Category: History

Witness the transformation across time and interpret the past of human societies while shedding light on the most prominent events.

  • In 1875 an American Spy Plotted to Kill Hundreds for Insurance Payment

    In 1875 an American Spy Plotted to Kill Hundreds for Insurance Payment

    At about 11 a.m. on December 11, 1875, a massive explosion took place in Bremerhaven. Just then, the last of the cargo was being put onto the steamer “Mosel,” which was about to depart for Southampton and then continue on to New York.

    buy kamagra gold online https://www.svmassagetherapy.com/docs/pdf/kamagra-gold.html no prescription pharmacy

    Most of the passengers were southern Germans who were looking to leave their homeland and begin a fresh life in the United States.

    The “Mosel” was a North German Lloyd (NDL) steamer. NDL was the largest German shipping firm, rivaling even the Hamburg America Line (HAPAG). Both businesses relied heavily on immigrants as a revenue source, alongside freight.

    The pier and other areas of Bremerhaven were destroyed when an explosion shook the area in the winter of 1875. A 13-foot-deep (4-meter) crater was all that remained.

    buy accutane online https://www.svmassagetherapy.com/docs/pdf/accutane.html no prescription pharmacy

    There were at than 80 fatalities and hundreds of injuries. Where did all of this terribleness come from? When the dust settled, everyone knew the explosion had happened on the hull of the ship. The calamity had been triggered by a “hell machine” buried in the barrel, according to preliminary investigations.

    Moving to a New Place

    The immigrants crossed the ocean on the massive steamships of the shipping firms, which were increasingly replacing sailing ships at the period. Liner service between continents became feasible with the advent of swift steamers, which were less reliant on the wind. The Atlantic crossing took between 10 and 14 days.

    This meant that by the time World War I broke out, more people were leaving Europe than ever before. The shipping industry reaped huge financial benefits as a result. The annual influx of German immigrants to the United States averaged over 120,000 in the 1880s. By the turn of the century, they had become the most numerous immigrants to the United States.

    Related: Ellis Island: How Did 30 Million People Immigrate to the United States?

    The majority of immigrants traveled across the Atlantic in steerage since it was the least expensive but most uncomfortable option. Steerage passengers were not afforded the same luxuries as those in first and second class. Bedframes were instead lined up and then shifted to the side on the return journey to make room for more freight. The “Mosel,” a freight and passenger ship that provided liner service between Bremerhaven and New York, was not finished until 1872. Almost seven hundred people could fit on the tween deck.

    The ship was set to leave for Southampton and then New York on the day of the accident. 600 people to be on board. But the NDL steamer “Deutschland” had recently sunk on December 6 after running aground on a sandbank outside the mouth of the Thames, prompting the crew to make an emergency stay in England. Fifty or more people had lost their lives because of the incident.

    buy zydena online https://www.svmassagetherapy.com/docs/pdf/zydena.html no prescription pharmacy

    Reasons for the Mosel Disaster

    American Civil War spy Alexander Keith Jr.
    In order to collect on an insurance claim, American Civil War spy Alexander Keith Jr. deployed a time bomb to try to sink the ship Mosel. (Credit: W. Commons)

    The survivors were brought to Southampton, where they awaited transport to the United States on the next vessel, called the “Mosel” from Bremerhaven. But then things took an unexpected turn for the worse. There was still a cart at the dock, loaded down with boxes and barrels. One of the barrels was constructed from iron-shod, dark brown wood.

    According to the bill of lading, the container weighed 1.3 tons and included high-priced iron components. Today, it seems likely that the barrel fell into the road after slipping from the grip of a port worker operating a crane.

    There was a huge bang. It is hard to piece everything together, but it is understood that the collision activated an ignite mechanism in the barrel, which contained lithofracteur (an explosive compound of nitroglycerin). While the original dynamite recipe was developed by Alfred Nobel (1833–1896), the Lithofracteur explosive combination had more explosive potential.

    Several hours after the explosion, a man was discovered critically injured in a first-class cabin and sent to the hospital. First responders assumed he had been killed in the blast, but then they discovered a pistol inside the cabin with two empty rounds. It seems the man had attempted suicide. A quick check revealed that the barrel in question was really his.

    For Fraudulent Insurance Claims

    The guy’s name was Alexander Keith Jr., and he was a Canadian of Scottish descent. As William King Thomas, he traveled over Europe. Keith, who had accumulated a lot of debt, decided to conduct insurance fraud as a means of getting out of his financial bind. Keith paid a hefty premium to insure a shipment of useless goods that was certain to be destroyed in a bombing raid at sea.

    However, the bomb wasn’t supposed to detonate for a few days, somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic. He preferred to get off the ship at Southampton, where he thought the survivors from the sinking of the “Deutschland,” the “Mosel,” would also be able to embark.

    Keith was gravely hurt in the incident and later admitted his guilt, but he passed away on December 16th, five days after the incident, thus he was never brought to justice. The Bremen police department’s examination of the case uncovered disturbing information.

    By 1873, Alexander Keith was already plotting to murder hundreds of people in return for a large insurance payout. In that year, he went to a watchmaker and asked him to construct a mechanism that could operate quietly for a few days before triggering the detonator with a hard blow. He bought the explosives while pretending to be a Jamaican mine owner.

    By the way, the assault on the “Mosel” was his third attempt. He had previously planted a bomb aboard the NDL ship Rhein in the summer of 1875. He was disheartened to learn that the ship had made it to New York but that the firing mechanism had seemingly failed.

    Because no other shipping company would take his shipment without first checking it, he made the trip to Bremerhaven to give the “Mosel” a go. Unfortunately, the transportation firm took the box anyhow. Since no further suspects could be located and Alexander Keith was already dead, the inquiry was closed in 1878.

    These days, few people remember what happened during the incident. Unfortunately, it seems that not even the little metal plate that marked the site of the disaster near the entrance to Bremerhaven’s New Harbor has survived.

  • Why Is Bavaria Not Part of Austria?

    Why Is Bavaria Not Part of Austria?

    Why is Bavaria not part of Austria? A Habsburg diplomat named Count Josef von Seilern rushed to the Munich Residence in February of 1799. There, Bavarian Elector Charles Theodore was passing away. Because of the stroke he had while playing cards, the 75-year-old was expected to die soon. As he prepared to leave the Wittelsbach, Seilern had an important assignment he needed to do. He was carrying a pact that would guarantee the Habsburgs’ rule in Bavaria, an essential document from Emperor Franz II. As expected, Austria was going to take over Bavaria.

    Seilern thought the Elector would sign the pact at the last minute. However, the messenger failed to reach Charles Theodore. Because Theodore’s wife, Maria Leopoldine, did not welcome any visits. Because of this lady, who was intended to assure the Habsburg succession in Bavaria, the Austrians’ effort to seize the crown ultimately failed.

    The Wittelsbach Dynasty Had No More Legitimate Kings or Queens

    Charles Theodore would have welcomed the opportunity to eliminate the new electorate. It had been two decades since Bavaria had fallen to him.


    The Wittelsbach dynasty had multiple branches. The Palatinate and Bavaria were dominated by the two most powerful. However, the aristocratic family had no more potential successors to the throne by the 18th century. It struggled hard to keep its hegemony in place. “House contracts” were introduced as a solution; thus, in the absence of heirs, it was only a question of combining family trees.

    Timeline-wise, this case dates back to 1777. After Maximilian III Joseph’s untimely death, Elector Charles Theodore von der Pfalz of Mannheim succeeded him as ruler of the Bavarian line. The Electorate of Palatinate-Bavaria grew overnight to become the third-biggest state in the Holy Roman Empire. Now, almost all Wittelsbach branches met in the Mannheim.


    With the exception of a minor collateral line, which we’ll get to in a while.

    However, the Elector, Charles Theodore, who was over 50 years old, had concerns about this new development. The house contracts required him to relocate from Mannheim, the capital city he had always cherished, to Munich.

    Anton Hickel depicts Elector Charles Theodore of the Palatinate and Bavaria (1724–1799)
    This 1780 artwork by Anton Hickel depicts Elector Charles Theodore of the Palatinate and Bavaria (1724–1799). In 1777, the elector was not happy when Bavaria fell to the emperor.

    Soon after his arrival, he began working to eliminate the Bavarian territories. Joseph II, Emperor of the Habsburgs, was waiting in Vienna. Still, the Austrian emperor claimed Lower Bavaria and the Upper Palatinate as his own, and he sent his army marching in. King Frederick II of Prussia, who was opposed to the Habsburgs expanding their power in the empire, responded to this development by calling a meeting of his cabinet.

    As a result, he gave the command for his men to invade Bohemia. There, the War of the Bavarian Succession started in 1778. A year later, in 1779, the combatants were able to settle their differences via negotiations. As a consequence, the Innviertel region of modern-day Upper Austria was ceded to the Habsburgs by Bavaria in exchange for their recognition of the Wittelsbach House treaty.

    Bavaria Was Too Powerful for the Elector to Eliminate

    The war raged on for another decade until Charles Theodore had a breakthrough in 1785. As a means of appeasing the Habsburg emperor, he offered a trade in which the Electorate of Bavaria would be exchanged for the Habsburg Netherlands (present-day Luxembourg and Belgium). The emperor consented, and a royal title for the new kingdom of “Burgundy” was promised to Charles Theodore.

    Someone raised a concern, and the preparations were abandoned once again. This time, it was a member of his own family who stood in his way—Charles II August, scion of the Palatinate-Zweibrücken collateral line. In order to counter Austria, he enlisted the help of Prussian King Frederick II, who joined forces with the League of Princes (“Fürstenbund”).


    As a result, the Habsburgs withdrew. The trade had to be canceled.

    Charles Theodore was unable to abolish Bavaria, no matter how hard he tried. However, another chance presented itself in 1794. There was no heir apparent after the death of his wife Elisabeth-Auguste. To prevent the Zweibrückers, who had blocked the swap with the Habsburgs, from seizing power in Electoral Palatinate Bavaria after his death, the elderly man went out to locate a new bride.

    Once again, the Habsburgs were prepared: If they couldn’t get to Bavaria via an exchange arrangement, then possibly through the succession to the throne, the emperor persuaded himself, and proposed Maria Leopoldine of the Habsburg collateral line Austria-Este as his future bride. She was just 17 when she found out about the marriage arrangements, and she was shocked. She may never have forgiven her parents for marrying her off, despite the fact that she followed all the proper courtesies. Perhaps this is also why, in 1799, while her husband lay dying, she refused to let the Habsburg ambassador in.

    As a Result of Maria Leopoldine’s Interference, Her Family’s Ambitions Were Foiled

    Maximilian I Joseph of Bavaria (1756-1825)
    Maximilian I Joseph of Bavaria (1756-1825)

    A turning point was reached after the wedding in 1795. After the death of Charles II August, heir to the throne of Palatinate-Zweibrück, his younger brother, Max Joseph, became monarch. Since the Duchy of Palatinate-Zweibrücken was captured by French Revolutionary soldiers, he was a duke without a nation. And in case you were wondering: Yes, this Max Joseph will become the first Bavarian king, Maximilian I, in 1806.

    Charles Theodore’s new wife was vital to his success. In little time at all, Maria Leopoldine had distanced herself from her husband and made it apparent that she had no intention of having children with him. The Electress’s explicit support for the Zweibrücken collateral line also crushed the Habsburgs’ expectations that they might exert influence over Charles Theodore’s inheritance.

    The Habsburgs and the Palatine Zweibrückers both aspired to consolidate control in Bavaria while Charles Theodore lay dying in February 1799. Quick thinking was evident on Maria Leopoldine’s part as she sprang into action. She declared her support for the king’s chosen successor, Max Joseph.

    It Was a Woman’s Hand That Anointed the New Monarch

    She faced Habsburg envoy Seilern in person when he showed up at the house. Given the presence of French forces, the Habsburgs could not hope for a smooth annexation of Bavaria, and Emperor Franz II certainly did not want to start another War of the Bavarian Succession. And thus it came to be that the last surviving branch of the Wittelsbach dynasty’s collateral line inherited the Bavarian throne.

    Maria Leopoldine decided to remain in Bavaria, where she quickly rose to prominence as one of the wealthiest women in the region. This was partially because of the yearly stipend she got from the Bavarian court, and partly because she started a fresh, self-sufficient existence. She became an entrepreneur despite being atypical in several ways: socially, gender-wise, and historically. She managed a farm, invested in real estate and stocks, and founded and operated a few breweries. Her tragic death in a carriage accident between Munich and Salzburg in 1848 came at the age of almost 70.

    Furthermore, what exactly occurred in Bavaria? Bavaria has always been Bavaria, and in 1806, it became a kingdom.

  • Operation Valkyrie: Attack Against Hitler of July 20, 1944

    Operation Valkyrie: Attack Against Hitler of July 20, 1944

    As the year 1943 progressed, the military situation for the Germans in World War II became more dire. The Allies were getting ready to conquer Italy when the Soviets scored a major victory at Stalingrad on the Eastern Front. The German army was starting to lose ground. The Nazi dictatorship stiffened in 1944 following the Normandy invasion and the Soviet onslaught. The German general staff decided to take action as defeat seemed more and more certain.

    In preparation for peace talks with the Allies, they plotted Operation Valkyrie, Adolf Hitler‘s death, and the collapse of the Third Reich. German resistance members made their last effort to overthrow Hitler in a conspiracy on July 20, 1944. Hitler was unharmed by the explosion, and the coup’s plotters were promptly arrested and put to death. Then, Heinrich Himmler and the Gestapo led a wave of brutal repression against any and all opponents.

    Why Was Operation Valkyrie Planned?

    The Nazi Party was established in February 1920, a time of political and economic unrest, and came to power on January 30, 1933. Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of the Reich in a Germany devastated by the Great Depression. When President Hindenburg passed away on August 2, 1934, he took over as head of state. This selection as the new German leader under the title of “Führer” ultimately led to the demise of the Weimar Republic and the rise of the Third Reich.

    Eventually, the Nazi Party was recognized as the only legitimate political organization in Germany. After Hitler’s invasion of Poland and Stalin’s subsequent signing of the German-Soviet Pact, World War II officially began that year. Starting in 1943, Germany saw a string of military defeats that ultimately undermined the Führer’s position. Hitler had been the victim of multiple failed assassination attempts dating back to 1938.

    The assassination and putsch attempt known as “Operation Valkyrie” failed to kill Adolf Hitler. The conspirators wanted to remove the Nazi system so that law and order could be restored, the Führer’s dictatorship could be ended, the war could be turned back against Germany, and peace could be speedily negotiated with the Allies.

    Who Were Operation Valkyrie’s Organizers?

    Claus von Stauffenberg.
    Claus von Stauffenberg.

    Officers in the German Wehrmacht and some of their country’s leading thinkers conceptualized and planned Operation Valkyrie. Some of the general staff disapproved of Führer’s choices after Stalingrad. The Third Reich’s downfall seemed imminent, yet they still tried to rescue everything they could. They quickly became a part of the Kreisau Circle, a group of 1938-formed intellectuals who discussed life in a post-Nazi Germany.

    Generals Olbricht and Fromm were among the several high-ranking commanders involved in the plot. Included in this group were Henning von Tresckow, Rudolf-Christoph von Gersdorff, Werner von Haeften, and Claus von Stauffenberg. They were essential to Operation Valkyrie since they were responsible for Hitler’s assassination. Furthermore, former chief of staff Ludwig Beck and former mayor of Leipzig Carl Goerdeler were also engaged.

    The scheme also included assistance from other members of the internal resistance against the Nazis. Among them were Peter Yorck von Wartenburg, Eugen Gerstenmaier, and Helmuth James von Moltke.

    What Were the Preparations for Operation Valkyrie?

    Operation Valkyrie Telex declaring Hitler's death
    Operation Valkyrie Telex declaring Hitler’s death. Image: German Bundesarchiv.

    People generally agree that there were two major phases to the failed putsch on July 20, 1944. The first was the assassination of Adolf Hitler; the second was the seizure of power and the establishment of a new regime. It was in the summer of 1943 that General von Tresckow and Count von Stauffenberg agreed to resurrect an emergency plan from 1940 called Operation Valkyrie. The idea was to employ General Fromm’s reserve force to seize control of the key cities.

    With his promotion to Chief of Staff on July 1, 1944, Claus von Stauffenberg gained access to Hitler and his inner circle. Attending meetings in the Führer’s primary residences of Berghof and Wolfsschanze on July 6, 11, and 15. Three times he had explosives with him but chose not to detonate them, mostly because Himmler was not around. Before Hitler was killed, the conspirators hatched a plan for a transitional administration to take power when the Nazis were toppled. Key posts were held by Ludwig Beck, the Reich President, and Carl Friedrich Goerdeler, the Chancellor of the Reich. As the coup approached on July 19, General Olbricht sent a warning to the key conspirators.

    How Did the Assassination Attempt of July 20, 1944 Unfold?

    Adolf Hitler’s pants after the assassination attempt.
    Adolf Hitler’s pants after the assassination attempt.

    Colonel von Stauffenberg and Oberleutnant von Haeften traveled to the Wolfsschanze in Rastenburg, East Prussia, on July 20, 1944. Upon entering the “Wolf’s Lair,” they were informed that their scheduled meeting with Hitler had been moved forward in anticipation of Mussolini’s arrival. When only one of the two explosives intended for the assault could be detonated in time, Stauffenberg gave the other, still unprimed, to Haeften. Once inside, he positioned the bomb beneath the table at the Führer’s feet. On the other hand, an officer pushed the briefcase too far, and it slid under the table and became stuck behind a sturdy leg.

    The colonel vanished suddenly, and the bomb went off at 12:42. Four individuals were killed, although nobody was really targeted. Lucky for him, Adolf Hitler escaped with just minor wounds, including scrapes and minor burns. Even after seeing the magnitude of the destruction, Stauffenberg and Haeften left the Wolfsschanze certain that their assault had been successful. At 1:15 p.m., they boarded a plane to Berlin in preparation for the start of Operation Valkyrie, with the assumption that Hitler had already been assassinated.

    How Did the Attempted Coup d’état of July 20, 1944 Take Place?

    Although several conspirators were holding a meeting in Berlin, the situation was unclear for a while in the afternoon. If the assault had happened, and if Hitler had survived, the details were murky. Friedrich Olbricht went against General Fellgiebel’s recommendation and postponed the measure. In the afternoon, at about 4:30, they were joined by Stauffenberg and Haeften, who confirmed the Führer’s death. At long last, Operation Valkyrie got underway.

    The coup plotters seized government buildings and detained SS members from Paris to Prague. Yet again, the operation was a failure since not all cops were given their instructions. The Bendlerblock, where the Wehrmacht was commanded, was the meeting place for the chief conspirators. However, Hitler was informed of the scheme, and word of his survival reached Berlin very soon. In Prague, Vienna, and Paris, supporters of the military putsch halted activities due to widespread chaos. The Bendlerblock was encircled by Führer forces at about 11 p.m. There had been no success in the coup.

    What Were the Results of Operation Valkyrie?

    After finding that Hitler was still alive, General Fromm, who was in charge of the reserve army, turned against the conspirators. Just before midnight, he ordered his soldiers inside the Bendlerblock and arrested everyone there. He had his erstwhile associates, including Olbricht, Haeften, Stauffenberg, and Beck, killed quickly to keep them from betraying him. The Führer made a radio address the following day, promising the total destruction of the traitors. Due to the defeat of Operation Valkyrie, the German resistance was put through brutal repression.

    Heinrich Himmler, leader of the SS and Gestapo, orchestrated this. Nearly 5,000 alleged regime opponents were imprisoned, tortured, and prosecuted by the Nazis in the weeks that followed. Following their trials, several of them were executed by hanging in Reich prisons. Most of the conspirators were given death sentences and put to death by Judge Roland Freisler. A few of them, like Henning von Tresckow and Günther von Kluge, took their own lives instead. Their families were sent to extermination camps, where most of the conspirators perished. It was the height of Nazi horror.

    What Were the Reactions to Operation Valkyrie?

    The failure of Operation Valkyrie further strengthened Adolf Hitler’s standing in the eyes of the people, and the conspirators’ goal of bringing down the Third Reich only made it more authoritarian. Fearful of the impending arrival of the Red Army, the population and the military united behind their Führer. The Wehrmacht was subjugated, and the traditional military salute was substituted with the Nazi salute. Support for Hitler became strong in Germany as political indoctrination and Nazi propaganda reached unprecedented heights.

    Nonetheless, the action was seen from afar by the Allies and Russia. Ten years later, in 1952, at the conclusion of the Remer trial, those responsible for the attempt on Hitler were hailed as heroes. Angela Merkel paid tribute to them and opened a permanent exhibit at the German Resistance Memorial on June 28th, 2014. Their deaths had shown the world that German officers opposed the Nazis.

    References

    • Burleigh, M. (2012). The Third Reich: A New History. London: Pan Macmillan. ISBN 9780330475501.
    • Page, Helena (1993). General Friedrich Olbricht: Ein Mann des 20. Julis. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag. ISBN 3-416-02514-8.
    • Jones, Nigel (2008). Countdown to Valkyrie: The July Plot to Assassinate Hitler. Frontline. ISBN 978-1-84832-508-1.
    • Rüthers, Bernd (2005). Spiegelbild einer Verschwörung – Zwei Abschiedsbriefe zum 20 July 1944. Juristenzeitung 14. pp. 689–698.
    • Fest, J. (1997). Plotting Hitler’s Death: The Story of German Resistance. New York: Henry Holt and Company. ISBN 9780805056488.
  • Struwwelpeter: A Popular Children’s Book With Dark Tales

    Struwwelpeter: A Popular Children’s Book With Dark Tales

    Struwwelpeter is one of the most popular children’s books ever written. And this original Christmas gift has spawned many humorous imitations. In Frankfurt in 1844, Dr. Heinrich Hoffmann was searching for a Christmas gift for his son Carl. Children at that age cannot yet read, hence a picture book was chosen.

    buy symbicort inhaler online https://buyinfoblo.com/buy-symbicort-inhaler.html no prescription pharmacy

    After searching the city’s bookshops, Hoffmann (1809–1894) was left with only long novels or comical picture collections, realistic illustrations, and plain morals, as he later reflected.

    After another futile hunt, Hoffmann eventually went home, this time with an empty notepad. He started doodling and making up rhymes, eventually coming up with the basic concept for “Struwwelpeter.”

    “Struwwelpeter” is sometimes referred to as “shock literature” because of its vivid and at times, gruesome consequences for the misbehaving children. It aimed to shock children into good behavior through these cautionary tales.

    Laugh-Out-Loud Anecdotes and Cartoons

    Nikolas, just before he drowns three little boys in his inkwell, 1917. Struwwelpeter
    Nikolas, just before he drowns three little boys in his inkwell, 1917.

    Formerly known as “Funny Stories and Droll Pictures,” this term is now used as the book’s subtitle. Despite mounting pressure from a variety of quarters, Hoffmann remained unconvinced that he should make the booklet accessible to the public. But his family worried that his small son might eventually rip up the pamphlet anyway. Hoffmann was a member of a group called Tutti Frutti that gathered weekly to hear inspiring speeches and/or musical creations, and they were also pushing for Hoffmann’s work to be published.

    In the middle of January 1845, only a few weeks after Hoffmann had delivered the gift to his son, the Tutti Frutti (Italian for “all the fruits”) got together again. Zwiebel, as Hoffmann was known in this community, read his writing, and the fruits were thrilled.

    buy estradiol online https://buyinfoblo.com/buy-estradiol.html no prescription pharmacy

    One of them, known by a pen name, Spargel (“Asparagus”), had just co-founded a publishing enterprise with a business partner. He proposed 80 guilders to Hoffmann for the text. Hoffmann concurred. This deal had transformed him into a literary celebrity among teenagers practically overnight.

    Struwwelpeter Ruled the Globe

    The first print run of 1500 copies was quickly depleted. Depending on the source, the edition sold out anywhere from one to two months after its release. In short order, the original six were joined by others, such as the tales of Paulinchen, who plays with matches, The Story of Fidgety Philip, and The Story of Flying Robert. Internationally, the piece was likewise met with great acclaim.

    The American adaptation, named “Slovenly Peter,” was penned by none other than the great humorist Mark Twain.

    What Made Struwwelpeter So Popular?

    Struwwelpeter Slovenly Peter by Mark Twain.
    Slovenly Peter by Mark Twain.

    But what made this book such a hit with readers? The two most important explanations have to do with technology and cultural shifts, respectively. By the middle of the 19th century, industrialization had made it feasible to duplicate books at much lower costs. Lithography made it possible to print books without the once-expensive practice of hand-coloring their illustrations.

    As a result of societal changes that started at the tail end of the 18th century, middle-class women also had greater time for what we now term “leisure” activities. Furthermore, a larger percentage of adults started to see childhood as a distinct phase of development. This resulted in the publishing industry taking notice of mothers and their children as a new target demographic. This marked the official introduction of children’s books to the mainstream reading public.

    There was a newfound focus on writing and publishing children’s literature. Why, however, did “Struwwelpeter” stand out and become so well-liked? The tales in “Struwwelpeter” presumably struck a chord with readers because they reflected common observations about children at the time and today, such as the refusal of certain children to sit still or eat what is put in front of them or the harassment and intimidation of others, like in the case of The Story of the Inky Boys.

    Both the original “Struwwelpeter” and its updated “Struwwelpaula” were featured in a Berlin exhibition back in 1994. Struwwelpaula is an example of a punk character.

    However, it’s not just that. Even though they were intended for youngsters, Hoffmann’s illustrations and narrative were designed mainly for adults. The tales’ potential educational value is now a matter of debate. Since the original publication, a sizable body of literature has amassed, and with it, a wide range of opinions and valuations.

    The underlying depravity, melancholy, and suffering, according to some, make the work unsuitable for young readers. However, there is another group of people that highlight the chaos, ostentation, and fun that result from Struwwelpeter. Thus, it is not surprising that Struwwelpeter has been the subject of not just countless translations since its inception, but also innumerable parodies and fresh interpretations.

    An “Egyptian Struwwelpeter” was in use by the late 19th century. Marie von Ebner-Eschenbach (1830–1916) had an unauthorized print of the book, which was originally written by the three Viennese siblings. Truwwelpeter’s many incarnations are a mirror of society’s shifting mores. For instance, the “Struwwelliese” was written in the 1950s, and the “Struwwelpaula” in the 1990s; in both, a young girl dresses as a punk and travels the nation spraying subway cars with graffiti.

    The Political Versions of Struwwelpeter

    Struwwelhitler 2
    Struwwelhitler.

    Most notably, there was a flood of political parodies. In 1848, the year of the French revolution, there was, for instance, the proper Struwwelpeter in the role of a revolutionary. The “New Reichstag Struwwelpeter” appeared in print in 1903. The Soup Kaspar’s lines, “Don’t let them in. We don’t need a soci, no!” are meant to represent the concerns of the Social Democratic Party’s seasoned political guard after the party’s electoral victory.

    The English brothers Robert and Philip Spence published “Struwwelhitler” under the pen name “Dr.

    buy augmentin online https://buyinfoblo.com/buy-augmentin.html no prescription pharmacy

    Schrecklichkeit” in 1941, and in 1914 they released “Swollen-Headed William” to mock the German Kaiser Wilhelm II for propaganda reasons. In this book, two writers lampoon Adolf Hitler, Hermann Goring, Joseph Goebbels, and Benito Mussolini.

    Before British troops were sent to the mainland, they were handed this book, which had been quickly and inexpensively printed.

    The Continued Relevance of Struwwelpeter

    The Struwwelpeter Museum.
    The Struwwelpeter Museum.

    Even though “Struwwelpeter” has taken a lot of heat over the years for making some dubious moral claims, many people still know and enjoy the tales. A new edition was released, and an exhibition was presented at the Museum of Cultural History in Germany in 2022.

    Additionally, the Struwwelpeter Museum in Hoffmann’s birthplace of Frankfurt remains a popular destination among visitors. According to a study report written in 2020 by a philologist at the University of Krakow, Struwwelpeter’s continued relevance may be attributed to the work’s ambivalence and ambiguity.

  • Invention of the Tire: History and Development

    Invention of the Tire: History and Development

    About 3500 BC., the wheel was created. Stone wheels were used in the oldest forms of transportation. It eventually took the shape of a curved plank of wood. Leather was then installed to soften the ride. Rubber gradually replaced the leather. Before the pneumatic tires, the first rubber tires were solid pieces of rubber without air within them. It was around 1830 when Frenchman Charles Dietz first covered the wheels of some vehicles with a rubber band, placing it between the wheel and the metal rim, therefore inventing the tire. Scottish inventor Robert William Thomson filed the first patent for a pneumatic tire in 1847.

    The first pneumatic tire

    The first pneumatic tire was invented by Robert William Thomson, whose aerial wheel was shown in a patent drawing published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
    The first pneumatic tire was invented by Robert William Thomson, whose aerial wheel was shown in a patent drawing published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

    The first pneumatic tire in history first appeared on horse-drawn carriages and then on early vehicles. R. W. Thomson, a Scottish engineer, received a patent in 1845 for the first pneumatic tire, which used compressed air to sustain the weight of the vehicle. He called it aerial wheel.

    He installed his tire onto a number of different horse-drawn carriages, making travel much more pleasant and quieter for its passengers. Despite traveling over 1,200 miles, one pair showed no signs of wear and tear.

    It was the first patent filled for a tire and it was the first air-filled tire in history. However, nobody paid any attention to the innovation, and it eventually died out.

    In the 1880s, the road in front of the home of John Boyd Dunlop (1840-1921), a Scottish veterinarian working in Ireland, was a little rough. So, he put rubberized tubes on the wheels of his son’s tricycle and fiddled with the wheels. Then, in 1887, he created a woven cotton fabric-encased inner tube that he bonded to a wooden wheel rim.

    In 1888, John Boyd Dunlop produced one the first pneumatic tires. The tire consisted of a casing around an air chamber filled using a pump, in order to reduce the vibrations conveyed by the wheels of his son’s tricycle. Over the years, similar tires emerged, and eventually, a piano string was encased in a tubular tire.

    Dunlop envisioned a thin rubber membrane packed with pressurized air as an alternative to the traditional solid bicycle tires.

    The first practical tires

    John Dunlop riding his bicycle with pneumatic tires.
    John Dunlop riding his bicycle with pneumatic tires.

    With the help of Englishman James Moore, who won the inaugural bicycle race in the park of Saint-Cloud, Dunlop perfected his creation. Using the rubber vulcanization technique created by American chemist Charles Goodyear in 1842, Dunlop received a patent for his invention in 1888 and went on to start a factory dedicated to making tires for bicycles. It was the first tire factory in history.

    Rubber vulcanization stabilized the rubber, allowing it to better endure temperature changes, making tires practical for the first time.

    The first car with tires

    André Michelin's L'Eclair, the first car with tires in 1895.
    André Michelin’s L’Eclair, the first car with tires in 1895.

    In 1888, Benz built the first gasoline-powered automobile, complete with air-filled rubber tires mounted on metal rims. But it wasn’t until 1895 that André Michelin came up with the notion to put them on automobiles. The Frenchman built one of the first automobiles to run on tires, which he dubbed “L’Eclair.” (“Lightning”) Michelin’s “L’Eclair” is the world’s first automobile with actual tires.

    It was the earliest car to use pneumatic tires and compete in a motor race. This was made feasible by the invention of the removable tire in that year, which allowed for puncture repairs thanks to its inner tubes. This product had quick popularity due to the rise of cars and motorcycles.

    In 1895, the ‘Eclair’ car raced from Paris to Bordeaux and back on Michelin tires for a total of 745 miles (1200 kilometers).

    The Michelin brothers, Andre and Edouard, unmistakably connected their surname with the use of tires on bicycles and cars. Tires for bicycles, carriages, and planes were all created by the Michelin brothers. In 1905, the first tire with treads was produced.

    The first radial tire

    Michelin X, radial tire, 1946.
    Michelin X, radial tire, 1946.

    Patented first in 1914 by G.H. Hamilton and T. Sloper in London, the original concepts for radial tires never made it to market. Later, the radial tire was first mass-produced by the Michelin company. Michelin engineer Marius Mignol created the company’s first automobile radial tire, the Michelin X, in 1946.

    And as far as bicycles go, John Boyd Dunlop’s innovation was a huge hit. But the main problem was that punctures were quite hard to fix. With the invention of the radial tire in 1946, Michelin cemented its position as a market leader.

    The radial tire was far more durable than previous models because it superimposed many layers of rubber. Then Michelin developed a puncture-resistant tire, cementing the company’s position as the industry standard in the history and development of tires.

    Later developments in tires

    Texas and Pacific Silver Slipper in 1933, Budd factory. The train was gasoline-powered.
    Texas and Pacific Silver Slipper in 1933, Budd factory. The train was gasoline-powered.

    The first rail tire was created in 1929 to equip the Micheline.
    Michelin created the first studded tire for use on snowy or icy roads in 1933.

    The first radial ply tire, which represented another revolution, was patented by Michelin on June 4, 1946. The Citroen Traction Avant was the first automobile to have it. Edward Brice Killen created the tubeless tire in 1930 which Michelin used it for the first time in 1955.

    Tires are becoming more advanced nowadays, with features like siped tires for increased traction in the snow or fuel-efficient tires.

  • Where did Troy’s Priam’s Treasure originate from?

    Where did Troy’s Priam’s Treasure originate from?

    There has been a mystery about the origin of the gold for “Priam’s Treasure” for almost 150 years. The first signs have appeared. Scientific tests have shown that the gold jewelry unearthed in Bronze Age Troy is chemically identical to the gold found in the royal tombs of Ur, in Mesopotamia. More than four thousand years ago, this points to extensive trading and transportation of the valuable metal.

    While digging in what he believed to be ancient Troy in 1873, archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann discovered more than just city ruins. He also uncovered “Priam’s Treasure,” a trove of gold jewelry, silver cups, and bronze daggers, in one of the archaeological strata. To add to the rarity of the discovery, recent research has shown that the artifact in question does not originate from antiquity but rather the early Bronze Age, some four thousand years ago.

    An ancient gold puzzle from the Bronze Age

    Poliochne gold jewelry from Lemnos, dating back to the Bronze Age. It's unknown where this gold came from.
    Poliochne gold jewelry from Lemnos, dating back to the Bronze Age. It’s unknown where this gold came from. (Credit: OEAI Vienna/Christoph Schwall)

    Researchers say that such large hoards of costly goods are unprecedented in the Aegean and western Anatolia, making the discovery of such an abundance of high-quality gold pieces all the more surprising. It was not only in this one city of the Early Bronze Age that gold and other valuables began to be hoarded; this trend seems to have spread to other urban centers at the same time.

    It has been a mystery up until this point where these priceless items originated from, who their owners were, whether or not the jewelry was made locally, and most importantly, where the gold came from.

    buy keflex online http://culia.net/onlinebooking/html/keflex.html no prescription pharmacy

    Even Priam’s Treasure, a legendary hoard, is not exempt from this trend. Archaeology and archaeometry have been puzzling about the source of this gold since Schliemann’s day.
    buy periactin online http://culia.net/onlinebooking/html/periactin.html no prescription pharmacy

    Initial samples with a mobile laser

    This is because taking the discoveries to the lab and taking samples there would be essential to correctly assessing the gold in these riches. This is due to the fact that, in addition to gold, other metals, including silver, copper, tin, palladium, and platinum, are always present in antique jewelry. According to the researchers, t heir relative abundance in an alloy may provide light on a precious metal’s origin and processing history. Necklaces, pendants, earrings, and other jewelry from Troy are so valuable that they cannot be damaged in transit to or during examination in a lab.

    Now, thanks to the work of Moritz Numrich and his team, this issue can be remedied using portable laser ablation equipment, which burns a hole in the pieces right there in the museum without anybody noticing it. Mass spectrometry was then used to determine the elements present in 61 gold artifacts discovered at Troy and the Bronze Age settlement of Poliochne on the Greek island of Lemnos.

    This is the same gold that was in Troy and Ur

    In the Bronze Age, there were jewelry hoards and gold mines.
    In the Bronze Age, there were jewelry hoards and gold mines. (Credit: Map by Ch. Schwall and M. Börner based on work by Numrich)

    Shockingly, the gold from Troy (Priam’s Treasure) and Poliochne has the same chemical make-up as artifacts unearthed from the royal tombs of Ur in Mesopotamia, despite the fact that these sites are separated by hundreds of miles of desert. The scientists also discovered that the trace elements in the gold jewelry from the Bronze Age of Georgia were identical to those in the gold from Troy’s Treasure of Priam.

    It’s possible that long-distance transit of the precious metal occurred over four thousand years ago. Presumably, these far-flung places maintained commercial ties with one another. This is corroborated by the discovery of Early Bronze Age jewelry with startlingly comparable designs from the Aegean to the Indus Valley in today’s Pakistan, such as earrings with spiral motifs.

    Archaeologists argue that the widespread similarity of these pieces of jewelry indicates that not only the precious metal was transported between these far-flung regions during the period, but also the jewelry itself. Jewelers may have moved freely among these Bronze Age countries.

    Does Georgia have anything to do with the origin of this gold?
    buy desyrel online http://culia.net/onlinebooking/html/desyrel.html no prescription pharmacy

    So, what does this imply about the history of the Trojan gold? Gold from the royal tombs of Ur may have been transported to Mesopotamia from western Anatolia, since this region is not known to have any natural gold reserves. As it turns out, there is a shred of evidence suggesting that gold was first discovered in that area. However, Ur has been shown to have established trading relationships with a wide variety of other areas.

    Georgia is included in this. Bronze Age gold from Georgia exhibits the most similarity to gold from Troy’s Treasure of Priam, Poliochne, and Ur in terms of the quantity of trace elements. This idea is, however, still unproven due to a lack of regional data and further inquiry into other things.

    The gold from Troy’s Treasure of Priam and Ur, however, very certainly did not come from Bronze Age mines. In contrast, the high levels of tin, palladium, and platinum in the gold jewelry indicate that the precious metal was likely originally gold dust washed from a river. The subject of the river’s precise location, however, remains unanswered.

  • History of Japan: From the Origins to the Medieval Period

    History of Japan: From the Origins to the Medieval Period

    The samurai is one of the most iconic figures associated with the history of medieval Japan. One of the most intriguing and memorable eras in the history of the Empire of the Rising Sun is the time of feudalism and civil wars. But all that preceded was plunged into the shade. As the 19th century drew to a close, the question of how Japan developed into a feudal empire sparked widespread interest. Together, let’s explore the ancient Japanese past, from prehistory to the rise of the imperial shogunate.

    At the Dawn of Japanese History: The Jōmon Period (14000 BC–300 BC)

    Reconstruction of a Yayoi period house in Kyushu.
    Reconstruction of a Yayoi period house in Kyushu.

    The Shinto goddess Amaterasu was said to have provided the divine ancestry for the Japanese imperial family, giving them the right to rule the country. The Empire was just imperial in name at first, though.

    While evidence of human habitation in Japan can be traced back to before 14,000 BC, the archipelago did not begin to take shape until around 300 BC. Peasants and fishermen made up the vast majority of Japan’s population at the time, and they lived in seasonal settlements that migrated across the country. The people who lived during the Jōmon period were known as “the market gardeners’ civilization” because they engaged in fishing, hunting, and primitive types of agriculture.

    There was no such thing as money at the time, but jade daggers, ceramics, and shell-crafted things were beginning to emerge as popular handicrafts. Dogû is a kind of elaborate pottery that was discovered during the late Jōmon period, about 400 BC. There is no doubt that these works of art originated in Japan.

    There was no Buddhism there at the time, just diverse shamanic rituals. It was believed that shamans could tap into the unseen realm and predict the future. They pray for prosperous harvests, appease the spirits, and protect against natural disasters and bad forces.

    Japan and China: The Yayoi Period (300 BC–300 CE)

    A Yayoi period dōtaku bell, 3rd century AD
    A Yayoi period dōtaku bell, 3rd century AD.

    A dramatic shift in Japanese culture occurred at the start of the Yayoi period, about 300 BC. At this time, Shintoism was developing, governmental structures were being put in place, and trade with China was beginning to take place. The Yayoi, who came in from northern Kyûshu, the southernmost of the four main islands that make up the Japanese archipelago, were the ones who introduced these novelties.

    Around 100 BC, Japan began producing its first metal goods, while the raw materials presumably originated in Korea. Communication with the Chinese and Koreans brought metalworking techniques, including bronze and iron, to Japan. Rapidly spreading from its origins in northern Kyushu, this groundbreaking idea has already changed the face of the whole island. Iron tools were put to use in farming, and the subsequent rise of the rice culture isolated and confined the rural population to their fields and homes made of mud and straw. Also, this system was only possible because of the rise of the settled population.

    Landowners accumulated wealth, passed it down through the generations, and it increased the power of the ruling clan. Over time, they developed into something like feudal lords, complete with the power to impose taxes as well as administer justice and religious ceremonies. It was during this period that the first clans emerged. This aristocratic class’s religious function also bolstered their influence in politics. It was only they who had access to the holy items, could communicate with the other side, and understood the rituals of worship to the letter. The respect and admiration of others are a direct result of this accomplishment, further solidifying their position as leaders. Since bronze was less practical than iron for agricultural labor, it was relegated to the role of a symbol used in ceremonies, which eventually became an integral part of the governmental system.

    In other words, the Yayoi era did not mark the end of the old shamanistic practices that had existed since the Jōmon period. Shinto, a religion with animist and polytheist elements, is still widely practiced in modern Japan. Shinto was founded on the idea that there were “6 million gods,” also known as kami (or spirits), who resided inside of everything and stood for each natural element. For instance, the fox deity Inari Ōkami, who was revered for his role in the harvest, was one of the most important kami.

    In order to ensure a bountiful crop, they prayed to him. Shinto’s emphasis on cleanliness was similar to that of other religions. A person must periodically pray and do particular rites to rid themselves of their impurities (kegara), or else they will bring unhappiness and disaster upon themselves and everyone around them. The foundational myths of Japan, such as that the goddess Izanami and the god Izanagi created the country, have their origins in the Shinto faith.

    The Japanese, who were known as the Wa at the time, first appeared in written Chinese. The fabled empress Himiko of Yamataitoku, who served as temporal ruler and high priestess, is said to have founded the empire around the third century (yet another fusion of spiritual and temporal powers). This empress may have existed, and she may have had some bearing on the later Yamato rule (from which the renowned battleship Yamato takes its name), although none of these claims have been verified.

    The Emerging Empire: The Kofun Period (300 AD–538 AD)

    The Nintoku mausoleum in Sakai, Osaka prefecture, Japan, part of the Mozu-Furuichi group of ancient burial sites known as kofun.
    The Nintoku mausoleum in Sakai, Osaka prefecture, Japan, part of the Mozu-Furuichi group of ancient burial sites known as kofun (Source: KYODO, Japan Times).

    Towards the end of the 3rd century, gradually emerges what would later become the imperial house: the Yamato court. The clans in the Bizen region, along the shores of the Inland Sea, gain power to the extent of establishing their dominance over the southern part of Honshu and a portion of northern Kyushu. The dominant clans include Soga, Katsuraki, Heguri, and Koze, later joined by the Kibi clans of Izumo (further northwest), Otomo, Mononobe, Nakatomi, and Inbe.

    Each of these clans retains leadership in its region (kuni) but unites with others under the direction of the Yamato court. The Soga, Mononobe, and Otomo clans are particularly influential. Each claims imperial and/or divine lineage. The Katsuraki, initially the most powerful, had to yield to the Otomo, who endorsed Emperor Keitai during a succession dispute at the end of the 5th century.

    The Yamato court developed its own administration, introducing positions such as the Minister of the Treasury. While the Emperor allowed clans relative autonomy on their lands, his authority was absolute, with even clan leaders submitting to his will. In practice, certain clans held more influence, often due to marital alliances with the Emperor’s family.

    The aristocracy, comprising clan members under the leadership of their patriarch, was granted the first hereditary noble titles. Advanced military techniques, including cavalry, emerged, and sword usage also originated during this period.

    The Yamato court became a key interlocutor with Korean kingdoms and the Middle Kingdom. By the late 5th century, the Emperor of Wa (Japan) began paying tribute to the Chinese Emperor, who, in return, recognized him as sovereign.

    Chinese and Koreans migrated to the archipelago, forming entire clans like the Hata clan, consisting of Chinese descendants of the Qin dynasty, or the Takamuko clan. Korean princes were sent as hostages to the Japanese court in exchange for military support against the Manchu tribes.

    This influx of population had unforeseen consequences, notably introducing Buddhism to the archipelago and disrupting Japanese traditions.

    As the Yamato era concluded, Japan stood as a well-established empire, recognized by neighbors despite its distinct Shinto-based culture and political system. However, with the arrival of Buddhism and ensuing reforms, Japan entered its imperial period, commencing with the Asuka era.

    The Yamato court, which had its beginnings in the fifth century, grew into the imperial court of Japan during the next six centuries, becoming more dominant both domestically and internationally. It all started with a series of changes in the sixth and seventh centuries that completely altered the country’s political structure. During this period of imperial rule, the arts, cultural and spiritual traditions, and even the written language advanced, despite the fact that war was uncommon. Without a doubt, the six centuries between the beginning of the Heian period and the end of the Muromachi period were the Golden Age of the Empire of the Rising Sun, which became known as Japan during this time (Nihon). However, the shift between the Emperor’s ascension to power and his consolidation of that authority was characterized by a wave of changes that were essential to the Empire’s survival.

    Shōtoku Taishi’s Reforms (587–628)

    At the beginning of the 6th century, the Yamato court was the scene of intense political intrigue. Little by little, the Soga clan, thanks to its marriage to the imperial family, succeeded in establishing itself, pushing aside the Katsuraki, Heguri, and Koze clans, and above all, to the detriment of the Mononobe and Nakatomi clans, who contested the establishment of Buddhism. But we’ll come back to this later.

    By 587, the Soga clan was sufficiently powerful to allow its leader, Soga no Umako, to install his nephew on the throne and rule through this straw man (or rather child), with the help of prince regent Shotoku Taishi (574-622). Later, the emperor, showing too much inclination towards independence, was assassinated and replaced by Empress Suiko (593-628). Shotoku Taishi was the first to introduce reform.

    A devout Buddhist and a great connoisseur of Chinese literature, he drew inspiration from the Confucian principles governing government in the Middle Kingdom and applied them to Japanese reality. Shotoku Taishi introduced the concept of the Mandate of Heaven, according to which the Emperor holds his power by divine right and reigns according to the will of heaven. He also drew up a seventeen-article constitution, emphasizing the value of harmony and the Buddha’s teachings, the absolute priority of imperial orders over all other considerations, and praising the Confucian virtues of devotion and obedience.

    This “constitution”—a  debatable term, given that it does not really lay down the institutional foundations of the state but rather its guiding principles in moral and spiritual terms—is accompanied by a revolution in the system of ranks and etiquette, which, however laughable it may seem from the outside, is of major importance in a highly ritualized political system.

    To complete the “Sinicization” of Japan, Buddhist temples were built, the Chinese calendar was adopted, and a new administrative unit inspired by the Chinese model came into force, the Gokishichido (5 cities, 7 roads). Students and diplomatic missions were sent to China, then under the rule of the Tang dynasty. However, although relations were more regular and intense, particularly on a cultural level, than during the Kofûn period, it was also at this time that rivalries between China and Japan developed. Indeed, messages from the Emperor of the Rising Sun to the Emperor of the Middle are now addressed as equals, as Japan no longer considers itself a vassal of its Chinese neighbor.

    By the time Shotoku Taishi and Soga no Umako died, leaving the Soga clan to pull the strings of an Empire, Chinese culture had permeated Japanese customs and politics. Regarded with suspicion by the people, particularly Buddhist rites, these traditions from elsewhere were nevertheless to become an important part of the unique culture developed by Japan over the centuries that followed.

    The Taika Reforms

    The Soga clan, despite its period of success, did not survive long after the death of Shotoku Taishi. In the year 645, palace intrigues led to a coup d’état aimed at ending Soga’s grip on power. The Isshi Incident, also known as the Naka no Oe Uprising and Nakatomi no Kamatari (the clan that would later become the Fujiwara clan), signaled the start of the Taika Reforms, which means “Great Change.”

    As control was no longer inherited, the central government initially confiscated land. Each generation, the lands were handed over to the imperial administration, responsible for their redistribution. Naturally, this meant that a family losing imperial favor could be reduced to nothing at a moment’s notice. Similarly, the hereditary titles of clan leaders were also deprived of hereditary transmission.

    Subsequently, taxes on crops, silk, fabrics, and cotton were imposed to finance the expansion of the administration. A labor duty was instituted for the creation of a militia and the construction of public buildings. Finally, the division into Gokishichido was abolished, and the country was divided into provinces, led by governors accountable only to the imperial administration. Districts and townships were established to exert even more control over the country’s administration.

    Additionally, the Emperor and his supporters, particularly the Kamatari, focused on establishing the ritsuryo, a set of penal and administrative rules. The ritsuryo was written in several stages: the Ômi code, the first version, was completed in 668; the Asuka Kiyomihara code in 689; and the latest version, the Taihô code, completed in 701, remained in effect with minor modifications until 1868. The penal code resembled a Confucian code, favoring lighter punishments over severe penalties.

    The administrative code established the Jingi-kan, a body dedicated to court rituals and Shinto traditions, and the Daijo-kan, which created eight ministries for central administration, ceremonies, the imperial household, civil affairs, justice, the military, public affairs, and the treasury. This highly effective tool strengthened the imperial house’s ability to govern the country, contributing to the stabilization of its power.

    The Introduction of Buddhism in Japan

    The introduction of Buddhism to Japan likely occurred through immigration from the Korean Peninsula. In the 6th century, close relations between the Yamato court and Korean kingdoms developed, particularly after Japan’s intervention to support the Baekje kingdom against Mongol invaders. In 538, the first delegation was sent to Japan to spread the Buddhist faith. Initially embraced by the Soga clan and subsequently transmitted to the aristocracy, Buddhism faced resistance from the common people, supported by the Nakatomi and Mononobe clans.

    As Buddhist traditions gained ground, Shinto traditions declined. Imperial decree forbade the burials known as “kofun,” or keyhole-shaped tumuli. The consumption of meat, including horses, birds, and dogs, was also forbidden.

    Moreover, Buddhism was not the sole philosophy to make its way to the archipelago. In the mid-7th century, the first Japanese Taoist monastery was built on Mount Tonomine. Some imperial burials adopted the octagonal shape, symbolizing universal order in Taoism and indicating the strength of its influence.

    As the Asuka period concluded, the empire was firmly established, with clans and the populace devoted; political stability prevailed; and the archipelago remained unscarred by conflicts. Such prosperity led the Japanese Empire to view itself as equal to the Middle Kingdom. A real cultural flowering was about to take place in what is now known as the Empire of the Rising Sun.

    The Nara era commenced with the establishment, in the year 710 CE, of Japan’s first permanent capital in the city of Nara, located in the central part of the country. The Asuka era reforms gave rise to an imperial bureaucracy, which also settled in Nara. Rapidly, the city became Japan’s primary urban center, hosting a population of 200,000 people.

    This urbanization, bringing together thinkers and artists from across the country, facilitated a genuine cultural explosion. During this period, imported Chinese culture associated with Buddhism waned, despite the capital being planned similarly to the Chinese Tang Dynasty capital, and was replaced by an original Japanese culture. Concurrently, the permanence of the imperial court heightened palace intrigues and power struggles. While the Nara and Heian eras are synonymous with cultural blossoming in Japan, they are also inseparable from the decline of imperial power and the onset of the first clan wars.

    Development of Japanese Arts and Culture

    The first sign of cultural renewal is the abandonment, starting in 710, of the titles and court attire of the Chinese tradition. Beauty standards evolve, and both aristocratic men and women powder their faces to whiten their skin and blacken their teeth. Men adopt the practice of wearing a thin mustache, while women paint their lips scarlet, all in an effort to approach the divine “perfection” described in Shinto pantheon legends. The first complex court robes also make their appearance, known as “junihitoe,” consisting of multiple layers of fabrics arranged according to a complex code based on the season and sacred festivals.

    Artistically, the major development of these two eras was undoubtedly literary. Although Chinese remained the court language, the emergence of “kanas”—characters  designed to express nuances, typically Japanese—led to an explosion of literature. The first major works emerged at the beginning of the Nara era, with the Kojiki (712) and the Nihon Shoki (724), the first imperial chronicles. Later, fictional works such as the famous Tale of Genji, the first Japanese novel, and The Pillow Book by Sei Shonagon, one of the earliest female authors, were written. Poetry also experienced impressive growth. Japanese poems, known as waka, flourished during this time, as being a poet was a mark of an enlightened and serene spirit. Fujiwara no Teika, Murasaki Shikibu, and Saigyo are among the famous poets.

    To fully grasp the significance of literary creations during this period, the current national anthem of Japan, “Kimi Ga Yo,” was written during the early Heian era, around 800.

    Buddhism in the Empire of the Rising Sun

    During the Nara period in Japan, as Chinese traditions fell into disuse and the Tang dynasty’s court was considered decadent, Buddhism, imported from China, did not follow the same decline. Well-established in the archipelago, the Buddhist clergy engaged in a rapid process of adaptation to Japanese reality. Despite being closely connected to the emperors and empresses of Nara, this adaptation did not occur without posing some challenges.

    At the beginning of the Nara era, Buddhism gained significant prominence. A vast monastic complex, the Todaiji temple, was constructed with a colossal bronze statue of Buddha at its center, known as Daibutsu, towering over 16 meters in height. Assimilated to the representation of the Sun Goddess, Amaterasu, this statue synthesized Buddhism from the continent with the older traditions of Shinto, native to Japan. Still visible in Nara, it remains a highly esteemed monument for both Japanese and foreign tourists. Provincial temples, called kokubunji, were established to extend the influence of Buddhism to rural regions where Shinto still held strong roots.

    The archipelago’s oldest monasteries also date back to this period, such as the grand monastery on Mount Hiei, built by the Tendai Buddhist sect, closely associated with the emperor and basing its doctrine on the Lotus Sutra. Cultural achievements and artistic works from the Buddhist world found their way to Japan, notably the Shoso-in temple, which archived sacred texts from as far back as the early caravanserais of Central Asia on the Silk Road. The development of religious art played a crucial role in Buddhism’s influence in Japan, encompassing silk paintings, Buddhist statues, temple decorations (mandalas), sculpture, and calligraphy.

    Buddhism: State Religion? No, but…

    During the Heian period in Japan, Buddhism ceased to be the state religion but remained a means for the imperial family to uphold and expand its power and influence. Empress Kôken (749–758) invited a large number of Buddhist priests to the court during her reign. Even after her abdication in 758, she maintained strong ties with the clergy, particularly with a priest named Dokyô. When her cousin Nakamaro of Fujiwara rebelled against her, she successfully defeated him, subsequently dethroning the reigning emperor and ascending to the throne as Empress Shotoku (764–770). These actions shocked the court and led to the exclusion of women from the succession line. The clergy’s involvement is evident, as the empress, in gratitude for her victory, had nearly a million wooden charms manufactured.

    In the later Heian era, the Tendai and Kukai Buddhist sects garnered support from numerous aristocrats, including Emperor Kammu, a staunch admirer of Tendai. Both sects aimed to connect the clergy and the state, believing that their religious conduct required influencing political decisions. During this period, the clergy’s land holdings grew in importance. Enjoying tax exemptions due to their religious status, monasteries also caused significant financial losses, threatening the imperial administration’s financial stability.

    While there was a cultural explosion during the Nara period and the early Heian era, which was characterized by the development of modern Japanese writing and the influence of Buddhism, cracks started to appear during what appeared to be the heyday of imperial power. These fissures persisted throughout the Heian era, ultimately leading to the fall of the Empire and the rise of the shogunate.

    The transition from the Nara era to the Heian era, though seemingly inconspicuous, carried significant implications. In 794, the capital was once again moved, this time from Nara to Kyoto (then known as Heian-kyô). Built on a larger scale but following the same plan as Nara, Kyoto stood as a monumental symbol of the imperial era’s flourishing.

    Emperor Kammu chose Kyoto to strengthen the seat of imperial power, considering its better access to the sea, a river route, and, most importantly, its proximity to the eastern provinces. By establishing the government’s seat there, Kammu aimed to make it a strong power center that would extend imperial dominance across the archipelago. Military victories in the northeastern part of Honshu marked an initial step toward success, but the seeds of the decline of imperial authority were already present.

    The Fujiwara Regency

    Emperor Kammu, who seemed to be leading the Empire towards power, died in 806, leaving behind a powerful throne but a disputed succession. At exactly the same time, the great noble families began to regain their lost power from the reforms of the sixth century. Farmers and independent peasants who owned their own land since these reforms found it more advantageous to sell their property titles to these families. They would then work on these lands as sharecroppers in exchange for a fraction of the harvest. The result of this trend was that the extent of land controlled by the nobles was rapidly expanding. These lands formed “shōen,” large parcels, overseen by a manor or a castle.

    This was somewhat reminiscent of the existing feudal system in Europe, except that the peasants were not serfs tied to their land. Furthermore, while peasants could not escape the controls on their heritage and tax collection, the great noble families were politically powerful enough to obtain substantial reductions in their taxes. A similar situation existed for monastic institutions. Monasteries also began to form shōen, becoming a significant factor in the country’s economy.

    Gradually, emperors lost the absolute control they had over the administration as the Empire’s financial resources dwindled. The Fujiwara family, one of the most powerful noble families in Japan, which owned immense cultivable areas in the north of the country, gradually approached the seat of power, particularly through marriages with the imperial family. During the ninth century, the Fujiwara took the lead in the Imperial Cabinet, and several of them assumed the role of regent. The management of the Empire’s affairs gradually fell under the control of their family administration, which also managed their land holdings. The Fujiwara family surpassed imperial officials at all levels.

    While other clans did not have an administrative machine as extensive as the Fujiwara, they nevertheless developed their own administration. The foundations of the feudal system were already in place.

    The Rise of the Military Class

    As the finances of the Empire collapsed, maintaining a substantial imperial army became increasingly problematic. Gradually, the management of military affairs became as much, if not more, the responsibility of noble families than the imperial administration. The shōen, in fact, were both the reason and the means to develop armed forces: they enabled the payment and sustenance of troops, who, among other duties, defended against raiders and the incursions of the Emishi (tribes in northern Japan). Private militias, whether under the command of noble families or religious orders, marked the emergence of a new social class—the warriors (bushi), later known as samurai (those who serve).

    The larger families, controlling more extensive lands, also possessed the most numerous armies and consequently received military titles and corresponding prestige from the imperial court. Clans such as Taira, Fujiwara, and Minamoto, in particular, took center stage in the military arena. A tense situation developed, with each clan wary of the others, yet none taking the initiative for open conflict. Eventually, the balance was disrupted by Emperor Go-Sanjô (1068–1073).

    Unlike several of his predecessors, Emperor Go-Sanjô managed to diminish the power of the Fujiwara. He established an official land registry, and as a significant portion of Fujiwara lands had not been properly recorded with authorities after being acquired from small landowners, the Fujiwara clan lost a substantial portion of its lands and income.

    The Hôgen Rebellion (1156), supported by the Taira and Minamoto, further dispossessed the Fujiwara of their dominant position, compelling them to retreat to their northern strongholds. While they retained their official positions, the Emperor regained control of the administration, establishing an imperial council composed of abdicated emperors. Internal divisions within the clan accelerated its decline. For the first time, a war had brought an end to the power of a major clan.

    The Genpei War, 1180–1185

    Minamoto no Yoritomo, from an 1179 hanging scroll by Fujiwara no Takanobu.
    Minamoto no Yoritomo, from an 1179 hanging scroll by Fujiwara no Takanobu.

    The Gempei War was Japan’s first true civil war, and it occurred shortly after the collapse of the Fujiwara, a family that had been pushed to the political outside. From 1180 on, this one battled against the Minamoto and Taira dynasties. There were indicators of an impending big battle going back many decades. The Minamoto initially rebelled against Taira rule of the imperial court in 1160, during the Heiji rebellion, but were soon put down.

    The Taira clan, led by the legendary Taira no Kiyomori, controlled imperial politics during the period. He had the nerve to become clan chief and then seize control of modern-day Kobe, the hub of the busiest commerce route between Song China and Kyoto, the imperial capital. Because of this, he was able to provide a comfortable lifestyle for his loved ones while still advancing his career and gaining influence. Kiyomori created and unmade monarchs (Nijo, Rokujo, Takaku) as he pleased in his role as Daijo Daijin (Chief Minister of the government, second in power only to the Emperor) and administrator of the Empire.

    By doing so, the Taira earned the enmity of many in the court who were envious of their authority. Assisted by the Minamoto family, Prince Mochihito, brother of the deposed Emperor Gosanjo, started the war in an effort to end the Taira dynasty’s rule. When Mochihito issued a summons to arms, the latter responded by relocating the capital to Fukuhara (current-day Kobe), which was inside the center of their fief.

    In the summer of 1180, troops from both families converged, and in the first fight, at Uji, the Minamoto were utterly defeated. Despite the assistance of the warrior-monks of the Mount Hiei monasteries, Prince Mochihito and the Minamoto clan chief, Minamoto no Yorimosa, were both slaughtered. The Taira forces besieged and ultimately destroyed most of these monasteries. The Minamoto were beaten for the second time on September 14, 1180, in Ishibashiyama, and so they withdrew to their seaside stronghold of Kamakura. Taira no Kiyomori passed away in February of the following year, putting his youngest son in line to become shogun. With both forces separated by hundreds of kilometers and experiencing supply issues due to weak crops, fighting froze in the spring of 1181.

    After two years of doing nothing, the army resumed its advance in the spring of 1183. Although the Minamoto were unprepared and their warriors were untrained, the Taira were nonetheless totally destroyed by them at Kurikara. With time, the Taira were unable to escape Kyoto and were forced to retreat to their homelands in western Honshu and Shikoku. Infighting between Yoshinaka and Yoshitsune, two members of the Minamoto family, over who would rule the clan meant that the Taira never fully recovered from the catastrophes of 1183.

    Battle of Ichi-no-Tani folding screen
    Battle of Ichi-no-Tani folding screen.

    After besieging Ichi no Tani and Dan no ura, they were eventually defeated in the naval battle of Shimonoseki in the Inland Sea. After the Taira family was annihilated, the Kamakura Shogunate took power. The chief of the Minamoto clan became Japan’s military dictator, known as the Shogun. As a result of this conflict, the emperors were demoted to the role of symbolic figures, while the shogun assumed practical control for the next 500 years. The samurai emerged as Japan’s new elite class when the country entered its feudal period.

    Battle of Dan-no-ura
    Battle of Dan-no-ura.

    In 1185, the Minamoto clan triumphed over the Taira clan and became the dominant family in the Japanese archipelago. The Taira family’s former dominance and influence over the government were history. However, the war proved the superiority of military might over imperial control. For a long time, samurai were seen as little more than powerless slaves, but over time, they started to establish a warrior caste and assume more responsibilities. Shortly after the Minamoto triumph, the imperial court reinforced this status quo by bestowing upon Minamoto no Yoritomo the title of Seii Tai Shogun, therefore vesting absolute authority in him.

    Emergence of the Samurai: The Kamakura Period (1185–1333)

    A Japanese painting on silk in a traditional style of a Samurai warrior riding a horse. Image: Pinterest.
    A Japanese painting on silk in a traditional style of a Samurai warrior riding a horse. Image: Pinterest.

    The Kamakura era began in 1185, when Minamoto no Yoritomo, the first shogun in centuries, established the seat of his so-called bakufu government (tent government, in reference to the fact that military chiefs held power there) in Kamakura, some 50 kilometers from present-day Tokyo. As with any new regime, Yoritomo’s first priority was to consolidate his power. He created three ministries essential to the governance of the state. The first dealt with finance and administration. The second dispensed justice in times of peace and organized the raising of troops from the shogun’s vassals in times of war. The latter ensured that the shogun’s decisions were implemented.

    The Kamakura shogunate’s other source of power came from the lands under its control. After the defeat of the Taira, much of the land in central and western Japan came under Minamoto’s control via confiscation. The Minamotos then distributed these lands among those who would become their vassals, thereby securing their loyalty. This was the birth of the feudal system and of the samurai caste, made up of landowners and their vassals who had sworn loyalty and fought for their lord.

    As he established this new system, Yoritomo found himself fighting against those who resisted these changes. The Fujiwara clan, which owned most of the land in northern Japan, was deeply rooted in traditional values. They saw the Minamotos as upstarts who endangered imperial power itself. Moreover, the Fujiwara refused to be accountable to those they saw as rivals. Eventually, the situation degenerated into a new civil war, much faster than the previous one, which ended in 1189 with the defeat of Fujiwara no Yasuhira and the end of Fujiwara’s power, which never recovered.

    When Yoritomo died ten years later, in 1199, Japan’s political landscape was unrecognizable. While the old imperial court remained in Kyoto, the new Minamoto vassal landowning families had regrouped at the Kamakura court. For the first time, there were two true centers of power in Japan. But, Yoritomo’s death was also the beginning of the end for the Minamotos.

    The internal dissension that had already manifested itself during the war against the Taira resumed with a vengeance. His son Yoriie succeeded him as head of the clan but proved unable to maintain Minamoto’s hold on the shogunate. In the early years of the 13th century, a warrior clan, the Hôjô, seized the post of Regent (Shikken) and created the posts of Tokuso and Renshô, titles that were normally honorary but which they used to strip the Minamoto shogun of his prerogatives. The Hôjo were, de facto, the new masters of shogunal power.

    Although the position of the shogun had been created in honor of those who defended imperial power, the shogun had gradually come to encroach on the emperor’s power. In 1221, Emperor Gô-Toba declared the second Hojo regent, Yoshitoki, an outlaw and went to war against the shogunate. The Hojo clan and its allies crushed the imperial forces in less than a month, exiling Gô-Toba and his sons. This revolt, known as the Jokyû Incident, marked the end of imperial power, with the emperor reduced to a symbolic role.

    The Hojo kings established the Council of State in 1225, a new political structure where the other lords shared legislative and judicial authority. This sharing of power in no way diminished the importance of the shogun and regent and enabled them to give other clans the opportunity to exercise a share of power, reducing the risk of a coup d’état. In 1232, a new legal code was established. Unlike the rules in force until then, which were based entirely on the theories of Confucius, this code, the Goseibai Shikimoku, focused on the creation of laws and precise punishments according to crimes and was devoid of any philosophical scope while being much clearer and more practical to use.

    The Hojo regents maintained absolute authority for around fifty years. Until the first Mongol invasion of Japan in 1274… In 1268, the Mongols, under Kublai Khan, created the Yuan dynasty and began ruling China. The latter desired to include Japan among his vassal states and hence issued an ultimatum demanding that Japan surrender and pay tribute. The Hojo regents promptly rejected the ultimatum. In 1274, about 23,000 Mongols, Chinese, and Koreans arrived on the northern part of Kyushu in a fleet of 600 ships, armed with grenades that had never been seen in Japan before.

    The samurai quickly lost ground, unaccustomed to the group formations employed by the Mongol officers. However, a typhoon ravaged the Mongol fleet less than a day after landing. In 1281, Kublai Khan launched a second invasion, but the fleet was once again wiped out by a typhoon after an apparently successful landing and a few weeks of fighting in Kyushu. Japanese Shinto priests called these typhoons the kamikaze, the divine winds that come to defend Japan against foreign invaders.

    However, typhoons were probably not the only cause of Kublai’s defeat. The remains of ships found at the site show many defects. It is thought that Chinese and Korean shipbuilders, hoping to shake off the Mongol yoke, built vessels adapted to river navigation, not to the high seas, let alone storms. As a result, many ships sank where ships with more suitable hulls would have resisted.

    The invasions had not left the archipelago unscathed. The financial cost of raising troops and preparing for defense had led to new taxes, and the Hojo regency was becoming less and less popular. To make matters worse, bands of ronin, masterless samurai who resorted to brigandage to survive, began wreaking havoc across the country. To avoid the worst, the Hojo further weakened imperial power by creating a second court. The Northern and Southern Courts, from two different branches of the imperial family, were supposed to rule alternately, thus further reducing the emperor’s remaining influence.

    While this solution worked for a few decades, in 1331, Emperor Go-Daigo of the Southern Court ascended the throne, intent on ridding himself of the Hojo regents and the shogunate. The Hojo clashed with forces loyal to the emperor but were defeated by the treachery of the Ashikaga family, led by Takauji, which led to the dispersion and subsequent rout of the shogunate forces. In 1333, Emperor Go-Daigo re-established imperial power for a brief period known as the Kemmu Restoration.

    The Kenmu Restoration (1333–1336)

    Go-Daigo’s main goal—to retake control from the shogunate and effectively rule Kamakura without interference from the military—is now possible thanks to the success of his uprising. However, the Kemmu Restoration was short-lived, primarily due to a strategic error on the emperor’s part. He believed he had the support of a significant portion of the samurai class and the so-called “loyalist” military clans and families. In reality, these loyalist samurai and clans had not engaged in the revolt to support the emperor but rather to end the Hojo domination. Consequently, after the emperor’s restoration as the true leader, Go-Daigo neglected to reward his allies, assuming their allegiance. By failing to compensate the samurai, he lost their support, leading to new disturbances in the country.

    Simultaneously, the majority of the warrior class is discontented with what they perceive as ingratitude, and the major military families are concerned about the emperor’s initiatives to establish a civilian-dominated power. Violent political clashes ensue, particularly between Prince Morinaga, the emperor’s descendant, and Takauji, the leader of the Ashikaga clan, each vying to place their followers in strategic positions. Gradually, Takauji manages to distinguish himself as the leader and representative of the samurai. Eventually, he imprisoned Morinaga on charges of treason in Kamakura in 1335.

    In that year, an unexpected event provided Takauji with the opportunity he needed. A survivor of the Hojo regency, Tokiyuki, revolted and temporarily regained control of Kamakura. Before leaving, the Ashikaga-appointed governor ordered Morinaga’s execution, shifting the blame onto the Hojo. Takauji then asked the emperor to grant him the title of shogun to quell the rebellion. Despite Go-Daigo’s disagreement, Takauji left Kyoto for Kamakura and ended the Hojo revolt. When the emperor ordered him to return, he refused, signaling that Takauji and the Ashikaga were rejecting the emperor’s authority, leading to the secession of the Kamakura region.

    Swiftly, an imperial army assembled to defeat the Ashikaga, while a second army marched towards Kamakura to aid its defense. On November 17, 1335, Takauji’s brother sent messages throughout the country, calling on all samurai to defend the Ashikaga against the emperor’s tyranny. Simultaneously, the imperial court urged the samurai to help defeat the Ashikaga rebels.

    When the actual war began, most samurai were convinced that Takauji Ashikaga was the leader they needed to assert their interests. With a significant numerical advantage, Ashikaga forces defeated the imperial armies, and on February 25, 1336, Takauji entered Kyoto, putting an end to the Kemmu Restoration.

    The Muromachi Period (1337–1573)

    After more than a year of debates and dissensions, Takauji Ashikaga was finally appointed Shogun in 1337. The Ashikaga shoguns maintained their reign for nearly 250 years, until 1573. This period was named Muromachi, after the district where the shoguns’ palace was located. It was relocated back to Kyoto in 1378 by the third Ashikaga shogun. This geographical proximity aimed to exert much tighter control over the imperial court. While the Kamakura shogunate had never truly eradicated imperial power, the Ashikaga went so far as to destroy the notion that the Emperor should reign directly, making the position of Shogun indispensable for the Empire’s proper functioning.

    Under the Kamakura shoguns, the governor’s position was merely that of an agent acting on behalf of the shogun. However, at the beginning of the Muromachi era, it became synonymous with extended powers, gaining almost complete control over the lands they ruled, answering only to the shogun. These lords, called daimyos, quickly became the most powerful political figures in the Empire directly after the shogunal court.

    In 1392, the Ashikaga also reunified the separated Imperial Court under the Hojo regency, another measure to control imperial power more easily. Eventually, it was the rise of the shoguns that led to the decline of the Ashikaga, to the point where the daimyos could directly support certain candidates for imperial succession, facilitating the ascent to the throne of emperors favoring their interests, generally to the detriment of the Shogun. From the fourth Ashikaga shogun onward, the influence of the shoguns slowly declined, along with their prestige.

    Officially, the Ashikaga remained in power until 1573, but long before their fall, signs of their decay became increasingly visible. The Ônin War, between 1467 and 1477, triggered by a dispute over imperial succession, marked the beginning of a previously unknown period of turmoil in Japan. A period of civil war where every family and every clan defended only their own interests plunged the country into chaos.

    This troubled period is known as Sengoku-jidai, the age of warring states.

    1477: Japan is in complete chaos. The Ônin War has just ended, but the troubles do not subside. The Ashikaga dynasty, which has been ruling the country on behalf of the Emperor with the title of Seishi Taishogun since 1337, is losing its grip and proves incapable of ending conflicts that emerge everywhere in the country among the dozens of noble families and clans. Japan gradually lost its cohesion, sinking into one of the most turbulent periods in its history, the Sengoku-jidai (a time of unprecedented upheaval and transformations), the era of warring states.

    Nanban and Gunpowder

    In 1543, a typhoon off the coast of Tanegashima, in southern Japan, kidnapped a ship full of Portuguese sailors and brought them to the Japanese islands. There was a profound shock since the Japanese had never before had any meaningful interaction with European cultures. The Portuguese were referred to as “Nanban” by the Japanese. This term translates to “Southern Barbarians.”

    Despite an embargo placed by the Emperor of China in retribution for Japanese piracy, the Portuguese started importing Chinese commodities, notably silk, into Japan within a few years. Eventually, business picked up speed. The port of Nagasaki opened as a commercial station in 1571, and commerce with the Portuguese increased rapidly. Shortly later, in 1578, the daimyo of the Sumitada clan requested Portuguese aid in fending off an assault on the daimyo, and in return, the port was permanently surrendered to the Jesuits.

    To Japan next came the Dutch in the year 1600. The competition with the Portuguese for control of commerce with the Land of the Rising Sun was severe.

    There were two key shifts that the introduction of Westerners to Japan brought about. One of the causes was technical. Gunpowder’s use in Japanese military operations was nascent in 1543. The intention behind this seemingly minor innovation was to dramatically shift the power dynamic. Suddenly, families armed with Portuguese arquebuses could compete with their more formidable neighbors.

    The availability of such weapons also contributed to the escalation of hostilities. Fighting broke out on the southern island of Kyushu when the Portuguese arrived, and it wasn’t until later that harquebuses became commonplace across the archipelago. They were dubbed Tanegashima after the island where the Nanban had their first encounter. By 1560, harquebuses were widely used in warfare.

    The harquebuses were not the only thing the Westerners brought with them, though; the Christian faith was also a major contributor to tensions. Six years after the first meeting, Nagazaki built its first church. The founder of the Jesuits, the Catholic Church’s missionary arm, set his sights on Japan in an effort to win over the local population. In under 30 years, the majority of the daimyo in Kyushu and more than 130,000 other Japanese were converted.

    Christianity flourished across Japan, from the lowest of the low to the highest of the high, despite the social boundaries that existed between the various classes. While some daimyo were willing to accept Buddhism without investigation, others were suspicious of the new faith, believing it was being utilized by the Nanban to penetrate Japan. Christian and non-Christian daimyos began fighting with one another.

    Gekokujo: The Powerful Are Defeated by the Humble

    The clan wars tearing apart the country witnessed unprecedented events. The ancient, powerful, and respected clans, along with their leaders, who, according to the Japanese social system, are masters of their vassals, are gradually losing ground to dynamic new clans and ambitious leaders. The established order is shattered by internal rivalries, and those who, in times of peace, would have submitted to the will of dominant families now struggle to take the lead. This phenomenon is known as Gekokujo, roughly translated as “the humble overcome the powerful.”

    As a result, the war rapidly degenerates, occurring not only between clans but also within clans. Various families and branches within the clan vie for control. In the Echigo region, north of Kyoto, on the coast of the Sea of Japan, peasants and commoners rise up following the Ikko-ikki religious movement (a Buddhist school of the “Pure Land”) and assert their independence. They receive support from the minor nobility and rōnins, the samurai left masterless by the war.

    In the province of Iga (Skull Valley), villagers free themselves from the grip of feudal lords, establishing a league (ikki) comprised of peasants, rōnins, and the clergy to defend against external aggressors. The region is notably renowned for its ninja clans.

    In summary, this phenomenon, accelerating the decomposition of the country into rival factions, also presents a unique opportunity to end the social stagnation that led to the decline of the Ashikaga dynasty.

    The Unification of Japan: Oda Nobunaga (1534–1582)

    Oda Nobunaga in a 16th-century portrait by Kanō Motohide (detail)
    Oda Nobunaga in a 16th-century portrait by Kanō Motohide (detail).

    During this turbulent period, three ambitious and skilled men emerged to reunify Japan under a single banner. The first among them took the lead of the Oda clan in 1551, a minor clan in the Owari province in central Japan. His name was Oda Nobunaga.

    At that time, the Oda clan was in a precarious situation, being a vassal of Shiba Yoshimune, the governor of the province, and divided into several factions. With the support of Yoshimune and one of his younger brothers, Oda Nobumitsu, Nobunaga managed to overcome the opposition of Nobutomo, another brother who assassinated Yoshimune to deprive Nobunaga of support. Nobunaga eventually got rid of his brother and rival in Kiyosu, then used Yoshimune’s son as a puppet to form an alliance with a powerful neighboring clan, the Imagawa. After eight years of conflict and the elimination of another brother, Oda Nobunaga finally succeeded in unifying the Owari province under his leadership in 1559.

    The following year, he had to defend against an incursion by the Imagawa, who marched with 25,000 men towards Kyoto, while Nobunaga could only muster 3,000. Against all expectations and the advice of his counselors, Nobunaga attacked the Imagawa forces, using straw dummies and the cover of a providential storm to sow chaos among his enemies. This was the Battle of Okehazama, during which the Imagawa general was killed. The Imagawa quickly lost their position, and Nobunaga took the opportunity to ally with one of their former vassals, the Mitsudaira, in 1561.

    Between 1561 and 1567, he focused on seizing the neighboring Mino province, diverting the vassals of the Saito clan from their master before launching a lightning campaign that swept away the Saito in a few months. After this victory, he changed his personal seal to “Tenka Fubu,” meaning: Unify the nation with military might.

    In 1568, at the request of a member of the Ashikaga family, Nobunaga set out to conquer Kyoto, quickly driving the Miyoshi clan out of the city and making Ashikaga Yoshiaki the 15th Ashikaga shogun. Almost immediately, Nobunaga began to restrict the shogun’s powers, thereby increasing his own power and making it clear to the daimyo that he intended to use the shogun as a puppet.

    Later Hōjō era's Odawara Castle.
    Later Hōjō era’s Odawara Castle. Image: Wikimedia.

    This bold move was too much for Nobunaga’s rivals. Led by the Asakura, former masters of the Oda, the Asai, and the Ikko-ikki launched a concerted aggression against the Oda clan, inflicting heavy losses. Eventually, with the help of their allies, the Tokugawa (formerly Mitsudaira), the Oda counterattacked, breaking the Asai and Asakura armies at the Battle of Anegawa. Subsequently, Nobunaga, known at the time for his Christian sympathies, dealt with the Buddhist uprising against him. He burned the Enryaku-ji temple in 1571 and besieged the Nagashima fortress. Eventually, the struggle against the Ikkō-ikki Buddhists cost him several thousand soldiers and two brothers, and he finally set fire to the castle in 1574, ending the resistance.

    Meanwhile, as Nobunaga was entangled on his western flank, the Takeda clan seized the opportunity to attack from the east, starting by invading Tokugawa lands, defeated at the Battle of Mikatagahara in 1573. The Tokugawa managed to slow down the Takeda by organizing night raids, and after the death of Takeda Shingen, the Takeda retreated. At the same time, the Oda completed the conquest of the Asai and Asakura clans.

    In 1574, Nobunaga turned to the east and, with the Tokugawa, invaded the Takeda clan’s lands, reducing the entire Takeda forces to nothingness at the Battle of Nagashino, thanks in part to the innovative use of arquebusiers arranged in a triple line of fire for continuous shooting. The Takeda never recovered from this defeat.

    For three years, Nobunaga consolidated his positions, but the Mori to the west broke the naval blockade of the surviving Buddhist castle at Igashiyama. In 1577, the future Toyotomi Hideyoshi, Nobunaga’s lieutenant, was sent to attack the Mori clan. The Uesugi clan, under the leadership of Uesugi Kenshin, gathered northern clans to attack the Oda that same year, resulting in a crushing defeat at Tedorigawa. Only Kenshin’s death ended the second anti-Oda coalition.

    In 1582, Nobunaga controlled half of Japan, including Kyoto. The conquest of the Mori continued, and the northern clans could no longer offer credible resistance. Nobunaga fell victim to a coup that Mitsuhide, one of his lieutenants, orchestrated while he was traveling to the western front. Mitsuhide’s troops surrounded the Honno-ji temple where he was staying, killing Nobunaga and his eldest son, casting doubt on the succession.

    Toyotomi Hideyoshi (1536/37–1598)

    Toyotomi Hideyoshi
    Toyotomi Hideyoshi..

    After the death of Nobunaga, the situation was chaotic. Hashiba Hideyoshi emerged to quell the rekindled chaos. This former lieutenant of Nobunaga, the son of the ashigaru (peasant class), initially served Nobunaga as a sandal-bearer, a very low-ranking servant.

    At the Battle of Okehazama, Nobunaga noticed him and became interested in his sharp-witted servant. In 1564, Hideyoshi was sent to rally deserters from the Saito clan to the Oda cause. In 1567, the Battle of Inabayama was won thanks to Hideyoshi’s idea to flood the valley where the castle was built. In 1573, Nobunaga made him the daimyo of a fief in North Omi, and Hideyoshi continued to faithfully serve Nobunaga, leading a war against the Mori clan between 1577 and 1582.

    Upon learning of Nobunaga’s death due to Mitsuhide’s betrayal, Hideyoshi immediately negotiated a peace treaty with the Mori and turned his forces against the traitors at the Battle of Yamazaki. After avenging his master, it was time to organize Nobunaga’s succession at the Kiyosu meeting. With his eldest son dead, several candidates vied for succession: Oda Nobutaka, Oda Nobukatsu, and Oda Hidenobu. Hideyoshi chose to support the latter, with the help of two of the three Oda clan advisors. Through two swift victories, he eliminated Shibata Katsuie, Nobutaka’s advocate, and established a status quo with the Tokugawa defending Nobukatsu.

    Once his candidate was installed as the head of the Oda clan, Hideyoshi began strengthening his grip, starting the construction of his own fortress, Osaka Castle, in 1583. During this relatively calm period, he was officially adopted by the regent family of Fujiwara, receiving the title of Kampaku (“regent”) and the name Toyotomi.

    Taking advantage of his dominant position, Hideyoshi launched a conquest of the South, gaining control of Southern Honshu and overthrowing the Chosokabe clan’s dominance on Shikoku. In 1587, he landed in Kyushu and, strongly opposing the spread of Christianity, banned missionaries from the island. To prevent the formation of new leagues (or ikki), he prohibited peasants and commoners from carrying weapons, initiating what was later called the sword hunt. Once his control was established in the South, Hideyoshi turned his attention to the East again, defeating the Hojo clan, the last major independent clan, at the Battle of Odawara. He then offered their Kanto lands to Tokugawa Ieyasu if the latter submitted, which he did. Hideyoshi became the master of a unified Japan.

    Unfortunately, his ambitions did not stop there. Now that the country was under his control, he contemplated invading Ming China, first securing control of Korea (Joseon at the time). When the Korean governors, vassals of the Emperor of China, rejected the proposed free passage agreements, he devised invasion plans starting in August 1591.

    In April 1592, Japanese troops landed on Korean soil, capturing Seoul without significant difficulty and undertaking the takeover of the country’s strategic points, dividing to achieve this goal as quickly as possible before China reacted. In four months, they had begun to force a route to Manchuria by spring 1593. However, a Chinese army counterattacked and pushed the Japanese back to Seoul, where the war bogged down.

    The quagmire of the Korean expedition destabilized Hideyoshi, and the birth of his first son in the same year sparked a succession dispute with his nephew, while the fierce repression of Christianity caused further troubles. A new invasion of Korea launched in 1598 failed miserably, and a plague epidemic ravaged the country, claiming Hideyoshi’s life on September 18, 1598. Once again, Japan was deprived of a leader.

    The Tokugawa Leyasu Period (1543–1616)

    Tokugawa Ieyasu
    Tokugawa Ieyasu.

    Tokugawa Ieyasu, a longstanding ally of the Oda, had taken up arms against Toyotomi Hideyoshi since the latter was not an ally but a competitor. As far back as 1584, when the Tokugawa supported Oda Nobukatsu over Hideyoshi’s candidate in the succession to Nobunaga, the Tokugawa had been at odds with Hideyoshi and his kin. Ieyasu’s son became Hideyoshi’s adopted child when the two leaders settled their differences and established a united government.

    While Hideyoshi consolidated power elsewhere in Japan, he made the Hojo stronghold of Kanto available to the Tokugawa in 1588. Quickly agreeing, Ieyasu saw the chance to extend his empire (from 5 to 8 provinces), while Hideyoshi wanted to undermine his competitor by relocating him to an area he did not control. Ieyasu won over the previous Hojo clan members and started constructing a new domain in Edo while patiently waiting for his opportunity.

    After Hideyoshi appointed him and four other counselors as regents for his son Hideyori, he served in this capacity until Hideyoshi’s death in 1598. After Maeda Toshiie, the most revered of the five regents, was killed, Ieyasu spent a year forging alliances with Hideyoshi’s erstwhile opponents and then marched on Osaka Castle, where Hideyori was hiding.

    Ishida Mitsunari rallied the other three regents to stand against him. It didn’t take long for the western army to become a clan that supported Hideyoshi and the eastern army to establish a clan that supported the Tokugawa clan. During the greatest battle in Japanese history in June of 1600, the Tokugawa clan marched north against the Uesugi clan and then west to counter the army marching to Fushimi, dividing its forces under the command of his son Hidetada. However, this secondary force fell behind along the Tokaido route and was therefore not present.

    Sekigahara battle
    Battle of Sekigahara.

    The Battle of Sekigahara took place on the 21st of October, 1600, and included around 160,000 troops. The battle was intense, but the Tokugawa ultimately broke through the western army’s right flank, resulting in a widespread defeat that allowed them to seize control of Japan and wipe out their competitors simultaneously. On April 24, 1603, after consolidating and solidifying his power, he was made shogun, marking the commencement of the last Japanese shogunate, which would continue for almost 250 years.

    References:

  • Hitler’s use of child soldiers in the Nazi regime

    Hitler’s use of child soldiers in the Nazi regime

    The National Socialists used war games and the militarization of mass groups to shape young minds. The Nazi leadership dispatched many young individuals who had been raised under National Socialism to the front lines, where many of them died. “Not alone did the English drop bombs, but they also dropped ration cards (…). leaflets included, and they’re the unpleasant kind. My faith is unmovable. God will be with us, and our cause will be just if A. Hitler can lead us to victory. I just can’t bring myself to be hateful of the English. They are Germans, too.”

    In spite of the bombing of Berlin and other towns and the bleak news from the Eastern Front, 15-year-old Liselotte’s belief in “Führer, folk, and fatherland” remained unshaken on August 28, 1943. These journal entries were written by a girl, reflecting her thoughts and feelings about the war from 1942 to 1945 through the lens of a child raised in a National Socialist society.

    After the Soviet loss at Stalingrad in February 1943, she wrote the following: “Germany is under severe distress now. Stalingrad. It’s sad enough to make you shed some tears. Still, I refuse to give in to weakness. That’s why we can’t afford to give up and admit defeat. The greatest of our German people have shed their blood at the front, and we dare not dishonor them in this way.” By November, however, the young people’s outlook had brightened once more: “Hitler gave me fresh optimism in triumph, he talked of landing in England and of retribution for the bombing horror.”

    The methods used by the Nazi government to brainwash its young citizens

    Diary entries like Liselotte’s show the extent to which the National Socialists were effective in indoctrinating and molding a generation of youngsters and young adults in accordance with their ideological ideals. A whole generation’s worth of kids grew up learning and believing in National Socialist slogans and concepts like duty and devotion.

    They were raised to believe in Adolf Hitler and their “racial” supremacy. Moreover, as Nicholas Stargardt of Oxford University recounts in his book “Children’s Lives Under the Nazis,” many children were trained to have an inflated sense of responsibility, leading them to sacrifice themselves and others in the war’s last months. On the 8th of November, 1943, Liselotte questioned herself: “Is it not our holy responsibility to continue the fight?

    buy oseltamivir online in the best USA pharmacy https://petspawtx.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/png/oseltamivir.html no prescription with fast delivery drugstore

    If Germany were to be completely destroyed, then our bravery would be on par.
    buy clomiphene online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/clomiphene.html no prescription pharmacy

    Also, if we all die, 1918 will be over. Adolf Hitler, I believe in you and the German victory.”

    The Nazis aimed to instill their ideology in the brains of future generations as early as possible. They employed their youth groups for this purpose. The Hitler Youth (HJ) was the most influential of their youth groups. Its beginnings may be traced back to 1926. Beginning in the spring of 1940, all children ages 10 to 14 were required to join the Jungvolk and pledge loyalty to Adolf Hitler, making membership mandatory for all youths between the ages of 14 and 18 already in 1939.

    The Jungmädelbund (JM) and League of German Girls (Bund Deutscher Mädel, BDM) were formed to represent and advocate for the rights of the girls. Virtually all German children and teenagers between the ages of 10 and 18 were members of the organizations since participation was required by law.

    Additionally, in 1933, all other youth groups were outlawed as well. The idea was that the Nazi state would instill its ideology directly and offer paramilitary training for youngsters via physical exercise, rather than leaving instruction only to schools and homes. Hitler and the Nazi leadership relied on this kind of indoctrination to ensure their continued rule for the foreseeable future.

    Topics like “Germanic Gods and Heroes,” “The People and Their Blood Heritage,” and “Adolf Hitler and His Fellow Fighters” were featured in the HJ units’ curriculum. Children were exposed to the age-appropriate propaganda radio broadcast at structured events including parades, field trips, and family night.

    Children were tasked with gathering herbs from the woods and sorting through trash in the city, where they found items such as clothing, metal, and even bones. Girls knitted socks and mittens for troops at the front, assisted in kindergartens, and served food and coffee at railway stations to passing soldiers, many of whom the girls later corresponded with via letters.

    Inherently prepared to lay down their lives for others

    Some young people were tremendously drawn to the military because of the feeling of community it fostered, the appeal of a sense of duty, the uniforms, and the freedom they were promised once they were distant from their families and schools. Joachim Lörzer, a contemporary witness, recalls feeling quite mature in his HJ outfit at the age of twelve. According to him, in 1944, he was completely ready to give his life for “Führer, folk, and fatherland.”

    Decades later, some kids said they didn’t care about politics because they were too busy hanging out with their pals and having fun. Others remembered the torturous drills that everyone had to do, while others felt a profound sense of idealism. Postwar interviews with former war children revealed widespread feelings of “betrayal” and “abuse” among those who, like Liselotte, had trusted the dictatorship and its promises. National Socialism gave them the false sense of superiority they needed to believe in their own uniqueness before sending them unprepared to their graves.

    Fast-tracked military training

    The militarization of youth was already visible by the time World War II broke out, but it grew more so after the war’s outbreak. Military training centers were established where any 15-year-old could be taught as a mini-soldier within three weeks, and the Hitler Youth’s shooting duties were increased. It wasn’t until 1943 that boys became common flak helpers.

    The conflict shaped the future of Germany’s youth. Repeatedly, soldiers were seen making their way inside classrooms. In schools and other public buildings, students and visitors might see maps depicting the front lines. German kids chanted war poetry as they built model battleships in art class. Nazi propaganda films like “Our Flags Lead Us Forward” (Hitlerjunge Quex), with the revealing caption “A Film of the Sacrificial Spirit of German Youth,” were distributed to children as Christmas gifts. In the movie, a boy who is a firm believer in the HJ is killed by his “communist” companions.

    In the front, the dads helped their kids with their assignments

    Hitler's use of child soldiers in the Nazi regime
    (Credit: The Wiener Holocaust Library Collections)

    Families were profoundly affected by Nazi ideology. The dads were in the thick of battle, but they kept in touch with their kids through field letters. They keep coming back to the same story of struggle in their letters to one another. Some dads encouraged their children in letters by telling them to “hold your own” and “be a strong, courageous German girl.” On the other side, we observe that dads serving overseas penned touching letters to their children, offering handmade gifts or helpful guidance for the future. Some of the letters include schoolwork that had been graded and returned to the parents by the children after being corrected by their dads.

    The National Socialists attempted to inject their philosophy into the domestic sphere, but they were only partially successful. Historians note that there was a limit to the amount of time family conflicts could last. According to ex-BDM women, they never betrayed their own parents. However, there is still case-by-case data that contradicts the overall trend. There was a lot of love and support inside the family, even though everyone was a dedicated Nazi adherent.

    The top Nazis assemble a final posse

    Letters and diaries written by youngsters in the severe tone of Wehrmacht reports demonstrate the extent to which Nazi ideology permeated the world of children. In 1939, a 14-year-old wrote, “The industrial heart of Upper Silesia is almost completely in German hands, and the city of Lodsch has been taken. Führer in Lodsch.” German children became used to their putative leadership position, whereas children in the occupied areas of the East were taught to admire and follow the “Herrenmenschen” (“Master Humans.”)

    A Polish BDM volunteer wrote home to her family, “They are insolent as nothing and gape at us like marvels of the world,” arguing that Polish youngsters should be forced to work. Another BDM girl described how, when she was a little child, her father had told her that the Poles, because of demographic shifts, would swiftly overrun the German Reich if nothing was done. To put it simply, she was terrified of this happening.

    As the battle progressed and the Nazi regime’s ideology hardened, the regime’s true inconsistencies and relentless cruelty became clear. Nazi officials betrayed the same individuals they had praised for years as the “future of the people” by sacrificing them when defeat was certain. Formed in 1944, the Volkssturm enlisted all able-bodied males between the ages of 16 and 60 to fight in the “final victory.” The young people’s sobering experience stood in sharp contrast to their solemn allegiance to the Führer.

    buy antabuse online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/antabuse.html no prescription pharmacy

    Tools, training, and standard-issue garments were all in short supply.

    There were only 40,500 rifles and 2,900 machine guns in the Volkssturm’s main arsenal by the end of January 1945. These weapons were a mishmash of primarily foreign and antiquated models, and ammunition for them was sometimes scarce. The lads were provided ancient, black SS uniforms from the pre-war years (…) and – especially unpleasant for 15-year-olds who wanted to prove what they could accomplish for the Fatherland – French steel helmets.

    A contrast between idealized notions of warriors and the harsh reality they face

    Günter Lucks, a Hamburger, was one of those deployed to the battlefront in Vienna. The 16-year-old had joyfully obeyed his reporting order to the Volkssturm. “I finally felt like an adult, like a real soldier in the making. And I was pleased to be of service to the Fatherland at this most important time.”

    However, instead of excitement and chivalrous warrior romance, disillusionment and dissatisfaction swiftly set in. He told his mother on February 25, 1945, that he was sick of military training at the Reich’s camp at Lázn Luhacovice, Moravia. “You’re correct, I’d rather be in the post office 10 times over.” Following a brief period of training, Lucks led a group of HJ youngsters to the advancing front near Vienna.

    Captain Otto Hafner was perusing a chart when Lucks and his company marched up. Subsequently, Hafner reflected, “They were boys, with babyish complexions and oversized field blouses. Their small fingers hid behind the long sleeves, the narrow faces under the far too enormous helmets. (…) It was a major worry of mine. Should I send these kids into battle against the Russians?”

    When Günter Lucks fired his first shot, he was near Brno, and the experience was “surreal” for him. Unlike many of his companions, he made it through captivity until the conclusion of the war. Nearly 60,000 German boys aged 15 to 17 who were born between 1927 and 1929 lost their lives during the war, most of them as a result of conscription in 1944 and 1945.

    buy zepbound online https://sballergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/jpg/zepbound.html no prescription pharmacy

    There were almost 1.5 million people in all cohorts from 1920 and 1929.

    The brother of Liselotte was also enlisted in the Volkssturm. “Girls should also learn to use the Panzerfaust as Bertel has. They could hold her own against any tank.

    buy cialis professional online in the best USA pharmacy https://petspawtx.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/png/cialis-professional.html no prescription with fast delivery drugstore

    ” In her diary for April 1945, Liselotte made an interesting observation. After waiting a few days, she finally put pen to paper and wrote: “Bertel was sent to the front lines only the day before. It breaks my heart to see boys as young as 15–18 riding out on trucks or bicycles, armed with a carbine, pistol, or bazooka. My heart swells with pride for our boys, who still charge the tanks when they hear the word. However, they are hastily being put to death.”

    Liselotte’s journal shows that she has serious misgivings about the Führer and the government, even at this early stage. The revelation that the Nazis had executed Wehrmacht commanders was a turning point that led to this shift in view. The diary entry of April 12, 1945, says: “To hang a German, a Prussian officer! Curse them, curse the whole Nazi mob, these war criminals and murderers of Jews.” The girl makes one of the very few references to Jews. In their journals and correspondence, many Germans chose to remain quiet about what happened to the Jews.

    It was on May 17, 1945, when Liselotte made her last note in her diary. She’d heard that Bertel and the rest of the HJs had all perished. The teen observed: “So many, many soldiers shirked and chickened out, but Bertel was much too enthusiastic for that. For whom then? For Hitler? For Germany? Poor, hardened youth!” A realization that arrived, sadly, too late.