Tag: napoleon bonaparte

  • Napoleon’s Horse: The Legendary Marengo

    Napoleon’s Horse: The Legendary Marengo

    One of Napoleon Bonaparte‘s favorite horses was called Marengo. This gray and white Arabian stallion would have been named after the June 1800 Battle of Marengo, in which Napoleon barely beat an Austrian army in Italy. Napoleon had seized this gray-white horse in Egypt in 1799 and brought it to France. However, very little information is available regarding the Marengo horse, and some historians question the horse’s existence or think it probably had a different name.

    Marengo had the battle marks of having been ridden by Napoleon at many battles. The horse was injured when he was caught by the English, yet he made it through many years.

    The Story of Napoleon’s Horse: Marengo

    Napoleon's horse Marengo, an Arabian stallion by Antoine-Jean Gros, 1803.
    Napoleon’s horse Marengo, an Arabian stallion by Antoine-Jean Gros, 1803.

    Marengo was born in 1794, captured at the Battle of Abukir during the Egyptian campaign of 1799 from the well-known El Naseri Stud by Napoleon’s men, and brought to France in the same year. The horse was of small size, approximately 4 feet 7 inches (1.40 meters) at the withers, with a light gray or iron gray coat.

    It would have taken Marengo five hours at a gallop to cross the 80 miles (130 km) from Burgos to Valladolid, and he could have gone the 50 miles (80 km) from Vienna to Semmering without stopping for food.

    However, contrary to popular belief, Napoleon did not actually ride Marengo during the Battle of Marengo. The horse was maintained at the stable so that he could use it whenever he wanted.

    Along with more than 50 horses from Napoleon’s private stud farm, Marengo is also said to have made it out of Russia in 1812. Similarly, he did not appear to take part in the disastrous 1812 Russian campaign.

    This stallion was probably stabled in Normandy at the time. The horse was restored to the Tuileries stables in 1815, after Napoleon returned to Paris from captivity on Elba in March.

    Napoleon horse Marengo, painting by Ernest Meissonier, 1862
    Napoleon riding Marengo, painting by Ernest Meissonier, 1862. Image: Onedio.

    Marengo was then supposedly present during the Battle of Waterloo in June. But you can also rule out the possibility of Napoleon ever riding a horse named Marengo in this battle. Because Napoleon’s only horse that day was a mare named Desirée, after his brief fiancée, Desirée Clary (1777–1860), who went on to become Queen of Sweden and Norway.

    After Napoleon’s defeat at the Battle of Waterloo, this 22-year-old steed, which Napoleon allegedly rode during the battle, was captured at Napoleon’s Last HQ (Caillou Farm) on the evening of June 18, 1815.

    While a British officer was caring for a horse in the imperial stables, he surmised from the equipment and the branded letter “N” on the horse’s skin that the horse belonged to the imperial riding stable. The horse was shot in the tail and suffered from the scars of five other battle wounds.

    Napoleon on horseback at the Battle of Waterloo, June 18th, 1815. (Colored by Malevus)
    Napoleon on horseback at the Battle of Waterloo, June 18th, 1815. (Source: Washington Post. Colorized by Malevus)

    He was brought to England by William Petre (11th Baron Petre), and after being purchased at auction by Lieutenant-Colonel of the Grenadiers John Julius Angerstein, Napoleon’s horse was transported to Angerstein’s horse farm on the Isle of Ely in Cambridgeshire.

    Others maintain that Marengo was captured by the English after being wounded at Waterloo and lived another 6–7 years once his wounds healed.

    Marengo was quite a gentle horse. After being exhibited by Captain Howard until the age of 27, it was sometimes used for breeding. Once the attempts to utilize the horse as a breeding stallion began to fail, Napoleon’s horse was retired and lived to the ripe old age of 38 before passing away in 1832 in Brandon, Suffolk, England.

    All of Marengo’s offspring, no matter the color of their mothers, were gray. The goal was to get the horse ready for mounting. But that never materialized. Napoleon was exiled to Saint Helena at the time Marengo was captured, and the General remained there until his death in 1821.

    Cultural Legacy of Marengo

    Marengo – James Ward, 1824
    Marengo – James Ward, 1824.

    Napoleomania

    This horse, falsely alleged to be the imperial “Marengo,” later proved to be a popular painting in England. Once the French emperor Napoleon was finally vanquished in 1821, a genuine “Napoleomania” swept the country.

    Thanks to Napoleon’s horse, Marengo, the once-feared general became a beloved figure in the eyes of the people through various paintings. Due in large part to the Napoleonic hysteria of the 19th century, many contemporary people automatically thought of Marengo when hearing of the horse of the French emperor.

    In 1824, the English artist James Ward (1769–1859) painted a big canvas (above) showing Marengo lounging on the sand. In this painting, the horse appears to be pining for its former master, who is currently living in exile far, far away, as it stares out into the distance towards the sinking sun.

    An Ancient Funerary Ritual

    Memento Marengo hanging over Napoleon's tomb in Dome Des Invalides.
    Memento Marengo hanging over Napoleon’s tomb in the Dome Des Invalides. (Image: Anne-Sylvane Marre-Noël)

    The Musée de l’Armée (The Army Museum) commissioned Pascal Convert to create a piece for the royal chapel Dôme des Invalides commemorating the bicentennial of Napoleon Bonaparte’s death for their “Napoléon? Encore!” contemporary art exhibition.

    The artist used a 3D scan to build a composite copy of the Marengo skeleton called Memento Marengo, which served as a modern Memento mori by hanging over the grave of the Emperor. Reuniting Napoleon with his horse resembled an ancient funerary ritual in which combatants were buried with their mounts.

    The horse’s position was reminiscent of Pegasus, the horse who accompanied the demigod Bellerophon on his flight and fall after he attempted to ascend Mount Olympus and received punishment from Zeus. Similarly, Napoleon formally surrendered on the English ship HMS Bellerophon on July 15, 1815.

    There were conflicting reactions to the sculpture; some people found its morbid connotation upsetting, while others pointed out that the Dôme des Invalides is a necropolis, not an exhibition space. However, it was planned to be down on February 13, 2022, at the time of its installation.

    In Movies

    • The character “Mr. Memory” is featured in a scene from the 1959 British film The 39 Steps in which he is challenged to name Napoleon’s horse during a variety performance.
    • The name “Marengo” appears on an unusual vehicle in the “Speed Racer” episode of Race for Revenge from 1967. But Speed Racer makes the connection between the name and the horse after the riddle is solved. However, the name Marengo was poorly translated from Japanese to English as Melange by the ‘uncultured’ Trans-Lux Corporation.
    • “The world’s first epistolary equine love story,” Warhorses of Letters (2011) (broadcast on BBC Radio 4) features Stephen Fry as Marengo and Daniel Rigby as Copenhagen. It is a comic correspondence between the Duke of Wellington’s horse and Napoleon’s horse.

    Did Marengo Really Exist?

    Skeleton of Marengo as seen in London, 2011.
    The skeleton of Marengo as seen in London, 2011. Source: CC BY-SA 3.0 – Nick-D – Wikipedia

    There is a skeleton that has been alleged to be the famed Marengo horse on exhibit at London’s National Army Museum in Chelsea. However, can we truly be certain that this is Marengo? What can be said with validity is that Napoleon rode at least 150 horses in his lifetime. His secretary, Agathon Jean-François Fain, remarked that it was an occasional spectacle to see Napoleon ride:

    “He [Napoleon] rode recklessly and dangerously. He hunched forward in the saddle, holding the reins loose in his right hand while leaving his left arm free and moving his whole body to the horse’s rhythm.”

    Agathon Jean-François Fain

    The list of Napoleon’s horses is, at best, incomplete. Strangely, the name of the illustrious Marengo does not exist in the records of the imperial stables or any other French archives, despite his widespread fame. In her exhaustive study of “Marengo: The Myth of Napoleon’s Horse,” Australian author Jill Hamilton suggests that “Ali,” not “Marengo,” must be the official name of the horse.

    Marengo in the Museum

    Derek Bell, a conservator, cleaning up the bones of Napoleon's horse, Marengo.
    Derek Bell, a conservator, cleaning up the bones of Napoleon’s horse, Marengo. (Image: Credit: Phil Yeomans/BNPS)

    The National Army Museum in London is where modern audiences may marvel at the skeleton of Marengo. Marengo’s hide was lost over time, and only the bones were left. However, the skeleton also lacks at least two hooves.

    General Angerstein is reported to have been given one of the animal’s hind hooves, while each of his front hooves has been turned into a snuffbox or ashtray and displayed separately: one at Saint James’s Palace in London and the other at the Household Cavalry Museum after being discovered on the farm where Marengo died.

    Marengo’s skeleton was cleaned up and repaired in 2017. National Army Museum staff felt this was necessary because the animal had been displayed in an unprofessional manner since the 19th century.

    Napoleon’s Last Horse: Vizir

    The Vizir before its restoration in the Paris, The Army Museum.
    The Vizir before its restoration in the Paris, Army Museum. Source: CC BY-SA 3.0 – Sesamevoila – Wikipedia

    Vizir (‘Advisor’), Napoleon’s last horse, has been preserved in a stuffed state for posterity. It was in 1805 that the Sultan of Ottoman (Turkey), Selim III, presented the French emperor with this white Arabian thoroughbred as a gift. For a period of 10 years, Napoleon had the animal at his side; he rode it in Prussia at the Battle of Jena–Auerstedt (1806), the Battle of Eylau (1807), and the Battle of Wagram (1809).

    After Napoleon’s death, Vizir was sent to St. Helena and groomed there. The horse is currently on display in Paris’ Army Museum. On its left thigh, you can make out a crowned “N.”

    But there are concerns about this horse as well. Few people are convinced that this is the same horse that Napoleon rode in those famous wars. The French Army Museum is fairly confident that this horse is Vizir; nonetheless, a notice in the exhibit reads “Si c’est bien lui” (If it is him).

    Other Horses Rode by Napoleon

    napoleon horse marengo: Bonaparte's passage of the Great St. Bernard, painted by Jacques-Louis David (1748--1825) in 1801. The horse in the picture is "Marengo."
    Bonaparte’s passage of the Great St. Bernard, painted by Jacques-Louis David (1748–1825) in 1801. The horse in the picture is “Marengo.”
    • Intendant – On Elba, Napoleon lavished extra care on his favorite display horse, a cream gene-colored Anglo-Norman, also known as “Coco”.
    • Marie – According to legend, Napoleon replaced Marengo with this mare when he was injured at Waterloo.
    • Roitelet – His ancestry most likely included both the English and the French. He dismounted Napoleon in the middle of a troop parade. He was not utilized by Napoleon again until Marengo was allegedly wounded in the Russian campaign. Roitelet was injured but later transferred to Elba.
    • Tauris – Alexander I of Russia generously provided this white mare as a gift. Napoleon appreciated its attractiveness and brought it with him to the Russian campaign. They both returned to Elba together.
    • Vizir – Another one of Napoleon Bonaparte’s war horses was named Vizir.
    • Wagram – A gray Arabian horse known for its beauty.

    List of horses of Napoleon

    The list of horses of Napoleon in alphabetical order:

    • Aboukir
    • Aly, iron gray, 1812
    • Arabella
    • Artaxercés
    • Austerlitz
    • Babylonien
    • Baladière, mouse gray, 1811
    • Belle
    • Bouffon
    • Calvados
    • Cantal, mottled gray
    • César, dirty gray, 1808
    • Cid
    • Cléopâtre, ash gray, 1806
    • Coceyre
    • Conquérant
    • Cordoue
    • Cyrus
    • Diomède, pale gray, 1808
    • Distingué
    • Duc
    • Edile
    • Effendi
    • Emule
    • Endurant
    • Estime
    • Étrangère
    • Euphrate
    • Extrême
    • Famillier
    • Folâtre
    • Frère
    • Georgien
    • Gesner
    • Gracieux
    • Gracieux, dapple-gray, 1815
    • Grisou, spotted-gray, 1814
    • Guza
    • Hahim
    • Harbet
    • Hector
    • Helavert
    • Héricle
    • Iéna
    • Jaspé, vinous gray, 1812
    • Judith
    • Louvette
    • Lydienne
    • Lyre
    • Major
    • Marengo
    • Naïade
    • Nankin
    • Naturaliste
    • Naufragé
    • Nausicaa
    • Navigateur
    • Navire
    • Nickel, a thoroughbred Arabian with a metallic gray coat, donated by the Tsar of Russia in 1805
    • Ninon
    • Ramier, mottled gray, 1807
    • Robuste, starling gray, 1815
    • Roitelet
    • Russe
    • Sagonte
    • Sahara
    • Sélim, dirty gray, 1812
    • Styrie
    • Suez, ash gray, 1815
    • Sultan
    • Tauris
    • Timide
    • Triomphant
    • Vizir, almost white peach blossom, with all hairs, slightly trout chestnut
    • Wagram, gray

    References

    1. The Myth of Napoleon’s Horse Jill, Duchess of Hamilton.
    2. Marengo’s makeover | National Army Museum.
    3. Napoleon’s last horse given makeover by taxidermists (2016, July 3). Napoleon Bonaparte’s Last Horse to Be Restored for Second Time – ABC News.
  • Joachim Murat: Son of the Revolution and Napoleon’s Sword

    Joachim Murat: Son of the Revolution and Napoleon’s Sword

    Joachim Murat (1767-1815), one of Napoleon Bonaparte‘s marshals, was known for his bravery and extravagance. He was also king of Naples from 1808 to 1815. After rising to prominence as one of the finest swordsmen and charmers of the Napoleonic period, this innkeeper’s son ascended to the throne and married the emperor’s sister. The Enlightenment ideals he defended made him a hero to Italian nationalists fighting for the peninsula’s union. Novelists would not have dared to create a character like him for a count in the 19th century due to his extraordinary fate, panache, boldness, and terrible conclusion.

    Joachim Murat: Son of the Revolution

    Fragment of portrait of Joachim Murat,
    Fragment of portrait of Joachim Murat, Prince d’Empire, Grand Duke of Clèves and of Berg, King of Naples under the name of Napoleon in 1808 (1767-1815), Marshal of France in 1804.

    On March 25, 1767, Joachim Murat entered the world as the son of innkeepers in Labastide-Fortunière (Lot). His father, a tiny bourgeois guy, served on many occasions as consul of his town and oversaw the distribution of church funds and other public assets. Joachim, the youngest of eleven children, was always destined for a career in the church. After studying for a while at the college of Cahors, he enrolled at the seminary of Toulouse, but was dismissed in 1787 due to a dispute with a fellow student.

    Joachim joined the 12th Cuirassier Regiment of the Ardennes and was stationed in the city, preferring the military uniform over the collar of a priest. His family opposed his newfound orientation and campaigned vigorously to have him fired. Joachim remained a horseman in the company of the knight Henry de Carrière. In this new universe, Joachim served as the 12th Cuirassier Regiment of Champagne in this regiment. Joachim was a marshal of lodgings when word of the French Revolution of 1789 spread around the area. Departure from his unit and subsequent return home had been mysterious.

    In the Lot again, he settled in Saint-Céré as a trader and immediately rose to prominence, joining political organizations and being chosen to represent his canton at the Fête de la Fédération in Paris on July 14, 1791. Along with him, he brought back the Parisian municipal flag after attending the event.

    Joachim went back to his old unit as a private despite his newfound status. It wasn’t until February of the following year, 1792, that he and two other department soldiers were officially selected to join Louis XVI‘s constitutional guard. But this corps fell well short of his expectations, and in March he publicly complained about the widespread anti-patriotism he had seen there. That guard was disbanded after he wrote to the Legislative Assembly advocating for its elimination.

    Rejoining the 12th Regiment of Chasseurs, Joachim quickly rose through the ranks, first to marshal of the logis and then to second lieutenant. Between 1792 and 1793, he was a captain aide-de-camp to General d’Urre and a squadron commander in the armies of Champagne and the North.

    Bonaparte’s sword

    Murat at the Battle of Abukir, painted by Antoine-Jean Gros (1804).
    Murat at the Battle of Abukir, painted by Antoine-Jean Gros (1804).

    On October 5, 1795, when royalist groups marched on the Convention in Paris, he was there. At the time, he was serving under the direction of a brigadier general named Bonaparte, who gave him this directive: “Do it swiftly, and with a sabre if you have to!” As the first step in a lengthy partnership, Murat enthusiastically carried out the general’s orders and returned the instruments of his triumph to him. After being promoted to brigade commander in 1796, he served as Bonaparte’s aide-de-camp in Italy.

    After making a name for himself at Dego and Mondovi, he and Junot were tasked with transporting captured enemy flags back to Paris. He returned to Italy, where he was discovered in Genoa and Livorno, on the Adige River, in the Tyrol. On September 15, while marching towards Mantoue, he was slightly wounded. General Bonaparte’s reputation as a skilled horseman was already established by the time he ended the Italian war with the Treaty of Compo-Formio. In 1797, he was in Rome while the Roman Republic was being proclaimed.

    Faithful to Bonaparte, Murat was part of the Egyptian expedition. In this fantastical country, he cultivated his reputation as a swordsman since he had no interest in scientific advancements. All the major engagements were attended by him, including the landing at Alexandria, the famous battle of the Pyramids (where he did not play a major role), the battle of Gaza, the battle in front of the infamous city of Saint-Jean-d’Acre, and most notably, the Battle of Abukir, where he covered himself in glory as the commander of the army’s vanguard. As a result of his daring attack, the Turks were driven back into the water.

    Bonaparte was pleased to be able to replace the memory of the naval failure at Aboukir with that of the land triumph of the same name when the Anglo-Turkish invasion plan failed. Murat was promoted to major general on the battlefield on July 25, 1799, in recognition of his victory.

    When he returned to France, he was there at Bonaparte’s side for the 18 Brumaire coup (9 and 10 November 1799). As the situation deteriorated in the Council of Five Hundred, President Lucien Bonaparte called for the delegates’ dismissal. The general marched into the Council chamber with his grenadiers, yelled, “Citizens, you are dissolved!” and then, in response to the deputies’ commotion, commanded his soldiers, “Get all these people out of here!” The deputies’ side saw a mass exodus as people rushed for the doors and windows. Eventually, Lucien would muster enough support to vote for the collapse of the Directory and the beginning of the Consulate, which would result in Bonaparte assuming control of the government.

    Caroline Bonaparte and her children
    Caroline Bonaparte and her children.

    Murat was at Bonaparte’s side throughout the riots of Vendémiaire, Italy, Egypt, and Brumaire, and he saved the Emperor’s life on more than one occasion. To deny the flamboyant swordsman the hand of his sister, who was obviously head over heels in love with him, was inexcusable. Therefore, on February 20, 1800, Murat (then 33 years old) wed Caroline Bonaparte (then 18 years old) and became the son-in-law of the First Consul Napoleon.

    The young spouse remounted his horse and participated in the second Italian war. After Napoleon promoted him to lieutenant general in the head of the reserve army, he also gave him responsibility over the cavalry. Napoleon I believed that Murat’s command of such a large number of mounted troops would be an effective military asset. The commander made his way across the Great St. Bernard Pass and conquered Milan. After that, he went to Marengo to see his brother-in-law and was awarded a sabre for his efforts. After spending some time at Dijon, he headed back to his favorite battlefield—Italy—to seize Tuscany and expel the Neapolitans from the Papal States. After negotiating a peace treaty with the King of Naples, he was appointed to lead the kingdom’s Southern Observation Army. He used this opportunity to grab control of Elba.

    Joachim Murat could now return to France and join local politics since that the country was at peace. In 1804 he was elected president of the Lot’s electoral college and a delegate to the Legislative Body, which launched his rise to power. After that, he was named governor of Paris. When the Duke of Enghien scandal arose, he was in charge, yet he was willing to just sign the judgment order.

    Murat: Marshal of the Empire

    Murat at the Battle of Jena, 14 October 1806.
    Murat at the Battle of Jena, 14 October 1806.

    As the Empire was declared, Murat, who was present at the coronation, was awarded every title possible for his participation, including that of Chief of the 12th Cohort, Grand Eagle of the Legion of Honor, Grand Admiral, and Grand Prince. Important among the new aristocracy, he accumulated a collection of paintings in his private hotel at the Elysée.

    At the resumption of hostilities with Austria in 1805, Marshal Murat was promoted to head the equestrian forces. He crossed into Bavaria and then marched straight on to Vienna, where he encountered little opposition. He used deception to convince the Austrians that an armistice had been struck, allowing him to capture control of the Danube’s crossings before they were destroyed. He proceeded to seek his share of glory beneath the sun of Austerlitz after routing a Russian army in Moravia. On March 30, 1806, he was elevated to the position of Grand Duke of Berg and Cleves by imperial edict.

    Murat embraced his new position as duke seriously and moved quickly to expand his duchy by annexing places that had been returned to Prussia, most notably the castle of Wessel. Negotiating a new export tariff with Napoleon was another issue on his mind. He personally oversaw the ducal army’s clothes, ordering fabric from Damascus and picking out the colors (crimson dolmans, “doe’s belly” colored pelisses, etc.).

    However, for Murat, the war was far from done; he had to charge towards the Prussians and take part in the Battle of Jena, in which the cavalry captured 14,000 prisoners. Next, he pursued the Prince of Hohenlohe until he surrendered, at which point he was able to take Stettin with the whole might of his army (16,000 troops, 60 cannons, and as many flags). However, the destruction of Prussia did not signal the end of the war, since the Russians continued to fight.

    The prince traveled through Warsaw, Poland, while dressed in his bright and colorful attire (gold thread embroidery, wide amaranth-colored trousers with gold braid, yellow leather boots, a hat with white feathers, and a plume of four ostrich feathers with a heron egret). This city, where Poniatowski presented him with the sword of Stephen Báthory (the Polish king of the late 16th century), would be his home for the entire month of January. This country wanted nothing more than to be free, and its prince simply wanted to rule.

    However, his brother-in-law, Napoleon, had no interest in seeing Poland restored, so he braved the elements to lead his troops in the horrible and brutal Battle of Eylau. Napoleon opted to go into combat with his cavalry and asked Murat, “Will you let us be eaten by these people?” while the outcome of the conflict remained in doubt. The enemy’s center was crushed, and the French army was rescued, all because of Joachim Murat’s decision to lead the largest cavalry charge in the history of the French Empire (which prompted Balzac to write “Le colonel Chabert”). Because of Murat’s eccentric clothing, everyone was shocked when he avoided being killed on every single charge he faced.

    Murat led the attack on Eylau while dressed in a fuzzy helmet with feathers, a fur cloak, and a white leotard. Russian troops were stunned when they were defeated at Friedland, but Napoleon met the Russian Czar at Tilsit. As Murat’s extravagant attire drew attention during the celebrations, Napoleon would tell him to “Go put on your general’s uniform; you look like Franconi” (a famous theater actor).

    Joachim Murat was promoted to the rank of lieutenant general by the Emperor of Spain upon his return to the Iberian Peninsula in July 1808. He was tasked with protecting strategic Spanish outposts as a safety net for Junot’s Portuguese campaign. His first order of business was to deal with the fallout from Napoleon’s deposing King Charles IV of Spain in favor of his son, Ferdinand VII, by the “guetapens” (ambush) of Bayonne.

    The Charge of the Mamelukes, 1808 by Francisco Goya.
    The Charge of the Mamelukes, 1808 by Francisco Goya.

    The citizens of Madrid revolted and began attacking the French troops. The Mameluke inspired fear among the rebels even as they stoked the flames of their animosity, and the city was soon in flames. Murat’s harsh repression was the only way he could restore order. Francisco Goya painted this scene to commemorate the historic events of “Dos y Tres de Mayo.”

    When the Bourbon dynasty in Spain tore itself apart, the throne became available to whomever claimed it, and the Prince may have believed at that point that he had a valid claim to power in the city he had just conquered. However, this did not occur, and Joseph Bonaparte, the former king of Naples, regained control of Spain. When Murat was asked to choose between the crowns of Naples and Portugal, he chose Italy since he had previously served as a commander there.

    Murat was relieved to see Savary arrive and assume control of Spain until Joseph Bonaparte could get there. He had now reached his breaking point; he could not bear to order against the national spirit of a people, and, what’s more, he was aware that his authority was being questioned now that another monarch had been installed. As a result of his illness, Murat had been experiencing high fevers, sleeplessness, headaches, nausea, and vomiting. Taking his family to the spa waters of Burgundy in Paris, he met his buddy Lannes before he took control of his realm.

    King of Naples, Joachim Murat

    Murat as King of Naples, c. 1812
    Murat as King of Naples, c. 1812.

    King Joachim I of Naples and Sicily had widespread popular support throughout his reign. On September 6, 1808, he arrived in Naples and was greeted by the city’s triumphal arches. It’s fair to say that when his people heard that a Frenchman was arriving, they feared the worst. They saw a tall, dark-haired guy with a stellar reputation as a swordsman and ornate costumes that were spot-on for the Italian way of life enter. Whatever title Murat held in the eyes of his people, whether viceroy or grand prefect, Napoleon made it plain that Murat was only a viceroy in the eyes of him.

    But Murat misunderstood and used it as inspiration to expand his dominion. He carried on Joseph’s reforms in every area, including the establishment of a national flag and army, the easing of conscription, the founding of a polytechnic university, the introduction of civil status, the publication of a new civil code, the suppression of brigandage, the establishment of new courts of first instance, and much more.

    Murat fancied himself an Enlightenment scion. As he realized he’d be helpless against the English without a fleet, he set up a school specifically for the purpose. He also began excavations at Herculaneum, a Roman city that had been obliterated by Mount Vesuvius, and set out to improve the appearance of his capital. Murat decreased ministry subsidies, streamlined tax collection, and negotiated a drop from 5% to 3% interest on the state’s debt as a result of the dire economic circumstances and the state’s mounting debt (to the great displeasure of France).

    After the English mocked him in front of his capital, he had no choice but to expel them from Capri in October 1808. It was none other than Hudson Lowe, the future jailer of Napoleon on Saint Helena, who led the English forces.

    It was 1810, and from his throne in Naples, King Joachim I observed the Austrian alliance and Napoleon’s marriage to Marie-Louise with skepticism. It was well known that the Austrians had their own opinions on Italy and backed the Bourbons in Naples, despite the latter’s questionable legality. Murat’s association with Italian nationalist groups was a subtle but effective way for him to further his personal objectives. For the sake of his people, on June 14, 1811, he issued an edict mandating the naturalization of all aliens who were receiving financial benefits from civil service jobs. In retaliation, Napoleon declared that all French citizens were also citizens of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies since it was a member of the Empire, even if this was not to the pleasure of the French.

    Joachim Murat took over as commander of the cavalry during the Russian expedition (French invasion of Russia) despite a tense relationship with his predecessor. The enemy withdrew until the Moscow, where a bloody but ultimately fruitless fight took place, in which the king stood out. The Cossacks, in particular, looked up to Murat as a hero because of his courage and flair.

    In the heat of combat, Murat raised his whip in a show of respect. Following the victory, the marshal advanced through Russia and took Moscow, but the city’s destruction caused the French army to flee. Returning to France after the uprising over the Malet incident (Malet coup of 1812), Napoleon put his faith in Murat to lead the reorganized armed forces. The latter stayed put and eventually handed over leadership to Eugène de Beauharnais so he could go back to Naples.

    After returning to his realm, Murat wasted no time in opening negotiations with Austria and England. Nonetheless, he never fully abandoned Napoleon’s cause and, in 1813, joined up with the French leader to head up the cavalry. Although he saw action at Dresden, the Imperial forces were ultimately routed at Leipzig (Battle of Leipzig). His perspective shifted from that of a Prince of the Empire to that of a King, and from that point on, he regarded himself as entirely responsible for the needs of his own country. His wife, Caroline, was also an important motivating factor. He signed the peace treaty with Austria on January 11, 1814, rescuing his kingdom by betraying Napoleon.

    However, the calm was only temporary. Upon Napoleon’s defeat and exile to Elba, Talleyrand advocated at the Congress of Vienna for the restoration of the Bourbon dynasty to the Kingdom of Naples. As you may imagine, Murat was anxious. There was danger in his realm. Against the Austrians, who wanted to maintain their zone of influence on the northern part of the peninsula, Murat planned to defend himself in Italy by depending on the nationalist groups, which he would be able to readily unite. Aware of the events unfolding in Elba, he knew that now was the time to win or die by following Napoleon if he returned.

    Statue of Joachim Murat on the façade of the Royal Palace of Naples.
    Statue of Joachim Murat on the façade of the Royal Palace of Naples.

    Murat saw his chance to fulfill his aim of raising and unifying all of Italy with the backing of the nationalists on March 1, 1815, when Napoleon landed at Golfe-Juan. On March 18, he declared war on Austria, issuing the now-famous statement from Rimini: “A scream is heard from the Alps to the Strait of Scylla, and this cry is: the freedom of Italy!” In Italian history books, Murat was no longer just a French puppet king; instead, he was elevated to the status of national hero and a forerunner of the Risorgimento (Unification of Italy). Because of this, the figure was rehabilitated on the peninsula towards the end of the 19th century, when unification took effect, and his statue still stands in Naples today.

    The king’s campaign was successful at the outset, and when the Austrians were driven back to the Po River, the city of Bologna was freed to the cheers of its citizens. However, his counteroffensive backfired, and he was eventually beaten at Tolentino and forced to withdraw and escape. Although he set off for Gaeta, the presence of the English navy prevented him from reaching his destination until he landed in France, where he remained until the Bourbons reestablished their rule over Naples. His wife Caroline, who had sought safety on an English vessel, saw the acclaim bestowed upon the new king.

    Murat: The fallen prince

    Murat's death sentence, as shown in the Naples State Archive
    Murat’s death sentence, as shown in the Naples State Archive.

    Murat was back in his home country, awaiting a summons from Napoleon. The latter was preparing for battle, and when one thinks of battle, one thinks of an army; when one thinks of an army, one thinks of cavalry, and when one thinks of cavalry, one thinks of Murat. But his wait was in vain since Napoleon never called him, and it was Michel Ney who spearheaded the cavalry attacks at Waterloo (Battle of Waterloo). Many argue that a different result would have been achieved if a cavalryman of his caliber had been in charge in front of the English lines. An unprovable claim that belongs in the domain of uchronia. As the coalition troops closed in on France, Murat fled to Corsica, where he was greeted with open arms and where the soldiers rallied to support him.

    After being pursued by General Jean-Antoine Verdier, Murat escaped to Ajaccio, where the National Guards were waiting to salute him. Not being a leader of the Corsican resistance was less important to him than reclaiming his kingdom. A man of great bravado, Murat was much admired. He set out with 250 soldiers on the evening of September 28, 1815, aboard the flotilla of Barbara, a former corsair whom he had elevated to the rank of Neapolitan baron and captain of a frigate. Did he conspire against his previous monarch?

    Castello di Pizzo, Murat's place of imprisonment and execution
    Castello di Pizzo, Murat’s place of imprisonment and execution.

    Though Murat preferred to disembark at Trieste, Barbara used their hunger as an excuse to go with him to Pizzo, where he claimed to still have partisans. Unfortunately, the flotilla was scattered by a storm, and only two ships, or roughly thirty men, were able to accompany him. They expected to find partisans in Pizzo, but instead they encountered a community hostile due to the recollection of Joachim Murat’s brutal suppression of brigandage in the area. After an argument on October 8, 1815, he was captured and transported to the fort of Pizzo.

    Murat, foreseeing his own death, sent a farewell letter to his wife. He flatly rejected the mock trial that was suggested for him by the Court Martial. When the Court Martial began its trial, the order of execution had already come from Naples; therefore, he was correct on this point. Upon hearing his sentence in the early afternoon of October 13, 1815, Murat had half an hour to pray for mercy before being led to the castle plaza and executed by firing squad.

    Joachim Murat asked them, “Where should I sit?” with a stunning lack of complexity. Even though a chair and a ribbon were offered to him, he politely declined. He loosened his shirt to expose his chest and gave the following instructions to his executioners: “Soldiers, respect the face and aim at the heart.” He had just been struck in the chest and hand before he went down. Since he showed signs of life, the police officer gave the order to fire two more bullets. Then his corpse was added to the rest of the graves. The Bourbons may have been able to bury the corpse, but they couldn’t bury the legend of the man formerly known as “the King of the Braves and the Bravest of the Kings.”

    Bibliography:

    1. Emsley, Clive (2014). Napoleon: Conquest, Reform and Reorganisation. Routledge. ISBN 978-1317610281.
    2. Fisher, Herbert A. L. (1903). Studies in Napoleonic Statesmanship Germany. Oxford: Clarendon press.
    3. Kircheisen, F.M. (2010). Memoires Of Napoleon I.
    4. Phipps, Ramsey Weston (1926). Armies of the First French Republic: And the Rise of the Marshals of Napoleon I. Oxford University Press, H. Milford.
  • Battle of Trafalgar: The Story of How Admiral Nelson Defended Britain Against Invasion

    Battle of Trafalgar: The Story of How Admiral Nelson Defended Britain Against Invasion

    The Battle of Trafalgar took place on October 21, 1805, between the French and Spanish fleets commanded by Vice Admiral Villeneuve and the British fleet commanded by Vice Admiral Nelson. While Vice Admiral Nelson was killed, the British were able to prevail despite being outnumbered. After the Battle of Trafalgar, Napoleon abandoned his plans to conquer Britain, and the British Navy established its dominance over the oceans. Following this decisive victory, England performed a number of symbolic acts to honor the occasion.

    —>Admiral Nelson employed a bold and aggressive tactic known as the “Nelson Touch,” where he divided the British fleet into two columns and aimed to break through the Franco-Spanish line. This tactic allowed the British to engage the enemy fleet more effectively.

    Why Was the Battle of Trafalgar Fought?

    Napoleon defeating Austrian General Mack while Nelson seizes French ships, colonies, and trade, British cartoon by Isaac Cruikshank, November 19, 1805.
    Napoleon defeating Austrian General Mack while Nelson seizes French ships, colonies, and trade, British cartoon by Isaac Cruikshank, November 19, 1805.

    After the short Peace of Amiens, hostilities between the United Kingdom and France resumed on May 18. Napoleon Bonaparte‘s goal of invading and conquering Britain remained steadfast despite his extensive travels throughout Europe. In order to vanquish his most formidable foe, he mustered an army in the Boulogne camp.

    When the French monarch dared to challenge the British, he had to do so with a fleet that could compete with and hopefully defeat the British navy. Conquering the landmass without first dominating the waters around the island was an absurd idea. So he gave Vice Admiral Villeneuve the job of assembling a fleet.

    Who Fought in the Battle of Trafalgar?

    Death of Nelson on the deck of the HMS Victory.
    Death of Nelson on the deck of the HMS Victory.

    At the Battle of Trafalgar, Vice Admiral Villeneuve led the Franco-Spanish fleet against Vice Admiral Nelson’s British fleet. It was Napoleon himself who gave Villeneuve, the military leader, the responsibility of assembling a navy strong enough to confront and destroy the British. On the other hand, the British government chose Vice Admiral Nelson because of the creative ways in which he deviated from conventional military strategy.

    Nelson was able to think on his feet and take swift action, allowing him to consistently outmaneuver his superiors. Even though he was killed in action at Trafalgar, his efforts set him apart from the competition and helped secure victory for an outnumbered British force. And whereas the Franco-Spanish fleet had 33 ships of the line, six frigates, and two brigs, the British fleet only had 27.

    The victory was thus rather favorable to the Franco-Spanish troops, who, sure of Nelson’s strategy, let themselves be trapped. During the conflict, Nelson told his troops, “England expects that every man will do his duty,” a phrase that has since been ingrained in the language of the English-speaking world.

    The Victory, Royal Sovereign, Temeraire, Neptune, and Britannia were the primary ships representing Britain in the conflict. The French and Spanish fleets included such ships as the Neptuno, the Principe de Asturias, the Indomptable, the Santa Anna, the Rayo, and the Santisima Trinidad.

    —>Admiral Nelson, full name Horatio Nelson, was a British naval officer who led the Royal Navy at the Battle of Trafalgar. He devised innovative naval tactics and strategies that contributed to the British victory, although he lost his life during the battle.

    Who Won the Battle of Trafalgar?

    Horatio Nelson,
    Horatio Nelson.

    British forces, under the command of Vice Admiral Horatio Nelson, prevailed in the Battle of Trafalgar on October 21, 1805. Though outnumbered, they had much more battlefield experience than their French and Spanish counterparts. Nonetheless, the British owe their success, in all likelihood, to the strategies Nelson used. The later plan included a perpendicular rather than a frontal assault, cutting the defensive line of the Franco-Spanish fleet.

    The British plan worked, as Villeneuve was captured and 23 of the French and Spanish fleet’s 33 ships were destroyed. More than 7,000 people were killed, 2,500 were injured, and hundreds of detainees were taken. The British navy suffered significantly less damage; they lost no vessels and just 400 men.

    While the French celebrated the capture of the ship Le Redoutable, the British forces were still mourning the loss of their vice admiral, Nelson, who was killed by a sharpshooter. Within hours of being shot, he was dead because the bullet had entered his spine, lung, and left shoulder. Despite this significant loss, the British were still able to gain undeniable maritime supremacy.

    What Were the Results of the Battle of Trafalgar?

    Trafalgar Square in London
    Trafalgar Square in London was named to commemorate the Battle of Trafalgar. The square features Nelson’s Column, a monument dedicated to Admiral Nelson, and has become a symbolic location honoring British naval victories. Dietmar Rabich / Wikimedia Commons / “London, Trafalgar Square, Nelson’s Column — 2016 — 4851” / CC BY-SA 4.0.

    Napoleon gave up on his intentions to attack England after losing at Trafalgar and instead turned his attention to the rest of Europe. The French navy never again made an effort to attack Britain through the sea after this victory solidified British maritime superiority. The French navy continued its operations despite the country’s loss. In contrast, the Spanish fleet suffered heavy losses at the hands of the British during the Battle of Trafalgar.

    There are several symbolic remnants from the Battle of Trafalgar that are still there today. In the Royal Navy, for instance, you may see HMS Victory, the ship that Admiral Nelson used. Also, the British instituted a holiday called Trafalgar Day to commemorate the victory, although hardly anyone seems to remember it now.

    Last but not least, we must not overlook Trafalgar Square, one of the British memorials to the success of the Battle of Trafalgar. There is a statue of Admiral Nelson atop a tall column in this plaza in the heart of London, which bears the name of the epic fight.

    The State of the Forces at War

    The British advanced in two parallel columns, some distance apart: In the north, the 12-ship line led by Horatio Nelson himself consisted of the following ships:

    • HMS Africa (two-decker of 64 guns, crew of 498 men under the command of Captain Henry Digby), charged with attacking the head of the Franco-Spanish fleet
    • HMS Victory (flagship, three-decker of 104 guns, crew of 821 men under the command of Captain Thomas Masterman Hardy), with Vice Admiral Lord Nelson on board, commander in chief of the fleet
    • HMS Temeraire (three-decker of 98 guns, crew of 718 men under the command of Captain Eliab Harvey)
    • HMS Neptune (three-decks of 98 guns, crew of 741 men under the command of Captain Thomas Francis Fremantle)
    • HMS Leviathan (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 623 men under the command of Captain Henry William Bayntun)
    • HMS Conqueror (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 573 men under the command of Captain Israel Pellew)
    • HMS Britannia (three-decks of 100 guns, crew of 854 men under the command of Rear-Admiral William Carnegie, 7th Earl of Northesk)
    • HMS Spartan (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 620 men under the command of Captain Sir Francis Laforey)
    • HMS Minotaur (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 625 men under the command of Captain Charles John Moore Mansfield)
    • HMS Ajax (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 702 men under the command of Lieutenant John Pilford)
    • HMS Agamemnon (two-decks of 64 guns, crew of 498 men under the command of Captain Sir Edward Berry)
    • HMS Orion (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 541 men under the command of Captain Edward Codrington)

    A leeward column, composed of the following 15 vessels (Vice-Admiral Cuthbert Collingwood’s division):

    • HMS Royal Sovereign (three-decks of 100 guns, crew of 826 men under the command of Captain Edward Rotheram, with on board Vice-Admiral Cuthbert Collingwood)
    • HMS Belleisle (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 728 men under the command of Captain William Hargood)
    • HMS Mars (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 615 men under the command of Captain George Duff and Lieutenant William Hennah)
    • HMS Tonnant (two-decks of 80 guns, crew of 688 men under the command of Captain Charles Tyler)
    • HMS Bellerophon (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 522 men under the command of Captain John Cooke then Lieutenant William Pryce Cumby)
    • HMS Colossus (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 571 men under the command of Captain James Nicoll Morris)
    • HMS Achilles (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 619 men under the command of Captain Richard King)
    • HMS Defence (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 599 men under the command of Captain George Hope)
    • HMS Defiance (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 577 men under the command of Captain Philip Charles Durham)
    • HMS Prince (three-decks of 98 guns, crew of 735 men under the command of Captain Richard Grindall)
    • HMS Dreadnought (three-decks of 98 guns, crew of 725 men under the command of Captain John Conn)
    • HMS Revenge (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 598 men under the command of Captain Robert Moorsom)
    • HMS Swiftsure (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 570 men under the command of Captain William Gordon Rutherfurd)
    • HMS Thunderer (two-decks of 74 guns, crew of 611 men under the command of Lieutenant John Stockham)
    • HMS Polyphemus (two-decks of 64 guns, crew of 484 men under the command of Captain Robert Redmill).

    An attached fleet is also composed of the following vessels:

    • HMS Euryalus (frigate of 36 guns, crew of 262 men under the command of Captain The Honourable Henry Blackwood)
    • HMS Naiad (36-gun frigate, crew of 333 under the command of Captain Thomas Dundas)
    • HMS Phoebe (36-gun frigate, crew of 256 men under the command of Captain The Honourable Thomas Bladen Capel)
    • HMS Sirius (36-gun frigate, crew of 273 under the command of Captain William Prowse)
    • HMS Pickle (schooner of 8 guns, crew of 42 men under the command of Lieutenant John Richards La Penotière)
    • HMS Entreprenante (10-gun cutter, crew of 41 men under the command of Lieutenant Robert Benjamin Young).

    The French and Spanish fleet sailed in a circle with a concave side toward the enemy, spanning three nautical miles. The allied ships did not move forward in a single, continuous line, but rather in five different groups, each of which followed a roughly linear path but was severely isolated from the others.

    These 33 vessels were arranged from north to south as follows:

    • Spain’s Neptuno, the two-decker with 80 cannons, crew of 800 men, and Captain Don Cayetano Cayetano Valdés y Flores in charge.
    • France’s Scipion, a two-decked gunboat with 74 cannons and 755 men serving under the command of Captain Charles Berrenger
    • France’s Intrépide was a two-decker gunboat with 74 cannons and had a crew of 745 men working under the direction of Captain Louis-Antoine-Cyprien Infernet.
    • France’s Formidable, two decks with 80 guns, crew of 840 men, commanded by Rear Admiral Pierre-Etienne-René-Marie Dumanoir Le Pelley and Captain Jean-Marie Letellier.
    • France’s Duguay-Trouin, the two-decker had 74 cannons and carried a crew of 755 men. Captain Claude Touffet was in charge of the vessel.
    • France’s Mont-Blanc was a ship with two decks and 74 guns, and it had a crew of 755 men who were commanded by Guillaume-Jean-Noel de Lavillegris.
    • Spain’s Rayo was a three-decker warship with a total of 100 cannons. It had a crew of 830 men and was commanded by Don Enrique MacDonnell.
    • Spain’s San Francisco de Ass, a two-decker with 74 guns and a crew of 657 men, was commanded by Captain Don Luis de Florès.
    • France’s Héros had 74 guns and a crew of 690 men. Corvette captain Jean-Baptiste-Joseph-René Poulain and subsequently lieutenant Jean-Louis Conor were in charge of the two-decker ship at various times.
    • Spain’s San Agustin was a two-decker warship with 74 guns and 711 men serving under the leadership of Captain Don Felipe Jado Cajigal.
    • Spain’s Santisima Trinidad was a 136-gun four-decker with a crew of 1,048 men. Rear Admiral Baltasar Hidalgo de Cisneros y de la Torre and Captain Francisco Javier de Uriarte y Borja were in charge of the ship.
    • France’s Bucentaure, the flagship was a two-decker with 80 cannons and had a crew of 888 men under the command of Captain Jean-Jacques Magendie. Vice Admiral Pierre-Charles-Jean-Baptiste-Silvestre de Villeneuve was also present on board.
    • France’s Redoutable, a two-decker with 74 guns and 643 men serving under the command of Captain Jean Jacques Étienne Lucas.
    • Spain’s San Justo was a ship with two decks and a total of 74 cannons. It had a crew of 694 men and was commanded by Don Francisco Javier Garstón.
    • France’s Neptune, two decks with 80 guns, and 888 men serving as crew under the direction of the captain of ship 1st class Esprit-Tranquille Maistral.
    • Spain’s San Leandro with two decks and 64 cannons, and a crew of 606 men, all under the direction of the ship’s captain, Don José Quevedo.
    • Spain’s Santa Ana was a three-decker warship with a total of 112 cannons and a crew of 1189 men. She was commanded by Vice Admiral Ignacio Mara de Llava y Sáenz de Navarrete and Captain Don José Ramón de Gardoqui y Jaraveitia. Santa Ana was in service during the Spanish American War.
    • France’s L’Indomptable was a two-decker battleship equipped with 80 cannons and boasting an 887-man crew that was led by Captain Jean-Joseph Hubert.
    • France’s Le Fougueux was a two-decker gunboat with 74 cannons and had a crew of 755 men under the leadership of Captain Louis Alexis Baudouin.
    • France’s Pluton, a two-decker with 74 cannons and a crew of 755 men, was commanded by Captain of the First Class Julien Julien Cosmao.
    • Spain’s Monarca was a warship with two decks and 74 guns, and it had a crew of 667 men who were commanded by Don Teodoro de Argumosa Bourke, the captain of the ship.
    • France’s Algeciras had a total of 74 cannons between her two bridges and a crew of 755 men. Rear Admiral Charles René Magon de Médine and afterwards Commander Laurent Tourneur were in charge of the vessel.
    • Spain’s Bahama was a two-decker ship of 74 guns and a crew of 690 men. Commodore Dionisio Alcalá Galiano y Pinedo was in charge of the vessel.
    • France’s L’Aigle was a two-decker gunboat with 74 cannons and a crew of 755 men. Captain Pierre-Paulin Gourrège was in command.
    • Spain’s Montaés, a two-decker with 74 guns and 715 men serving under the command of Captain Francisco Alcedo y Bustamante.
    • France’s Swiftsure was a two-decker with 74 guns and a crew of 755 men. Captain Charles-Eusèbe Lhospitalier de Villemadrin was in command.
    • France’s Argonaute was a naval force consisting of two 74-gun warships, a total crew of 755 men, with Captain Jacques Épron-Desjardins in charge.
    • Spain’s Argonauta was a two-decker warship equipped with 80 cannons and boasting a crew of 798 men who were led by Captain Don José Antonio de Pareja y Mariscal.
    • Spain’s San Ildefonso was a two-decker warship with 74 cannons. It had a crew of 716 men and was commanded by Captain Don José Ramón de Vargas y Varáez.
    • France’s Achille was a two-decker ship with 74 cannons and had 755 men working for her under the command of Captain Louis Gabriel Deniéport.
    • Spain’s Príncipe de Asturias, three-decker of 112 guns, crew of 1113 men under the direction of Commodore Rafael de Hore, having on board Admiral Don Federico Carlos Gravina and Rear Admiral Don Antonio de Escaño y García de Cáceres
    • France’s Berwick, two-decker with 74 cannons, crew of 755 men, and Captain Jean-Gilles Filhol de Camas in command.
    • Spain’s San Juan Nepomuceno was a two-decker warship with 74 guns and a crew of 693 men. Commodore Don Cosme Damián Churruca y Elorza was in charge of the ship’s crew.

    An attached fleet included the following vessels, all French:

    • Cornélie was a frigate with 40 guns and was commanded by André-Juls-Francois de Martineng.
    • Hermione is a forty-gun frigate that is commanded by Captain Jean-Michel Mahé.
    • Hortense was a forty-gun frigate that was commanded by Louis-Charles-Auguste Delamarre de Lamellerie.
    • Rhin was a frigate with 40 guns and was commanded by Captain Michel Chesneau.
    • Thémis, Captain Nicolas-Joseph-Pierre Jugan was in charge of the 40-gun frigate, which was named after him.
    • Furet, a brig armed with 18 cannons and with a crew of 130 men, it was commanded by Lieutenant Pierre-Antoine-Toussaint Dumay.
    • Argus was a 16-gun brig with 110 men on board and was commanded by Lieutenant Yves-Francois Taillard.

    Together, the Allies’ 33 warships and 7 frigates sported 2,856 cannons. Only 27 ships and 6 frigates or corvettes were available to the English, together with 2,314 cannons. Their ships were typically quicker, more nimble, better directed, and served by commanders and sailors who were more experienced and more educated, and they had 7 three-deck ships versus the allies’ four (all Spanish).

    Damage Report of the Battle of Trafalgar

    The Allies suffered a crushing loss. The English were successful in seizing 17 vessels out of a total of 33 that were involved in the battle. Eighteenth went down in the water. Four of the fifteen survivors, commanded by Dumanoir, made their way to the open sea, while the other eleven sought sanctuary in Cadiz with Gravina. Around 6,500 people were killed or injured, among them were 3,000 French and over 1,000 French wounded. Nine ship captains, including Rear Admiral Magon, perished. Ten others were wounded, as well as Rear Admirals Gravina, Álava and Báltasar Hidalgo de Cisneros. A large number of Villeneuve’s soldiers, numbering in the thousands, also became prisoners.

    Here are the details of the fate of each ship:

    • Neptuno: Recaptured by the allies and then failed before Cadiz
    • Scipion: Taken on November 4
    • Intrepid: Voluntarily burned by the English after its capture
    • Formidable: Taken on November 4
    • Duguay-Trouin: Taken on November 4
    • Mont-Blanc: Taken on November 4
    • Rayo: Burned by the English before Cadiz after its stranding
    • San Francisco de Asís: Rescued
    • Hero: Rescued
    • San Agustín: Voluntarily burned by the English after its capture
    • Santísima Trinidad: Scuttled by the English after its capture
    • Bucentaure: Recaptured by its crew then wrecked
    • Redoubtable: Scuttled by the English after its capture
    • San Justo: Rescued
    • Neptune: Rescued
    • San Leandro: Rescued
    • Santa Ana: Recaptured by the Allies in front of Cadiz
    • The Indomitable: Rescued
    • The Fiery: Abandoned by the English after its capture and then wrecked
    • Pluto: Rescued
    • Monarca: Abandoned by the English after its capture and then wrecked
    • Algeciras: Recaptured by her crew
    • Bahama: Sunk
    • L’Aigle: Abandoned by the English after its capture then wrecked
    • Montañés: Rescued
    • Swiftsure: Taken to Gibraltar then destroyed
    • Argonaut: Rescued
    • Argonauta: Scuttled by the English after its capture
    • San Ildefonso: Taken to Gibraltar and destroyed
    • Achilles: Burned and sunk
    • Príncipe de Asturias: Rescued
    • Berwick: Abandoned by the English after its capture and wrecked
    • San Juan Nepomuceno: Rescued.

    In all, 449 British sailors were killed, including Admiral Horatio Nelson, and 1,214 were injured. Of the ships involved, the HMS Colossus suffered the most casualties (40), while 13 others had fewer than 10, and one had none (the HMS Prince). Despite the relatively low number of casualties, the damage was so severe that half of the fleet had to seek shelter in Gibraltar.

    Map of the Battle of Trafalgar

    Trafalgar aufstellung

    Period representation of the battle: the British ships are in red, the French in green and the Spanish in yellow. The British ship furthest north is the Africa, not the Neptune.

    References

    • Best, Nicholas (2005). Trafalgar. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. ISBN 0-297-84622-1.
    • Corbett, Sir Julian Stafford (1919). The campaign of Trafalgar. Vol. 2. Longmans, Green, and company. p. 538. URL.
    • Lavery, Brian (2009). Empire of the Seas. London: Conway Publishing. ISBN 9781844861095.
    • Lee, Christopher (2005). Nelson and Napoleon. London: Headline Book Publishing. ISBN 0-7553-1041-1.
    • A. Thomazi, Trafalgar, Payot, 1932, 199 p.
    • Danielle et Bernard Quintin, Dictionnaire des capitaines de vaisseau de Napoléon, collection Kronos, Paris 2003.
  • Battle of Austerlitz: The Battle Where Napoleon’s Tactical Genius Was Revealed

    Battle of Austerlitz: The Battle Where Napoleon’s Tactical Genius Was Revealed

    The Battle of Austerlitz took place on December 2, 1805, pitting the forces of Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte against the armies of the Russian Emperor (Alexander I) and the Austrian Emperor (Francis II). Also known as the Battle of the Three Emperors, this decisive French victory, achieved on the anniversary of the emperor’s coronation, overshadowed the naval disaster at the Battle of Trafalgar and effectively concluded the Third Coalition War in favor of the French.

    Napoleon, recognizing it as a personal triumph and a potent tool to legitimize his power, did not bestow any ducal or princely titles of Austerlitz upon his marshals. The day after, addressing his army, the emperor expressed satisfaction: “My people will welcome you back with delight, and all you will have to say is ‘I was at the Battle of Austerlitz’, for them to reply, ‘There goes a brave man.’”

    Where Did the Battle of Austerlitz take Place?

    Napoleon takes the surrender of General Mack and the Austrian army at Ulm.
    Napoleon takes the surrender of General Mack and the Austrian army at Ulm.

    The battlefield of Austerlitz is located about ten kilometers southeast of Brno, the capital of Moravia, which was then an Austrian province. In 1805, it was a rural area situated between the wooded slopes of the Moravian hills and the marshy course of the Schwarzawa. After capturing the main Austrian army at Ulm five weeks earlier, Napoleon was led to this region north of Vienna by the pursuit of what remained of Emperor Francis II’s forces. The latter had indeed abandoned the defense of his capital to meet his Russian counterpart, Alexander I, the other main instigator of the coalition formed against Napoleon’s France at the instigation of England.

    Let’s highlight some figures to grasp the magnitude of the battle: Austerlitz was a conflict lasting just over half a dozen hours, involving around 160,000 soldiers (approximately 75,000 French against 60,000 Russians and 25,000 Austrians) on a battlefield not exceeding, like most of that era, 150 km2. In just a quarter of a day, it cost the victors 9,000 killed, wounded, and captured, while the vanquished suffered 27,000 casualties. Even victory is written in letters of blood, with 1,300 killed and 7,000 wounded on the French side.

    Preparing for Battle

    Battle of Austerlitz, Situation at 1800, 1 December 1805
    Battle of Austerlitz, Situation at 1800 military time, 1 December 1805.

    On the evening of December 1, 1805, a peculiar scene unfolded from the French army’s trenches to the south-east of Brünn. The French are stationed in the middle and to the left of the route from Brünn to Olmutz, since this is where the incoming Austro-Russian army would be seen. However, the French right wing is relatively thin and bald farther south. To put it mildly, this is an issue because if the coalition forces break through, they will be able to sever the Brünn-Vienna route, cutting off the remainder of the Grand Army from its supply lines. Napoleon was well aware that the III Corps, under the command of Marshal Davout, had just completed a challenging march from Vienna.

    But the French emperor’s blunder was entirely on purpose. It’s a ploy to draw in his adversaries and have them attack his right wing. Attacks from the French center would be most effective if they were to engage along the marshes on the southern end of the battlefield, exposing their own right flank. The world knows about this ruse, which is frequently held up as the pinnacle of Napoleon I’s military brilliance.

    Not as well remembered is the widespread intoxication campaign that accompanied it. Since occupying Vienna, France’s emperor has worked hard to give the alliance the impression that he is weaker than he really is. According to this overarching reasoning, the 7,000 Davout soldiers are similarly stuck in Vienna, isolated from the rest of the army.

    Rather than anything else, the specifics of the situation should inform your strategic decision. The Prussians, who had remained neutral up until that point, were becoming restless; their potential entry into the alliance posed a major threat to the supply lines, which were already at dangerously low levels. What’s more, it was well into October by this point, and winter was just around the corner. Napoleon could lose momentum and watch his foes become stronger if he waited until the next spring to make a decision if he failed to win a decisive victory early.

    So he did all in his power to provoke an assault by the Austro-Russians. And his strategy becomes successful, as Tsar Alexander and the majority of his generals are ready to battle despite the warnings of Emperor Francis and Russian Marshal Mikhail Kutuzov, who is technically in charge. They will fall right into the trap their opponent has laid for them. As Napoleon had predicted, the right flank of the French army was the target of their assault. A vanguard led four columns of Austro-Russians toward the settlement of Telnitz, which was located between the marshes and the plateau of Pratzen.

    The Sun of Austerlitz: The Battle of the Three Emperors

    Napoleon with his troops on the eve of battle. Painting by Louis-François, Baron Lejeune
    Napoleon with his troops on the eve of battle. Painting by Louis-François, Baron Lejeune.

    Today it was Telnice, a little town between Satcany and Menin in the northwestern part of the country. On the morning of December 2, 1805, the third line infantry unit was tasked with garrisoning the fort. Sokolnice was located a short distance north of here. The city of Sokolnitz was another target of the assault, and it was guarded by just the 26th light infantry unit. The French garrison’s fortifications remained in place. To be more specific, it was northeast of the settlement, which had grown to accommodate a few housing developments and light enterprises.

    From seven in the morning onward, Coalitionists launched a series of attacks on the two communities. Conditions on the battlefield were miserable, with chilly rain pouring down. As the leader of the onslaught against the French right flank, General Buxhövden’s soldiers must have been a sight to behold—and dreaded—as they marched closer. The fact that it was so poorly planned just made matters worse. It was still dark when he left, and to top it off, Buxhövden was simply drunk. The coalition army lacked the strict organization into corps, divisions, and brigades that the French army had. A traffic jam formed on the southern slopes of the Pratzen plateau as a result of the return of General Liechtenstein’s 5,000 cavalrymen, who were to stay in reserve.

    The French were able to back up the first assault because the vanguard and the four coalition columns didn’t attack all their targets at once. Eventually, however, sheer numbers would win out, and the French were ultimately sent away from Telnitz. They retreated to the opposite side of the Goldbach, a stream whose path can be seen on the satellite picture only as a narrow line of trees running northwest of Telnice and southeast of Sokolnice. The French right flank was not completely destroyed, however; Davout’s III Corps showed up in time to launch a counterattack and recover Telnitz. A charge by hussars will eventually push it back, but with artillery assistance, it may make up lost ground down the Goldbach.

    While exhausted from traveling 110 kilometers in two days, Davout’s men arrived just in time to help the other defenders (General Louis Friant’s division) focus on Sokolnitz, from which the French had been driven after a good initial resistance by the artillery of the Russian column commanded by, ironically, a French émigré who had gone into the service of the Tsar, Count Andrault de Langeron. At approximately nine in the evening, after Sokolnitz had changed hands many times, the Russians finally managed to take it. At that point, the French were severely outnumbered, but they wouldn’t have to worry about another assault since the focus of the battle of Austerlitz had abruptly shifted.

    The Attack on the Pratzen plateau

    Capture of a French regiment's eagle by the cavalry of the Russian guard, by Bogdan Willewalde (1884).
    Capture of a French regiment’s eagle by the cavalry of the Russian guard, by Bogdan Willewalde (1884).

    Let’s leave Sokolnice and go to Prace in the northeast. In 1805, this was the little settlement of Pratzen, named after the gently sloping plateau on which it was constructed. This eminence towers above the neighboring lowlands by roughly 40 meters. It was quite difficult to make out the slope from above today; the little rural roads curved in various spots were the only discernible landmarks. Napoleon, with his typical tactical brilliance, realized and declared this to be the key to victory before the conflict had even begun.

    Having ironed out the Austro-Russians at Telnitz and Sokolnitz, he sent in the Vandamme and Saint-Hilaire divisions of Marshal Soult’s IVth Corps at around nine o’clock. The morning fog lifted just west of Prace as sixteen thousand French infantrymen made their way up the valley. There, the myth of the “sun of Austerlitz” was penned.

    It also gave Kollowrat and Przybyszewski, the commanders of the last two Austro-Russian columns, an opportunity to see the gravity of the danger they faced for the first time. As they were stuck in a “traffic congestion” due to Liechtenstein’s error, the French snuck up on them and bayoneted them from behind.

    Coalition forces, caught off guard, put up a spirited fight until they lost their footing and dispersed en masse to the east. Just after nine o’clock, Soult had his artillery set up on the Pratzen plateau and firmly under his control. Mohyla Miru, just south of Prace, was the location of the monument dedicated to the combat that took place here.

    As the coalition’s advancing wing became more cut off from the remainder of the army, the latter being in imminent danger of being wiped out, the significance of the city of Pratzen became increasingly apparent.

    Then, Kutuzov attempted to retake command by launching a pincer assault, with heavy cavalry from Liechtenstein and the Russian Imperial Guard attempting to skirt around the left of Soult’s corps, which had moved to a new position. It did not escape Napoleon’s attention, and he promptly sent the army corps of Bernadotte and the cavalry of Joachim Murat to protect Soult’s left flank. If the French were able to hold Pratzen, they would have won the fight regardless of what happened afterwards.

    From the Moment of Decision to the Curse

    Starting about eleven o’clock, fierce infantry and cavalry fights broke out in the valleys between Jirikovice and Blazovice, which can still be seen today to the north of Prace. Fast-moving columns of soldiers on both sides ascended the plateau’s steep slopes. Bernadotte had a significant impact on the Russian Guard while Murat won the cavalry battle for the alliance. A retreat in front of his cavalry was inevitable after he had pushed back and chased the infantry. It was at this point that the French emperor ordered his own Guard to interfere, giving his mamelukes the edge they needed to overcome Tsar Alexander’s regiment of knights-guards.

    The outcome of the conflict was decided before midday. Kutuzov was out of options; the army corps of Lannes and the cavalry of Murat had massively assaulted Bagration, who was supposed to launch diversionary operations to lure French attention away from their right side. Despite this, he withdrew in excellent order down the Brünn-Olmutz route, via which Tsar Alexander, Emperor François, and their respective staffs would depart the battlefield at 1 p.m., with all hope gone. Only Kutuzov will stay behind to salvage what can be salvaged.

    The coalition’s condition was not improving in the south of the battlefield. As with the northern “pincer,” the soldiers tasked with retaking the Pratzen plateau were unsuccessful. Prior to encountering the French, they encountered a traffic bottleneck caused by their own late-arriving or escaping colleagues from the onslaught on Telnitz and Sokolnitz or the fight for Pratzen. If they survived being mowed down by the grapeshot that Soult’s guns spewed with redoubled strokes, they were smashed by the salvos of the French infantry’s muskets. The Austro-Russians knew, after only one setback, that they were squandering their efforts and the lives of their soldiers.

    To seal the victory, Napoleon gave the order for Soult to push south at about 2:00 p.m., crushing what remained of the coalition’s left flank and cutting off their final retreat. The two surviving columns, led by Andrault de Langeron and Dokhtorov, had been badly crushed after the vanguard was almost wiped out in the combat around Telnitz. After an hour and a half, they were just a confused mob of refugees hoping to reach safety in the marshes and frozen ponds.

    It was expected that the French would keep control of several thousand of them. The destiny of Others after Austerlitz will be far less desirable. The historic banks of the frozen pond of Satschan may still be seen today at Satcany; it was here that a renowned but controversial occurrence occurred during the disaster. As the French artillery opened up, the ice cracked and engulfed hundreds of guns and the horses that pulled them.

    The exact number of dead troops was unclear, but it seems that the figure has been considerably inflated since the incident. Some estimates put the death toll at several thousand. A few days later, the French had the pond drained in order to recover the cannons, which, along with the other pieces captured that day, provided the bronze that constitutes the Vendôme column in Paris today. However, it was unclear whether or not additional bodies had already been recovered and buried before the French arrived.

    Aftermath of the Battle of Austerlitz

    Napoleon and Francis II after the Battle of Austerlitz
    Napoleon and Francis II after the Battle of Austerlitz.

    In the late hours of December 2, 1805, the last large coalition force effectively vanished. On the one-year anniversary of his coronation, Napoleon Bonaparte had another reason to celebrate: the realization that he had finally won the decisive battle he had been seeking at Austerlitz, thanks to his skill as a strategist and tactician. On December 26, effectively ending the War of the Third Coalition, the Treaty of Presburg was signed. A dishonorable peace that would cost Francis II territory, a massive war indemnity, the title of Germanic Emperor, and the birth of a “Confederation of the Rhine” founded on the ruins of the Holy Empire.

    However, the roots for the subsequent coalitions were sown during this period of peace: in 1806, an embarrassed Prussia joined Russia and England in an effort to break France’s grip on Germany; and in 1809, Austria attempted, but failed, to exact vengeance on Russia and England.

    References

    • Castle, Ian. Austerlitz: Napoleon and the Eagles of Europe. Pen & Sword Books, 2005. ISBN 1-84415-171-9.
    • Chandler, D. G. (1966). The Campaigns of Napoleon. New York: Simon & Schuster. OCLC 185576578.
    • Mikaberidze, A. (2005). Russian Officer Corps of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. New York: Savas Beatie. ISBN 978-1-61121-002-6.
    • Uffindell, Andrew (2003). Great Generals of the Napoleonic Wars. Kent: Spellmount Ltd. ISBN 1-86227-177-1.
    • Dupuy, Trevor N. 1990). Understanding Defeat: How to Recover from Loss in Battle to Gain Victory in War. Paragon House. ISBN 1-5577-8099-4.
  • Battle of Waterloo: The Final Fight of Napoleon’s the Hundred Days

    Battle of Waterloo: The Final Fight of Napoleon’s the Hundred Days

    On June 18, 1815, not far from Brussels, Napoleon Bonaparte‘s soldiers met the Anglo-Prussian troops of Wellington and Blücher at the Battle of Waterloo. Previously, on March 20, 1815, Napoleon reclaimed control in France (“Hundred Days”) after returning to Paris after escaping from the island of Elba, where he was imprisoned for 11 months. Russian, Austrian, Prussian, and British forces were swiftly sent to the Belgian border in order to initiate an invasion of France. Emperor Napoleon, with his 124,000 men, marched out to confront the foe. Waterloo was the primary confrontation of the battle, and Napoleon lost there, leading to the eventual collapse of the First Empire. Three armies participated in the Battle of Waterloo: Napoleon’s Army of the North (Armée du Nord), a multinational Anglo-allied army under Wellington, and a Prussian army under General Blücher.

    Background of the Battle of Waterloo

    Meanwhile, Louis XVIII and his court reached Flanders, the escapee from Elba, Napoleon made a triumphant arrival in Paris on March 20, 1815, following a careful strategy of avoiding the most royalist districts. Rather then take him to Paris in chains, the soldiers joined him. The dignitaries of the Empire were there to greet Napoleon I as he alighted from his cart, and throughout Paris, tricolor flags waved proudly from every window as he was being carried up to the steps of Tuileries Palace by the masses.

    Following Napoleon’s return to power in 1815, the Great Powers of Europe (Austria, Great Britain, Prussia, and Russia) proclaimed Napoleon an outlaw, and so the War of the Seventh Coalition had begun on March 13, 1815. Austria, the Netherlands, Prussia, Russia, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and a number of German states formed the Seventh Coalition.

    Emperor Napoleon’s return to power was met with celebration, but this should not obscure the serious challenges he was facing. Not all former Empire executives had come forth, and there were widespread suspicions that this imperial restoration was bound to fail. In an effort to keep the most dangerous ministers on his side, Napoleon restored Joseph Fouché’s police ministry, but politically, he needed to give pledges, especially because the Senate was responsible for his removal in 1814.

    Napoleon especially aimed at liberalization; press freedom was restored (although he turned against it), and on April 6 his old adversary Benjamin Constant was given the task of writing a new constitution. In one week, Constant, who had just recently insulted Napoleon in the Journal des Débats, drafted a constitution that would define the new Napoleonic administration: a representative system with a wide electoral base, ministries answerable to the chambers, etc. Even the Chamber of Representatives was called to order by the end of May, and thus, the Additional Act to the Constitutions of the Empire had established a fully liberal system.

    1,300,000 YES votes were cast in the 1815 French constitutional referendum, while only 4,000 NO votes were cast. While it was imperative to focus all efforts on the exterior threats, mainly the Seventh Coalition, Napoleon’s main goal was to avert an internal resistance (the Vendée region was already uprising) by supporting both the Royalists and the Republicans. Former National Convention (a French Revolution parliament) members like Bertrand Barère and other Revolutionary heroes like the Marquis de Lafayette were now serving in the new Chamber of Representatives.

    At the forefront of this group was Jean-Denis Lanjuinais, a critic of Napoleon and one of the first to call for his overthrow in 1814. So, it’s not known whether Napoleon actually acknowledged his diminished power or if he saw this as a temporary compromise that he expected to revert to after the external threats had been eliminated and Napoleon no longer had any challengers at the head of his army. As such, Napoleon needed a swift military victory not merely to remove the foreign threat but also to destroy his political rivals at home.

    Also, Napoleon had to reconnect with his troops and the people in order to get them back on his side. Louis-Nicolas Davout took command of the Ministry of War, which resulted in the recall of soldiers who had been disbanded during the Bourbon Restoration (1814), the conscripts raised in 1815 for Napoleon’s army, the restoring of the National Guards, the Imperial Guard, and the cavalry (to the letdown of the gendarmes, who were now forced to patrol on foot), and the formation and deployment of VIII Corps (Grande Armée) with a focus on the northern and eastern borders.

    In order to counter the Seventh Coalition with the strength of 700,000, Napoleon planned to muster 800,000 soldiers by the end of the year. Napoleon Bonaparte also sorted through the marshals who hadn’t been faithful to him and reorganized the top of the army. By the end of it all, just Louis-Gabriel SuchetMichel NeyLouis-Nicolas Davout, and Jean-de-Dieu Soult remained under Napoleon, along with a newly promoted name, Emmanuel de Grouchy who will be decisive in the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo.

    A conflict with the Seventh Coalition is inevitable

    napoleon 1815 france the Seventh Coalition 3
    The Seventh Coalition rallies. (Map: The Waterloo Association)

    Along with this military display, Napoleon also wanted to detach his father-in-law, the Emperor of Austria Francis I, from the coalition, but Austrian Foreign Minister Metternich made it clear that they would never ally with Napoleon regardless. Napoleon suffered another setback in Italy when his key ally, the Napoleonic King of Naples, Joachim Murat, who previously betrayed him during the Fall of Napoleon in 1814, tried to take the Italian peninsula on his own to atone for his actions against Napoleon, but he was defeated by the Austrian army under Neipperg.

    Thus, the peaceful rhetoric that Napoleon was attempting to convey to the Seventh Coalition countries was now broken as a consequence of Murat’s hasty move. It became clear to the coalition that a violent Napoleonic showdown was, in fact, imminent. On June 1, 1804, Napoleon organized a grand event in the Champ de Mai to mark his return.

    Planning of the battle

    To impose himself on his political opponents while on his way to Paris, Napoleon wanted a decisive victory against an uncompromising external threat. A number of campaign plans were proposed against the Seventh Coalition, including an April assault, then a defensive battle in Paris and Lyon, or an offensive in June. Napoleon decided on the latter. Because Brussels was surrounded by the Duke of Wellington’s Anglo-Dutch forces, Namur by Blücher’s Prussians, and Moscow and Vienna were too far away to help them.

    If Napoleon were to launch an offensive in June, he could be able to catch Wellington and Blücher’s Prussians off guard before they launch an assault first. If Napoleon were to win decisively over these two armies, it wouldn’t be the last of the Seventh Coalition (the Austrians and Russians would still be standing), but he believed it would be enough of a shock to get them back to the negotiation table as soon as possible.

    And if the offensive approach against Paris and Lyon were to fail, the defensive strategy was always an option. To prepare for this possibility, Napoleon stationed 25,000 more soldiers in Alsace to confront the Austrians. It has been argued that this extreme caution by Napoleon was a mistake since it prevented him from committing the whole force of the Empire to the decisive Battle of Waterloo in Belgium.

    On June 14, Napoleon arrived in Belgium with 124,000 men and 370 cannons. His plan to defeat Wellington’s 95,000 soldiers and 186 guns with the Prussians’ 124,000 soldiers and 312 cannons was to separate their forces to compensate for the significant numerical deficit.

    The French army crossed the Sambre River in three columns on June 15, 1815, after having successfully surrounded the city of Charleroi in Belgium and driven out opposing detachments. Napoleon’s plan was to strike at the Prussians first, as they might threaten his flank if the British intervened on their side. As the French General Grouchy repelled the Prussian advance at Fleurus, Napoleon sent Marshal Michel Ney to Quatre Bras to hold the British.

    The battles of Ligny and Quatre Bras

    Battle of Ligny 2
    Battle of Ligny (Credit: Theodore Yung)

    On the night of June 15–16, the Duke of Wellington realized that the French assault was primarily directed against the Prussian army. He devised a plan to shock the French forces by having the Prussians act as an “anvil,” keeping Napoleon’s soldiers pinned down around Ligny, and allowing Wellington to land the “hammer.” The British struck the French flanks at the Battle of Quatre Bras while Napoleon and Grouchy marched to confront the Prussians at the Battle of Ligny.

    With the oppressive heat and humidity, Napoleon decided to make an assault on the Prussian center while expecting Ney to take the Quatre Bras and then strike the Prussian flank. But under the command of Wellington, the British resisted, and Ney failed to take the Quatre Bras in time. It was now too late for Ney to help Napoleon.

    Marshal d’Erlon’s corps might have played a crucial role that day, but they were stuck between the battles due to the conflicting instructions of Napoleon and Ney, and thus they ended up not fighting in either.

    The day ended with the Prussians being defeated by Napoleon but not destroyed. Prussian General Blücher was thrown to the ground by the Imperial Guard and Baptiste Milhaud’s cuirassiers. He was knocked unconscious while the French cavalrymen rode right by him, and he spent the next ten minutes laying behind the French lines until riding back to join his army on a British Dragoon Guard’s horse. Wellington withdrew to the defensive position of Mont-Saint-Jean in Belgium, the last open ground for battle before Brussels, before the Soignes Forest, while the Prussian army retreated to Wavre. The Prussians lost between 12,000 to 20,000, killed or wounded, compared to 6,500 to 8,500 on the French side.

    Lady Butler, Quatre Bras, 1815.
    Quatre Bras, Lady Butler, 1815.

    Napoleon later said that Wellington had made a poor decision by deciding to fight in this area since he could not have made a well-planned escape via the woodland massif had he been defeated. Napoleon continued his advance on the 17th, this time heading for Mont-Saint-Jean, and gave Grouchy and his 30,000 soldiers the mission of pursuing the Prussians.

    Napoleon pictured several possibilities, but his instructions were still vague about how to act. It was also unclear to Grouchy whether Blücher would choose to join Wellington or withdraw to his lines of communication to the east. The French were right behind the English rearguard, cannoning them with artillery and sabering with cavalry. Even worse, violent thunderstorms broke out in the area, soaking the sunken roads and fields. These storms proved invaluable to the defenders, as they delayed Napoleon’s assault on June 18 and weakened the French artillery as cannonballs sank in the mud rather than ricocheting through the enemy ranks.

    The Battle of Waterloo

    battle of waterloo painting
    Battle of Waterloo by William Sadler

    The Anglo-Dutch-Belgians had 85,000 troops on the day of the conflict, minus the 17,000 detached, for a total of around 68,000 men and 184 guns. There were 127,000 Prussian soldiers. The French, however, fielded just 74,000 soldiers and 266 guns for the Battle of Waterloo.

    The British army was poised for war on June 18, 1815 at first light. Wellington had taken a defensive stance. He deployed his men along the whole 1,9 miles (3 km) of Mont-Saint-Jean, hiding them slightly below the ridge line from the heavy French guns. British artillery was stationed atop the ridge, ready to rain destruction down on any infantry columns that dared attempt to scale the plateau. Finally, Wellington positioned soldiers around three farmhouses on the hill to break the momentum of these assault columns: the Hougoumont farm on the British right-wing (to the west), the La Haye Sainte farm in the middle, and the Papelotte farm on the left wing (to the east).

    Almost half a mile to the south, the French soldiers awoke. Yes, the French troops, like the rest of the Seventh Coalition, had slept outside in the rain. Napoleon and his staff ate breakfast together at the Caillou at 8:00 in the morning. Charles Reille, who had fought with Wellington in Spain (Battle of Vitoria), strongly advocated against a frontal assault because of Wellington’s policy of relying on artillery via relatively thin infantry lines. However, a frontal assault was part of Napoleon’s strategy; after waiting for the sodden terrain to dry up a little due to the weather, he was planning to make an attack on the enemy center with his strong artillery. Just like at Ligny, the temperature quickly got hot and humid.

    It wasn’t until 11.30 a.m. that the cannonade began, and it wasn’t particularly effective since the French guns were so far away (around 4,000 ft or 1,200 m) and most of the British forces were hidden behind the ridge. When Napoleon gave the order to assault the Hougoumont farm in order to distract the British army before attacking the center, his brother, Prince Jerome, operated this initial assault. The position was defended by a Scottish Lieutenant-Colonel, James Macdonnell, who was in charge of 200 Coldstream Guards and 1,000 Germans from Nassau. The fighting was ferocious. The defenders had constructed a fortification around the farm, complete with a wall 6,5 feet (2 meters) high that is riddled with small gaps just like a castle.

    Hougoumont farm
    Nassau troops at Hougoumont farm. (Credit: Jan Hoynck van Papendrecht)

    Lieutenant Legros of the “1st Léger” was able to use an axe to smash through the southern gate and lead a small group of French soldiers into the farm’s fence, but the defenders quickly reopened the gate and slaughtered them. The French left wing wasted their time attempting to capture this secondary objective as Wellington dispatched troops to protect the farm. The defenders lost just 1,000 men during these attacks, while 5,000 Frenchmen died. The British referred to the area in front of the farmhouse as the “killing ground” because of the large number of bodies that had been left there.

    When the first part of the fight was over, Napoleon moved on to the second phase, which included attacking the heart of the enemy’s defenses. Napoleon had General Grouchy retreat because the first Prussian forces were already spotted. Starting at 1:30 p.m., the French infantry launched an assault on the Prussian center, beginning with a furious artillery duel that drove the Dutch-Belgians up the hill and onto the plateau and the defenders of the La Haye Sainte into a defensive encampment. Knowing Wellington’s firepower-based plan, General d’Erlon avoided forming compact columns in favor of extended lines. Wellington’s left flank was threatened when General Durutte advanced all the way to the Papelotte farm.

    But the British (consisting of veterans of the Spanish War) and Hanoverian forces halted the French attack on the ridge by bombarding the exhausted grognards (Napoleon’s Imperial Guards) who had just scaled the plateau. British General Thomas Picton even tried to mount a counterattack, but a musket ball shot him in the head. Wellington’s 1st and 2nd Life Guards, assisted by General Ponsomby’s Dragoon Guards, swooped down on the French General Marcognet division and forced it back to capture the left flank.

    the-Battle-of-Waterloo
    The Royal Scots Greys cavalry on the charge. “Scotland Forever!” by Lady Butler, 1881.

    However, the British cavalry, initially failed in discipline, later caught in the momentum of the Royal Scots Greys cavalry, and continued their push despite the order to withdraw, sabering the French artillery before being caught in a pincer movement by the lancers of Martiguez and the Cuirassiers of Jacques Travers and suffer heavy losses. General Ponsonby was wounded by a spear but survived with the help of a French soldier.

    With the French central assault failing, the Battle of Waterloo entered its third phase at approximately 3:30 p.m., when French artillery began bombarding the La Haye Sainte in preparation for an attack. Several German battalions retreated for cover, but Ney mistook this action for a massive withdrawal. At 4 p.m., he ordered his cavalry to launch a full-scale attack on the enemy’s central stronghold, with Milhaud’s Cuirassiers leading the way. Wellington’s core and right flank saw the gleaming mass of army approaching and organized into around thirty squares in four rows, forming walls of bayonets against the cavalries of the French.

    These infantry squares were fortified by British artillery, which answered the arrival of the French cavalry with deadly fire. Next came the salvos of the infantry, who were provoked to maintain their ground by commanders yelling from the heart of the squares. The batteries were overrun, but although Ney led ferocious attacks for two hours, the British squares held firm. These valiant attacks ultimately failed catastrophically, and Napoleon was frequently blamed for not launching the troops to back up Ney’s cavalry. The remnants of the British cavalry, led by the Earl of Uxbridge (Henry Paget), gave pursuit to the fleeing French.

    Nonetheless, the French infantry was far from idle. The French troops in the southeast were about to confront the approaching Prussians under Friedrich von Bülow, who was closing in on the French Imperial Army’s rear. On the front lines, no one was told about this dreadful news, but they were informed that French General Grouchy was on his way for support. At 6 p.m., combat broke out in the village of Plancenoit, forcing Napoleon to call in the Young Guard, assisted by two battalions of the Old Guard, and ultimately retaking the village of Plancenoit for the French. The French leader Quiot and his troops stormed the Sainte Farm and took it when the defenders ran out of ammunition, as Napoleon had instructed Ney to do so. With the farm’s seizure, French artillery was able to move closer to the British center to unleash a bombardment.

    waterloo british Hussars
    “Waterloo”. Painting by Denis Dighton (1792–1827). British Hussars of Viviene’s Brigade.

    On the other hand, French General Durutte dealt significant damage to the British left flank. Wellington’s situation was dire; his defenses were about to collapse, his cavalry had been wiped out, his supplies were running short, and the Cumberland Hussars had already abandoned the field. “Night or the Prussians must come!” the British commander cried out in desperation. The night was still hours away, but Napoleon knew the Prussian threat was real. The battlefield situation had deteriorated to the point of paralysis, and Napoleon was unable to deploy the reinforcements Ney had been pleading for. Napoleon formed a square with his men on the route to Brussels and sent the Guard to clear Plancenoit.

    Seeking the improbable

    Sir Arthur Wellesley 1st Duke of Wellington
    Sir Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington.

    Then Napoleon could either move back while his Imperial Guard covered the retreat, or he might risk all in a last attack. But Napoleon could only try option two because of the political and strategic need for a victory. At 7 o’clock in the evening, the Imperial Guard launched its last attack, sending 9 battalions to the plateau to clear it of enemy forces. Similarly, Wellington hastily rushed to bolster his center with all of his available reserves. Ney routed the assault columns in the same direction as the cavalry, leaving them vulnerable to the artillery, whereas taking the road to Brussels would have been a safer option. Napoleon’s Imperial Guard advanced in a line up the ridge, showing off their hard training. But after taking a deadly barrage from the British 5th Brigade, the Imperial Guard initially halted but later drove the defenders back.

    The British defenses were on the verge of collapse, but the arrival of the Dutch reinforcements on the second line actually stabilized the situation. And after taking heavy damage from British artillery and the subsequent salvo fire, the Imperial Guard withdrew for the first time in its history. The remainder of the Guard, facing the British, was also wiped out by the salvo fires dropped at about 82 ft (25 m). British Colonel John Colborne placed his soldiers in a long line to the left of the French onslaught, giving them an unobstructed field of fire that annihilated the Imperial Guard.

    With shouts of “The Guard retreats. Run for your life!” spreading panic through the French lines, the French fled to the base of the plateau, and Wellington ordered his forces to advance. After having five horses killed beneath him during the combat, Ney yelled to the British 95th Regiment, “Come and see how a Marshal of France meets his death!” Napoleon and his three battalions of Old Guard were positioned around 330 feet (100 meters) from La Haye Sainte. Several memorialists, including the well-known Jean-Roch Coignet, attested to Ney’s desperation and desire to die on the battlefield.

    Napoleon, giving up, retreated toward La Belle Alliance. The French General Cambronne confronted the English while they invited him to surrender. He famously, and allegedly, answered the English by saying “The Guard dies, it does not surrender.” The village of Plancenoit was still held, but the battalions couldn’t stand any longer against the British army corps. The withdrawal was ordered by Napoleon. The only orderly retreat was made by the Old Guard, who formed two squares and moved backward at a walk. Plancenoit fell to the Prussians at 9 p.m., and Blücher and Wellington met up at La Belle Alliance. Blücher wanted this place to become the name of the battle, but Wellington preferred the village of Waterloo, where his headquarters were found.

    The Battle of Waterloo shattered Napoleon’s reputation forever. According to scholars, Napoleon suffered from painful hemorrhoids since the beginning of the Battle of Waterloo, which stopped him from riding his horse to properly survey the battlefield. But obviously, given the Battle of Waterloo’s outcome, these factors cannot account for the loss on their own. The retreat turned into a debacle. Napoleon lost his ceremonial coat, his treasures, and one of his hats. 

    “Take no prisoners!” That was the Prussian order. 20,000 French soldiers were killed or injured, including seven French generals. Roughly the same number of Coalition soldiers were killed or injured on the opposing side. This number included 7,000 Prussians. The remaining French troops marched towards Charleroi and then Paris through Laon.

    Grouchy’s role in the Battle of Waterloo

    Napoleon and his generals blamed Emmanuel de Grouchy for the loss of the Battle of Waterloo. His inexperience, slowness to respond, and lack of initiative were held against him. Gerard had ordered him to “march to the sound of the guns” at Waterloo to help Napoleon, but he had intentionally held his soldiers back and not joined Napoleon.

    While Napoleon fought at Mont-Saint-Jean, Grouchy went for the Blücher’s Prussians instead, foolishly believing he was still completing his order of stopping the Prussians to join forces with the British. But in reality, Grouchy had faced just one Prussian corps at Wavre instead of four, which the Saxon Thielmann left behind. It was 6 p.m. on this pivotal day when he finally realized it.

    Since Grouchy failed to hold Prussians back at the Wavre, Napoleon’s army was overwhelmed at Waterloo with Wellington and Blücher’s forces joined together.

    Thielmann had accomplished his goal of keeping Grouchy away from the Battle of Waterloo by successfully blocking him in the city of Wavre. The new order that Grouchy received on the 18th was not clear either. It ordered him to continue the combat in Wavre and at the same time to pursue the Prussians toward Waterloo. It was written in pencil and was partly illegible, so no one could tell whether or not the battle had been “engaged” or “won” in Waterloo. Because it would have taken 3 hours for the 1 a.m. order to reach Grouchy, some argue that Grouchy would not have been able to close the 9.3-mile (15-km) gap between himself and Napoleon before the battle in Waterloo ended.

    Once the Battle of Waterloo was finally lost, Grouchy was given the command to return to France through Namur. Grouchy at least deserves recognition for safely returning his army to French soil without losing a single member of his unit.

    When the Battle of Waterloo lost, the Napoleonic government lost

    battles of Ligny

    Within 10 days, Napoleon aimed to muster enough soldiers to mount a defense, as previously planned. Napoleon wanted to assemble 80,000 to 100,000 troops if he could rapidly rally the corps of Grouchy, Jean Rapp, and the Army of the Loire. Enough to delay the coalition forces for long, Napoleon raised a tremendous army, bringing the total number of soldiers fighting for him to 800,000. To expand his constitutional dominion, however, he needed the support of the deputies. But, he had no idea that Joseph Fouché (the Minister of Police), having learned about the Waterloo defeat on June 19, was already attempting to persuade the deputies that Napoleon must abdicate.

    Napoleon regrouped his army around the city of Philippeville and gave the command to Jean-de-Dieu Soult while Emmanuel de Grouchy was still fighting at Wavre. Napoleon then went ahead to organize the defense of Paris as he knew that he could only have an influence on the deputies if he stood there in Paris during the invasion.

    The Napoleonic forces were successful in their operations in Belgium against the Vendée insurgents (War in the Vendée), and in the East, Marshal Suchet repelled the Piedmontese attack and advanced on Geneva. After all, there was still hope. Although his brother Lucien was a skilled politician, Napoleon was unable to maintain the support of the Chambers. Attempting to seize dictatorial power to oversee the last stages of the campaign, he still failed.

    Lucien Bonaparte insisted that dissolving the Chambers was the only option, but Napoleon was uninterested, and the Chamber had proclaimed that any effort to do so would constitute high treason.

    Lazare Carnot advised Napoleon to proclaim a national emergency and mobilize the National Guards in order to regain the momentum of 1792 and 1793 and to fortify his position behind the Loire River in preparation for a counterattack. However, Napoleon’s advisor, Caulaincourt, explained that all would be for naught if Paris were to fall.

    There was still a strong sense of patriotism and will to resist in Northern and Eastern France, where students as young as sixteen were forming artillery companies, including units of snipers called “francs-tireurs” like Colonel Viriot’s “Corps Francs,” who flew a black flag with a skull and crossbones bearing the words “The Terror precedes us. Death follows us.” Patriotic support was actually on the rise, even in historically unsupportive areas like Puy-de-Dôme, where people donated harnessed horses to the army.

    Although only partially, France appeared capable of rising against the Seventh Coalition Army. While the general uprising had its benefits, it also had its drawbacks. The federal associations that were previously formed had brought together not only the Bonapartists but also the “Patriots of 1789” and “Terrorists of 1793,” who were committed to preventing the Bourbon Restoration, but they were not loyal to the imperial monarchy either.

    And added to all this, the majority of French people were actually weary of the conflicts of the Revolution and the Empire, and they were desiring peace quickly. There was reluctance to deploy mobile guards in several areas, including Ariège, Haute-Loire, and Oise. Having been burned by 1814, the France of 1815 was quite different from the France of 1792. The peasants had fled before the approach of the Seventh Coalition, and the cities had not put up a violent opposition. Worse, not only in the Vendée but across the country, there was outspoken royalist support. Some royalists were already plotting a tyrannicide behind the scenes to assassinate Napoleon; provincial lords were bribing the mobilized troops, and businesspeople were even hoping King Louis XVIII would return so that they could resume profitable commerce with England again.

    Napoleon was unable to enforce military recruitments in the face of widespread opposition; inexperienced prefects had been appointed during the political cleansing of the Hundred Days, and many royalist mayors had been allowed to stay in post in the communes.

    Napoleon’s political situation had stalled, and Fouché was already making plans for the post-Empire era. The Chamber of Representatives granted itself sovereign rights and forced Napoleon to abdicate or face a coup. 

    In the face of the civil war threat and despite the support of a portion of the Parisian population that came to demonstrate its love for Napoleon in the vicinity of the Élysée, Napoleon, not wanting to turn into the “King of a Jacquerie” (a popular revolt of the 14th century), abdicated on June 22, 1815, withdrawing to Château de Malmaison.

    Then, Carnot, Grenier, Caulaincourt, and Quinette formed a temporary government, with Fouché as their leader. Although Napoleon’s son Napoleon II was the disputed new Emperor of France, Fouché already had the support of the English on the capitulation of Paris and the restoration of the Bourbons.

    The defense of Paris

    The march of the Seventh Coalition to Paris was littered with battles, some of which went in favor of the French but which had since been forgotten due to the lack of strategic significance in the shadow of Waterloo’s devastating defeat. On June 20th, Grouchy won a decisive victory against the Prussians, who had been tailing him for too long.

    Le Quesnoy, guarded by the National Guard, fell to the Coalition forces on the 26th. On the 27th, d’Erlon gained a decisive victory against Ziethen’s Prussians at Compiègne, while Bülow took both Senlis and Creil. After the Coalition soldiers prevailed on all fronts on June 28, Blücher planned to assault Paris from the north on June 30 as they were around 30 miles (50 km) away from the capital. But after being driven back by the Parisian defenses, Blücher regrouped to the west and south of Paris.

    Food and ammunition were not an issue for Davout in Paris, and he was confident in his ability to resist Blücher. Nonetheless, Davout was well aware of the immediate need for a second restoration of Louis XVIII. He sent Isidore Exelmans’ second cavalry corps to quell the Prussians’ will. There were 16 Dragoon, 6 Hussar, and 8 light Imperial Guard cavalry squadrons along with the 4 battalions of the 44th Line Infantry Regiment ready for a charge.

    Colonel Sohr’s brigade was smashed by Exelmans’ surprise attack on their way to Vélizy, where they had a numerical advantage of seven to one (about 5,000 to 750). After losing the fight, Colonel Sohr and 300 of his troops were captured. 

    After the Prussian vanguard was defeated at Rocquencourt, the Belgium campaign came to an end three days later with the signing of an armistice. However, the war in France continued, and the Château de Vincennes was not given up until November 15, 1815, when General Daumesnil agreed to do so.

    For his part, Napoleon traveled to Rochefort after proposing, in vain, to assume command of the Government Commission’s armed forces as a mere general. For a long time, Napoleon had hoped to be able to escape into exile in America, but on July 3 he found out that he had been denied and the British navy was blocking the coast. Since Napoleon knew that Fouché might hand him to the royalists, he surrendered to the English in the hopes that they would be more forgiving. Napoleon waited on the Island of Aix as Louis XVIII entered Paris on July 8, marking the second restoration of King Louis XVIII. On July 14, Napoleon embarked on the Bellerophon and made his way to Plymouth before setting sail for Saint Helena, the burial place of the Emperor, where Napoleon died from stomach cancer on 5 May 1821.

    The legacy of the Battle of Waterloo

    Within a short time, the Battle of Waterloo had become a cultural touchstone, remembered by every participant. And thus, on June 18th, Wellington held a feast to celebrate the triumph, which continued until 1857. Waterloo has been honored by the naming of several public structures, including barracks and a well-known London Waterloo Train Station.

    Napoleon’s final battle, the Battle of Waterloo was as brutal as it was spoken about. The accounts of the combat were recorded in the memoirs of the participants, such as Marcellin Marbot. In addition, Napoleon’s own account of his failed political endeavor in the Belgian lowlands was published in 1823 in the Memorial of Saint Helena. This imperial epic worthy of the ancient tragedies became the bedtime reading of a generation of young romantics bored by the blandness of their own era.

    Despite being a staunch royalist and previously a firm enemy of Napoleon, the writer Chateaubriand became a passionate supporter of Napoleon and delivered the narrative of how he went through the Battle of Waterloo. Victor Hugo succeeded Chateaubriand in continuing to deliver more Napoleonic memories. Exiled following Napoleon III’s coup in 1853, Hugo composed the most beautiful verses and, perhaps, the most renowned lines about the Battle of Waterloo in his Les Châtiments (“Castigations”):

    Waterloo! Waterloo! disastrous field!
    Like a wave swelling in an urn brim-filled,
    Your ring of hillsides, valleys, woods and heath
    Saw grim battalions snarled in pallid death.
    On this side France, against her Europe stood:
    God failed the heroes in the clash of blood!
    Fate played the coward, victory turned tail.
    O Waterloo, alas! I weep, I fail!
    Those last great soldiers of the last great war
    Were giants, each the whole world's conqueror:
    Crossed Alps and Rhine, made twenty tyrants fall.
    Their soul sang in the brazen bugle-call!
    
    —Les Châtiments ("Castigations,") translated by the English poet and translator Timothy Adès

    After going out of his way to visit the battlefield of Waterloo in 1861, Victor Hugo wrote a collection of poems named “The Legend of the Ages,” which included “The Emperor’s Return.”

    Erckmann-Chatrian‘s most popular historical fiction, Waterloo, was published in 1865 during the Second French Empire, which followed the previous Histoire d’un Conscrit de 1813 (The History Of A Conscript Of 1813). They added a touch of epic and reality to this work in a style that has been defined as rustic realism, in which basic and familiar individuals become heroes of the epic.

    Among the founders of realism in European literature, Balzac also planned to write on the history of the Napoleonic Wars and the tragic myth of Waterloo.

    References

    1. The Champ de Mai · Napoleon’s 100 Days
    2. David Hamilton-Williams, (1993), “Waterloo New Perspectives: The Great Battle Reappraised.”
    3. J. Christopher Herold, (1967), “The Battle of Waterloo.”
    4. Victor Hugo, (1862), “Chapter VII: Napoleon in a Good Humor”, Les Misérables.
    5. Brown University Library, “Napoleonic Satires.”
    6. Bernard Cornwell, (2015), “Waterloo: The History of Four Days, Three Armies and Three Battles.”