Tag: carbon

  • How Do We Measure the Age of Things on Earth?

    How Do We Measure the Age of Things on Earth?

    From where did we come, and how did we evolve? A variety of scientific fields are interested in these issues, and they have no way to find answers without reliable dating methods. This is why scientists use a wide range of geological and archaeological “clocks” to date objects. The adjectives “old” and “young” in Earth’s historical context refer to periods of thousands to millions of years rather than the average human lifespan. Geochronology, the study of the absolute ages of geological and archaeological objects such as rocks, minerals, wood, and human remains, has developed various techniques for that. It has greatly influenced our contemporary worldview by revolutionizing our knowledge of Earth’s past.

    Radiocarbon dating method

    Radiocarbon dating method

    The so-called radiocarbon method, sometimes termed C14 carbon dating, is perhaps the most well-known technique for estimating age. Because carbon has three naturally occurring isotopes (C12, C13, and C14). There is just one carbon nucleus (C14) with 14 nucleons (6 protons and 8 neutrons) for every trillion of the stable C12 with 12 nucleons in the nucleus. The decay of the C14 isotope to nitrogen has a half-life of approximately 5,730 years.

    The lower the amount of C14 isotope, the older the object.

    All living things maintain a consistent C12:C14 ratio because they continually breathe in newly generated C14 from the environment. But C14 is not replenished if the animal or plant dies. Since the ratio of the two carbon isotopes in its tissues gradually becomes more favorable to C12 over time, this process provides the foundation for the radiocarbon clock. Wood, fossilized plant material, and bone can all be dated by analyzing their isotope ratios to determine how long they have been out of contact with C14. Similar techniques can be used to date other carbon-based substances.

    A historical glance

    The C14 clock’s main benefit is that compounds containing carbon are prevalent in both living and nonliving materials. C14 dating can be used in archaeology and paleontology to determine dates ranging from 300 to 60,000 years. But carbon mostly only exists in organic material.

    It was in 1934 that Franz Kurie first proposed the possible existence of carbon-14. In 1940, at the University of California Radiation Laboratory, Martin Kamen and Sam Ruben made the discovery of carbon-14. In 1946, Willard Libby developed radiocarbon dating based on carbon-14 to determine the age of artifacts, rocks, and even water.

    There were only a few institutions in the 1950s and 1960s responsible for the development of the C14 detection technique, which employed counting tubes to measure the decay of the carbon isotope and made it available for use in archaeology for the purpose of dating. This was the first time that archaeologists had used a scientific technique of dating.

    Radiocarbon dating has allowed for a comprehensive study of the last 50,000 years of human history, shedding light on questions such as when Neanderthals went extinct in Europe and how the ancestors of modern humans spread in terms of their physical characteristics. However, this method of dating has also illuminated the end of the last ice age and the beginning of the present warm period, the change from nomadic to settled agriculture, and the first use of metals.

    Eruption of a volcano

    C14 dating has become standard practice in the field of archaeology. One of the many unexpected findings made possible by the C14 approach is the recalculation of the timing of a Late Bronze Age volcanic eruption on Santorini, which happened in the Aegean. Based on a combination of dynastic chronicle research and astronomical evidence, Egypt’s historical chronology places the eruption of the volcano in 1520 BC. Objects that survived the volcanic eruption and were buried in ash and rocks were analyzed using the C14 technique, which led researchers to infer that the eruption happened one hundred years earlier than previously thought.

    Groundwater radiocarbon dating is another use of the C14 method. Using it, researchers can distinguish between glacial reserves and recently developed bodies of water in North Africa, where people rely on underground water supplies for drinking and other uses. Everyday applications of the C14 approach include verifying the authenticity of artifacts, determining the age of wines and spirits, and finding synthetic ingredients in purportedly organic items.

    Zircon dating method

    Zircon dating method
    Credit: Queensland University of Technology

    When did the Earth form? Because it only accounts for events that occurred during the last few thousand years on Earth, the radiocarbon approach is insufficient to provide an answer. But then, how can you put a time stamp on something as basic as Earth’s creation? Amazingly, geoscientists have realized that looking at the microcosm and focusing on the microminerals inside rocks is the greatest way to get an answer to this issue. From this investigation, a picture can be constructed of the progression and chronology of Earth’s history on a global and continental scale.

    Zircon, known as the “star mineral” for its importance in reconstructing Earth’s past, is one of these little time capsules. The zirconium, silicon, and oxygen compound (zirconium silicate (ZrSiO4)) existed for nearly 4.4 billion years, making it the oldest mineral on Earth. Zircon can be found in abundance in the Earth’s crust. Typically measuring between 0.05 and 0.3 microns in size, it is found as minute grains in the rocks.

    Uranium atoms encased in a crystalline structure

    The presence of uranium in zircon’s crystal structure is an attractive trait for dating purposes. Since uranium decays into lead over time, scientists can use the decay rate to determine the age of an object by measuring the uranium/lead ratio. Uranium decay products are trapped in the crystal lattice of surrounding zircon to varying degrees depending on when the zircon formed.

    Zircon can be used as a “clock” that can measure up to 4.4 billion years into the past, making it more accurate than the radiocarbon approach. Consequently, this technique works very well for dating rocks. Due to the very lengthy half-lives of uranium’s decay to lead, it cannot be used for this purpose over timescales of less than around 1 million years.

    Zircon aids in the study of continental prehistory

    How the continents were first created and how they eventually developed is a fundamental subject for Earth historians. In modern times, we have learned that the continents on Earth’s surface move gently in a back-and-forth motion. They could run against one another or shatter into pieces. However, the age of the various parts of the continents varies widely. Each continent is really made up of several other, smaller continents called “terranes” that range in age from very young to very old. There is a unique signature of time for each terrane. But how can we figure out the age distribution of each one?

    Gondwana and Pangea

    In order to address this issue, geoscientists analyze zircon for the uranium and lead isotopes it contains. This technique of dating has been utilized to investigate several aspects of crustal rocks. Crusts have a complicated history. 550–500 million years ago, it started on the northern margin of Gondwana, a prehistoric continent in the southern hemisphere. A number of massive chunks separated off the primitive continent’s northern border. They moved up north as separate continents, eventually forming a complex mosaic.

    About 350–330 million years ago, the core region of the newly developing primeval continent Pangea was where the jigsaw pieces were ultimately fused together. However, 120 million years ago, Pangea, the supercontinent, started to split apart into different continents. The Atlantic Ocean opened, Africa was divided from South America, and North America and Europe were separated from one another.

    The zircon data show, for instance, that the European crust is made up of smaller continents that were still linked to modern-day North Africa 500 million years ago. Central Europe thus sits on a piece of the Earth’s crust that was once part of Africa many eons ago. For the record, Canada is home to the world’s oldest continental crust. Age estimates put it at upwards of 4 billion years. When compared, Europe is a very young continent.

    Uranium dating method

    How do we measure the age of things. Etched fission tracks in an apatite. Uranium dating method.
    Etched fission tracks in an apatite. (Credit: Researchgate.net)

    When it comes to dating the rock, the potential mechanisms of uranium in minerals are considerable as well. In addition to dating the rock, they also show how its temperature has evolved through time. You can use this to figure out when lava solidified or how slowly a rock cooled.

    Everything functions on a very basic principle: Fission marks are tiny destructions caused by fission products blasted into the mineral lattice when a uranium nucleus contained inside the material decays. These fission markings, which appear as thin lines and notches if the mineral grain is polished, prepared in a certain manner, and seen under a microscope, are readily apparent. Since the rate of uranium decay is well established, scientists can determine the age of a mineral by counting the number of fission traces inside it. The greater the number of traces, the longer the material was exposed to radiation, and hence, the greater the amount of damage it suffered.

    Intense heat causes a time reset

    But there’s more to think about: These fission marks can only occur if the mineral isn’t overheated. Fission markings in the lattice of apatite, for instance, shorten if the temperature is over 60 degrees Celsius. Above 110 degrees, the crystal lattice heals, and the atoms that were displaced by the fission products return to their original lattice positions, leaving no evidence behind. The timer on the fission track has been turned back to zero.

    The “clock,” which is dependent on the temperature of the rock, aids geologists in several ways: Fission traces cannot occur in the rock at these depths because the rock is too hot. If it is then hauled upward by plate tectonics, these traces will become visible. Geoscientists may calculate the time it took for a layer of rock to ascend from the depths of the Earth’s crust to the summit of a mountain range based on its present height, the known decay rate of uranium, and the quantity of fission traces it contains. For instance, scientists have calculated that the Val Bregaglia in Switzerland, is rising at a pace of 0.3 mm each year.

    Ancient glass and erupting volcanoes

    This approach can also be used in dating rocks: Lava often hardens within a short period of time after a volcanic explosion. Thus, the age of a volcanic mountain can be determined from the last eruption or formation of the corresponding volcanic rock by analyzing the fission residues in its minerals. This method can be used to date man-made objects as well. Glass was often dyed yellow using a uranium oxide compound from Roman times until well into the 19th century in Europe, North America, and China. Fission markings indicate the time the glass solidified, and can be used to date objects made of glass, such as drinking glasses or figurines.

    Potassium-argon dating

    Radioactive decay of Potassium-40.
    Radioactive decay of Potassium-40. (Credit: UC.edu)

    Also known as K–Ar dating, the potassium-argon dating is a technique for establishing the age of rocks by analyzing the abundances of radioactive argon and potassium inside them. Radioactive potassium-40 decays to argon-40 in minerals and rocks, providing the basis for this dating technique.

    But there is a similar decay process for potassium-40, which results in calcium-40. So, the age of a mineral or rock can be calculated from the proportion of these radioactive isotopes.

    However, the widespread availability of nonradiogenic calcium in minerals and rocks makes the calcium-potassium age technique seldom used. The escape of argon to the atmosphere during volcanism, on the other hand, results in a relatively low argon abundance on Earth.

    However, although radiocarbon dating can only identify an age up to around 60,000 years, potassium-argon dating can go back as far as about 100,000 years. As a result, a void between 60,000 and 100,000 years has been found, which must be bridged using other dating methods. Thermoluminescence dating covers this by going from 40,000 to 200,000 years ago.

    Nature as a dating method

    In addition to radiometric dating, geochronologists may use a variety of different techniques to determine when an object was formed. The foundation for this comes from the fact that many natural materials, like wood or sediments, document and archive temporal events and changes across time. The only thing we need to do is figure out how to read and accurately interpret nature’s time records.

    Annual rings in wood and sediment

    The seasons have an impact on the emergence of new geological structures or the deposition of new materials. For instance, during tree development, one can count the rings in the wood and, under ideal circumstances, estimate the tree’s age to within a year. Dendrochronology, the study of tree rings, has allowed researchers to construct chronologies for continents that go back some 14,000 years. Tree-ring dating, like carbon-14 dating, is an important tool in archaeology for establishing the age of structures like fortifications and habitations.

    However, Varve chronology, also known as soil dating, examines the layers of sediments to determine when they were deposited. Lake sediment, like tree rings, is produced in seasonal cycles, with summer producing a slightly different composition and, generally, a different colored layer than winter. Therefore, the age of a sediment layer can be determined, as can the biological and climatic conditions that existed during a certain time period, by analyzing the sequence and thickness of these layers.

    Depending on the specific circumstances, this method may provide an age estimate of between 40,000 and 70,000 years. The effects of historical climate change are typically inferred through varves.

    Thermoluminescence dating

    Room Temperature thermoluminescence. Thermoluminescence dating.
    Room Temperature thermoluminescence

    The term “thermoluminescence” is a combination of two ancient Greek and Latin words meaning thermos “hot” and lumen “light”. The term means “light from heat”.

    Natural radioactive elements found in rocks and ceramics are used in various techniques to determine the age of rocks. Quartz and feldspar, for example, have electrons that get essentially imprisoned at particular disruptions in the crystal lattice due to the radiation released by these materials.

    Electrons are affected by these disturbances in the same way that spheres are affected by depressions on a surface; they may roll into them but cannot roll out on their own. Therefore, the radioactive decay energy is still present in the materials. Light or heat releases the trapped electrons, which then rearrange themselves and release any extra energy as luminescence.

    How much energy the radioactive inclusions have stored in the material can be deduced from how bright the luminescence radiation is. In this way, it can be used to date items to at least 100,000 years ago. Thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence are two terms used to describe these techniques for determining the age of the rocks.

    Thermoluminescence dating is advantageous because it can be used to date objects anywhere from 40,000 to 200,000 years ago, a time range that falls in between those of radiocarbon and potassium-argon dating.

  • What Makes Diamonds So Hard?

    What Makes Diamonds So Hard?

    Marilyn Monroe famously sang, “Diamonds are a girl’s best friend.” Not only do those who like flashy jewelry have a great deal of respect for diamonds, but so do scientists, engineers, and the makers of equipment. This is due to the fact that diamond is the hardest material of all. When pressed against another substance, the diamond will always triumph. This is why diamond dust is sometimes used to coat instruments like grinding wheels. But how does a diamond get to be so incredibly tough?

    Diamond has a rigid, three-dimensional structure made up of perfectly similar atoms bonded together in perfect alignment. The only element present in diamonds is carbon. Each atom in this structure is bound to four others in a precise manner, forming a three-dimensional lattice. This lattice also provides tremendous resistance to any kind of rearrangement.

    Nothing can move an atom from its position

    How easily individual atoms or large clusters of atoms inside a material can be moved against one another is a primary factor in determining that substance’s hardness on the subatomic level. If the material provides a lot of resistance to the structural change, it’s considered “hard.”

    Almost no atomic rearranging of a diamond is possible. All four of a carbon atom’s neighbors have the same amount of space between them since it is precisely determined where the bonds and the atoms are located in a diamond.

    The atomic structure of a diamond.
    The atomic structure of a diamond.

    No matter where you look, the angle between any pair of nearby atoms in a diamond is 109 degrees. You just can’t change the angles to move the diamond atoms against one another by applying pressure on the material. That’s what makes the bonds in a diamond so stiff.

    There has to be a full rupture of a carbon-carbon bond for it to happen. But it takes a tremendous amount of power, and the diamond no longer becomes a diamond once this bond is broken.

    What about graphite?

    Graphite, from pencil lead, an unusually soft substance, is the diamond’s closest cousin. Similarly, this is made up entirely of carbon. Yet, in graphite, the atoms have a layered arrangement. The graphite atoms are securely held together inside the layers, yet there are very mild forces between the layers themselves. Because of this, they may be displaced against one another with the gentle pressure of a pencil. Then, a few of the layers fall off and settle on the paper below. Because of this, graphite makes a great lubricant as well.

    The structure of graphite compared to diamond.
    The structure of graphite compared to diamond. (Image: Diepizza – CC BY-SA 4.0)

    Only under extreme conditions of high pressure, such as those found at tremendous depths, could diamonds form naturally. If exposed to the atmosphere at Earth’s surface, they would actually change into graphite under low pressure, which is a more stable form.

    This, however, takes place at such a snail’s pace that it is impossible to track. You shouldn’t put your diamond ring in the oven since this process accelerates at higher temperatures. The diamond will burn like coal if you put a flame on it. Even though diamonds are durable and reliable, they are not as hard to break as some marketers would have us believe. 

  • What Are the Carbon Sinks on Earth and How Do They Work?

    What Are the Carbon Sinks on Earth and How Do They Work?

    Only a fraction of the carbon dioxide emitted by burning coal, oil, and natural gas stays in the atmosphere. Rest goes into carbon sinks like seas and forests. The only issue is whether these “silent heroes” will support long-term climate change policies. Without nature’s aid, the carbon dioxide emitted by burning coal, oil, and natural gas would have raised Earth’s surface temperatures far more than ever recorded. Some of this greenhouse gas has been trapped by natural filters in the seas and forests. These carbon sinks vary a lot, but they work on a similar principle: they transform carbon dioxide in the air into other carbon molecules, which are no longer greenhouse gas and can’t fuel the climate.

    Oceans as Carbon Sinks

    Oceans are important carbon sinks. They still absorb a quarter of the carbon dioxide from fossil-fuel power plants, oil and gas heating, internal combustion engines, and organic sources. In water, carbon dioxide forms carbonic acid. However, extracting this carbon dioxide from the air acidifies the waters.

    But this whole process can’t be sped up since carbon dioxide enters the water via the ocean surface which can’t be enlarged. Surface water can hold only so much carbon dioxide. The greenhouse gas can only be absorbed as long as there is fresh water available. This needs constant sea currents. But the speed of the currents restricts air-water interaction. Nevertheless, the seas can absorb 73 to 93% of human-produced CO2 today if thousands of years are given.

    Weathering as a Carbon Sink

    Weathering is the second way of oceans extract CO2 from the air. The breakdown or dissolution of rocks and minerals on the surface of the Earth is known as weathering. Basalt combines with carbonic acid in waters with carbon dioxide to generate bicarbonate, which stays dissolved in saltwater. Weathering act as a carbon sink by storing the CO2 in sediments which reduces the atmospheric carbon dioxide.

    Long-term, oceanic processes keep the climate steady.

    buy furosemide online https://visualhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/furosemide.html no prescription pharmacy

    The carbon dioxide boosts the temperatures. This heat speeds weathering, which reduces atmospheric carbon dioxide and slows climate change. Basalt weathers more slowly at cooler temperatures, removing less CO2 from the air.

    Even after big swings, the climate can still stabilize. But since the sea’s climate sink only works over millennia, we need something faster than that. The excavators, wheel loaders, and other machinery can increase natural weathering.


    With artificial weathering, you could finely ground basalt and disperse it offshore. Artificial weathering can collect 20 to 30% of the CO2 emitted by humanity.

    Artificial Weathering

    This carbon sink would be a natural process in which rock flour weathers, permanently absorb carbon dioxide from water. Four tons of ground olivine basalt remove one ton of carbon from water, which is reabsorbed as carbon dioxide. Ten billion tons of carbon are emitted annually by burning oil, gas, and coal, thus 40 billion tons of rock may counterbalance this.

    Theoretically, you could crush a Matterhorn-sized basalt mountain into powder every year and scatter it in the ocean. That would offset 50% of our CO2 emissions today. This number seems idealistic, yet it’s comparable to current mining. This procedure also works in cold water. Any rocks near the shore would be good enough as this would also save the transport expenses.

    Algae as a Carbon Sink

    There are more carbon sinks hiding in the oceans. In theory, the iron fertilization in the Southern Ocean might boost algae development. After dying, many of these species fall to the ocean floor, removing carbon dioxide from the climate cycle. This method mirrors the natural process: During cold times, rains fall and strong winds push continent dust to the Southern Ocean.

    This dust’s iron is scarce and functions as fertilizer for the algae. This technique likely only works in the Southern Ocean, where phosphate and nitrate are plentiful. Iron fertilization would also swiftly deplete these chemicals in other waters. Iron fertilization might offset 10% of current CO2 emissions alone in the Southern Ocean.

    However, the adverse effects have barely been studied. No one knows whether humans have already destroyed this carbon sink of the Southern Ocean: Large whales spread fertile feces in the ocean. And due to whale hunting, most of this fertilizer is disappearing, and this carbon sink may be less efficient now.

    On the other hand, another carbon sink may be emerging in the waters. Climate warming seems to be extending the low-oxygen zones. Algal blooms are fertilized by the extra nutrients and in oxygen-free zones, dead creatures settle at the bottom, where oxygen-breathing organisms can’t break them down. Dead algae sink to the ocean floor and depending on environmental circumstances, these sludge layers of algae become shale or petroleum over millions of years.

    The price for such a carbon sink is significant, however, since the sludge replaces a whole ecosystem with an underwater desert where fish, crabs, squid, and many other animals cannot thrive.

    Permafrost

    Permafrost and ice in Herschel Island, Canada, 2012.
    Permafrost and ice in Herschel Island, Canada, 2012. Image: Boris Radosavljevic, CC-A-2.0)

    The biosphere on land recovers around 25% of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions from the air. However, this is not steady for all parts of the world. Permafrost in Siberia and North America stores massive quantities of carbon that plants formerly scooped out of the air as carbon dioxide and transformed into leaves, timber, roots, and other biomass.

    Microorganisms destroy carbon sink leftovers as it thaws in summer. Methane, a strong greenhouse gas, is produced first. If temperatures rise, permafrost thaws longer and generates more methane, turning the carbon sink into a carbon source.

    This occurs if methane from the earth quickly rises through reed stalks. On the way, other microbes feed on methane and produce carbon dioxide. In Siberia’s permafrost soils, there are giant patches of microbes, each releasing varied quantities of greenhouse gases.

    Higher temperatures allow permafrost plants more time to thrive in the summer, while also increasing the carbon dioxide which speeds up the growth and thus, the vegetation absorbs more carbon dioxide as a result. This means, tundra is another carbon sink source.

    Wetlands

    Same for different latitudes’ wetlands. Microorganisms degrade plant material in these marshes to create methane, which is progressively broken down and turned into carbon dioxide. The plants also extract and store carbon dioxide as biomass. Since plant remnants are only transformed partly into greenhouse gases, the soil biomass grows slowly and wetlands remain a carbon sink. Still, wetlands’ contribution to climate balance is small.

    Forests

    Trees fare much better. Forests are one of the greatest CO2 sinks. Land plants remove 120 billion tons of carbon from the air each year, half of which is permanently stored and half exhaled. Tropical forests store 40% of the 60 billion metric tons of carbon, while temperate forests store 25%.

    Forests are the land’s largest carbon sink. But most of the carbon stored in plants is released as a greenhouse gas when the leaves fall off or the plants die, thus vegetation stores only two to three billion metric tons of carbon yearly over the long term. This accounts for a quarter of human-caused CO2 emissions.

    Forests are called “green lungs” because they take in carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen, whereas our lungs do the reverse. Not all forests are good carbon sinks. In a commercial forest, foresters cut down trees and when their wood is burnt, the trees no longer store the carbon dioxide. If wood is used for furniture, structures, or construction, the carbon sink effect is extended, but not permanently. Because forest wood no longer migrates into the soil to function as a carbon sink again.

    Unused woods are the most efficient carbon sink, but they’re dwindling. Climate change further stresses certain woodlands. Prolonged drought at the beginning of the 21st century prompted insect infestations on Canada’s Pacific coast, destroying forests the size of Montana. These areas become carbon sources instead.

    Does Reforestation Hurt the Environment?

    The Paris Agreement wants more forests planted to halt climate change. However, for a real impact, huge barren regions like the Sahara must be forested. In theory, groundwater could reforest an area the size of the United States. But there are side effects: The subtropical heat would drain the water from these newly woods and most would fall on the Sahara again.

    buy zithromax online https://visualhealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/zithromax.html no prescription pharmacy

    A minor part would wind up in the seas, and when this happens it would raise sea levels 13 cm by 2100.

    A desert that had little flora reflects most sunlight into space. However, dark woodlands absorb more radiation and heat. For instance, this might affect wind systems and monsoon rains in India. Computer studies reveal that Saharan woodlands might absorb so much more sunlight that global temperatures would actually soar. Reforesting the Sahara might generate a carbon sink but also warm the global temperatures.

    Reforestation as a carbon sink is overrated in other regions of the globe, too. In principle, 11.5 square miles (30 million square km) might be reforested globally, the size of Africa. If this forest expands and isn’t chopped down again, it might absorb two-thirds of our greenhouse gas emissions.

    Much of the possible reforestation area is currently utilized for fields and pastures and will be required for food in the future. The carbon sinks and sources of these fields, meadows, and pastures remain unknown. They’re probably too varied. New rice types developed in China need less flooding than traditional kinds. These plants conserve water. This is important because the flooded rice fields emit substantial amounts of methane. The rice fields have warmed the environment less since the discovery of this rice type.

    Biochar as a Carbon Sink

    Biochar as a Carbon Sink

    Farmers might mix charcoal into the soil to produce new carbon sinks. Charcoal is created from plant wastes. The other half of the biomass forms biochar. This helps the soil because small holes and scratches enhance its surface area. This vast region stores nutrients, water, and soil microorganisms that are needed for effective soil fertility.

    Biochar persists in the soil for a long period, potentially millennia, storing the carbon dioxide away from the atmosphere. Initial estimates imply that the biochar as a carbon sink might permanently bind 10% of human-produced CO2 in arable soil.