Tag: carolingian empire

  • Charles the Bald: King of the Franks and Emperor of the West

    Charles the Bald: King of the Franks and Emperor of the West

    Charles II the Bald (823–877)  was King of the Franks (843–877) and later Emperor of the West (875–877). He was the son of Louis I the Pious and the grandson of Emperor Charlemagne. With the help of his brother Louis the German, he defeated his older brother Lothair at the Battle of Fontenoy in Puisaye (841) and signed the Treaty of Verdun (843) with them, becoming King of West Francia. The reign of Charles the Bald was marked by Viking invasions, Franco-Germanic wars, and the rise of feudalism. After the death of Emperor Louis II (875), he received the imperial crown and acquired Provence. During the ceremony in 877, he is said to have had his head shaved as a sign of submission to the Church, earning his nickname “the Bald.”

    Key Facts about Charles the Bald

    • Born: 13 June 823
    • Died: 6 October 877
    • Title: King of West Francia (843–877), Holy Roman Emperor (875–877)
    • Dynasty: Carolingian
    • Parents: Louis the Pious and Judith of Bavaria
    • Spouse: Ermentrude of Orléans

    He was a significant patron of the Carolingian Renaissance, fostering learning, arts, and culture at his court.

    Charles the Bald: King of West Francia

    Born in Frankfurt am Main in 823, Charles the Bald was the son of Louis I the Pious (himself the son of Charlemagne) and his second wife, Judith of Bavaria. Appointed at a young age as Duke of Alemannia, he became King of Aquitaine and received numerous territories in West Francia from his father.

    buy Inderal online in the best USA pharmacy https://health.infoblobuy.com/ no prescription with fast delivery drugstore

    Upon Louis the Pious’ death in 840, Charles and his brother, Louis II the German, rebelled against their eldest brother Lothair I, the designated heir of the Empire. In 842, they pledged mutual support through the Oaths of Strasbourg. These oaths are likely the first treaties formulated in the “vulgar” language, meaning in both Romance and Germanic tongues.

    This fraternal union allowed the succession war to end the following year with a treaty, the Treaty of Verdun, which divided the Empire into three kingdoms. Charles received West Francia, the western part of the Empire, to the west of the Meuse, Saône, and Cévennes. However, in 855, Lothair died, and a new conflict arose between Charles II, his brother Louis, and the sons of the deceased. Louis proclaimed himself King of West Francia and accused his brother Charles of leaving the kingdom in the hands of the Vikings. Charles, exiled in Burgundy, managed to gather an army and expel Louis from his kingdom. He later reconciled with his brother and regained his title as king.

    The subsequent territorial division favored Charles, who expanded his kingdom by acquiring Provence and part of Lotharingia, shared with his brother. In 875, after the death of Emperor Louis II, the last son of Lothair, Charles II, supported by Pope John VIII, had himself crowned Emperor of the West in Rome on Christmas Day.

    buy celexa online https://patersoncounseling.org/pccboard/html/celexa.html no prescription pharmacy

    In the following month, January 876, he obtained the title of King of the Lombards.

    The division of the empire was not peaceful, and Charles often clashed with his brothers over territory. He formed alliances and waged wars with both Lothair I and Louis the German throughout his reign. His relationship with his nephews, such as Louis II of Italy, was also strained.

    buy Revatio online in the best USA pharmacy https://infoblobuy.com/ no prescription with fast delivery drugstore

    A Reign Marked by the Beginnings of Feudalism

    Charles the Bald as depicted in the Vivian Bible, c. 845
    Charles the Bald as depicted in the Vivian Bible, c. 845

    During his reign, Charles II had to deal with the insecurity caused by attacks from the Normans, who landed on the coasts, sailed up the rivers, and pillaged cities (such as Rouen, Bordeaux, Paris, and Tours), as well as attacks from Muslims in the Rhône Valley. These invasions led to the consolidation—foretelling feudalism—of large territorial entities led by hereditary chiefs.

    buy cialis black online https://patersoncounseling.org/pccboard/html/cialis-black.html no prescription pharmacy

    With the support of the Church and his advisor Hincmar, Charles II worked to continue Charlemagne’s efforts to preserve the country’s religious culture. He also sought to organize his kingdom by establishing the heredity of offices (the honores) through the Capitulary of Quierzy (877). This essential text sheds light on the nature of royal power and the evolution of vassalage, as well as comital and episcopal offices.

    buy arimidex online https://patersoncounseling.org/pccboard/html/arimidex.html no prescription pharmacy

    A compromise between the king and the aristocracy, this agreement did not suffice to pacify their relations: as soon as Charles left, a noble revolt led by Count Boso broke out.

    One of Charles’ most notable acts was the Capitulary of Quierzy, issued in 877, which granted hereditary rights to the nobility in West Francia. This document is seen as a significant step in the development of feudalism, as it allowed nobles to pass their lands and titles to their heirs, reducing the king’s direct control over them.

    The Death of Charles the Bald

    Illumination representing Charles the Bald before 869
    Illumination representing Charles the Bald before 869

    The emperor did not have time to counter the rebels. Charles II died in the Alps on October 6, 877, during a campaign against the son of Louis the German, Carloman. His own son, Louis II the Stammerer, succeeded him as king, but the imperial throne remained vacant until 881, when Charles III the Fat was crowned.

  • Holy Roman Empire: Summary and History

    Holy Roman Empire: Summary and History

    Founded in 962 by Otto I, the Holy Roman Empire was a political union of states in Western and Central Europe (initially the kingdoms of Germany, Italy, and Burgundy). Built on the ruins of the Carolingian Empire, it emerged from the desire to resurrect the Western Roman Empire, which had fallen in 476. Spanning from the end of the Early Middle Ages to the beginning of the modern era, this complex entity evolved significantly over the centuries. Under the reign of Charles V, the religious unity of the Holy Roman Empire was shattered by Martin Luther’s Protestant Reformation. This led to religious conflict, culminating in the devastating Thirty Years’ War.

    After losing much of its influence, the elective monarchy did not survive the Napoleonic Wars. Facing Napoleon Bonaparte, Francis II renounced his title as Emperor of the Romans. On August 6, 1806, after more than 800 years of existence, the Holy Roman Empire disappeared. It left behind a cultural and political legacy shared by many modern countries. This period is also known as the First Reich.

    Who Founded the Holy Roman Empire?

    When the Western Roman Empire fell in 476, it was replaced by a multitude of barbarian kingdoms. In Gaul, Clovis I founded the Kingdom of the Franks, which quickly expanded toward Central and Southern Europe. The Carolingian dynasty succeeded the Merovingians, with Pepin the Short ascending to the throne in 751. Under his son, Charles I, known as Charlemagne, the Carolingian Empire reached its peak. Determined to revive the ancient Roman Empire, the King of the Franks embarked on a campaign to conquer Europe.

    By the end of 800, the monarch was crowned Emperor of the West by Pope Leo III in Rome—a first in three centuries! After the Treaty of Verdun in 843, the Carolingian Empire was divided among three of Charlemagne’s grandsons. Charles the Bald inherited West Francia (the future France), Louis the German received East Francia, and Lothair was given Middle Francia and the imperial title. This marked the end of Charlemagne’s unified empire, which officially ceased to exist in 924 after the assassination of Berengar I. The imperial title remained vacant until the coronation of Otto I, King of Germany, who created the Holy Roman Empire in 962.

    What Are the Dates of the Holy Roman Empire?

    A political union of states in Western, Central, and Southern Europe, the Holy Roman Empire lasted from 962 to 1806, disappearing at the dawn of the modern era. Initially, the Holy Roman Empire encompassed territories of the former East and South Francia, including the Kingdom of Germany, Bohemia, and Italy. By 1032, the Kingdom of Burgundy had joined the empire. Modeled after Charlemagne’s empire, Otto’s dream was to restore the Roman Empire on the remnants of the Carolingian realm.

    At its height, it covered much of Central Europe, including modern-day Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and parts of France and Italy. By the 18th century, however, the regional influence of the Holy Roman Empire had waned in favor of Prussia. It finally collapsed during the Napoleonic Wars. After the signing of the Confederation of the Rhine treaty, Francis II renounced his title as Emperor of the Romans on August 6, 1806, marking the end of the First German Reich.

    What Was the Empire Like During the Middle Ages?

    The Ottonian dynasty ruled the Holy Roman Empire from 962 until the death of Henry II in 1024. During this period, the empire prospered, developing a thriving merchant economy. Close to the Church, Otto and his descendants dreamed of uniting all of Christian Europe under one empire. To strengthen their authority, they ensured the loyalty of many bishops through the “imperial clientele” system. Christianity played a central role in the Holy Roman Empire during the Middle Ages.

    The Church was a privileged partner of the rulers and formed the backbone of the imperial administration, serving as a counterbalance to secular powers. The Ottonians were succeeded by the Salian dynasty, which reigned from 1027 to 1125 and worked to preserve peace. With the decline of the Hohenstaufens in the 13th century, central authority weakened, while the power of the prince-electors grew. By the end of the Middle Ages, the Holy Roman Empire had shrunk to mainly German territories and abandoned its universal ambitions. In 1452, the imperial title passed to the House of Habsburg.

    How Was the Empire During the Modern Era?

    Under the reign of the Habsburgs, the Holy Roman Empire experienced a revival and regained influence. In 1495, Maximilian I undertook a profound reform of the elective monarchy. Between 1517 and 1570, the empire faced Martin Luther’s Protestant Reformation, which tested its unity. The Peace of Augsburg, signed on September 25, 1555, suspended hostilities between Catholic and Protestant states. At the end of the 16th century, the process of confessionalization began, which solidified the divide between Lutheranism, Calvinism, and Catholicism.

    In 1618, tensions between the two camps escalated, marking the start of the Thirty Years’ War. The conflict ended with the signing of the Peace of Westphalia on October 24, 1648. Ratified by the various belligerents, these treaties deeply reshaped the political and religious balance across Europe. From 1740 onward, Prussia and Austria emerged on the European stage, and their rivalry intensified. In the face of these rising powers, the Holy Roman Empire gradually faded, continuing its inexorable decline…

    What Was the Constitution Like Under the Holy Roman Empire?

    The Holy Roman Empire was governed by a set of laws and customs, many of which were inherited from the Middle Ages. Over the centuries, the elective monarchy established a number of institutions to ensure its functioning. Among them were the Imperial Diet, the Imperial Circles, the Imperial Chamber Court, the Aulic Council, and the Imperial Estates. These entities designated the individuals and corporations eligible to sit in the Imperial Diet.

    The constitution of the Holy Roman Empire was largely based on written and unwritten legal foundations, some of which held the status of fundamental laws. This was the case with the Golden Bull of 1356 and the Diet of Worms in 1495. Other examples include the Peace of Augsburg in 1555 and the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. In the modern era, despite his status, the King of the Romans held little actual power. To implement effective policies, he had to collaborate with the seven prince-electors, who had the privilege of electing the emperor. These electors would play a major role in the empire’s politics until the end of the Thirty Years’ War.

    What Were the Flags and Symbols Related to the Holy Roman Empire?

    Upon his coronation in 962, Otto I adopted the eagle as his emblem, a symbol of imperial power dating back to the Roman Empire. However, it wasn’t until the 12th century that the eagle truly became the figure of the elective monarchy. It was replaced by a double-headed eagle in the 14th century, which soon became the dominant figure in imperial heraldry. The most famous flag of the Holy Roman Empire featured a black eagle on a gold background. During the Crusades, this was often accompanied by a red flag with a white cross.

    Many cities adopted the eagle symbol in their coats of arms, signifying the allegiance of their population to the emperor. In addition to these heraldic symbols, the elected sovereign also had a collection of ceremonial regalia: the imperial regalia. Among these consecrated objects, some dating back to Charlemagne, were the imperial crown, the scepter, and the imperial orb. Other notable items included the Holy Lance, the sword, the imperial blade, and the coronation mantle.

    What Did Charles V Do During the Holy Roman Empire?

    Charles V, often known as Charles Quint, was emperor of the Holy Roman Empire from 1520 to 1556. King of Spain from 1516, he inherited the possessions of the Habsburg family upon his father’s death. He became the most powerful monarch of the first half of the 16th century. His reign was marked by wars against Suleiman the Magnificent’s Ottoman Empire and against France, under Francis I. However, he primarily had to deal with the Protestant Reformation, which threatened to fracture the unity of the Holy Roman Empire.

    buy flagyl online http://miamihealth.com/jarrod/html/flagyl.html no prescription pharmacy

    In the spring of 1521, he condemned Martin Luther at the Diet of Worms. This did not prevent a religious war that lasted until the Peace of Augsburg was signed on September 25, 1555.

    buy ventolin inhaler online https://resmedfoundation.org/documents/pdf/ventolin-inhaler.html no prescription pharmacy

    This treaty ended hostilities between Lutheran and Catholic states and officially recognized the presence of Protestantism in the empire, signaling the end of religious unity. Faced with this bitter failure and setbacks against both France and the Ottomans, Charles V abdicated in 1556. He handed over his imperial title to his younger brother Ferdinand I and retired to Spain.

    What Were the Consequences of the Holy Roman Empire?

    The dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire during the Napoleonic Wars reshaped the geopolitical map of Europe. On July 12, 1806, sixteen German states founded the Confederation of the Rhine and seceded. After the Congress of Vienna in 1815, these states regrouped into the German Confederation. Some, primarily those established by Napoleon Bonaparte, were dissolved, allowing Prussia to gain territories. Prussia then emerged as a major power in Central Europe, eventually leading to the formation of the German Empire in 1871.

    Before relinquishing his title as Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, Francis II became Emperor of Austria. This decision led to the creation of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1867, which, like the German Empire, disappeared after World War I. Over nearly 1,000 years of history, the Holy Roman Empire left behind a significant political and cultural legacy. This common heritage, shared by many current nations, remains an integral part of the European construction.

    Key Dates of the Roman Empire

    September 4, 476 – Fall of the Western Roman Empire

    Since 455, the Roman Empire has seen a chaotic succession of emperors due to coups. After assassinating Julius Nepos, General Orestes places his son, Romulus Augustulus, on the throne. Less than a year later, the young boy is deposed by the barbarian leader Odoacer. Unlike his father, who is executed, the boy is spared and exiled. Odoacer, then king of the Heruli, becomes the new ruler of Italy. After a slow decline, the fragmented Western Roman Empire, which had been weakening since the 4th century, disappears on September 4, 476.

    843 – The Belgian territory divided by the Treaty of Verdun

    Following the treaty, the territory is divided between Francia and Lotharingia. Flanders in the north goes to Charles the Bald, while Wallonia is integrated into Lothaire I’s territories. However, these lands will later be part of the Holy Roman Empire a few years later.

    February 2, 962 – Otto I crowned emperor

    In peril due to the powerful Roman aristocratic families, the Papal States once again require external assistance. Otto I of Germany comes to their aid and is crowned Emperor of the Romans by Pope John XII in exchange for his protection. From that moment, the Papal States fall once again under imperial control. Otto I becomes the first ruler of the Holy Roman Empire, a territory that includes both Germany and Italy.

    January 25, 1077 – Henry IV confesses at Canossa

    Amidst the Investiture Controversy, Henry IV, King of the Romans, travels to Canossa to kneel before the pope and beg for forgiveness. Having been excommunicated the previous year, his legitimacy as emperor is threatened by rebellious German princes. He waits for three days for the pope’s response, who finally agrees to lift the excommunication.

    buy amoxil online https://bereniceelectrolysis.com/jquery/js/amoxil.html no prescription pharmacy

    Humiliated, Henry IV soon embarks on a campaign to conquer Rome and is excommunicated once again.

    February 11, 1229 – Frederick II signs the Treaty of Jaffa

    To honor his promise to the pope, Frederick II, emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, embarks on the Sixth Crusade in 1228. Very brief, it ends with the signing of the Treaty of Jaffa on February 11, 1229. Sultan Al-Kamil returns Jerusalem, Bethlehem, and Nazareth to the Italian ruler. In return, Frederick agrees not to take control of Islamic holy sites.

    buy prednisone online http://miamihealth.com/jarrod/html/prednisone.html no prescription pharmacy

    On March 18, 1229, Frederick II crowns himself King of Jerusalem before returning to Europe. His methods provoke hostility from parts of Christendom.

    July 17, 1245 – Pope Innocent IV deposes Frederick II

    While the struggle between the Papacy and the Holy Empire continues, Innocent IV, exiled in Lyon, convenes the 13th Ecumenical Council. In front of the assembly, he deposes the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, Frederick II of Hohenstaufen. For several years, Frederick had been trying to assert his authority over all of Italy. The conflict grows considerably, especially in the confrontation between temporal power and spiritual authority. Following this event, Frederick II faces several revolts and conspiracies, eventually dying suddenly in 1250. His death brings an end to the struggle between the Papacy and the empire, from which the papacy emerges stronger.

    buy methocarbamol online https://bereniceelectrolysis.com/jquery/js/methocarbamol.html no prescription pharmacy

    January 21, 1398 – Death of Frederick V of Nuremberg

    Born 65 years earlier, Frederick V of Nuremberg dies on January 21, 1398. The son of John II of Nuremberg and Elisabeth of Henneberg, Frederick V succeeded his father as burgrave of Nuremberg, Bayreuth, and Ansbach in 1357. He spent part of his life defending the Nuremberg Castle, a strategic stronghold for the Holy Roman Empire.

    January 18, 1701 – Birth of the Kingdom of Prussia

    After receiving Emperor Leopold I, Frederick III, then Elector of Prussia, crowns himself in Königsberg and establishes his capital in Berlin. This marks the birth of the Kingdom of Prussia within the Holy Roman Empire. When the empire falls due to Napoleon’s conquests, it is the Kingdom of Prussia that will rise to prominence, reaching its peak at the end of the 19th century and achieving German unification.

    August 6, 1806 – End of the Holy Roman Empire

    The Holy Roman Empire is dissolved when Francis II of Habsburg renounces the imperial crown. This empire, founded by Otto I in 962, initially encompassed the kingdoms of Germany, Italy, and Burgundy. It lost many of its territories over the centuries and could not withstand Napoleon’s conquests. Francis then takes the title of Emperor of Austria and gives his daughter, Marie-Louise, in marriage to Napoleon.

  • Pepin the Short’s Height: How Tall Was Pepin the Short Really?

    Pepin the Short’s Height: How Tall Was Pepin the Short Really?

    How tall was Pepin the Short? Pepin III (714–768), often known as Pepin the Younger, was a major figure in early medieval Europe. From 751 until 768, he ruled as king of the Franks and was instrumental in founding the Carolingian dynasty. Charlemagne and the Carolingian Empire owe much to the stability that Pepin established in Western Europe. The mystery surrounding Pepin’s height and the question of how tall Pepin the Short was is still a mystery without concrete evidence.

    And the earliest evidence regarding Pepin III being called “the Short” actually comes from the 11th century, two centuries after his death.

    Curiosity Regarding Pepin the Short’s Height

    pepin the short height: Würzburg, Alte Mainbrücke, statue Pepin the Short.
    Würzburg, Alte Mainbrücke, statue Pepin the Short. (Dguendel, CC BY 4.0)

    The disparity between Pepin the Short’s moniker and the successes of his reign has led many to speculate about the king’s actual height. His influence on the Frankish realm and the later Carolingian reign makes Pepin the Short’s real height intriguing.

    But the reality is that, over the course of history, many notable people have been given illustrative titles and descriptions that did not accurately represent their actual status. For instance, we know that Napoleon’s height was inaccurately described as short, but it was just his towering soldiers who surrounded him all the time.

    Considering the contradiction of Pepin III’s moniker “the Short”, you might be wondering if there are any hard proofs or reputable sources that might shed light on Pepin the Short’s height.

    The short answer is no. How tall Pepin the Short was is not known. But if we had to speculate based on the average height of the time, Pepin the Short’s height could be less than 5 feet 7 inches (170 cm).

    But there is more to this story.

    Lack of Historical Records

    pepin the short (pepin iii) fights animals in arena with his short height
    A drawing of Pepin the Short by J.-E. Buschmann, 1845.

    The lack of reliable historical sources from the 8th century makes it difficult to learn about Pepin the Short’s physicality, such as his height. Physical descriptions of people in historical records from this time, such as their height, are sketchy at best.

    Rather than focusing on the personal details of their kings, chroniclers of the time recorded the major political events, military operations, accomplishments, genealogical lineage, and problems with the reigns. Recording the height of ancient and medieval figures was never a common practice.

    Due to its relative insignificance, the height of the medieval kings and queens was seldom addressed or documented in these accounts. This is also true when it comes to Charlemagne’s height as the son of Pepin the Short. The nature of these chronicles contributes to the lack of facts concerning Pepin the Short’s height today.

    But you can always make educational guesses:

    Theories and Speculations on How Tall Pepin Was

    pepin the short fights bull and lion
    1912 drawing of Pepin the Short, fighting a bull and a lion. (Source)

    Why was Pepin called the Short? Numerous historians and academics have spoken on the subject of Pepin the Short’s height, each with their own theory and opinion. The following are the most widely held beliefs and speculations about how tall Pepin the Short was:

    Theory One: He Was Just Shorter

    Pepin III might be given the nickname “the Short” because he was obviously shorter than other people of his day. We know for a fact that following the Norman Conquest in 1066, the average height of a man living at the end of the early medieval period was around 5 feet, 7.7 inches (172 cm). Today, this figure is around 5 feet 11 inches (180 cm).

    Let’s say even if Pepin’s height was around the 5 feet 7 inches (170 cm) mark, that would still be enough to name the king “the Short”.

    Theory Two: He Was Just Relatively Shorter

    However, the same hypothesis also points to the fact that many members of the Frankish aristocracy were quite tall and intimidating, suggesting that the word “short” might just be a relative term in relation to Pepin’s family.

    This theory assumes that Pepin the Short was probably of ordinary height for his period but seemed smaller compared to his ancestors. Considering Charlemagne’s tall height of 6 feet and 0.5 inches (1.84 meters), this approach holds some weight. Because Charlemagne was considered a giant at the time.

    Pepin was the son of Charles Martel, who in 732 led the French to victory against the invading Muslims at the Battle of Tours. And Charles Martel is never described for his short stature. It is also possible that he was taller than his son, Pepin.

    Theory Three: A Misunderstanding of His Latinized Name

    During the Middle Ages, kings often derived Latinized versions of their names to emphasize their connection to the Roman Empire. The name Pepin was also known as Pippin and Peppin, and the Latinized version of this name would be Pippinus, Pipinus, and Pepinus.

    Since the word “Pippinus” meant “little Pippin” or “young Pippin” in Latin, Pepin’s moniker “the Short” might have been a misreading of his Latinized name.

    Theory Four: A Shift in Wording

    Pepin the Short, pepin iii, or pepin the younger
    (W. Commons)

    Since Charlemagne’s father, great-grandfather (Pepin of Herstal), and great-great-great-grandfather (Pepin of Landen), as well as two of his sons, all had the same name (Pepin), it became essential to give each branch of the Carolingian Pepin family a unique moniker.

    Pepin of Herstal, the grandfather of Pepin the Short, was called “brevis,” which means “short” in Latin. And the earliest evidence regarding Pepin III being called “the Short” actually comes from the 11th century, two centuries after his death.

    According to one theory, the word “minor” (as used by the Young) has been replaced with “brevis” and then “parvus” in time, which simply meant “short.”

    Long after Pepin’s death, in the late 9th century, the monk Notker Balbulus wrote a little treatise on the lives of Pepin and Charlemagne. Pepin the Hunchback, the illegitimate oldest son of Charlemagne, is mentioned.

    The contemporary historian Einhard, the author of the Vita Karoli, depicts this son as handsome but hunched-back. Using Einhard’s story, Notker also mentions that he, too, had a hunchback but includes the observation that he was a dwarf.

    “Pippin himself, a dwarf and a hunchback, was cruelly scourged, tonsured, and sent for some time as a punishment to the monastery of Saint Gall; the poorest, it was judged, and the straitest in all the emperor’s broad dominions.”

    Early Lives of Charlemagne by Eginhard and the Monk of St. Gall, edited by Prof. A. J. Grant – Gutenberg.org

    Theory Five: He Ruled for Too Short

    An alternative theory proposes a distinct sense of the word “Short.” Some historians disagree on whether the nickname was meant to reflect Pepin’s small stature or the short duration of his rule. Pepin III ruled from 751 until his death in 768, a period of 17 years.

    While 17 years of reign may not be that short, his son Charlemagne ruled for 46 years, and this was around the typical length of a king’s rule for the day.

    Therefore, calling him “Short” might be a way to draw attention to the fact that he was the first monarch of the Carolingian dynasty. His dynasty would be linked to Charlemagne in later history.

    Visual Representations of Pepin the Short

    Pepin the Short is not shown in any contemporary artwork. All the creative representations of him have been made after his death. Since there aren’t many historical paintings or sculptures from the 8th century, even fewer paintings show Pepin explicitly.

    Only some later works attempted to depict Pepin the Short’s height. Some medieval manuscripts show him towering above his contemporaries, but they were probably intended to convey a sense of his superiority. At the same time, some later paintings tended to minimize Pepin’s height, perhaps owing to his moniker.

    Who Was Pepin the Short?

    King of the Franks from 751 to 768, Pepin III was also known as Pepin the Short. He founded the Carolingian dynasty and was Charlemagne’s father. He was the son of Charles Martel, who in 732 led the French to victory against the invading Muslims at the Battle of Tours. St. Boniface’s mission to convert the Saxons and reform the Frankish church had his backing.

    In Italy, he helped the church defeat the Lombards and give them territories that would later become the Papal States. In 754, Pope Stephen II anointed him. In 768, he passed away, and his remains were moved to the Basilica of St. Denis.

    Despite being one of the most important European kings in history, having a predecessor and a successor nicknamed “the Great” (Charlemagne) and “the Hammer” (Charles Martel) while he was referred to as “the Short” didn’t help the popularity of Pepin III in history.

    Fun Fact

    His name in French, Pépin le Bref, is associated with the expression “bref, comme dirait Pépin,” which roughly translates to “well, as Pépin would say.” In this context, “bref” means “short,” giving rise to the humorous connection between Pepin’s nickname and the expression.

    References

    1. Early Lives of Charlemagne by Eginhard and the Monk of St Gall Edited by Einhard and Notker Balbulus, Gutenberg.org
    2. The Franks, from their first appearance in history to the death of King Pepin – By Walter Copland Perry · 1857
    3. The History of Charlemagne By George Payne Rainsford James · 1832