Category: History

Witness the transformation across time and interpret the past of human societies while shedding light on the most prominent events.

  • Eleazar: Story of a Priest in the Hebrew Bible

    Eleazar: Story of a Priest in the Hebrew Bible

    • Eleazar succeeded his father Aaron as the Jewish people’s second High Priest.
    • He played crucial roles in Jewish ceremonies, offerings, and decisions within the priesthood.
    • Eleazar, alongside Joshua, helped divide the promised land among the Israelite tribes.
    • His lineage continued through his son Phinehas and ensured priestly succession.

    According to the Hebrew Bible and the Old Testament of the Christian Bible, Eleazar (Hebrew: אֶלְעָזָר, Elʽazar, meaning “God (El) has helped”) was a priest from the tribe of Levi and the second High Priest of the Jewish people, succeeding his father Aaron. Eleazar was Moses’ nephew. Elisheba, a member of the Judahite tribe and the sister of Nahshon, was Eleazar’s mother. Nadab and Abihu were his older brothers, while Ithamar was the name of his youngest sibling. On Mount Sinai, Eleazar and his brothers joined their father in being anointed as priests. Eleazar, Aaron’s son, married one of Putiel’s daughters and had a son, Phinehas, who succeeded his father as High Priest.

    The Israelites’ wilderness journey is believed to have taken place around the 13th century BCE. Eleazar’s involvement as the high priest and his role in the allocation of territories in the Promised Land occurred during this period.

    Eleazar’s Task

    moses aaron Most Holy Place male goat sacrifice

    Eleazar served as a priest in a number of capacities for the Israelites while they traveled through the desert on their way to Canaan. Even though grieving was banned for the Israelites in this situation, he and his brother Ithamar resumed their responsibilities as priests immediately after their brothers Nadab and Abihu were killed by the retribution of God’s fire. Because God’s anointing oil was on them, they were confined to the front of the Tent of Meeting (Tabernacle).

    In their first worship ceremony, they botched the sin sacrifice by letting the male goat burn to ash instead of being eaten in the Most Holy Place. Moses rebuked them for it, but their father Aaron eventually settled them down.

    Eleazar took charge of the Levites guarding the sacred objects while on the road. Before the camp could move, Joshua, his father Aaron, and his brother Ithamar had to enter the Holy Tent to prepare the Ark of the Covenant for travel by removing the veil, wrapping it with a covering of dolphin skin, and placing it on a fabric that was dark purple.

    Ark of the Covenant
    Moses and Joshua before the Ark of the Covenant (by James Tissot, c. 1900)

    In addition, a dark purple cloth and the serving dishes, utensils, and pitchers were to be laid out on the showbread table. It was intended to showcase the Presence’s bread. They then place a crimson fabric on top, a covering made of dolphin skin, and the poles of the Ark. The light source, its lamps, wick trimmers, trays, and oil containers were to be covered with a dark purple fabric.

    The Kohathites were to come and transport the sacred furniture and all the holy artifacts once Aaron and his sons had completed covering them, just before the camp moved away; however, no Kohathite was to touch the holy things under penalty of death. Eleazar was also in charge of the regular grain sacrifice, the aromatic incense, and the anointing oil. Everything in the Tabernacle, from the furnishings to the holy items, was under his purview.

    A Rebellion Against Moses

    Eleazar was tasked with retrieving the censers from the flames and having them hammered into sheets to overlay the altar as a memorial for the Israelites after Korah, son of Izhar, son of Kohath (Kehath), son of Levi, and his followers rebelled against Moses and were swallowed by the earth while 250 of his followers were consumed by fire from God while holding their censers.

    Eleazar was given a spotless, young red heifer that had never been yoked in order to use in the ceremonial cleaning water. The heifer was to be killed in front of him, away from the camp. Eleazar was then tasked with sprinkling the blood of the sacrifice seven times toward the entrance of the Tent of Meeting. After that, everything about the heifer—including its hide, meat, blood, and intestines—was to be burned in front of his eyes. Tossing cedar wood, hyssop, and scarlet wool upon the ablaze cow was Eleazar’s assignment.

    Then he could enter the camp after washing his garments and bathing himself with water, but he remained ceremonially unclean until dark. A ceremonially clean man was responsible for collecting the heifer’s ashes and placing them in a clean location outside of camp. The Israelite community was obligated to save these items for use in the sacrificial water, which was used to atone for sins.

    The Death of Aaron

    Moses was told to take Aaron and Eleazar to Mount Hor as Aaron lay dying. Aaron died on the mountainside after Moses took his clothes and placed them on Eleazar. After that, Moses and Eleazar came down the mountain.

    Moses and Eleazar were tasked with taking a headcount of all the Israelites who were at least 20 years old and physically able to serve in the military on the plains of Moab between the Jordan River and Jericho.

    Eleazar helped Moses judge disputes, including the dispute between Zelophehad’s daughters.

    The Urim and Thummim were used by Eleazar, the priest, to discern God’s will when Joshua, son of Nun, was anointed to replace Moses. Joshua would stand before Eleazar and Eleazar would utilize the Urim to ascertain God’s will for Joshua.

    The Israelite army returned to the camp on the plains of Moab by the Jordan near Jericho with prisoners, booty, and prizes following their victory against the Midianites.

    Eleazar, the priest, then addressed the troops that had set out for war, saying,

    This is what is required by the Lord’s command that Moses gave you: ‘The gold, silver, bronze, iron, tin, and lead—everything that can withstand fire—must be put through the fire, and then it will be clean. But it must also be purified with the water of cleansing. And whatever cannot withstand fire must be put through that water. On the seventh day, wash your clothes, and you will be clean. Then you may come into the camp.

    Instructing Moses, God said,

    You and Eleazar, the priest, and the family heads of the community are to count all the people and animals that were captured. Divide the spoils equally between the soldiers who took part in the battle and the rest of the community. From the soldiers who fought in the battle, set apart as tribute for the Lord one out of every five hundred, whether people, cattle, donkeys, or sheep. Take this tribute from their half share and give it to Eleazar the priest as the Lord’s part. From the Israelites’ half, select one out of every fifty, whether people, cattle, donkeys, sheep, or other animals. Give them to the Levites, who are responsible for the care of the Lord’s tabernacle.

    Following God’s instructions, Moses and Eleazar, the priest, acted accordingly. Following the troops’ looting, there were 675,000 sheep, 72,000 cattle, 61,000 donkeys, and 32,000 women who had never been sexually active.

    Eleazar’s Death

    After the Israelites reached the land of Canaan, the Lord gave Moses’ successors, Joshua and Eleazar, the priest, the responsibility of dividing up the country as an inheritance for the various Israelite tribes. At the entrance to the Tent of Meeting, Eleazar the priest, Joshua, son of Nun, and the chiefs of the tribal families settled the inheritance for each tribe after Joshua had completed battling for the country of Canaan. The land partition was finalized at this point.

    Eleazar was involved in the casting of lots to determine the allocation of the territories of the Promised Land (Canaan) to each Jewish tribe, ensuring that the allocation was done in accordance with God’s guidance.

    Eleazar, Aaron’s son, passed away, and he was laid to rest among the hills of Ephraim, on a hill that had been granted to his son Phinehas. This spot probably lies in the Samaria neighborhood known as Awarta. The Israeli government restricts Jewish pilgrims to a single night’s stay around the 5th of the Jewish calendar month of Shevat (January–February).

    Families of Priests

    Zadok of Eleazar and Ahimelech of Ithamar were the two priests who helped David establish order among the priesthood. It seems that there were more family heads (chiefs) among Eleazar’s offspring than among Ithamar’s. Therefore, they separated them as follows: 16 family heads for Eleazar’s offspring and 8 family heads for Ithamar’s.

    Since there were “holy leaders” and “leaders appointed by God” among both the descendants of Eleazar and the descendants of Ithamar, they distributed them fairly through random selection. In the presence of the king, the authorities, Zadok the priest, Ahimelech son of Abiathar, and the chiefs of the priestly and Levitical families, the Levite Shemaiah son of Nethaneel entered their names. Eleazar lost one tribe, and then the same happened to Ithamar.

    The rotation order for these 24 groups was determined randomly, and it looked like this:

    1. Jehoiarib; 2. Jedaiah; 3. Harim; 4. Seorim; 5. Malchijah; 6. Miyyamin; 7. Hakkoz; 8. Abijah; 9. Jeshua; 10. Shecaniah; 11. Eliashib; 12. Jakim; 13. Huppah; 14. Jeshbab; 15. Bilhah; 16. Immer; 17. Hezir; 18. Happizzez; 19. Pethahiah; 20. Ezekiel; 21. Jachin; 22. Gamul; 23. Delaiah; 24. Maaziah.

    Genealogy of Eleazar

    Phinehas was Eleazar’s only son with his wife, who was a daughter of Putiel.

    The descendants of Eleazar, in chronological order:

    Phinehas, Abishua, Bukki, Uzzi, Zerahiah, Meraioth, Amariah, Ahitub, Zadok, Ahimaaz, Azariah, Johanan, and Azariah.

    Azariah

    In Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem, Azariah, son of Johanan, worked as a priest.

    From Amariah to Ahitub to Zadok to Shallum to Hilkiah to Azariah to Seraiah to Jehozadak is the family tree of Azariah.

    Seraiah

    When the people of Judah and Jerusalem were carried into exile by Nebuchadnezzar, Jehozadak son of Seraiah was among those who were captured.

    Ezra

    Ezra son of Seraiah son of Azariah son of Hilkiah son of Shallum son of Zadok son of Ahitub son of Meraioth son of Zerahiah son of Uzzi son of Bukki son of Abishua son of Phinehas son of Eleazar son of Aaron, the chief priest, was among the first to return from exile.

    The author of the Book of Ezra, Ezra, came back from exile in Babylon. He was a scribe well-versed in the Ten Commandments that Moses had received from the Lord, Israel’s God. Because the Lord his God was with him, the king granted all his requests.

    Jehozadak

    Jehozadak son of Seraiah, the High Priest, also went into exile in Babylonia; therefore, he may have been a sibling.

    • After the Temple was rebuilt, subsequent High Priests also traced their ancestry back to Eleazar,
      • beginning with Joshua son of Jehozadak (ca. 515–490 BC).
      • Joshua’s son Joiakim, around 470–490 B.C.
      • Joiakim’s son Eliashib, 470–433 B.C.
      • Sometime between 433 and 410 B.C.E., Joiada, son of Eliashib, was expelled from the Temple by Nehemiah because one of his sons had married the daughter of Sanballat the Horonite.
      • Jonathan, son of Joiada, c. 410–371 B.C.E.,
      • Jaddua son of Jonathan, sometime 373–320 BC, during Alexander the Great‘s rule. Some people referred to him as Simeon the Just.

    Phinehas son of Eleazar held the rank of High Priest in the household. However, during the reign of High Priest Eli, it was passed on to the family of Ithamar for reasons that aren’t totally known. According to Samaritan accounts, the descendants of Ithamar and Pinehas son of Eleazar fought among themselves and eventually split into two camps on Mount Gerizim, close to Bethel: those who followed High Priest Eli and those who did not.

    The Ithamar family, descended from Eli the High Priest, held the post of High Priest until Abiathar, the fourth descendant of Eli, was removed from office by King Solomon, who then reinstated Zadok of the Eleazar family. This was the fulfillment of predictions regarding Eli’s family that had been spoken via the prophet Samuel.

    According to the same Samaritan account, the line of High Priests descended from Phinehas was broken with the passing of the 112th High Priest, Shlomyah ben Pinhas, in 1624 AD. As a result, Ithamar’s kin once again assumed the role. Elazar ben Tsedaka ben Yitzhaq served as Samaritan High Priest in 2009.

    Eleazar in Christianity

    The Eastern Orthodox Church celebrates Eleazar on September 2, while the Armenian Apostolic Church honors him as a Holy Father on July 30. However, the Old Testament Bible mentions more than one person with the name Eleazar:

    • It is thought that the Ark of the Covenant was protected by Eleazar son of Abinadab.
    • Eleazar, son of Dodo, was a powerful soldier in King David’s army. His name is sometimes translated as Elhanan.
    • One of those entrusted with the sacred items brought to Jerusalem from Babylonia was Eleazar son of Phinehas.
    • In the genealogy of Jesus Christ contained in the Gospel of Matthew, Eleazar son of Eliud is included. Joseph was Jesus’ adoptive father.
  • Czechoslovak Coup d’état: Communist coup in 1948

    Czechoslovak Coup d’état: Communist coup in 1948

    The Prague coup d’état of February 1948 was an important political event with consequences not only in Czechoslovakia but also internationally. The appointment of Communist police commissioners in Prague led to clashes with Democratic ministers. Democrat ministers eventually resigned, while the Communists fanned the flames of protest. Under pressure from the Czechoslovak Communist Party, the President agreed to form a new government.

    But the elections were undemocratic and the Communists seized power. Thus, an authoritarian regime took over and the Third Republic gave way to a Communist regime.

    Czechoslovakia gained its independence from communist rule during the Velvet Revolution of 1989. This peaceful revolution led to the end of the communist regime and the division of Czechoslovakia into the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993.

    Causes of the Prague Coup

    After World War II, Czechoslovakia was one of the few countries under Soviet occupation with a genuine tradition of democracy. But a coup ended the Third Republic and replaced it with a Communist regime. The Prague coup saw the Czechoslovak Communist Party take control of the country’s institutions. The Democrats resigned, showing their powerlessness in the face of adversity.

    The causes of the Prague coup were manifold. The Soviet Union wanted to strengthen its influence in Central Europe without any interference from the Red Army. The main reason put forward by the Czechoslovak Communist Party was the rejection of the Marshall Plan. After World War II, Czechoslovakia accepted American aid under the Marshall Plan. However, Josef Stalin inflexibly vetoed this decision. This led to a conflict between Czechoslovakia’s democrats and communists. In the end, the government unanimously opposed the Marshall Plan and stopped the country’s opening to the West. The Soviet Union strengthened its control over Czechoslovakia, while America canceled all aid options and made dialogue with the country impossible.

    Events flared up when the Czechoslovak Minister of the Interior promoted eight new police commissioners, all Communists. This appointment led to a wave of resignations among the democratic ministers of the government. But the political crisis would turn in favor of the Communists and the head of state would succumb to their lust for power.

    When Did the Prague Coup Take Place? 

    The Prague coup was triggered on February 17, 1948, when the Minister of the Interior appointed police commissioners. Democrat ministers expressed their disagreement by not attending government meetings on February 18 and 19. Demonstrations and Communist pressure on the Democrats to back down followed. The non-Communist ministers resigned on February 21, 1948. The Prague coup crisis took place between February 17 and 25, 1948.

    Who Was Behind the Prague Coup?

    Edvard Beneš with his wife Hana in 1934
    Edvard Beneš with his wife Hana in 1934.

    The Czechoslovak Communist Party, backed by the Soviet Union, orchestrated the Prague coup. The conflict started when the Minister of the Interior appointed Communist police commissioners. Edvard Beneš, president of Czechoslovakia, saw the unhappiness of the democratic ministers firsthand. Klement Gottwald, the government’s leader, reportedly warned Bene about the possibility of the ministers’ resignations. A political crisis and an actual Communist coup d’état ensued.

    The president found himself confronted with the influence of the Communist Gottwald, who called on citizens to demonstrate en masse and support the Communists in government. Gottwald was helped by Rudolf Slánský, who mobilized the country’s labor militia. The two politicians put strong pressure on the President, who eventually announced that he would resign.

    The coup then took on an almost legal form. Gottwald and Slansky were elected to govern the country in a single-list election. One of those responsible for the crisis was President Beneš, a friend of Stalin. Beneš had misjudged the situation, thinking that early elections would help democracy out of the crisis and the Communists would retreat. But the elections and the Communist takeover proved Beneš wrong.

    How Did the Prague Coup Unfold?

    Communist Party leader Klement Gottwald, who overthrew Beneš for the second time.
    Communist Party leader Klement Gottwald, who overthrew Beneš for the second time. Bundesarchiv, Bild 183-R90009 / CC-BY-SA 3.0.

    On February 17, 1948, the Minister of the Interior appointed Communist police commissioners, setting off the crisis. Ministers who did not support the Communist Party voted against this and demanded that the order be overturned. The Czechoslovak Communist Party mobilized its supporters on February 19 in protest. On February 20 and 21, democratic ministers resigned in protest against Communist coercion. A weakened President Beneš was resting outside the city during these events. Pro-democracy activists were arrested on February 22 after the Minister of the Interior sent police to Prague to restore order.

    On February 25th, after much prodding from Gottwald, Beneš decided to establish a new government, ending the situation. The Communists, who had Soviet support, ultimately won the crisis that the Democratic ministers’ defection caused. President Beneš was helpless in the face of the crisis. He capitulated before the Communists. On May 30, 1948, elections were conducted, and Gottwald was chosen as president. On September 5, 1948, President Beneš passed away. Despite his lifelong commitment to defending Czechoslovakia’s sovereignty, he was ultimately unsuccessful in doing so.

    Foreign Minister Jan Masaryk was discovered dead in his window shortly after the Prague coup. Masaryk was an outspoken opponent of the Communist takeover and a staunch defender of Czechoslovakia’s sovereignty. Without a strong democratic foundation, Czechoslovakia fell under Soviet control. A breaking point was reached in relations with Western nations. For fear of a third global war, the West kept a careful eye on the problem. With the Soviet Union on edge after the Prague coup, the Cold War officially began.

    Why the Prague Coup Was the Beginning of the Cold War

    One of the few democratic and Western-oriented nations in Central Europe after World War II was Czechoslovakia, according to Western nations. The Prague coup worried all sides, who feared the outbreak of a third world war. They were worried about the division of Europe into Western and Russian-influenced countries.

    The Americans perceived Czechoslovakia’s rejection of the Marshall Plan as a real threat. At the same time, the Soviet Union was taking an aggressive stance in Germany, trying to enter West Berlin and establish a land blockade. Eventually, relations between the Soviet Union and Western countries became strained and turned into the Cold War. The nuclear threat was at the center of the Cold War, which lasted until the late 1980s. With the events in Prague in February 1948, the division of Europe became a reality.

    Results of the Prague Coup

    Prague Spring: Czechoslovaks pass their national flag in front of a burning Soviet tank in Prague.
    Prague Spring: Czechoslovaks pass their national flag in front of a burning Soviet tank in Prague.

    After the Central Committee and the Politburo withdrew after the Prague coup, Czechoslovakia’s institutions were rebuilt. The departure of the Democrats from government allowed the Communists to seize control, cornering President Benes. A communist government took power after the collapse of the Third Republic. People’s Republic was the name officially given by the communist administration. Opponents of the new dictatorial rule were arrested and thrown in jail. After the brief period of democracy during the Prague Spring in the 1960s, socialism ruled the nation for the next four decades.

    Confusion and panic spread across Western nations after the Prague coup and the rejection of the Marshall Plan by Czechoslovakia. The rise of Russian strength and influence alarmed Western nations. To confront the Soviet Union’s danger, a global military alliance was established. As a result, the Western allies united under NATO. On April 4, 1949, the treaty that established NATO was signed.

    After the Prague coup, the Cold War began and dominated international political relations. The world entered an unsettling period of division in Europe and conflict between the Americans and the Russians. The Prague coup had a major impact on Czechoslovakia, which was to experience a long period of uncertainty. The effects of this crisis were also felt internationally, with the formation of new alliances and political enemies.

  • Battle of Castillon: The End of the Hundred Years’ War

    Battle of Castillon: The End of the Hundred Years’ War

    The Battle of Castillon, fought on July 17, 1453, marked the conclusion of the Hundred Years’ War (1337–1453) and, more generally, the end of the Middle Ages. Specifically, this victory represented the complete independence of Guyenne (Aquitaine) in southern France from the English for the first time in three centuries. This was King Charles VII‘s fourth military triumph, after the Joan of Arc narrative, the 1429 Battle of Patay in the Pays de la Loire, and the 1450 conquest of Normandy in the Seine Valley.

    In fact, the Valois dynasty (a branch of the Capets) and the Plantagenets fought continuously from 1337 to 1453, and through them, the kingdoms of France and England fought for control of emblematic fiefdoms like Guyenne (now Gironde, Dordogne, Lot-et-Garonne, Lot, and Aveyron). This period is commonly referred to as the Hundred Years’ War.

    The Battle of Castillon was highly significant because it marked the end of the Hundred Years’ War. It resulted in a decisive French victory and the withdrawal of English forces from France, effectively ending English territorial claims in mainland France.

    Causes of the Battle of Castillon

    In 1420, the kingdom of France was on its last legs. By the Treaty of Troyes (1420), King Charles VI had deprived his son Charles of the throne in favor of the English monarch. The first reconquests under Joan of Arc intensified following the coronation of Charles VII as the new King of France in Reims (1429), whetting the Valois appetite once more. Some important castles were recaptured: Orléans, Paris, Champagne, and Normandy.

    What remained was Charles VII’s obsession with Guyenne, then largely under English influence, and in particular with the flourishing wine trade.

    How Was the Battle of Castillon in 1453?

    Jean Bureau
    Jean Bureau.

    By the spring of 1453, negotiations had broken down and conflict in Guyenne was inevitable. King Henry VI appealed to the pro-English Bordeaux and sent 3,000 men under the charismatic army commander John Talbot to reinforce a few thousand soldiers from Guyenne and Gascony. Charles VII sent his best military leaders, notably Dunois and Bureau, to lead 9,000 men, both French and Bretons. Historians explain Castillon’s victory by two closely related factors:

    The French forces were led by Jean Bureau and the British by John Talbot, 1st Earl of Shrewsbury.

    The French set a trap and established their camp above Bordeaux, east of the small village of Castillon, where the British were trapped, besieged, and massacred. This battle also marked a break in military methods; the cavalry’s decline against the infantry and artillery gave the French the upper hand. The French victory was thus complete. Bordeaux was taken in October. Charles VII pardoned the Bordeaux rebels and the English left Guyenne on October 19, 1453.

    The French victory at Castillon was attributed to several factors, including the effective use of artillery by the French, the strategic leadership of Jean Bureau, and the decline of English military resources and support.

    On the French side, the battle left around a hundred men dead or wounded. The English lost 4,000 men, of whom 500 to 600 were killed (2,000 or more according to the Chronique du temps de Charles VII in the Sainte-Geneviève Library in Paris), the others being wounded or taken prisoner during the battle. Among the dead were Talbot, two of his sons and Baron de L’Isle, son of John Talbot, who had landed in Guyenne at the head of 2,000 reinforcements.

    Occurring just a few weeks after the Turks took Constantinople, the battle of Castillon went almost unnoticed by contemporaries.

    How the Battle of Castillon Ended the Hundred Years’ War

    The death of John Talbot depicted in a 19th-century battle painting.
    The death of John Talbot depicted in a 19th-century battle painting.

    The war came to an end in 1453 when the French recaptured the city of Bordeaux, the last major English stronghold in France. This victory marked the end of English territorial claims in France and established France as the dominant power.

    With the exception of Calais, which was not recaptured until five years later, the retaking of Guyenne, one of France’s most emblematic fiefdoms, nicely completed the reconquest that had begun some twenty-five years earlier with the epic story of Joan of Arc. Although this time the English were definitively “expelled from France”, the end of the Hundred Years’ War was not signed until the Treaty of Picquigny in 1475. This long and incessant period of conflict had exhausted the kingdom of France and hindered its development.

    References

    • Cutler, S.H (1981). The Law of Treason and Treason Trials in Later Medieval France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-23968-0.
    • Eggenberger, David (1985). An Encyclopedia of Battles. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-24913-1. Retrieved 7 July 2022.
  • Tauri (Taurians): Ancient Crimean Tribe of the 1st millennium BC

    Tauri (Taurians): Ancient Crimean Tribe of the 1st millennium BC

    The Tauri, or Tauri-Scythians (Latin: Taurus, Tauros), were a tribe who lived in the mountainous and foothill parts of Crimea in the 1st millennium BCE, between the mountains facing the Pontic Sea, between Kerkinitis (Yevpatoria) and Chersonesus (Bosporan Kingdom). The Tauri were initially mentioned in the sixth century BCE and were not mentioned again until the first century CE. Herodotus claims that the people of the Taurians were fierce warriors because they domesticated bulls during the Neolithic period (7000–3000 BCE) in the territory of ethnic Ukraine. The Greeks called these people “Ταῦροι” and the Latins called them “Tauros,” and both names are derived from the ancient symbol of a bull. This concept remained until 64 BCE–23 CE, as described by Strabo.

    Their Early History

    In his account of the sinking of a Roman fleet carrying the prefect and a cohort in 49 CE, the Roman historian Tacitus made reference to the territory of the Tauri. This ancient tribe is also the name of the Taurus constellation since the tribe has deep historical roots in the Crimean Peninsula and the surrounding regions. Tauri were originally Cimmerians who helped establish the Greek colony of Kimmerikon (located about 30 miles south of Kerch in Crimea) as a southern outpost of the Bosporan Kingdom.

    After the Scythians conquered the Crimean Peninsula and assimilated the Tauri, the combined people became known as the “Tauri-Scythians,” and the region was renamed the old Taurica (also the Roman name of the Crimean Peninsula). The Tauri were profoundly impacted by Greek civilization and ultimately accepted its culture and religion. According to Herodotus, Thoas, who reigned approximately 1250 BCE, was the first king of the Tauri.

    In Greek mythology, Thoas was the son of Borysthenes, the God of the Dnipro River.

    Taurians continued to pose a significant military danger in the area, engaging in Black Sea piracy and launching attacks from their stronghold of Balaklava even after the Greeks and Romans had conquered the coast. Also, back in the second century BCE, like the Greeks, the Taurians were a subordinate and ally of the Scythian monarch Skilurus, with whom they shared ownership of the Crimean steppes, the lower Dnieper, and the Southern Bug River.

    Their Origin

    1. Several theories attempt to explain the origins of the Tauri. Some suggest a connection to the Thracians, tracing their lineage to the Taurisci, who in turn are associated with the Tivertsi, an early Slavic ethnic group.
    2. Another theory proposes the Tauri’s descent from specific Cimmerian groups, considering them local aborigines.
    3. There’s also speculation about the remnants of Indo-Aryan settlements in Crimea.
    4. Alternatively, it’s conceivable that these people were carriers of the Bronze Age Koban culture from the North Caucasus who migrated to Crimea and influenced the timber-grave culture, suggesting a possible Caucasian ancestry for the Tauri.

    However, it is more likely that the Taurisci were a subgroup of the Tauri (later Tivertsi) because, according to Pliny the Elder, the Taurisci (Noricis) migrated from Gaul to “Norian” (modern Eastern Bavaria, the northern part of the province of Salzburg, Austria) around 350 BCE.

    The Dacian tribe Taurisci (Noricis) moved west of the Carpathians between 218 and 201 BCE, settling in the area of the Dniester, Bug, and Prut rivers in the Black Sea basin; they were later labeled as a subgroup of the Tauroscythians.

    Ammianus Marcellinus, writing in the fourth century CE, identified the Arihi, Napei, and Sindi as members of this formidable Tauri tribe.

    References to Tauri (Taurians) in History

    Tauri (Taurians)

    Herodotus’ The Histories, Book 4, provides the first record of the Tauri. As a people, they didn’t want to help the Scythians battle Darius.

    After the Scythians had made this speech, the kings who had come from the nations deliberated, and their opinions were divided. The kings of the Geloni and the Budini and the Sauromatae were of one mind and promised to help the Scythians; but the kings of the Agathyrsi and Neuri and Maneaters and Black-cloaks and Tauri gave this answer to the messengers: “Had it not been you who wronged the Persians first and began the war, what you now ask would seem to us right, and we would listen and act together with you. But as it is, you invaded their land without us and ruled the Persians for as long as god granted; and the Persians, urged on by the same god, are only repaying you in kind. But we did these men no wrong at that former time, nor do we intend now to wrong them first; but if the Persian comes against our land too and begins the wrong-doing, then we will not accept it, either; but until we see that, we shall keep to ourselves. For in our judgment the Persians have not come for us but for those who were the agents of wrong.

    Herodotus, The Histories, Book 4, chapter 119, section 1 (tufts.edu)

    Herodotus states that the Tauri lived in the mountains between Kerkinitis and Chersonesus, which is roughly the area between Yevpatoria and the Kerch Peninsula. He goes into detail on the savage rituals practiced by this group, including the sacrifice of shipwrecked sailors and any Greeks they catch at sea to the goddess Parthenos (Virgin), a local god identified by the Greeks with Artemis. According to Herodotus, the only things the Tauri did were fight and steal from other people.

    Among these, the Tauri have the following customs: all ship-wrecked men, and any Greeks whom they capture in their sea-raids, they sacrifice to the Virgin goddess as I will describe: after the first rites of sacrifice, they strike the victim on the head with a club; according to some, they then place the head on a pole and throw the body off the cliff on which their temple stands; others agree as to the head, but say that the body is buried, not thrown off the cliff. The Tauri themselves say that this deity to whom they sacrifice is Agamemnon’s daughter Iphigenia. As for enemies whom they defeat, each cuts his enemy’s head off and carries it away to his house, where he places it on a tall pole and stands it high above the dwelling, above the smoke-vent for the most part. These heads, they say, are set up to guard the whole house. The Tauri live by plundering and war.

    Herodotus, The Histories, Book 4, chapter 103, section 3 (tufts.edu)

    Herodotus and several archaeological digs point to the Tauri’s primary economic activities being cattle raising, farming in river valleys, and fishing in coastal waters. Although culturally inferior (living in the Bronze Age when their neighbors had already developed iron tools), the Tauri still constructed and fortified towns, which they used to effectively fend off attackers, including the Romans, for a considerable period of time.

    The Tauri-Scythians are a historical group of people that resulted from the intermarriage of Tauri and Scythians when the southern Scythians, their neighbors, were driven into the Crimean Mountains by the Sarmatians. The Tauri gave their name to the Crimean Peninsula, which was also known as the Taurica to the Tauri.

    The Language Tauri (Taurians) Talked

    Between the 9th and 7th centuries BCE, the proto-state between Taurida (or Taurica) and Sindica (modern Taman) was known in ancient texts as the Cimmerian Bosporus, and its inhabitants (the Cimmerians) spoke the Iranian language. After the 7th century BCE, a sizable minority remained in Taurida and, with the help of the Scythian language, which is based on the Iranian language, merged with the Scythians, taking on the name “Tauri-Scythians.”

    Thracians and Celtic tribes, the Gauls, pressured the Scythians from the west, resulting in the demise of the Tauri-Scythian economy in the late 4th century BCE, when the Scythians were beaten by the king of Thrace, Lysimachus. The Tauri-Scythians, along with some of their country and people, were colonized by the Celts and the Thracians.

    The Scythian coalition of tribes, Scythia, became a part of Sarmatia when the Iranian-speaking Sarmatians invaded from the east into the Northern Black Sea area in the 2nd and 1st centuries BCE. Later linguistic research verified the existence of Iranian-derived vocabulary and the contribution of Scythians and Sarmatians to Ukrainian ethnogenesis.

    On the northern shore of the Black Sea, in the 7th century BCE, there were Greek colonies inhabited by Greek speakers. The spread of commerce between the regions beginning in the fourth century BCE and continuing until the second century CE brought speakers of the Semitic language into contact.

    The Taurisci tribe (Noricians) spoke a Slavic language and crossed the Carpathian Mountains in 218–201 BCE to settle in the Black Sea basin around the Dniester, Southern Bug (see “Buzhans”), and Prut rivers.

    Around 60 BCE, people of the Slavic language Taurisci migrated across Eastern Europe’s Tisza River valley and the Black Sea basin with their Celtic allies, the Boii tribe.

    The “Tauric language” was referred to as Gothic by the ancient geographer writing in the 5th century CE (Pseudo-Arian, “Periplus of the Euxine Sea”). Hutsuls (an East Slavic ethnic group) is the Romanian term for “Goth.”

    Thus, occurrences clearly tied to actual life in Taurica (Taurida) during different times involving different tribes were documented in diverse sources from many countries in various historical eras. A broader group of Slavic tribes with remnants of Goths, Greeks, and Iranians was probably there; thus, the ethnogenesis in this area can be seen as the assimilation of tribes and the objective development of the Antes (a Slavic tribal union).

    Archaeology

    The Tauri are similar to the ancient Kizil-Koba people (from 9th–8th millennia BC) when they reached a specific point in their history. Gravestones found in the city of Chersonesus state that the deceased people were killed by Tauri, while in some tombs found within the Bosporan Kingdom, it was inscribed that the deceased themselves were Tauri.

    The Tauri who lived in the area around Chersonesus were conquered by the Ancient Greek General Diophantus, according to a proclamation written in his honor that was discovered in Chersonesus during the time of King Mithridates VI and dated back to the second century BCE. According to a string of inscriptions from the early 1st century BCE, Bosporan King Aspurgus conquered and enslaved several neighboring peoples, including the Tauri.

    As early as the 5th century BCE, the Tauri had already joined the city-states of Greek colonies in the Northern Black Sea area, centuries before they assimilated with the Scythians (becoming the “Tauri-Scythians”).

    Tauri-Scythians in Roman Times

    “Tauri-Scythians” is an ethnonym used in Roman times to identify the inhabitants inhabiting the interior parts of Crimea. Similarly, the name “Scytho-Tauri” was used, but considerably less often, and was most likely identical with “Tauri-Scythians” anyway. After the late Scythian state was formed in the 2nd century BCE, these new ethnonyms emerged to represent ethnic processes taking place in Crimea at the time. The Tauri were initially recorded by the Greek historian Strabo, who classified them as a “Scythian tribe.”

    The Tauri clearly formed a part of the late Scythian towns in the years before and after the common era. Over time, the assimilation processes that resulted in the ethnonym “Tauri-Scythians” emerged. Those in conflict with their neighbors, such as the Bosporan monarchs and the Romans from Chersonesus Taurica, were able to tell the Tauri apart from the Scythians because of this.

    After the Tauri were fully integrated into Bosporan society in the third century CE, they are mentioned in just one inscription. First-century CE authors who weren’t from Crimea (including Pliny the Elder, Plutarch, Arrian, Claudius Ptolemy, and others) said that the Tauri had vanished, leaving behind just the letter “T” to refer to them.

    The Tauri, sometimes known as the Scytho-Tauri, are only vaguely localized in two different texts. Pliny the Elder states that they settled in the Crimean Mountains. When Roman Emperor Antoninus Pius (reign 138–161 CE) was in power, Olbia was invaded by the Tauri. Olbia’s residents turned to the emperor for aid. Together with the Olbians, the Romans were able to crush the barbarians. The Tauri exchanged some prisoners in order to get away with the lost.

    Some medieval literature (such as Procopius’ “Life of John the Cappadocian”) refers to the people of Crimea as “Tauri-Scythians.” The ethnonym’s original historical significance had been lost, however, since the word had by then become a literary one. The term “Tauri-Scythians” was used interchangeably with “Rus’” (the Rus’ people) by Leo the Deacon and other Byzantine writers, including Michael Psellos, Anna Komnene, and Niketas Choniates.

    Where Did Tauri (Taurians) Lay Their Dead?

    Tauri (Taurians) burial box in the Tash-Koy, Baydar Valley.
    Tauri (Taurians) burial box in the Tash-Koy, Baydar Valley. (Ruslan Stoychev, cc by sa 3.0, cropped)

    For Tauri (Taurians) people, their dead were put in stone boxes at the burial places, often in fetal posture. The stone boxes were utilized as graves for a considerable amount of time. Only the skulls were left after the bones were taken from the graves. The Tauri or Taurian graves from earlier periods featured pots. It was common practice to place many bodies in one grave. From the mid-7th century BCE, a complex decoration coupled with relief became widespread. Mounds were occasionally built above stone containers. The majority of the artifacts recovered at these sites were made of bronze and included jewelry, bracelets, pendants, weapons, and other accessories.

  • Tartaria Maps: Navigating Through the Lands of Tartaria

    Tartaria Maps: Navigating Through the Lands of Tartaria

    The Tartaria maps refer to ‘historical’ maps depicting the region of Tartaria in northern Asia. These maps offer insights into the alleged geography, landscape, and culture of the Tartaria region that supposedly existed in ‘hidden history’. This huge territory between the Caspian Sea and the Pacific Ocean, including the present-day boundaries of China and India, is referred to as Tartaria in Western European literature and cartography. From the 13th through the 19th centuries, the toponym was in regular usage.

    In many derogatory titles that had little to do with the actual inhabitants of the area, Tartaria became the most popular term for Central Asia and Siberia in European sources. European knowledge of the area was exceedingly limited, discontinuous, and partly mythological until the 19th century. The region historically known as Tartaria is now often referred to as Inner or Central Eurasia. The majority of the people in these areas have spent centuries raising cattle, despite the dry climate.

    1575 Tartaria Map

    A 1575 Tartaria Map First published in 1570.
    First published in 1570.

    View this map in higher resolution. [1.6 MB]

    A descriptive map of Russia and Tartaria by the explorer Anthony Jenkinson (1562). This is a scan of the map from the 1575 edition of Ortelius’ Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, first published in 1570 and republished many times between 1571 and 1641.

    Tartaria by Jodocus Hondius, 1606

    A Tartaria map created by Jodocus Hondius (1563–1612).
    A Tartaria map created by Jodocus Hondius (1563–1612).

    View this map in higher resolution. [1.6 MB]

    A Tartaria map created by the Flemish and Dutch engraver and cartographer Jodocus Hondius (1563–1612). The map is from circa 1606. It depicts places like Tartaria, Central Asia, Asiatic Russia, the Great Wall of China, and the early Northwest Coast of America.

    The island of Corea, Cape de Fortuna, and the Straits of Anian are noteworthy landmarks. The map covers the Black Sea and Russia in addition to showcasing specifics about Nova Zembla. Livestock, tents, and scenes depicting nomadic tribes are examples of decorative components.

    Asiae Nova Descriptio, 1567–1570

    A Tartaria map from 1567-1570: Asiae Nova Descriptio (A New Description of Asia).
    A Tartaria map from 1567-1570: Asiae Nova Descriptio (A New Description of Asia).

    View this map in higher resolution. [1 MB]

    A Tartaria map from 1567–1570. Abraham Ortelius, Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, English publication as The Theatre of the Whole World, London 1606; this map is a reduction of Ortelius’ 8-sheet map of Asia from 1567, which was primarily taken from Giacomo Gastaldi’s wall-map of Asia from 1559–161.

    Tartaria and the Greater Part of the Kingdom of China, 1680

    Tartaria and the Greater Part of the Kingdom of China 1680 2

    View this map in higher resolution. [11 MB]

    This map of Tartaria is from the special collection of the University of Amsterdam. This map was published by Frederik de Wit (1629–1706). He was a Dutch cartographer and artist. The map shows Oceanus Occidentalis (Atlantic Ocean) and Mare Tartaricum (Arctic Ocean).

    1667 Atlas Maior

    A Tartaria map published in Joan Blaeu's 1667 Atlas Maior.
    A Tartaria map published in Joan Blaeu’s 1667 Atlas Maior.

    View this map in higher resolution. [3 MB]

    The large middle area, surrounded by yellow borders, reads “TARTARIA.” This is a Tartaria map from the 1667 printing of the Tenth of Blaeu’s series of twelve atlases. The book is titled “Le Grand Atlas, ou Cosmographie Blaviane,” in which the Earth, the Sea, and the Heavens are described.

    18th-Century Tartaria Map

    18th-Century Tartaria Map, "Grand Russie."
    18th-Century Tartaria Map, “Grand Russie.”

    View this map in higher resolution. [5 MB]

    The large pink area at the right reads “TARTARIA.” It was a brand-new map depicting the whole of the Russian Empire as it was at the time of Peter the Great’s passing. The maps read, “In the immortal memory of this great monarch.”

    Russia in Asia and Tartaria, 1853

    Russia in Asia and Tartary, 1853.
    Russia in Asia and Tartary, 1853.

    View this map in higher resolution. [4 MB]

    An example of S. A. Mitchell Sr.’s map of Russia in Asia and Tartaria from 1853. Beginning in the Ural Mountains and ending at the Caspian Sea, it stretches all the way to Siberia, Kamtschatka, and Japan in the east. Includes most of northern China as well as parts of Mongolia and Korea farther to the south.

    Map of Great Tartaria and China, 17th Century

    Map of Great Tartaria, 17th century.
    Map of Great Tartaria, 17th century.

    View this map in higher resolution. [4 MB]

    A map of the Great Tartary and China, together with the neighboring parts of Asia, adapted from Mr. De Fer’s map of Asia. This work is dedicated to Prince William, Duke of Gloucester.

    A Tartaria Map of 1626

    A 1626 Tartaria Map by John Speed.
    A 1626 Tartaria Map by John Speed.

    View this map in higher resolution. [4 MB]

    An old map of Tartaria shows northern China, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia, as well as southern Russia and eastern China. The first English-made global atlas has this map, Speed’s map of Tartaria. There is a distinct depiction of the Great Wall of China, and the map’s interior is extensively marked.

    Map of Tartaria by Bertius, 16th–17th centuries

    the 16th or 17th century Tartaria map by bertius
    A 16th or 17th century Tartaria map.

    View this map in higher resolution. [2.5 MB]

    The map of Tartaria by the geographer and cartographer Petrus Bertius (1565–1629). Bertius is best known as a mapper for his version of the Geographia of Ptolemy. In this 16th or 17th century Tartaria map, China is represented with “Chi” at the right and Parthia is shown at the bottom left next to the Caspian Sea, which reads Mar de Sala.

    1706 Tartaria Map

    The Map of Tartaria, 1706.
    The Map of Tartaria, 1706.

    View this map in higher resolution. [5.2 MB]

    Originally called “Carte de Tartarie” (Tartaria Map), it was created by the cartographer Guillaume Delisle (1675–1726) in 1706. The description on the bottom left side explains that this Tartaria map was drawn on the relationships of several travelers from different nations and on some observations made in French by Guillaume Delisle of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Paris.

    Tartaria Map of the Kingdom of the Great Khan, 16th Century

    A Tartaria map for Genghis Khan.
    A Tartaria map for Genghis Khan.

    View this map in higher resolution. [2.3 MB]

    An ancient Tartaria map drawn out by the great Brabantian mapper, geographer, and cosmographer Abraham Ortelius (1527–1598). The map shows the “Kingdom of the Great Khan,” which is likely Genghis Khan.

    See also: Genghis Khan’s Children: His Number of Sons and Daughters

    Grand Tartaria Map, 1674–1719

    Grand Tartaria Map, 1674--1719
    Grand Tartaria by Guillaume Sanson.

    View this map in higher resolution. [9.5 MB]

    The map of Grand Tartaria by the French cartographer Guillaume Sanson (1633–1703) at the French National Library. This map above is probably a copy from 1674–1719.

    1719 Tartaria Map

    1719 Tartaria Map
    This map of Asia and Tartaria (top) includes all of the East Indies, Japan, and India.

    View this map in higher resolution. [9 MB]

    This map of Asia and Tartaria (top) includes all of the East Indies, Japan, and India. It is drawn from H.A. Chatelain’s Atlas historique or nouvelle introduction à la chronologie (Historical Atlas or New Introduction to Ancient & Modern History, Chronology & Geography), 1719. He was a Huguenot pastor of Parisian origins.

    3rd Map of Chinese Tartaria, 1737

    3rd Map of Chinese Tartaria, 1737
    From the New Atlas of China, Chinese Tartary, and Tibet, 1737.

    View this map in higher resolution. [2.4 MB]

    Third Map of Chinese Tartary or Tartaria, from the New Atlas of China, Chinese Tartary, and Tibet, 1737. It includes the regions occupied by the Mongols north of the Great Wall and the lands of Ordos, encircled by the Yellow River.

    Tatariae Sinensis, 1749

    Cropped section of the Tatariae Sinensis map.
    Cropped section of the Tatariae Sinensis map.

    View this map in higher resolution. [12.7 MB]

    Japan, Korea, Inner Mongolia, the Kingdom of Manchuria, and the Province of Great Tartary, North China, are depicted on a single Tartaria map named Tatariae Sinensis from 1749. Jean-Baptiste Bourguignon d’Anville (1697–1782), was a notable cartographer. Johann Tobias Mayer (1723-1762; elder), was also a renowned cartographer. Their works are housed in the National Library of France.

    Independent Tartaria Map, 1851

    Independent Tartaria Map, 1851
    Independent Tartary by John Tallis.

    View this map in higher resolution. [6.8 MB]

    Independent Tartaria map from 1851 with short stories about the Bride Chase, the Tartars traveling, and the Tent during those times. Engraved for the Illustrated Atlas of R. Montgomery Martin. Among the last great creators of colorful maps was the British John Tallis (1817–1876).

  • Ilse Einstein: Einstein Liked to Marry His Fiancé’s Daughter

    Ilse Einstein: Einstein Liked to Marry His Fiancé’s Daughter

    • Einstein contemplated marrying his future stepdaughter, Ilse, in 1918.
    • Ilse Einstein considered Albert more of a father figure.
    • Einstein later saw Ilse and Margot as his own daughters.

    Although Albert Einstein spent the years 1914–1918 working tirelessly on his groundbreaking theory of relativity, his personal life was becoming more complex. Einstein’s thinking of marrying his cousin-wife Elsa‘s daughter Ilse in 1918 is interesting on its own. Ilse Einstein (1897–1934) was the daughter of Elsa and her previous husband, Max Löwenthal. In 1919, she became the stepdaughter of Albert Einstein, then a nationally renowned figure.

    Background to the Story

    Elsa married the Berlin textile merchant Max Loewenthal (1864–1914) in 1896. Ilse (1897–1934) and Margot (1899–1986) were born and raised in Hechingen. Max Loewenthal moved to Berlin for professional reasons in 1902. Their home was in Hechingen. In 1903, they had a son, but he passed away shortly after birth. Elsa moved to Berlin’s Haberlandstrasse 5 with her two daughters after her marriage ended in 1908. Around 1912, she and Albert Einstein, childhood cousins, began dating in Berlin.

    Ilse Einstein's mother Elsa Einstein and Albert Einstein
    Ilse’s mother Elsa, and Albert Einstein.

    When Einstein confessed his feelings for Ilse, his fiancée’s daughter, in the spring of 1918, the twenty-year-old lady was thrown into a state of confusion. She sent a personal letter to her family’s friend, Georg Nicolai, explaining her predicament and asking for guidance.

    “I have never felt the desire or the slightest desire to be physically close to him.”

    Ilse confessed to Nicolai in May 1918.

    Einstein’s Complex Relationships

    At the age of 38, Einstein had relocated to Berlin in 1919 and divorced Mileva in preparation for his upcoming marriage to his cousin Elsa. Einstein’s assistant at the time was Ilse, Elsa’s oldest daughter, and Albert was already engaged to Elsa.

    After a playful remark turned into a serious proposal from Einstein to marry his secretary and future stepdaughter Ilse, instead of her mother, Ilse wrote to her close friend Georg Nicolai for advice, with a note “destroy after reading.” Nicolai had been her ex-lover.

    Picture shows Ilse Einstein, the stepdaughter of Albert Einstein, sailing. She went on a boat trip with her husband, her mother, and her stepfather.
    Picture shows Ilse Einstein sailing. She went on a boat trip with her husband, her mother, and her stepfather Einstein. (Image: Leo Baeck Institute, F 38590)

    Einstein told Ilse that he loved her, but she didn’t openly return her sentiments (or it was never documented). It was because of this that Einstein was thinking of ending his engagement to his cousin Elsa right away.

    However, it appears that she loved Einstein as a father figure, and she had no interest in having a sexual relationship with him. Fortunately for Albert, there is no indication that their relationship has progressed any further. Months later, Einstein married Elsa, and Ilse later married Rudolf Kayser in 1924.

    Ilse Einstein died of tuberculosis either in 1933 or 1934. Only two years later, Rudolf married Eva Urgiss. Rudolf also wrote a biography of Albert.

    Ilse’s Conflicted Emotions

    While Ilse held Einstein in a place of near-paternal regard, she did not want to develop romantic feelings for him since she considered herself too young for such a relationship. Albert was 18 years older than Ilse, and Ilse was 20 or 21 years old at the time. However, such an age difference in marriage was not uncommon at the time, and Ilse’s ex-lover, Georg Nicolai, was also older than her.

    From the letters sent by Ilse, her mother Elsa was also willing to give up her position of marriage to Einstein if it would make Ilse happy.

    Einstein’s Marital Dynamics

    einsteins house in berlin
    Albert Einstein’s house in Berlin, Caputh. (Photo, Stephan M. Höhne, CC BY-SA 3.0)

    Beyond his scientific genius, Einstein was a complex man who had complicated relationships with various women. This can be understood in various ways; his daughter Lieserl Einstein was kept hidden from the public for 85 years, and Evelyn Einstein was possibly Albert’s out-of-wedlock daughter from an alleged New York ballet.

    The Einsteins created a loving family unit with their stepdaughters, Ilse and Margot. Albert raised Ilse and Margot as his own, despite the fact that he and Elsa never had any biological children. They were Berliners who bought a vacation home in Caputh, a suburb of Potsdam, in 1929. During that time, Ilse appears to continue to work as Einstein’s secretary.

    However, the vacation house’s architect, Konrad Wachsmann, later reported that there were also recurring scenes of jealousy involving Elsa, where she even mentioned a separation from Albert. But Elsa eventually came to terms with her husband’s behavior. She later explained her predicament:

    “It’s not ideal to be the wife of a genius. Your life is not yours to control. It appears to be shared property.”

    Elsa was by Einstein’s side until the day she passed away in 1936.

  • Fiji Mermaid: The Story of a 19th-Century Sea Monster

    Fiji Mermaid: The Story of a 19th-Century Sea Monster

    • The Fiji mermaid, a famous sideshow attraction, gained popularity in the 19th century.
    • It was a fabricated creature, combining the upper body of a monkey with the lower body of a fish.
    • Its legacy thrives in books, films, and music.

    The Fiji mermaid, or Feejee mermaid, is a legendary sea monster with its roots in the South Pacific nation of Fiji. It was initially made available to the general public in 1842 in New York, United States. In the 19th century, the Fiji mermaid rose to prominence when a specimen was put on display as a “mystical marvel” for the benefit of interested visitors. Because of its fishy bottom half and monkey-like upper half, the Fiji mermaid is also known as the Monkey Fish. Until modern times, many people had different opinions on whether or not the Fiji Mermaid really existed.

    Mermaids in Folklore

    A Fiji Mermaid brochure: An advert for P.T. Barnum's "Feejee Mermaid" in 1842.
    An advert for P.T. Barnum’s “Feejee Mermaid” in 1842.

    The stories of mermaids have been told for thousands of years. Even today, those who go out into the ocean keep their eyes peeled for this legendary beast. Dugongs are believed to be the inspiration for mermaids. Dugong skeletons were frequently showcased as “mermaid skeletons” in Renaissance and Baroque-era cabinets of curiosities in public, the forerunners of modern museums.

    Many of the displays included fabricated dugongs or children with sirenomelia (“mermaid syndrome”), a rare genetic disorder. The popularity of the “Fiji mermaids” notion may be attributed to the efforts of Phineas Taylor Barnum, whose display has been replicated several times by various hoaxers, notably in the collection of the renowned Robert Ripley.

    What Was a Fiji Mermaid?

    Fiji Mermaid
    (Wellcome Collection, cc by 4.0)

    Until the 17th century, people believed in a world where mysterious creatures lived in the sea. While mermaids were once thought to be real, they were now recognized as mythical. Nevertheless, reports of living or dead mermaids persisted even in the 19th century. The Fiji mermaid, popularized by P.T. Barnum, was a notable example that inspired many imitations.

    The discovery of the Fiji mermaid in 1840 brought it to widespread attention. The Fiji mermaid looked nothing like the lovely sea creatures represented in stories; instead, she had a monkey’s upper body and a fish’s tail. The 1840 specimen was just 20.7 inches in length, 8.3 inches in height, and 8.3 inches in breadth, yet it had an uncanny face and a peculiar look. The top 60 percent of this specimen was made up of a small monkey, while the bottom 40 percent was made up of a fish.

    Fiji mermaid, or Feejee mermaid. Colored lithograph by E. Purcell, 1822.
    Fiji mermaid, or Feejee mermaid. Colored lithograph by E. Purcell, 1822.

    In 1842, Phineas Taylor Barnum brought the first Fiji mermaid to New York City to display at his museum. Many people who came to the museum were interested in this enigmatic and terrifying beast. The museum’s revenue greatly exceeded the previous month, with sales of $12,341 compared to $1,272.

    Several additional mermaids from Fiji were shown in museums around the United States in the years that followed. The existence of mermaids gained credibility as the Fiji mermaid was showcased in Barnum’s exhibition for years. Although various Fiji mermaid replicas surfaced at Barnum’s exhibit in the early 1860s, the original specimen was lost forever after a devastating fire.

    Fiji mermaid, or Feejee mermaid

    At this time, the Fiji Mermaid was a catchall term for several touring displays of oddities and street performances. The inclusion of “Fiji” in the name was a nod to P. T. Barnum, who propagated the story that these animals had been discovered off the coast of Fiji, an island country that was mostly unknown to the general populace of the United States and Europe in the middle of the 19th century.

    When Barnum’s Museum was burned down in 1865, it took with it the original duplicate that had toured the United States. An alleged second (or original) copy was purchased by Harvard University’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology and is kept in the museum’s attic.

    A Fiji Mermaid replica in the Barnum Museum.
    A replica in the Barnum Museum. (James Spurrier, cc by-sa 2.0, enhanced)

    History of the Fiji Mermaid

    The legend of the Fiji mermaid in the United States originated in mid-July of 1842, when a British man called J. Griffin arrived in New York City. Griffin said that the mermaid he was carrying was 100% real, saying that a Japanese fisherman had captured her near the Fiji Islands in the South Pacific. Journalists heard about J. Griffin and the strange creature and rushed to the hotel where she was staying to see the mermaid as soon as the rumor spread.

    Griffin’s portrayal of the Fiji mermaid fooled the reporters into thinking the creature indeed existed. In an effort to convince Griffin to display the Fiji mermaid in his museum, P.T. Barnum paid a visit to the editorial offices of major New York newspapers.

    A Sensational Specimen

    Fiji Mermaid, Boston Museum, 1857.
    Boston Museum, 1857.

    After then, newspapers began publishing mermaid woodcuts as well. With Barnum’s help, Griffin’s Fiji mermaid became the talk of the town as he handed out ten thousand brochures in New York depicting the creature.

    Griffin eventually consented to having the Fiji mermaid shown in New York’s Concert Hall on Broadway. Visitors flocked to see the display for the whole week. Griffin then planned a month-long show at Barnum’s American Museum in New York City. Griffin not only displayed artifacts related to the Fiji mermaid but also offered talks to the public. Griffin’s creation was not appealing in the least to the curious onlookers, who saw an atrocity of a monkey and fish combined in a dried body instead of a beautiful, topless sea-lady as advertised.

    The mysterious mermaid became a sensation.

    The Fiji mermaid was originally mentioned in the British tabloid The Mirror. In 1842, Moses Kimball, the manager of the Boston Museum in the United States, purchased the mermaid from the son of Captain Edes, who had inherited the mermaid after his father’s death. Kimball then presented the Fiji mermaid to P.T. Barnum in New York City.

    Barnum and Kimball had the mermaid examined by a naturalist before bringing her to the public. The naturalist looked at the mermaid’s teeth and fins and still didn’t believe in the existence of the creature. Barnum still leased the monster from Kimball for $12.50 a week because he thought it would bring a lot of people to his exhibit.

    A Weather Report in Disguise

    Fiji Mermaid by barnum

    Barnum then proceeded to send a series of anonymous letters to prominent New York newspapers in which he made weather-related observations and also referenced a mermaid owned by a British man signed “J. Griffin.” Griffin then made a hotel reservation in Philadelphia. He eventually let the hotel owner see the Fiji mermaid after being there for a few days.

    The public’s interest in the Fiji mermaid kept growing from there. The plan called for Griffin to go to New York and display the mermaid at Concert Hall as expected. The Fiji mermaid went on a cross-country tour after her debut at Barnum’s American Museum. After making its way to London in 1859, the Fiji mermaid made her way back to the United States and was shown at Kimball’s Boston Museum.

    Origin of This Whole Hoax

    fiji mermaid
    Takeshi Yamada holding his Fiji mermaid at the Carnivorous Nights taxidermy contest at Union Hall in Brooklyn. (Istolethetv, cc by-sa 2.0)

    Scientists of the time were baffled by the occurrence of the mermaid since they couldn’t make sense of the event. Many started to hypothesize that, just as humans descended from apes, so did the inhabitants of the ocean. Changes in the environment and the topography of the Earth had caused the extinction of the fish people, of whom Fiji was allegedly the progenitor.

    However, not everyone fell for this hoax. After all, it appeared that two animals were skillfully sewn together and later covered in papier-mache to produce this fake animal and cash in on people’s curiosity. According to some theories, it was the Japanese fishermen who were responsible for creating the Fiji mermaid using their centuries-old artistic techniques.

    The Plot

    Dr. Griffin (actual name: Levi Lyman) was a trusted subordinate of Barnum’s. The “mermaid” was supposedly bought by American captain Samuel Barrett Edes from Japanese seamen in 1822 for $6,000. This same year, according to Edes, this beast was on display in London, England. The fire at Barnum’s exhibit in 1865 is blamed for the loss of the Fiji mermaid. The Fiji mermaid may have also made it, and some people actually think it ended up at Harvard’s Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. It is unclear, however, whether or not the mermaid on display in this museum is the authentic Fiji mermaid from Barnum and Bailey.

    Not Made of a Monkey

    A Fiji Mermaid display in Hot Springs, Arkansas.
    A specimen display in Hot Springs, Arkansas. (Dbhewitt63, cc by-sa 3.0, restored).

    By the end of 2011, a research team had determined that the Fiji mermaid was indeed a fraud but not a monkey. The scientists employed modern equipment to do painstaking structural analyses of these monkey-fishes. The monkey-fish mummy on display at London’s Horniman Museum was shown to be composed of paper, leaves, iron wire, clay, fish bones, and chicken feet thanks to X-ray technology.

    Nothing that may have come from a monkey was found. The Fiji mermaid was originally designed as a fortunate charm for fishermen on lengthy sea trips, but due to its surprising popularity, many people began to believe in the reality of mermaids.

    Where Is It Today?

    fiji mermaid: A specimen from the 19th century, donated to the Civic Museum of Modena.
    A specimen from the 19th century, donated to the Civic Museum of Modena. (Renaud Bernadet, cc by-sa 3.0, cropped)

    Even today, there remains debate regarding whether or not the Fiji mermaid perished in the fire at Barnum’s American Museum in 1865. Despite many claims to possession of the genuine specimen, the Peabody Museum at Harvard University has the strongest case. It’s not an exact duplicate, but it has the same bare teeth and flat nose. Since the mermaid no longer looks precisely like it did when it was in Barnum’s hands, experts believe that the fire was to blame.

    fiji mermaid 15
    A specimen from the 19th century, donated to the Civic Museum of Modena. (Renaud Bernadet, cc by-sa 3.0, cropped)

    Fiji Mermaid in Popular Culture

    • The Fiji Mermaid is depicted on the cover and is referenced in the song “Megalodon” from Mastodon’s second album, Leviathan.
    • The episode “Humbug” of the 1990s TV show The X-Files speculates that a Fiji mermaid may have been responsible for a string of killings.
    • In the episode “The Secret Serum” from 2010’s Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated, Fiji Mermaid is shown as an exhibit in Darrow University Museum of Oddities.
    • At the film’s conclusion in 2019, the mermaid Fiji makes an appearance in Missing Link.
    • The Mermaid, published in 2018, is the story of P. T. Barnum and the mermaid of Fiji, by Christina Henry.
    • The mockumentary Mermaids: The New Evidence is a sequel to the 2003 film Mermaids: The Body Found which focuses on the mermaids of Fiji.
    • MewithoutYou, an indie rock band, released the song “Fiji Mermaid” in 2012 on their fifth studio album, titled Ten Stories.
    • Rainn Wilson’s character, Bill Hudley, is murdered in Rob Zombie’s House of 1000 Corpses, and his body is transformed into a Fiji mermaid using the art of taxidermy.
    • Puss in Boots’s episode “Mermaid” features the rescue of a mermaid called Fiji, who has a horrible appearance and dangerous fangs.
    • First seen in the episode “Tourist Trapped” from 2012’s Gravity Falls, Mermaid Fiji is one of the curiosities shown at the Mystery Shack. Weirdmageddon 3: Take Back The Falls, the concluding episode in the series, has a different adaptation.
  • Jenny Haniver: A Bizarre Creature Crafted by Sailors

    Jenny Haniver: A Bizarre Creature Crafted by Sailors

    • Jenny Haniver, disguised skate specimens, were sold as sea monster “corpses” by sailors.
    • The name likely originated from French.
    • Historically, fake sea creatures like Jenny Haniver were sold as exotic oddities.

    Dried marine life specimens known as “Jenny Haniver” were traded between European sailors and collectors, sometimes under the guise of the “corpse of an unidentified creature captured at sea.” In reality, it is a dried specimen of a skatefish that has undergone extensive processing to make it seem like a monster or extraterrestrial.

    Origin of the Name

    The origin and meaning of the name are not known. The most accepted hypothesis is that it is an anglicization of some French words. According to this, “Jenny Haniver” was once called “jeune d’Anvers” in French, which means “young from Antwerp,” and was renamed “Jenny Haniver” by English seamen with Cockney accents. It appears that the pioneers in the production of these fakes for resale as “mermaid corpses” were the British fishermen of Antwerp.

    Another theory is the combination of the names “Genoa” and “Antwerp”.

    Jenny Haniver
    (Photo: Malcolm Lidbury, cc by-sa 3.0, enhanced)

    History of the Jenny Haniver

    A Jenny Haniver was a fake monster created by cutting, folding, and otherwise disfiguring mostly the corpse of a guitarfish (the general name for the family of animals Rhinobatidae) or a thornback ray to make it seem like a demonic or angelic humanoid.

    Skates like the guitarfish and angelshark were processed by sailors at Antwerp shipyards to make these “unidentified creatures.” They cut off features like wings and tails to make the animals seem more like demons, miniature dragons, or angels.

    The specimens were dried and varnished, making it impossible to determine their genuine nature. These finished “unidentified creature specimens” were sold by sailors to tourists as a source of extra revenue. Legendary creatures such as Basilisks and Sea Monks were frequently used to describe these instances.

    It is an Old Tradition

    Jenny Haniver
    (Photo: Malcolm Lidbury, cc by-sa 3.0, enhanced)

    Altering the physical appearance of animals of different races in order to create forgeries is an old tradition. In Volume 4 of his “Historia Animalium,” Swiss physician and naturalist Konrad Gesner offers one of the first accounts of Jenny Haniver in 1558. “Skates in disguise”, not some mythical creatures, were the focus of his explanation.

    According to Gesner, the hoax was widespread. In the markets of Zürich (Switzerland), they were sometimes passed off as basilisks. Many Jenny Hanivers were made in Belgium, France, and Italy. Many have been found in Milan, Venice, and Verona, and they were made especially in the 16th century with Mediterranean fish.

    The goal was generally to fool people into buying the body under false pretenses, such as a newborn dragon, basilisk, alien corpse, or other cryptozoological rarities. However, Jenny Haniver is also commonly cited as a potential explanation for the Sea Monk (or Monkfish) that washed up on a Danish beach in 1546 and other enigmatic sea animals documented in history.

    Ulisse Aldrovandi, in his De piscibus libri V, et De cetis lib. unus (published posthumously in 1613), describes “a dragon made from a ray.”

    A Jenny Haniver as a dragon, made of thornback ray. 17th-18th centuries, length 26 inches
    A Jenny Haniver as a dragon, made of thornback ray. 17th-18th centuries, length 26 inches. (Zde, cc by-sa 4.0, cropped)

    Jenny Haniver Today

    Their modern samples are now used in biological research. A Jenny Haniver, coming in at a hefty 21 inches (54 cm) in length and 11.5 inches (29 cm) across, may be seen at London’s Natural History Museum. Aquariums may occasionally include such creatures for viewing. There is a wide spectrum of reactions to them, from “scary” to “cute,” and strange products like keychains have been made using their likeness.

    It Still Fools People

    The curanderos (the native healers of Latin America) in Veracruz, Mexico, still use Jenny Hanivers because they believe the animals possess mystical properties. They are used in voodoo ceremonies. In fact, the mummified copies are sold to tourists from the region. But the fishermen who sell them do not hide that they are carcasses of stingrays, cut by knife soon after being caught, and later left to dry in the sun.

    Jenny Haniver
    (Lovej, cc by-sa 3.0)

    Interestingly, Jenny Hanivers have been mass-produced and falsely marketed as strange beings even today. In 1971, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, a teacher of physical education who was fascinated by paranormal phenomena claimed to have caught a strange fish that could emerge from the water, breathe, and stand up like a person. This anthropomorphic beast was even given a special name. The teacher supposedly made his discoveries public in a book he released in 1974.

    The most recent case of Jenny Haniver getting widespread attention is from Italy in July 2006. “Red as a Martian” was the title of a printed news story published by a local magazine and afterwards by a regional newspaper. The origin of this weird entity was a storage area for leftovers from the refurbishment of a building in Milan.

    How They Are Made

    A shovelnose guitarfish.
    A shovelnose guitarfish. (Greg Huma, cc by-sa 3.0, rotated)

    Jenny Haniver has been recreated using daily equipment and procedures based on historical precedents. It has been replicated using the following methods:

    • Pick a skate species, like the guitarfish, that is flat and simple to dry.
    • Scrub the new skate with vinegar and a brush to get rid of any remaining slime.
    • Cut away from the back, being careful not to nick the “face,” and avoid the spine.
    • Soak it in saltwater until the water is completely absorbed, then stuff absorbent sheets inside its stomach, wrap it up, and dehydrate it in the fridge overnight.
    • Put it in a net and dry it in the sun; the net will keep the insects away.
    • After it has dried to a certain point, you may cut it to your desired form by manipulating the fins and other components. Skatefish do not have true necks, but by cutting off their gill slits on the left and right, you may give them the appearance of having one.
    • To finish drying in the sun, position the “wings,” “limbs,” and “tail” as desired, fastening them with thread or clothespins. Smoke may be used to speed up the drying process or give something an aged look.
    The underside of a skatefish.
    The underside of a skatefish. 1879.

    Jenny Haniver in the East

    While Jenny Haniver is firmly rooted in the Western canon, the practice of passing off dried specimens of monkeys sewn onto fish as Fiji mermaid mummies has been widely documented in Japan. They are kept in temples, and the Temple of Amaterasu in Fujiyoshida, Shizuoka Prefecture, is one location where these mermaid (“ningyo”) mummies can be seen.

    People on social media talk about the creepy look of dried skate every day, and there are even smartphone applications for producing these dried specimens.

  • Eduard Einstein: The Second Son of Albert Einstein

    Eduard Einstein: The Second Son of Albert Einstein

    • Eduard, Albert Einstein’s son, excelled in poetry and music.
    • He was diagnosed with schizophrenia and spent years in psychiatric care.
    • Eduard’s literary aspirations were discouraged by his father, Albert Einstein.
      buy wellbutrin online https://newonlineandblo.com/buy-wellbutrin.html no prescription pharmacy


    The second son of Albert Einstein and his wife Mileva Maric, Eduard Einstein was born on July 28, 1910, in Zurich, and died on October 25, 1965, in the same city. Eduard Einstein, whom his father affectionately called “Tete,” was a sensitive little boy who excelled in poetry and music early on in his life. While Einstein’s mother Pauline and the aunt Maja probably met Eduard, the grandfather Hermann died long before that.

    Relationship Between Albert and Eduard Einstein

    Both Eduard and his brother Hans Albert Einstein were affected by their parents’ divorce and spent most of their childhood in Switzerland with their mother. Most of his teachers liked and respected Eduard. It is widely believed that he did not speak to his father Albert for the first five years following their separation in June 1914. However, there was nothing unusual about his communication with his father throughout his adolescence, even in the 1920s.

    The October 1920 visit that Albert Einstein paid to the home of Pastor Camillo Brandhuber (a friend of his from his days in Benzingen) also featured Eduard. On October 7 or 8, 1923, Albert and Eduard once again visited relatives in Ulm, and while there, Albert took Eduard up the tower of Ulm Cathedral.

    Together with Hans Albert, they later visited the Lautrach Castle, which belonged to a patron and business associate who was a friend of Albert. Despite some rocky patches, the bond between Eduard and his mother remained strong throughout his childhood.

    His Literary Career

    Eduard Einstein’s surviving poetry has, like his father’s, frequent sarcastic characteristics; some of it was even published in school newspapers during his lifetime. For instance, the poetic studies by Eduard Einstein examined the perspectives of educators and peers. These analyses not only indicated a socially critical stance but also provided new insight into the precarious position of the bourgeois idyll in German-speaking Switzerland.

    A tremendous existential fear, resulting from the enormous insensitivity and absurdity inherent in the world, was reflected in Eduard’s work. This view was prevalent not just in the ‘ivory tower’, but also in the framework of contemporary bourgeois culture.

    Classmate and future Nobel laureate in literature Elias Canetti wrote a fictional biography, The Tongue Set Free (1977), on several of the professors mentioned in Eduard Einstein’s character studies. Albert was a major audience for Eduard Einstein’s aphorisms, in which he makes references to the likes of Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche.

    buy arimidex online https://esishow.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/arimidex.html no prescription pharmacy

    Albert provided him with comments on his writings, but he understandably discouraged the son from pursuing a career in literature.

    Eduard Einstein’s Schizophrenia

    Eduard was originally admitted to the Burghölzli psychiatric facility in Zurich in October 1932. He received a diagnosis of schizophrenia in January 1933. According to Albert Einstein, Eduard’s ailment ran predominantly in the family of his mother.

    Albert cutting off contact with his son after his last clinic appointment is just an urban tale. Eduard’s correspondence with his now-American father just became sparser over time due to the physical distance between the two. It’s also worth mentioning that the career Eduard took was of no interest to Einstein.

    buy bactrim online https://newonlineandblo.com/buy-bactrim.html no prescription pharmacy

    albert einstein

    The End of Eduard’s Life

    Eduard Einstein spent almost 14 years in the Burghölzli psychiatric hospital in Switzerland. This period of time includes various stays of a few months in the city, each between 1942 and his mother’s death in 1948. But he especially spent the final eight years of his life in the hospital until his death at age 55 in the autumn of 1965.

    buy ozempic online https://subee.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/jpg/ozempic.html no prescription pharmacy

    Carl Seelig, the biographer of Albert Einstein who also cared for Robert Walser and others, was a father figure to Eduard from 1952 until Carl’s untimely death in 1962.

    Looking for More

    In addition to what has already been made public in the various volumes of The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, which encompass his life up to 1923, additional details regarding Eduard Einstein’s life can be located in various other sources. For instance, Franziska Rogger’s work Einstein’s Sister (in German) provides insights, particularly regarding Eduard’s initial admission to Burghölzli, as found on page 124 of her book.

    Furthermore, the Swiss historian Alexis Schwarzenbach’s publication titled The Spurned Genius offers similar information, which is documented on page 188 of his work.

    One can also refer to Hans Albert Einstein: His Life as a Pioneering Engineer by Robert Ettema and Cornelia F. Mutel which provides insights on Eduard throughout the book.

    buy lexapro online https://newonlineandblo.com/buy-lexapro.html no prescription pharmacy