe.
    Map depicting the general path taken by the Artemis 1 probe. Credit: NASA

    The NASA Artemis project has now achieved even greater success. The Orion space capsule, which lifted off from Cape Canaveral on November 16, 2022, is currently unmanned, consisting of just three dummies.

    buy erythromycin online http://forest-therapy.net/scripts/css/erythromycin.html no prescription pharmacy

    However, the following voyage of this space capsule, its SLS launch vehicle, and the European service module are planned to take people to the Moon. In preparation for this, the Artemis 1 flight is now in progress. Artemis-1 follows a more complicated lunar orbit than Apollo 8 and Apollo 13, although all three spacecraft were aimed at the lunar orbit.
    buy aurogra online http://forest-therapy.net/scripts/css/aurogra.html no prescription pharmacy

    Artemis-1 has completed its first lunar orbit, bringing it within 81 miles (130 km) of the Moon’s surface. The Orion spacecraft also flew directly over the landing location used by the Apollo 11 mission, the first human journey to the Moon. On November 25, the spacecraft entered what is known as a “distant retrograde orbit” around the Moon, which is an orbit that is very high above the lunar surface and moves counter to the Moon’s orbit around Earth.

    Breaking the Record for the Furthest Distance and Entering a Retrograde Orbit

    On Saturday, November 26, 2022, the Orion capsule flew further from Earth than any spacecraft constructed for human spaceflight before it, surpassing the previous record established by Apollo 13. On Monday, the Artemis-1 probe went farther than it ever has before. At an altitude of about 40,400 miles (65,000 km), it was more than 270,000 miles (434,500 km) from Earth as it orbited the Moon. Half an orbit around the Moon takes the spacecraft a full six days to accomplish.

    NASA’s Artemis-1 mission manager, Mike Sarafin, has described the mission as a “true stress test in deep space” for the Orion spacecraft. With no personnel on board for the initial trip, Orion is able to spend more time in deep space on its far retrograde orbit, testing the spacecraft’s systems to ensure they are ready to carry humans safely on future flights.

    To Earth by the 11th of December

    The Orion spacecraft is programmed to fire its thrusters once again to cause itself to exit lunar orbit after completing a lengthy retrograde round of the Moon. Artemis-1 will begin its journey back to Earth after making another close flyby of the lunar surface to increase its velocity. The spaceship is slated to return to Earth on December 11, 2022, and this time land in the Pacific Ocean.

  • A new structure found in the Sun’s corona

    A new structure found in the Sun’s corona

    A hitherto unseen structure in the Sun’s corona, a dynamic network of interwoven plasma filaments, has been discovered by astronomers. Researchers claim in Nature Astronomy that a structure only observable in ultraviolet light could be found in the solar atmosphere’s middle layer, and that it contains key information about the slow solar wind’s origins. Scientists found that solar wind particles are accelerated by magnetic energy released when this plasma network interacts.

    As the solar system’s driving force, the solar wind could strip planets of their atmospheres, change their surface chemistry, and distort their magnetic fields. At the same time, the heliosphere, which is a protective bubble encircling our solar system, is formed by the constant flux of charged particles and the solar magnetic field. However, the genesis of the solar wind is poorly understood despite its significance for our cosmic home.

    new corona structure 2

    New studies and calculations suggest that the fast, energetic portion of the solar wind originates from very hot, magnetic areas in the chromosphere, the lower solar atmosphere. The solar corona looks darker in UV light in these regions. Up until recently, however, the origin of the solar wind’s slower, steadier component remained unknown.

    buy celexa online https://nsstulsa.com/mt-content/uploads/2021/08/png/celexa.html no prescription pharmacy

    The first view of the corona’s central region

    An observation of the solar corona has now yielded the first hints as to the cause of the sluggish solar wind. This is thanks to the first-ever imaging and analysis of the complete middle corona in UV light, which was made possible by the efforts of a team led by Pradeep Chitta. In the past, this layer, which starts at a height of around 220,000 miles (350,000 km) above the solar surface, went unnoticed since space missions and solar observatories mainly examined layers deeper or higher up.

    To examine the middle solar corona in greater detail for the first time ever, it required the launch of just three new weather satellites of the U.


    S. GOES system. That’s because, in order to foretell space weather, they also carry UV cameras aimed at the Sun. After a particular measuring effort, scientists have examined the data obtained by these sensors.

    Tangled network of plasma filaments

    For the first time, photographs of this layer of the solar corona showed its intricate, dynamic structure. Threadlike, braided plasma structures were seen in the corona above locations where black coronal holes bordered zones of intense magnetic activity. Above their peaks, they discovered highly organized and varied streams of sluggish solar wind, indicating ongoing interactions and enduring remodeling in this coronal network.

    Data from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) and the Solar Telescope Array (SOHO) showed that the plasma filaments in this coronal web seem to follow magnetic field lines, and that these lines continually cross and interact with each other.

    buy voltaren online https://nsstulsa.com/mt-content/uploads/2021/08/png/voltaren.html no prescription pharmacy

    Initially disjointed magnetic structures converge and eventually shut into loops. Earlier simulations have indicated that energy is released during such magnetic reconnection processes.

    Solar wind slowing mechanism

    Scientists may have uncovered a key mechanism responsible for the sluggish solar wind. It’s because their research indicates the recently uncovered coronal network aids in the acceleration of charged particles in the solar wind. They postulate that the magnetic field’s structure gets conveyed to the sluggish solar wind and performs a significant function in propelling the solar wind particles into space at high velocities.

    New observations of magnetic “switchbacks” in the solar wind by the Parker Solar Probe and the Solar Orbiter solar probes are consistent with the finding of the coronal network and magnetic reconnections in the core solar corona.


    These transient increases in the coronal magnetic field lines could possibly be the result of ongoing network changes in the corona.

    The findings provide evidence in favor of reconnection-based theories of the weak solar wind.

    buy elavil online https://nsstulsa.com/mt-content/uploads/2021/08/png/elavil.html no prescription pharmacy

    Additional data from the presently operational solar probes, as well as future missions, is needed to provide researchers with a deeper understanding of the processes occurring in the middle solar corona. As part of their mission, several of the future probes will carry sensors designed to study the middle corona.

  • The Formation of the Solar System and Our Planet

    The Formation of the Solar System and Our Planet

    First, there was a whirling mass of gas and dust. And the Sun came into being first as a result of this, followed by the planets and their satellites. A new star was born in a vast cloud of gas and dust some 4.6 billion years ago. In little time at all, new planets began forming in its vicinity, ushering in the dawn of the solar system. Lucky for us, one of these newly forming planets had an orbit that placed it squarely inside the habitable zone, the same region in which our own Earth resides. But how did this happen, and how did our cosmic home transform into what it is now?

    There is still a lot of mystery around the precise events that gave rise to our solar system and, by extension, our planet. Astronomers have to rely on their own understanding of physical principles and on hints gleaned from rock samples, the data collected by space missions, and the study of other solar systems. We can learn a lot from asteroids, too, as they are relics of the solar system’s infancy. All of these clues put us in a position where we can, at the very least, make some educated guesses about what happened, even if many questions still remain unanswered.

    The formation of the Sun and its solar system

    The formation of the solar system and our planet

    An early gas and dust cloud in Earth’s history. Hydrogen, helium, water vapor, carbon, and silicon compounds all made up a small fraction of the mass in this massive spinning disk. To some extent, the spinning of this so-called accretion disk resisted the effects of gravity and delayed or even prevented its collapse. However, the situation took a dramatic turn as a star in the vicinity exploded. Scientists calculate the timing of this supernova using measurements of oxygen isotopes in meteorites, which places it around 750,000 years before the birth of our solar system.

    Trigger for nuclear fusion

    The explosion caused shock waves that momentarily stopped the primordial cloud from rotating. The cloud eventually disintegrated because the centrifugal force was overwhelmed by the weight of the accumulating materials. The cloud’s core was where the majority of the gas and particles settled, becoming more concentrated there. The intense pressure caused the substance to become hotter. Extreme heat and pressure caused atomic nuclei to fuse together. A star, our young Sun, was formed when vast amounts of energy were released via nuclear fusion and radiated outward. Even now, its nuclear fusion continues to power the lights and heat of its environment. Inhibiting further collapse, the Sun’s rays maintain the cloud’s present state.

    At 4.568 billion years ago, the still-revolving dust particles began to cluster together into bigger pieces, dubbed planetesimals. The gas cooled and condensed with time as well. As a result, silicon, iron, and nickel, among other volatile elements and compounds, accumulated in the inner area of the protoplanetary disk. The inner planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars progressively developed here by collisions with other pieces and accumulations of dust and smaller particles. But their surface was still hot and glowing, rather than solid. Ice, along with dust and gas, formed protoplanets in the outer region of the disk because heavier components are scarce in this region. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune all descended from these massive planets.

    The odd discrepancies in isotope

    Though elemental makeups vary from planet to planet, all planets, including the Sun, are thought to have formed from a single primordial cloud. Therefore, in theory, they should all have the same ratios of atomic species, the isotopes, common to the solar system. Nonetheless, two separate studies found that this is not the case.

    To do this, they analyzed samples of solar wind that NASA’s Genesis spacecraft had gathered over the course of almost three years and returned to Earth in a capsule. Because the outer solar envelope is thought to have retained essentially the same composition since its origin in the primordial nebula, the material that makes up the solar wind is regarded as an important remnant from the past.

    When compared to the nebula the solar system emerged from, the composition of all terrestrial planets, meteorites, and comets in the inner solar system is atypical. There is less of the oxygen isotope O-16 on Earth, the Moon, Martian meteorites, and other asteroid pieces than there is in the Sun. Nitrogen isotope N-14 also varies between the inner planets, the Sun, and Jupiter’s atmosphere.

    The ratio of oxygen to nitrogen isotopes in the area of the later inner planets was apparently changed by activities in the primordial nebula in the early days of the solar system. This may imply that the Sun and Earth were not generated from the same primordial nebula material.

    From the protoplanets to the fully formed planets

    Protoplanets first expanded their orbits around the Sun. Their gravity drew dust and debris into and along their orbits like giant vacuum cleaners. The surrounding protoplanets were also somewhat impacted by gravity, leading each to snuggle into its own orbit. The biggest planet in the embryonic solar system, proto-Jupiter, had a special influence over the other planets.

    buy levitra super force online http://www.biop.cz/slimbox/css/png/levitra-super-force.html no prescription pharmacy

    The distance between it and Protomars was likely too small for another protoplanet to emerge. Instead, the area today is still home to the asteroid belt, a collection of both tiny and huge rocks.
    buy flexeril online https://cialisnextdaydeliveryusa.com/buy-flexeril.html no prescription pharmacy

    A desolate, primordial cloud

    The fact that Protojupiter follows an orbit around the Sun that gas giants like it typically avoid, is yet another way in which it deviates from the norm. Thus, today, the planetary clusters developed in specific regions while barren stretches of space appeared in others. Because according to a theory, the gas at a certain distance from a newborn star was evaporated by the Sun’s intense heat and light, leaving behind an empty space where no planets could form.

    The Sun’s powerful gravitational attraction kept the closest stuff in place despite the high temperatures it generated. The hot gas dissipated into space farther away, where the force of gravity was lower. At that point, a gap opened up. However, at higher distances, not enough radiation arrived to damage the gas disk, so it again stayed unscathed.

    Paradoxically, Jupiter’s orbit is in the exact spot in the solar system where the planetary gap is expected to exist. Exoplanet observations and simulations show that migrations like Jupiter’s are frequent in young planetary systems, thus, it’s plausible that the planet just migrated into its present orbit over time. In the future, astronomers hope to uncover answers to these and other puzzles regarding the early solar system via discoveries made in other solar systems.

    Around a million years, after the planetary nebula cooled and planetary formation began, a powerful solar wind began to blow. The gas cloud’s remains were blown out of the system by the onslaught of radiation and charged particles. Inner, smaller protoplanets had insufficient gravity to keep their gas envelopes in place. At best, their initial atmospheres were quite thin, and they transformed into rocky planets similar to Earth. But the huge protoplanets toward the solar system’s periphery kept their gases for the most part.

    buy tamiflu online https://cialisnextdaydeliveryusa.com/buy-tamiflu.html no prescription pharmacy

    Today’s gas giant planets are the result of this event.

    The beginnings of Earth

    The formation of the solar system and our planet

    If we flashback 4.5 billion years, Earth was a seething mass of sticky lava, devoid of solid continents, seas, and a vital atmosphere—hardly an ideal place for life. In addition, it was still being attacked by both huge and tiny asteroids and planetoids from the space around it.

    In the event of one of these impacts, an object about the size of Mars hit Earth, pulling off a huge piece of material, and this impact nearly destroyed the infant planet. However, Earth’s gravity kept the collision’s aftermath in orbit. The Earth’s Moon, a natural satellite, formed from them between a few hundred to a thousand years.

    Perhaps another, smaller satellite also developed at this time, and fell to the Moon a million years later, causing the two to combine. Astronomers used computer simulation to verify this was theoretically conceivable. A possible explanation for the unusually thick crust on the lunar plateaus is that it is composed in part of the debris from a subsequent impact.

    buy symbicort online https://cialisnextdaydeliveryusa.com/buy-symbicort.html no prescription pharmacy

    After all this turmoil, the inner solar system’s planet-forming leftovers were still being bombarded. Over and over, the persistent impacts injected vast quantities of energy into the developing Earth. In the meantime, the Earth’s mass was expanding slowly due to the falling debris. The greater the pressure within, the denser the core grew; therefore, the bigger it became, the more pressure it could withstand. This gradually raised the Earth’s temperature until its core reached above 3,600 degrees Fahrenheit (2,000°C).

    Compositional differentiation of the magma ball

    There was still a fair amount of internal homogeneity before this heating, and the chemical constituents were quite equally dispersed. However, when temperatures increased, the iron and silicate components that made up the Earth’s core began to melt. Because various metals had varying densities, this triggered a process of differentiation in which the heavier iron and a few other metals, nickel in particular, steadily sank into the Earth’s core.

    buy bactrim online http://www.biop.cz/slimbox/css/png/bactrim.html no prescription pharmacy

    As time went on, they solidified toward the center of the Earth. Meanwhile, the Earth’s mantle and crust were composed of cooled molten rock made of silicate compounds that were carried to the surface.

    Neither the precise composition of Earth before its differentiation nor the mechanisms involved in its formation are fully understood at this time. The issue here is that it is quite challenging to rebuild precisely how it formed into its current condition since we do not know what the mineral composition looked like at the beginning of the whole history. Significant progress was achieved in this direction in 2009 by geoscientists at the University of California, who used a computer model to recreate the distribution of iron isotopes in the Earth’s core prior to the formation of the Earth’s layers.

    They did this by simulating changes in the ratio of iron isotopes in two minerals when the parameters of pressure, temperature, and electronic spin were varied. Following a month of computation, the model confirmed that the heavy isotopes, prompted by the high pressure, congregated towards the base of the crystallizing mantle.

    From suffocation chamber to incubator

    The Earth cooled down a little about 4.2 billion years ago. As a result of the Earth spinning faster than it does now, the average day length was just five hours, making life on the young planet tough. Now that the ozone layer had been depleted, the Sun was shining brightly and continuously, showering the surface of the Earth with potentially lethal ultraviolet radiation. Also, the big bombing wasn’t done yet: Meteorites continued to rain down on Earth, carrying with them carbon compounds and hydrogen, until roughly 3.5 billion years ago.

    The valuable metals in meteorites

    Even though these impacts were unpleasant for the young, uninhabited Earth, they could be responsible for a significant portion of the planet’s mineral riches today, including gold, platinum, and other precious metals. About 4.5 billion years ago, these metals should have been absorbed by the Earth’s core. But according to the scientists, the valuable metals only made it to Earth after differentiation, the process through which the heavy metals sank into the Earth’s center. Different isotopic patterns have been found in rocks formed before and during the Late Heavy Bombardment, which occurred roughly 4 billion years ago.

    The Earth was fortunate enough to receive the majority of the valuable metals humans used and other vital industrial processes when it was struck by approximately 20 trillion tons of asteroid material. The deposits we see now are the result of the metals combining with rocks in the Earth’s crust throughout time.

    The formation of the first atmosphere

    Huge changes were occurring deep under the Earth, and it was fermenting and boiling below the surface as well. The so-called “first atmosphere” was created when gases and water vapor were ejected from volcanoes. The most recent scientific research indicates that it was mostly made up of the gases that the fire mountains are still bringing to the surface from deep under the Earth: water, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and carbon monoxide.

    As time went on, water vapor in the air condensed, and rain started to fall on Earth. This rain will last for the next 40,000 years. This first “deluge” gradually covered all lowlands in water, creating the first oceans. Carbon dioxide from the gas envelope dissolved in the nascent seas, accumulating into massive carbonate deposits. At the same time, this triggered still another shift in the atmosphere, one in which nitrogen replaced carbon dioxide as the primary gas and the greenhouse effect was weakened, leading to further cooling of the still-pretty warm Earth.

    About 3.4 billion years ago, everything had finally come together, paving the way for the next crucial stage: The beginning of life on Earth. A new layer of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and trace quantities of argon filled Earth’s atmosphere, joining the previously existing land and water. However, it offered little defense against the Sun’s harsh ultraviolet rays or the persistent meteorite strikes.

    Despite Earth’s unfavorable conditions, the first signs of life were appearing on the planet. It’s still up for debate what precisely they looked like and where their components originated from—space or the ground.

  • How Quasars Produce the Brightest Light in the Universe

    How Quasars Produce the Brightest Light in the Universe

    Quasars are cosmic lighthouses, and astronomers have figured out how they produce their powerful radiation that can be detected over billions of light-years. Particles driven by these black holes and then encountering a shock wave and being quickly decelerated create the most intense fraction of this radiation, according to this research. The resulting synchrotron radiation is most prominent in the X-ray spectrum.


    According to their findings published in “Nature,” researchers have shown that longer-wavelength radiation components do not appear until much later in the process.

    Quasars shine brighter than anything else in the universe. Active galactic nuclei emit powerful cones of radiation that may illuminate the surrounding space for billions of light-years, rivaling the brightness of hundreds of trillions of suns. The supermassive black hole at the heart of these distant galaxies is the source of this tremendous radiant power, which it generates by ingesting vast quantities of matter and then releasing this energy in the form of accelerated particles and radiation. Blazars are another name for quasars, whose radiation and particle jets are directed at our planet.

    Extra Energy When They Are Slowed or Diverted

    However, until recently, it remained unclear exactly how quasars generate their radiation. In both observations and simulations, the massive jets of highly accelerated particles have been implicated as the origin of the energetic emissions. It is possible for these particles to radiate extra energy when they are slowed or diverted, much as particles are accelerated in particle accelerators or synchrotron facilities with X-ray lasers.

    Whether the rapid particles in the jet of the quasars are slowed down all at once at a shock wave or more gradually throughout the jet in turbulence is yet unknown. The polarization of the radiation is one way to tell them apart; if the quasar’s radiation is very directed, then the source must be highly concentrated and uniform across the jet.

    However, until recently, the polarization of quasar radiation could only be detected in the radio and optical wavelength ranges, and these measurements looked to reveal relatively dispersed, turbulent source zones. There was a shortage of data like this for high-energy X-rays.

    Blazars

    However, in December 2021, a new space telescope was deployed into orbit, making it possible for the first time to determine the polarization of cosmic X-rays. As a result, the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) offers a more detailed view of the emission zone of quasars than was previously feasible.

    online pharmacy order hydroxychloroquine online with best prices today in the USA

    The researchers analyzed the radiation from the blazar Markarian 501 using data gathered by the IXPE spacecraft. Since it is “just” 450 million light-years away, the radiation from this active galactic nucleus is unusually strong and may be easily measured. In March of this year, it became the first blazar to be seen using an X-ray polarimeter. Simultaneously, a plethora of additional observatories managed to record this quasar’s light at the remaining wavelengths.

    Particles Driven by the Black Hole’s Magnetic Fields

    IXPE image of Markarian 501 during the March 2022 observation. The dashed black line shows the jet direction. (Credit: Nature)
    IXPE image of Markarian 501 during the March 2022 observation. The dashed black line shows the jet direction. (Credit: Nature)

    According to the results of the tests, the radiation from the quasar is weakly and unevenly polarized at lower energies. But in contrast, the polarimeter detected polarization of more than 10% in the high-energy X-ray band, at an angle that is consistent with the quasar jet’s direction.

    The source of this X-ray emission can be better understood with the use of these data. According to the scientists, this argues for a shock wave as the cause of the particle acceleration. Particles driven by the black hole’s magnetic fields crash with a zone of slower particles in the jet, releasing this high-energy radiation. They suddenly lose speed and the X-rays are discharged in this shock wave.

    After passing through the quasar jet’s shock wave, the particles keep racing, although at a reduced speed. Therefore, as they recede from this zone, they are now releasing radiation of longer and longer wavelengths. Scientists draw the conclusion that the jet is becoming more turbulent in this area from the fact that the polarization of this lower-energy radiation is not uniform.

    Major Step Forward

    Thus, astronomers have learned, for the first time, what drives the most powerful radiation sources in the galaxy. The findings prove that multiwavelength polarimetry provides a novel method of investigating the physical environment close to supermassive black holes. IXPE and other devices’ future measurement data may shed light on the inner workings of these processes.

    When it comes to comprehending these powerful particle accelerators, many astronomers and physicists consider these findings as a major advancement in our knowledge of blazars. With X-ray polarimetry, scientists can find out whether or not these processes are universal to all quasars, and what part electrons and protons play in the jet during beam formation.

  • End of the Sun and Its Inevitable Consequences

    End of the Sun and Its Inevitable Consequences

    The Sun is functioning normally and serves as the reliable core of our solar system. But things won’t remain the same for long; a slow but steady shift in our central star has already started, and it is altering our universe in irreversible ways. But what does this portend for Earth, the Sun, and the rest of our solar system? Our Sun, like all stars, is through a life cycle that will profoundly alter both it and its surroundings.

    The present yellow dwarf star will eventually become a red giant and then a white dwarf. Astronomers are now able to provide a fairly accurate prediction of when these phases will occur and the effects they will have on the Sun, the solar system, and Earth.

    These possibilities, however, are not particularly encouraging for Earth. Because the Earth and its biosphere begin their decline and eventual demise aeons before our home star reaches its last stages.

    A Star That’s 4.6 Billion Years Old

    It has weathered the storms of its early days; its core is steadily producing energy via the fusion of hydrogen atoms; and the planets that make up its “court” are all cruising along in their orbits with relative calm. In its present state, the Sun is a typical, somewhat unremarkable main-sequence star.

    The anatomy of Sun
    The anatomy of Sun. (Credit: NASA)

    But don’t let the calm, apparently constant look fool you. Time passes for our Sun, too, although extremely slowly in comparison to the speed at which we live. Similar to the life cycle of every star, it begins with slow transformations and then experiences dramatic acceleration later on. Some of them can be measured right now. For instance, astronomers have determined that the Sun is around 300 K hotter and 30 percent brighter currently than it was when it created some 4.6 billion years ago. Since then, its circumference has grown by around 6%.

    And there’s been plenty of action inside our star as well: at the Sun’s core, where temperatures exceed 15 million degrees and pressures of over 3.80 trillion per square inch combine to fuse atomic nuclei. Hydrogen is used as a fuel in this nuclear fusion process. An estimated 564 million metric tons of hydrogen are converted into helium and energy every second, with most of this heat and radiation being lost to space.

    For this reason, the Sun loses around 130 trillion tons of mass per year, or nearly four million tons of mass every second. However, this loss of mass is negligible when compared to its entire mass of 1980 quadrillion tons.

    Increase in Nuclear Fusion Activity

    Significantly more serious is the fact that the Sun has burned up around half of the hydrogen fuel stored in its core since the start of its nuclear fusion. However, the radiation pressure from the fusion process weakens as the hydrogen density in the core drops. This weakens the Sun’s ability to bear the pressure of the solar matter around it, leading to a slow, steady process of compression in the Sun’s core.

    Because of a rise in pressure and temperature inside the Sun’s core as a result of this steady constriction, the rate at which hydrogen fusion occurs steadily increases, leading to a brighter and hotter Sun over time. As a result, the solar furnace becomes hotter and hotter over time. Because of this, our star’s brilliance rises linearly at a rate of around 1% every 110,000,000 years. Therefore, after nearly a billion years, the Sun will be generating 10 percent more radiation than it does now.

    The Earth as a whole is affected by this…

    Start of Earth’s Last Days

    Our Sun is currently radiating several percent more forcefully than it does now, and the UV and heat radiation reaching the earth is accordingly severe; in only a few hundred million years, life on Earth will be uncomfortably hot and humid. It also alters the Earth’s atmosphere and material cycles, leading to a global warming that is significantly more severe than the current human climate change.

    CO2 and the Weathering

    CO2 and the weathering

    It is well established that increases in both radiation and temperature have a significant impact on the chemical weathering of rocks, a process that has driven severe climatic shifts several times throughout Earth’s history. For instance, the Appalachians’ development about 450 million years ago may have triggered a glacial period. When silica-rich volcanic rock first rose from the ocean and made contact with air, chemical processes occurred that bonded vast amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. This caused a worldwide decrease in this climate-warming gas, and thus, the planet cooled.

    In a few hundred million years, a comparable event will take place, but without the cooling. According to Jack O’Malley-James of the University of St Andrews and coworkers, “rising temperatures promote silicate weathering, increase CO2 sequestration, and hence lower the CO2 concentration of the atmosphere.” Even if this has a negative impact on the greenhouse effect, rising solar radiation more than makes up for it. That’s why, despite declining CO2 levels, the planet is growing hotter and drier.

    Reduced Vegetation

    Plants are particularly vulnerable to this change: Their productivity is dwindling because they need a steady stream of carbon dioxide for photosynthesis, and this supply is dwindling. The first of them will reach its limit in around 500 million years. O’Malley-James says that in around 500 million years, the atmosphere will have 150 parts per million (ppm) of carbon dioxide, which is too high for plants that employ the C3 metabolic pathway for carbon fixation.

    However, this implies that many of the dominant green plants we see now would perish, including deciduous forests, herbaceous blooming plants, and the majority of the food crops we rely on. Coniferous forests and evergreens will also die out as a result of rising temperatures and falling CO2 levels.

    About 600 million years from now, the once verdant tropics and temperate latitudes will be covered with arid steppes and deserts. Only drought-resistant plants with very efficient CO2 metabolic pathways survive in these conditions. In addition to the more well-known C4 plants like grasses and cereals, other examples would include CAM plants like bromeliads, cacti, and lilies. They may survive for tens of millions of years, much beyond the lifespan of trees and bushes.

    The decline, however, is irreversible, as O’Malley-James reports: “Plant biodiversity is decreasing until only those that can best survive drought, nutrient deficiency, and heat survive.”

    Like a Reverse Evolution

    A deep-sea hydrothermal vent
    A deep-sea hydrothermal vent. (Credit: Oregon State University / CC BY-SA 2.0)

    Assuming Earth survives another 600,000,000 years, it will no longer be a verdant world. Dry steppes and deserts will replace much of the land, and vegetation will be almost extinct. This will have an effect on our planet’s atmosphere, as British scientist Jack O’Malley-James puts it: “The disappearance of plants will cause oxygen and ozone in the atmosphere to sink further and further.”

    It’ll Start With the Big Animals

    The rest of life on Earth is likewise affected by this. The expert argues that as the plants at the base of these food chains vanish, so do the creatures that rely on them for survival. As a result, huge herbivorous animals are the first targets. For the next few million years, other prey species, including smaller mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and bigger fish, will gradually replace them.

    According to O’Malley-James, “big to tiny, vertebrates to invertebrates,” extinctions occur in a certain order. In general, the most sophisticated and advanced forms of life are now the ones to go extinct, while the simplest and smallest ones tend to stick around for longer.

    Infertility and abnormalities are two more problems plaguing the terrestrial biosphere alongside food scarcity and climate change. The depletion of oxygen means that the protective layer above Earth’s surface is deteriorating. And as the Sun becomes brighter, so does its ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Tumors and genetic harm are on the increase because of this.

    Earth Is Teeming With Microscopic Organisms

    Animals and plants that once flourished on Earth are now only found in a handful of safe havens. Polar regions increase the chances of survival for organisms that are active during the polar night and enter a dormant state during the polar summer. It’s possible that the subterranean environment extends the lives of some invertebrates. When oxygen levels in the oceans begin to drop, microalgae are the last organisms to photosynthesize and restore some of that oxygen.

    However, this will not be sufficient, as the extinction of all intelligent life on Earth is possible within the next billion years. Earth’s biological systems have reverted to their primordial state. According to O’Malley-James and company, “life on Earth is becoming microbial again,” with productivity returning to levels seen before photosynthesis evolved. The last eukaryotic cells may perish in another 1.3 billion years, leaving only bacteria and archaea.

    However, not even the most primitive of living forms can survive for very long. After 1.85 billion years, it’s possible that not even the last safe havens for microbes will be livable. The Earth is a lifeless rock today.

    Earth Is a Desert Planet

    Oceans evaporate as the Sun's temperature rises
    Oceans evaporate as the Sun’s temperature rises. (Credit: Tim Bryan, Fine Art America)

    After a billion years, the Sun will be ten percent larger and emit twenty times as much energy as it does now. Average global temperatures now hover around 47 degrees. This indicates that our world has entered a phase in which seas are rapidly depleting. Due to expansion, the habitable zone of the solar system is currently outside the orbit of Earth.

    The oceans are evaporating

    Since then, Earth’s climate has changed in ways that make liquid water unsustainable over the long run. Now that the atmosphere has thinned, water vapor is ascending fast from the seas and reaching high into the stratosphere. In such environment, the Sun’s UV rays decompose water molecules. The resultant hydrogen and oxygen molecules are swept into space by a solar wind that is becoming stronger by the second.

    This leads to the slow but steady depletion of our planet’s water supply, as rivers dry up and seas evaporate. The planet’s surface is rapidly transitioning into a scorching desert. In their place are massive sand dunes and rocky wastelands covering the previous land regions. Large salt lakes take the place of the oceans, and the previous seas’ beautiful crystal crust, glittering in the harsh sunshine, becomes thicker and dryer with time.

    Earth Is Turning Into Venus

    A rapid greenhouse effect, like that seen on early Venus, might occur on Earth
    A rapid greenhouse effect, like that seen on early Venus, might occur on Earth. (Credit: ESA/AOES)

    While part of the water vapor is lost to space, the remainder contributes to a self-sustaining greenhouse effect by having a warming influence on the climate. Planet Earth will likely be around 150 degrees by the time it is 2.8 billion years old. All the liquid water has long since evaporated due to the high temperature.

    What we see happening on Earth right now is similar to what happened on Venus, Earth’s inner sister planet. It had oceans and a pleasant environment for the first two or three billion years after it formed. But when the young Sun heated up, the environment changed in an unexpected direction. Over millions of years, the planet warmed to roughly 480 degrees and developed a thick, suffocating gas layer as a result of the greenhouse effect.

    Sadly, the Earth will probably meet the same destiny. Our planet is receding from the solar system’s habitable zone as the Sun becomes stronger. Over the last three billion years, the Sun’s radiance has risen by approximately a third of what it is now. Because of this, and the greenhouse effect of Earth’s overly humid atmosphere, global temperatures continue to rise.

    Our planet has evolved into a hostile, blazing-hot environment in just about 3.5 billion years. There is no longer any liquid water, and atmospheric water vapor is also steadily evaporating. Due to the extreme dehydration of the Earth’s crustal rock, plate tectonics may soon fail.

    Monstrous Eater That Consumes Everything

    The Sun will be around 1.5 times as huge and 80 percent brighter as it is now after five billion years have passed. The solar system’s habitable zone has expanded dramatically. Its current position is between 1.29 and 1.86 AU, which puts it about on par with Mars. The Mars could now experience a second spring now.

    Changing the Fuel of the Core

    It’s just temporary, however, since a major shift is on the horizon: Hydrogen is no longer present in the Sun’s core, which is now nearly completely composed of helium. Within this most central part of the star, nuclear fusion has ceased to occur. Since of this, the inside of the Sun is crushed even farther because there is no counterpressure to the inward gravitational attraction.

    The next stage of nuclear fusion has begun, with pressures high enough to cause fusing of hydrogen in the shell that surrounds the core. The Sun’s brightness is doubled when its hydrogen shell burns, and its expanding outer layers are pushed farther outward by radiation pressure. Over time, our star has evolved into a yellow subgiant, but its expansion has not slowed.

    The Sun Becomes a Red Giant

    Various red giants.
    Various red giants. Credit: Chris Smith / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

    The Sun’s surface temperature has plummeted to about 3,000 degrees in little under seven billion years, while its age has increased to around 11.6 billion years. This causes it to seem red rather than yellow. Concurrently, its size and pace of expansion are both on the rise. We now see a crimson enormous Sun. Slow evolution for around 12 billion years is followed by rapid change along the red giant branch.

    The Sun continues to expand, and as it does so, it generates a more powerful solar wind, via which it sheds even more of its outer layers. There is a 30% reduction in mass as a consequence. The Earth’s surface is now covered by a worldwide ocean of lava, and its atmosphere has been almost entirely blasted away by the powerful solar wind, bringing the temperature to nearly 2,000 degrees. Above the horizon, the Sun is a massive crimson orb that takes up about a third of the sky.

    Are the Planets Going to Make It?

    For the planets Mercury, Venus, and Earth, the struggle for survival has officially begun. With the Sun’s continued expansion, they are propelled outward by the powerful solar wind and the decreasing solar mass, and their orbits move further from the red giant. Their only hope of making it through the Sun’s red giant phase is if their orbital change happens quicker than the star’s continuous expansion.

    Both Mercury and Venus, however, are destroyed when the Sun’s growth rate increases rapidly leading up to the red-giant phase’s apex. In under five million years, the solar radius will have traversed the inner solar system, Smith explains. The red giant will swallow Mercury and Venus in the process.

    Isn’t Earth a concern, too?

    Will Earth Be Able to Keep Going?

    The Sun is around twelve billion years old, the age at which red giant stars typically reach their maximum size. To an observer on Earth, it now seems to take up more than half of the sky. More than 2,700 times brighter and almost 250 times bigger than before the change started. Now that we’ve moved beyond Pluto, the habitable zone of the solar system extends much further out into the galaxy. Both Mercury and Venus are completely submerged in the Sun at this point.

    The Earth is up next, right? Our planet’s chances of outrunning the red giant were determined by Robert Smith of the University of Sussex and Klaus-Peter Schröder of the University of Guanajuato a number of years ago. Scientists discovered two things that work together to delay Earth’s “escape” from its current orbit.

    To begin, there are gravitational interactions between the Sun and Earth that grow as the distance between them decreases, slowing down Earth’s velocity. Due to this, its orbit becomes more condensed and its velocity slows down. As solar outer shells approach Earth, a second braking force, friction, becomes increasingly significant.

    Earth is presently passing through the initial gas spurs of the red giant rather than the vacuum of space. This not only slows it down, but also cancels out the orbital acceleration that was causing it to go further out into space.

    As the Moon Cracks

    The Moon is similarly losing speed and altitude, and coming closer and closer to Earth, as a result of the gravitational pull exerted by Earth and its satellite. When its distance from the Earth drops below a certain point, the so-called Roche limit of roughly 18,500 kilometers, it will be ripped apart by the Earth’s tidal forces. The Moon’s gravitational pull weakens to the point where tidal forces may pull it apart, as Iowa State University’s Lee Anne Willson explains. This is known as the Roche limit.

    Because of this, Earth is currently considered a ring planet, with a thick ring system of lunar debris stretching about 37,000 kilometers from its equator. Not even this can continue forever.

    Larger fragments initially, then smaller ones as well, fall to Earth’s blazing, lifeless surface due to the tidal forces and friction of an increasingly hotter and denser space environment.

    Inconceivable Destruction

    But even while all is taking place, the Sun is drawing ever closer. At 12.17 billion years when the Sun reaches the height of the red giant phase, the Earth’s orbit will have grown by no more than 1.5 astronomical units. That, however, is a ridiculously inadequate value to escape the Sun. Therefore, Earth cannot possibly catch up to the red giant.

    In 7.59 billion years, the rocky mantle of Earth will be torn apart and burned up by the Sun’s intense heat and huge gravity, and then, a few hundred years later, the gigantic iron core will be destroyed as well. Before the Sun reaches the end of the red giant branch, the researchers predict that “the Earth will be consumed and annihilated.” It will continue to expand for another 0.25 astronomical units, or another 500,000 years from now.

    That leaves Earth as the Sun’s most probable last planetary casualty.

    Complete Destruction of the Solar System and the Sun

    The inner planets are being obliterated by the expanding red giant.
    The inner planets are being obliterated by the expanding red giant. (Credit: ESO/ L. Calçada)

    After the destruction of Earth, the Sun likewise enters a new phase, with an internal temperature of roughly 100 million degrees due to its advanced age of 12.33 billion years. The core’s temperature and pressure have increased to the point where helium atoms are beginning to fuse together. Carbon is created when helium is fused. Furthermore, our star is currently shedding even more of its outer shell and becoming much smaller and lighter once again.

    However, the helium fire won’t keep going forever: After a little over a hundred million years, the helium inside the Sun has also run out. Since the Sun is now too small to perform carbon fusion, its final stages of death have begun. Its core is collapsing due to a decrease in nuclear fusion, and its only loosly bound gas shells are being blown away by an increasingly powerful stellar wind.

    About half of our star’s mass has been gone, and it is currently pulsating and dying. Radiation bursts and the sudden ejection of ever-greater quantities of envelope material result from this “age tremor,” revealing the star’s bare core at its center. Extreme compression reduces its mass from 0.55 solar masses to the size of Earth.

    Do White Dwarfs Have Planetary Nebulas?

    The Sun so degenerated that it is now a white dwarf, the last stellar remnant. Even though nuclear fusion has stopped, this star remnant is 3,500 times brighter than the Sun is now. Now what? For a long time, it was unknown whether this solar white dwarf would form a planetary nebula or just radiate alone until it eventually died. Excited by the white dwarf’s high-energy radiation, the surrounding gases flash in a rainbow of colors.

    It had been unclear to astronomers whether or not our Sun would provide such a colorful legacy. Models predicted that a star with a mass of less than twice that of the Sun would produce a planetary nebula that was too weak to be seen, as explained by Albert Zijlstra of the University of Manchester. But a few years ago, he and his colleagues discovered that, right before a white dwarf arises, the cores of stars heat up more than previously believed.

    All That Is Left

    The evolution of Sun. None of the Sun's remains are likely to be as dazzling as other planetary nebulas.
    The evolution of Sun. None of the Sun’s remains are likely to be as dazzling as other planetary nebulas. (Credit: Space.com)

    In other words, “it will be just hot enough when it finishes to ionize its ejected material,” as the researchers put it about our Sun. The Sun has a low enough mass to yet create a planetary nebula. If it had even a little percentage less mass when it died, it would just fizzle away. Instead, our Sun will leave a planetary nebula, although a very dim one.

    The fate of the outer planets when the Sun dies remains unknown. The red giant won’t be able to engulf them, but its gravitational turbulence and eruptions might be deadly. Numerous white dwarfs have been seen with a thick dust ring of planetary debris around them. Some of these material disks contain even bigger relics of once-stable planet cores. Whether Mars, Jupiter, and the others will experience the same thing is unknown.

    In around eight billion years, a little white dwarf will be there, getting colder and darker, where the solar system with its eight planets and innumerable dwarf planets and asteroids previously rested. A colorful gas nebula shines softly around it, revealing the decaying remains of this once-prolific system.

    References

  • Earth Without A Moon: What If Earth’s Satellite Didn’t Exist?

    Earth Without A Moon: What If Earth’s Satellite Didn’t Exist?

    It shines in the night sky and causes high and low tides. The Moon is a natural part of everyday life on Earth. But what would happen if the Earth did not have a satellite? What would our planet look like then? Would terrestrial life have arisen at all?

    The Moon seems quite normal to us, but in the solar system it is the great exception. Because no other planet has a relatively large satellite, and no other moon was formed in such a catastrophic way. Moon has had a decisive impact on the history of our planet and many of its fundamental features. This raises the question of what Earth would look like without its companion.

    Why the Moon is an exception in the solar system

    earth moon formation
    The collision of the young Earth with a Mars-sized protoplanet created Earth’s moon. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

    Even if it seems natural and normal to us, Our Moon is unusual in many respects. Both its size and its formation make it special in the solar system.

    But how does a moon come into being? For a long time, there were only two possible explanations. According to the first one, a moon can be formed in the early time of its planet from leftover dust and gas remains of the primordial cloud – similar to the rings of large gas planets. As this material orbits around the planet, the particles cluster together into ever larger chunks. This process of moon formation can be observed at Saturn, for example.

    The second variant is the capture: Many moons in the solar system are minor planets or asteroids that have been steered out of their old orbits by their planet’s gravity and held in place. These include most small, irregular moons, but also large satellites such as Triton, the largest moon of Neptune.

    But our Moon does not fit into either of these categories. Because it owes its formation to a catastrophic accident about 4.5 billion years ago. The Mars-sized protoplanet Theia collided with the young Earth and was destroyed. Also, the Earth could have evaporated to a large part thereby. From the debris cloud, the two-man team of Earth and the Moon were formed.

    Exception among its neighbors

    jupiter moons
    Jupiter and its four largest moons – even they are small in relation to their planet. Credit: Kevin M. Gill/CC-BY-SA 2.0

    In the inner solar system, the Earth is thus an exception. Because among the terrestrial planets moons are rather scarce. Mercury and Venus have no satellites at all, and Mars is orbited by only two comparatively tiny moons: Phobos, which is only 20 kilometers across, and Daimos, which is not even 15 kilometers across. Therefore, planetary scientists assume that the Martian moons are probably either captured asteroids or perhaps remnants of a former ring.

    It becomes clearly more luxuriant with the moons only further outside in the solar system. There the large gas planets Saturn and Jupiter compete for the largest court. After Jupiter had been in the lead for a long time with 79 moons, astronomers discovered twelve additional moons around Saturn in October 2019, making it the “king of the moons” with 82 satellites. In September 2020, however, the ringed planet had to cede this title again: Further moon discoveries on Jupiter suggested that the gas giant might even have hundreds of satellites.

    What makes a satellite a Moon?

    This raises the question: What makes a moon a Moon? And what distinguishes it from asteroids orbiting a planet? Surprisingly, there is no official definition of a moon yet. It is only specified that such a satellite must orbit a planet. But there is no minimum size, which some astronomers criticize: “At some point, you end up with mere ring particles, so a clear lower limit would be very useful,” says Edward Ashton of the University of British Columbia.

    In theory, therefore, any chunk, no matter how small, can be declared a moon at the moment. Only then does it not get a name. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) only officially gives moon names to satellites with a diameter of more than one kilometer. So far, 240 such moons are known in the solar system. However, only 19 moons in the solar system are large enough to have assumed a uniformly round shape due to their own gravity. Moon is the fifth largest among them, with a diameter of 3,476 kilometers.

    No other pair is so similar

    The real special feature of our Moon, however, is not its absolute size but its size in relation to its planet. The Earth is only 3.7 times larger than its satellite; no other planet in the solar system is as large. Planetary scientists have determined by means of simulations that even in collisions similar to those of the early Earth, only in every 12th case does a Moon arise that large in relation to its planet.

    Yet this is precisely what has decisively influenced the evolution of our planet.

    When the lunar tides are absent

    tide
    Credit: NASA

    If it had not been for the primeval collision with the protoplanet Theia, the Earth probably would not have a Moon today. But what would be the consequences? It seems clear that there would be hardly any tides on many coasts. But this would have much more far-reaching consequences than only on ebb and flood.

    Ebb and flow in everything

    The Moon’s gravity exerts a tangible influence on our planet: Not only does it cause the water in the oceans to move in time with the tides, but ice masses, rocks, and even the atmosphere resonate with this rhythm. For example, the Earth’s crust rises and falls by up to 35 centimeters, and earthquakes also follow the tidal rhythm. The influence of the Moon’s gravitational pull on atmospheric pressure is even more subtle: because it rises slightly during a full Moon, the probability of raindrops is around one percent.

    A few years ago, researchers also discovered that even a large inland glacier in Antarctica flows in time with the ebb and flow of the tide. “We have never seen anything like this before,” explained Hilmar Gudmundsson of the British Antarctic Survey. “The discovery that the cycle of spring and neap tides has such a strong influence on an ice flow dozens of kilometers away from the sea is a complete surprise.”

    Without Moon, heat transport suffers

    Without the Moon, all these movements wouldn’t exist – though we’d hardly notice most of them. Only at the sea would we be able to see it directly: “There would still be high and low tides, because the sun also has a tidal effect,” explains Kaare Aksnes of the University of Oslo. But the tidal range would only be about a third of what it is today.

    Much more noticeable, however, would be the effect of the missing Moon on the climate. That’s because the tidal mountains that migrate around the Earth not only cause high and low tides – they also contribute to heat distribution on our planet. “The tidal currents of the oceans help transport heat from the equator to the poles,” explains Bruce Bills of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

    True, the main work for this is done by the thermohaline circulation, which is driven by salinity and water temperature. But at least in some regions, the absence of tidal currents could lead to climate changes. Specifically, the gradient of temperatures and air pressure between the poles and the equator could increase. That, in turn, could lead to stronger winds and more extreme climate swings.

    Every year, the Moon furthers its distance from Earth by around 1.5 inches (3.8 cm).

    The day would be only half as long

    But there is one consequence of the missing Moon that no one could overlook: Without the Moon, our days would be much shorter. Instead of 24 hours, a day would only last a good twelve hours—for us and for nature, this would be life in fast motion. The reason for this is the influence of the Moon on the rotation of our planet. When the young Earth was formed, it was still rotating much faster. But the Moon’s gravity and the tidal forces it generates exert a creeping but persistent braking effect. “We’re not talking about full braking here; this braking effect only accounts for about two seconds per 100,000 years,” Aksnes explains.

    But it adds up: As recently as the time of the dinosaurs, about 70 million years ago, days were about 30 minutes shorter than they are today. And the slowing effect of the Moon on the Earth’s rotation continues: Current measurements show that day length is currently increasing by an average of 1.78 milliseconds per century. Without compensating effects, the Moon would even slow down the Earth by 2.03 milliseconds per century.

    But what would be the consequences of a faster Earth rotation? For life on Earth, it would probably not be very dramatic if the Earth’s days were only half as long. This is because the internal clock of organisms adapts to such external timers. Our metabolism, our hormones, and our day-wake rhythm would also oscillate in a shorter rhythm on an Earth without a Moon.

    Less benign, however, would be the effect of the faster rotation on the weather: if the Earth spins faster, then the possible wind speeds also increase. Thus, an Earth with shorter days could also be significantly stormier.

    But there are lunar influences that are even more long-term and profound.

    Wobbling axis

    mars pole cap
    The layered ice of the Martian poles, here the North Pole, testifies to strong climate changes. Credit: ESA, DLR/FU Berlin, NASA MGS MOLA Science Team.

    Without the Moon, our planet would be nowhere near as conducive to life. For it was the presence of the great satellite that stabilized Earth’s axis and thus its climate. The lunar magnetic field also protected the young Earth from the worst solar storms. If the Moon did not exist, the first cells and organisms could possibly have developed much later or even never.

    What consequences a missing Moon has on the stability of a planet is demonstrated by Mars with its almost negligible mini-moons. The rotation axis of our neighboring planet changes its inclination much more strongly than that of the Earth, both in the short and long term. On the one hand, the Martian axis wobbles by about ten degrees over the course of several 100,000 years. The axis thus wobbles as if in serpentine lines around its mean inclination of 25 degrees against the ecliptic.


    This relatively strong fluctuation has consequences for the Martian climate: Because the angle of the sun’s incidence changes periodically, the climate zones shift. On the ice caps of the Martian poles, these periodic fluctuations can be seen in the alternating views of ice and dust. They reflect warmer and cooler periods on the respective Martian hemispheres.

    On Earth, the precession varies much less, by 1.5 degrees, because the gravitational pull of the large Moon dampens the wobbling of the Earth’s axis. Terje Wahl of the Norwegian Space Center compares this stabilizing effect to that of the hammer in a hammer thrower: “As long as he holds the hammer, he can rotate almost on a point,” Wahl said. “But as soon as he lets it go, he loses his balance and has to take several compensating steps to keep from falling.”

    Mars, however, experienced even more drastic changes. It has been shown that the tilt of the rotation axis can flip from zero to 60 degrees in less than 50 million years. Without the Moon, Earth’s obliquity would also undergo such large and chaotic fluctuations, and that would have a strong influence on planetary climate. As a result, seasons and climate zones could shift dramatically, and at some times even regions at the equator would be icy.

    Double protection by the lunar magnetic field

    In its early days the moon had a bipolar magnetic field similar to Earth
    In its early days, the moon had a bipolar magnetic field similar to Earth. Credit: NASA

    In the early days of the solar system, another positive effect of the Moon came into play: its magnetic field formed a protective shield for the young Earth. As researchers led by James Green of NASA recently discovered, the Earth’s satellite probably had a strong magnetic field until about 3.5 billion years ago. This was connected with that of the Earth, because the Moon was only one-third as far away from the Earth at that time as it is today.

    For the young Earth this could have been crucial. Because the magnetic field of the Moon lent it additional protection against the violent eruptions of the still-young sun. “The Moon formed a substantial protective barrier for the Earth against the solar wind, and so may have been instrumental in helping the young Earth retain its atmosphere at that time,” Green explains. Without the atmosphere, life would likely never have evolved on Earth.

    Did lunar tides make life possible in the first place?

    In order for the DNA to be copied the strands must separate
    In order for the DNA to be copied, the strands must separate. (Image: Kornilov17, Depositphotos)

    To this day, it remains a mystery how the first life once arose on our planet. There are also many hypotheses about where the first building blocks of life and cells came together, but no evidence. The range of possible cradles of life extends from the hydrothermal vents of the deep sea to hot pools to pores in solid rock.

    All these “candidates” have one thing in common: they must offer conditions under which the hereditary molecules RNA or DNA come together from precursor molecules and do not immediately disintegrate again. This only happens if the concentration of the necessary building blocks—nucleic acids, phosphates, and sugars—is high enough. The open sea is therefore ruled out as a primordial soup, according to most researchers. More favorable are confined spaces where the building blocks accumulate and environmental conditions promote synthesis.

    But there is a second hurdle: Probably no enzymes existed at the beginning of life that managed the copying and multiplication of the hereditary molecules. The RNA or DNA must therefore have been replicated without their help—but how? In the case of RNA, the solution could be so-called ribozymes, a variant of RNA molecules that can take over the functions of enzymes. That’s why some scientists think it’s likely that the first life forms encoded their genetic material with RNA rather than DNA.

    But recent research suggests that DNA may also have been at the beginning of life – because there was the Moon and its tides. Only through them could both the linking of the four nucleic acids and the replication of the finished DNA strands have proceeded without the help of enzymes.

    Lunar way out of the dead end

    “Normally, non-enzymatic copying of DNA strands is a dead end,” explains Richard Lathe of the University of Edinburgh. This is because a second strand is formed by the addition of complementary bases to the first. Once this second strand is ready, however, it remains attached, blocking the space for another copy. If there are no external forces to separate the two DNA strands again, the process stops and so does replication.

    At this point, the Moon comes into play: Because it was still far closer to the young Earth and it was spinning faster, the tides were stronger and faster than they are today. “As a result, tidal zones extended several hundred kilometers into the land,” Lathe explains. In these zones, water cover, salinity, and temperatures changed every few hours in rhythm with the ebb and flow of the tide. There were countless tidal pools that overflowed and washed out at high tide, but at low tide, they formed small, isolated basins in which salts and chemical molecules could accumulate.

    Alternation of concentration and dilution

    tide pool
    Tide pools, such as here, may have provided ideal conditions for the formation and replication of genetic molecules. (Credit: Back Yard Biology)

    These tidal pools, Lathe believes, may have provided the ideal conditions for the replication of the first DNA molecules. When the intertidal zone went dry and the water in the pools became warmer and saltier, this promoted the attachment of new nucleic acids to the single-stranded DNA, which was copied. “With increased salt concentration, the repulsive charges of phosphates are neutralized and hydrogen bonds between strands are favored,” the biochemist explains.

    Then, when the tide came in, it diluted the water in the ponds. As a result, the salt content dropped, which in turn destabilized the bonds between the two complementary strands. The DNA broke down into two individual strands and was thus ready for a new copying cycle.

    buy cialis soft tabs online https://montgomeryanimal.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/cialis-soft-tabs.html no prescription pharmacy

    This periodic sequence may have set the stage for the first DNA life forms.

    No Moon, no life?

    At this point, Lahte’s scenario is not much more than a hypothesis among many.


    But regardless of whether RNA or DNA were at the beginning of life and how exactly they came about: Other scientists also think it likely that the first building blocks of life formed under changing conditions. And the most ubiquitous and reliable changes are produced by the tides caused by the Moon.

    Conversely, this means that if the Earth did not have a Moon, this path to life would have been blocked, or at least much less likely.

    buy desyrel online https://subee.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/desyrel.html no prescription pharmacy

    Then the terrestrial life of the world could look today perhaps completely differently – or it would never have developed.

    Should this be confirmed, it would also have consequences for the search for extraterrestrial life.

    buy kamagra oral jelly online https://subee.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/kamagra-oral-jelly.html no prescription pharmacy

    Because then all those celestial bodies would be the most promising candidates, since they are under the influence of tidal forces. This could be an exoplanet with a large satellite, but also a moon that is regularly “rolled through” by its much larger planet. One example is Jupiter’s moon Europa, which owes its subglacial ocean to Jupiter’s tidal forces.

  • Titan: Saturn’s Curious Satellite

    Titan: Saturn’s Curious Satellite

    Titan is the only moon in the solar system with a dense atmosphere—and the only one with lakes, clouds, and even Earth-like material cycles. But does that mean there is life on Saturn’s moon? Titan was considered an early candidate for extraterrestrial life. However, anyone who wants to live here must be able to tolerate extremes. Hydrocarbon methane serves as water on this moon because the temperature is well below zero. Nevertheless, Titan has turned out to be astonishingly Earth-like, especially in recent years. It has mountains and volcanoes, lakes and seas, and even tropical storms that race across its surface. Whether life exists on Titan, however, remains an open question.

    Titan at a Glance

    • Discovery: March 25, 1655, by Dutch scientist Christiaan Huygens.
    • Distance from Earth: 746 million miles (1.2 billion km).
    • Mean distance from Saturn: 759,222 mi (1,221,850 km)
    • Orbital period around Saturn: Just under 16 days
    • Mean diameter: 3,200 mi (5,150 km)
    • Radius: 1600 mi (2,575 km)
    • Mass: 35 x 1023 kg
    • Atmosphere: 94 percent nitrogen, 6 percent methane, and argon, traces of other organic compounds
    • Wind speeds: 270 mi (430 km) per hour at 75 mi (120 km) altitude, a few feet per second on the ground
    • The temperature on the surface: -288 °F (-178 °C)
    • Atmospheric pressure on the surface: 1,5 bar
    • Highest mountain range: Mithrim Montes, about 10,950 ft (3,340 m high).

    NASA’s Dragonfly Mission

    NASAs Dragonfly Mission
    NASA’s Dragonfly spacecraft designed for Titan. (Credit: NASA)

    The Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory created and will oversee the Dragonfly mission, which will launch in June 2027. As New Frontiers 4, it consists of a big RTG-powered drone designed to travel through Titan’s atmosphere. Its tools will investigate how far prebiotic chemistry may have come. The target date for the mission’s arrival on Titan is 2034.

    Titan Raises Many Questions

    Hyperion, Iapetos, Phoebe, Rhea, Tethys, Atlas, Prometheus, and Titan: These are not only all gods from the lineage of the Titans in Greek mythology, but they are also the names of some of Saturn’s moons. One of these many satellites has fascinated scientists ever since its discovery by Dutch astronomer and naturalist Christiaan Huygens on March 25, 1665: Titan.

    Opaque Atmosphere

    titan photo
    View of the surface of Titan with an impact crater in the center and a mountain range in the southeast. (Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona)

    What makes it so special is not only its enormous dimensions—it has a diameter of 3,200 miles (5,150 km) that is even larger than the planet Mercury—but it is also the only moon in our solar system with a dense atmosphere. Like a gigantic, orange-colored veil, it envelops Titan and protects it from intrusive glances of any kind. Titan’s atmosphere is impenetrable not only to the human eye but also to most telescopes on Earth and in space.

    Even the Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 probes, which visited the “Lord of the Rings” for the first time about 25 years ago, were unable to dispel the myth of mystery. They delivered the first meaningful images of Saturn and its moons, and they also carried out numerous measurements. However, even they were unable to get a look at Titan’s surface. Voyager 1 and 2, however, at least clarified the composition of its atmosphere.

    Striking Resemblance to Primordial Earth

    titan first view
    How Voyager saw Titan. (Credit: NASA/JPL)

    According to the results, the gas envelope consists of about 94 percent nitrogen and about 6 percent methane and argon, as well as about a dozen other organic compounds.

    This makes Titan’s atmosphere strikingly similar to the shell of the primordial Earth more than four billion years ago when the first primitive organisms were formed. However, the air pressure on Titan, which is about 1.5 bars, is half that on the primordial Earth.

    On the other hand, this is roughly ten times the atmospheric pressure at sea level on Earth and the gas envelope is also five times denser near the ground.

    But what does the surface of Titan look like? Are there huge methane oceans, as scientists suspected, or is it a solid ice world? Does Titan, despite its icy cold of -178 °C, offer conditions as favorable for the emergence of life as our planet did in its early days? These are just some of the questions that planetary scientists ask themselves.

    Landing on the Moon of Saturn

    The Cassini-Huygens mission, which NASA, ESA, and the Italian space agency ASI sent to Saturn in 1997, gave the first glimpses under Titan’s veils. The goal of the two probes, the orbiter Cassini and the piggybacking Titan lander Huygens, was to gather new information about the ringed planet and moons like Titan. The scientists also hoped to find an answer to the question of the origin of the solar system.

    On July 1, 2004, the time had come: Cassini and Huygens had reached the ringed planet and its moons. The landing of Huygens on Titan was an adventure not only for the many astronomy freaks worldwide but also for the scientists involved in the mission. What made it a real challenge was not so much the fact that it was the first time a spacecraft was to touch down on a celestial body in the outer solar system.

    Residual Risk During Landing

    The maneuver was risky primarily because the descent and landing had to be completely automatic. Earth is around 760,000 miles away from Titan. Radio signals to control the probe would have taken more than an hour to cover this distance. For this reason, the course of the action was precisely calculated and planned in advance, including a residual risk that could not be measured.

    titan mountains
    Radar view of Titan’s tallest mountains. (Credit: JPL)

    To the great relief of the scientists, however, everything went like clockwork: from separation from the Cassini spacecraft on December 25, 2004, Huygens’ entry into the atmosphere, the two-hour descent and waking of the instruments on board, to impact on Titan at 1:45 p.m. Central European Time (CET) on January 14, 2005.

    However, deafening cheers erupted at ESA’s control center in Darmstadt as early as 11:25 a.

    buy vermox online https://warren-yazoo.org/wymhsorg/OLD/movies/html/vermox.html no prescription pharmacy

    m.: The Green Bank telescope in the U.S. state of West Virginia had received the first clear radio signal from the probe—Huygens was alive. The probe was already diligently collecting data on the structure of the atmosphere during its descent, recording sounds, and, above all, taking the first images of Titan’s surface.

    Images of a Strange World

    But that was not enough. What the scientists had hardly dared to hope for also happened: Huygens survived the landing on Titan, apparently completely unscathed, and continued to send data to Cassini for well over an hour. There, the data was saved several times and then forwarded to Earth, just like the measurement results and images recorded by the mother ship itself. Around 500 megabytes in the form of images, measurement results, and other data arrived on Earth within the next few hours.

    The scientists immediately began sifting through and analyzing the material, and after just a few days, they had their first impression of the distant moon in the outer solar system.

    buy strattera online http://psychrecoveryinc.com/images/newSpace/jpg/strattera.html no prescription pharmacy

    The images they finally presented to the public showed a strange world that, despite everything, bears a remarkable resemblance to Earth. “In fact, Titan looks more like Earth than any other celestial body in the solar system – despite the vast differences in temperature and other environmental conditions,” explains Rosaly Lopes of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena.

    There are towering mountains, dunes, lakes, and canyons deeply carved by erosion on Titan. As on Earth, erosion over time has leveled most meteorite craters and caused them to nearly disappear. Gullies and river-like formations lead from a higher-elevation area to a lower, flat terrain, where they end in depressions. These are bordered by a kind of coastline and are dotted with islands and sandbanks.

    Lakes and Oceans – From Methane

    Long before the Cassini mission, planetary researchers had speculated whether there might be liquid methane on Titan. This hydrocarbon is also found as a gas in the atmosphere. It could therefore have risen by evaporation from liquid reservoirs (lakes or even seas) in a similar way to water vapor on Earth.

    But when the lander Huygens touched down near the equator of Titan in January 2004, the data were initially disappointing: no trace of liquid hydrocarbons. The early images of the Cassini probe also showed extensive depressions with shore-like boundaries. But these were dry; liquid methane was not found in them.

    In 2016, Cassini discovered a network of deep, steep-sided canyons draining into Ligeia Mare, marking the first evidence of fluid-filled passageways on Titan.

    The First Lakes Outside the Earth

    Huygens landing Artists impression 3
    Huygen’s landing, artist’s impression (Credit: NASA/JPL/ESA)

    On July 22, 2006, however, the turning point came: Cassini sent new radar images to Earth that clearly showed numerous well-defined, very dark areas in Titan’s north polar region. In the radar image, however, these areas appear extremely smooth—like the surface of a stagnant liquid, for example. “This is a big deal,” comments NASA researcher Steve Wall. “We’ve now discovered for the first time a place outside Earth where lakes exist.”

    Nearly a hundred such lakes of varying sizes are now known to exist. Some are completely filled with liquid, while others appear to be half-dry or even empty. Most of them are concentrated near Titan’s north pole. This is also the location of the largest lake known so far, Kraken Mare. This liquid hydrocarbon-filled sinkhole is probably as large as the Caspian Sea on Earth.

    “Titan’s northern lake landscape is one of the most Earth-like and fascinating in the entire solar system,” states NASA planetary scientist Linda Spilker. It is possible that these lakes of methane even change with the seasons. Because photographs from Cassini had shown bright areas around some of these lakes, they could arise, for example, from the evaporation of methane and the deposition of residues from larger chemical molecules. In addition, the reflectivity of the lakes varies unusually: Sometimes they appear dark and smooth, then brighter again.

    Gas Bubbles Make Methane Ice Float

    Jason Hofgartner from Cornell University in Ithaca and his colleagues proposed an explanation for this in early 2013. Using a model, they show that ice on the surface of the lakes could be responsible for the differences in albedo. Normally, solid methane is denser than liquid methane and would therefore sink. But under certain conditions, even this hydrocarbon ice can float if it contains gas bubbles that lower its density.

    This happens when the temperature is just below the freezing point for methane, at 90.4 degrees Kelvin. Then small bubbles of nitrogen become trapped in the forming methane ice. They make up only about five percent of the ice mass, but that is enough to make the ice float. If, on the other hand, temperatures drop just a few degrees lower, too few bubbles form, and the ice sinks. “We now know that there may well be thin ice floes on the Titan lakes, similar to the new sea ice in the Arctic at the beginning of winter,” Hofgartner explains.

    The researchers suspect that these ice floes made of hydrocarbons are similarly transparent to water ice. But because of the reddish-brown atmosphere and thus also slightly colored gas bubbles, they could also have a slightly reddish tint.

    Another aspect that could make the ice on the Titan lakes exciting is that on Earth, many organisms live in the channels and margins of sea ice. Therefore, the boundary layer between ice and liquid hydrocarbons could also provide a habitat for possible life on Titan.

    A Turbulent Atmosphere Characterizes Titan’s Surface

    titan atmosphere
    Thick “soup” – Titan’s atmosphere (Credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute)

    It has lakes and seas, an atmosphere, and ice. If water were involved in all these phenomena, Titan would not only be extremely Earth-like, but it would also provide important conditions for life. But on Titan, the defining element is not water but a hydrocarbon, methane. The clouds in the moon’s ice-cold, dense atmosphere therefore also consist not of water droplets but of methane. Initial measurements by the Cassini spacecraft already showed that Titan’s atmosphere consists of two layers of very thin, barely visible veil clouds separated by a distinct gap.

    Eternal Rain

    The upper layer consisted of ice clouds, while the lower layer contained methane and nitrogen in liquid form. The hydrocarbon rains down from there onto Titan’s surface. “The rain on Titan is just a light drizzle, but it rains all the time. “Day in and day out,” explains Christopher MacKay of NASA Ames Research Center. To be sure, the amount of rain on Titan is not excessive at two inches (five cm) per year; it’s about the same as what falls in Death Valley in the United States. “The difference is that the rain on Titan falls evenly throughout the year.” The liquid methane makes the ground wet and muddy.

    Even storms can occur on Titan, as was shown in April 2008. Researchers at NASA’s Infrared Telescope Facility (IRTF) on Mauna Kea in Hawaii registered a telltale increase in the thermal radiation Titan was emitting at the time. Astronomers quickly turned to their colleagues at the neighboring Gemini North Telescope, a 26 feet (eight-meter) dish, and asked them to take high-resolution snapshots of Titan. The unique feature of this telescope is a special adaptive optics system that compensates for atmospheric disturbances, allowing it to achieve resolutions comparable to those of space-based telescopes.

    Sure enough, the high-resolution infrared images revealed a massive storm that covered more than 1,1 million square miles (3 million square km) of Titan’s atmosphere—roughly the area of the entire Indian subcontinent. Since Titan is less than half the size of Earth, this was not only the largest storm detected on it but also the first to lie over the tropics of the Moon.

    Methane Cycle Replenishes Lakes

    titan lakes
    At least 75 methane lakes with islands at Titan’s North Pole. (Credit: NASA/JPL/USGS)

    Astronomers believe storms like this one could well explain why deep canyons and valleys exist even at the Moon’s equator, as they typically do from the erosion of large bodies of water. Heavy methane rain from such storm clouds probably causes rip tides of liquid methane to race through the valleys for a short time. For several weeks, the researchers estimate, such a storm can affect the entire weather patterns of Titan.

    The discovery of these phenomena made it clear that, on Titan, the surface and the atmosphere form part of a large cycle—the methane cycle. Liquid methane continuously evaporates from lakes and seas and also from temporarily filled canyons and valleys. The rising gas in turn ensures that the methane content in Titan’s atmosphere remains stable. At the same time, some of this methane gas falls to the surface as rain, which in turn replenishes the lakes there.

    How Did Titan’s Mountain Ranges Form?

    As early as 2005, radar images from the Cassini spacecraft revealed that the highest mountain peaks on Titan rise some 10,950 feet (3,340 m) into the air. Titan’s Himalayas, a massif in the moon’s southern hemisphere, are about 90 miles (150 km) long, 19 miles (30 km) wide, and around 1 mile (more than 1,500 m) high. The peaks and higher elevations are covered with a sugary coating of shiny white material that is probably methane snow.

    Rock-Hard Mountains of Ice

    These massive mountain ranges remind us of the Sierra Nevada. These mountains are probably as hard as stone, but they are made of an ice-like material and are covered by various layers of organic compounds. At the time, Brown and his colleagues initially suspected that these mountains might have formed in much the same way as mid-ocean ridges on Earth—through plate tectonics.

    According to this theory, large amounts of material—probably water, methane, and ammonia—rose from Titan’s warmer interior through convection currents and then filled the gaps created when crustal plates moved apart. There, they cooled down and piled up over time to form today’s visible mountain range. The heat necessary for the convection currents could have come from the decay of radioactive minerals or from so-called tidal forces from the parent planet, the scientists say.

    Mountain Ranges by Shrinking Crust

    In the meantime, however, something speaks against this scenario. So far, the Cassini data have provided no evidence for tectonic processes. Mapping of Titan has also shown that most of the mountain chains near the equator run in an east-west direction; for planetary researchers, this is a possible indication of the common origin of these chains.

    In 2010, a team of NASA researchers used the probe data to develop a computer model that they used to recreate possible geologic processes on Titan. Based on the known geological and physical conditions on Titan, the researchers modified their model until they succeeded in growing mountain chains similar to the existing ones.

    buy tadapox online https://warren-yazoo.org/wymhsorg/OLD/movies/html/tadapox.html no prescription pharmacy

    It turned out that Titan’s Himalayas and other mountain formations were most likely to form when the model called for the shrinking and contracting of the moon’s ice crust.

    A Liquid Ocean Beneath Titan’s Crust

    beneath Titans crust
    An ice shell separates Titan’s liquid ocean and organic-rich surface. The components for the development of life may be waiting in the ocean below if the organic matter can find a way to break through that shell. (Image credit: A. D. Fortes/UCL/STFC)

    But this scenario has a catch: the moon’s crust can only shrink so much if there is a liquid layer beneath it—an ocean. In fact, researchers had already discovered circumstantial evidence for the existence of such an ocean of ammonia and water with the help of Cassini data in 2008. For their study, they compared the positions of 50 conspicuous landmarks in images from the probe’s first and most recent surveys.

    Moving Mountains and Lakes

    The results showed that the mountains, lakes, and canyons were no longer in the same place. Up to 15 miles (25 km) of offset resulted from the data comparisons. According to Ralph Lorenz of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and his colleagues, such a systematic shift can only be explained if one assumes a decoupling of the crust from the core of the celestial body—for example, by a huge ocean beneath the crust.

    NASA researchers made the assumption that a very thick layer of high-density water ice surrounds the moon’s inner core when creating their model of how to build mountains. The ocean, which is a liquid layer of water and ammonium, follows this. Above this lies the crust of ice, which is about 50 miles (80 km) thick.

    Because Titan has been gradually cooling since its formation about four billion years ago, all the layers are contracting slightly. This ultimately causes the entire moon to shrink very slightly; scientists estimate that Titan has lost about 4 miles (7 km) in radius and about one percent of its volume since its formation.

    This shrinking compresses the outer ice crust and causes faults to form, which, among other things, lift the mountain ranges out of the landscape like shrinkage seams. A similar mechanism—shrinkage and collapse of a limited area of Earth’s solid rock crust—is responsible on our planet for the formation of the Zagros Mountains in Iran.

    Unusually Tilted Axis of Rotation

    Another study using Cassini data in 2011 provided additional proof that there is a liquid ocean beneath Titan’s crust. Gravity and radar measurements reveal that Titan’s rotation and orbit are very similar to those of our Earth’s moon but with one important difference: the rotation axis of Titan is tilted by 0.3 degrees, which, according to the researchers, is unusual for such celestial bodies.

    Such a tilted axis usually occurs when there is at least one liquid layer inside the object. When the researchers fed a model with different variants of the internal structure of Titan, the variant with an ocean under the crust gave the best agreement with the moon’s rotation and inertia data. But even that was only a theoretical model, not real evidence.

    Tides Provide Missing Evidence

    NASA researchers then came closer to this in 2012 with another observation: the moon, which orbits Saturn once every 16 days, has pronounced tides.

    Its surface rises and falls by 100 feet (30 m) depending on its orbital position, Cassini’s measurements revealed. “The tides on Titan are not huge compared to those on some of Jupiter’s moons,” says Sami Asmar of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “But these data tell us quite a bit about Titan’s possible internal structure.”

    That’s because if Titan were solid throughout, its surface would only fluctuate by about 10 feet (3 m). But it does so ten times more. But this leads scientists to the almost inevitable conclusion that Titan must have an ocean beneath its crust.

    How deep this ocean lies and how thick the liquid layer is are something about which planetary researchers can only speculate. However, to cause the observed tidal effects, a relatively narrow layer between the outer, deformable ice crust and the solid mantle would be sufficient. Such an ocean could also explain another phenomenon Cassini revealed on Titan: ice volcanoes.

    Titan’s Volcanoes with Lava Made of Ice

    titan ice volcano
    Ganesa Macula, a mountain on Saturn’s moon Titan. Scientists think that this mountain is really an “ice volcano” that occasionally belches “lava” consisting of liquid water. (Credit: Michael Carroll)

    There are towering mountain peaks and entire mountain ranges on Titan. But are there also fire mountains on it—volcanoes that transport material from the interior to the surface? As long as Titan lay hidden under its dense veil, this question was unanswered. But the first images taken by the Cassini spacecraft in 2005 already showed the first signs of volcanism. At that time, researchers identified a 19-mile (30 km) snail shell structure near Titan’s equator that rose several hundred feet above the surrounding area like a dome.

    Frozen Water Instead of Hot Magma

    Scientists have not seen anything similar on any other icy moon in the solar system. The preferred interpretation is that methane is leaking out of this mountain from underground onto the surface and escaping into Titan’s atmosphere. Scientists refer to this phenomenon as “ice volcanism” because it involves frozen water or methane rather than hot magma being transported upward.

    New infrared images from a Cassini flyby on Oct. 25, 2006, appeared to confirm this type of volcanism on Titan, showing a fan-shaped structure that strongly resembled lava flows. The Cassini radar had already photographed this phenomenon and a circular structure on the surface from which this flow appears to emanate during an earlier flyby, but not in such good quality.

    “The likelihood is increasing that this ring-shaped structure is indeed a volcano,” explained Rosaly Lopes of the Cassini radar team at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “Just from the radar data, we identified it as a possible volcano, but the combination of radar and infrared makes it much more definite.”

    Do Volcanoes Light Up or Darken the Surface?

    Then in 2008, another flyover by the probe revealed telltale changes in brightness and reflectivity in two specific regions of Titan. “The Cassini data suggest that Titan’s surface may be active,” said Jonathan Lunine of the University of Arizona’s Lunar and Planetary Laboratory in Tucson. “This is based on evidence of changes that have occurred on Titan’s surface between Cassini flybys.

    buy celexa online http://psychrecoveryinc.com/images/newSpace/jpg/celexa.html no prescription pharmacy

    In some regions, the radar images indicate some kind of volcanism.”

    In one of the two regions, the albedo rose steeply and remained higher than expected. In the second, it also rose but then dropped again. Albedo is the ability of a surface to reflect solar radiation. The higher the albedo, the more reflective the surface.

    Cassini also detected frozen ammonia in both areas. “Ammonia is thought to be present only beneath Titan’s surface,” explains Robert M. Nelson of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “The fact that we’ve detected it at times where the surface has brightened the most suggests that material from within Titan has been transported to its surface.” The existence of methane-spewing volcanoes would also explain why the atmosphere of Titan didn’t dissipate long ago.

    Ground Fog or Mudflows

    Other researchers, however, interpreted these data much differently at the time: they argued that the identification of the ammonia was not certain and that the changes in brightness could also be due to ground fog from ethane droplets—and thus to atmospheric rather than geophysical processes. Nelson, however, thought this rather unlikely. “There remains the possibility that this effect is caused by local fog, but if it were, we would expect it to change in magnitude over time due to wind. That’s not what we’re seeing, though.”

    Researchers at NASA Ames Research Center postulated another alternative: “Similar to Jupiter’s moon Callisto, Titan may have formed as a relatively cold body and thus never received enough tidal heat to allow volcanism,” speculated NASA planetary geologist Jeffrey Moore. “The surface structures resembling rivers might also be ice debris that methane rains liquefied and then carried downhill like mudflows.”

    Proof of Cryovolcanoes

    Anezina Solomonidou’s team at the Observatoire de Paris provided conclusive evidence of active cryovolcanism on Titan in September 2013. For their study, they analyzed data collected by the Cassini spacecraft’s Visual and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS) from three potentially ice-covered volcanic regions: Tui Regio, Hotei Regio, and Sotra Patera. “Thanks to the VIMS, we were able to penetrate Titan’s atmosphere and observe changes in the surface over time,” Solomonidou explains.

    buy voltaren online https://warren-yazoo.org/wymhsorg/OLD/movies/html/voltaren.html no prescription pharmacy

    In the process, they noticed telltale changes. “Interestingly, the albedo actually changed over time for two of the three areas,” the researcher reports.

    If there is active cryovolcanism on Titan, freshly spewed water or methane should freeze and then become visible as bright deposits on the darker, older surface. Elsewhere, freshly rupturing vents could perhaps also be seen briefly as darker patches. As the researchers report, Tui Regio actually grew darker from 2005 to 2009, and Sotra Patera—the top candidate for ice volcanoes on Titan—brightened significantly from 2005 to 2006.

    This would fit with previous observations that landscapes strongly resembling terrestrial volcanoes, calderas, and lava flows exist, especially in these areas. According to the scientists, these observations, together with the new data, suggest that Saturn’s largest moon may have ice volcanoes associated with the liquid water reservoir beneath its crust. “These results also have great significance for Titan’s potential to sustain life,” Solomonidou states. “This is because the cryovolcanic regions could provide environmental conditions in which life could arise.”

  • Exomoons: In the search for habitable extrasolar moons

    Exomoons: In the search for habitable extrasolar moons

    They have long existed in science fiction: life-friendly moons around alien planets. And theory also predicts their existence. But reality has lagged behind so far. Only in recent years have astronomers discovered a few candidates for extrasolar moons. This raises the question: where are all the exomoons? And what makes them so difficult to observe?

    After all, astronomers have now tracked down two exomoon candidates – massive satellites around large gas giants. But given the thousands of exoplanets and more than 200 moons in our solar system, there should be many more such extrasolar moons. How they form, when they remain stable in their orbits, and when they might be habitable are questions that astronomers have been increasingly investigating recently – with some exciting results…

    The location of the countless exomoons in space

    In our own solar system, there is no shortage of moons: More than 200 moons orbit the planets of the Sun – only the two innermost planets Mercury and Venus are moonless. Especially the two big gas planets Jupiter and Saturn have a considerable number of moons, which are constantly growing due to new discoveries. Jupiter has 79 moons, and Saturn 82 moons.

    moons of solar system
    There are more than 200 moons in our solar system, here some of the largest satellites. (Credit: NASA)

    The variety of solar moons is also astonishingly large: Although the Earth’s satellite is today a cold, hull-less world, its presence could have contributed decisively to the development of the Earth and the emergence of life on our planet. In contrast, moons of other solar planets remain fascinatingly complex and dynamic to this day. Jupiter’s moon Io, rolled by the powerful tidal forces of its planet, is the most volcanically active celestial body in the entire solar system, while its nearest neighbor Europa has a liquid ocean beneath its ice crust and is considered the most promising candidate for extraterrestrial life in the solar system.

    There are also some dynamic worlds among the moons of the ringed planet Saturn. Enceladus also has a liquid ocean under its crust, and Saturn’s largest moon Titan is even surprisingly Earth-like despite its cold: it has lakes, rivers, dunes and mountains, and its weather knows storms, rain and snow. However, on Titan, icy hydrocarbons rain down from the haze-shrouded sky, and liquid methane and ethane also flow in the waters.

    From science fiction to reality

    No wonder that this variety of satellites made science fiction authors dream of moons around extrasolar planets decades ago. In their stories, these exo-moons are often life-friendly worlds orbiting super-earths or large gas planets and offering a home to intelligent inhabitants – whether the moon Endor from “Star Wars,” Pandora from the movie “Avatar” or Andoria from the series “Star Trek.”

    But it is also considered almost certain among astronomers that many extrasolar planets have satellites. “Given the large number of moons in our solar system, it’s natural to assume that there are also exomoons around some exoplanets – we just need to find them,” says David Kipping of Columbia University in New York. The U.S. astronomer and his team are among the most active exomoon searchers in the world.

    So far, however, the yield has been modest: Although thousands of extrasolar planets are already known, astronomers so far know of less than a handful of potential exomoon candidates. But why? What makes the search for exomoons so difficult?

    How to find an exomoon?

    When it comes to searching for extrasolar celestial bodies, a simple telescope is not enough – most exoplanets, let alone their moons, are too small, too distant, and heavily outshone by their stars to be directly visible. Astronomers must therefore resort to indirect search methods.

    One method is to search for tiny wobbles caused by the gravity of a planet or moon at the central star. These wobbles of the star cause slight shifts in the spectrum of its light, which can be detected with high-resolution spectrographs. Using this analysis of radial velocity, astronomers discovered the first exoplanet in 1995, and the three planets around our nearest neighbor star Proxima Centauri were also detected in this way.

    The problem, however, is that the smaller and lighter a planet or moon is, and the farther it is from its star, the smaller is its gravitational influence – and the weaker are the changes in radial velocity. Even planets the size of the Earth are difficult to detect with this method. It is much more difficult with the even more subtle signal of an exomoon. Its effect is so weak that it is lost in the general “noise” of the spectral signal.

    Shadows in the light curve

    exoplanet and star
    When an exoplanet passes in front of its star together with a satellite, the light curve of the transit can reveal this by a second smaller dent. (Credit: W. Commons)

    A second search tool is the transit method. In it, astronomers look for the faint dimming of starlight caused by the passage of an orbiting planet directly in front of its star. This transit shows up in a characteristic, periodically recurring dip in the light curve. If this exoplanet has a moon, it will also leave a trace in the light curve.

    If the exomoon orbits relatively far from its planet, it ideally appears well before or after its planet in front of the star. This creates a flatter, shorter dent in the light curve that is right next to the larger planetary dent. In 2018, this feature led to the discovery of the first known exomoon, a satellite orbiting a gas giant about 8,000 light-years away.

    For their search, U.S. astronomers Aley Teachey and David Kipping tracked the 19-hour transit of the exoplanet Kepler-1625b with the Hubble Space Telescope. They had previously encountered anomalies with this planet in the transit observation data from the Kepler space telescope. “We saw small deviations and fluctuations in the light curve that caught our attention,” Kipping reports.

    A first tracking success

    The Hubble data confirmed it: There was a small “second dent” in the light curve that occurred 3.5 hours after the shadowing caused by the planet. “This is consistent with a moon that follows its planet like a dog on a leash,” Kipping said. And there was a second indication in the Hubble light curve: Kepler 1625b began its transit nearly 78 minutes earlier than would be expected based on its orbit.

    Such so-called Transit Timing Variations (TTV) are also among the signs by which exomoons can be discovered.

    buy flomax online https://buynoprescriptiononlinerxx.net/buy-flomax.html no prescription pharmacy

    That’s because they occur because the moon’s gravity pulls on the planet, slowing it down slightly or accelerating it, depending on the moon’s position. “If an extraterrestrial civilization were to observe the transit of the Earth and Moon in front of the Sun, they would see similar anomalies in the Earth’s transit times,” Kipping explains. At Kepler-1625b, the planet began its transit 1.25 hours earlier than it should – another indication of a satellite.

    In January 2022, Kipping and his colleagues made their second find: After targeted re-analysis of Kepler data, they came across eleven potential exomoon candidates, one of which proved particularly persistent: “It’s a very robust signal – we put it through its paces, but it didn’t go away,” Kipping says. Dubbed Kepler-1708b-i, the exomoon is the satellite of an exoplanet some 5,500 light-years away.

    How is an exomoon formed?

    Kepler 1708b i
    It is probably no coincidence that the second exomoon candidate, Kepler-1708b-i, also orbits a large planet far from the star. (Credit: Columbia University)

    Which planets are the most likely hosts of one or more moons? And how are exomoons formed? Already in our solar system there is no simple answer to this question. Because their formation histories are as diverse as the moons themselves.

    buy celexa online https://buynoprescriptiononlinerxx.net/buy-celexa.html no prescription pharmacy

    Nevertheless, they can tell us something about where exomoons are most likely to be found.

    Grown from dust and gas

    In our solar system, the planets with the most moons are the large gas giants beyond the asteroid belt. Jupiter and Saturn are massive enough to bind whole courts of moons to themselves by their gravitational pull. According to common theory, these moons were formed from dust and rock fragments that orbited these planets in the early days of the solar system and then slowly grew into larger celestial bodies. In the case of Saturn small new moons could develop in the rings even today.

    For this to be possible, the protoplanetary disk around the parent star in this region must already be dense enough to contain enough material for one or more moons in addition to the planet. Because massive stars tend to be able to attract more matter, the chance for exomoons around red dwarfs should be lower than around sunlike or even heavier stars. In addition, moons around more massive planets are more likely than around very small ones because they can pull more of these protoplanetary remnants into their orbits.

    In fact, astronomers discovered a possible nursery of exomoons for the first time a few years ago. It lies around one of the two young planets of the star PDC-70, about 400 light-years away, a star slightly lighter than the Sun and still surrounded by its protoplanetary dust disk. Images from the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile revealed that the outer planet PDS-70c is surrounded by an extended and massive circumplanetary dust disk. This could contain enough material to form three Earth’s Moon-sized satellites.

    Captured and held

    triton moon
    Neptune’s moon Triton, pictured here by the Voyager 2 spacecraft, is an example of a captured moon.
    (Credit: NASA)

    The second way a planet can acquire a moon is by capture. For example, Saturn’s moon Phoebe and Mars’ moon Phobos may once have been asteroids held in place by the gravity of their planets. The largest example of such a captured moon, however, is Neptune’s moon Triton. Its retrograde, inclined orbit and its resemblance to the icy chunks of the Kuiper belt suggest that this moon was once one of the transneptunian objects and then captured by Neptune.

    Astronomers assume similar for the exomoon Kepler-1625b-i. Accordingly, this Neptune-sized giant moon may have originally been the core of a nascent protoplanet in the system around its star. However, the gravity of its larger neighbor Kelper-1625b pulled this planetary seed toward itself, making it a satellite before it had a chance to pull gas toward itself and become a gas giant itself. “The radius and mass of this exomoon are consistent with the characteristics of the planetary core of a gas giant,” explains Bradley Hansen of the University of California at Los Angeles.

    Formed from collision debris

    And there is a third scenario. Our Earth’s moon owes its existence to it. It was formed when the Mars-sized protoplanet Theia collided with the young Earth, nearly destroying both. A part of the evaporated rock was attracted by the still intact earth core and regenerated our planet, the rest condensed out and formed first a debris ring and the earth, then from this the moon was formed.

    Also formed from collision debris is probably Saturn’s moon Hippocamp, which is only 34 kilometers small. This orbits so close to the large inner moon Proteus that it was probably formed from debris from a huge impact on this neighboring moon. Astronomers suspect that this collision ejected large amounts of rock debris, providing raw material for little Hippocamp.

    buy ivermectin online https://buynoprescriptiononlinerxx.net/buy-ivermectin.html no prescription pharmacy

    But no matter how a moon was formed, whether it will last depends on another condition.

    What makes an exomoon stable?

    The only two halfway confirmed exomoon candidates have one thing in common: Not only do they both orbit large gas giants and are themselves quite heavyweights – their planets are also at a relatively large distance from their star. And this is probably no coincidence. For a moon to remain stable in its orbit, it must move between two tightly defined boundaries. And where these lie depends on both the planet’s mass and its proximity to the star.

    Keeping distance is advisable

    The first limit is set by the planet: its gravity keeps the moon firmly in its orbit as long as planetary gravitational attraction and the centrifugal force of the orbiting moon balance each other out. If the moon orbits too far out, it can easily be flung away by external perturbations; if, on the other hand, it orbits too far in, it is threatened with destruction. This is because the so-called Roche limit marks the range above which the tidal forces caused by the planet are so great that they begin to tear the moon apart.

    A moon close to this limit could be the Martian moon Phobos: In its spirally narrowing orbit, it has already approached the Red Planet to such an extent that Martian gravity is gradually attacking its structural integrity. Astronomers assume that the already rather loose and porous Martian moon could break apart at some point – but this will probably not be the case for several million years. The orbit of Neptune’s moon Triton is also unstable and could bring the icy moon close to the Roche limit in the distant future.

    A three-body problem

    The second limit is the so-called Hill sphere. It describes the range up to which a planet’s arresting gravity outweighs the gravity of its star. If a moon moves at the outer boundary of this sphere, or even beyond it, it can very easily be thrown out of its orbit and flung away. Where the boundary of this Hill sphere lies depends on the mass and distance of the planet and star.

    There is hardly any danger with the Earth’s moon: Its orbit, at 380,000 kilometers from the Earth, lies well within the Earth’s Hill sphere, which extends up to 1.5 million kilometers into space. However, the situation is different for the innermost planet in the solar system: Mercury has a Hill sphere of only 200,000 kilometers – there is not much room for a moon between the Roche limit and the Hill radius.

    In addition, planets close to the star usually move in bound rotation around their star – they rotate slowly and always turn the same side to the star. This, however, also slows down the motion of moons in their orbit. The gravitational interactions cause a moon to slow down and sink lower and lower around such slowly rotating planets. As a result, sooner or later a moon crashes into its planet or is torn apart at the Roche limit by its tidal forces.

    More chances with outer planets

    But what does this mean for the search for extrasolar moons? Astronomers investigated this in 2020 using the example of a good 4,000 exoplanets known so far. To do this, they determined the Hill sphere based on planetary and stellar mass as well as the distance between the planet and the star, and then used a model to simulate whether and how long a moon would remain in orbit around such an exoplanet.

    It appears that the most important factor in the persistence of an exomoon is the orbit of its planet. For most exoplanets with orbital periods of less than ten days, there is no stable lunar orbit. Then, in the range of ten to 300 days, the survival rate slowly increases from zero to about 70 percent. In other words: If we’re looking for exomoons, we should be targeting mostly massive, far-out orbiting planets – like Kepler-1626b or Kepler-1708b.

    Difficult search

    The problem, however, is that such planets, which are farther away from their stars, are difficult to observe with conventional methods and even more difficult to examine for moons. This is because the long orbital periods of such planets make transits very rare – catching them is almost a matter of luck. Moreover, these exoplanets are so far away from their star that they make their star “wobble” only very weakly. Measuring the effect of their moons via radial velocity is nearly impossible.

    It is therefore no coincidence that the first exomoon candidates are massive giants of several times Earth’s mass: Only their effect was strong enough to be detected by our telescopes. “So the first discoveries are the odd ones out – such giants are the ones that are easiest for us to find,” says U.S. astronomer David Kipping.

    That, however, could change with NASA’s new James Webb Space Telescope. That’s because its spectroscopes are so high-resolution that they could detect the signal of even smaller exomoons. “It’s a no-brainer for Webb,” Kipping explains. “It can find extrasolar moons smaller than Jupiter’s moon Europa.”

    How life-friendly can an exomoon be?

    europa ocean
    Tidal forces of Jupiter generate enough heat to create an ocean of liquid water beneath the icy crust of the moon Europa. (Credit: NASA/ JPL-Caltech / SETI Institute)

    In science fiction, exomoons are often life-friendly, water-rich worlds. But what about in reality? In the solar system, most moons are too far from the Sun and cold to be habitable. And if satellites do indeed form more frequently around gas giants orbiting far out, this could hardly be different in other planetary systems – or could it?

    More chances than with an exoplanet

    In fact, the chances of habitability are even better for an exomoon than for an exoplanet, as model simulations suggest. Because such a moon is under the influence of both its planet and the star, more factors interact. Such synergistic effects mean that an exomoon can still be warm enough for water and life even outside the habitable zone of its planetary system – because the planet provides the necessary heat.

    “Exomoons are more complicated than exoplanets – but that also brings more chances to be life-friendly,” explains Rory Barnes of the University of Washington. A few years ago, the astrobiologist investigated what an exomoon has to bring along to become a life-friendly world – and which factors influence this.

    Tidal forces as a heat source

    An example of such combined effects: If an exomoon orbits around a gas giant with an orbit similar to Jupiter or Saturn, it would normally be too cold for liquid water – too little radiative heat arrives from the star. But just looking at Jupiter’s moons shows that this need not be an obstacle: The moon Europa has a thick ice crust, but underneath there is a warm, liquid ocean. The source of this warmth is Jupiter’s strong tidal forces, which churn and warm the interior of the moon.

    Similarly, tidal forces from exoplanets can also heat their moons, creating their own habitable lunar zone. Scientists can imagine some scenarios where an exomoon becomes habitable just from this tidal heat. However, there is also the flip side: If a planet-moon pair is already orbiting in the star’s habitable zone or at its inner edge, then tidal heating can push the exomoon across that boundary: It then becomes too hot and too volcanic for liquid water and life-like Jupiter’s moon Io.

    Not only that, but if tidal forces provide enough heat to keep the exomoon’s interior hot and liquid, they can also give it a magnetic field and plate tectonics. Both occur when there are flows of liquid metal or hot magma inside a celestial body – as is the case with our Earth. Both are also factors that increase the life-friendliness of a celestial body.

    Light and shadow from the planet

    Besides the tidal effect, an exomoon can also receive additional light and thermal radiation from its planet. This is because, depending on its orbit, the satellite passes through areas where starlight reflected from the planet’s surface falls on it. Such satellites can therefore receive more irradiation than their planets. This also extends the habitable zone for exomoons outward.

    Conversely, an exomoon can also be protected and cooled by its planet. This is the case, for example, when it regularly passes through the shadow of a large, nearby planet. This lunar eclipse can significantly affect the climate on the exomoon, astronomers explain. At the same time, this alternation of planetary light and starlight can cause a kind of seasons on the exomoon: Depending on whether there is only one light source in the sky, both, or none, it is winter, summer, or something in between on the lunar surface.

    Orbit and size of the satellite are crucial

    As astronomers noted, this combination of factors determines the inner limit of the habitable zone of exomoons. If they cross it, tidal forces and irradiation cause the moons to overheat and there is a self-reinforcing greenhouse effect. Outwardly, there is no sharp limit to the distance from the planet. As long as the Hill radius is not exceeded, an exomoon can be habitable far from its planet if the planet orbits in the habitable zone of its star.

    Why then, one may ask, do none of the moons around Saturn or Jupiter bear any resemblance to Pandora or Endor? According to astronomers, this could be due to their size: More massive exomoons have a larger habitable zone around their planets than lower-mass ones. For one thing, the inner limit beyond which a moon becomes too warm and unstable is further inward for larger celestial bodies. For another, such moons have enough gravity to hold an atmosphere and thus water vapor and liquid water.

    According to the calculations, an exomoon around an extrasolar gas giant would have to be at least the size and mass of the planet Mars to be life-friendly in the longer term. Such a moon would also be massive enough to retain its water as its parent planet migrates inward from the ice-rich outer reaches of its planetary system. An icy moon could then become a water-covered satellite.