Author: Hrothsige Frithowulf

  • History of Japan: From the Origins to the Medieval Period

    History of Japan: From the Origins to the Medieval Period

    The samurai is one of the most iconic figures associated with the history of medieval Japan. One of the most intriguing and memorable eras in the history of the Empire of the Rising Sun is the time of feudalism and civil wars. But all that preceded was plunged into the shade. As the 19th century drew to a close, the question of how Japan developed into a feudal empire sparked widespread interest. Together, let’s explore the ancient Japanese past, from prehistory to the rise of the imperial shogunate.

    At the Dawn of Japanese History: The Jōmon Period (14000 BC–300 BC)

    Reconstruction of a Yayoi period house in Kyushu.
    Reconstruction of a Yayoi period house in Kyushu.

    The Shinto goddess Amaterasu was said to have provided the divine ancestry for the Japanese imperial family, giving them the right to rule the country. The Empire was just imperial in name at first, though.

    While evidence of human habitation in Japan can be traced back to before 14,000 BC, the archipelago did not begin to take shape until around 300 BC. Peasants and fishermen made up the vast majority of Japan’s population at the time, and they lived in seasonal settlements that migrated across the country. The people who lived during the Jōmon period were known as “the market gardeners’ civilization” because they engaged in fishing, hunting, and primitive types of agriculture.

    There was no such thing as money at the time, but jade daggers, ceramics, and shell-crafted things were beginning to emerge as popular handicrafts. Dogû is a kind of elaborate pottery that was discovered during the late Jōmon period, about 400 BC. There is no doubt that these works of art originated in Japan.

    There was no Buddhism there at the time, just diverse shamanic rituals. It was believed that shamans could tap into the unseen realm and predict the future. They pray for prosperous harvests, appease the spirits, and protect against natural disasters and bad forces.

    Japan and China: The Yayoi Period (300 BC–300 CE)

    A Yayoi period dōtaku bell, 3rd century AD
    A Yayoi period dōtaku bell, 3rd century AD.

    A dramatic shift in Japanese culture occurred at the start of the Yayoi period, about 300 BC. At this time, Shintoism was developing, governmental structures were being put in place, and trade with China was beginning to take place. The Yayoi, who came in from northern Kyûshu, the southernmost of the four main islands that make up the Japanese archipelago, were the ones who introduced these novelties.

    Around 100 BC, Japan began producing its first metal goods, while the raw materials presumably originated in Korea. Communication with the Chinese and Koreans brought metalworking techniques, including bronze and iron, to Japan. Rapidly spreading from its origins in northern Kyushu, this groundbreaking idea has already changed the face of the whole island. Iron tools were put to use in farming, and the subsequent rise of the rice culture isolated and confined the rural population to their fields and homes made of mud and straw. Also, this system was only possible because of the rise of the settled population.

    Landowners accumulated wealth, passed it down through the generations, and it increased the power of the ruling clan. Over time, they developed into something like feudal lords, complete with the power to impose taxes as well as administer justice and religious ceremonies. It was during this period that the first clans emerged. This aristocratic class’s religious function also bolstered their influence in politics. It was only they who had access to the holy items, could communicate with the other side, and understood the rituals of worship to the letter. The respect and admiration of others are a direct result of this accomplishment, further solidifying their position as leaders. Since bronze was less practical than iron for agricultural labor, it was relegated to the role of a symbol used in ceremonies, which eventually became an integral part of the governmental system.

    In other words, the Yayoi era did not mark the end of the old shamanistic practices that had existed since the Jōmon period. Shinto, a religion with animist and polytheist elements, is still widely practiced in modern Japan. Shinto was founded on the idea that there were “6 million gods,” also known as kami (or spirits), who resided inside of everything and stood for each natural element. For instance, the fox deity Inari Ōkami, who was revered for his role in the harvest, was one of the most important kami.

    In order to ensure a bountiful crop, they prayed to him. Shinto’s emphasis on cleanliness was similar to that of other religions. A person must periodically pray and do particular rites to rid themselves of their impurities (kegara), or else they will bring unhappiness and disaster upon themselves and everyone around them. The foundational myths of Japan, such as that the goddess Izanami and the god Izanagi created the country, have their origins in the Shinto faith.

    The Japanese, who were known as the Wa at the time, first appeared in written Chinese. The fabled empress Himiko of Yamataitoku, who served as temporal ruler and high priestess, is said to have founded the empire around the third century (yet another fusion of spiritual and temporal powers). This empress may have existed, and she may have had some bearing on the later Yamato rule (from which the renowned battleship Yamato takes its name), although none of these claims have been verified.

    The Emerging Empire: The Kofun Period (300 AD–538 AD)

    The Nintoku mausoleum in Sakai, Osaka prefecture, Japan, part of the Mozu-Furuichi group of ancient burial sites known as kofun.
    The Nintoku mausoleum in Sakai, Osaka prefecture, Japan, part of the Mozu-Furuichi group of ancient burial sites known as kofun (Source: KYODO, Japan Times).

    Towards the end of the 3rd century, gradually emerges what would later become the imperial house: the Yamato court. The clans in the Bizen region, along the shores of the Inland Sea, gain power to the extent of establishing their dominance over the southern part of Honshu and a portion of northern Kyushu. The dominant clans include Soga, Katsuraki, Heguri, and Koze, later joined by the Kibi clans of Izumo (further northwest), Otomo, Mononobe, Nakatomi, and Inbe.

    Each of these clans retains leadership in its region (kuni) but unites with others under the direction of the Yamato court. The Soga, Mononobe, and Otomo clans are particularly influential. Each claims imperial and/or divine lineage. The Katsuraki, initially the most powerful, had to yield to the Otomo, who endorsed Emperor Keitai during a succession dispute at the end of the 5th century.

    The Yamato court developed its own administration, introducing positions such as the Minister of the Treasury. While the Emperor allowed clans relative autonomy on their lands, his authority was absolute, with even clan leaders submitting to his will. In practice, certain clans held more influence, often due to marital alliances with the Emperor’s family.

    The aristocracy, comprising clan members under the leadership of their patriarch, was granted the first hereditary noble titles. Advanced military techniques, including cavalry, emerged, and sword usage also originated during this period.

    The Yamato court became a key interlocutor with Korean kingdoms and the Middle Kingdom. By the late 5th century, the Emperor of Wa (Japan) began paying tribute to the Chinese Emperor, who, in return, recognized him as sovereign.

    Chinese and Koreans migrated to the archipelago, forming entire clans like the Hata clan, consisting of Chinese descendants of the Qin dynasty, or the Takamuko clan. Korean princes were sent as hostages to the Japanese court in exchange for military support against the Manchu tribes.

    This influx of population had unforeseen consequences, notably introducing Buddhism to the archipelago and disrupting Japanese traditions.

    As the Yamato era concluded, Japan stood as a well-established empire, recognized by neighbors despite its distinct Shinto-based culture and political system. However, with the arrival of Buddhism and ensuing reforms, Japan entered its imperial period, commencing with the Asuka era.

    The Yamato court, which had its beginnings in the fifth century, grew into the imperial court of Japan during the next six centuries, becoming more dominant both domestically and internationally. It all started with a series of changes in the sixth and seventh centuries that completely altered the country’s political structure. During this period of imperial rule, the arts, cultural and spiritual traditions, and even the written language advanced, despite the fact that war was uncommon. Without a doubt, the six centuries between the beginning of the Heian period and the end of the Muromachi period were the Golden Age of the Empire of the Rising Sun, which became known as Japan during this time (Nihon). However, the shift between the Emperor’s ascension to power and his consolidation of that authority was characterized by a wave of changes that were essential to the Empire’s survival.

    Shōtoku Taishi’s Reforms (587–628)

    At the beginning of the 6th century, the Yamato court was the scene of intense political intrigue. Little by little, the Soga clan, thanks to its marriage to the imperial family, succeeded in establishing itself, pushing aside the Katsuraki, Heguri, and Koze clans, and above all, to the detriment of the Mononobe and Nakatomi clans, who contested the establishment of Buddhism. But we’ll come back to this later.

    By 587, the Soga clan was sufficiently powerful to allow its leader, Soga no Umako, to install his nephew on the throne and rule through this straw man (or rather child), with the help of prince regent Shotoku Taishi (574-622). Later, the emperor, showing too much inclination towards independence, was assassinated and replaced by Empress Suiko (593-628). Shotoku Taishi was the first to introduce reform.

    A devout Buddhist and a great connoisseur of Chinese literature, he drew inspiration from the Confucian principles governing government in the Middle Kingdom and applied them to Japanese reality. Shotoku Taishi introduced the concept of the Mandate of Heaven, according to which the Emperor holds his power by divine right and reigns according to the will of heaven. He also drew up a seventeen-article constitution, emphasizing the value of harmony and the Buddha’s teachings, the absolute priority of imperial orders over all other considerations, and praising the Confucian virtues of devotion and obedience.

    This “constitution”—a  debatable term, given that it does not really lay down the institutional foundations of the state but rather its guiding principles in moral and spiritual terms—is accompanied by a revolution in the system of ranks and etiquette, which, however laughable it may seem from the outside, is of major importance in a highly ritualized political system.

    To complete the “Sinicization” of Japan, Buddhist temples were built, the Chinese calendar was adopted, and a new administrative unit inspired by the Chinese model came into force, the Gokishichido (5 cities, 7 roads). Students and diplomatic missions were sent to China, then under the rule of the Tang dynasty. However, although relations were more regular and intense, particularly on a cultural level, than during the Kofûn period, it was also at this time that rivalries between China and Japan developed. Indeed, messages from the Emperor of the Rising Sun to the Emperor of the Middle are now addressed as equals, as Japan no longer considers itself a vassal of its Chinese neighbor.

    By the time Shotoku Taishi and Soga no Umako died, leaving the Soga clan to pull the strings of an Empire, Chinese culture had permeated Japanese customs and politics. Regarded with suspicion by the people, particularly Buddhist rites, these traditions from elsewhere were nevertheless to become an important part of the unique culture developed by Japan over the centuries that followed.

    The Taika Reforms

    The Soga clan, despite its period of success, did not survive long after the death of Shotoku Taishi. In the year 645, palace intrigues led to a coup d’état aimed at ending Soga’s grip on power. The Isshi Incident, also known as the Naka no Oe Uprising and Nakatomi no Kamatari (the clan that would later become the Fujiwara clan), signaled the start of the Taika Reforms, which means “Great Change.”

    As control was no longer inherited, the central government initially confiscated land. Each generation, the lands were handed over to the imperial administration, responsible for their redistribution. Naturally, this meant that a family losing imperial favor could be reduced to nothing at a moment’s notice. Similarly, the hereditary titles of clan leaders were also deprived of hereditary transmission.

    Subsequently, taxes on crops, silk, fabrics, and cotton were imposed to finance the expansion of the administration. A labor duty was instituted for the creation of a militia and the construction of public buildings. Finally, the division into Gokishichido was abolished, and the country was divided into provinces, led by governors accountable only to the imperial administration. Districts and townships were established to exert even more control over the country’s administration.

    Additionally, the Emperor and his supporters, particularly the Kamatari, focused on establishing the ritsuryo, a set of penal and administrative rules. The ritsuryo was written in several stages: the Ômi code, the first version, was completed in 668; the Asuka Kiyomihara code in 689; and the latest version, the Taihô code, completed in 701, remained in effect with minor modifications until 1868. The penal code resembled a Confucian code, favoring lighter punishments over severe penalties.

    The administrative code established the Jingi-kan, a body dedicated to court rituals and Shinto traditions, and the Daijo-kan, which created eight ministries for central administration, ceremonies, the imperial household, civil affairs, justice, the military, public affairs, and the treasury. This highly effective tool strengthened the imperial house’s ability to govern the country, contributing to the stabilization of its power.

    The Introduction of Buddhism in Japan

    The introduction of Buddhism to Japan likely occurred through immigration from the Korean Peninsula. In the 6th century, close relations between the Yamato court and Korean kingdoms developed, particularly after Japan’s intervention to support the Baekje kingdom against Mongol invaders. In 538, the first delegation was sent to Japan to spread the Buddhist faith. Initially embraced by the Soga clan and subsequently transmitted to the aristocracy, Buddhism faced resistance from the common people, supported by the Nakatomi and Mononobe clans.

    As Buddhist traditions gained ground, Shinto traditions declined. Imperial decree forbade the burials known as “kofun,” or keyhole-shaped tumuli. The consumption of meat, including horses, birds, and dogs, was also forbidden.

    Moreover, Buddhism was not the sole philosophy to make its way to the archipelago. In the mid-7th century, the first Japanese Taoist monastery was built on Mount Tonomine. Some imperial burials adopted the octagonal shape, symbolizing universal order in Taoism and indicating the strength of its influence.

    As the Asuka period concluded, the empire was firmly established, with clans and the populace devoted; political stability prevailed; and the archipelago remained unscarred by conflicts. Such prosperity led the Japanese Empire to view itself as equal to the Middle Kingdom. A real cultural flowering was about to take place in what is now known as the Empire of the Rising Sun.

    The Nara era commenced with the establishment, in the year 710 CE, of Japan’s first permanent capital in the city of Nara, located in the central part of the country. The Asuka era reforms gave rise to an imperial bureaucracy, which also settled in Nara. Rapidly, the city became Japan’s primary urban center, hosting a population of 200,000 people.

    This urbanization, bringing together thinkers and artists from across the country, facilitated a genuine cultural explosion. During this period, imported Chinese culture associated with Buddhism waned, despite the capital being planned similarly to the Chinese Tang Dynasty capital, and was replaced by an original Japanese culture. Concurrently, the permanence of the imperial court heightened palace intrigues and power struggles. While the Nara and Heian eras are synonymous with cultural blossoming in Japan, they are also inseparable from the decline of imperial power and the onset of the first clan wars.

    Development of Japanese Arts and Culture

    The first sign of cultural renewal is the abandonment, starting in 710, of the titles and court attire of the Chinese tradition. Beauty standards evolve, and both aristocratic men and women powder their faces to whiten their skin and blacken their teeth. Men adopt the practice of wearing a thin mustache, while women paint their lips scarlet, all in an effort to approach the divine “perfection” described in Shinto pantheon legends. The first complex court robes also make their appearance, known as “junihitoe,” consisting of multiple layers of fabrics arranged according to a complex code based on the season and sacred festivals.

    Artistically, the major development of these two eras was undoubtedly literary. Although Chinese remained the court language, the emergence of “kanas”—characters  designed to express nuances, typically Japanese—led to an explosion of literature. The first major works emerged at the beginning of the Nara era, with the Kojiki (712) and the Nihon Shoki (724), the first imperial chronicles. Later, fictional works such as the famous Tale of Genji, the first Japanese novel, and The Pillow Book by Sei Shonagon, one of the earliest female authors, were written. Poetry also experienced impressive growth. Japanese poems, known as waka, flourished during this time, as being a poet was a mark of an enlightened and serene spirit. Fujiwara no Teika, Murasaki Shikibu, and Saigyo are among the famous poets.

    To fully grasp the significance of literary creations during this period, the current national anthem of Japan, “Kimi Ga Yo,” was written during the early Heian era, around 800.

    Buddhism in the Empire of the Rising Sun

    During the Nara period in Japan, as Chinese traditions fell into disuse and the Tang dynasty’s court was considered decadent, Buddhism, imported from China, did not follow the same decline. Well-established in the archipelago, the Buddhist clergy engaged in a rapid process of adaptation to Japanese reality. Despite being closely connected to the emperors and empresses of Nara, this adaptation did not occur without posing some challenges.

    At the beginning of the Nara era, Buddhism gained significant prominence. A vast monastic complex, the Todaiji temple, was constructed with a colossal bronze statue of Buddha at its center, known as Daibutsu, towering over 16 meters in height. Assimilated to the representation of the Sun Goddess, Amaterasu, this statue synthesized Buddhism from the continent with the older traditions of Shinto, native to Japan. Still visible in Nara, it remains a highly esteemed monument for both Japanese and foreign tourists. Provincial temples, called kokubunji, were established to extend the influence of Buddhism to rural regions where Shinto still held strong roots.

    The archipelago’s oldest monasteries also date back to this period, such as the grand monastery on Mount Hiei, built by the Tendai Buddhist sect, closely associated with the emperor and basing its doctrine on the Lotus Sutra. Cultural achievements and artistic works from the Buddhist world found their way to Japan, notably the Shoso-in temple, which archived sacred texts from as far back as the early caravanserais of Central Asia on the Silk Road. The development of religious art played a crucial role in Buddhism’s influence in Japan, encompassing silk paintings, Buddhist statues, temple decorations (mandalas), sculpture, and calligraphy.

    Buddhism: State Religion? No, but…

    During the Heian period in Japan, Buddhism ceased to be the state religion but remained a means for the imperial family to uphold and expand its power and influence. Empress Kôken (749–758) invited a large number of Buddhist priests to the court during her reign. Even after her abdication in 758, she maintained strong ties with the clergy, particularly with a priest named Dokyô. When her cousin Nakamaro of Fujiwara rebelled against her, she successfully defeated him, subsequently dethroning the reigning emperor and ascending to the throne as Empress Shotoku (764–770). These actions shocked the court and led to the exclusion of women from the succession line. The clergy’s involvement is evident, as the empress, in gratitude for her victory, had nearly a million wooden charms manufactured.

    In the later Heian era, the Tendai and Kukai Buddhist sects garnered support from numerous aristocrats, including Emperor Kammu, a staunch admirer of Tendai. Both sects aimed to connect the clergy and the state, believing that their religious conduct required influencing political decisions. During this period, the clergy’s land holdings grew in importance. Enjoying tax exemptions due to their religious status, monasteries also caused significant financial losses, threatening the imperial administration’s financial stability.

    While there was a cultural explosion during the Nara period and the early Heian era, which was characterized by the development of modern Japanese writing and the influence of Buddhism, cracks started to appear during what appeared to be the heyday of imperial power. These fissures persisted throughout the Heian era, ultimately leading to the fall of the Empire and the rise of the shogunate.

    The transition from the Nara era to the Heian era, though seemingly inconspicuous, carried significant implications. In 794, the capital was once again moved, this time from Nara to Kyoto (then known as Heian-kyô). Built on a larger scale but following the same plan as Nara, Kyoto stood as a monumental symbol of the imperial era’s flourishing.

    Emperor Kammu chose Kyoto to strengthen the seat of imperial power, considering its better access to the sea, a river route, and, most importantly, its proximity to the eastern provinces. By establishing the government’s seat there, Kammu aimed to make it a strong power center that would extend imperial dominance across the archipelago. Military victories in the northeastern part of Honshu marked an initial step toward success, but the seeds of the decline of imperial authority were already present.

    The Fujiwara Regency

    Emperor Kammu, who seemed to be leading the Empire towards power, died in 806, leaving behind a powerful throne but a disputed succession. At exactly the same time, the great noble families began to regain their lost power from the reforms of the sixth century. Farmers and independent peasants who owned their own land since these reforms found it more advantageous to sell their property titles to these families. They would then work on these lands as sharecroppers in exchange for a fraction of the harvest. The result of this trend was that the extent of land controlled by the nobles was rapidly expanding. These lands formed “shōen,” large parcels, overseen by a manor or a castle.

    This was somewhat reminiscent of the existing feudal system in Europe, except that the peasants were not serfs tied to their land. Furthermore, while peasants could not escape the controls on their heritage and tax collection, the great noble families were politically powerful enough to obtain substantial reductions in their taxes. A similar situation existed for monastic institutions. Monasteries also began to form shōen, becoming a significant factor in the country’s economy.

    Gradually, emperors lost the absolute control they had over the administration as the Empire’s financial resources dwindled. The Fujiwara family, one of the most powerful noble families in Japan, which owned immense cultivable areas in the north of the country, gradually approached the seat of power, particularly through marriages with the imperial family. During the ninth century, the Fujiwara took the lead in the Imperial Cabinet, and several of them assumed the role of regent. The management of the Empire’s affairs gradually fell under the control of their family administration, which also managed their land holdings. The Fujiwara family surpassed imperial officials at all levels.

    While other clans did not have an administrative machine as extensive as the Fujiwara, they nevertheless developed their own administration. The foundations of the feudal system were already in place.

    The Rise of the Military Class

    As the finances of the Empire collapsed, maintaining a substantial imperial army became increasingly problematic. Gradually, the management of military affairs became as much, if not more, the responsibility of noble families than the imperial administration. The shōen, in fact, were both the reason and the means to develop armed forces: they enabled the payment and sustenance of troops, who, among other duties, defended against raiders and the incursions of the Emishi (tribes in northern Japan). Private militias, whether under the command of noble families or religious orders, marked the emergence of a new social class—the warriors (bushi), later known as samurai (those who serve).

    The larger families, controlling more extensive lands, also possessed the most numerous armies and consequently received military titles and corresponding prestige from the imperial court. Clans such as Taira, Fujiwara, and Minamoto, in particular, took center stage in the military arena. A tense situation developed, with each clan wary of the others, yet none taking the initiative for open conflict. Eventually, the balance was disrupted by Emperor Go-Sanjô (1068–1073).

    Unlike several of his predecessors, Emperor Go-Sanjô managed to diminish the power of the Fujiwara. He established an official land registry, and as a significant portion of Fujiwara lands had not been properly recorded with authorities after being acquired from small landowners, the Fujiwara clan lost a substantial portion of its lands and income.

    The Hôgen Rebellion (1156), supported by the Taira and Minamoto, further dispossessed the Fujiwara of their dominant position, compelling them to retreat to their northern strongholds. While they retained their official positions, the Emperor regained control of the administration, establishing an imperial council composed of abdicated emperors. Internal divisions within the clan accelerated its decline. For the first time, a war had brought an end to the power of a major clan.

    The Genpei War, 1180–1185

    Minamoto no Yoritomo, from an 1179 hanging scroll by Fujiwara no Takanobu.
    Minamoto no Yoritomo, from an 1179 hanging scroll by Fujiwara no Takanobu.

    The Gempei War was Japan’s first true civil war, and it occurred shortly after the collapse of the Fujiwara, a family that had been pushed to the political outside. From 1180 on, this one battled against the Minamoto and Taira dynasties. There were indicators of an impending big battle going back many decades. The Minamoto initially rebelled against Taira rule of the imperial court in 1160, during the Heiji rebellion, but were soon put down.

    The Taira clan, led by the legendary Taira no Kiyomori, controlled imperial politics during the period. He had the nerve to become clan chief and then seize control of modern-day Kobe, the hub of the busiest commerce route between Song China and Kyoto, the imperial capital. Because of this, he was able to provide a comfortable lifestyle for his loved ones while still advancing his career and gaining influence. Kiyomori created and unmade monarchs (Nijo, Rokujo, Takaku) as he pleased in his role as Daijo Daijin (Chief Minister of the government, second in power only to the Emperor) and administrator of the Empire.

    By doing so, the Taira earned the enmity of many in the court who were envious of their authority. Assisted by the Minamoto family, Prince Mochihito, brother of the deposed Emperor Gosanjo, started the war in an effort to end the Taira dynasty’s rule. When Mochihito issued a summons to arms, the latter responded by relocating the capital to Fukuhara (current-day Kobe), which was inside the center of their fief.

    In the summer of 1180, troops from both families converged, and in the first fight, at Uji, the Minamoto were utterly defeated. Despite the assistance of the warrior-monks of the Mount Hiei monasteries, Prince Mochihito and the Minamoto clan chief, Minamoto no Yorimosa, were both slaughtered. The Taira forces besieged and ultimately destroyed most of these monasteries. The Minamoto were beaten for the second time on September 14, 1180, in Ishibashiyama, and so they withdrew to their seaside stronghold of Kamakura. Taira no Kiyomori passed away in February of the following year, putting his youngest son in line to become shogun. With both forces separated by hundreds of kilometers and experiencing supply issues due to weak crops, fighting froze in the spring of 1181.

    After two years of doing nothing, the army resumed its advance in the spring of 1183. Although the Minamoto were unprepared and their warriors were untrained, the Taira were nonetheless totally destroyed by them at Kurikara. With time, the Taira were unable to escape Kyoto and were forced to retreat to their homelands in western Honshu and Shikoku. Infighting between Yoshinaka and Yoshitsune, two members of the Minamoto family, over who would rule the clan meant that the Taira never fully recovered from the catastrophes of 1183.

    Battle of Ichi-no-Tani folding screen
    Battle of Ichi-no-Tani folding screen.

    After besieging Ichi no Tani and Dan no ura, they were eventually defeated in the naval battle of Shimonoseki in the Inland Sea. After the Taira family was annihilated, the Kamakura Shogunate took power. The chief of the Minamoto clan became Japan’s military dictator, known as the Shogun. As a result of this conflict, the emperors were demoted to the role of symbolic figures, while the shogun assumed practical control for the next 500 years. The samurai emerged as Japan’s new elite class when the country entered its feudal period.

    Battle of Dan-no-ura
    Battle of Dan-no-ura.

    In 1185, the Minamoto clan triumphed over the Taira clan and became the dominant family in the Japanese archipelago. The Taira family’s former dominance and influence over the government were history. However, the war proved the superiority of military might over imperial control. For a long time, samurai were seen as little more than powerless slaves, but over time, they started to establish a warrior caste and assume more responsibilities. Shortly after the Minamoto triumph, the imperial court reinforced this status quo by bestowing upon Minamoto no Yoritomo the title of Seii Tai Shogun, therefore vesting absolute authority in him.

    Emergence of the Samurai: The Kamakura Period (1185–1333)

    A Japanese painting on silk in a traditional style of a Samurai warrior riding a horse. Image: Pinterest.
    A Japanese painting on silk in a traditional style of a Samurai warrior riding a horse. Image: Pinterest.

    The Kamakura era began in 1185, when Minamoto no Yoritomo, the first shogun in centuries, established the seat of his so-called bakufu government (tent government, in reference to the fact that military chiefs held power there) in Kamakura, some 50 kilometers from present-day Tokyo. As with any new regime, Yoritomo’s first priority was to consolidate his power. He created three ministries essential to the governance of the state. The first dealt with finance and administration. The second dispensed justice in times of peace and organized the raising of troops from the shogun’s vassals in times of war. The latter ensured that the shogun’s decisions were implemented.

    The Kamakura shogunate’s other source of power came from the lands under its control. After the defeat of the Taira, much of the land in central and western Japan came under Minamoto’s control via confiscation. The Minamotos then distributed these lands among those who would become their vassals, thereby securing their loyalty. This was the birth of the feudal system and of the samurai caste, made up of landowners and their vassals who had sworn loyalty and fought for their lord.

    As he established this new system, Yoritomo found himself fighting against those who resisted these changes. The Fujiwara clan, which owned most of the land in northern Japan, was deeply rooted in traditional values. They saw the Minamotos as upstarts who endangered imperial power itself. Moreover, the Fujiwara refused to be accountable to those they saw as rivals. Eventually, the situation degenerated into a new civil war, much faster than the previous one, which ended in 1189 with the defeat of Fujiwara no Yasuhira and the end of Fujiwara’s power, which never recovered.

    When Yoritomo died ten years later, in 1199, Japan’s political landscape was unrecognizable. While the old imperial court remained in Kyoto, the new Minamoto vassal landowning families had regrouped at the Kamakura court. For the first time, there were two true centers of power in Japan. But, Yoritomo’s death was also the beginning of the end for the Minamotos.

    The internal dissension that had already manifested itself during the war against the Taira resumed with a vengeance. His son Yoriie succeeded him as head of the clan but proved unable to maintain Minamoto’s hold on the shogunate. In the early years of the 13th century, a warrior clan, the Hôjô, seized the post of Regent (Shikken) and created the posts of Tokuso and Renshô, titles that were normally honorary but which they used to strip the Minamoto shogun of his prerogatives. The Hôjo were, de facto, the new masters of shogunal power.

    Although the position of the shogun had been created in honor of those who defended imperial power, the shogun had gradually come to encroach on the emperor’s power. In 1221, Emperor Gô-Toba declared the second Hojo regent, Yoshitoki, an outlaw and went to war against the shogunate. The Hojo clan and its allies crushed the imperial forces in less than a month, exiling Gô-Toba and his sons. This revolt, known as the Jokyû Incident, marked the end of imperial power, with the emperor reduced to a symbolic role.

    The Hojo kings established the Council of State in 1225, a new political structure where the other lords shared legislative and judicial authority. This sharing of power in no way diminished the importance of the shogun and regent and enabled them to give other clans the opportunity to exercise a share of power, reducing the risk of a coup d’état. In 1232, a new legal code was established. Unlike the rules in force until then, which were based entirely on the theories of Confucius, this code, the Goseibai Shikimoku, focused on the creation of laws and precise punishments according to crimes and was devoid of any philosophical scope while being much clearer and more practical to use.

    The Hojo regents maintained absolute authority for around fifty years. Until the first Mongol invasion of Japan in 1274… In 1268, the Mongols, under Kublai Khan, created the Yuan dynasty and began ruling China. The latter desired to include Japan among his vassal states and hence issued an ultimatum demanding that Japan surrender and pay tribute. The Hojo regents promptly rejected the ultimatum. In 1274, about 23,000 Mongols, Chinese, and Koreans arrived on the northern part of Kyushu in a fleet of 600 ships, armed with grenades that had never been seen in Japan before.

    The samurai quickly lost ground, unaccustomed to the group formations employed by the Mongol officers. However, a typhoon ravaged the Mongol fleet less than a day after landing. In 1281, Kublai Khan launched a second invasion, but the fleet was once again wiped out by a typhoon after an apparently successful landing and a few weeks of fighting in Kyushu. Japanese Shinto priests called these typhoons the kamikaze, the divine winds that come to defend Japan against foreign invaders.

    However, typhoons were probably not the only cause of Kublai’s defeat. The remains of ships found at the site show many defects. It is thought that Chinese and Korean shipbuilders, hoping to shake off the Mongol yoke, built vessels adapted to river navigation, not to the high seas, let alone storms. As a result, many ships sank where ships with more suitable hulls would have resisted.

    The invasions had not left the archipelago unscathed. The financial cost of raising troops and preparing for defense had led to new taxes, and the Hojo regency was becoming less and less popular. To make matters worse, bands of ronin, masterless samurai who resorted to brigandage to survive, began wreaking havoc across the country. To avoid the worst, the Hojo further weakened imperial power by creating a second court. The Northern and Southern Courts, from two different branches of the imperial family, were supposed to rule alternately, thus further reducing the emperor’s remaining influence.

    While this solution worked for a few decades, in 1331, Emperor Go-Daigo of the Southern Court ascended the throne, intent on ridding himself of the Hojo regents and the shogunate. The Hojo clashed with forces loyal to the emperor but were defeated by the treachery of the Ashikaga family, led by Takauji, which led to the dispersion and subsequent rout of the shogunate forces. In 1333, Emperor Go-Daigo re-established imperial power for a brief period known as the Kemmu Restoration.

    The Kenmu Restoration (1333–1336)

    Go-Daigo’s main goal—to retake control from the shogunate and effectively rule Kamakura without interference from the military—is now possible thanks to the success of his uprising. However, the Kemmu Restoration was short-lived, primarily due to a strategic error on the emperor’s part. He believed he had the support of a significant portion of the samurai class and the so-called “loyalist” military clans and families. In reality, these loyalist samurai and clans had not engaged in the revolt to support the emperor but rather to end the Hojo domination. Consequently, after the emperor’s restoration as the true leader, Go-Daigo neglected to reward his allies, assuming their allegiance. By failing to compensate the samurai, he lost their support, leading to new disturbances in the country.

    Simultaneously, the majority of the warrior class is discontented with what they perceive as ingratitude, and the major military families are concerned about the emperor’s initiatives to establish a civilian-dominated power. Violent political clashes ensue, particularly between Prince Morinaga, the emperor’s descendant, and Takauji, the leader of the Ashikaga clan, each vying to place their followers in strategic positions. Gradually, Takauji manages to distinguish himself as the leader and representative of the samurai. Eventually, he imprisoned Morinaga on charges of treason in Kamakura in 1335.

    In that year, an unexpected event provided Takauji with the opportunity he needed. A survivor of the Hojo regency, Tokiyuki, revolted and temporarily regained control of Kamakura. Before leaving, the Ashikaga-appointed governor ordered Morinaga’s execution, shifting the blame onto the Hojo. Takauji then asked the emperor to grant him the title of shogun to quell the rebellion. Despite Go-Daigo’s disagreement, Takauji left Kyoto for Kamakura and ended the Hojo revolt. When the emperor ordered him to return, he refused, signaling that Takauji and the Ashikaga were rejecting the emperor’s authority, leading to the secession of the Kamakura region.

    Swiftly, an imperial army assembled to defeat the Ashikaga, while a second army marched towards Kamakura to aid its defense. On November 17, 1335, Takauji’s brother sent messages throughout the country, calling on all samurai to defend the Ashikaga against the emperor’s tyranny. Simultaneously, the imperial court urged the samurai to help defeat the Ashikaga rebels.

    When the actual war began, most samurai were convinced that Takauji Ashikaga was the leader they needed to assert their interests. With a significant numerical advantage, Ashikaga forces defeated the imperial armies, and on February 25, 1336, Takauji entered Kyoto, putting an end to the Kemmu Restoration.

    The Muromachi Period (1337–1573)

    After more than a year of debates and dissensions, Takauji Ashikaga was finally appointed Shogun in 1337. The Ashikaga shoguns maintained their reign for nearly 250 years, until 1573. This period was named Muromachi, after the district where the shoguns’ palace was located. It was relocated back to Kyoto in 1378 by the third Ashikaga shogun. This geographical proximity aimed to exert much tighter control over the imperial court. While the Kamakura shogunate had never truly eradicated imperial power, the Ashikaga went so far as to destroy the notion that the Emperor should reign directly, making the position of Shogun indispensable for the Empire’s proper functioning.

    Under the Kamakura shoguns, the governor’s position was merely that of an agent acting on behalf of the shogun. However, at the beginning of the Muromachi era, it became synonymous with extended powers, gaining almost complete control over the lands they ruled, answering only to the shogun. These lords, called daimyos, quickly became the most powerful political figures in the Empire directly after the shogunal court.

    In 1392, the Ashikaga also reunified the separated Imperial Court under the Hojo regency, another measure to control imperial power more easily. Eventually, it was the rise of the shoguns that led to the decline of the Ashikaga, to the point where the daimyos could directly support certain candidates for imperial succession, facilitating the ascent to the throne of emperors favoring their interests, generally to the detriment of the Shogun. From the fourth Ashikaga shogun onward, the influence of the shoguns slowly declined, along with their prestige.

    Officially, the Ashikaga remained in power until 1573, but long before their fall, signs of their decay became increasingly visible. The Ônin War, between 1467 and 1477, triggered by a dispute over imperial succession, marked the beginning of a previously unknown period of turmoil in Japan. A period of civil war where every family and every clan defended only their own interests plunged the country into chaos.

    This troubled period is known as Sengoku-jidai, the age of warring states.

    1477: Japan is in complete chaos. The Ônin War has just ended, but the troubles do not subside. The Ashikaga dynasty, which has been ruling the country on behalf of the Emperor with the title of Seishi Taishogun since 1337, is losing its grip and proves incapable of ending conflicts that emerge everywhere in the country among the dozens of noble families and clans. Japan gradually lost its cohesion, sinking into one of the most turbulent periods in its history, the Sengoku-jidai (a time of unprecedented upheaval and transformations), the era of warring states.

    Nanban and Gunpowder

    In 1543, a typhoon off the coast of Tanegashima, in southern Japan, kidnapped a ship full of Portuguese sailors and brought them to the Japanese islands. There was a profound shock since the Japanese had never before had any meaningful interaction with European cultures. The Portuguese were referred to as “Nanban” by the Japanese. This term translates to “Southern Barbarians.”

    Despite an embargo placed by the Emperor of China in retribution for Japanese piracy, the Portuguese started importing Chinese commodities, notably silk, into Japan within a few years. Eventually, business picked up speed. The port of Nagasaki opened as a commercial station in 1571, and commerce with the Portuguese increased rapidly. Shortly later, in 1578, the daimyo of the Sumitada clan requested Portuguese aid in fending off an assault on the daimyo, and in return, the port was permanently surrendered to the Jesuits.

    To Japan next came the Dutch in the year 1600. The competition with the Portuguese for control of commerce with the Land of the Rising Sun was severe.

    There were two key shifts that the introduction of Westerners to Japan brought about. One of the causes was technical. Gunpowder’s use in Japanese military operations was nascent in 1543. The intention behind this seemingly minor innovation was to dramatically shift the power dynamic. Suddenly, families armed with Portuguese arquebuses could compete with their more formidable neighbors.

    The availability of such weapons also contributed to the escalation of hostilities. Fighting broke out on the southern island of Kyushu when the Portuguese arrived, and it wasn’t until later that harquebuses became commonplace across the archipelago. They were dubbed Tanegashima after the island where the Nanban had their first encounter. By 1560, harquebuses were widely used in warfare.

    The harquebuses were not the only thing the Westerners brought with them, though; the Christian faith was also a major contributor to tensions. Six years after the first meeting, Nagazaki built its first church. The founder of the Jesuits, the Catholic Church’s missionary arm, set his sights on Japan in an effort to win over the local population. In under 30 years, the majority of the daimyo in Kyushu and more than 130,000 other Japanese were converted.

    Christianity flourished across Japan, from the lowest of the low to the highest of the high, despite the social boundaries that existed between the various classes. While some daimyo were willing to accept Buddhism without investigation, others were suspicious of the new faith, believing it was being utilized by the Nanban to penetrate Japan. Christian and non-Christian daimyos began fighting with one another.

    Gekokujo: The Powerful Are Defeated by the Humble

    The clan wars tearing apart the country witnessed unprecedented events. The ancient, powerful, and respected clans, along with their leaders, who, according to the Japanese social system, are masters of their vassals, are gradually losing ground to dynamic new clans and ambitious leaders. The established order is shattered by internal rivalries, and those who, in times of peace, would have submitted to the will of dominant families now struggle to take the lead. This phenomenon is known as Gekokujo, roughly translated as “the humble overcome the powerful.”

    As a result, the war rapidly degenerates, occurring not only between clans but also within clans. Various families and branches within the clan vie for control. In the Echigo region, north of Kyoto, on the coast of the Sea of Japan, peasants and commoners rise up following the Ikko-ikki religious movement (a Buddhist school of the “Pure Land”) and assert their independence. They receive support from the minor nobility and rōnins, the samurai left masterless by the war.

    In the province of Iga (Skull Valley), villagers free themselves from the grip of feudal lords, establishing a league (ikki) comprised of peasants, rōnins, and the clergy to defend against external aggressors. The region is notably renowned for its ninja clans.

    In summary, this phenomenon, accelerating the decomposition of the country into rival factions, also presents a unique opportunity to end the social stagnation that led to the decline of the Ashikaga dynasty.

    The Unification of Japan: Oda Nobunaga (1534–1582)

    Oda Nobunaga in a 16th-century portrait by Kanō Motohide (detail)
    Oda Nobunaga in a 16th-century portrait by Kanō Motohide (detail).

    During this turbulent period, three ambitious and skilled men emerged to reunify Japan under a single banner. The first among them took the lead of the Oda clan in 1551, a minor clan in the Owari province in central Japan. His name was Oda Nobunaga.

    At that time, the Oda clan was in a precarious situation, being a vassal of Shiba Yoshimune, the governor of the province, and divided into several factions. With the support of Yoshimune and one of his younger brothers, Oda Nobumitsu, Nobunaga managed to overcome the opposition of Nobutomo, another brother who assassinated Yoshimune to deprive Nobunaga of support. Nobunaga eventually got rid of his brother and rival in Kiyosu, then used Yoshimune’s son as a puppet to form an alliance with a powerful neighboring clan, the Imagawa. After eight years of conflict and the elimination of another brother, Oda Nobunaga finally succeeded in unifying the Owari province under his leadership in 1559.

    The following year, he had to defend against an incursion by the Imagawa, who marched with 25,000 men towards Kyoto, while Nobunaga could only muster 3,000. Against all expectations and the advice of his counselors, Nobunaga attacked the Imagawa forces, using straw dummies and the cover of a providential storm to sow chaos among his enemies. This was the Battle of Okehazama, during which the Imagawa general was killed. The Imagawa quickly lost their position, and Nobunaga took the opportunity to ally with one of their former vassals, the Mitsudaira, in 1561.

    Between 1561 and 1567, he focused on seizing the neighboring Mino province, diverting the vassals of the Saito clan from their master before launching a lightning campaign that swept away the Saito in a few months. After this victory, he changed his personal seal to “Tenka Fubu,” meaning: Unify the nation with military might.

    In 1568, at the request of a member of the Ashikaga family, Nobunaga set out to conquer Kyoto, quickly driving the Miyoshi clan out of the city and making Ashikaga Yoshiaki the 15th Ashikaga shogun. Almost immediately, Nobunaga began to restrict the shogun’s powers, thereby increasing his own power and making it clear to the daimyo that he intended to use the shogun as a puppet.

    Later Hōjō era's Odawara Castle.
    Later Hōjō era’s Odawara Castle. Image: Wikimedia.

    This bold move was too much for Nobunaga’s rivals. Led by the Asakura, former masters of the Oda, the Asai, and the Ikko-ikki launched a concerted aggression against the Oda clan, inflicting heavy losses. Eventually, with the help of their allies, the Tokugawa (formerly Mitsudaira), the Oda counterattacked, breaking the Asai and Asakura armies at the Battle of Anegawa. Subsequently, Nobunaga, known at the time for his Christian sympathies, dealt with the Buddhist uprising against him. He burned the Enryaku-ji temple in 1571 and besieged the Nagashima fortress. Eventually, the struggle against the Ikkō-ikki Buddhists cost him several thousand soldiers and two brothers, and he finally set fire to the castle in 1574, ending the resistance.

    Meanwhile, as Nobunaga was entangled on his western flank, the Takeda clan seized the opportunity to attack from the east, starting by invading Tokugawa lands, defeated at the Battle of Mikatagahara in 1573. The Tokugawa managed to slow down the Takeda by organizing night raids, and after the death of Takeda Shingen, the Takeda retreated. At the same time, the Oda completed the conquest of the Asai and Asakura clans.

    In 1574, Nobunaga turned to the east and, with the Tokugawa, invaded the Takeda clan’s lands, reducing the entire Takeda forces to nothingness at the Battle of Nagashino, thanks in part to the innovative use of arquebusiers arranged in a triple line of fire for continuous shooting. The Takeda never recovered from this defeat.

    For three years, Nobunaga consolidated his positions, but the Mori to the west broke the naval blockade of the surviving Buddhist castle at Igashiyama. In 1577, the future Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Nobunaga’s lieutenant, was sent to attack the Mori clan. The Uesugi clan, under the leadership of Uesugi Kenshin, gathered northern clans to attack the Oda that same year, resulting in a crushing defeat at Tedorigawa. Only Kenshin’s death ended the second anti-Oda coalition.

    In 1582, Nobunaga controlled half of Japan, including Kyoto. The conquest of the Mori continued, and the northern clans could no longer offer credible resistance. Nobunaga fell victim to a coup that Mitsuhide, one of his lieutenants, orchestrated while he was traveling to the western front. Mitsuhide’s troops surrounded the Honno-ji temple where he was staying, killing Nobunaga and his eldest son, casting doubt on the succession.

    Toyotomi Hideyoshi (1536/37–1598)

    Toyotomi Hideyoshi
    Toyotomi Hideyoshi..

    After the death of Nobunaga, the situation was chaotic. Hashiba Hideyoshi emerged to quell the rekindled chaos. This former lieutenant of Nobunaga, the son of the ashigaru (peasant class), initially served Nobunaga as a sandal-bearer, a very low-ranking servant.

    At the Battle of Okehazama, Nobunaga noticed him and became interested in his sharp-witted servant. In 1564, Hideyoshi was sent to rally deserters from the Saito clan to the Oda cause. In 1567, the Battle of Inabayama was won thanks to Hideyoshi’s idea to flood the valley where the castle was built. In 1573, Nobunaga made him the daimyo of a fief in North Omi, and Hideyoshi continued to faithfully serve Nobunaga, leading a war against the Mori clan between 1577 and 1582.

    Upon learning of Nobunaga’s death due to Mitsuhide’s betrayal, Hideyoshi immediately negotiated a peace treaty with the Mori and turned his forces against the traitors at the Battle of Yamazaki. After avenging his master, it was time to organize Nobunaga’s succession at the Kiyosu meeting. With his eldest son dead, several candidates vied for succession: Oda Nobutaka, Oda Nobukatsu, and Oda Hidenobu. Hideyoshi chose to support the latter, with the help of two of the three Oda clan advisors. Through two swift victories, he eliminated Shibata Katsuie, Nobutaka’s advocate, and established a status quo with the Tokugawa defending Nobukatsu.

    Once his candidate was installed as the head of the Oda clan, Hideyoshi began strengthening his grip, starting the construction of his own fortress, Osaka Castle, in 1583. During this relatively calm period, he was officially adopted by the regent family of Fujiwara, receiving the title of Kampaku (“regent”) and the name Toyotomi.

    Taking advantage of his dominant position, Hideyoshi launched a conquest of the South, gaining control of Southern Honshu and overthrowing the Chosokabe clan’s dominance on Shikoku. In 1587, he landed in Kyushu and, strongly opposing the spread of Christianity, banned missionaries from the island. To prevent the formation of new leagues (or ikki), he prohibited peasants and commoners from carrying weapons, initiating what was later called the sword hunt. Once his control was established in the South, Hideyoshi turned his attention to the East again, defeating the Hojo clan, the last major independent clan, at the Battle of Odawara. He then offered their Kanto lands to Tokugawa Ieyasu if the latter submitted, which he did. Hideyoshi became the master of a unified Japan.

    Unfortunately, his ambitions did not stop there. Now that the country was under his control, he contemplated invading Ming China, first securing control of Korea (Joseon at the time). When the Korean governors, vassals of the Emperor of China, rejected the proposed free passage agreements, he devised invasion plans starting in August 1591.

    In April 1592, Japanese troops landed on Korean soil, capturing Seoul without significant difficulty and undertaking the takeover of the country’s strategic points, dividing to achieve this goal as quickly as possible before China reacted. In four months, they had begun to force a route to Manchuria by spring 1593. However, a Chinese army counterattacked and pushed the Japanese back to Seoul, where the war bogged down.

    The quagmire of the Korean expedition destabilized Hideyoshi, and the birth of his first son in the same year sparked a succession dispute with his nephew, while the fierce repression of Christianity caused further troubles. A new invasion of Korea launched in 1598 failed miserably, and a plague epidemic ravaged the country, claiming Hideyoshi’s life on September 18, 1598. Once again, Japan was deprived of a leader.

    The Tokugawa Leyasu Period (1543–1616)

    Tokugawa Ieyasu
    Tokugawa Ieyasu.

    Tokugawa Ieyasu, a longstanding ally of the Oda, had taken up arms against Toyotomi Hideyoshi since the latter was not an ally but a competitor. As far back as 1584, when the Tokugawa supported Oda Nobukatsu over Hideyoshi’s candidate in the succession to Nobunaga, the Tokugawa had been at odds with Hideyoshi and his kin. Ieyasu’s son became Hideyoshi’s adopted child when the two leaders settled their differences and established a united government.

    While Hideyoshi consolidated power elsewhere in Japan, he made the Hojo stronghold of Kanto available to the Tokugawa in 1588. Quickly agreeing, Ieyasu saw the chance to extend his empire (from 5 to 8 provinces), while Hideyoshi wanted to undermine his competitor by relocating him to an area he did not control. Ieyasu won over the previous Hojo clan members and started constructing a new domain in Edo while patiently waiting for his opportunity.

    After Hideyoshi appointed him and four other counselors as regents for his son Hideyori, he served in this capacity until Hideyoshi’s death in 1598. After Maeda Toshiie, the most revered of the five regents, was killed, Ieyasu spent a year forging alliances with Hideyoshi’s erstwhile opponents and then marched on Osaka Castle, where Hideyori was hiding.

    Ishida Mitsunari rallied the other three regents to stand against him. It didn’t take long for the western army to become a clan that supported Hideyoshi and the eastern army to establish a clan that supported the Tokugawa clan. During the greatest battle in Japanese history in June of 1600, the Tokugawa clan marched north against the Uesugi clan and then west to counter the army marching to Fushimi, dividing its forces under the command of his son Hidetada. However, this secondary force fell behind along the Tokaido route and was therefore not present.

    Sekigahara battle
    Battle of Sekigahara.

    The Battle of Sekigahara took place on the 21st of October, 1600, and included around 160,000 troops. The battle was intense, but the Tokugawa ultimately broke through the western army’s right flank, resulting in a widespread defeat that allowed them to seize control of Japan and wipe out their competitors simultaneously. On April 24, 1603, after consolidating and solidifying his power, he was made shogun, marking the commencement of the last Japanese shogunate, which would continue for almost 250 years.

    References:

  • Hitler’s use of child soldiers in the Nazi regime

    Hitler’s use of child soldiers in the Nazi regime

    The National Socialists used war games and the militarization of mass groups to shape young minds. The Nazi leadership dispatched many young individuals who had been raised under National Socialism to the front lines, where many of them died. “Not alone did the English drop bombs, but they also dropped ration cards (…). leaflets included, and they’re the unpleasant kind. My faith is unmovable. God will be with us, and our cause will be just if A. Hitler can lead us to victory. I just can’t bring myself to be hateful of the English. They are Germans, too.”

    In spite of the bombing of Berlin and other towns and the bleak news from the Eastern Front, 15-year-old Liselotte’s belief in “Führer, folk, and fatherland” remained unshaken on August 28, 1943. These journal entries were written by a girl, reflecting her thoughts and feelings about the war from 1942 to 1945 through the lens of a child raised in a National Socialist society.

    After the Soviet loss at Stalingrad in February 1943, she wrote the following: “Germany is under severe distress now. Stalingrad. It’s sad enough to make you shed some tears. Still, I refuse to give in to weakness. That’s why we can’t afford to give up and admit defeat. The greatest of our German people have shed their blood at the front, and we dare not dishonor them in this way.” By November, however, the young people’s outlook had brightened once more: “Hitler gave me fresh optimism in triumph, he talked of landing in England and of retribution for the bombing horror.”

    The methods used by the Nazi government to brainwash its young citizens

    Diary entries like Liselotte’s show the extent to which the National Socialists were effective in indoctrinating and molding a generation of youngsters and young adults in accordance with their ideological ideals. A whole generation’s worth of kids grew up learning and believing in National Socialist slogans and concepts like duty and devotion.

    They were raised to believe in Adolf Hitler and their “racial” supremacy. Moreover, as Nicholas Stargardt of Oxford University recounts in his book “Children’s Lives Under the Nazis,” many children were trained to have an inflated sense of responsibility, leading them to sacrifice themselves and others in the war’s last months. On the 8th of November, 1943, Liselotte questioned herself: “Is it not our holy responsibility to continue the fight?

    buy oseltamivir online in the best USA pharmacy https://petspawtx.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/png/oseltamivir.html no prescription with fast delivery drugstore

    If Germany were to be completely destroyed, then our bravery would be on par.
    buy clomiphene online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/clomiphene.html no prescription pharmacy

    Also, if we all die, 1918 will be over. Adolf Hitler, I believe in you and the German victory.”

    The Nazis aimed to instill their ideology in the brains of future generations as early as possible. They employed their youth groups for this purpose. The Hitler Youth (HJ) was the most influential of their youth groups. Its beginnings may be traced back to 1926. Beginning in the spring of 1940, all children ages 10 to 14 were required to join the Jungvolk and pledge loyalty to Adolf Hitler, making membership mandatory for all youths between the ages of 14 and 18 already in 1939.

    The Jungmädelbund (JM) and League of German Girls (Bund Deutscher Mädel, BDM) were formed to represent and advocate for the rights of the girls. Virtually all German children and teenagers between the ages of 10 and 18 were members of the organizations since participation was required by law.

    Additionally, in 1933, all other youth groups were outlawed as well. The idea was that the Nazi state would instill its ideology directly and offer paramilitary training for youngsters via physical exercise, rather than leaving instruction only to schools and homes. Hitler and the Nazi leadership relied on this kind of indoctrination to ensure their continued rule for the foreseeable future.

    Topics like “Germanic Gods and Heroes,” “The People and Their Blood Heritage,” and “Adolf Hitler and His Fellow Fighters” were featured in the HJ units’ curriculum. Children were exposed to the age-appropriate propaganda radio broadcast at structured events including parades, field trips, and family night.

    Children were tasked with gathering herbs from the woods and sorting through trash in the city, where they found items such as clothing, metal, and even bones. Girls knitted socks and mittens for troops at the front, assisted in kindergartens, and served food and coffee at railway stations to passing soldiers, many of whom the girls later corresponded with via letters.

    Inherently prepared to lay down their lives for others

    Some young people were tremendously drawn to the military because of the feeling of community it fostered, the appeal of a sense of duty, the uniforms, and the freedom they were promised once they were distant from their families and schools. Joachim Lörzer, a contemporary witness, recalls feeling quite mature in his HJ outfit at the age of twelve. According to him, in 1944, he was completely ready to give his life for “Führer, folk, and fatherland.”

    Decades later, some kids said they didn’t care about politics because they were too busy hanging out with their pals and having fun. Others remembered the torturous drills that everyone had to do, while others felt a profound sense of idealism. Postwar interviews with former war children revealed widespread feelings of “betrayal” and “abuse” among those who, like Liselotte, had trusted the dictatorship and its promises. National Socialism gave them the false sense of superiority they needed to believe in their own uniqueness before sending them unprepared to their graves.

    Fast-tracked military training

    The militarization of youth was already visible by the time World War II broke out, but it grew more so after the war’s outbreak. Military training centers were established where any 15-year-old could be taught as a mini-soldier within three weeks, and the Hitler Youth’s shooting duties were increased. It wasn’t until 1943 that boys became common flak helpers.

    The conflict shaped the future of Germany’s youth. Repeatedly, soldiers were seen making their way inside classrooms. In schools and other public buildings, students and visitors might see maps depicting the front lines. German kids chanted war poetry as they built model battleships in art class. Nazi propaganda films like “Our Flags Lead Us Forward” (Hitlerjunge Quex), with the revealing caption “A Film of the Sacrificial Spirit of German Youth,” were distributed to children as Christmas gifts. In the movie, a boy who is a firm believer in the HJ is killed by his “communist” companions.

    In the front, the dads helped their kids with their assignments

    Hitler's use of child soldiers in the Nazi regime
    (Credit: The Wiener Holocaust Library Collections)

    Families were profoundly affected by Nazi ideology. The dads were in the thick of battle, but they kept in touch with their kids through field letters. They keep coming back to the same story of struggle in their letters to one another. Some dads encouraged their children in letters by telling them to “hold your own” and “be a strong, courageous German girl.” On the other side, we observe that dads serving overseas penned touching letters to their children, offering handmade gifts or helpful guidance for the future. Some of the letters include schoolwork that had been graded and returned to the parents by the children after being corrected by their dads.

    The National Socialists attempted to inject their philosophy into the domestic sphere, but they were only partially successful. Historians note that there was a limit to the amount of time family conflicts could last. According to ex-BDM women, they never betrayed their own parents. However, there is still case-by-case data that contradicts the overall trend. There was a lot of love and support inside the family, even though everyone was a dedicated Nazi adherent.

    The top Nazis assemble a final posse

    Letters and diaries written by youngsters in the severe tone of Wehrmacht reports demonstrate the extent to which Nazi ideology permeated the world of children. In 1939, a 14-year-old wrote, “The industrial heart of Upper Silesia is almost completely in German hands, and the city of Lodsch has been taken. Führer in Lodsch.” German children became used to their putative leadership position, whereas children in the occupied areas of the East were taught to admire and follow the “Herrenmenschen” (“Master Humans.”)

    A Polish BDM volunteer wrote home to her family, “They are insolent as nothing and gape at us like marvels of the world,” arguing that Polish youngsters should be forced to work. Another BDM girl described how, when she was a little child, her father had told her that the Poles, because of demographic shifts, would swiftly overrun the German Reich if nothing was done. To put it simply, she was terrified of this happening.

    As the battle progressed and the Nazi regime’s ideology hardened, the regime’s true inconsistencies and relentless cruelty became clear. Nazi officials betrayed the same individuals they had praised for years as the “future of the people” by sacrificing them when defeat was certain. Formed in 1944, the Volkssturm enlisted all able-bodied males between the ages of 16 and 60 to fight in the “final victory.” The young people’s sobering experience stood in sharp contrast to their solemn allegiance to the Führer.

    buy antabuse online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/antabuse.html no prescription pharmacy

    Tools, training, and standard-issue garments were all in short supply.

    There were only 40,500 rifles and 2,900 machine guns in the Volkssturm’s main arsenal by the end of January 1945. These weapons were a mishmash of primarily foreign and antiquated models, and ammunition for them was sometimes scarce. The lads were provided ancient, black SS uniforms from the pre-war years (…) and – especially unpleasant for 15-year-olds who wanted to prove what they could accomplish for the Fatherland – French steel helmets.

    A contrast between idealized notions of warriors and the harsh reality they face

    Günter Lucks, a Hamburger, was one of those deployed to the battlefront in Vienna. The 16-year-old had joyfully obeyed his reporting order to the Volkssturm. “I finally felt like an adult, like a real soldier in the making. And I was pleased to be of service to the Fatherland at this most important time.”

    However, instead of excitement and chivalrous warrior romance, disillusionment and dissatisfaction swiftly set in. He told his mother on February 25, 1945, that he was sick of military training at the Reich’s camp at Lázn Luhacovice, Moravia. “You’re correct, I’d rather be in the post office 10 times over.” Following a brief period of training, Lucks led a group of HJ youngsters to the advancing front near Vienna.

    Captain Otto Hafner was perusing a chart when Lucks and his company marched up. Subsequently, Hafner reflected, “They were boys, with babyish complexions and oversized field blouses. Their small fingers hid behind the long sleeves, the narrow faces under the far too enormous helmets. (…) It was a major worry of mine. Should I send these kids into battle against the Russians?”

    When Günter Lucks fired his first shot, he was near Brno, and the experience was “surreal” for him. Unlike many of his companions, he made it through captivity until the conclusion of the war. Nearly 60,000 German boys aged 15 to 17 who were born between 1927 and 1929 lost their lives during the war, most of them as a result of conscription in 1944 and 1945.

    buy zepbound online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/zepbound.html no prescription pharmacy

    There were almost 1.5 million people in all cohorts from 1920 and 1929.

    The brother of Liselotte was also enlisted in the Volkssturm. “Girls should also learn to use the Panzerfaust as Bertel has. They could hold her own against any tank.

    buy cialis professional online in the best USA pharmacy https://petspawtx.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/png/cialis-professional.html no prescription with fast delivery drugstore

    ” In her diary for April 1945, Liselotte made an interesting observation. After waiting a few days, she finally put pen to paper and wrote: “Bertel was sent to the front lines only the day before. It breaks my heart to see boys as young as 15–18 riding out on trucks or bicycles, armed with a carbine, pistol, or bazooka. My heart swells with pride for our boys, who still charge the tanks when they hear the word. However, they are hastily being put to death.”

    Liselotte’s journal shows that she has serious misgivings about the Führer and the government, even at this early stage. The revelation that the Nazis had executed Wehrmacht commanders was a turning point that led to this shift in view. The diary entry of April 12, 1945, says: “To hang a German, a Prussian officer! Curse them, curse the whole Nazi mob, these war criminals and murderers of Jews.” The girl makes one of the very few references to Jews. In their journals and correspondence, many Germans chose to remain quiet about what happened to the Jews.

    It was on May 17, 1945, when Liselotte made her last note in her diary. She’d heard that Bertel and the rest of the HJs had all perished. The teen observed: “So many, many soldiers shirked and chickened out, but Bertel was much too enthusiastic for that. For whom then? For Hitler? For Germany? Poor, hardened youth!” A realization that arrived, sadly, too late.

  • Holodomor: The Soviet-Era Famine That Devastated Ukraine

    Holodomor: The Soviet-Era Famine That Devastated Ukraine

    The term “holodomor” (meaning “killing through famine”) has a morbid ring to it. Millions of Ukrainians died in 1932 and 1933 due to the man-made disaster known as the Holodomor. Those who made it through the ordeal will never forget what happened. Like Maria Katchmar, who, decades later, recalled what it was like to be a youngster in her town when the Holodomor struck:

    “There was absolutely nothing to eat. We ate grass. Mostly, we ate pancakes made of leaves and frostbitten potatoes that our neighbor gave us. (…) Almost everyone died. Most of the time, there was only one man or woman left [from each family]. Almost all the youngsters perished. (…) There was a pit, and there they threw them in, like mud. The pit was big enough for the whole village.”

    16 countries and 22 US states, including Minnesota, have officially designated the Holodomor a genocide.

    Polyvka was a settlement in the Ukrainian region of Cherkassy Oblast where Maria Katchmar spent her childhood. Many people, including Maria Katchmar’s eight siblings, perished from starvation there and in other Ukrainian towns and villages about 90 years ago. Recent research estimates that between 1932 and 1934, around 3.9 million Ukrainians lost their lives. At the time, this amounted to 13.3 percent of Ukraine‘s total population. At the same time, the famine decimated whole villages throughout the Soviet Union, including in Kazakhstan (where the death toll was disproportionately high), the Volga region, the North Caucasus, and other areas.

    Loss of life in southern Russia and the Ukraine between 1929 and 1933. The USSR did not include the white areas at the time.
    Loss of life in southern Russia and the Ukraine between 1929 and 1933. The USSR did not include the white areas at the time. (Credit: Sergento, CC BY-SA 4.0)

    It is now generally accepted that Josef Stalin’s (1878–1953) “revolution from above” was directly responsible for the Holodomor. Causes include Bolshevik industrialization and modernization goals that were enforced harshly, unachievable high levies, and the forced collectivization of farmland.

    The Peasants Compelled to Work on Kolkhozes

    It was official violence and escalation that led to the famine in Ukraine, the breadbasket of Europe. The Bolsheviks, led by Stalin, have been cranking up the persecution of the peasants since 1928. Many peasants were coerced into selling their property and cattle to the government in 1929, when mandatory collectivization of farms (kolkhozes) was instituted. They were subject to food and meat quotas just like every other peasant.

    When people rejected the Soviet government’s oppressive policies, they were labeled “kulaks,” a name from the tsarist period that referred to affluent farmers. That’s why Stalin said in a 1929 directive that they should be “liquidated as a class” since they were enemies of the revolution. And thus the “kulaks” were shunned, jailed, sent to harsh climates, or put to death.

    The Soviet leader Stalin was complicit in the deaths of tens of millions of people.

    Stalin’s plan with the search for the class enemy was to spread his state restructuring out into the countryside and disrupt the established order there. The Bolsheviks did not only see the peasants as a lower-class workforce necessary to feed the city dwellers. Nonetheless, the Bolsheviks were also certain that the rural masses would eventually rise up in rebellion.

    Situations for the Peasants Seemed Grim

    Holodomor, 1933, photograph by Alexander Wienerberger.
    Holodomor, 1933, photograph by Alexander Wienerberger.

    In 1929, peasant Semen Ivanisov lamented the helplessness of his circumstances, writing that he would be labeled an enemy as a “kulak” if he worked hard and enlarged his property. Because otherwise, only the poverty that was sanctioned by ideology would survive. Therefore, the Soviet leadership eliminated all incentives for increasing grain production.

    To go where he wanted to go, Stalin cheaply accepted the annihilation of his own people.

    Official records originally reported an increase in grain yields in 1930 compared to 1929, a year when terrible weather persisted and people suffered from famine. This was despite the haphazard rearrangement of agriculture. The leadership in Moscow, however, was so confident in the success of collectivization that it made a disastrous decision: they increased the levy quotas for both the communal farms and the remaining independent farmers.

    It was already clear that crops would fall well short of estimates by 1931. The Kremlin learned of the communal farms’ inefficient practices, poor yields, and malnourished people. Even though at that time, almost everyone knew that collectivization was to blame for decreased harvests, the program could not be questioned because of its association with Stalin.

    The Communists Did Not Care About Human Life

    Kharkiv, Starved peasants on a street during the Holodomor in 1933.
    Kharkiv, Starved peasants on a street during the Holodomor in 1933.

    It didn’t take long to choose a victim. The failure to meet the quotas was blamed on the “kulaks,” who were subverting the system, and on the inept bureaucrats, who were not cracking down hard enough on the peasants. Moscow boosted quotas for 1932 despite knowing that many were already hungry, as Bolshevik reasoning dictated that this was necessary to offset the peasantry’s supposed anti-Soviet obstructionism.

    In the eyes of the Communists, human life was not all that important. To get what they wanted, they were willing to take the cheap option of mass murder. The goal was to maximize resource extraction from the areas and maintain a steady rate of population growth.

    Stalin’s opinion that nationalism and peasantism were intimately related influenced his decision to escalate the fight against the peasants. In 1925, Stalin said, “The peasant question is the basis, the quintessence of the national question,” adding that a strong national movement would always be supported by a peasant army and that if one wished to halt such a growth, one had to begin with the peasants. For this reason, Stalin saw the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, with its huge rural population, as a special threat. Stalin’s choice may have been influenced by the bloody conflicts that broke out between peasants and Bolshevik forces between 1918 and 1920.

    The absurd targets were attempted to be met by authorities in the spring of 1932 by collecting massive quantities of grain, while being under severe strain. They sent troops to search the towns for supplies. In a letter, a Ukrainian farmer from Sobolivka described the process thusly: “The authorities do the following: they send the so-called brigades, who come to a man or a farmer and search everything so thoroughly that they even pierce the ground and walls with sharp metal tools, into the garden, into the thatched roof, and if they find only half a pound, they take it away on the horse and cart.”

    As of August 1932, stealing even a little quantity of food was punishable by death or 10 years in a work camp in the Soviet Union.

    A Ban Was Placed on the Farmers

    holodomor Starving children at Samara Camp in 1921
    Starving children at Samara Camp in 1921.

    Punishment was similarly harsh for farms that fell short of their targets. Communities as large as farms, ranches, and even towns were singled out and punished monetarily for engaging in commerce. The government took all of the food, equipment, and possessions.

    As a result of widespread famine, Ukrainians attempted to leave for cities and other countries, but the Bolsheviks blocked the borders and briefly halted the sale of railroad tickets. To begin with, towns instituted a passport system to exclude the sick and poor farmers. Fugitive hunters set out on patrol.

    Due to extreme desperation in the spring of 1933, people started eating whatever they could get their hands on, including horses, turtles, cats, rats, frogs, dogs, and ants.

    Stalin’s belief that “Ukrainian nationalism was to blame for the insufficient grain supply, that Ukrainians were therefore purposefully resisting the central power and should be punished once and for all” justified the brutality with which the regime knowingly and willingly drove people to starvation. Stalin wrote to his close friend Lazar Kaganovich on August 11, 1932, saying, “If we do not attempt to repair the situation in Ukraine now, we may lose it.”

    If, as some historians believe, the hunger was not deliberate, the Bolsheviks nonetheless used it to further their own agenda. In a cynical way, the starvation served the purpose of dominance quite well. The people were regimented, opposition was crushed, and it was abundantly apparent who had the power over life and death.

    The Holodomor Was a Time When Many Individuals Prioritized Themselves

    As a result, starvation did not affect everyone equally. Even in the countryside, supply chains were organized in hierarchies, and states were not necessarily the ultimate arbiters of food distribution and rationing. It reminds many of the Soviet Union, when one person was in charge and everyone else just followed orders. However, the complexity of the problem became clear during the Holodomor. Decisions were influenced by the actors’ personal interests at every level. That included anything from favoritism in the allocation of food from communal fields to outright hostility against social outcasts.

    Horses, dogs, cats, rats, ants, turtles, and frogs were all consumed by hungry humans in the spring of 1933. They ate moss, acorns, and tree bark, and fried pancakes made from leaves and grass. Some of the locals cooked the leather off their belts and shoes and ate it. Mykola Latyshko, a contemporary witness, told how every day in the spring of 1933, a hearse would drive through the streets and men would ask, “Did someone die over the night?” at the doors of random homes.

    Another author, Pavlo Makohon, described the situation in his village in the Dnipropetrovsk region at the time: “I ran around collecting everything I could get—porcupines, meat from dead horses—and brought it home to them [the siblings],” he said in a video released by the Ukrainian Interest Group of Canada. “When there was nothing left and everyone had starved to death, I realized that I, too, would die. So I left and started wandering around the ‘khutory’ [homesteads]. Black flags were hanging on the homesteads because everyone had starved to death. In our village, two children were eaten, but the rajon [administrative unit] authorities closed the case.”

    During the Holodomor, People Began to Eat One Another

    Cannibalism incidents soared in the early spring of 1933. The Soviet OGPU recorded many cases of “starving family members killing weaker persons, usually youngsters, and using their flesh for food” in the region of Kharkiv. There were 9 instances of cannibalism in March of 1933, 58 in April, 132 in May, and 221 in June. During the Holodomor between 1932 and 1933, the Ukraine saw at least 2,505 people convicted of cannibalism. Those unfortunate enough to be spotted munching on human flesh were mercilessly thrashed by the mob, and some were even burned to death.

    Ukraine’s social fabric was shattered along with the bodies and minds of its famished citizens by the severity of the crisis. Theft, homicide, and general lawlessness all rose. People in the same community or with the same family did not trust one another. Many individuals, according to those who saw this phenomenon, put their own concerns first and paid little attention to the plight of others.

    Additionally, many people’s social connections were the sole reason they made them. Joining a communal farm and getting aid from family and friends might be the difference between life and death. Being close to the system boosted one’s chances of survival, therefore, very frequently, just one individual in a position of power could rescue a whole family.

    The End of the Holodomor

    The Soviet leader Stalin was complicit in the deaths of tens of millions of people.
    The Soviet leader Stalin was complicit in the deaths of tens of millions of people. (Public Domain)

    The Bolsheviks did not lessen their grip on the peasants until collectivization was officially finished in 1933, by which time there were almost no farmers remaining to bring in a harvest. The Holodomor ended in the autumn of 1933, when deaths began to slow down. The Soviet authorities suppressed information about the famine for a long time.

    The Holodomor has become well known and recognized as an important aspect of Ukrainian history and national identity. Ukrainians usually remember the victims of the Holodomor on the last Saturday of November. The subject of whether or not Stalin actively sought the extermination of the Ukrainian people is a point of contention among experts. Ukrainian historians are in no doubt that Stalin committed genocide, although many Russian scholars emphasize the Soviet context of the famine, noting that not just Ukrainians but members of other ethnic groups inside and outside of Ukraine perished.

    In the West, there is a range of professional views on this topic. The Holodomor famine’s aftereffects were unquestionably genocidal. There were a shocking number of fatalities. The Holodomor became a true genocide in certain areas. It’s always important to consider motive when discussing genocide. Both the legal evaluation and the historical context are important. Germany is only one of several countries that have expressed a desire to officially label the famine Stalin produced as genocide.

    Yet, there is little doubt that Stalin intentionally starved the Ukrainian peasants to death by removing their access to their land and other sources of income, notwithstanding the ongoing debate about the legal evaluation in light of the UN Genocide Convention. Stalin used the Holodomor not only as a means to repress the peasantry, but also to crush forever any hope of independence or even partial independence for the Ukrainian people. Now we know that plan failed.

    • Argentina, Australia, Canada, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Ecuador, Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Moldova, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Ukraine, the Vatican City, and Romania are the countries that have acknowledged Holodomor as genocide.

    Bibliography

    1. Lubomyr Luciuk, Lisa Grekul, 1953. Holodomor: Reflections on the Great Famine of 1932–1933 in Soviet Ukraine. Kashtan Press. ISBN 978-1896354330.
    2. Institute of National Remembrance (2009). Jerzy Bednarek, Serhiy Bohunov, Serhiy Kokin. Holodomor. The Great Famine in Ukraine 1932–1933 (PDF). ISBN 978-83-7629-077-5.
    3. National Museum of the Holodomor. “Website of the National Museum of the Holodomor”.
  • Palace of Versailles: Its Grand History and Detailed Construction

    Palace of Versailles: Its Grand History and Detailed Construction

    An estimated 6.5 million people from all over the globe visit the Palace of Versailles each year because it is a marvel of global heritage and one of the most visited historical sites in the world. As a symbol of the might of the Sun King and the France of the Grand Century, Louis XIV accomplished at Versailles his ideal of stone, gold, greenery, water, and light, combining all the energies of national industry. He may not have realized all the ways in which his choice to construct his castle would affect others. The departure of the government from Paris signaled a newfound freedom and boldness in the city.

    History of Versailles before the Sun King

    In 1038, in a charter of the monastery St. Père de Chartes, the word “Versailles” occurs for the first time. One of the people that signed the document was named Hugo de Versaillis. As the Hundred Years’ War came to a close, the tiny town was in a terrible situation, with dwellings destroyed and abandoned and the castle in ruins. In 1472, a minor settlement by the name of Versailles-aux-bourgs-de-Galie (Versailles in the town of Gally) was documented. After that, in 1475, Gilles de Versailles, lord of Versailles, ceded Trianon to the abbey of Saint Germain. In this context, the name Trianon appears for the first time. Louis XI purchased the little town and razed it in order to make way for his plans to construct a royal estate and resting palace there. It was the First Royal Caprice of Versailles, and the king’s goal was to go away from Paris and have some fun in a more relaxed environment.

    When traveling from Paris to Brittany, Versailles was the first major attraction. On the other hand, the property was mostly marshy and bordered by uncultivated fields. It was a harsh environment with plenty of darkness and wildness. A combination of poor health conditions (a result of the persistent humidity) and widespread disease epidemics led to a rapid decline in the human population, which in turn led to the rapid repopulation of the animal kingdom. Domain sold to Charles IX’s financial secretary, Martial de Loménie, in 1561; he eventually expanded it to 150 hectares. On Saint Bartholomew’s Day in 1572, however, Loménie was allegedly strangled to death by Catherine de’ Medici so that the Count of Retz might inherit the Château de Versailles.

    In the year following, Albert de Gondi, Count of Retz, paid 35,000 livres for the castle and land of Versailles. From this point on, we may assume that the future rulers of Europe had a genuine appreciation for Versailles. From July 7 to 9, 1578, Henry of Navarre resided there; he came back again in 1604 and 1609. Prince Louis, who would grow up to be King Louis XIII, went on his first hunt there in 1607, at the tender age of 6. In 1616, Albert de Gondi bequeathed the seigneury to his son, Jean François.

    A few times later, King Louis XIII and his associates returned to the almost deserted estate after accompanying him on hunting expeditions. Getting sick of his uncomfortable sleeping arrangements, he set out in 1623 to construct a modest brick, stone, and slate home in the midst of the forest, on a hill surrounded by marshes. He came to consider this crude structure as a prime hunting spot. Louis XIII amassed a 40-hectare estate by purchasing the neighboring property.

    The main structure of his little castle was 78 feet (24 m) in length and 20 feet (6 m) in depth, with two modest wings on each side. It was located at the end of the current Marble Courtyard (Cour de Marbre). The central chamber of Louis XIV’s residence was the king’s bedroom, which was surrounded by four rooms with tapestry walls. When the monarch finally got to spend his first night at Versailles with his subjects in March 1624, he was overjoyed. This was his safe haven, where he could just be himself.

    The architect, Philippe Leroy, would construct a 108-by-46-foot (33-by-14-m) rectangular structure with 4.30-foot-thick (1.30 m) side walls, three galleries advertising the presence of a game inside, and an ashlar tile floor. During excavations in the Grand Commun’s courtyard, a crew from the Inrap uncovered these components, as well as the residence of the paumier (the room’s caretaker).

    When Louis XIII was a young man, in April 1632, he purchased the Versailles estate from Jean François de Gondi, the uncle of Cardinal de Retz.

    It was stated that “a miller governed where Louis XIV ruled,” referring to the legend that a windmill formerly stood at the summit of the Versailles plateau, where the modern château now stands.

    The monarch purchased the castle with the intent of razing it to the ground in order to expand the grounds around the royal palace. He added to his hunting grounds by purchasing more property. Once it became clear that the initial pavilion would not be large enough, construction under Philibert Le Roy started in May 1631 and was finally finished in 1634. After moving into his new digs, Louis XIII settled down. From 1636 on, the king often visited, taking pleasure in his new home and the surrounding gardens, which were designed in the French style and ornamented with arabesques and intricate interlacing.

    West of the castle, the earliest signs of the gardens date from the 1630s. A tiny round basin was surrounded by a parterre of compartmented boxwood needlework. The crew began planning the Bassin d’Apollon (The Apollon Pond) in 1639, when they laid out a main road from the castle terrace westward into the valley’s depression. The gentle slope of the ground was followed in this delightful garden. The primary axes, which made up the basic lines of the gardens, remained mostly unchanged until the renovations authorized by Louis XIV.

    In 1643, Louis XIII made the following declaration: “If God gives me back my health, as soon as my dauphin is old enough to ride a horse and of age, I will put him in my place, and I will retire to Versailles with four of our fathers to talk about divine things.” The end of the world, he thought, was drawing near. It was on May 14 when he finally passed away. After almost eighteen years, the royal family no longer called Versailles home.

    The Palace of Versailles in the 17th century

    Versailles in 1668, painted by Pierre Patel.
    Versailles in 1668, painted by Pierre Patel.

    Louis XIV became wary of Paris following the events of the Fronde and wished to retire elsewhere. So he set off in search of a large area in which to construct his fortress. In 1651, he paid Versailles his first visit and immediately became enamored with the palace. Louis XIV’s visit to the unfinished Château de Vaux-le-Vicomte (Palace of Vaux-le-Vicomte) in 1659 inspired him to create a château unlike any other in his kingdom or even Europe, one that would forever stand as a monument to his majesty and the magnificence of his reign.

    The layout of the castle was meticulously crafted to draw attention to the monarch: the king’s private quarters were situated in the palace’s geometrical center, on a grand axis that ran from the king’s statue in the entry courtyard to the palace’s Green Carpet and Grand Canal. First visited by Louise de La Vallière, the king’s mistress at the time, this fortress was built for one purpose: to keep his affairs private. The “Château de Carte” would become the “Garçonnière Royale.”

    It was not until 1660 that Louis XIV took his new wife, Queen Maria Theresa (Maria Theresa of Spain), there. From 1661 on, the expansion of Versailles started. The king dropped almost 1,010,000 livres between 1661 and 1662. He chose to create, in place of the hunting lodge of his father, one of the most spectacular palaces in Europe, which sparked criticism from the courtiers.

    It was founded on a site that was both unforgiving and inaccessible, with terrain that was both sandy and swampy. The Trianon mansion had to be torn down, and the surrounding area had to be drained and leveled. As the saintly bishop Simon of Cyrene once put it, “Versailles is an ungrateful place, sad, without view, without wood, without water, without land, because everything is shifting sand and swamp, without air, therefore not good.”

    The construction of the Palace of Versailles

    Le Vau's garden façade around 1675
    Le Vau’s garden façade around 1675.

    Louis XIV had the most talented architects, designers, gardeners, and fountain makers he could find recruited to make over the structures. Louis Le Vau oversaw the reconstruction of the Communs, while Charles Errard and Noël Coypel started the opulent interior design of the apartments by incorporating a motif based on the sun, a fixture throughout the Palace of Versailles. The Orangery and the Menagerie were both designed by Le Nôtre. Size-wise, the gardens expanded, and statues by Girardon and Le Hongre were added for flair. In those days, the Palace of Versailles served only as a place for social gatherings and leisure activities like garden parties.

    Louis wanted his friends and family to have a good time at his home, which he took great pride in. A unique feature of his visitors’ flats was that they were fully furnished. For the first time in the history of royal households, Colbert boasted, “His Majesty has everyone fed, and has wood and lights in all the rooms.” Recalling Colbert’s famous letter, we read, “During the time that Your Majesty had spent such large amounts on this residence, she had ignored the Louvre, which was unquestionably the most splendid palace in the world.” It’s unfortunate that the greatest monarch was judged by the standards of Versailles.

    The first celebrations were conducted in the castle in May 1664, and they were called “The Pleasures of the Enchanted Isle.” Mademoiselle de La Vallière was the intended guest, and they were presented to her in secret and lasted for 8 days. Louis XIV then had Versailles prepared for his use between 1664 and 1666 so that he could spend an extended period of time with his Council. He preserved Louis XIII’s old chateau. The size of the castle was increased by a factor of three by Le Vau. The first Orangery and the Menagerie were both constructed in 1665, but unlike them, the grotto of Thetis had not withered away. The Grand Canal wasn’t started until two years later. Le Nôtre was responsible for the landscaping, outdoor furniture, and layout of the expanded central alley. He enlisted the help of the sons of Italian engineers who were fluent in hydraulic systems—the Francines.

    The second show in July 1668 would be the “Grand Divertissement Royal de Versailles.” Many of the courtiers couldn’t find a place to sleep because of the commotion caused by the festivities, and the modest castle became more unpopular. Le Vau then proposed two options for expanding the castle, one of which involved demolishing the original structure, and the other, which was built between 1668 and 1670, involved expanding the castle on the garden side with a stone envelope, which was in reality a second building enclosing the first. On each side of the original castle were two royal residences: the Grand Appartement du Roi to the north and the Queen’s to the south. A huge patio overlooking the greenery was built in the space between them. Rance marble columns, gilded wrought iron balconies, and marble busts adorned the façade. Marble slabs served as the floor of the courtyard. After being elevated, the Commons now included a peristyle of columns topped by sculptures and a succession of pavilions that led to the Louis XIII castle. A solid gold gate guarded the entrance to the Royal Court. A threefold increase in the domain’s surface area.

    From Colbert’s report: “We have 566 men who labor here, and the costs of masonry were as follows: 335,000 livres in 1669, 586,000 in 1670, and 428,500 in 1671, the year the major construction was finished.” François d’Orbay picked up where Le Vau left off when he passed away in October 1670. In the city, Louis XIV was able to save his father’s fortress, but in the gardens, it was destroyed or obscured by construction. From that point on, the residence of Louis XIII was known as the “Old Castle,” while that of Louis XIV was known as the “New Castle.”

    All stone, with long facades broken by outriggers, and a sizable terrace built between the two royal rooms, the Château Neuf was of Italian design. A great entryway, such as the Grand Degré du roi or Escalier des Ambassadeurs, was required to enter the opulent residence. The most luxurious castle entryway ever built required 6 years and a large budget. During the reign of Louis XV (1752–1783), this stairwell was demolished after having been in operation for barely 70 years.

    Despite the basic Italian design, the French spirit was dominated by the existence of arched windows on the first floor, the presence of Ionic columns, niches, and high rectangular windows (arched by Mansart in 1669), the placement of statues in the niches, and the appearance of bas-relief above the windows. The second floor had a Corinthian style of decoration and was topped by a balustrade where trophies rested.

    It was in 1670 that construction began on the Trianon de Porcelaine. At the same time, courtiers started constructing mansions in the area around the castle; in only two years, 14 massive hotels sprang up in Versailles (including the hotels of Luxembourg, Noailles, Guise, Bouillon, and Gesvres). Louis XIV finally completed the palace he had always envisioned as the symbol of his reign. The monarch wanted all of the ministers and their functions centralized. Intent on making Versailles his permanent home, he made plans to do so. Mansart was pressed into service to elaborate on plans for the construction of the Court. To many, the palace of Versailles represented centralized power and control.

    Galerie des Glaces (Hall of Mirrors) in the Palace of Versailles, Versailles, France.
    Galerie des Glaces (Hall of Mirrors) in the Palace of Versailles, Versailles, France.

    The Hall of Mirrors was built between 1678 and 1684 on what had been the new castle’s terrace. The lengthy galleries that served as passageways and connections between rooms were much liked by Louis XIV, who had them built at the Tuileries, the Louvre, and Fontainebleau. Le Brun was tapped to do the ornamentation. The Gallery, which measured 240 feet (73 m) in length and was bounded to the north by the Salon de la Guerre and to the south by the Salon de la Paix, would have far-reaching consequences, including the relocation of the king’s apartment to the Château Vieux, the transformation of the Appartement du Soleil into the Grand Appartement, and the hosting of receptions.

    Building on the south wing, which was to accommodate the nobility, began in 1678. Work started on the pièce d’eau des Suisses and the Bassin de Neptune in the Cabinet des Bains, as well as the earthworks for the Parterre du Midi and the new Orangerie.

    The terrace and the royal couple’s cabinets were afterwards replaced in 1679 by the Gallery of Glazed Cabinets (Galerie des Glaces), the Salon of War (Salon de la Guerre), and the Salon of Peace (Salon de la Paix). Floors topped the central structure on the side facing the marble court. To keep time, a clock was installed. To mirror the elegance of the Ambassadors’ staircase, a second staircase fit for a queen was erected. The only things that remained were the bust of Louis XIV and the two doors leading into the Grand Appartement. As soon as the wings for the Ministers were finished, work started on the Grandes and Petites Ecuries.

    The Grand Apartments’ interior design was finished in 1681. Water from the Seine was pumped by the Machine de Marly. The French Gardens, embellished with marble and bronze sculptures, came to be after the excavation of the Grand Canal and the Swiss Waterworks, which allowed for the addition of more trees and fountains to the gardens.

    Louis XIV moves to Versailles

    Saint Cloud was no longer suitable as Louis XIV’s palace; therefore, on May 6, 1682, he uprooted his family and made the journey to Versailles. An eyewitness described the setup as follows: “On the sixth of May, the King left Saint Cloud to come and settle in Versailles, where he had wanted to be for a long time, even though it was full of masons, with the intention of staying there until after the birth of Madame La Dauphine, who was obliged to change apartments on the second day she arrived because the noise prevented her from sleeping. During construction, the King relocated to a new residence. Scaffolding littered the Hall of Mirrors, making it necessary to traverse the space by means of planks of wood. In terms of age, Louis XIV was 44. He broke with the itinerant tradition of the kings of France who went from castle to castle.

    Salons and cabinets housing the king’s treasures and collections were built by architects in a private residence in 1683. The walls of the Cabinet aux Tableaux, Cabinet aux Coquilles, and Cabinet des Médailles (all illuminated by rock crystal chandeliers) were covered with paintings from the royal collections and other opulent oddities. These “curiosities” included, but were not limited to, vases lined with gold and diamonds, antique busts and figures, a large gold nave lined with diamonds and rubies, porcelain from China and Japan, vases of agate, emerald, turquoise, jade, jasper, and star stone, a large number of vases of pearl conch, statues of ancient animals, and a large jasper vase that was used at the baptism of Charles V.

    In 1684, the Collectors’ apartment was expanded by including the Montespans’ previous flat, and the new space was turned into a small gallery with a ceiling painted by Mignard on the subject of Apollo and Minerva, a floor of valuable wood parquet, and walls covered in luxurious textiles. Louis XIV displayed the crown jewels of his art collection here, including the Mona Lisa.

    The construction of the annex buildings

    The Orangery, which stood in place of Le Vau’s and supplied annual supplies of 3,000 shrubs and 150,000 plants, the stables, the Grand Commun, and the north wing of the courtiers were all built between 1685 and 1689. The Hall of Mirrors was finished by Le Brun in 1686. To replace the porcelain Trianon, Louis XIV had a modest castle of marble and porphyry with gardens constructed there in 1687; this building is now known as the Grand Trianon.

    Both the north and south wings were built as the façade progressed. The Princes, the Court, the Stables, the Carriages, the General Services, and the Servants all found their new homes in these two structures. At that time, the length of the façade was 2,200 feet (670 m).

    Construction of the Saint Louis-dedicated Royal Chapel started in 1689, was halted by the war, resumed in 1699 under the direction of architect Peter Paul Mansart, and was finally finished in 1710. There were two stories in the building, the upper one allocated for the King and the lower one for the Court, in keeping with the palatine style. From the highest point of the tribune, the King observed the mass, while his courtiers, their backs to the altar and their faces turned upward, surveyed their ruler. The architecture had a Corinthian column design. The Italian influence Bernin brought to architecture would be lost. The King’s Apartments were unadorned by the beauty of multicolored marble. The middle of the nave was decorated with a pattern of the royal arms, and a crowned image of King “L” was hugged in front of the altar steps. The painted imagery on the vault contrasted the Old and New Testaments. The organ was placed above the altar.

    The original grotto of Thetis, constructed in 1665 and destroyed in 1685, stood in what was now the chapel’s top vestibule. The white stone, Corinthian capitals atop the columns and pilasters, stucco medallions depicting the four corners of the globe on the ceiling, and arcades topped with sculpted statues of the Virtues above the doors and windows are all carried over from the Chapel’s design. This corridor connected the Great Apartments to the Chapel and provided access from the North Wing apartments to the theater.

    The interior fittings

    In 1689, the Queen’s apartments could be reached by the Queen’s stairway, which led to the Salon de la Paix via the Antechamber, the Grand Cabinet, and the Chamber. This enfilade faced the south side of Le Vau’s enclosure. The courtyard of Marbre was the center of the new royal quarters. There were seven individual rooms in all. The future bedroom of Louis XIV, the salon du Roi, was set up in the castle’s center, and the suite was finished with the cabinet du Conseil and the cabinet des Termes or des Perruques. During this time, there were between 22,000 and 36,000 people working on the different construction sites, along with 6,000 horses.

    The Bâtiments’ supervisor, Louvois, exerted extreme pressure on contractors, laborers, and artists, threatening anyone who wasn’t fully committed with jail time. People were becoming hurt, disabled, and even killed as a result of the accidents that occurred due to the dangerous working circumstances. The following benefits were offered as compensation: Widows get 60–100 livres; 30–40 livres for a shattered limb and 60 livres for a punctured eye.

    The construction site was often disrupted by strike movements (sometimes known as seditions). To discourage such behavior, Louvois laid out the compensation structure for the stonemasons: “for each toe of stone of Saint Cloud, 6.5 feet (2 m) high, polished, it returned to them 50 sols; for those from 20 to 21 inches (50 to 53 cm), 45 sols.” About the same time, a whole forest was planted. Jules Hardouin-Mansart, the architect and site manager, oversaw the entire construction of this impressive structure. In those days, the bill came to almost 80 million livres.

    Originally a small town, Versailles was expanded into a proper metropolis around its namesake castle. Hotels were established by the castle’s nobility for their staff, and the town’s bars were a hub of activity. On the eve of the revolution, there were as many as 70,000 people living in Versailles.

    The king’s chambers were relocated to the heart of the castle in 1701. The “Salon de l’il-de-boeuf” was a hybrid of the 1689 room and the antechamber of the Bassan family.

    Saint Simon made the following remark: “We will not finish on the monstrous defects of a palace so enormous and so enormously expensive, with its accompaniments, which were even more so: an orangery, vegetable gardens, kennels, large and small stables, prodigious outbuildings, and finally a whole city.” Even yet, Louis XIV’s Versailles, a masterpiece in ruin and terrible taste, could not be finished.

    The gardens of Versailles

    After the scandal at Fouquet in 1662, Louis XIV turned his attention to Versailles. He enlisted Le Vau, Le Brun, and Le Nôtre, the architects and landscapers responsible for Vaux le Vicomte, to design and build an elaborate addition to the Palace of Versailles. At this point in time, the gardens were considered a part of the castle’s overall growth. The number of groves and parterres was increased, and brand-new ones were laid down. The Orangery and the Grotto of Thetis were also constructed around this period. Le Vau’s masterwork is the Orangery, which he built to the south of the castle to make use of the natural slope of the hill. For the winter, orange trees were kept in this area. The orange trees and bushes at Vaux le Vicomte were the first to be taken.

    The grotto of Thetis, located to the north of the castle, served as a symbolic portion of the grounds that connected the Sun King to the solar metaphor. Dedicated to the mythical figure of Apollo, the grotto was finally finished in the year 1670. There were sculptures of the sun deity being cared for by Nereids, and there were shell decorations around the room. The pond of Clagny was pumped to a reservoir above the grotto, where it was stored until it was needed to irrigate the gardens and power the fountains that make up the musical gardens.

    The gardens were formally opened in 1664 in honor of Anne of Austria and Maria Theresa of Austria, but were dedicated to Louise de La Vallière. The occasion was known as the “Fête Galante,” or delights of the Enchanted Island. From 1665 to 1668, the gardens had a renaissance, marked by the construction of fountains and the planting of additional trees, as well as the incorporation of symbolic elements inspired by the sun and Apollo. First topographical networks were developed when the Latone and Apollo basins were finished. The Labyrinth, located to the south of the Latone parterre and close to the Orangery, was a simple network of paths designed by Le Nôtre, and the Latone basin, located on the east-west axis, represented an episode from Ovid’s Metamorphoses in reference to the revolutions of the Fronde that Louis XIV kept in mind.

    The Bassin d’Apollon was built on what was formerly the site of the Bassin des Cygnes during the reign of Louis XIII and occupies the same general axis. It was the gardens’ main point and the passageway to the Grand Canal. The east-west axis is stretched by this Grand Canal, which was constructed between 1668 and 1671 and is 4,920 feet (1,500 m) in length, 203 feet (62 m) in breadth, and 23 hectares in area. For amusement purposes during the Ancien Régime (also known as the Old Regime), it was employed on boats.

    A Little Venice was installed to house the caravels and yachts received from the Netherlands, the gondolas received by the Doge of Venice. Flowing from the gardens’ fountains upstream, the water eventually made its way into the Grand Canal. With the use of windmills and horse mills, this water was recirculated to the reservoir built above the grotto of Thetis, where it was used to replenish the water in the fountains. This setup was a closed-circuit system.

    Exotic flowers such as Spanish jasmine and Turkish hyacinths and narcissus were brought in. It was imperative that only the most fragrant flowers be used.

    During the years 1672–1677, the Labyrinth was renovated so that it could be used to teach Louis XIV’s son, the Dauphin, to read and write. Specifically, new fountains depicting Aesop’s tales were erected, and plaques were carved. The completed Labyrinth had 39 fountains and 333 lead animal statues.

    The Parterre d’Eau, a castle terrace located over the Latona fountain, brought together the architectural and landscape design symbols from the expansive living quarters below.

    Each of the 24 statues in the Parterre d’eaux musicales represented either one of the 4 elements (earth, air, water, and fire), one of the 4 seasons (spring, summer, fall, and winter), one of the four continents (Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas), one of the four types of poetry (pastoral, satyric, heroic, and lyric), one of the 4 times of day (morning, afternoon, evening, and night), and the 4 abductions: Boreas kidnapping Orithye, Saturn kidnapping Cybele, Pluto kidnapping Proserpine, Neptune kidnapping Coronis.

    The Bassin des Sapins, located to the north of the château, was laid out on a north-south axis in 1676, and the Pièce d’Eau des Suisses, located in a marshy area to the south of the château, was finished in 1678. It covered an area of 15 hectares and was the second-largest canal in Europe after the Grand Canal.

    The groves

    Le Nôtre expanded the gardens by adding or enlarging 10 bosquets, including the bosquet du Marais in 1670, a rectangular basin with metal reeds around the perimeter, swans at the corners, and an iron tree in the middle; 1671: Water Theatre Grove (Bosquet du Théâtre d’Eau), Ile du Roi, Miroir d’Eau, Three Fountains Grove (Bosquet des Trois Fontaines); 1672: The bosquet de l’Arc de Triomphe was renovated in 1676 with a décor evoking military achievements. The year 1675 saw the creation of many notable trees: the bosquet de la Renommée or des Dômes, the bosquet de l’Encelade (a Titan doomed to a life of servitude beneath Etna), and the bosquet of 1678: the bosquet des Sources; 1680: new bosquet: the Gallery of the Antiques, an open-air gallery with antique sculptures; 20 statues on pedestals, each divided by three water jets; The Ballroom was constructed in 1681 and 1683 in a secluded area of the gardens, complete with a waterfall; and finally, in 1684 and 1685, the Colonnade was constructed on the site of the former Bosquet des Sources, featuring a peristyle of 32 arches and 28 fountains, as well as the current statue of Proserpine.

    When it came to the groves, Louis XIV also requested certain changes. Since 1680, the green space between the Latone and Apollo basins has been known as Tapis Vert. The Parterre d’Eau was remodeled in 1684 to include bronze sculptures of the rivers of France. Between 1685 and 1686, the Parterre du Nord (North Parterre) was redesigned, and new and larger reservoirs were installed to the north of the Aile des Nobles; between 1704 and 1709, copses were redesigned and renamed, suggesting the austerity that marked the last years of Louis XIV’s reign, such as the copses of the Marai.

    History of the Palace of Versailles after the death of Louis XIV

    On September 9, 1715, after Louis XIV’s death, the new king’s guardian, Philippe d’Orléans, moved out of Versailles and into the Palais Royal. The young monarch at the time was just three years old. The Duke of Noailles advocated demolishing the fortress during this reign. However, he was unable to get enough traction because of his lack of backing.

    Peter the Great, Tsar of Russia, stayed in the Grand Trianon during his 1717 visit to Versailles.

    In 1722, at the age of 22, Louis XV returned to Versailles and took up residence in his grandfather’s former chambers. While Louis XIV was preoccupied with historical traditions, the castle never again achieved its former glory. Louis XV did not like Versailles very much, so while he was there, he retreated to the Petits Appartements, the Trianon, Marly, Compiègne, or Fontainebleau.

    In spite of this, he did make some changes, including demolishing the Baths’ apartment and the Ambassadors’ staircase, building the lounge of Hercules, the opera, and the Small Trianon, and remodeling the royal family’s quarters to make them more in keeping with contemporary tastes and more comfortable (all of which were Gabriel’s creations). He also decorated the Hercules lounge, which was a large room with walls covered in marbles selected by the king. There was a connection between the King’s quarters and the chapel’s anteroom via the Salon d’Hercule.

    The Queen’s Chamber had a makeover beginning in 1729, with the project being finished in 1735. From 1729 until 1736, the Salon d’Hercule was under construction. It had been built atop what had been a chapel. The Apotheosis of Hercules was shown on the ceiling, and a massive painting by Veronese was presented to Louis XIV in 1664 for display on the rear wall. In 1739, during a gala honoring Louis XV’s oldest daughter, the monarch officially entered office. Both the wedding of the Duke of Chartres in 1769 and the birth of the Dauphin in 1782 were celebrated in this salon.

    From 1738 to 1760, the apartment of the Collectors of Louis XIV was constantly redesigned. Then, in 1741, work was finally finished on the Bassin de Neptune. When Louis XV took power in 1750, he instituted a new kind of chamber: the dining room of the hunting lodges. That same year, he also had botanical gardens constructed and kept up in the area that is now known as the Queen’s Hamlet.

    The King of England had the Ambassadors’ Staircase, the Small Gallery, and the Medals Cabinet destroyed in 1752. It was necessary to demolish these two “witnesses” to Louis XIV in order to make way for the room of the French monarch’s oldest daughter, Madame Adélade. Second renovations to the structure were started in 1755 by Louis XV, who merged the Cabinet du Roi (later renamed Cabinet du Conseil) and Cabinet des Thermes (later renamed Cabinet des Perruques) to create the Grand Salon du Conseil. The inner cabinets of the monarch were created on the upper level. There was no gilding on the woodwork in this area of the castle. The sculptures were given life by the use of vibrant and contrasting hues. A modest gallery that looked out into the marble court was the apartment’s defining feature.

    Beginning in 1758 and continuing until 1770, the Royal Opera House was constructed at the end of the North Wing of the castle. Since Madame de Pompadour was a performer with a touring company, the initial theater rapidly became inadequate. The Royal Opera was inaugurated at the wedding of her grandson with the archduchess Marie Antoinette in May 1770.

    As the princesses moved from the South Wing to the North Wing on the first floor of the Central Body over the years, Gabriel had to perform multiple tasks to make room for them all, including tearing down the Bathing Apartment, the Staircase of the Ambassadors, and the partitioning of the Lower Gallery. Some of the woodwork from these rooms, which Louis Philippe demolished, is a testament to the period’s lavishness.

    As was customary during Louis XIV’s reign, the dauphin and his wife moved into one of the two rooms on the ground level (beneath the Queen’s apartment) and into the Hall of Mirrors. All of the palace was destroyed in the 1800s, except for the library and the room for the dauphin.

    Gabriel worked on the Petit Trianon from 1761 to 1769, and in the same year that Princess Adelaide relocated, his apartment was linked with hers to create the King’s Room.

    Gabriel’s “Grand Projet,” the rebuilding of the city-facing façade, got underway in 1772. The project was abandoned, with just the Louis XV Wing constructed. The “Grand Degré” inside was finished in 1785.

    The palace was the most extravagant royal house in Europe towards the end of the Ancien Régime.

    Under Louis XVI, the quality of living at Versailles steadily deteriorated, and the royal family and courtiers began to leave. Spending money on the castle was a bad idea. Due to the severe absence of conveniences like restrooms and heating, a complete refurbishment of the structures became necessary. Until the Revolution, work on the project had to be put on hold. Marie Antoinette’s involvement in the Petit Trianon’s construction led to substantial additional costs. Except for the Assumption on August 15 (when all the courtiers were required to be there), the major feasts at Versailles ceased. It was during this event in 1785 that King Louis XVI had the Cardinal of Rohan imprisoned for his involvement in the scandal surrounding the Queen’s Necklace.

    Louis XVI, influenced by the Philosophers, had the gardens fully rebuilt in 1774 and 1775, transforming Le Nôtre’s French gardens into English-style gardens by removing trees and plants from the time of Louis XIV. However, the estate’s topography did not work in favor of the English-style gardens, since these gardens had unusual forms. Therefore, the gardens were redone in a French fashion. Louis XVI ordered that the palisades that had lined the fortifications be taken down and replaced with either lime or chestnut trees. He ordered the construction of the rock-cut grotto known as the Baths of Apollo.

    Louis XVI had the Labyrinth of Louis XIV destroyed in 1778. An arboretum filled with rare plants now stands there. This section of the garden is where the Queen’s Necklace incident occurred, which put Marie Antoinette in danger.

    Louis XVI had a special chamber, the Library, constructed and furnished for him upon becoming king. In 1777, Gabriel was entrusted with the decorating, Rousseau with the sculptures, and two globes, one of the earth and one of the heavens, finished off the room. After consulting with the Baron de Breteuil and the Garde des Sceaux Miromesnil, Louis XVI made the decision to place the Grand Chaplain under arrest while at this library. Before its restoration in 1783, the Cabinet doré served as a storage space for Louis XIV’s possessions, a showcase for Louis XV’s gold dinnerware, and a music chamber for Madame Adélade. Once again, Louis XVI displayed his treasures in this cabinet, and the name was changed to the Cabinet des Papillons.

    The Estates General of 1789 were assembled at Versailles; therefore, the palace saw both the zenith and the nadir of the Bourbon dynasty.

    Versailles in the tumult of the Revolution

    When the Parisian populace, led by women, marched on Versailles in October 1789, the castle’s gates were locked, and a shootout ensued until the populace broke through and returned the royal family to Paris. A return to the castle’s former glory was impossible. At its peak in 1791, the population of Versailles was 51,000. By 1791, it had dropped to 39,000. The furniture in the castle was moved using furniture guards. The Ministry of the Navy now had Louis XV’s splendid desk.

    Versailles was “de-royalized” in 1791 when artwork like paintings, mirrors, and royal insignia were taken from the walls and brought to the Louvre, which by 1792 had become the Central Museum of Arts. Versailles’ public library received the books and medals.

    Later, in 1792, the Convention ordered the clearing of the Grand Parc and the sale of its acreage. The Botanical Gardens’ director pleaded with the new administration to spare the gardens. He was ultimately successful, but only on the condition that the beds be used for vegetable gardens and the orchards become community gathering places. The gardens were made accessible to the public, but the proposed washing facilities never materialized, so visitors instead found themselves doing laundry in the fountains and drying it on the bushes. The royal residence was converted into a cultural mecca, with the Natural History Museum taking up residence in the former Mesdames’ apartment on the first floor of the north wing, the Ecole Centrale de Seine et Oise moving into the former Ministers’ wing, the Salon d’Hercule becoming a school of life models for the future School of Fine Arts, and the Opera House becoming a music conservatory.

    In 1793, the Convention sold at auction the furniture of the castle: 17,180 lots spread over the years 1793 to 1796, the most beautiful pieces went to England, furnishing Buckingham Palace or Windsor Castle.

    Napoleon considered making the castle his imperial residence for some time. He was fond of the adage “What is huge is beautiful,” yet he found Versailles to be too little and unsettling. The architect Fontaine was present when he made the following declaration to him one day: “Why the Revolution which destroyed so much, did not demolish the Palace of Versailles! I would not have today a wrong of Louis XIV on the arms, an old badly made castle, a favorite without merit to make bearable.” To save money, he avoided treating Versailles like an Imperial Palace and instead just repaired the damage that was visible. He liked Trianon, so in 1805 he conducted some renovations and furnished it. However, he continued to clear the bosquet around the Arc de Triomphe and the Trois-Fontaines of their trees. It was required to transplant trees after the erosion destroyed the originals.

    The Royal Palaces of Versailles and Trianon were governed by Philippe Antoine de Noailles, Prince de Poix, beginning in 1815.

    Louis XVIII considered putting money back into Versailles. When he weighed the cost and the ethics involved (returning the royal family to Versailles would be seen as a provocation), he decided to scrap the plan. King Louis XVIII of France “made his passage” in 1817 when he had the King’s Island and the Water Mirror’s groves combined to create the Jardin du Roi.

    Versailles since the 19th century

    Louis Philippe I, King of the France, was the only one who could preserve Versailles from certain destruction and any other potential dangers. He made the decision to give it to the French. In 1833, he issued a proclamation directing his minister, the Count of Montalivet, to turn the castle into a museum. From the time of Clovis to that of the Ancien Régime, from the French Revolution to the Empire and the Restoration, the museum would honor the triumphs of military might.

    More than 23 million Francs were spent from the king’s own pocket to complete the restoration. And for his own use, he had the Grand Trianon renovated. Located in the South Wing, the 393-foot-long (120 m) and 42-foot-wide (13 m) Gallery of Battles was custom-built for Louis Philippe and has 32 paintings honoring famous military victories, ranging from the Battle of Tolbiac to the Battle of Wagram.

    Museum opening ceremonies took place in June 1837, with the institution being dedicated at the time to “all the grandeur of France.” With almost 6,000 paintings and 3,000 sculptures, it would serve as the primary resource for studying French history. The French king had a political agenda established that aimed to unite the country. References to the past were often used to stress this point.

    In the Hall of Mirrors and the salons of the enormous apartments, a meal for 1,500 guests was put up for the inauguration, after which the Misanthrope was performed and guests were delighted with a promenade with torches until 2:00 in the morning.

    Let us quote the words of Victor Hugo on this occasion: “What King Louis Philippe did at Versailles is good. To have accomplished this work is to have been great as a king and impartial as a philosopher, it is to have made a national monument out of a monarchical monument, it is to have put an immense idea in an immense building, it is to have installed the present in the past, 1789 vis – vis 1688, the emperor in the king’s house, Napoleon in Louis XIV’s house, in a word it is to have given to this magnificent book that is called the history of France this magnificent binding that is called Versailles.”

    A lot of the ancient trees that had stood since Louis XVI’s reign were lopped down and replanted in 1860. Because of the Franco-German war and the subsequent collapse of the Second Empire, replanting did not start until 1883.

    While he did put forth some effort, Napoleon III refrained from continuing his uncle’s more lavish endeavors. During the 1867 World’s Fair, the renowned furnishings that had been removed from the castle were returned courtesy of Empress Eugenie, who had a cult following because of Marie Antoinette.

    The fortress was used as the Prussian army’s command center during the siege of Paris in 1870. In January 1871, the Hall of Mirrors was the site of the proclamation of the German Empire. Thiers and his administration hid out there during the Commune and stayed there until 1879. The population of Versailles rose from 40,000 to 150,000 as it recovered its position as a government center.

    For both the Third and Fourth Republics’ presidential elections, the castle served as the designated location. After World War I, the Allies and Central Powers met in Versailles, France, in June 1919 to sign the Treaty of Versailles.

    Versailles was now a national palace available to the President of the Republic for use in entertaining visiting dignitaries and holding meetings of the Congress of the Parliament.

    What is the surface area of the Palace of Versailles?

    As the biggest castle in the world, the Château de Versailles surpasses even Windsor in size thanks to its massive surface area of almost 63,154 m2 and the 815 hectares of the adjacent park. The area is home to a wide variety of historical structures, including the Grand and Petit Trianon, as well as the Grand Canal and the Swiss water feature, both of which were designed by Le Nôtre.

    How many rooms are there at the Château de Versailles?

    The castle contains 2,300 rooms. There are also 67 staircases, 352 fireplaces, 2,153 windows, more than a hundred clocks, and the famous Hall of Mirrors is composed of 357 mirrors.

    Bibliography:

    1. Saule, Béatrix; Meyer, Daniel (2000). Versailles Visitor’s Guide. Versailles: Éditions Art-Lys. ISBN 9782854951172.
    2. Spaworth, Anthony (2008). Versailles: A Biography of a Palace. Macmillan Publishers. ISBN 978-0-3123-5785-6.
    3. Michelin Tyre PLC (1989). Île-de-France: The Region Around Paris. Harrow [England]: Michelin Tyre Public Ltd. Co. ISBN 9782060134116.
    4. Nolhac, Pierre de (1898). La création de Versailles sous Louis Quinze. Paris: H. Champion.
    5. Verlet, Pierre (1985). Le château de Versailles. Paris: Librairie Arthème Fayard.
    6. Louis Dusieux, Le Château de Versailles : Histoire de Description, Versailles, L. Bernard, 1881. 
    7. Pierre Clément, Lettres, instructions et mémoires de Colbert, vol. V, Paris, Imprimerie impériale, 1868. 
    8. Jean-François Solnon, Histoire de Versailles, Paris, Éditions Tempus, 2003. 
    9. Pierre Verlet, Le château de Versailles, Paris, Librairie Arthème Fayard, 1961. 
    10. André Félibien, Relation sur la feste de Versailles du dix-huitième Juillet mil six cens soixant-huit, Paris, P. Le Petit, 1668. 
    11. André Félibien, Description sommaire du chasteau de Versailles, Paris, 1674. 
  • Merovingian Dynasty: The First Race of The Kings of France

    Merovingian Dynasty: The First Race of The Kings of France

    Dynasty of Frankish kings descending from Merovech, the Merovingians ruled over Gaul until 751. This foundational dynasty of the French monarchy has long been subject to a “dark legend,” propagated since the 6th century by Gregory of Tours and later by their successors, the Carolingians, through the writings of Einhard. The Merovingians thus became the “do-nothing kings” in the imaginations of students, a perception that persisted until the 19th century and beyond.

    Aside from Clovis and for different reasons, Dagobert I, the Merovingian period was akin to a black hole in French history. Nevertheless, these kings and queens stood at the crossroads between the conclusion of “barbaric” antiquity and the Middle Ages, where the foundations of France were being laid.

    The Mythical Origin of the Merovingians

    "The lazy kings" (670-752) by E. Crété.
    “The lazy kings” (670-752) by E. Crété.

    The Merovingian dynasty has its roots in a tribe of Salian Franks, stemming from a branch of the Frankish people settled between the Rhine and the Scheldt. Its name is derived from the legendary Merovech, the son or nephew of Clodion the Hairy, who purportedly ruled from 448 to 457 over a tribe of Salian Franks and allied with the Roman general Aetius against the Huns in the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains. Initially, its power was confined to the realms of Cambrai and Tournai, situated between present-day France and Belgium. Following four more or less legendary rulers, who were merely tribal leaders, Clovis I, reigning from 481 to 511 and the son of Childeric I, emerged as the true founder through numerous conquests.

    In 498, Clovis and his warriors were baptized by the Bishop of Reims, Remigius, thereby gaining the support of the Catholic clergy and the Pope of Rome. He subjected the Burgundians to tribute in 500 and, at the Battle of Vouillé in 507, crushed the Visigoths, forcing them into Spain. With mastery over almost the entirety of Gaul, he soon consolidated the Salian and Ripuarian Franks under his authority. As the supreme leader of Germanic tribes in Gaul, Clovis worked towards amalgamating Frankish customs with Gallo-Roman legislations, giving rise to the Salic Law of the Frankish Kings.

    The Frankish Kingdom, One and Divisible

    At his death in 511, Clovis bequeathed to his sons an immense kingdom, with Paris as its capital and Catholicism as its religion. What followed may have appeared paradoxical, especially when compared to the actions of the dynasties that succeeded the Merovingians: divided among Clovis’s sons, the Frankish kingdom nevertheless remained united. Claude Gauvard described it as a ‘simultaneously unified and divisible’ realm. It was this apparent paradox that allowed the Merovingians to continue expanding their territory, becoming a continental power, and resisting civil wars. Only for a time…

    The division of 511 among Thierry, Clodomir, Clotaire, and Childebert is inspired by the Roman system of civitates, confirming the continuity between the Frankish kingdom and the imperial tradition. While territorially divided and possessing four capitals (Reims, Paris, Orléans, and Soissons), the political unity is genuine, primarily grounded in familial ties.

    However, one should not idealize the situation; succession disputes quickly arise with the deaths of Clovis’s first sons. Firstly, Clodomir (524), whose son Cloud must flee and become a cleric before his death, lends his name to a well-known city. The rest of Clodomir’s kingdom is divided among the three surviving brothers. At the death of the eldest, Thierry, complications arise as his son, Théodebert, enjoys prestige surpassing that of his uncles. He seizes the opportunity to assert ambitions beyond Gaul, minting gold coins with his effigy and provoking the anger of Emperor Justinian. Théodebert died in 548 without achieving his goals, despite conquests in Alemannia and Bavaria.

    The situation finally clears with the extinction of the senior branch and the demise of Childebert. This allows Clotaire I to reign alone until 561. Another division occurs upon his death, once again among his sons, now reduced to three by 567 (with the death of Charibert I). This marks the decisive moment when the Frankish kingdom is divided into three regions that will have a lasting impact: Austrasia (Rhine region, Champagne, and Aquitaine), Burgundy (former Burgundian kingdom and Kingdom of Orléans), and Neustria (Tournai region, “Normandy,” and the Paris region). This pivotal moment coincides swiftly with a genuine civil war erupting in 570. Before this, the Frankish kingdom had successfully asserted itself on the international stage.

    Merovigians: An “International” Power

    The sons of Clovis are determined to extend their father’s victories, despite internal divisions within the kingdom. United as the regnum francorum for foreign policy, they strategically exploited internal strife within the Burgundian kingdom, particularly religious disputes between Catholics and Arians.

    The Merovingians make their first attempt in 523, facing resistance, and a subsequent try a year later results in the loss of Clodomir. With cautiousness, they waited for a decade before launching another campaign led by Childebert I, Clotaire I, and Theodebert I. This time, they emerge victorious, absorbing the Burgundian kingdom while dividing the spoils among themselves.

    The successes of the Merovingians captured the attention of the emperor in Constantinople, with the primary objective being dominance over Italy, still under the Ostrogoths. Recognizing the Franks as both a threat and potential allies against the Byzantines, the Ostrogoths offered Provence to secure Frankish neutrality against the emperor. The Franks seized the opportunity and entered Provence in 537, gaining access to the Mediterranean. With this acquisition, they nearly re-established the unity of Roman Gaul, with only Septimania eluding their grasp from the Visigoths.

    Moving northward, Thierry I and Clotaire I form an alliance with the Saxons, defeating the king of Thuringia and annexing the western part of his kingdom in the same year as the Provence conquest. Two years later, Theodebert I conquered Alemannia and Bavaria, briefly extending his influence into Northern Italy. It was not until the arrival of the Lombards in the 560s that the Frankish advance halted, partly due to internal conflicts and civil war.

    The Civil War Hits the Kingdom of the Merovingians

    The death of Charibert I, son of Chlothar I, in 567 led to a new division of the Merovingian kingdom, sparking a genuine civil war among the three brothers: Sigebert, Chilperic, and Gontran. This conflict was also a result of risky marital alliances between the Merovingians and their neighbors, the Gothic rivals.

    Women played a central role in the political struggles of the late 6th century. The rivalry intensified between Brunehaut, wife of Austrasian king Sigebert I, and Fredegund, wife of Chilperic I, king of Neustria. Brunehaut, a Visigothic princess and daughter of King Athanagild, accused Fredegund of orchestrating the murder of her sister, Galswinthe, the previous wife of Chilperic I. The situation worsened as the king of the Visigoths died without an heir, intensifying ambitions, particularly those of Chilperic.

    This triggered the faida, characteristic of Germanic peoples, and a downward spiral ensued. The intrigues of the two queens led to the assassinations of Sigebert I (575) and then Chilperic I (584). Gontran attempted to remain somewhat aloof from the conflict, which escalated into armed warfare in the early 570s. After her husband’s death, Brunehaut held the reins of power in Austrasia, championing her son, Childebert II. He quickly opposed Fredegund’s son, Chlothar II, reigniting the war despite peace attempts initiated by Gontran (Andelot Pact, 587).

    The situation became more complicated with Gontran’s death in 592 and the entry of the sons of his nephew, Childebert II, who had succeeded him but died four years later. Theudebert II and Theuderic II continued the war against Chlothar II, who found himself in increasing difficulty.

    Nevertheless, Queen Brunehaut faced growing opposition in Austrasia, leading her to seek refuge in Burgundy with Theuderic II. However, she incurred the wrath of the local aristocracy there as well. Additionally, the sons of Childebert II entered into rivalries, much to the delight of Chlothar II. Theuderic II confined his brother Theudebert II to a monastery, and he himself died in 613. Brunehaut then attempted to regain control and install one of her great-grandsons, but the aristocrats handed her over to her rival, who subjected her to a long torture before executing her.

    The end of Antiquity and the beginning of the Middle Ages

    A segment of contemporary historians, demarcate the end of antiquity with the death of Brunehaut, a Visigothic princess described as “still very Roman.” The ascension of Chlothar II, and particularly his son Dagobert, “[seals] the unity of the Frankish kingdom” (according to the chronicle of Fredegar) and likely signifies its zenith before the rise of the Pippinids.

    The end of the conflict between Queens Brunhilda and Fredegund, and later their sons, allowed Chlothar II to ascend to the throne unopposed. During the early 7th century, both the king and, to a greater extent, his son Dagobert, played crucial roles in the zenith of the Merovingian dynasty.

    However, troubles arose swiftly, starting with the successors of Dagobert, leading to the emergence of what was not yet a distinct dynasty, the Pippinids. Through their strategic influence over Merovingian authority, the Pippinids eventually surpassed it, notably under the leadership of Charles Martel.

    Chlothar II and the Regna

    Supposed to be king since 584, Chlothar II eventually ruled alone after the deaths of his Merovingian rivals and Queen Brunehaut in the early 610s. However, the Frankish kingdom remained divided into three regna: Austrasia, Neustria, and Burgundy, causing unrest among the aristocracy. Clotaire II needed to legitimize his power and “seal the peace.”

    In 614, drawing inspiration from Clovis, he convened assemblies in Paris with both aristocrats and bishops, addressing both the religious and political issues of the kingdom almost simultaneously with the Edict of Paris, promulgated in October of that year. Chlothar II secured support from both the nobility and the clergy, solidifying his own authority. While personally reigning over Neustria, he remained the paramount sovereign of the regnum francorum, not hesitating to punish the aristocrats from other regna who showed tendencies toward independence, such as Godin, who attempted to force Chlothar II to appoint him mayor of the palace of Burgundy in 627.

    Tensions persisted, and the king continually negotiated with the regna, especially Austrasia. The aristocrats of Austrasia persuaded the king to send his young son Dagobert to them, allowing them to leverage his youth to exert real power over this regnum, strategically significant in the struggle against the Avars and the Wends. Among these nobles was a certain Pepin I, known as Pepin of Landen.

    The Reign of Dagobert I

    Two years before his death, Chlothar II once again convened the assemblies, and in the enacted acts, the idea of a sacred monarchy began to emerge. He died in 629, and his son Dagobert succeeded him, leaving Austrasia for Neustria. Dagobert’s legitimacy does not seem to be contested by the nobles, whether from Austrasia, where he comes from or from the other two realms.

    However, he has a brother, Caribert, whom he sends to Aquitaine, where he dies in 632. Dagobert I begins his reign with a journey to Burgundy to reassure the aristocracy about his intentions. He then settles in Paris. Saint Eloi, the goldsmith of his father, Chlothar II, and bishop of Saint Ouen, becomes his chief advisor.

    The “Austrasian problem” remains. The regnum is powerful; its nobles are difficult to control, holding strategic positions such as mayor of the palace. Nevertheless, Dagobert managed to install his son Sigebert on the Austrasian throne in 632.

    Two years later, he designates the kingdoms of Burgundy and Neustria for his newborn son, Clovis, thus ensuring his succession. Upon his death in 639, the Frankish kingdom was once again divided.

    Dagobert’s reign coincides with the emergence of Islam, particularly the early Muslim conquests. The Byzantine emperor was interested in the Frankish king, just like his predecessors. However, past experiences have served as a lesson, and while there are embassy exchanges (as in 629), the time is no longer for alliances.

    Nevertheless, it is known from Fredegar that the Franks were probably aware of the troubles of the Byzantine emperor Heraclius with the Arabs between 637 and 641.

    The foreign policy of the Merovingians in the early decades of the 7th century is far removed from Byzantine concerns in the Near East. Dagobert’s focus is on consolidating the borders of the regnum francorum, primarily in Aquitaine (with Gascony) and Brittany.

    He works on this around 635, but while he subdues the Basques, he must settle for a diplomatic agreement in Brittany without gaining control of the region.

    To the East, Thuringia, Alemannia, and then Bavaria were subjected to tribute, and their rulers were appointed by the Franks. Here, Dagobert takes advantage of the threat from the Wends, Slavs settled in Pannonia; however, he does not succeed in subduing them. Finally, the Frankish king begins to take an interest in Frisia but cannot establish a real foothold.

    The “Lazy Kings (Roi fainéant)” and the Mayors of the Palace

    Upon the death of Dagobert in 639, his sons Sigebert III and Clovis II divided the Merovingian kingdom. As anticipated, the former became the king of Austrasia, while the latter assumed the kingship of Neustria, also supporting the increasingly autonomous Burgundy. However, challenges arose swiftly.

    In Neustria, Clovis II was too young to rule. Power was shared between his mother Nanthilde, initially a servant married to Dagobert in 629 because Gomatrude had not produced a male heir, and the palace mayors, first Aega and later Erchinoald. The latter successfully arranged the marriage of the young king to Bathilde, an Anglo-Saxon slave, in 648. Exploiting her husband’s death in 657 and the subsequent demise of the mayor of the palace a year later, Bathilde seized power, attempting to reunify the regnum francorum amidst escalating rivalries with Austrasia.

    In the Eastern realm, the influence of palace mayors began during Dagobert’s reign with Pepin I. Sigebert III, the new king, sought to sideline the Pippinids by favoring another family. Nevertheless, Grimoald, Pepin’s son, also rose to this strategic position, labeled by Bishop Didier of Cahors as the “rector of the entire court or rather of the entire kingdom.” The Pippinids’ role was already so significant that historians briefly considered Sigebert III’s death in 656 as potentially triggering a Pippinid “coup d’État.”

    Ultimately, it was a matter of intricate succession and rivalry between the mayor of the palace and the queen. This underscores the decisive influence of individuals in this position, particularly the Pippinids. Neustrians and Bathilde’s intervention were necessary to sideline Grimoald and his protege Childebert, whom he had made king at the expense of Dagobert II, Sigebert’s son, exiled in Ireland. Nonetheless, it was Childeric II, Bathilde’s son, who became the king of Austrasia in 662.

    Merovingian Rivalries Benefit the Pippinids

    The challenges faced by the Pippinids proved to be temporary. The rivalry between Neustria and Austrasia, coupled with tensions among the nobility within the regna, ultimately facilitated their resurgence.

    In Neustria, Ebroin, the new mayor of the palace, removed Queen Balthild of Chelles in 665 and asserted control over King Chlothar III. Tensions escalated with the nobility, particularly in 673, when Ebroin imposed Theuderic III, the son of Clovis II, and Bathilde, as the successor to Chlothar III. This move sidelined Austrasian King Childeric II, the favored choice among the aristocrats.

    The situation was further complicated, leading Neustria into a civil war. Ebroin became one of its victims, assassinated in 682. However, even though successive kings faced challenges, the fundamental principle of the Merovingian dynasty remained unchallenged.

    The issues in Neustria eventually extended to Austrasia, where Dagobert II was assassinated a few years after returning from exile. The instability and vacancy in the position of the mayor of the palace after the death of Wulfoad, Ebroin’s rival, paved the way for the return of the Pippinids—a family still powerful but under scrutiny by other aristocrats.

    Duke Pepin II of Herstal, among them, became the mayor of the palace of Austrasia in the early 680s. In 687, he defeated his rivals from Neustria, who were allied with the Burgundians, at the Battle of Tertry, simultaneously seizing the treasury of Theuderic III.

    The End of the Merovingians

    The rise to power of the Mayor of the Palace, Pepin of Herstal, marks the beginning of the end for the Merovingians. However, the mayor of the palace allows the king to remain, merely stripping him of the essence of his power. The true authority rests in the hands of those who then bear the title “princes,” the mayors of the palaces of Neustria and Austrasia, exclusively from the Pippinid family.

    This influence solidified further with the successors of Pépin II, despite attempts at rebellion by other nobles upon his death in 714. His son, Charles, prevails against the Neustrians under Rainfroi in the 720s, as well as against external foes, the Arab-Berbers at Poitiers (Battle of Tours) in 732, and the Frisians two years later.

    Nevertheless, Charles Martel does not assume the title of king, even upon the death of the last Merovingian, Theuderic IV, in 737, when he bypasses the successor, Childeric III. The last descendants of Clovis, from the reign of Pepin II onward, have been labeled by Carolingian historiography (heirs of the Pippinids) as “do-nothing kings.” They are placed on the throne by the mayors of the palaces, tossed about by winds of politics and rivalries (as seen in the struggle between Rainfroi and Charles with Chilperic II), and no longer wield real power.

    However, it was not until 751, with the ascension of Charles’s son, Pepin the Short, that the Merovingian kings effectively made way for a new dynasty, that of the Carolingians.

    The List and Chronology of the Merovingian Kings

    During the Merovingian reign, the kingdom was often divided among the heirs of a king. With the succession of rulers, the Frankish kingdom was primarily divided into three territories: Austrasia, Neustria, and Burgundy. Thus, it is common for several kings to rule during the same period. Here is the list of Merovingian kings:

    • Childeric I (458 – 481) – First of the Merovingian kings.
    • Clovis I (481 – 511) – Ruled in Neustria and Austrasia.
    • Clodomir (511 – 524) – Ruled the kingdom of Orléans.
    • Theuderic I (511 – 534) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Childebert I (511 – 558) – Ruled in Burgundy.
    • Chlothar I “le Vieux” (511 – 561) – Ruled in Neustria, then Austrasia and Burgundy.
    • Theudeber I (534 – 548) – Ruled in Austrasia and Burgundy.
    • Thibaut (548 – 555) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Charibert I (561 – 567) – Ruled in Paris.
    • Sigebert I (561 – 575) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Chilperic I (561 – 584) – Ruled in Neustria.
    • Gontran (561 – 592) – Ruled in Burgundy.
    • Childebert II (575 – 596) – Ruled in Austrasia, then Burgundy.
    • Theudebert II (595 – 612) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Theuderic II (595 – 613) – Ruled in Burgundy.
    • Sigebert II (613 – 613) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Chlothar II “the Young” (584 – 629) – Ruled in Neustria, then Austrasia and Burgundy.
    • Dagobert I (623 – 639) – Ruled in Austrasia, then Neustria and Burgundy.
    • Charibert II (629 – 632) – Ruled in Aquitaine.
    • Sigebert III (639 – 656) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Clovis II (639 – 657) – Ruled in Neustria and Burgundy.
    • Childebert the Adopted (656 – 662) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Chlothar III (657 – 673) – Ruled in Neustria and Burgundy.
    • Childeric II (662 – 675) – Ruled in Austrasia, then Neustria and Burgundy.
    • Theuderic III (675 – 691) – Ruled in Neustria and Burgundy, then Austrasia.
    • Clovis III (675 – 676) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Dagobert II (676 – 679) – Ruled in Austrasia.
    • Clovis IV (691 – 695) – Ruled in Neustria, Austrasia, and Burgundy.
    • Childebert IV (695 – 711) – Ruled in Neustria, Austrasia, and Burgundy.
    • Dagobert III (711 – 715) – Ruled in Neustria, Austrasia, and Burgundy.
    • Chilperic II (715 – 721) – Ruled in Neustria, Austrasia, and Burgundy.
    • Chlothar IV (715 – 719) – Ruled in Neustria and Austrasia.
    • Theuderic IV (721 – 737) – Ruled in Neustria, Austrasia, and Burgundy.
    • Interregnum of Charles Martel (737-741), mayor of the palace.
    • Interregnum of Pepin the Short (741-743), mayor of the palace.
    • Childeric III (743 – 755) – Ruled in Neustria, Austrasia, and Burgundy.

    Key Dates In The Merovingian Era

    December 25, 496 — Baptism of Clovis

    Driven by his wife Clotilde, a Catholic Burgundian princess, Clovis is baptized by Bishop Remi, surrounded by his army. As the other kings were Arians, he became the first Catholic sovereign of the West.

    November 27, 511 — Death of Clovis

    The Frankish king died in Paris at the age of approximately 46. His kingdom is divided among his four sons: Theuderic I (Reims), Chlodomer (Orléans), Childebert I (Paris), and Chlothar I (Soissons). He is buried in the Basilica of the Holy Apostles in Paris.

    January 19, 639 — Death of Dagobert I

    The Frankish king, Dagobert I, is buried in the Basilica of Saint-Denis, which he had expanded in anticipation of his funeral. His reign, lasting for 10 years, was marked by the unification of the Frankish kingdom, to which he gave Paris as the capital. Austrasia, Neustria, Burgundy, and Aquitaine were united in 632. After his death, this unity will be broken: the illegitimate son of Dagobert, Sigebert III, will become the king of Austrasia, and his legitimate son, Clovis II, will ascend to the throne of Neustria and Burgundy.

    December 16, 714 — Death of Pepin the Younger

    Pepin of Herstal or Pepin the Younger, sovereign of the Frankish kingdoms of Neustria and Austrasia, dies, designating his 26-year-old illegitimate son, Charles Martel, as his sole successor. His wife, Plectrude, disagrees and bestows sovereignty over both palaces to her grandson, Theodebald. Charles Martel will have to contend with Plectrude’s ambitions and the uprisings of the Neustrian nobility before being able to reign supreme over the Frankish kingdom.

    October 22, 741 — Death of Charles Martel

    Although he was never king of the Franks, the mayor of the palaces of Austrasia and Neustria is buried in the Basilica of Saint-Denis among the kings. The Frankish kingdom is divided between his two sons, Carloman and Pepin the Short.

    November 751 — Pepin the Short, King of the Franks

    Having gained the support of the Pope, Pepin the Short deposed Childeric III and proclaimed himself king of the Franks in Soissons. His accession to the throne marks the end of the Merovingian dynasty and the birth of the Carolingian dynasty.

  • Dressing in Vikings: Their Clothes and Outfits

    Dressing in Vikings: Their Clothes and Outfits

    Linen and wool were the primary components of the Viking wardrobe. The wool came from domesticated long-fleece sheep, and the weaving was done on a giant vertical loom in the house. Simple stones with holes are used to stretch the warp threads, while the weft thread is pushed through using a hand-operated shuttle and packed with a fuller (pick).

    How did the Vikings produce their clothes?

    The production of wadmal, a thick and toasty fabric, required this labor, which was traditionally the domain of women. This fabric had many practical uses, including but not limited to garments, tents, and sails, but it also served as a medium of exchange in legal cases and as cargo during Viking voyages.

    In the Icelandic saga, The Story of Burnt Njal, the poem Darradarljod describes this craft within the setting of clan warfare. After the fight, on a Friday morning, a man named Daurrud set off. His curiosity piqued, he made his way to the pavilion and peered inside, where he observed ladies working at a loom. Men’s skulls served as the weights, their intestines as the weft and warp, a sword as the fuller (pick), and an arrow as the shuttle. Afterward, they sang out a couple of verses:

    This woof is y-woven
    With entrails of men,
    This warp is hardweighted
    With heads of the slain,
    Spears blood-besprinkled
    For spindles we use,
    Our loom ironbound,
    And arrows our reels;
    With swords for our shuttles
    This war-woof we work;
    So weave we, weird sisters,
    Our warwinning woof

    The Vikings had no problem dressing up for special events, even if it meant donning silk. Trade and theft were the means by which the silk was obtained. It was brought in by Rus’ traders from Constantinople and distributed across the major markets of northern Europe.

    Woolen clothes could be found in a variety of neutral tones, including brown, black, and gray. However, the materials could also be colored as a sign of wealth and success.

    Blue was one of the most popular color choices. The Scandinavian woad plant was used to produce it. It had a revered shade that called to mind the deep blue of Odin’s robe. It was also common to see red among Viking clothes. It was made from madder (Rubia tinctorum plant), which could be purchased in bulk from major European trade stations.

    Colors like green and yellow were also included. The yellow might come from a variety of sources, including the onion (which is grown in Scandinavia), broom, or ramie (a native Eastern Asian plant). Green was a blend of yellow and pastel.

    Because it was more challenging to dye linen, it frequently retained its natural color. The Vikings’ wardrobe also included a wide variety of furs, both domestically sourced and imported, including bear, reindeer, sable, and marten.

    Dress of the Viking men

    Dress of the Viking men

    Aesthetics were important to the Vikings. They washed or showered every Saturday. On this day, both sexes took long, soapy baths to clean themselves from head to toe.

    During this time, the Viking men shaved. After a quick rinse in the tub, they were ready for the ovens. A change of clothes allowed them to do the washing.

    A Viking’s underwear was comprised of a basic linen shirt and warm woolen underpants, perfect for the frigid Scandinavian winter. The Vikings then put on a long-sleeved garment with a length that reached about halfway down their thighs and was held in place by a leather belt that could be embellished with bronze plates.

    Then they donned a pair of trousers, which might be short and floaty, long and sticky, or short and puffy. Socks fastened with staples or straps rounded off the ensemble in the latter situation.

    A long cloak, lined with fur or down, and fastened on the right shoulder with a penannular fibula, was a common way to conceal the blouse.

    That way, the Vikings could simply draw the sword that’s fastened to the left side of the belt without having to use their right arm. The more well-off could be identified by the braids, embroidery, and gold and silver threads that adorn their tops and capes.

    A Viking man wore leather shoes or boots, both of which had a strap that went around the ankle and folded over the instep. Carefully maintaining their beards and long hair with combs crafted from cetacean bone or elk antlers was a hobby of theirs.

    It was possible that they could wear a variety of woolen caps and felt hats. When it was cold out, Viking men would be wearing mittens and large wool to keep their hands warm.

    Dress of the Viking women

    Dress of the Viking women

    On top of her sleeved or sleeveless tunic, a Viking woman wore a chasuble garment of pleated wool, which was kept in place by a pair of frequently oval fibulae at shoulder height.

    The Viking women fastened their sewing tools to the left side of this chasuble frock, which was embellished with braids and embroidery. A Viking woman wrapped herself with a shawl that she could tie around the waist or the lower back with her fibula.

    As a rule, a young girl’s hair was left down, whereas a married Viking woman’s hair was pulled back into a bun, ponytail, or braid. The back of the neck was shielded by a scarf that was fastened there. She had a penchant for pearl, amber, and gold bracelets, earrings, and necklaces.

    The Viking bride traditionally wore a linen veil on her wedding day, either to ward off the evil eye or because the groom had the honor of being the first to see his future wife without her veil. Since she was the head of the Viking household, she always had the keys to the house’s treasure and food storage boxes on her belt.

    The military dress of the Vikings

    The military dress of the Vikings
    (Image: Jack Keay)

    The standard Viking warrior’s arsenal included a sword, axe, spear, knife, and bow and arrows. You could protect yourself with a shield, a helmet, and a brooch. The Viking sword had two sides, and its magical strength came from the runic inscriptions that adorned them.

    This wooden scabbard had fur inside and leather outside. There were several varieties of Viking axes. As the Vikings’ standard weapon, it was a fearsome one, whether short or long in the handle, with the iron more or less broad, bent, and perhaps terminated with points. It could be thrown or used as a weapon in combat.

    You can think of the Viking spear as a javelin or a spear. The first was a projectile weapon, while the second was a thrusting weapon that could be used with more power thanks to the addition of stirrups.

    The diamond-shaped iron was secured to the handle with nails that have spiritual and legal significance. About a meter in circumference, the Viking shield had a circular shape. It was constructed from painted wood and had a metal frame. The handle was shielded by the iron shield boss (umbo) in the middle.

    The Vikings’ go-to protective gear consisted of a leather or wool cuirass and a boiled leather hat. However, a metal helmet was another option. Then, a nose extended it into a conical shape. Instead of a leather helmet, a Viking could wear a brooch, or a collection of metal plates strung together.

  • Joachim Murat: Son of the Revolution and Napoleon’s Sword

    Joachim Murat: Son of the Revolution and Napoleon’s Sword

    Joachim Murat (1767-1815), one of Napoleon Bonaparte‘s marshals, was known for his bravery and extravagance. He was also king of Naples from 1808 to 1815. After rising to prominence as one of the finest swordsmen and charmers of the Napoleonic period, this innkeeper’s son ascended to the throne and married the emperor’s sister. The Enlightenment ideals he defended made him a hero to Italian nationalists fighting for the peninsula’s union. Novelists would not have dared to create a character like him for a count in the 19th century due to his extraordinary fate, panache, boldness, and terrible conclusion.

    Joachim Murat: Son of the Revolution

    Fragment of portrait of Joachim Murat,
    Fragment of portrait of Joachim Murat, Prince d’Empire, Grand Duke of Clèves and of Berg, King of Naples under the name of Napoleon in 1808 (1767-1815), Marshal of France in 1804.

    On March 25, 1767, Joachim Murat entered the world as the son of innkeepers in Labastide-Fortunière (Lot). His father, a tiny bourgeois guy, served on many occasions as consul of his town and oversaw the distribution of church funds and other public assets. Joachim, the youngest of eleven children, was always destined for a career in the church. After studying for a while at the college of Cahors, he enrolled at the seminary of Toulouse, but was dismissed in 1787 due to a dispute with a fellow student.

    Joachim joined the 12th Cuirassier Regiment of the Ardennes and was stationed in the city, preferring the military uniform over the collar of a priest. His family opposed his newfound orientation and campaigned vigorously to have him fired. Joachim remained a horseman in the company of the knight Henry de Carrière. In this new universe, Joachim served as the 12th Cuirassier Regiment of Champagne in this regiment. Joachim was a marshal of lodgings when word of the French Revolution of 1789 spread around the area. Departure from his unit and subsequent return home had been mysterious.

    In the Lot again, he settled in Saint-Céré as a trader and immediately rose to prominence, joining political organizations and being chosen to represent his canton at the Fête de la Fédération in Paris on July 14, 1791. Along with him, he brought back the Parisian municipal flag after attending the event.

    Joachim went back to his old unit as a private despite his newfound status. It wasn’t until February of the following year, 1792, that he and two other department soldiers were officially selected to join Louis XVI‘s constitutional guard. But this corps fell well short of his expectations, and in March he publicly complained about the widespread anti-patriotism he had seen there. That guard was disbanded after he wrote to the Legislative Assembly advocating for its elimination.

    Rejoining the 12th Regiment of Chasseurs, Joachim quickly rose through the ranks, first to marshal of the logis and then to second lieutenant. Between 1792 and 1793, he was a captain aide-de-camp to General d’Urre and a squadron commander in the armies of Champagne and the North.

    Bonaparte’s sword

    Murat at the Battle of Abukir, painted by Antoine-Jean Gros (1804).
    Murat at the Battle of Abukir, painted by Antoine-Jean Gros (1804).

    On October 5, 1795, when royalist groups marched on the Convention in Paris, he was there. At the time, he was serving under the direction of a brigadier general named Bonaparte, who gave him this directive: “Do it swiftly, and with a sabre if you have to!” As the first step in a lengthy partnership, Murat enthusiastically carried out the general’s orders and returned the instruments of his triumph to him. After being promoted to brigade commander in 1796, he served as Bonaparte’s aide-de-camp in Italy.

    After making a name for himself at Dego and Mondovi, he and Junot were tasked with transporting captured enemy flags back to Paris. He returned to Italy, where he was discovered in Genoa and Livorno, on the Adige River, in the Tyrol. On September 15, while marching towards Mantoue, he was slightly wounded. General Bonaparte’s reputation as a skilled horseman was already established by the time he ended the Italian war with the Treaty of Compo-Formio. In 1797, he was in Rome while the Roman Republic was being proclaimed.

    Faithful to Bonaparte, Murat was part of the Egyptian expedition. In this fantastical country, he cultivated his reputation as a swordsman since he had no interest in scientific advancements. All the major engagements were attended by him, including the landing at Alexandria, the famous battle of the Pyramids (where he did not play a major role), the battle of Gaza, the battle in front of the infamous city of Saint-Jean-d’Acre, and most notably, the Battle of Abukir, where he covered himself in glory as the commander of the army’s vanguard. As a result of his daring attack, the Turks were driven back into the water.

    Bonaparte was pleased to be able to replace the memory of the naval failure at Aboukir with that of the land triumph of the same name when the Anglo-Turkish invasion plan failed. Murat was promoted to major general on the battlefield on July 25, 1799, in recognition of his victory.

    When he returned to France, he was there at Bonaparte’s side for the 18 Brumaire coup (9 and 10 November 1799). As the situation deteriorated in the Council of Five Hundred, President Lucien Bonaparte called for the delegates’ dismissal. The general marched into the Council chamber with his grenadiers, yelled, “Citizens, you are dissolved!” and then, in response to the deputies’ commotion, commanded his soldiers, “Get all these people out of here!” The deputies’ side saw a mass exodus as people rushed for the doors and windows. Eventually, Lucien would muster enough support to vote for the collapse of the Directory and the beginning of the Consulate, which would result in Bonaparte assuming control of the government.

    Caroline Bonaparte and her children
    Caroline Bonaparte and her children.

    Murat was at Bonaparte’s side throughout the riots of Vendémiaire, Italy, Egypt, and Brumaire, and he saved the Emperor’s life on more than one occasion. To deny the flamboyant swordsman the hand of his sister, who was obviously head over heels in love with him, was inexcusable. Therefore, on February 20, 1800, Murat (then 33 years old) wed Caroline Bonaparte (then 18 years old) and became the son-in-law of the First Consul Napoleon.

    The young spouse remounted his horse and participated in the second Italian war. After Napoleon promoted him to lieutenant general in the head of the reserve army, he also gave him responsibility over the cavalry. Napoleon I believed that Murat’s command of such a large number of mounted troops would be an effective military asset. The commander made his way across the Great St. Bernard Pass and conquered Milan. After that, he went to Marengo to see his brother-in-law and was awarded a sabre for his efforts. After spending some time at Dijon, he headed back to his favorite battlefield—Italy—to seize Tuscany and expel the Neapolitans from the Papal States. After negotiating a peace treaty with the King of Naples, he was appointed to lead the kingdom’s Southern Observation Army. He used this opportunity to grab control of Elba.

    Joachim Murat could now return to France and join local politics since that the country was at peace. In 1804 he was elected president of the Lot’s electoral college and a delegate to the Legislative Body, which launched his rise to power. After that, he was named governor of Paris. When the Duke of Enghien scandal arose, he was in charge, yet he was willing to just sign the judgment order.

    Murat: Marshal of the Empire

    Murat at the Battle of Jena, 14 October 1806.
    Murat at the Battle of Jena, 14 October 1806.

    As the Empire was declared, Murat, who was present at the coronation, was awarded every title possible for his participation, including that of Chief of the 12th Cohort, Grand Eagle of the Legion of Honor, Grand Admiral, and Grand Prince. Important among the new aristocracy, he accumulated a collection of paintings in his private hotel at the Elysée.

    At the resumption of hostilities with Austria in 1805, Marshal Murat was promoted to head the equestrian forces. He crossed into Bavaria and then marched straight on to Vienna, where he encountered little opposition. He used deception to convince the Austrians that an armistice had been struck, allowing him to capture control of the Danube’s crossings before they were destroyed. He proceeded to seek his share of glory beneath the sun of Austerlitz after routing a Russian army in Moravia. On March 30, 1806, he was elevated to the position of Grand Duke of Berg and Cleves by imperial edict.

    Murat embraced his new position as duke seriously and moved quickly to expand his duchy by annexing places that had been returned to Prussia, most notably the castle of Wessel. Negotiating a new export tariff with Napoleon was another issue on his mind. He personally oversaw the ducal army’s clothes, ordering fabric from Damascus and picking out the colors (crimson dolmans, “doe’s belly” colored pelisses, etc.).

    However, for Murat, the war was far from done; he had to charge towards the Prussians and take part in the Battle of Jena, in which the cavalry captured 14,000 prisoners. Next, he pursued the Prince of Hohenlohe until he surrendered, at which point he was able to take Stettin with the whole might of his army (16,000 troops, 60 cannons, and as many flags). However, the destruction of Prussia did not signal the end of the war, since the Russians continued to fight.

    The prince traveled through Warsaw, Poland, while dressed in his bright and colorful attire (gold thread embroidery, wide amaranth-colored trousers with gold braid, yellow leather boots, a hat with white feathers, and a plume of four ostrich feathers with a heron egret). This city, where Poniatowski presented him with the sword of Stephen Báthory (the Polish king of the late 16th century), would be his home for the entire month of January. This country wanted nothing more than to be free, and its prince simply wanted to rule.

    However, his brother-in-law, Napoleon, had no interest in seeing Poland restored, so he braved the elements to lead his troops in the horrible and brutal Battle of Eylau. Napoleon opted to go into combat with his cavalry and asked Murat, “Will you let us be eaten by these people?” while the outcome of the conflict remained in doubt. The enemy’s center was crushed, and the French army was rescued, all because of Joachim Murat’s decision to lead the largest cavalry charge in the history of the French Empire (which prompted Balzac to write “Le colonel Chabert”). Because of Murat’s eccentric clothing, everyone was shocked when he avoided being killed on every single charge he faced.

    Murat led the attack on Eylau while dressed in a fuzzy helmet with feathers, a fur cloak, and a white leotard. Russian troops were stunned when they were defeated at Friedland, but Napoleon met the Russian Czar at Tilsit. As Murat’s extravagant attire drew attention during the celebrations, Napoleon would tell him to “Go put on your general’s uniform; you look like Franconi” (a famous theater actor).

    Joachim Murat was promoted to the rank of lieutenant general by the Emperor of Spain upon his return to the Iberian Peninsula in July 1808. He was tasked with protecting strategic Spanish outposts as a safety net for Junot’s Portuguese campaign. His first order of business was to deal with the fallout from Napoleon’s deposing King Charles IV of Spain in favor of his son, Ferdinand VII, by the “guetapens” (ambush) of Bayonne.

    The Charge of the Mamelukes, 1808 by Francisco Goya.
    The Charge of the Mamelukes, 1808 by Francisco Goya.

    The citizens of Madrid revolted and began attacking the French troops. The Mameluke inspired fear among the rebels even as they stoked the flames of their animosity, and the city was soon in flames. Murat’s harsh repression was the only way he could restore order. Francisco Goya painted this scene to commemorate the historic events of “Dos y Tres de Mayo.”

    When the Bourbon dynasty in Spain tore itself apart, the throne became available to whomever claimed it, and the Prince may have believed at that point that he had a valid claim to power in the city he had just conquered. However, this did not occur, and Joseph Bonaparte, the former king of Naples, regained control of Spain. When Murat was asked to choose between the crowns of Naples and Portugal, he chose Italy since he had previously served as a commander there.

    Murat was relieved to see Savary arrive and assume control of Spain until Joseph Bonaparte could get there. He had now reached his breaking point; he could not bear to order against the national spirit of a people, and, what’s more, he was aware that his authority was being questioned now that another monarch had been installed. As a result of his illness, Murat had been experiencing high fevers, sleeplessness, headaches, nausea, and vomiting. Taking his family to the spa waters of Burgundy in Paris, he met his buddy Lannes before he took control of his realm.

    King of Naples, Joachim Murat

    Murat as King of Naples, c. 1812
    Murat as King of Naples, c. 1812.

    King Joachim I of Naples and Sicily had widespread popular support throughout his reign. On September 6, 1808, he arrived in Naples and was greeted by the city’s triumphal arches. It’s fair to say that when his people heard that a Frenchman was arriving, they feared the worst. They saw a tall, dark-haired guy with a stellar reputation as a swordsman and ornate costumes that were spot-on for the Italian way of life enter. Whatever title Murat held in the eyes of his people, whether viceroy or grand prefect, Napoleon made it plain that Murat was only a viceroy in the eyes of him.

    But Murat misunderstood and used it as inspiration to expand his dominion. He carried on Joseph’s reforms in every area, including the establishment of a national flag and army, the easing of conscription, the founding of a polytechnic university, the introduction of civil status, the publication of a new civil code, the suppression of brigandage, the establishment of new courts of first instance, and much more.

    Murat fancied himself an Enlightenment scion. As he realized he’d be helpless against the English without a fleet, he set up a school specifically for the purpose. He also began excavations at Herculaneum, a Roman city that had been obliterated by Mount Vesuvius, and set out to improve the appearance of his capital. Murat decreased ministry subsidies, streamlined tax collection, and negotiated a drop from 5% to 3% interest on the state’s debt as a result of the dire economic circumstances and the state’s mounting debt (to the great displeasure of France).

    After the English mocked him in front of his capital, he had no choice but to expel them from Capri in October 1808. It was none other than Hudson Lowe, the future jailer of Napoleon on Saint Helena, who led the English forces.

    It was 1810, and from his throne in Naples, King Joachim I observed the Austrian alliance and Napoleon’s marriage to Marie-Louise with skepticism. It was well known that the Austrians had their own opinions on Italy and backed the Bourbons in Naples, despite the latter’s questionable legality. Murat’s association with Italian nationalist groups was a subtle but effective way for him to further his personal objectives. For the sake of his people, on June 14, 1811, he issued an edict mandating the naturalization of all aliens who were receiving financial benefits from civil service jobs. In retaliation, Napoleon declared that all French citizens were also citizens of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies since it was a member of the Empire, even if this was not to the pleasure of the French.

    Joachim Murat took over as commander of the cavalry during the Russian expedition (French invasion of Russia) despite a tense relationship with his predecessor. The enemy withdrew until the Moscow, where a bloody but ultimately fruitless fight took place, in which the king stood out. The Cossacks, in particular, looked up to Murat as a hero because of his courage and flair.

    In the heat of combat, Murat raised his whip in a show of respect. Following the victory, the marshal advanced through Russia and took Moscow, but the city’s destruction caused the French army to flee. Returning to France after the uprising over the Malet incident (Malet coup of 1812), Napoleon put his faith in Murat to lead the reorganized armed forces. The latter stayed put and eventually handed over leadership to Eugène de Beauharnais so he could go back to Naples.

    After returning to his realm, Murat wasted no time in opening negotiations with Austria and England. Nonetheless, he never fully abandoned Napoleon’s cause and, in 1813, joined up with the French leader to head up the cavalry. Although he saw action at Dresden, the Imperial forces were ultimately routed at Leipzig (Battle of Leipzig). His perspective shifted from that of a Prince of the Empire to that of a King, and from that point on, he regarded himself as entirely responsible for the needs of his own country. His wife, Caroline, was also an important motivating factor. He signed the peace treaty with Austria on January 11, 1814, rescuing his kingdom by betraying Napoleon.

    However, the calm was only temporary. Upon Napoleon’s defeat and exile to Elba, Talleyrand advocated at the Congress of Vienna for the restoration of the Bourbon dynasty to the Kingdom of Naples. As you may imagine, Murat was anxious. There was danger in his realm. Against the Austrians, who wanted to maintain their zone of influence on the northern part of the peninsula, Murat planned to defend himself in Italy by depending on the nationalist groups, which he would be able to readily unite. Aware of the events unfolding in Elba, he knew that now was the time to win or die by following Napoleon if he returned.

    Statue of Joachim Murat on the façade of the Royal Palace of Naples.
    Statue of Joachim Murat on the façade of the Royal Palace of Naples.

    Murat saw his chance to fulfill his aim of raising and unifying all of Italy with the backing of the nationalists on March 1, 1815, when Napoleon landed at Golfe-Juan. On March 18, he declared war on Austria, issuing the now-famous statement from Rimini: “A scream is heard from the Alps to the Strait of Scylla, and this cry is: the freedom of Italy!” In Italian history books, Murat was no longer just a French puppet king; instead, he was elevated to the status of national hero and a forerunner of the Risorgimento (Unification of Italy). Because of this, the figure was rehabilitated on the peninsula towards the end of the 19th century, when unification took effect, and his statue still stands in Naples today.

    The king’s campaign was successful at the outset, and when the Austrians were driven back to the Po River, the city of Bologna was freed to the cheers of its citizens. However, his counteroffensive backfired, and he was eventually beaten at Tolentino and forced to withdraw and escape. Although he set off for Gaeta, the presence of the English navy prevented him from reaching his destination until he landed in France, where he remained until the Bourbons reestablished their rule over Naples. His wife Caroline, who had sought safety on an English vessel, saw the acclaim bestowed upon the new king.

    Murat: The fallen prince

    Murat's death sentence, as shown in the Naples State Archive
    Murat’s death sentence, as shown in the Naples State Archive.

    Murat was back in his home country, awaiting a summons from Napoleon. The latter was preparing for battle, and when one thinks of battle, one thinks of an army; when one thinks of an army, one thinks of cavalry, and when one thinks of cavalry, one thinks of Murat. But his wait was in vain since Napoleon never called him, and it was Michel Ney who spearheaded the cavalry attacks at Waterloo (Battle of Waterloo). Many argue that a different result would have been achieved if a cavalryman of his caliber had been in charge in front of the English lines. An unprovable claim that belongs in the domain of uchronia. As the coalition troops closed in on France, Murat fled to Corsica, where he was greeted with open arms and where the soldiers rallied to support him.

    After being pursued by General Jean-Antoine Verdier, Murat escaped to Ajaccio, where the National Guards were waiting to salute him. Not being a leader of the Corsican resistance was less important to him than reclaiming his kingdom. A man of great bravado, Murat was much admired. He set out with 250 soldiers on the evening of September 28, 1815, aboard the flotilla of Barbara, a former corsair whom he had elevated to the rank of Neapolitan baron and captain of a frigate. Did he conspire against his previous monarch?

    Castello di Pizzo, Murat's place of imprisonment and execution
    Castello di Pizzo, Murat’s place of imprisonment and execution.

    Though Murat preferred to disembark at Trieste, Barbara used their hunger as an excuse to go with him to Pizzo, where he claimed to still have partisans. Unfortunately, the flotilla was scattered by a storm, and only two ships, or roughly thirty men, were able to accompany him. They expected to find partisans in Pizzo, but instead they encountered a community hostile due to the recollection of Joachim Murat’s brutal suppression of brigandage in the area. After an argument on October 8, 1815, he was captured and transported to the fort of Pizzo.

    Murat, foreseeing his own death, sent a farewell letter to his wife. He flatly rejected the mock trial that was suggested for him by the Court Martial. When the Court Martial began its trial, the order of execution had already come from Naples; therefore, he was correct on this point. Upon hearing his sentence in the early afternoon of October 13, 1815, Murat had half an hour to pray for mercy before being led to the castle plaza and executed by firing squad.

    Joachim Murat asked them, “Where should I sit?” with a stunning lack of complexity. Even though a chair and a ribbon were offered to him, he politely declined. He loosened his shirt to expose his chest and gave the following instructions to his executioners: “Soldiers, respect the face and aim at the heart.” He had just been struck in the chest and hand before he went down. Since he showed signs of life, the police officer gave the order to fire two more bullets. Then his corpse was added to the rest of the graves. The Bourbons may have been able to bury the corpse, but they couldn’t bury the legend of the man formerly known as “the King of the Braves and the Bravest of the Kings.”

    Bibliography:

    1. Emsley, Clive (2014). Napoleon: Conquest, Reform and Reorganisation. Routledge. ISBN 978-1317610281.
    2. Fisher, Herbert A. L. (1903). Studies in Napoleonic Statesmanship Germany. Oxford: Clarendon press.
    3. Kircheisen, F.M. (2010). Memoires Of Napoleon I.
    4. Phipps, Ramsey Weston (1926). Armies of the First French Republic: And the Rise of the Marshals of Napoleon I. Oxford University Press, H. Milford.
  • Battle of Cannae (216 BC): The Last Victory of Hannibal

    Battle of Cannae (216 BC): The Last Victory of Hannibal

    In the second Punic War (Punic Wars), on August 2, 216 BC, a Roman army and Hannibal’s army fought a bloody battle near the city of Cannae (Apulia) called the Battle of Cannes. In the summer of 216 BC, after crossing the Alps, the Carthaginian general’s troops set up camp on the banks of the Aufidus River near Cannes. The Roman army led by consuls Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terentius Varro tried to destroy them, but the Carthaginians won the battle, which was very bloody. Even though the Roman army was bigger, this battle was a terrible loss for them. It also put the Carthaginian general Hannibal on the map as one of the best military strategists. His strategies are still taught in some military schools.

    Towards the Four-Way Pass

    Hannibal's route of invasion.
    Hannibal’s route of invasion.

    Hannibal took up arms in 218 BC. He crossed Spain and southern Gaul, then the Alps, and poured his armies into Italy. He surprised the Romans in the Po Valley, won the battles of Ticino and Trebia, and then joined the Celts, who had just been defeated by the Romans. In 217 BC, he did it again without waiting for the winter to end. He caught his opponents by surprise. At the Battle of the Trasimene Lake, he beat the Roman army by taking advantage of the terrain and weather.

    Rome paid a very high price for these three fights. More than 30,000 people died, and Rome’s reputation with its allies was hurt. Hannibal, on the other hand, tried to show himself as the new Alexander. He was a great tactician in the military, and he also played on the political chessboard, promising to bring “freedom” to the Italian cities that were under the control of the Romans. After that, Rome used a strategy called “temporization,” which meant avoiding frontal attacks and constantly harassing the Punic army in an “attrition war.” Still, it decided to stop Hannibal from doing what he was doing, which was destroying Apulia, Samnium, and Campania.

    In 216 BC, Lucius Aemilius Paullus, also known as Paulus, and Gaius Terentius Varro, also known as Varro, became the new consuls. Paulus liked to harass and wear out the African troops, while Caius Terentius Varro, also known as Varro, wanted direct confrontation. Meanwhile, the common people were getting tired of the fighting. Polybius, a Greek historian, said that the Punic troops were facing off against no less than eight legions, which was “a number that had never been reached before.” Together with its allies in Italy, the Roman army had close to 80,000 men. On his side, Hannibal’s army of about 50,000 men was still raiding in southern Italy. They raided the warehouses of corn for the Roman army in a small city in Apulia called Cannes, which was now called Canne della Battaglia.

    Battle of Cannes: Hannibal reaching the top

    On August 2, 216 BC, the two armies would have their most important meeting. The Roman army was then led by Varro, who made each consul take charge of one day every two. He also made each soldier take on the most traditional form. Paulus was in charge of the right wing, while the allies’ cavalry took care of the left. At the level of the infantry in the center, there was nothing new in terms of strategy. The hard core was formed by the Roman legions, which were known to be the best trained, and the wings were formed by the allied legions later.

    Hannibal came up with the most daring plan which was characterized by its will to fight a battle of encirclement and annihilation. In the middle, facing the Roman legions, he put the Gallic infantry. On either side, he put its best troops, the African heavy infantry, which he commands himself. The cavalry was on the wings. Hasdrubal Barca was in charge of the Iberians and Gauls on the left, and Hanno was in charge of the Numidians on the right.

    The Carthaginian general’s plan was to move his center (the Gallic infantry) forward. The Romans, however, rushed to the attack and quickly pushed the Gallic infantry back. The cavalry fights on the wings, quickly turning in favor of the Punic. Hasdrubal wiped out the Roman cavalrymen and came to help Hannon by pushing the Italian allies’ cavalry back. He then went backwards. It was then too late for the Roman infantry, which could see that the enemy was getting closer and closer while it thought victory was close. In fact, if the Gauls in the middle moved back, they didn’t give up. This let the heavy Punic infantry gradually surround them on the left and right by conversion, while the horsemen, freed from their Italian opposite, stopped any possible retreat and completely closed the trap. The trap worked perfectly, and the rest of the battle of Cannes was just a massacre.

    Battle of Cannes: The Roman army’s mortuary field

    One of Rome’s biggest armies was wiped out in combat. Despite discrepancies in survivor counts, it was widely accepted that 45,000 Roman troops were killed and 20,000 were captured. Only around 15,000 males managed to escape. The bleeding was so bad that even Roman senators and high-ranking magistrates were afflicted. Military tribunes, former consuls, bankers, and quaestors were among the dead, as was Lucius Aemilius Paullus. Varro escaped with a young soldier called Scipio, who at the time was not recognized as African but who would soon surpass the master since he was an excellent pupil. Only roughly 6,000 of Hannibal’s troops were killed, but they were mostly Gallic, an unstable and disorderly bunch.

    Despite Rome’s best efforts, it seemed they were going to lose the battle with Carthage, one of their most difficult conflicts. One of Hannibal’s subordinates was said to have informed Titus Livius, “You know how to win, Hannibal, but you don’t know how to exploit your triumph.” In any case, Rome would have had to concede defeat and respond with military and political measures. You could still win the war even if you lost a battle.

    Bibliography:

    1. Plutarch (1916). “Life of Fabius Maximus”. Loeb Classical Library.
    2. Polybius, The Histories, translation by W.R. Paton.
    3. Briscoe, John & Simon Hornblower, eds. (2020). Livy: Ab urbe condita Book XXII. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-48014-7.
    4. Cicéron (trad. Maurice Testard), Les Devoirs, Les Belles Lettres, 1965.
    5. Goldsworthy, Adrian (2001). Cannae. London: Cassell. ISBN 0-304-35714-6.
    6. Yann Le Bohec, Histoire militaire des guerres puniques, Éditions du Rocher, 1996.
  • Indus Valley Civilization: Mystery of a vanished giant empire

    Indus Valley Civilization: Mystery of a vanished giant empire

    The Indus culture remains the most enigmatic of the great sophisticated civilizations due to its indecipherable writing, astonishingly contemporary cities, and massive empire, the end of which is just as unknown as its commencement. Little is known about it, despite the fact that it influenced a large area about 5,000 years ago.

    Many people are unaware that the Indus civilization is one of the three major early sophisticated civilizations. Indeed, little is known about these people despite the fact that their dominion was once greater than that of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia put together. The only thing we know for sure is that they had a profound impact on the whole region, which is now Pakistan, as well as on sections of India and Afghanistan, beginning approximately 2800 B.C.

    The reasons for this culture’s emergence and subsequent fall, some 700 years apart, remain unknown. Also, nobody knows for sure what language the locals spoke, and nobody has been able to understand the writing, which does not seem to be connected to any of the established scripts.

    The Indus civilization’s early years

    Early human settlement and the domestication of animals and plants started in the Indus River area, where Stone Age artifacts indicate people began to dwell some 10,000 years ago. They were a typical agricultural society from around 6500 B.C. forward, when they began raising cattle and growing wheat, among other crops.

    At about 2600 B.C., however, everything changed. Huge cities home to thousands of people sprung up all throughout the Indus basin. Harappa and Mohenjo-daro are two of these cities that have provided archaeologists with their first glimpses of these mysterious people and their way of life.

    The Indus city plans are very similar, giving the impression that they were all drawn out at the same time. Buildings and streets inside them, as shown by excavations, adhered to a rigorous geometric layout, startlingly comparable to the districts of contemporary towns. Broad avenues ran along north to south, while narrower streets intersected at right angles, much like the squares on a chessboard.

    A standardized architecture

    A majority of the residences in the neighborhood were large rectangles. Mohenjo-daro and Harappa had a very consistent exterior look; unlike the colossal structures typical of Mesopotamia, they were designed with functionality in mind. Not even enormous temples or palaces were built. The majority of the structures were made from burned mud bricks, and they all followed the same design: Typically, after passing through a vestibule, one would enter a courtyard that the rest of the rooms would be organized around. Some of the homes included lofts or roof decks that could be used as extra living space.

    Researchers have speculated that the Indus civilization may have been the first to have advanced urban planning because of its remarkably practical, cohesive structure and design.

    Water from the tap and central sewerage

    Furthermore, the remainder of the infrastructure in these Bronze Age towns was remarkably advanced for its time. Mohenjo-daro, for instance, had a public bath and a central well about 4,000 years ago. Many people, however, had their own very modest wells dug into the mud brick walls of their homes in order to get potable water. Some structures may have even had running water piped in via these underground networks. According to the excavations, the sewage from the homes was carried through clay pipes into the municipal sewer system, which consisted of sewers covered with bricks and ran down the main streets.

    Much of Mohenjo-daro was constructed on a plateau to prevent it from flooding, with watchtowers and fortifications along its southern side to ward off invaders. Raw materials for jewelry production and a large number of beads point to the existence of workshops in addition to residential structures in these cities. Some of these raw minerals could only be sourced from Central Asia or farther afield, indicating the sophisticated trading network that the ancient Indus society had.

    Fixed units of measurement and reference weights

    One such indicator of the Indus culture’s sophisticated level 4,500 years ago is its unified and astoundingly exact system of units of measurement. Buildings, plazas, and even the mud bricks themselves all seem to adhere to consistent proportions, according to surveys of Indus towns. These may all be reduced to 0.69 inches (17.6 mm), the putatively fundamental measuring unit of the Indus civilization.

    Precise rules

    In 2008, researchers unearthed the clay crossbeam of a scale with lines cut into it at regular intervals—every 0.69 inches—in the Indus city of Kalibangan. Subunits of this measurement, called angulam, were reportedly recognized by many smaller markings in between. It is already clear to Indus specialists that the builders at Harappa adhered to strict standards of proportion and beauty, rather than relying on chance.

    Early on in the excavations at Mohenjo-daro in 1931, researchers uncovered a number of cube- and cuboid-shaped blocks of limestone of varying sizes, proving that the people of the Indus empire were also methodical when it came to weight. Extensive digging has uncovered similar blocks from other cities, each one looking like an egg next to the originals. What were they, though?

    Reference weights for trade

    Clues might be gleaned from the places where the blocks were unearthed, since they often turned up with artifacts associated with commerce such as seals and merchandise. These blocks have now been identified as reference weights and utilized in the commerce sector for the purpose of measuring items. The tiniest bricks weighed 0.89 grams (0.031 ounces), which is lighter than the gram unit.

    Within a certain weight category, there is only roughly a 6% variation in Indus weights.

    The Indus script, which has yet to be deciphered

    A depiction of the single horned bull in an Indus seal with Indus hieroglyphs.
    A depiction of the single horned bull in an Indus seal with Indus hieroglyphs.

    The Indus people’s writing looks like a blend between Egyptian hieroglyphics and Sumerian cuneiform, with its use of triangles, circles with cross-like letters, and plant-like symbols. Neither of those things has anything to do with it, and the meaning of its characters is still a mystery.

    One explanation is that, unlike the lengthy Mesopotamian text tablets, Indus characters often occur in clusters of no more than six. They are often affixed to clay seals, miniature tablets, and talisman-like amulets. They are often mixed with animal representations, particularly on the seals.

    Mysterious signs and animal symbols

    It is possible that the animals’ emblems denoted certain people or clans, and that the names or legitimacy of the owners were indicated by the text. Clay jars, metal implements, and even gold jewelry have all been unearthed with the mysterious writing. Names found in that area may also date back approximately 5,000 years to the people who lived in the Indus Valley.

    However, the Indus script remains as mysterious as it was when first found, despite decades of efforts to translate it. Not only is it unclear what language the strings were written in, but it’s also possible that the same script was used for more than one language. While some in the academic community are convinced that it is a genuine script, others see the symbols not for what they are, but for what they represent, such as religious or political iconography.

    Mathematical aid

    But Mumbai’s Tata Institute of Basic Research researcher Mayank Vahia disputes this. A few years ago, he utilized mathematics to crack the code of the puzzling characters and found evidence that they were, in fact, a legitimate script with a set canon of symbols and an underlying grammar.

    The research conducted by Vahia and his coworkers is founded on the so-called Markov model, a statistical technique for forecasting the likelihood of an occurrence based on its antecedents. Insights into the Indus script’s underlying grammatical structure can be gained using the statistical approach. Any meaning attributed to a symbol during the decipherment process using such a model must be consistent with the meanings of the symbols that came before and after it.

    A specific sequence

    The studies verify the existence of meaning in the string of characters. If researchers randomly switched characters in their model or transplanted a hieroglyph from one set of characters to a sequence on another artifact, the likelihood of the new sequence matching the predicted language and its patterns dropped quickly. These findings provide more evidence that Indus writing follows a consistent set of rules.

    It seems to be adaptable as well. Given that seals with sequences of these characters have been uncovered in both the Indus and Mesopotamian regions. However, the signs there are ordered differently from those from the Indus Valley, suggesting that the identical symbol sequences may have had a distinct meaning in that region. The possibility that the Indus script may have been used to express a variety of themes in western Asia is an intriguing finding. The concept that the hieroglyphs were only religious or political symbols is hard to square with the available evidence.

    The meaning of the mysterious symbols, and whether or not they represent actual writing, are still mysteries. In this case, archaeologists and linguists are banking on luck in the shape of fresh discoveries that may provide more insight. Nothing will be certain until a multilingual tablet, a type of Indus Rosetta Stone, is discovered.

    How peaceful was Indus Valley Civilization?

    Archaeological digs in the town remnants have uncovered no indications of conflict or violence, neither in the destruction of structures nor in combat scenes on art items or pottery, which has long been one of the most remarkable elements of the mysterious Indus civilization. No signs of a superior or subordinate caste or a governing elite were to be found.

    Therefore, it was theorized that the Indus civilization was structured more like a “grassroots government,” in which the populace gave political and religious leaders little power and the social order was relatively flat. As a result, it was assumed that very little physical force was required to maintain order in society.

    However, throughout the summer of 2012, archaeologists discovered objects that broke, or at least severely rattled, the picture of the empire as a place of peace. 160 corpses from three Harappan tombs were analyzed by a team of experts headed by Gwen Robbins Schug of Appalachian State University in Boone. Numerous traces of severe injuries were discovered, most notably in bones dating to the late Indus civilization era (ca. 1900–1700 BC).

    Signs of beatings and fightings

    15 percent or more of the skulls in a tomb from this time period showed signs of violence, such as cracks or fractures in the top of the skull from a hit from a blunt weapon or other damage to the bones. A male in his mid-30s had a broken nose and a cut across his forehead from a sharp weapon, and a lady had been battered to death, judging by the fractured skull.

    The skull trauma does not seem to have resulted from an accident or to be consistent with postmortem trauma. Experts say the evidence points inexorably to violent interactions between people. They claim that women and children were disproportionately affected by such violence at that period. The researchers concluded that the level of violence in Harappa was very high, even by city standards, and was the highest of any Southeast Asian region at the time. That begs the question, why?

    Turmoil and violence

    By comparing them to tombs and corpses from previous eras of the Indus civilization, researchers were able to deduce that signs of violence were, in fact, exceedingly uncommon. It seems that murder and manslaughter were very rare even when Harappa had more than 30,000 residents. However, something shifted about 1900 B.C., and the Indus civilization started to crumble.

    This era was a time of social upheaval all throughout the known world, as many towns were abandoned and people moved out of the countryside. The rise in hostility and violence may be traced back to this period of change and the stress and uncertainty it produced among the populace.

    The inhabitants of Harappa’s metropolis clearly experienced regular bouts of war and hardship. This shows that, at least during this time period, the Indus Empire was not a very peaceful one.

    What caused the demise of the Indus Valley Civilization?

    The fall of the Indus civilization is baffling, as is the fall of many other early great civilizations. Why did this civilization, which once occupied 390,000 square miles (1 million square km) and accounted for up to 10 percent of the world’s population, go away over time? What caused people to abandon the Indus Valley’s major cities and, in many cases, the whole area after 700 years?

    There are many proposed explanations for this mystery, but there are only a few solid pieces of evidence. Social upheaval, invasions by neighboring peoples, and a reduction in commerce are all possible explanations that have been proposed by some experts. While some believe that internal strife or external threats to civilization led to its demise, others point to the weather as the likely culprit.

    Floods and dry seasons

    The Indus Valley and its tributaries were very fertile at the period of the Indus culture, providing abundant opportunities for proper agriculture to feed even bigger towns. Nonetheless, the glacial meltwater from the Himalayas and a considerably less predictable factor: the monsoon, were responsible for this fertile soil and water supply.

    In the upstream areas, near the rivers’ sources, the rain was heaviest during the wet season. This water then rolled down the rivers again, generating floods, as it does to this day in Bangladesh and Pakistan, in the form of flash floods and high tides. As was the case with the Nile at the same time, the fertile soil along the riverbanks was made possible by the river’s periodic flooding.

    However, unlike ancient Egyptians and even Mesopotamian societies, those who lived in the Indus Valley reportedly didn’t try to manage and regulate these floods by means of irrigation systems. A traditional irrigation farming system has not left any traces that we can find. Could this have been the beginning of the downfall?

    Did the monsoon contribute to the decline of the Indus Valley Civilization?

    How did weather contribute to the demise of the Indus civilization? After all, other sophisticated cultures like the Maya and the Khmer Empire at Angkor Wat fell victim to dry seasons, too. In fact, in 2012, researchers uncovered Indus culture-related data supporting the same thing.

    The researchers began by developing a computerized topography model of the Indus Valley, which was done by Liviu Giosan of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and his colleagues. The researchers dug pits and sifted through the silt to piece together the history of the region and the river movements within it. University College London co-author Dorian Fuller discusses how the discovery of this geological data allowed the team to integrate prior knowledge of Indus communities, climate, and agricultural practices.

    Climate-friendly, at least initially

    The results of the analysis showed that the climate had a major impact on the development of the Indus civilization. Several centuries passed before the first settlements were established in this area, and the environment gradually became drier as a result. The researchers estimate that the height of this dry era occurred about 3200 B.C., which is also when the Indus civilization started to develop.

    They believe this is not a coincidence, since climatic change during this period reduced the severity of flash floods along the Indus and its tributaries, but still caused sufficient flooding to enrich the soil in the areas close to the rivers. In particular, the fertile soil and plentiful water supply in the plains where the Indus meets its three connected tributaries—the Jhelum, the Chenab, and the Ravi—made for abundant crops.

    Harappa, too, called this place home, since it was nestled within a chain of hills not far from the river’s lush floodplains. Further to the northeast, in the Ghaggar-Hakra river system’s basin, a second population center emerged. The monsoon rains were the primary supply of water for these rivers, not the melting snow. That’s why experts say there weren’t any devastating spring floods, but there was plenty of water throughout the rainy season.

    The Himalayas provide a safe haven

    Unfortunately, this paradise did not endure. Actually, the drought became much worse. As the monsoon moved east, the Ganges area began receiving more precipitation than the Indus basin. Around 1900 B.C., the Indus River and its tributaries became less prone to catastrophic floods, and large swaths of the southern Ghaggar-Hakra river system were without water for months at a time.

    “The expansion of Indus Civilization-era communities near the Ghaggar-Hakra system’s birthplace can also be explained by this,” Giosan says. It’s because even at the foot of the Himalayas, there were still modest floods that permitted at least one harvest a year. However, this repeated climatic change proved disastrous for the tens of thousands of people living in the lowlands’ megacities. As a result, the fields’ ability to provide for the ever-increasing food needs of the populace was severely compromised by the arid weather.

    Time to emigrate

    If water was becoming more limited, then why didn’t the people of Harappa and the other settlements at least create an irrigation system? Because they could have done something far less difficult. The people of the Indus were able to expand into the wetter lands to the east, towards the Ganges River, whereas the people of Mesopotamia and Egypt were hemmed in by deserts and arid plains. Nonetheless, this movement reduced the overall population density in the Indus Valley.

    As the water supply dwindled, people increasingly stopped living in cities and instead settled in smaller communities. It’s likely that society at the time was particularly susceptible to various forms of disruption because of the severity with which the environment had changed. But even this doesn’t explain all that went wrong with the Indus civilization in a single, deterministic explanation. Therefore, it is still not officially known what caused the Indus civilization to collapse.